Intensive alternating drug pairs after remission induction for treatment of infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group Pilot Study

[Infant acute leukemia]

If acute leukemia is the most frequent cancer in childhood (33%), it remains a very rare diagnosis in infants less than one year old, e.g. less than 5% of cases. At this age, the frequency of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (almost all of B-lineage) is quite similar to the one of myeloblastic forms (AML). Infant leukemia frequently presents with high hyperleucocytosis, major tumoral burden and numerous extra-hematological features, especially in central nervous system and skin. Whatever the lineage, the leukemic cell is often very immature cytologically and immunologically. Rearrangements of the Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) gene, located on band 11q23, are the hallmark of these immature leukemias and confer a particular resistance to conventional approaches, corticosteroids and chemotherapy. The immaturity of infants less than 1-year-old is associated to a decrease of the tolerable dose-intensity of some drugs (anthracyclines, alkylating agents) or asks questions about some procedures like radiotherapy or high dose conditioning regimen, responsible of inacceptable acute and late toxicities. The high level of severe infectious diseases and other high-grade side effects limits also the capacity to cure these infants. The survival of infants less than 1-year-old with AML is only 50% but similar to older children. On the other hand, survival of those with ALL is the same, then quite limited comparing the 80% survival in children over one year. Allogeneic stem cell transplantations are indicated in high-risk subgroups of infant ALL (age below 6 months, high hyperleucocytosis >300.10(9)/L, MLL-rearrangement, initial poor prednisone response). However, morbidity and mortality remain very important and these approaches cannot be extended to all cases. During the neonatal period, the dismal prognosis linked to the high number of primary failures or very early relapses and uncertainties about the late toxicities question physicians about ethics. It is an emergency to propose different strategies (targeted therapies) to these infants with acute leukemia as conventional trials failed to improve outcome.

Intensified chemotherapy without SCT in infant ALL: results from COG P9407 (Cohort 3)

BACKGROUND

Infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) present with aggressive disease and a poor prognosis. Early relapse within 6-9 months of diagnosis is common. Approximately 75% of infants have MLL-rearranged (MLL-R) ALL with event free survival (EFS) ranging from 20% to 30%. Children's Oncology Group (COG) P9407 used shortened (46 weeks), intensified therapy to address early relapse and poor EFS.

PROCEDURE

P9407 therapy was modified three times for induction toxicity resulting in three cohorts of therapy. One hundred forty-seven infants were enrolled in the third cohort.

RESULTS

We report an overall 5-year EFS and OS of 42.3 ± 6% and 52.9 ± 6.5% respectively. Poor prognostic factors included age ≤90 days at diagnosis, MLL-R ALL and white cell count ≥50,000/μl. For infants ≤90 days of age, the 5-year EFS was 15.5 ± 10.1% and 48.5 ± 6.7% for those >90 days (P < 0.0001). Among infants >90 days of age, 5-year EFS rates were 43.8 ± 8% for MLL-R versus 69.1 ± 13.6% for MLL-germline ALL (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age ≤90 days at diagnosis was the most important prognostic factor. Despite shortened therapy with early intensification, EFS remained less than 50% overall in MLL-R ALL.

The evolution of clinical trials for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in infants has a significantly inferior outcome in comparison with older children. Despite initial improvements in survival of infants with ALL since establishment of the first pediatric cooperative group ALL trials, the poor outcome has plateaued in recent years. Historically, infants were treated on risk-adapted childhood ALL protocols. These studies were pivotal in identifying the need for infant-specific protocols, delineating prognostic categories and the requirement for a more unified approach between study groups to overcome limitations in accrual because of low incidence. This subsequently led to the development of collaborative infant-specific studies. Landmark outcomes have included the elimination of cranial radiotherapy following the discovery of intrathecal and high-dose systemic therapy as a superior and effective treatment strategy for central nervous system disease prophylaxis, with improved neurodevelopmental outcome. Universal prospective identification of independent adverse prognostic factors, including presence of a mixed lineage leukemia rearrangement and young age, has established the basis for risk stratification within current trials. The infant-specific trials have defined limits to which conventional chemotherapeutic agents can be intensified to optimize the balance between treatment efficacy and toxicity. Despite variations in therapeutic intensity, there has been no recent improvement in survival due to the equilibrium between relapse and toxicity. Ultimately, to improve the outcome for infants with ALL, key areas still to be addressed include identification and adaptation of novel prognostic markers and innovative therapies, establishing the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission, treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory disease and monitoring and timely intervention of late effects in survivors. This would be best achieved through a single unified international trial.

Secondary adrenal insufficiency in an infant after intrathecal triple chemotherapy

Intrathecal triple chemotherapy (ITT) with hydrocortisone, methotrexate, and cytarabine is commonly used in treatment of pediatric acute leukemias. While prolonged systemic administration of corticosteroids is known to suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, there have been no reports describing this effect following administration of ITT. We present an infant with relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia who developed clinically significant central adrenal axis suppression following six doses of ITT over 3 weeks, proven by corticorelin stimulation test. As multiple pediatric leukemia protocols incorporate ITT, particularly in infants, we feel that ITT should be considered as a potential source of adrenal axis suppression.

Long-term results of the pediatric oncology group studies for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia 1984-2001: a report from the children's oncology group

From 1984 to 2001, the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) conducted 12 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) studies. Ten-year event-free survival (EFS) for patients >12 months of age with B-precursor ALL on acute leukemia in children 14, 15 and 16 series were 66.7+/-1.2%, 68.1+/-1.4% and 73.2+/-2.1%, respectively. Intermediate dose methotrexate (ID MTX; 1 g/m(2)) improved outcomes for standard risk patients (10-year EFS 77.5+/-2.7% vs 66.3+/-3.1% for oral MTX). Neither MTX intensification (2.5 g/m(2)) nor addition of cytosine arabinoside/daunomycin/teniposide improved outcomes for higher risk patients. Intermediate dose mercaptopurine (1 g/m(2)) failed to improve outcomes for either group. Ten-year EFS for patients with T-cell ALL, POG 8704 and 9404 were 49.1+/-3.1% and 72.2+/-4.7%, respectively. Intensive asparaginase (10-year EFS 61.8 vs 42.7%) and high-dose MTX (5 g/m(2)) (10-year EFS 78.0 vs 65.8%) improved outcomes. There was a non-significant improvement in EFS for infants (10-year EFS 17.7+/-7.2-31.9+/-8.3%). Prognostic indicators for B-precursor ALL were age and WBC at diagnosis, gender, central nervous system disease, DNA index and cytogenetic abnormalities. Only gender was prognostic in T-cell ALL. In infants, WBC and MLL translocation were linked to inferior outcome.

Dense methylation of types 1 and 2 regulatory regions of the CD10 gene promoter in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia with MLL/AF4 fusion gene

Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) displays distinct biologic and clinical features with a poor prognosis. The CD10-negative immunophenotype of infant ALL is a hallmark and provides a predictable signature of mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) rearrangement. Although CD10 negativity reflects an earlier stage of B-cell development, complete IgH gene rearrangements (VDJH), found in almost half of the patients, show more mature IgH status. Discordance between immunophenotype and genotype of infant ALL suggests an aberrant process in immunophenotypic steps of differentiation or a secondary down-regulation of CD10 expression. In this study, CD10-negative infant ALL with MLL/AF4, CD10-positive infant ALL with germline MLL, CD10-positive pre-B ALL cell line, infant acute myeloid leukemia (AML; M5) with MLL/AF9 and pediatric AML (M2) with AML1/ETO were analyzed for VDJH status and methylation of CD10 gene promoters. Three of the 4 infant ALL samples showed complete rearrangements of the VDJH gene with productive joints. Bisulfite sequencing of CD10 type 1 and 2 promoters showed that more than 84% of the cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) dinucleotides identified were methylated in all 3 CD10-negative infant ALL samples with MLL/AF4. The CpG dinucleotides distributed in the clusters of putative Sp1-binding sites and functionally active regulatory regions of the promoters were fully methylated. In contrast, none of the CpG dinucleotides were methylated in the CD10-positive ALL samples. Structural evidence of dense methylation in the CD10 gene promoter suggested that methylated transcription factor binding sites contribute to CD10 silencing as an epigenetic mechanism.

Outcome of congenital acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on the Interfant-99 protocol

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) diagnosed in the first month of life (congenital ALL) is very rare. Although congenital ALL is often assumed to be fatal, no studies have been published on outcome except for case reports. The present study reports the outcome of 30 patients with congenital ALL treated with the uniform Interfant-99 protocol, a hybrid regimen combining ALL treatment with elements designed for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Congenital ALL was characterized by a higher white blood cell count and a strong trend for higher incidence of MLL rearrangements and CD10-negative B-lineage ALL compared with older infants. Induction failure rate was 13% and not significantly different from that in older infants (7%, P = .14), but relapse rate was significantly higher in congenital ALL patients (2-year cumulative incidence [SE] was 60.0 [9.3] vs 34.2 [2.3], P < .001). Two-year event-free survival and survival of congenital ALL patients treated with this protocol was 20% (SE 9.1%). Early death in complete remission and treatment delays resulting from toxicity were not different. The survival of 17% after last follow-up, combined with a toxicity profile comparable with that in older infants, justifies treating congenital ALL with curative intent. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT 00015873, and at www.controlled-trials.com as no. ISRCTN24251487.

A treatment protocol for infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Interfant-99): an observational study and a multicentre randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in infants younger than 1 year is rare, and infants with the disease have worse outcomes than do older children. We initiated an international study to investigate the effects of a new hybrid treatment protocol with elements designed to treat both acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and acute myeloid leukaemia, and to identify any prognostic factors for outcome in infants. We also did a randomised trial to establish the value of a late intensification course.

METHODS

Patients aged 0-12 months were enrolled by 17 study groups in 22 countries between 1999 and 2005. Eligible patients were stratified for risk according to their peripheral blood response to a 7-day prednisone prophase, and then given a hybrid regimen based on the standard protocol for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, with some elements designed for treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia. Before the maintenance phase, a subset of patients in complete remission were randomly assigned to receive either standard treatment or a more intensive chemotherapy course with high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate. The primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) for the initial cohort of patients and disease-free survival (DFS) for the patients randomly assigned to a treatment group. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 00015873, and at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN24251487.

FINDINGS

In the 482 enrolled patients who underwent hybrid treatment, 260 (58%) were in complete remission at a median follow-up of 38 (range 1-78) months, and EFS at 4 years was 47.0% (SE 2.6, 95% CI 41.9-52.1). Of 445 patients in complete remission after 5 weeks of induction treatment, 191 were randomised: 95 patients to receive a late intensification course, and 96 to a control group. At a median follow-up of 42 (range 1-73) months, 60 patients in the treatment group and 57 controls were disease-free. DFS at 4 years did not differ between the two groups (60.9% [SE 5.2] for treatment group vs 57.0% [5.5] for controls; p=0.81). During the intensification phase, of 71 patients randomly assigned to the treatment group, and for whom toxicity data were available, 35 (49%) had infections, 21 (30%) patients had mucositis, 22 (31%) patients had toxic effects on the liver, and 2 (3%) had neurotoxicity. All types of rearrangements in the (mixed lineage leukaemia) MLL gene, very high white blood cell count, age of younger than 6 months, and a poor response to the prednisone prophase were independently associated with inferior outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Patients treated with our hybrid protocol, and especially those who responded poorly to prednisone, had higher EFS than most reported outcomes for treatment of infant ALL. Delayed intensification of chemotherapy did not benefit patients.

Immunobiological diversity in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia is related to the occurrence and type of MLL gene rearrangement

The aim of this study was to identify immunobiological subgroups in 133 infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases as assessed by their immunophenotype, immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement pattern, and the presence of mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) rearrangements. About 70% of cases showed the pro-B-ALL immunophenotype, whereas the remaining cases were common ALL and pre-B-ALL. MLL translocations were found in 79% of infants, involving MLL-AF4 (41%), MLL-ENL (18%), MLL-AF9 (11%) or another MLL partner gene (10%). Detailed analysis of Ig/TCR rearrangement patterns revealed IGH, IGK and IGL rearrangements in 91, 21 and 13% of infants, respectively. Cross-lineage TCRD, TCRG and TCRB rearrangements were found in 46, 17 and 10% of cases, respectively. As compared to childhood precursor-B-ALL, Ig/TCR rearrangements in infant ALL were less frequent and more oligoclonal. MLL-AF4 and MLL-ENL-positive infants demonstrated immature rearrangements, whereas in MLL-AF9-positive leukemias more mature rearrangements predominated. The immature Ig/TCR pattern in infant ALL correlated with young age at diagnosis, CD10 negativity and predominantly with the presence and the type of MLL translocation. The high frequency of immature and oligoclonal Ig/TCR rearrangements is probably caused by early (prenatal) oncogenic transformation in immature B-lineage progenitor cells with germline Ig/TCR genes combined with a short latency period.

Towards targeted therapy for infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Despite the greatly improved treatment regimes for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in general, resulting in long-term survival in approximately 80% of cases, current therapies still fail in >50% of ALL cases diagnosed within the first year of life (i.e. in infants). Therefore, more adequate treatment strategies are urgently needed to also improve the prognosis for these very young patients with ALL. Here we review the current acquaintance with the biology of infant ALL and describe how this knowledge may lead to innovative therapeutic approaches.

Treatment of infants with lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the UK Infant Protocols 1987-1999

One hundred and twenty-six infants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) were treated on two consecutive protocols, Infant 87 (n = 40) and Infant 92 (n = 86), in an attempt to improve the poor prognosis of this disease. Both included intensive induction and consolidation with intrathecal and high-dose systemic therapy for central nervous system (CNS) protection. Intensification therapy was modified and high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation in first remission was permitted in Infant 92. Four-year event-free survival was superior in Infant 92 (33%; 95% CI 23-44%) compared with Infant 87 (22.5%; 95% CI 12-37%) (P = 0.04) and survival at 4 years was also superior, 46% (95% CI 35-57%) c.f. 32.5% (95% CI 20-48%) (P = 0.01), largely as a result of a significant reduction in remission deaths. Twelve patients in Infant 92 underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in first remission, but their survival was no better than that of patients receiving chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors showed the adverse influence of younger age, CNS involvement at diagnosis and a high initial leucocyte count, but not of CD10 expression. Cytogenetic analysis, available in 93% of patients in Infant 92, showed that 67% had chromosomal rearrangements involving 11q23 of which 39% had the translocation t(4;11) (q21;q23). There was no significant difference in event-free survival between cytogenetic subgroups, although no children under 6 months of age with 11q23 abnormalities, other than the t(4;11), survived. In conclusion, infants with lymphoblastic leukaemia remain a high-risk group, but it is unclear whether their adverse prognosis can be attributed to unfavourable cytogenetics alone. The role of high-dose therapy and BMT in first remission remains uncertain.

Long-term results of treatment studies for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Pediatric Oncology Group studies from 1986-1994

This paper presents the long-term results of treatment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as conducted by the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) from 1986 to 1994. The data are presented using standard NCI/Rome risk criteria. The overall event-free survival (EFS) at 5 and 10 years were 70.9% and 67.3% for children with B-precursor ALL, 51.0% and 50.2% for patients with T cell ALL, and 22.4% and 20.9% for infants with ALL. Concomitant biologic studies found that in B-precursor ALL a DNA index (DI) of > or =1.16 and trisomies of both chromosomes 4 and 10 were good prognostic indicators for patients with B-precursor ALL. The traditional prognostic indicators (age and white count), DI and trisomies did not predict outcome in patients with T cell disease. Infants continued to do poorly overall despite more intensive therapy with rotating pairs of chemotherapy. We recommend continued reporting of study results using common risk criteria in order to facilitate comparisons both within and across study groups.

Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Challenges and Controversies in 2000

This article discusses ways in which pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can be stratified to receive intensive and less intensive therapies in order to decrease morbidity and mortality. Specifically, the focus may shift away from current intensive therapies for ultra low-risk patients and away from transplantation for certain patients at relapse. In contrast, infants with ALL comprise an ultra high-risk population in need of specialized approaches.

In Section I Dr. Lange describes the need to identify ultra low-risk children. Groups around the world have improved the outcome of children with ALL by identifying the basic “total therapy” model of the 1970s and stratifying treatment according to risk of relapse. Current first-line treatment cures about 85% of children with standard-risk ALL and 70% of children with high-risk disease. However, all children receive anthracyclines, alkylating agents, or moderate- to high-dose antimetabolite infusions. While randomized clinical trials prove that these intensifications reduce relapses, they also show that half of all children with ALL can be cured with the modest therapy of the 1970s and early 1980s. The patients curable with lesser therapy may be considered an ultra low-risk group. Attempts to use age, gender, white count, morphology, and karyotype to identify the ultra low-risk group of patients with a 90-95% cure rate with minimal therapy have failed. An expanded repertoire of tools such as pharmacogenetic profiling, PCR measurement of minimal residual disease and microarray technology may make this goal achievable in this decade.

In section II Dr. Chessells addresses the management of children with relapsed ALL. The chance of successful re-treatment with conventional chemotherapy for relapse depends on the duration of first remission and the site of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation from a histocompatible sibling or other suitable donor, which is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for children with a first remission of &lt; 24 months, is associated with a high risk of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation for later bone marrow relapse improves leukemia-free survival but has significant short-term and long-term toxicities. The challenges are to develop more effective treatment for early relapse and to identify those children with relapsed ALL who are curable with chemotherapy or, failing this, those children who would be candidates for bone marrow transplantation in third remission.

In Section III Dr. Felix addresses the problem of infant ALL. ALL of infancy is clinically aggressive, and infants continue to have the worst prognosis of all pediatric patients with ALL. High white blood cell count, younger age, bulky extramedullary disease, and CNS disease at diagnosis are unfavorable characteristics. These features occur with MLL gene translocations. The probability of an MLL gene translocation and the probability of poor outcome both are greatest in younger infants. Specialized intensive chemotherapy approaches and bone marrow transplantation in first remission for this disease may lead to improved survival.

Refined recognition of pediatric patients with ALL who need more and less intensive therapies is necessary to increase survival and decrease toxicities.

Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Challenges and Controversies in 2000

This article discusses ways in which pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) can be stratified to receive intensive and less intensive therapies in order to decrease morbidity and mortality. Specifically, the focus may shift away from current intensive therapies for ultra low-risk patients and away from transplantation for certain patients at relapse. In contrast, infants with ALL comprise an ultra high-risk population in need of specialized approaches.

In Section I Dr. Lange describes the need to identify ultra low-risk children. Groups around the world have improved the outcome of children with ALL by identifying the basic “total therapy” model of the 1970s and stratifying treatment according to risk of relapse. Current first-line treatment cures about 85% of children with standard-risk ALL and 70% of children with high-risk disease. However, all children receive anthracyclines, alkylating agents, or moderate- to high-dose antimetabolite infusions. While randomized clinical trials prove that these intensifications reduce relapses, they also show that half of all children with ALL can be cured with the modest therapy of the 1970s and early 1980s. The patients curable with lesser therapy may be considered an ultra low-risk group. Attempts to use age, gender, white count, morphology, and karyotype to identify the ultra low-risk group of patients with a 90-95% cure rate with minimal therapy have failed. An expanded repertoire of tools such as pharmacogenetic profiling, PCR measurement of minimal residual disease and microarray technology may make this goal achievable in this decade.

In section II Dr. Chessells addresses the management of children with relapsed ALL. The chance of successful re-treatment with conventional chemotherapy for relapse depends on the duration of first remission and the site of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation from a histocompatible sibling or other suitable donor, which is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for children with a first remission of < 24 months, is associated with a high risk of relapse. Bone marrow transplantation for later bone marrow relapse improves leukemia-free survival but has significant short-term and long-term toxicities. The challenges are to develop more effective treatment for early relapse and to identify those children with relapsed ALL who are curable with chemotherapy or, failing this, those children who would be candidates for bone marrow transplantation in third remission.

In Section III Dr. Felix addresses the problem of infant ALL. ALL of infancy is clinically aggressive, and infants continue to have the worst prognosis of all pediatric patients with ALL. High white blood cell count, younger age, bulky extramedullary disease, and CNS disease at diagnosis are unfavorable characteristics. These features occur with MLL gene translocations. The probability of an MLL gene translocation and the probability of poor outcome both are greatest in younger infants. Specialized intensive chemotherapy approaches and bone marrow transplantation in first remission for this disease may lead to improved survival.

Refined recognition of pediatric patients with ALL who need more and less intensive therapies is necessary to increase survival and decrease toxicities.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children

As the overall long-term event-free survival rate in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia approaches 80%, emphasis is being placed on risk-directed therapy so that patients are neither overtreated nor undertreated. It has become apparent that a risk assignment system based on primary genetic abnormalities is inadequate by itself. For example, leukemias with the MLL-AF4 or BCR-ABL fusion gene are, in fact, heterogeneous diseases. Many require allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation; some, if the patient is of favorable age and has a low presenting leukocyte count, can be cured with chemotherapy alone. Measurement of early responses to therapy and extent of minimal residual disease can greatly improve the accuracy of risk assessment. Consideration of the variable effects of therapy on the prognostic significance of specific genetic abnormalities is also important. Therefore, TEL-AML1 fusion confers a favorable prognosis in some protocols of chemotherapy but not in others. Studies to identify genetic polymorphisms with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic significance promise to guide further refinement of treatment strategies. This will allow maximization of anticancer effects without induction of unacceptable toxicity in individual patients.

Prednisone Response Is the Strongest Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

To define prognostic factors in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the outcome of 106 infants (age ≤12 months) during 3 consecutive multicenter trials of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group (ALL-BFM 83, 86, and 90) was retrospectively analyzed according to presenting features and early in vivo response to prednisone. The prednisone response was defined as the cytoreduction (number of blood blasts per microliter at day 8) to a 7-day prednisone prephase and 1 intrathecal dose of methotrexate on day 1. Prednisone good responder (PGR; <1,000 blasts/μL) received conventional therapy and prednisone poor responder (PPR; ≥1,000 blasts/μL) received intensified therapy. Infant ALL was characterized by a high incidence of a white blood cell count greater than 100 × 103/μL (57%), central nervous system leukemia (24%), lack of CD10 expression (59%), 11q23 rearrangement (49%) including the translocation t(4;11) (29%), and a comparatively high proportion of PPR (26%), which were all significantly associated with inferior outcome by univariate analysis. The estimated probability for an event-free survival at 6 years (pEFS) was by far better for PGR compared with PPR, who had a dismal prognosis despite intensified treatment (pEFS, 53% ± 6%v 15% ± 7%, P = .0001). Infant PGR, who were less than 6 months of age (n = 40), lacked CD10 expression (n = 43), and/or had an 11q23 rearrangement (n = 17) fared significantly better compared with corresponding PPR, as indicated by a pEFS of 44% ± 8%, 49% ± 8%, and 41% ± 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PPR was the strongest adverse prognostic factor (relative risk, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.8; P< .0001). Infants with PGR, comprising a major subgroup (74%) among infants, might successfully be treated with conventional therapy, whereas PPR require new therapeutic strategies, including early treatment intensification or bone marrow transplantation in first remission.

Prednisone Response Is the Strongest Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

To define prognostic factors in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the outcome of 106 infants (age ≤12 months) during 3 consecutive multicenter trials of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster group (ALL-BFM 83, 86, and 90) was retrospectively analyzed according to presenting features and early in vivo response to prednisone. The prednisone response was defined as the cytoreduction (number of blood blasts per microliter at day 8) to a 7-day prednisone prephase and 1 intrathecal dose of methotrexate on day 1. Prednisone good responder (PGR; &lt;1,000 blasts/μL) received conventional therapy and prednisone poor responder (PPR; ≥1,000 blasts/μL) received intensified therapy. Infant ALL was characterized by a high incidence of a white blood cell count greater than 100 × 103/μL (57%), central nervous system leukemia (24%), lack of CD10 expression (59%), 11q23 rearrangement (49%) including the translocation t(4;11) (29%), and a comparatively high proportion of PPR (26%), which were all significantly associated with inferior outcome by univariate analysis. The estimated probability for an event-free survival at 6 years (pEFS) was by far better for PGR compared with PPR, who had a dismal prognosis despite intensified treatment (pEFS, 53% ± 6%v 15% ± 7%, P = .0001). Infant PGR, who were less than 6 months of age (n = 40), lacked CD10 expression (n = 43), and/or had an 11q23 rearrangement (n = 17) fared significantly better compared with corresponding PPR, as indicated by a pEFS of 44% ± 8%, 49% ± 8%, and 41% ± 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PPR was the strongest adverse prognostic factor (relative risk, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.8; P&lt; .0001). Infants with PGR, comprising a major subgroup (74%) among infants, might successfully be treated with conventional therapy, whereas PPR require new therapeutic strategies, including early treatment intensification or bone marrow transplantation in first remission.

Secondary leukemias induced by topoisomerase-targeted drugs

The major established cause of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the young is cancer chemotherapy. There are two forms of treatment-related AML (t-AML). Each form has a de novo counterpart. Alkylating agents cause t-AML characterized by antecedent myelodysplasia, a mean latency period of 5-7 years and complete or partial deletion of chromosome 5 or 7. The risk is related to cumulative alkylating agent dose. Germline NF-1 and p53 gene mutations and the GSTT1 null genotype may increase the risk. Epipodophyllotoxins and other DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors cause leukemias with translocations of the MLL gene at chromosome band 11q23 or, less often, t(8;21), t(3;21), inv(16), t(8;16), t(15;17) or t(9;22). The mean latency period is about 2 years. While most cases are of French-American-British (FAB) M4 or FAB M5 morphology, other FAB AML subtypes, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) occur. Between 2 and 12% of patients who receive epipodophyllotoxin have developed t-AML. There is no relationship with higher cumulative epipodophyllotoxin dose and genetic predisposition has not been identified, but weekly or twice-weekly schedules and preceding l-asparaginase administration may potentiate the risk. The translocation breakpoints in MLL are heterogeneously distributed within a breakpoint cluster region (bcr) and the MLL gene translocations involve one of many partner genes. DNA topoisomerase II cleavage assays demonstrate a correspondence between DNA topoisomerase II cleavage sites and the translocation breakpoints. DNA topoisomerase II catalyzes transient double-stranded DNA cleavage and rejoining. Epipodophyllotoxins form a complex with the DNA and DNA topoisomerase II, decrease DNA rejoining and cause chromosomal breakage. Furthermore, epipodophyllotoxin metabolism generates reactive oxygen species and hydroxyl radicals that could create abasic sites, potent position-specific enhancers of DNA topoisomerase II cleavage. One proposed mechanism for the translocations entails chromosomal breakage by DNA topoisomerase II and recombination of DNA free ends from different chromosomes through DNA repair. With few exceptions, treatment-related leukemias respond less well to either chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation than their de novo counterparts, necessitating more innovative treatments, a better mechanistic understanding of the pathogenesis, and strategies for prevention.