Cameron RJ, de Wit D, Welsh TN, Ferguson J, Grissell TV, Rye PJ. Virus infection in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring ventilation.
Intensive Care Med 2006;
32:1022-9. [PMID:
16791664 PMCID:
PMC7080063 DOI:
10.1007/s00134-006-0202-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2005] [Accepted: 04/24/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives
We aimed to characterise and quantify the incidence of
common infectious agents in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring ventilation, with a focus on respiratory
viruses.
Design
An epidemiological study conducted over 3 years.
Setting
A 12-bed intensive care unit (ICU).
Participants
ICU patients over 45 years of age with a primary
diagnosis of COPD exacerbation requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or
ventilation via endotracheal tube (ETT).
Materials and methods
Nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) and posterior
pharyngeal swabs (PS) were tested for viruses with immunofluorescence assay
(IFA), virus culture (VC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Paired virus
and atypical pneumonia serology assays were taken. Blood, sputum and
endotracheal aspirates were cultured for bacteria.
Results
107 episodes in 105 patients were recorded. Twenty-three
(21%) died within 28 days. A probable infectious aetiology was found in
69 patient episodes (64%). A virus was identified in 46 cases (43%),
being the sole organism in 35 cases (33%) and part of a mixed infection
in 11 cases (10%). A probable bacterial aetiology was found in 25 cases
(23%). There was no statistically significant difference in clinical
characteristics or outcomes between the group with virus infections and that
without.
Conclusion
Forty-six (43%) of the patients with COPD
exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation had a probable viral pathogen.
Prodromal, clinical and outcome parameters did not distinguish virus from
non-virus illness. PCR was the most sensitive whilst virus culture was the
least of virus assays.
Electronic supplementary material
The electronic reference of this article is http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0202-x. The online full-text version of this article includes electronic supplementary material. This material is available to authorised users and can be accessed by means of the ESM button beneath the abstract or in the structured full-text article. To cite or link to this article you can use the above reference.
Collapse