Immunologic ignorance of organ allografts:

Computational immuno-biology for organ transplantation and regenerative medicine

Organ transplantation and regenerative medicine are adopted platforms that provide replacement tissues and organs from natural or engineered sources. Acceptance, tolerance and rejection depend greatly on the proper control of the immune response against graft antigens, motivating the development of immunological and genetical therapies that prevent organ failure. They rely on a complete, or partial, understanding of the immune system. Ultimately, they are innovative technologies that ensure permanent graft tolerance and indefinite graft survival through the modulation of the immune system. Computational immunology has arisen as a tool towards a mechanistic understanding of the biological and physicochemical processes surrounding an immune response. It comprehends theoretical and computational frameworks that simulate immuno-biological systems. The challenge is centered on the multi-scale character of the immune system that spans from atomistic scales, during peptide-epitope and protein interactions, to macroscopic scales, for lymph transport and organ-organ reactions. In this paper, we discuss, from an engineering perspective, the biological processes that are involved during the immune response of organ transplantation. Previous computational efforts, including their characteristics and visible limitations, are described. Finally, future perspectives and challenges are listed to motivate further developments.

Immunobiology of Rejection and Adaptation

Transplantation is an acceptable therapy for failing organs, however, the balance between prevention of acute rejection and immunosuppressant-induced toxicity remains elusive. Organ transplantation from a genetically disparate donor induces an immune response toward donor antigens in the recipient. An uncontrolled cumulative effect of these responses may jeopardize the recipient's life and destroy the grafted tissue. The donor antigen in the form of passenger leukocytes from the allograft migrating to the organized lymphoid collection is a prerequisite for initiation of acute rejection. In the host lymphoid tissue donor-specific dendritic cells primed with donor peptide activate naïve CD4 helper T cells which in turn activate effector CD8 T-cell clones through the release of cytokines. Activated effector CD8 cells return to the graft and augment destructive activity with the help of adhesive molecules and perforin. This seems to be the mechanism of adaptive immunity to destroy viral pathogens; the pattern of allograft injury is not much different. Adaptation and tolerance are based on the principle of exhaustion of donor-specific immune responses by an activation-deletion-exhaustion pathway.

Immunosuppression for lung transplantation

As a result of advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy, and postoperative management, lung transplantation has become an established therapeutic option for individuals with a variety of end-stage lung diseases. The current 1-year actuarial survival rate following lung transplantation is approximately 75%. However, the processes of acute and chronic lung allograft rejection have limited the long-term success of lung transplantation. Clinicians currently rely on a vast armamentarium of immunosuppressive agents to ameliorate graft rejection, but find themselves limited by an inescapable therapeutic paradox. Insufficient immunosuppression results in graft loss due to rejection, while excess immunosuppression results in increased morbidity and mortality from opportunistic infections and malignancies. Indeed, graft rejection, infection, and malignancy are the three principal causes of mortality for the lung transplant recipient. One should also keep in mind that graft loss in a lung transplant recipient is usually a fatal event, since there is no practical means of long-term mechanical support, and since the prospects of re-transplantation are low, given the shortage of acceptable donor grafts. This chapter reviews the current state of immunosuppressive therapy for lung transplantation, and suggests alternative paradigms for the management of future lung transplant recipients.

Recent advances in the immunology of chronic rejection

Chronic allograft rejection is a slowly progressive, insidious process in which the host immune system continues to mount an immunological attack on a transplanted organ, ultimately resulting in the failure of the graft. To varying degrees, all solid organ grafts are at risk for chronic rejection and undergo a stereotypic process of injury and inflammation, eventually leading to parenchymal fibrosis. The clinical consequences of chronic rejection are particularly apparent in thoracic transplantation, where both patient and graft survival decline steadily over time and the opportunities for re-transplantation or long-term extracorporeal support are limited. A variety of antigen-dependent and antigen-independent factors are known to modulate the propensity for an organ to undergo chronic rejection. Recent clinical and laboratory research has suggested that distinct immunologic mechanisms may underlie the process of chronic rejection. Ultimately, strategies to induce long-term tolerance to alloantigens will be necessary to prevent chronic rejection and to abrogate the deleterious sequelae of chronic immunosuppression.

Treatment with the humanized CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, hu5C8, prevents acute rejection of primary skin allografts in nonhuman primates

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic skin transplantation remains a rigorous test of any immune intervention designed to prevent allograft rejection. To date, no single, clinically available immunosuppressant has been reported to induce long-term primary skin allograft survival in primates. We have previously shown that treatment with the humanized CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, humanized 5C8 (hu5C8), induces long-term renal allograft survival in nonhuman primates. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of hu5C8 in preventing primary skin allograft rejection in rhesus monkeys.

METHODS

Ten rhesus monkeys were transplanted with full-thickness skin allografts mismatched at both class I and class II major histocompatibility loci. Of these, two were given no treatment, five were treated with hu5C8 alone, and three received hu5C8 combined with whole blood donor-specific transfusion (DST). All recipients also received skin autografts for comparison. Animals were followed by inspection, serial biopsy, mixed lymphocyte culture, and alloantibody determination.

RESULTS

Treatment with hu5C8 alone or hu5C8 plus DST greatly prolonged allograft survival. Rejection occurred in the untreated group within 7 days. Mean allograft survival in the monotherapy hu5C8 group was >236 days and in the DST group was >202 days; these differences were not significant. Rejection eventually occurred in most animals. Allograft survival was not correlated with the development of T cell hyporesponsiveness in mixed lymphocyte culture. Rejection was not predicted by the development of donor-specific alloantibody.

CONCLUSION

These results show that treatment with the CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, hu5C8, greatly delays the onset of acute skin allograft rejection.