Methods and progress in assessing the quality of life effects of supportive care with erythropoietin therapy

Prevalence of Antibody to Hepatitis E Virus among Haemodialysis Patients in Taiwan: Possible Infection by Blood Transfusion

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A higher prevalence of anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) in non-endemic viral hepatitis such as in Germany has been reported in our previous study. The aim of this study was to assess the seroepidemiology of HEV among haemodialysis (HD) patients in Shin-Kong Hospital, Taiwan, and to evaluate whether there was an increased risk of infection and exposure to HEV even in an area of endemic viral hepatitis.

METHODS

Serum samples obtained from 400 Taiwanese patients on chronic HD (group 1), 400 sex- and age-matched healthy subjects (group 2) and hospital patients (group 3) were tested for the IgG anti-HEV.

RESULTS

The prevalence of anti-HEV among the HD patients and the healthy controls were 31 and 8.9%, respectively. The difference (22%) was statistically significant (p < 0.01). In comparison, the anti-HEV in hospital patients was 16%.

CONCLUSION

The study indicated a significantly higher risk of HEV infection among patients on chronic HD in endemic regions of viral hepatitis such as Taiwan. Mostly because of anaemia, HD patients usually received packed transfusion (red blood cells) if their haemoglobin was low. It is possible that HEV infection may be transmitted through blood transfusions in an endemic area. In such areas, appropriate strategies should be adopted to prevent the risk of HEV among HD patients.

Clinical and economic impact of epoetins in cancer care

Anaemia develops in most patients undergoing cancer therapy and invariably induces fatigue, which is a major determinant of QOL. Blood transfusions are reserved for patients with severe anaemia, since blood is a scarce resource and provides a short-lived benefit. Epoetins are recombinant proteins capable of alleviating therapy-related anaemia in 40-60% of cancer patients. The number of patients needed to be treated with epoetins to avoid the transfusion of one unit of blood ranges from 2.6 to 5.2; however, the absolute risk reduction depends on patients' characteristics and dose-escalation. The ratio between acquisition costs of epoetins and blood transfusion requirement is very high; thus, many thousands of dollars needs to be spent on epoetins to save 1 blood unit. Despite this, epoetins have been widely adopted by industrialised countries, where cancer patients are about 2% of the total population. The resulting budget impact of epoetins can be calculated at about 10% of the overall direct cost for cancer care, and it is expected to continue growing by about 20% each year, due to the expanding cancer population and the intensification of cancer therapies. The economic burden of epoetins needs to be weighed against the improvement of patients' QOL and society's willingness to pay for a non-life-saving therapy. All published economic evaluations of epoetins invariably report that this supportive therapy is not cost effective. Society should be made aware of the opportunity cost of treatments and should be allowed to elicit preferences for healthcare interventions and prioritisation criteria. In the near future we expect that a wider range of epoetins, drug patent expiry, a more appropriate patient selection criteria and an improved dosage schedule may help increase the efficiency of cancer-related anaemia management.

Efficacy of a single, weekly dose of recombinant erythropoietin in myelodysplastic syndromes

Thirteen patients with low-to-intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) received recombinant erythropoietin (r-EPO) at the single, weekly dose of 40.000 U for at least 8 weeks. Five patients (38.4%) achieved a major erythroid response (increased haemoglobin levels > 2 g/dl and/or transfusion independence), which is currently maintained after 3-11 months, without modification of r-EPO dose. This study suggests that 40.000 U r-EPO given once a week may be at least as effective as the more frequent (daily or three times a week) administrations of the drug usually employed in MDS patients.