Esophageal squamous papillomatosis

Findings of Endoscopic US and CT of Esophageal Disease

Various diseases can affect the esophagus. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), which provides precise information about the layers of the esophageal wall, is the primary approach used to investigate esophageal diseases. However, CT is one of the most important imaging modalities for diagnosing esophageal diseases as it can elucidate mediastinal involvement, adjacent lymphadenopathy, and distant disease spread. These two modalities complement each other in the diagnosis of esophageal diseases. Although radiologists may be unfamiliar with EUS procedures and their interpretation, understanding them aids in the differential diagnosis of esophageal conditions. This pictorial essay illustrates the EUS and CT findings of various esophageal diseases originating in the esophageal wall.

Detection of Human Papillomavirus in Squamous Papilloma of the Esophagus

Introduction: The etiology of esophageal squamous papilloma (ESP) is largely unknown. Previous studies have shown a variable association with human papillomavirus (HPV) with conflicting data. The aim of this study was to further investigate the possible association of HPV in our ESP series using RNA in-situ hybridization (ISH) and compare study groups from the United States of America and China. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of patients with ESP were retrieved from the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) (1/2016-3/2019) and Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) (9/2014-3/2019) pathology databases. Hematoxylin and eosin slides were reexamined. Confirmed cases were examined by high- and low-risk HPV RNA ISH. Results: For the UCLA cohort, 13 429 upper endoscopies were performed and 78 biopsies from 72 patients were identified as ESP (F:M = 45:27, 66.7% > 45 years). Seventy-four (94.9%) biopsies were designated as polyps or nodules and 46.6% were located in the mid-esophagus. Other abnormal findings included gastroesophageal reflux disease (48.6%), hiatal hernia (38.9%), and esophagitis (36.1%). For the PUMCH cohort, 63 754 upper endoscopies were performed and 73 biopsies from 71 patients were identified as ESP (F:M = 48:23, 71.8% > 45 years). Sixty-four (87.7%) biopsies were designated as polyps or nodules and 57.5% were located in the mid-esophagus. Other abnormal findings included esophagitis (19.7%), and hiatal hernia (8.5%). No features of conventional cytologic dysplasia or viral cytopathic change were found. None of the cases was associated with squamous cell carcinoma, and none showed positive HPV RNA ISH results. Conclusions: No association was found between ESP and active HPV infection in our 2 cohorts. Other etiopathogenetic mechanisms, such as aging, might contribute to the development of these innocent lesions.

Gastrointestinal: Distal esophageal squamous papillomatosis in a healthy 47-year-old man

A 47-year-old man with a background history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and seasonal asthma underwent a gastroscopy for further investigation. Endoscopy revealed numerous polypoid lesions diffusely distributed in the lower third of the esophagus, with histology revealing squamous papilloma with occasional intraepithelial lymphocytes. The diagnosis was esophageal squamous papillomatosis (ESP), which is a rare condition characterized by exophytic and circumferential projections with friable mucosa diffusely spread through the esophagus with unclear etiology and malignancy risk.

Esophageal papillomatosis: an exceedingly rare disease

If esophageal papilloma (EP) is a rare condition, esophageal papillomatosis (EPS) is a distinct rarity. To date, only 53 well documented cases have been described in English literature. However, the number of reports on EPS significantly increased to over 40 cases during the past 20 years. Perhaps, this is due to the broad use of endoscopy and related research achievements. Most of the cases are individual and it seems that there are no associations between them. And up to now no guidelines can be followed. To further understand this exceedingly rare disease, we had a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, etiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, treatment, and clinical course of EPS.

Dots, lines, contours, and ends: An image-based review of esophageal pathology

•

Learning Point #1: Small ulcers on esophagography are usually attributable to herpes esophagitis and drug-induced esophagitis. Although rare, Crohn’s disease may produce small apthoid ulcers. Large ulcers are usually attributable to CMV or HIV esophagitis.

•

Learning Point #2: The early findings of candida are plaques that mimic glycogenic acanthosis. When plaques are seen, consider early candida or glycogenic acanthosis. When shaggy esophagus is identified, consider candidiasis.

•

Learning Point #3: Varices and varicoid esophageal carcinoma may appear similar on imaging. The presence of obstruction and lack of change with time and position should sway the Radiologist to diagnosing varicoid esophageal carcinoma.

•

Learning Point #4: Transverse esophageal lines should suggest the entities of feline esophagus and idiopathic eosinophilic esophagitis.

•

Learning Point #5: Esophageal contour abnormalities may suggest extrinsic or intrinsic lesions. Extrinsic lesions include aberrant vessels. Intrinsic lesions include intramural pseudodiverticulosis, gastroesophageal reflux, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal cancer.

Esophageal pathologies encountered on fluoroscopic examination may pose a diagnostic challenge to the interpreting Radiologist. Understanding the varied imaging appearances of esophageal pathology requires a thorough understanding of barium esophagography. This article reviews the various fluoroscopic imaging findings of different esophageal pathologies by describing an approach to image interpretation centered on dots, lines, contours, and ends. By utilizing this approach, the Radiologist will be better positioned to reconcile seemingly disparate pathologies into a cogent and succinct differential diagnosis.

Successful Treatment of Extensive Esophageal Squamous Papillomatosis With Cryotherapy

Esophageal squamous papilloma is a rare endoscopic finding, and esophageal squamous papillomatosis (ESP) is considered exceptionally rare, with only a limited number of cases reported to date. There is a paucity of literature about the management of these lesions, and it remains largely controversial. We report a 61-year-old man who presented for endoscopic treatment of ESP detected during endoscopic evaluation for heartburn. Given the potential risk of malignant transformation, a decision was made to proceed with spray cryoablation, requiring a total of 3 sessions of ablative therapy. The histopathological assessment confirmed the diagnosis, and the specimens tested negative for all low- and high-risk human papillomavirus subtypes. Follow-up endoscopies revealed near-complete resolution. To our knowledge, the present report describes the second successful treatment of ESP using endoscopic spray cryotherapy.

Detection of human papillomavirus in esophageal papillomas: systematic review and meta-analysis

Since first suggested (in 1982), etiological role for human papillomavirus (HPV) in esophageal papillomas has aroused increasing interest. The objective of this study was to perform systematic review and formal meta-analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in esophageal squamous cell papillomas (ESCP). Literature was searched through May 2012. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% CI), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I(2) statistics. Meta-regression was used to test the impact of study-level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size, and potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry. Thirty nine studies were eligible, covering 427 ESCPs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 132 (30.9%) cases tested HPV positive; effect size 0.375 (95% CI 0.319-0.434) using the fixed-effects (FE) model and 0.412 (95% CI 0.295-0.540) using the random-effects model. In meta-analysis stratified by (i) HPV detection technique and (ii) geographic study origin, the between-study heterogeneity was not significant (p = 0.071 and p = 0.105, respectively). In meta-regression, HPV detection method (p = 0.260) and geographic origin (p = 0.436) were not significant study-level covariates accounting for the heterogeneity in HPV prevalence. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for PCR-based studies, with a marginal impact on summary effect size estimates. In sensitivity analysis, all meta-analytic results were robust to all one-by-one study removals. In stratified meta-analysis and formal meta-regression, the variability in HPV detection rates in ESCPs is not explained by the HPV detection method or geographic origin of the study.

Values of gastroscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosis and treatment of esophageal papilloma

AIM: To explore the value of gastroscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosis and treatment of esophageal papilloma.

METHODS: Forty nine cases with esophageal papilloma confirmed by pathological examination underwent gastroscopy and 24 of them underwent endoscopic ultrasonography. Then their manifestations of gastroscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography as well as the relationship between the pathologic and clinical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS: On gastroscopy, most lesions of EP cases were located at the middle or distal esophagus (89.8%), assuming feather-like or corpora mammillaria-like bulge, with floccular or fine granular-like surface and grayish-white color, and most of the EP was single with diameter ranging from 0.3-0.6 cm. Of 24 cases undergoing endoscopic ultrasonography, 17 were diagnosed as EP (70.8%), and 6 were diagnosed as inflammatory proliferation or polypus (25%). The classic endosonographic characteristics were even iso-echoic with clear boundary originating from mucosa layer, protruding into the lumen.

CONCLUSION: Esophageal papilloma is well displayed on endoscopic ultrasonography, which could be used to determine indications of endoscopy.