Treatment of mild chronic hepatitis C with interferon alpha-2b: results of a multi-centre randomized study in 80 patients

Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results

BACKGROUND

Health state utility values (HSUVs) identified from utility elicitation studies are widely used in pharmacoeconomic evaluations for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and are particularly instrumental in health technology assessment (HTA) evaluations such as those from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify HSUVs used in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) for CHC in Europe and to evaluate the impact of HSUV selection on cost-effectiveness results in terms of the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (ICER).

METHODS

A systematic search of pharmacoeconomic evaluations for CHC was updated in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for the periods 2012-2017 and 2017-2020. Data on health states, HSUVs, and utility elicitation studies were extracted. The difference in HSUVs of the same health state in different CUAs, and the difference between HSUVs of one health state and of the interlink health state in the same CUAs, were calculated. A quality assessment was performed to evaluate the selection of HSUVs in CUAs. Sets of HSUVs identified were used in a reconstructed CUA model to assess the impact on the ICER.

RESULTS

Twenty-six CUAs conducted in European countries and referring to 17 utility elicitation studies were included. The difference in HSUVs of the same health state in different CUAs ranged from 0.021 (liver transplant) to 0.468 (decompensated cirrhosis). The difference between HSUVs of one health state and of the interlink health state of the next disease severity level was calculated between the health states of F0-F1/mild and F2-F3/moderate (n = 11, 0.040-0.110), F2-F3/moderate and F4/compensated cirrhosis (n = 18, 0.027-0.130), compensated cirrhosis and decompensated cirrhosis (n = 22, 0.020-0.100), decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 24, 0.000-0.200), hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplant in the first year (n = 17, - 0.329 to 0.170) and liver transplant in the first and subsequent years (n = 17, - 0.340 to 0.000). The utility elicitation study selected by most CUAs (n = 11) was recommended as the source of HSUVs, at least for the CUAs conducted in the UK, based on the results of quality assessment. Seven sets of HSUVs were generated to fit the reconstructed model and changed the results of the incremental analysis from being cost effective to not being cost effective (ICER ranging from £2460 to £24,954 per QALY gained), and to being dominated in the UK setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The CUAs for CHC were found to apply to various HSUVs from different utility elicitation studies in the same health state. This variability in HSUVs has the potential to significantly affect ICER and ICER-based reimbursement decisions. A rigorous selection of HSUVs in CUAs to inform healthcare resource allocation is suggested for future studies of CUAs and for guideline development.

Challenges and Controversies in the Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection (Part 1)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is emerging as a public health issue in most counties worldwide. The prevalence of HCV infection varies among different geographical areas from 0.5% to 40% with an overall global prevalence of 3%. The WHO estimates that around 170 million people are chronically infected with HCV world wide. Hepatitis CV infection causes a slowly progressive liver disease in over 60% of infected individuals culminating into cirrhosis and ultimately leading to liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic liver disease due to HCV infection is now the leading indication for livertransplantation both in Europe and the USA. Although the incidence of acute hepatitis C has decreased over the last decade, the number of individuals with HCV-related liver disease continues to rise and is projected to peak around year 2015. As such HCV infection imposes a significant burden on the already exhausted health resources, particularly in the developing counties where the infection is endemic and its incidence is increasing.

Predictive value of ALT levels for histologic findings in chronic hepatitis C: a European collaborative study

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the predictive value of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels for histologic findings in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Data on 864 HCV RNA-positive patients were collected. ALT values were obtained at the time of biopsy (before treatment), and normal ALT values were defined as normal values obtained at serial evaluations during a 6-month period. Histologic results were scored using the METAVIR system. Among all patients, 99% of those with elevated ALT levels had a score of at least F1 (positive predictive value [PPV], 99%) and 88% had a score greater than A1F1. Among patients with persistently normal ALT values, 65% had a score of at least F1 (negative predictive value [NPV], 35%) and 26% had a score greater than A1F1. The receiver operating characteristics analysis indicates that the ALT threshold for the best compromise sensitivity-specificity was about 2.25 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). In conclusion, almost all HCV RNA-positive patients with elevated ALT levels have some degree of fibrosis. However, an important proportion of patients with persistently normal ALT levels also show some histologic signs of fibrosis; the degree of fibrosis is usually mild but is sometimes more marked, and in rare cases cirrhosis may be present. In this subset of patients, the indication of liver biopsy and the potential benefit of therapy need to be further evaluated. These results suggest the need to revisit the algorithm for liver biopsy practice.

Success in treating mild chronic hepatitis C: different outcomes -- new guidelines?

Limited knowledge of the natural history of chronic hepatitis C suggests that patients with mild histological changes on liver biopsy are at low risk of developing liver related morbidity or mortality. Patients with mild disease have been excluded from the large trials of treatment for hepatitis C and consequently guidelines recommend that they are excluded from treatment. However, as the probability of a beneficial response to treatment increases with improvements in antiviral therapy so the threshold for treatment falls. Trials reporting good responses to treatment in patients with mild disease support the case for widening access to treatment. Increasing recognition that chronic hepatitis C infection can lead to impairment of quality of life that is independent of liver histology is likely to result in more patients with mild hepatitis seeking treatment, more clinical trials that include patients with milder stages of liver disease, and greater enthusiasm for their inclusion in treatment guidelines.