Weight-bearing radiographs in thoracolumbar fractures: do they influence management?

Weight-bearing gantry-free cone-beam CT of the lumbar spine: Image quality analysis and dose efficiency

PURPOSE

The effect of static forces under load limits the prognostic value of lumbar spine CT in a horizontal position. Using a gantry-free scanner architecture, this study was designed to assess the feasibility of weight-bearing cone-beam CT (CBCT) of the lumbar spine and to establish the most dose-effective combination of scan parameters.

METHODS

Eight formalin-fixated cadaveric specimens were examined with a gantry-free CBCT system in upright position with the aid of a dedicated positioning backstop. Cadavers were scanned with eight combinations of tube voltage (102 or 117 kV), detector entrance dose level (high or low), and frame rates (16 or 30 fps). Five radiologists independently analyzed datasets for overall image quality and posterior wall assessability. Additionally, image noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared based on region-of-interest (ROI) measurements in the gluteal muscles.

RESULTS

Radiation dose ranged from 6.8 ± 1.6 (117 kV, dose level low, 16 fps) to 24.3 ± 6.3 mGy (102 kV, dose level high, 30 fps). Both image quality and posterior wall assessability were favored with 30 over 16 fps (all p ≤ 0.008). In contrast, both tube voltage (all p > 0.999) and dose level (all p > 0.096) did not significantly impact reader assessment. Image noise decreased considerably with higher frame rates (all p ≤ 0.040), while SNR ranged from 0.56 ± 0.03 to 1.11 ± 0.30 without a significant difference between scan protocols (all p ≥ 0.060).

CONCLUSIONS

Employing an optimized scan protocol, weight-bearing gantry-free CBCT of the lumbar spine allows for diagnostic imaging at reasonable radiation dose.

Risk Factors for Cage Subsidence in Minimally Invasive Lateral Corpectomy for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

Introduction

This study aims to investigate risk factors for cage subsidence following minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods

Eight males and 13 females (77.2±6.0 years old) with osteoporotic vertebral fractures who underwent single corpectomy using a wide-footprint expandable cage with at least a 1-year follow-up were retrospectively included. The endplate cage (EC) angle was defined as the angle between the vertebral body's endplate and the cage's base on the cranial and caudal sides. A sagittal computed tomography scan was performed immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up, with cage subsidence defined as subsidence of ≥2 mm on the cranial or caudal side. Risk factors were analyzed by dividing cases into groups with (n=6) and without (n=15) cage subsidence.

Results

No significant differences were noted in age, bone mineral density, number of fixed vertebrae, sagittal parameters, preoperative and final kyphosis angle, amount of kyphosis angle correction, bone union, screw loosening, and number of other vertebral fractures preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively between the two groups. No difference was noted in cranial EC angle, but a significant difference was noted in caudal EC angle in the group with (10.7±4.1°) and without (4.7±4.2°) subsidence (P=0.008). Logistic regression analysis with the dependent variable as presence or absence of subsidence showed that caudal EC angle (>7.5°) was a significant factor (odds ratio: 20, 95% confidence interval: 1.655-241.7, P=0.018).

Conclusions

In minimally invasive lateral corpectomy for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, a cage tilted more than 7.5° to the caudal vertebral endplate is a risk factor for cage subsidence. The cage should be placed as perpendicular to the endplate as possible, especially to the caudal vertebral body, to avoid cage subsidence.

Comparison of pedicle screw fixation by four different posterior approaches for the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury

Purpose

This study was designed to compare the pedicle screw fixation by four different posterior approaches for the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury.

Methods

A total of 165 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurologic injury who received pedicle screw fixation by posterior approaches from February 2017 to August 2018 were enrolled in this study. They were further divided into the following four groups according to different posterior approaches: Open-C group (conventional open approach), Open-W group (Wiltse approach), MIS-F group (percutaneous approach with fluoroscopy guidance), and MIS-O group (percutaneous approach with O-arm navigation). The demographic data, clinical outcomes, and radiologic parameters were evaluated and compared among the four groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in age, gender, fracture segment, and follow-up time. The incision length, blood loss, hospital stay time, and VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) scores at the early stage of post-operation were the worst in the Open-C group. The MIS-O group showed significantly higher accuracy rate of pedicle position than other groups. The preoperative and postoperative AVH (anterior vertebral height) and VWA (vertebral wedge angle) obtain obvious correction in all patients immediately after and 1 year post-operation. No difference was found among the four groups at the final radiographic follow-up.

Conclusions

The four different posterior approaches are effective in treating type A thoracolumbar fractures in our study. Each approach has its own individual strengths and weaknesses and therefore requires comprehensive consideration prior to use. Proper approaches selection is critical to patients.

Immediate standing X-ray predicts the final vertebral collapse in elderly patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture

OBJECTIVE

To see if, in elderly patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fracture, standing X-rays with orthoses 24-48h after admission can predict vertebral collapse after consolidation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study endorsed by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age >65 years, acute thoracolumbar junction fracture due to fall, hospital admission, treatment with orthesis.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

various levels, suspected malignancy, non-immediate fracture or atraumatic.

VARIABLES

Farcy index (F), regional kyphosis (C: Cobb from cranial to caudal to broken vertebra) - both measured at admission (F0 and C0), at 24-48h in standing position with orthesis (F1 and C1) and 3 months, without brace (F2 and C2), collapse (increase from F0 to F1 -F0F1- and from F1 to F2 -F1F2-; as well as from C0 to C1 -C0C1- and from C1 to C2 -C1C2-), age and gender.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

R package.

RESULTS

Series of 40 patients, with a mean age of 75 years (66-87). Nine men and 31 women. Neither gender nor age were correlated with any variable. Six required surgery at follow-up. There were no differences in F1, C1, F0F1 or C0C1 between the six patients who required surgery and the other 34. Subsequently, data analysis was performed only for those patients who did not require surgery. The values obtained in the Farcy index were 8°+7° (F0), 12°+7° (F1) and 15°+8° (F2) and in kyphosis (three vertebrae, Cobb) they were: C0=8°+13°; C1=11.5°+14° and C2=13°+13°. There was a correlation of F2 with F0 and F1 (p<.001), with F0F1 (p=.038) and F1F2 (p=.007). The most powerful was with F1 (Rho Spearman=.889 (95% CI=.776-.947), with a Linear Regression line: F2=2.61288+F1×1.01237 (R²=.79). C2 was correlated with C0 and C1 (p<.001), especially with C1 (Rho Spearman=.952, 95% CI=.899-.977). Linear regression: C2=2.23371+C1×0.93758 (R²=.927).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate standing collapse predicts alignment at consolidation (3 months). It is therefore advisable to perform that radiography in the follow-up protocol.

[Translated article] Immediate standing X-ray predicts the final vertebral collapse in elderly patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture

OBJECTIVE

To see if, in elderly patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fracture, standing X-rays with orthoses 24-48h after admission can predict vertebral collapse after consolidation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study endorsed by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age >65 years, acute thoracolumbar junction fracture due to fall, hospital admission, treatment with orthesis.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

various levels, suspected malignancy, non-immediate fracture or atraumatic.

VARIABLES

Farcy index (F), regional kyphosis (C: Cobb from cranial to caudal to broken vertebra) - both measured at admission (F0 and C0), at 24-48h in standing position with orthesis (F1 and C1) and 3 months, without brace (F2 and C2), collapse (increase from F0 to F1 -F0F1- and from F1 to F2 -F1F2-; as well as from C0 to C1 -C0C1- and from C1 to C2 -C1C2-), age and gender.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

R package.

RESULTS

Series of 40 patients, with a mean age of 75 years (66-87). Nine men and 31 women. Neither gender nor age were correlated with any variable. Six required surgery at follow-up. There were no differences in F1, C1, F0F1 or C0C1 between the six patients who required surgery and the other 34. Subsequently, data analysis was performed only for those patients who did not require surgery. The values obtained in the Farcy index were 8°+7° (F0), 12°+7° (F1) and 15°+8° (F2) and in kyphosis (three vertebrae, Cobb) they were: C0=8°+13°; C1=11.5°+14° and C2=13°+13°. There was a correlation of F2 with F0 and F1 (p<.001), with F0F1 (p=.038) and F1F2 (p=.007). The most powerful was with F1 (Rho Spearman=.889, 95% CI=.776-.947), with a linear regression line: F2=2.61288+F1×1.01237 (R²=.79). C2 was correlated with C0 and C1 (p<.001), especially with C1 (Rho Spearman=.952, 95% CI=.899-.977). Linear regression: C2=2.23371+C1×0.93758 (R²=.927).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate standing collapse predicts alignment at consolidation (3 months). It is therefore advisable to perform that radiography in the follow-up protocol.

Vertebral Body Height Changes in Acute Symptomatic Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Treated with Vertebral Cement Augmentation-Which Factors Affect Vertebral Body Height during Follow-up? A Multiple Linear Regression Study

Changes in vertebral body height depend on various factors which were analyzed in isolation and not as a whole. The aim of this study is to analyze what factors might influence the restoration of the vertebral body height after vertebral augmentation. We analyzed 48 patients (108 vertebrae) with osteoporotic vertebral fractures who underwent vertebral augmentation when a conservative treatment proved to be unsatisfactory. The analyses were carried out at the time of the fracture, during surgery (pre-cementation and post-cementation), at the first medical check-up (6 weeks post-surgery) and at the last medical check-up. The average vertebral height was measured, and the differences from the preoperative values were calculated at each timepoint. A Pearson correlation coefficient and a linear multivariable regression were carried out at different timepoints. The time since the vertebral fracture was 60.4 ± 41.7 days. The patients' average age was 73.8 ± 7 years. The total follow-up period was 1.43 ± 1 year. After vertebral cementation, there was an increase in the vertebral body height of +0.3 cm (13.6%). During the post-operative follow-up, there was a progressive collapse of the vertebral body, and the pre-surgical height was reached. The factors that most influenced the vertebral height restoration were: a grade III collapse, an intervertebral-vacuum-cleft (IVVC) and the use of a flexible trocar before cement augmentation. The factor that negatively influenced the vertebral body height restoration was the location of the thoracolumbar spine.

Influence on Therapeutic Decision-Making of Supine and Standing Radiographs after Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fracture in the Elderly

Background A standing X-ray is recommended for decision-making relative to the therapy for a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture (TLF). However, standing X-ray management can be demanding in elderly patients because of pain. The goal of this study was to determine whether supine radiograph is sufficient for proper therapeutic decision-making in patients older than 65 years with acute stable traumatic TLF.

Methods Patients older than 65 years who came to the emergency department diagnosed with an acute and stable traumatic vertebral fracture between T10 and L3 (both included) were included in the study. Initially, all the patients were studied with a supine radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan. If the TLF was stable, a standing radiograph was performed. Segmental kyphosis (SK) and visual analog scale (VAS) score were collected and compared in both the supine and standing X-ray projections.

Results Twenty-seven patients with a mean age of 76.39 (range: 65–93) years were included; most were females. The mean supine SK was 10.14degrees (SD±7.22degrees). It increased to 12.97 (SD±8.61degrees) in the standing projection (p<0.001). In 37.1% of the patients, the SK increased from 13.22degrees (SD±7.21degrees) in supine X-ray to 19.96degrees (SD±5.34degrees) in the standing position in this group. When the initial supine projection showed an SK of ≥10degrees, the mean SK observed in the standing X-ray increased to 20.5degrees (SD±5.30, p=0.321).

Conclusion Stable traumatic TLF in patients older than 65 years showing ≥10degrees of SK in supine radiography may benefit from a standing radiography to make a proper therapeutic decision.

Self-Reduction in Proximal Humerus Fractures through Upright Patient Positioning: Is It up to Gravity?

Background: The self-reduction in proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains a poorly explored myth, and it was rarely investigated in the past. One of the oldest hypotheses suggests that gravity and the weight of the affected arm alone are driving forces, which facilitate a self-reducing potential in PHFs. However, thus far, clear radiographic evidence for this theory is missing in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the immediate effect of upright patient positioning on self-reducing of PHFs. Methods: Between November 2019 and November 2020, seven consecutively bedridden but mentally competent patients were admitted to our emergency department with an acute proximal humerus fracture. Within routinely attempts of closed reductions under the control of an image converter (C-arm), immobile patients were mobilized into an upright sitting position on a stretcher while the affected arm was immobilized in a sling. Fluoroscopic controls were performed before and after upright positioning. Changes in the head-shaft angle (HSA), as well as the medial hinge index (MHI), were determined on plain true anteroposterior (AP) fluoroscopic images. Results: In all cases, upright patient positioning had an immediate self-reducing effect. This effect could be seen in five out of seven cases for both HSA and MHI. Changes in HSA and MHI averaged 21.2° and 0.25, respectively. Mean deviation from an ideal, anatomic HSA of 135° decreased through upright positioning from 25.5° to 13.8°. Mean deviation from an ideal, anatomic MHI of 1 decreased through upright positioning from 0.28 to 0.19. Conclusions: Upright patient positioning might contribute immediately to the self-reduction in PHF through the force of gravity. This underlines the importance of being aware of patients’ position when interpreting X-ray images within treatment decision-making processes.

Difference in the Cobbs Angle Between Standing and Supine Position as a Prognostic Factor After Vertebral Augmentation in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Objective

We retrospectively analyzed patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) undergoing vertebral augmentation to compare the Cobb angle changes in the supine and standing positions and the clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively extracted the data of OVCF patients who underwent vertebral augmentation. Back pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Supine and standing radiographs were assessed before treatment to determine the Cobb angle and compression ratio. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff to predict favorable outcomes after vertebral augmentation.

Results

A total of 249 patients were included. We observed a statistically significant increase in the VAS score change with increasing Cobb angle and compression ratio (p < 0.001), and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a difference in the Cobb angle (odds ratio [OR], 1.27) and compression ratio (OR, 1.12) were the independent risk factors for predicting short-term favorable outcomes after vertebral augmentation. In addition, we found that the difference in the Cobb angle (OR, 1.05) was the only factor for predicting midterm favorable outcomes after vertebral augmentation. The optimal cutoff value of the difference in the Cobb angle for predicting midterm favorable outcomes was 35.526°.

Conclusion

We found that the midterm clinical outcome after vertebral augmentation was better when there was a difference of approximately 35% or more in the Cobb angle between the standing and supine positions. Surgeons should pay attention to the difference in the Cobb angle depending on the posture when deciding to perform vertebral augmentation in patients with OVCFs.

Utility of upright radiographs in traumatic thoracolumbar fracture management

Background

It is common practice to use a combination approach of computed tomography (CT) scan followed by upright radiographs when assessing traumatic thoracolumbar (TL) vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of upright spine radiographs in the setting of traumatic TL fracture management. Our null hypothesis is that upright TL radiographs rarely change management of acute vertebral fractures.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients with an initial plan of non-operative management for a TL fracture between January 2014 and June 2020 at a single Level 1 trauma center. Patients were followed from time of initial consult to either conversion to surgery (operative) or last available outpatient follow up imaging (non-operative). Lateral kyphotic angle of the fractured vertebra and anterior vertebral body height% loss on initial CT, first upright radiograph, and endpoint upright radiograph imaging were measured. Measurements were compared between and within operative and non-operative groups using t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests when appropriate. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The study included 70 patients with an average age of 54 years and 37 (52.9%) were women. Six (8.6%) of 70 patients had a change from non-operative to operative management based on upright radiographs. The mean (standard deviation) change in degrees of kyphosis from CT scan to first X-ray was 4.6 (7.0) in the non-operative group and 11.5 (8.1) in the operative group (P = 0.03). Delta degrees of kyphosis from CT scan to endpoint X-ray was 6.4 (9.0) and 16.2 (6.2) in the non-operative and operative groups, respectively (P = 0.01). In the operative group, mean degrees of kyphosis increased from 1.6 (7.6) in initial CT to 13.1 (8.9) in first X-ray (P = 0.02). First X-ray mean anterior body height% loss was 37.5 (17.6) and 53.2 (16.1) in the non-operative and operative groups, respectively (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Upright radiographs are useful in guiding traumatic vertebral fracture management decisions. Larger studies are needed to determine the degree of change in kyphosis between CT and first standing radiograph that is suggestive of operative management.

Trial registration number and date of registration

Not applicable.

Equivalent values between anterior vertebral height, wedge ratio, and wedge angle in osteoporotic vertebral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral mobility (V-mobility) has been used to diagnose fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs), and determine or predict bone union by setting cutoff values for these purposes. V-mobility is defined as the difference in shape of vertebral bodies between lateral radiographs taken in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions. The parameters for V-mobility have varied in previous reports among anterior vertebral height (Ha, mm), wedge ratio (WR, %), and wedge angle (WA, degrees). The present study aimed to clarify WR and WA equivalent to Ha of 1.0 mm, and to compare the reported cutoff values for V-mobility presented as Ha, WR, or WA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lateral radiographs of 446 normal vertebrae (grade 0) and 146 deformed vertebrae (grade 1-3) from T11 to L2 were obtained from 183 female patients aged > 60 years. WR (%) values equivalent to Ha of 1.0 mm were calculated by Ha (1.0 mm)/Hp × 100 (Hp: posterior vertebral height). Corresponding WA values were calculated by trigonometric function using vertebral dimensions.

RESULTS

The mean WR values equivalent to Ha of 1.0 mm in the vertebrae from T11 to L2 were 3.2%, 3.2%, 3.5%, and 3.7% for grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the corresponding WA values were 1.6°, 1.6°, 1.5°, and 1.4°.

CONCLUSION

The equivalent values for V-mobility presented as Ha, WR, and WA were obtained. The mean WR and WA values equivalent to Ha of 1.0 mm in grade 1-3 vertebrae were 3.5% and 1.5°, respectively.

Complications of a Unilateral Nondisplaced Cervical Facet Fracture in a Patient With Previously Noninstrumented Anterior Cervical Fusion

Fused motion segments have been documented to alter the biomechanics of the cervical spine and compromise its stability. Current literature describes a growing association between the presence of prior noninstrumented fused cervical segments and the predisposition to acute, traumatic instability at adjacent levels. We present the case of a stable cervical spine fracture pattern in a patient with a history of multilevel noninstrumented anterior cervical spine fusion-initially presenting as a small, nondisplaced unilateral facet fracture that ultimately progressed to overt displacement with kyphosis resulting in acute cervical pain and instability. The patient underwent urgent open reduction and instrumented posterior fixation. We discuss the challenges associated with a timely diagnosis and offer insight into the surgical management of this rare yet potentially catastrophic complication.

IMPORTANCE OF RADIOGRAPHY IN ORTHOSTATISM IN THE CONDUCT OF THORACOLOMBAR TRANSITION FRACTURES

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the importance of radiography in the orthostatic position in the initial assessment of patients with thoracolumbar transition fractures and whether this image changes the surgical indication. Methods: Medical records and imaging tests of patients treated for thoracolumbar transition fractures from June 2018 to June 2019 were evaluated. Trauma patients between 18 and 60 years of age with fractures of T10 to L3 who had been indicated for conservative treatment were included. Cases of fractures considered unstable were excluded. Radiographs were taken with the patient in the supine position (supine X-ray), computed tomography (CT), and orthostatic radiography (orthostatic X-ray). Segmental kyphosis and degree of wedging were evaluated. The measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test. The McNemar test was used to assess changes in conduct according to the criteria for surgical indication (kyphosis ≥ 25 ° and wedging ≥ 50%). Results: Fifty patients were evaluated, nine of whom (18%) were indicated for a change of conduct according to the orthostatic examinations and were submitted to surgical treatment. Vertebral kyphosis increased by 40.6% (p <0.001). The wedging increased by 25.62% (p <0.0001). Conclusion: Eighteen percent of the total number of patients who did not present instability criteria in radiographs in the supine position satisfied at least one of these criteria when the orthostatic X-ray was performed. Level of evidence 3B; Retrospective case series study.

Orthosis in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes of acute traumatic thoracolumbar fractures in skeletally mature patients treated with orthosis, versus no immobilization.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Orthosis is traditionally used in conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. However, recent studies suggest no benefit, and a possible negative impact in recovery.

METHODS

Databases were searched from inception to June 2019. Studies were selected in two phases by two blinded reviewers; disagreements were solved by consensus. Inclusion criteria were: RCT; only patients with acute traumatic thoracolumbar fractures; primary conservative treatment; comparison between orthosis and no orthosis. Exclusion criteria were inclusion of nonacute fractures, patients with other significant known diseases and comparison of groups different than use of an orthosis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Fixed-effects models were used upon no heterogeneity, and random-effects model in the remaining cases. A previous plan for extraction of radiological (kyphosis progression; loss of anterior height) and clinical (pain; disability; length of stay) outcomes was applied. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Eight articles/five studies were included (267 participants). None reported significant differences in pain, kyphosis progression, and loss of anterior height. One reported a better ODI with orthosis at 12 but not at 24 weeks. No other study reported differences in disability. All authors concluded an equivalence between treatments.Meta-analysis showed a significant increase of 3.47days (95% confidence interval 1.35-5.60) in mean admission time in orthosis group. No differences were found in kyphosis at 6 and 12 months; kyphosis progression between 0 to 6 and 0 to 12 months; loss of anterior height 0 to 6 months; VAS for pain at 6 months; VAS change 0 to 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Orthosis seems to add no benefit in conservative treatment of acute thoracolumbar fractures. This should be considered in guidelines and reviews of health care policies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The Conservative Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures

BACKGROUND

The conservative treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures is often not clearly defined.

METHODS

This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science databases for publications up to February 2018 dealing with the conservative treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. The search initially yielded 3345 hits, of which 35 were suitable for use in this review.

RESULTS

It can be concluded from the available original clinical research on the subject, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that the primary diagnostic evaluation should be with plain x-rays, in the standing position if possible. If a fracture is suspected on the plain films, computed tomography (CT) is indicated. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is additionally advisable if there is a burst fracture. The spinal deformity resulting from the fracture should be quantified in terms of the Cobb angle. The choice of a conservative or operative treatment strategy is based on the primary stability of the fracture, the degree of deformity, the presence or absence of disc injury, and the patient's clinical state. Our analysis of the three RCTs implies that early functional therapy without a corset should be performed, although treatment in a corset may be appropriate to control pain. Follow-up x-rays should be obtained after mobilization and at one week, three weeks, six weeks, and twelve weeks.

CONCLUSION

Further comparative studies of the indications for surgery and specific conservative treatment modalities would be desirable.

The Unstable Spine: A Surgeon's Perspective

Instability of the spine is a complex clinical entity that exists on a wide spectrum encompassing many aspects of spinal pathology including traumatic, neoplastic, infectious, and degenerative processes. The importance of determining stability is paramount in the decision-making process regarding the need for operative or nonoperative care. Defining clinical instability can be a challenging and requires careful attention to the pathology involved, findings of necessary imaging, and a thorough clinical exam. Several classification systems have been developed to aid in surgical decision making, but certain limitations exist. Various imaging modalities play a crucial role in the evaluation of suspected instability. Computed tomography is the initial imaging modality of choice in the traumatic setting. Magnetic resonance imaging is an important adjunct in the setting of suspected ligamentous injury and the modality of choice in suspected infectious and neoplastic processes. Upright radiographs can be particularly useful in the setting of acute or subacute instability to glean information about how the spine responds to gravity and weightbearing. The clinical exam is also of critical importance in the determination of stability. The presence of a neurologic deficit is highly suggestive of a potentially unstable spine and appropriate spinal precautions should be maintained until instability and injury has been ruled out. Certain clinical entities, such as ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, are at high risk for instability particularly in the traumatic setting. In these situations, the spine should be considered unstable until proven otherwise. Ultimately, the determination of spinal stability, and subsequent need for surgical treatment, should be based on the individual case. Combining information from the clinical exam and imaging findings, including upright radiographs when appropriate, allows for the appropriated determination of spinal stability.

Treatment of Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)

STUDY DESIGN

consensus paper with systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures based on systematic review of current literature and consensus of several spine surgery experts.

METHODS

The project was initiated in September 2008 and published in Germany in 2011. It was redone in 2017 based on systematic literature review, including new AOSpine classification. Members of the expert group were recruited from all over Germany working in hospitals of all levels of care. In total, the consensus process included 9 meetings and 20 hours of video conferences.

RESULTS

As regards existing studies with highest level of evidence, a clear recommendation regarding treatment (operative vs conservative) or regarding type of surgery (posterior vs anterior vs combined anterior-posterior) cannot be given. Treatment has to be indicated individually based on clinical presentation, general condition of the patient, and radiological parameters. The following specific parameters have to be regarded and are proposed as morphological modifiers in addition to AOSpine classification: sagittal and coronal alignment of spine, degree of vertebral body destruction, stenosis of spinal canal, and intervertebral disc lesion. Meanwhile, the recommendations are used as standard algorithm in many German spine clinics and trauma centers.

CONCLUSION

Clinical presentation and general condition of the patient are basic requirements for decision making. Additionally, treatment recommendations offer the physician a standardized, reproducible, and in Germany commonly accepted algorithm based on AOSpine classification and 4 morphological modifiers.

Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Thoracolumbar burst fractures are high-energy vertebral injuries, which commonly can be treated nonoperatively. Consideration of the injury pattern, extent of comminution, neurological status, and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex may help determine whether operative management is appropriate. Several classification systems are contingent upon these factors to assist with clinical decision-making. A multitude of operative procedures have been shown to have good radiographic and clinical outcomes with extended follow-up, and treatment choice should be based on the individual's clinical and radiographic presentation.

Urinary Pentosidine levels negatively associates with trabecular bone scores in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pentosidine levels were higher in diabetic patients with vertebral fractures. Trabecular bone scores were negatively associated with pentosidine levels in diabetic patients only. Our results provide further evidence that AGEs are associated with the pathogenesis of bone fragility in patients with T2DM.

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with fracture risk. Pentosidine, an advanced glycation end product (AGE), is associated with prevalent vertebral fractures (VFs) in patients with T2DM. Trabecular bone score (TBS) has been proposed as an index of bone microarchitecture associated with bone quality. This study evaluated the associations of urine pentosidine and TBS in T2DM and non-T2DM groups.

METHODS

A total of 112 T2DM patients and 62 non-T2DM subjects were enrolled. TBS was calculated using TBS insight® software (version 2.1). Pentosidine levels were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography method. We compared the BMD, TBS, and pentosidine levels between those with and without VFs with or without adjustment for age and sex. The association with TBS, lumbar spine BMD, and pentosidine levels were also evaluated in both T2DM and non-T2DM groups.

RESULTS

Pentosidine levels were significantly higher in T2DM patients with VFs. TBSs were significantly lower in patients with T2DM and VFs. In non-diabetic patients, there were no significant differences in TBS and pentosidine levels for those with and without VFs after adjustment for age and sex. Pentosidine levels were negatively associated with TBS only in patients with T2DM. In multivariate stepwise regression analysis, pentosidine levels were significantly associated with TBS in patients with T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS and pentosidine could be used as a method to assess bone quality to identify T2DM patients at risk of VFs. Our results also provide further evidence that AGEs are associated with the pathogenesis of bone fragility in patients with T2DM.

Thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment: A review of diagnosis and treatment

An appropriate protocol and unified management of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment has not been well defined.

This review attempts to elucidate some controversies regarding diagnostic tools, the ability to define the most appropriate treatment of classification systems and the evidence for conservative and surgical methods based on the recent literature.

Cite this article: Vilà-Canet G, García de Frutos A, Covaro A, Ubierna MT, Caceres E. Thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment: a review of diagnosis and treatment. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:332-338. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000029

Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study

This study revealed the time course of osteoporotic vertebral fracture by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification. Signal changes were associated with the compression degree and mobility of the fractured vertebral body. This classification showed sufficient reliability in categorizing magnetic resonance imaging findings of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). This study investigated the time course of OVFs by MRI using a simple classification.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study was performed from 2012 to 2015. Consecutive patients with ≤2-week-old OVFs were enrolled in 11 institutions. MRI was performed at enrollment and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Signal changes on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI, and short τ inversion recovery (STIR) were classified according to signal intensity. Height and angular motion of vertebral bodies were also measured.

RESULTS

The 6-month follow-up was completed by 153 patients. At enrollment, fractured vertebrae signal changes were 43 % diffuse and 57 % confined low on T1WI; on T2WI, 56, 24, and 5 % were confined low, high, and diffuse low, respectively; on STIR, 100 % were high. On T1WI, diffuse low remained most common (90 % at 1 month and 60 % at 3 months) until 6 and 12 months, when most were confined low (54 and 52 %, respectively). On T2WI, confined low remained most common (decreasing to 41 % at 12 months). On STIR, high signal change was shown in 98, 87, and 64 % at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 3, 6, and 12 months, diffuse low signal change was associated with significantly lower vertebral height, and high signal change was associated with significantly greater angular motion.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI signal changes were associated with the compression degree and angular motion of fractured vertebrae. This classification showed sufficient reliability in categorizing MRI findings of OVFs.

Acute traumatic intraosseous fluid sign predisposes to dynamic fracture mobility

The intraosseous fluid sign (IFS) in chronic osteoporotic vertebral fractures is attributed to fluid accumulation within non-healing intervertebral clefts. IFS can also be seen in acute traumatic fractures, not previously described. We hypothesize a pathophysiological mechanism for the acute traumatic intraosseous fluid sign (ATIFS) and its predisposition to dynamic fracture mobility with axial loading on upright radiographs. Retrospective analysis was performed of 41 acute thoracic and lumbar compression or stable burst fractures with both supine CT and upright plain films completed within 1 week of each other. The presence of an intravertebral cleft with fluid attenuation and vertebral body height loss was assessed on CT scans. Changes in the fractured vertebral body height and angulation were measured on upright radiographs. The ATIFS was identified in 18 (44%) of the 41 acute fractures. Mean kyphotic angle increase was significantly greater (p = 0.000) for ATIFS fractures (8.2°, SD ±4.2) than fractures without ATIFS (1.6°, SD ±3.4). There was significantly greater mean anterior (p = 0.0009) and central (p = 0.026) height loss in ATIFS fractures (4.3 mm, SD ±3.76 and 1.89 mm, SD ±4.44, respectively) compared to fractures without ATIFS (0.59 mm, SD ±2.24 and -0.52 mm, SD ±2.01, respectively). The IFS can be seen in acute traumatic vertebral fractures and show dynamic mobility. These ATIFS fractures show statistically significant greater mean height loss ratio differences and have significantly greater changes in kyphotic angulation on upright imaging when compared to fractures without ATIFS.

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and TBS-Adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool are Potential Supplementary Tools for the Discrimination of Morphometric Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with fracture risk but, paradoxically, greater bone mineral density (BMD). The trabecular bone score (TBS) has been proposed as an index of bone microarchitecture associated with bone quality. This study compared the performance of TBS, BMD, and original and TBS-adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) scores in the discrimination of vertebral fractures (VFs) in T2DM patients. This retrospective study enrolled 169 Korean postmenopausal women with T2DM. Lateral plain radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine were taken. Lumbar spine and femur neck BMDs were obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). TBS was obtained using the TBS iNsight software program (Med-Imaps, Pessac, France) with BMD DXA images (L1-L4). VFs were diagnosed when at least 1 of the 3 height measurements was decreased by >25% compared to the nearest uncompressed vertebral body. Among the subjects, 34 women (20.1%) had VFs. Significantly lower TBS (p = 0.008) and higher TBS-adjusted FRAX scores were shown (p = 0.019) in the group with VFs compared to the group without VFs. In contrast, there were no significant differences in BMD and original FRAX scores between the 2 groups. Odds ratios (ORs) per standard deviation decrease in BMD or TBS and per standard deviation increase in the FRAX score were estimated with adjustment for age. TBS (OR = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.7, p = 0.011) and TBS-adjusted FRAX score (OR = 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-3.5, p = 0.020) showed statistically significant ORs but the others did not. TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX could be supplementary tools to discriminate osteoporotic fractures in T2DM.

Anterior corpectomy via the mini-open, extreme lateral, transpsoas approach combined with short-segment posterior fixation for single-level traumatic lumbar burst fractures: analysis of health-related quality of life outcomes and patient satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

The authors present clinical outcome data and satisfaction of patients who underwent minimally invasive vertebral body corpectomy and cage placement via a mini-open, extreme lateral, transpsoas approach and posterior short-segment instrumentation for lumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

Patients with unstable lumbar burst fractures who underwent corpectomy and anterior column reconstruction via a mini-open, extreme lateral, transpsoas approach with short-segment posterior fixation were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic information, operative parameters, perioperative radiographic measurements, and complications were analyzed. Patient-reported outcome instruments (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12]) and an anterior scar-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire were recorded at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (7 men, 5 women, average age 42 years, range 22-68 years) met the inclusion criteria. Lumbar corpectomies with anterior column support were performed (L-1, n = 8; L-2, n = 2; L-3, n = 2) and supplemented with short-segment posterior instrumentation (4 open, 8 percutaneous). Four patients had preoperative neurological deficits, all of which improved after surgery. No new neurological complications were noted. The anterior incision on average was 6.4 cm (range 5-8 cm) in length, caused mild pain and disability, and was aesthetically acceptable to the large majority of patients. Three patients required chest tube placement for pleural violation, and 1 patient required reoperation for cage subsidence/hardware failure. Average clinical follow-up was 38 months (range 16-68 months), and average radiographic follow-up was 37 months (range 6-68 months). Preoperative lumbar lordosis and focal lordosis were significantly improved/maintained after surgery. Patients were satisfied with their outcomes, had minimal/moderate disability (average ODI score 20, range 0-52), and had good physical (SF-12 physical component score 41.7% ± 10.4%) and mental health outcomes (SF-12 mental component score 50.2% ± 11.6%) after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior corpectomy and cage placement via a mini-open, extreme lateral, transpsoas approach supplemented by short-segment posterior instrumentation is a safe, effective alternative to conventional approaches in the treatment of single-level unstable burst fractures and is associated with excellent functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Evidence-based management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of nonoperative management

OBJECT

The overall evidence for nonoperative management of patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures is unknown. There is no agreement on the optimal method of conservative treatment. Recent randomized controlled trials that have compared nonoperative to operative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits yielded conflicting results. By assessing the level of evidence on conservative management through validated methodologies, clinicians can assess the availability of critically appraised literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of evidence for the use of conservative management in traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the English literature over the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE). The inclusion criteria consisted of burst fractures resulting from a traumatic mechanism, and fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine. The exclusion criteria consisted of osteoporotic burst fractures, pathological burst fractures, and fractures located in the cervical spine. Of the studies meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, any study in which nonoperative treatment was used was included in this review.

RESULTS

One thousand ninety-eight abstracts were reviewed and 447 papers met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of which 45 were included in this review. In total, there were 2 Level-I, 7 Level-II, 9 Level-III, 25 Level-IV, and 2 Level-V studies. Of the 45 studies, 16 investigated conservative management techniques, 20 studies compared operative to nonoperative treatments, and 9 papers investigated the prognosis of conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 9 high-level studies (Levels I-II) that have investigated the conservative management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. In neurologically intact patients, there is no superior conservative management technique over another as supported by a high level of evidence. The conservative technique can be based on patient and surgeon preference, comfort, and access to resources. A high level of evidence demonstrated similar functional outcomes with conservative management when compared with open surgical operative management in patients who were neurologically intact. The presence of a neurological deficit is not an absolute contraindication for conservative treatment as supported by a high level of evidence. However, the majority of the literature excluded patients with neurological deficits. More evidence is needed to further classify the appropriate burst fractures for conservative management to decrease variables that may impact the prognosis.

Dynamics of interpedicular widening in spinal burst fractures: an in vitro investigation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal burst fractures are a significant cause of spinal instability and neurologic impairment. Although evidence suggests that the neurologic trauma arises during the dynamic phase of fracture, the biomechanics underpinning the phenomenon has yet to be fully explained. Interpedicular widening (IPW) is a distinctive feature of the fracture but, despite the association with the occurrence of neurologic deficit, little is known about its biomechanics.

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive in vitro study on spinal burst fracture, with special attention on the dynamics of IPW.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental measurements in combination with computed tomography scanning were used to quantitatively investigate the biomechanics of burst fracture in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

Twelve human three-adjacent-vertebra segments were tested to induce burst fracture. Impact was delivered through a drop-weight tower, whereas IPW was continuously recorded by two displacement transducers. Computed tomography scanning aided quantifying canal occlusion (CO) and evaluating sample anatomy and fracture appearance. Two levels of energy were delivered to two groups: high energy (HE) and low energy (LE).

RESULTS

No difference was found between HE and LE in terms of the residual IPW (ie, post-fracture), maximum IPW, or CO (median 20.2%). Whereas IPW was not found to be correlated with CO, a moderate correlation was found between the maximum and the residual IPW. At the fracture onset, IPW reached a maximum median value of 15.8% in approximately 20 to 25 milliseconds. After the transient phase, the pedicles were recoiled to a median residual IPW of 4.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides for the first time insight on how IPW actually evolves during the fracture onset. In addition, our results may help shedding more light on the mechanical initiation of the fracture.

Efficacy of the dynamic radiographs for diagnosing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures

We investigated the efficacy of dynamic radiographs for diagnosing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) compared with supine radiographs or sitting radiographs alone. Evaluation of the dynamic radiographs was superior to the other evaluations. Dynamic radiographs provide a convenient and useful method of diagnosing acute OVFs.

INTRODUCTION

Identifying acute OVFs on plain radiographs is difficult. We studied a new approach to identify acute OVFs on the basis of fracture mobility.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective radiographic analysis of 472 acute OVFs (<3 weeks after onset), which were diagnosed on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging of T5 through L5 (a total of 5,239 vertebrae). Supine lateral radiographs were compared with sitting lateral radiographs to determine the presence or absence of mobility. Vertebrae showing changes in the vertebral body height were diagnosed as acute OVFs. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy on the basis of comparative supine and sitting lateral radiographs and compared it with that of radiographs obtained in the supine or the sitting position alone.

RESULTS

Of the 472 acute OVFs diagnosed, 313 (66 %) exhibited vertebral mobility on supine lateral and sitting lateral radiographs. Correct diagnoses of acute OVFs or no acute OVFs were made in 4,883 vertebrae. There were 159 unreadable OVFs (3 %), and 197 previous OVFs (4 %) were misdiagnosed as acute OVFs. The sensitivity was 66 % and the specificity was 96 %. Evaluation of the mobility of acute OVFs in the supine and the sitting position was superior to evaluation using radiographs in either the supine or the sitting position alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic radiographs provide a convenient way to identify acute OVFs.

Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Traumatic fractures of the spine are most common at the thoracolumbar junction and can be a source of great disability.

PURPOSE

To review the most current information regarding the pathophysiology, injury pattern, treatment options, and outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Relevant articles, textbook chapters, and abstracts covering thoracolumbar spine fractures with and without neurologic deficit from 1960 to the present were reviewed.

RESULTS

The thoracolumbar spine represents a unique system from a skeletal as well as neurological standpoint. The rigid rib-bearing thoracic spine articulates with the more mobile lumbar spine at the thoracolumbar junction (T10 - L2), the site of most fractures. A complete examination includes a careful neurologic examination of both motor and sensory systems. CT scans best describe bony detail while MRI is most efficient at describing soft tissues and neurological structures. The most recent classification system is that of the new Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score. The different fracture types include compression fractures, burst fractures - both stable and unstable -, flexion-distraction injuries and fracture dislocations. Their treatment, both operative and non-operative depends on the degree of bony compromise, neurological involvement, and the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex. Minimally invasive approaches to the care of thoracolumbar injuries have become more popular, thus, the evidence regarding their efficacy is presented. Finally, the treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine is reviewed, including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, their risks and controversies, and senile burst fractures, as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracolumbar spine fractures remain a significant source of potential morbidity. Advances in treatment have minimized the invasiveness of our surgery and in certain stable situations, eliminated it all together.

The correlation between vertebral wedge-shaped changes in X-ray imaging at supine and standing positions and the efficacy of operative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fracture in the elderly

STUDY DESIGN

By analyzing a large number of surgical patients, we identified the roles of wedge-shaped changes in related surgeries.

OBJECTIVES

To illustrate the relevance of vertebral wedge-shaped changes in X-ray imaging at supine and standing positions in patients with percutaneous kyphoplasty as well as the postoperative effect.

SETTING

All patient data were collected from a hospital in China.

METHODS

Between June 2006 and May 2010, 77 surgical patients (9 men and 68 women) with wedge-shaped compression fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into group A (ΔWR2.5%) and group B (ΔWR<2.5%) according to the dynamic changes in the percentage of vertebral body wedge-shaped variable ratio (WR) at supine and standing positions. The intensity of back pain in different positions pre- and postoperatively was evaluated with a visual analog pain scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The WRs in both standing and supine positions were significantly reduced by kyphoplasty in both groups A and B. In agreement with the improvement in WRs, the VAS was significantly decreased in three positions for patients in group A and in turning over and standing position for patients in group B. With respect to ΔWR changes, group B revealed significantly lower values compared with group A preoperatively (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups A and B postoperatively and at 1-month follow-up (P=0.179 and P=0.558, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in symptoms after kyphoplasty is better in patients with wedge-shaped changes in supine and standing positions, and the efficacy of height restoration of the spine would be better in unstable vertebrae by balloon dilatation.

The importance of morphometric radiographic vertebral assessment for the detection of patients who need pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal diabetic Korean women

Many diabetic patients with vertebral fractures remain undiagnosed and untreated. We found that more than two-thirds of osteoporotic diabetic women could not be identified for pharmacological treatment according to the NOF guidelines if without radiographic vertebral assessment. This study shows the importance of radiographic vertebral assessment for identifying patients who need treatment for osteoporosis in diabetic women.

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of vertebral fracture (VF) is important for identifying patients who need pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. However, many patients with vertebral fractures remain undiagnosed and untreated. This study evaluated the number of patients with VFs who would be unrecognized as candidates for osteoporosis treatments according to the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) Clinician’s Guidelines to the Treatment of Osteoporosis, among postmenopausal diabetic Korean women without spinal imaging.

METHODS

A total of 873 postmenopausal diabetic women were enrolled. Lateral plain radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine and total hip BMD were obtained. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) probability was computed using the algorithm available online at http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX (South Korea version). The subjects with and without VFs were classified into candidates for osteoporosis treatment [Tx+by NOF] and not candidates for osteoporosis treatment [Tx−by NOF] according to the NOF pharmacologic treatment guidelines, regardless of the presence of VFs.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of postmenopausal diabetic womenhad morphometric VFs. Among the subjects with morphometric VFs, only 2% of the patients had previously diagnosed VFs by medical doctors. In addition, 73.6% of the patients with VFs were not included in the [Tx+by NOF] group, given the assumption of no radiographic diagnosis of VFs.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to increased risk of VFs in postmenopausal Korean women with type 2 diabetes mellitus, radiographic vertebral assessment would be useful for the clinical identification of osteoporosis and fractures.

Importância da realização de radiografias em posição ortostática na avaliação inicial de pacientes com fraturas toracolombares

OBJETIVO: o manejo das fraturas toracolombares estáveis é controverso, especialmente em pacientes sem déficit funcional. Este estudo questiona o motivo de ser realizada uma avaliação das imagens apenas na posição supina, uma vez que, paradoxalmente, o tratamento conservador inclui o ortostatismo precoce. O propósito deste estudo é determinar se a realização de radiografias em posição ortostática influencia na definição do tratamento dos pacientes com fraturas torácicas e lombares classificadas como tipo "A" da AO-ASIF. MÉTODOS: de janeiro de 2007 a novembro de 2008, foram avaliados pacientes portadores de fraturas torácicas e lombares por meio de radiografias em decúbito e tomografia computadorizada, visando identificar sinais de instabilidade. As fraturas classificadas radiograficamente como tipo "A" da AO-ASIF, inicialmente por tratamento conservador, foram submetidas à realização de radiografias em ortostatismo sem o colete ortótico na fase aguda e seus parâmetros radiológicos foram reavaliados. RESULTADOS: foram incluídos neste estudo 59 pacientes com fraturas toracolombares estáveis (T11 a L4), e todos toleraram o exame. A cifose vertebral aumentou 46,8%. O colapso anterior aumentou 15,52%. Três destes pacientes (5,1%) receberam a indicação cirúrgica após radiografias em ortostatismo por apresentarem critérios de instabilidade. CONCLUSÕES: a realização das radiografias em ortostatismo mostrou-se eficiente na identificação de pacientes com instabilidade ainda não manifesta e capaz de predizer a evolução satisfatória durante o tratamento conservador, além de ser um exame diagnóstico seguro, de fácil aplicabilidade e com baixo custo. Neste estudo, um total de 5,1% dos pacientes tiveram seu tratamento conservador alterado para o cirúrgico.

Nonoperative treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective randomized study of different treatment options

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare nonoperative treatment methods for traumatic thoracic and lumbar compression fractures and burst fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up.

SETTING

Two general hospitals in the Netherlands.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a traumatic thoracic or lumbar spine fracture, without neurologic damage, with less than 50% loss of height of the anterior column and less than 30% reduction of the spinal canal were included.

INTERVENTION

Patients in the compression group were randomized to physical therapy and postural instructions, a brace for 6 weeks, or a Plaster of Paris cast for 6 or 12 weeks. Patients in the burst group received a brace or a Plaster of Paris cast, both for 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Follow-up examinations included radiographs, Visual Analogue Scores for toleration of treatment and persistent pain, and an Oswestry Disability Index at long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 133 patients: 108 in the compression group and 25 in the burst group. For compression fractures, physical therapy and brace were considered the most tolerable. Brace therapy scored significantly better on the Visual Analogue Scores for residual pain and on the Oswestry Disability Index. None of the treatments had any significant effect on the residual deformity measurements. For burst fractures, no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Brace treatment with supplementary physical therapy is the treatment of choice for patients with compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Furthermore, more than 20% of all patients had moderate or severe back pain at long-term follow-up.

[How to read radiography of the traumatic spine?]

In this paper, the imaging features of traumatic injuries of the spine in an emergency department will be reviewed. Three themes are discussed. 1) Review of current indications for additional imaging work-up. Conventional radiographs are not always mandatory, especially at the cervical level since validated criteria are available from the literature. The low sensitivity of conventional radiographs often requires additional imaging by CT (bone lesions) or MRI (disk and ligamentous lesions). The degree of urgency in scheduling these different examinations will be defined by the clinical setting and risk level (low/intermediate/high) of the injury. 2) Review of imaging features associated with stable and unstable lesions. The analysis of conventional radiographs is based on biomechanical concepts. The features of the main lesions will be illustrated by clinical cases and diagrams. 3) Review of key points that must urgently be transmitted to clinicians. The preliminary radiology report is an essential document for the management of patients with traumatic injury to the spine. It will have an impact on the type of immediate management (medical, orthopedic or surgical). A final report validating the initial interpretation should, of course, soon follow.

Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain: a prospective study in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective consecutive series.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze supine and standing radiographs and the association of back pain using subjective pain criteria.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

It has been considered that there is little correlation between the degree of collapse of the vertebral body and the level of pain. In previous studies, however, measurements have only been based on supine radiographs. Although there were 2 authors who reported the results of supine lateral and standing lateral radiographs in patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, as far as we know, there has not been any detailed report concerning the correlation between radiologic findings using supine and standing lateral radiographs and back pain.

METHODS

We examined 100 consecutively treated patients, prospectively. Back pain and the supine and standing radiographs were assessed 1 month after injury. Changes in vertebral wedging rate (WR) from supine to standing position (Delta WR) was reported by the following equation: Delta WR = WR(standing)-WR(supine).

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 75 years (range, 60-89 years). The median VAS of back pain at supine position, at standing position, and when standing erect was 13, 33, and 41, respectively. The median wedging rate on the supine and standing radiographs were 28% and 37%, respectively (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between Delta WR and back pain when standing erect (r = 0.79, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain may give a clue to the pathogenesis of pain from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.

Thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated by "in situ contouring"

This is a retrospective study on a series of 70 patients with thoracolumbar fractures (TL), surgically treated by the in situ bending technique (ISB). Its purpose is to show the performances and limits of the ISB technique for the early correction of post-traumatic spine deformities as well as to estimate the overall outcome in this series and to discuss the indications for anterior grafting. Although the management of limbs fractures is a cleared issue today, spine fractures management is still a matter of debate. Surgical treatment progresses fast, while indications, the fixation techniques, fracture reduction options, and associated grafting are still blurry. Seventy patients with TL fractures, mean age 40.3 years (20-80) were treated by posterior fusion with a standard construct and deformity reduction by means of the ISB technique. Mean follow-up was 30.7 months (12-78). Pre- and post-operative deformity was evaluated and the relative deformity as defined by Farcy's sagittal index (SIF) was analyzed. Thirty-eight patients underwent anterior interbody grafting. The pre-operative SIF decreased from 16.98 to 1.62 degrees (15.36 degrees decrease). Eighty percent of patients were normo- or hyper-corrected. The loss of correction during the follow-up occurred within the disc (SIF: -2.24 degrees , vertebral kyphosis 0.94 degrees , p<0.001), and was lower in patients who underwent secondary anterior grafting (-5.21 degrees vs.-1.18 degrees , p=0.002). Clinical outcome is good (Oswestry=29.75) and seems to be better in cases of double approach (20.71 vs. 37.,4, p=0.001). Sepsis occurred in ten cases, and two patients experienced construct dismounting. One patient had a retroperitoneal hematoma that required embolization. Seventy-one percent of operated patients went back to their previous work after surgery. Spine fractures deserve an efficient treatment. The ISB technique improves post traumatic kyphosis. This results is maintained at long term if the posterior fusion is associated with anterior grafting in cases where the correction within the disc exceeds 50% of the total correction.

Nonoperative management and treatment of spinal injuries

STUDY DESIGN

Review of literature.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate and discuss nonoperative treatment and treatment of spinal injuries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonoperative methods have been a mainstay of care for spinal injuries since ancient Egypt. The vast majority of all spinal injuries should be treated in the nonoperative fashion. The indications and methods continue to evolve.

METHODS

A PubMed search of the literature returned more than 1000 articles related to spine trauma. A total of 270 were references to nonoperative treatment, and 100 were thought to be relevant and included in this review.

RESULTS

All spine injuries are treated in a nonoperative manner, at least initially. The vast majority of injuries are successfully and appropriately treated in a definitive manner with nonsurgical methods. Over the past 10-15 years, the advent of better rigid cervical fixation has decreased the use of halo vests as definitive treatment of many cervical injuries. In contrast, during the same time, more thoracolumbar injuries are being treated in a nonsurgical fashion because the outcomes have been shown to be similar or superior.

CONCLUSIONS

As with all of medicine, the treatment of spine trauma will continue to evolve with time. It is paramount that the physician selects the treatment that will provide the best short-term recovery with the least impact on long-term function.

Radiographic measurement parameters in thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review and consensus statement of the spine trauma study group

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To review the various radiographic parameters currently used to assess traumatic thoracolumbar injuries, emphasizing the validity and technique behind each one, to formulate evidence-based guidelines for a standardized radiographic method of assessment of these fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is guided by various radiographic measurement parameters. Unfortunately, for each group of parameters, there has usually been more than 1 proposed measurement technique, thus creating confusion when gathering data and reporting outcomes. Ultimately, this effect results in clinical decisions being based on nonstandardized, nonvalidated outcome measures.

METHODS

Computerized bibliographic databases were searched up to January 2004 using key words and Medical Subject Headings on thoracolumbar spine trauma, radiographic parameters, and methodologic terms. Using strict inclusion criteria, 2 independent reviewers conducted study selection, data abstraction, and methodologic quality assessment.

RESULTS

There were 18 original articles that ultimately constituted the basis for the review. Of radiographic measurement parameters, 3 major groups were identified, depicting the properties of the injured spinal column: sagittal alignment, vertebral body compression, and spinal canal dimensions, with 14 radiographic parameters reported to assess these properties.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a systematic review of the literature and expert opinion from an experienced group of spine trauma surgeons, it is recommended that the following radiographic parameters should be used routinely to assess thoracolumbar fractures: the Cobb angle, to assess sagittal alignment; vertebral body translation percentage, to express traumatic anterolisthesis; anterior vertebral body compression percentage, to assess vertebral body compression, the sagittal-to-transverse canal diameter ratio, and canal total cross-sectional area (measured or calculated); and the percent canal occlusion, to assess canal dimensions.

Patterns of Collapse in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Functional outcomes of neurologically intact patients with burst fractures may be dependent on final kyphosis at the end of treatment. Conservative treatment is indicated if an acceptable sagittal alignment of the spine can be anticipated. Thoracolumbar burst fractures are often grouped as a single entity where, in fact, anatomically distinct areas of the spine may behave differently owing to different biomechanical factors. The goal of this work was to evaluate differential behavior in terms of final kyphosis in anatomically distinct regions of the spine following stable burst fractures.

METHODS

Prospective analysis of kyphosis in 60 patients treated conservatively for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture was conducted. Initial trauma supine radiographs were measured for initial kyphosis (Ki). Final kyphosis (Kf) in the upright patient was measured at the end of treatment. The Ki and Kf were plotted on a scatter graph; with use of linear regression analysis, a mathematical model was created to define a relationship between Ki and Kf based on anatomic level of the spine.

RESULTS

The thoracolumbar spine behaved in two independent patterns with respect to Kf. Kf at the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L1) had a collapse pattern that could be approximated most accurately with the equation Kf = Ki + 0.5 Ki. At the midlumbar spine, L2-L3 level, a best-fit model for collapse was Kf = Ki + 4 degrees .

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients, fractures that were categorized as "stable" and not requiring surgery were studied for the purpose of determining differential collapse patterns in anatomically distinct areas of the lumbar spine. We have demonstrated that the thoracolumbar junction and the midlumbar spine behave differently biomechanically and recommend that these two anatomic levels be studied independently for research purposes.