Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors

Advances in mobilization for the optimization of autologous stem cell transplantation

In autologous stem cell transplantation, mobilized peripheral blood has replaced the bone marrow as the preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Because HSCs normally exist in the blood in very low numbers, the use of agents to "mobilize" HSCs from the marrow niche to the peripheral blood is essential for successful transplantation. Until recently, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor were the only approved agents by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-mobilizing agents in the United States, but G-CSF has become the gold standard. Unfortunately, some patients fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBSCs for transplantation in response to G-CSF with or without chemotherapy. Recently, a new agent, plerixafor (AMD3100) added to G-CSF has been approved to enhance PBSC mobilization. This review will discuss the current methodologies to improve hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Mobilizing stem cells from normal donors: is it possible to improve upon G-CSF?

Currently, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) remains the standard mobilizing agent for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors, allowing the safe collection of adequate PBSCs from the vast majority of donors. However, G-CSF mobilization can be associated with some significant side effects and requires a multi-day dosing regimen. The other cytokine approved for stem cell mobilization, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), alters graft composition and may reduce the development of graft-versus-host disease, but a significant minority of donors fails to provide sufficient CD34+ cells with GM-CSF and some experience unacceptable toxicity. AMD3100 is a promising new mobilizing agent, which may have several advantages over G-CSF for donor mobilization. As it is a direct antagonist of the interaction between the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 and its receptor CXCR4, AMD3100 mobilizes PBSCs within hours rather than days. It is also well tolerated, with no significant side effects reported in any of the clinical trials to date. Studies of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of AMD3100 mobilized grafts have demonstrated prompt and stable engraftment. Here, we review the current state of stem cell mobilization in normal donors and discuss novel strategies for donor stem cell mobilization.

PBSC mobilization

Intentional recruitment of hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is a clinical process termed peripheral blood stem cell (PSBC) mobilization. Mobilized PSBC has replaced bone marrow as the preferred source of stem cells for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy because of rapid and durable engraftment and reconstitution of functional bone marrow. Although the mechanism involved in the process of PBSC mobilization by cytokines is largely unknown, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or chemotherapy combined with GCSF is used as a mobilizing agent in current clinical practice. To date, G-CSF is the best cytokine for PBSC mobilization. However, there are some controversies in its efficacy (poor mobilizer) and safety (in allogeneic donors). Recent research progress has revealed some part of the mechanistic scenarios of PBSC mobilization and found promising candidates for the agents for PBSC mobilization. Until the research at molecular and cellular levels elucidates the precise mechanisms, collecting and comparing clinical observations is the best way to find more optimal condition for PBSC mobilization.

Enhanced antileukemic activity of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplants following donor treatment with the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF) in a murine transplantation model

Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have mostly been mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). There is neither clinical nor experimental data available addressing the question if other hematopoietic growth factors or combinations thereof might influence engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effects after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT). We used a murine model to investigate these parameters after transplantation of PBPCs mobilized with G-CSF and SCF either alone or in combination. Treatment of splenectomized DBA and Balb/c mice with 250 microg/kg/day G-CSF for 5 days resulted in an increase of CFU-gm from 0 to 53/microl. The highest progenitor cell numbers (147/microl) were observed after treatment with 100 microg/kg/day SCF administered in conjunction with G-SCF. No differences were detected with regard to the number of T cells (CD3+), T cell subsets (CD4+, CD8+), B cells (CD19+) and NK cells (NK1.1+) in PBPC grafts mobilized by G-CSF plus SCF compared to those mobilized with G-CSF alone. The antileukemic activity of syngeneic and MHC-identical allogeneic PBPC grafts was investigated in lethally irradiated Balb/c mice bearing the B-lymphatic leukemia cell line A20. In this model, PBPCs mobilized by G-CSF plus SCF exerted a significantly higher antileukemic activity compared to grafts mobilized by G-CSF alone (94 vs 71% freedom from leukemia at day 100, P<0.05). The antileukemic effect was lowest after BMT (38% freedom from leukemia). Since significant differences in the incidence of lethal GvHD were not observed, improved GVL-activity resulted in superior overall survival. Our data demonstrate that the utilization of specific hematopoietic growth factors not only improve the yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells but can also significantly enhance the immunotherapeutic potential of allografts.

Early neutrophil engraftment following autologous BMT provides a functional predictor of long-term hematopoietic reconstitution

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that the number of CD34+ progenitor cells in the stem cell graft is highly predictive of the rapidity of short-term hematopoietic engraftment. The aim of this study was to identify factors that predict long-term hematopoietic reconstitution (LHR) following autologous BMT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To identify predictors of LHR, peripheral blood counts and marrow biopsies were evaluated at 1 year after transplant in 81 patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia who underwent autologous BMT. Results were correlated with CD34+ cell dose, granulocyte-monocyte colony-forming units (CFU-GM) infused, and time to neutrophil engraftment (TNE).

RESULTS

Total MNC dose, CD34+ cell dose, and CFU-GM infused were significantly associated with TNE (p = 0.011, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.078, respectively). Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia were more likely to have received a low CD34+ cell dose than patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (p = 0.01). Among the four principal predictors, only TNE showed consistent significant correlation with WBC, absolute neutrophil, and platelet count at 1 year after transplant. Logistic regression model showed that TNE was a more sensitive predictor of LHR than either CD34+ cell dose or CFU-GM infused.

CONCLUSION

TNE is an in vivo functional measure of LHR and is a more sensitive predictor of LHR at 1 year after BMT than either CD34+ cell dose or CFU-GM infused.

Spontaneous circulation of myeloid-lymphoid-initiating cells and SCID-repopulating cells in sickle cell crisis

The only curative therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Gene therapy approaches for autologous HSC transplantation are being developed. Although earlier engraftment is seen when cells from GCSF-mobilized blood are transplanted than when bone marrow is transplanted, administration of GCSF to patients with SCD can cause significant morbidity. We tested whether primitive hematopoietic progenitors are spontaneously mobilized in the blood of patients with SCD during acute crisis (AC-SCD patients). The frequency of myeloid-lymphoid-initiating cells (ML-ICs) and SCID-repopulating cells (SRCs) was significantly higher in blood from AC-SCD patients than in blood from patients with steady-state SCD or from normal donors. The presence of SRCs in peripheral blood was not associated with detection of long-term culture-initiating cells, consistent with the notion that SRCs are more primitive than long-term culture-initiating cells. As ML-ICs and SRCs were both detected in blood of AC-SCD patients only, these assays may both measure primitive progenitors. The frequency of ML-ICs also correlated with increases in stem cell factor, GCSF, and IL-8 levels in AC-SCD compared with steady-state SCD and normal-donor sera. Because significant numbers of ML-ICs and SRCs are mobilized in the blood without exogenous cytokine treatment during acute crisis of SCD, collection of peripheral blood progenitors during crisis may yield a source of autologous HSCs suitable for ex-vivo correction by gene therapy approaches and subsequent transplantation.

Stem cell mobilization

Successful blood and marrow transplant (BMT), both autologous and allogeneic, requires the infusion of a sufficient number of hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells (HPCs) capable of homing to the marrow cavity and regenerating a full array of hematopoietic cell lineages in a timely fashion. At present, the most commonly used surrogate marker for HPCs is the cell surface marker CD34, identified in the clinical laboratory by flow cytometry. Clinical studies have shown that infusion of at least 2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg recipient body weight results in reliable engraftment as measured by recovery of adequate neutrophil and platelet counts approximately 14 days after transplant. Recruitment of HPCs from the marrow into the blood is termed mobilization, or, more commonly, stem cell mobilization. In Section I, Dr. Tsvee Lapidot and colleagues review the wide range of factors influencing stem cell mobilization. Our current understanding focuses on chemokines, proteolytic enzymes, adhesion molecules, cytokines and stromal cell-stem cell interactions. On the basis of this understanding, new approaches to mobilization have been designed and are now starting to undergo clinical testing. In Section II, Dr. Michele Cottler-Fox describes factors predicting the ability to mobilize the older patient with myeloma. In addition, clinical approaches to improving collection by individualizing the timing of apheresis and adjusting the volume of blood processed to achieve a desired product are discussed. Key to this process is the daily enumeration of blood CD34(+) cells. Newer methods of enumerating and mobilizing autologous blood HPCs are discussed. In Section III, Dr. John DiPersio and colleagues provide data on clinical results of mobilizing allogeneic donors with G-CSF, GM-CSF and the combination of both as relates to the number and type of cells collected by apheresis. Newer methods of stem cell mobilization as well as the relationship of graft composition on immune reconstitution and GVHD are discussed.

GM-CSF-based mobilization effect in normal healthy donors for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

It is important to optimize methods to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells into peripheral blood (PB) for successful allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Our primary intent was to investigate the role of GM-CSF for mobilization in normal healthy donors and to compare its efficacy in mobilizing stem cells alone, in concurrent combination and in sequential combination with G-CSF in this study. We analyzed the results of the PBSC harvest through large volume leukapheresis from 48 normal healthy donors mobilized by three different regimens including GM-CSF. Donors were assigned sequentially to one of the following regimens for mobilization: GM-CSF 10 microg/kg/day alone (group 1, n = 9); concurrent combination (group 2, n = 20) of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day and GM-CSF 5 microg/kg/day; sequential combination (group 3, n = 19) of GM-CSF alone 10 microg/kg/day for 3 days followed by G-CSF alone 10 microg/kg/day for 2-3 days. The harvested CD34(+) cell count (P < 0.05) was statistically higher in group 3 than in group 1 or 2. Pre-collection WBC count in donors (P < 0.05), harvested MNC (P < 0.05) and CD3(+) cell count (P < 0.05) of group 2 or 3 were significantly higher than those of group 1. Recipients who received stem cells mobilized with combination regimens showed an earlier recovery of WBC and platelets count than those with GM-CSF alone. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was not statistically different among three recipient groups. GM-CSF-based mobilization was well tolerated in normal healthy donors. The sequential combination regimen appears to be an excellent mobilization strategy and might be preferred as the optimal method in some clinical situations that need a higher number of stem cells.