Anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: do structural interbody grafts preserve sagittal alignment better than morselized rib autografts?

Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review

PURPOSE

The aim of the current review is to summarize the current evidence on graft materials used in fusion procedures for spinal deformity corrections.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant published observational studies and clinical trials using osteobiologics and biomaterials in spinal deformity surgery.

RESULTS

The use of autograft in deformity correction surgeries has been reported in a limited number of studies, with the harvest sites including iliac crest, ribs, and local bone. Various allografts and biologics have been used in the treatment of spinal deformities including idiopathic and degenerative scoliosis, either as stand alone or in combination with autograft. Limited number of studies reported no differences in fusion rates or outcomes. Use of rh-BMP2 in anterior, posterior or front/back approaches showed higher fusion rates than other graft materials in patients with spinal deformities. Due to the limited number of quality studies included in the review, as well as alternative factors, such as costs, availability, and surgeon expertise/preference, no definitive conclusion or recommendations can be made as to the ideal graft choice in spinal deformity surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most commonly used grafts included autograft, allograft and rh-BMP2, with new biologics and biomaterials constantly emerging in the market. Limited number of high-quality comparative studies and heterogeneity in study design prevented direct comparisons that can lead to meaningful recommendations. Further studies are needed to prove superiority of any single graft material and/or biologic that is also cost-effective and safe.

Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8-Year Follow-up

Objective

To investigate whether anterior selective fusion (ASF) could save more distal fusion segments compared with posterior approach in the treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with long term follow‐up.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study. From 2008 to 2011, 22 AIS girls with Lenke type 5 who underwent ASF or posterior selective fusion (PSF) with more than 8‐year follow‐up, were extracted from the database. 13 girls in the ASF group had an average age of 14.3 ± 1.3 years and Risser sign of 3.3 ± 1.1; 9 PSF girls had an average age of 16.2 ± 3.6 years and Risser sign of 3.8 ± 1.5. The radiographic outcome was compared between groups preoperatively, 6‐month postoperatively, 8‐year postoperatively and at last follow‐up (>8 years).

Results

The average follow‐up duration was 8.7 ± 0.4 (ASF) and 8.8 ± 0.5 (PSF) years, respectively. There was no significant difference at baseline in age, Risser sign and preoperative curve pattern in the coronal and sagittal plane between the groups (P > 0.05). The ASF group had significantly shorter fusion segments (5.1 ± 0.6 vs. 7.0 ± 1.3) and decreased upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (T₁₁ ± 0.8 vs. T₁₀ ± 0.8) than the PSF (P < 0.05); while no significant difference was found in the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and distal reserved segments (P > 0.05), which suggested that ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV. The distal compensatory curve in the ASF group (9.0° ± 3.9°) was significantly larger than in the PSF group (3.3° ± 2.4°, P = 0.003), despite of no significant difference in the incidence of coronal imbalance (P > 0.05), indicating that both two approaches could obtain satisfactory correction in the coronal plane. In the sagittal plane, PSF patients had significantly larger lumbar lordosis (LL, 59.1° ± 10.5°), thoracic kyphosis (TK, 37.2° ± 13.3°) and proximal junctional angle (PJA, 13.3° ± 6.1°) at the last follow‐up than the ASF (LL: 43.4° ± 9.4°; TK: 20.7° ± 8.4°; PJA: 4.7° ± 3.4°; P < 0.05), but without significant difference in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P > 0.05). After controlling for age, Risser sign, and radiographic parameters related to the primary curve pattern, shorter fusion segments and more distal reserved segments still remained significant in the ASF group with greater Risser sign (P < 0.05). No major intra‐ or post‐operative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Both ASF and PSF could obtain satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction for Lenke 5 AIS; compared with PSF, ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV, and save more distal fusion segments only in patients with greater skeletal maturity.

Surgical Treatment of Lenke Type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To systemically review the previous literature regarding surgical treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Lenke classification was published in 2001 as the classification of AIS. Since then, numerous articles have been published reporting the outcomes of surgical treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were queried up to Aug 2018 for articles regarding surgical treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS. Surgical variables, radiographic assessments, and clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS were summarized.

RESULTS

Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. The average fused levels, % correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at final follow-up, and % correction of thoracic curve at final follow-up for anterior and posterior procedures were reported to be 3.6-5.3 and 4.3-7.8 levels, 53-86 and 55-94% and 17-52 and 19-67%, respectively. Average coronal balance was imbalanced (≥20 mm) at preoperation in 22/43 reporting study groups and balanced (<20 mm) at final follow-up in all 37 reporting study groups. Scoliosis Research Society Version 22 scores showed no difference between anterior and posterior procedures in most of the reporting studies (5/6).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the outcomes of surgical treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS are excellent. The thoracic curve was spontaneously corrected after surgery and coronal balance after surgery was better than before surgery. Both anterior and posterior procedures demonstrated satisfactory outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Interbody cage support improves reconstruction of sagittal balance after anterior selective fusion in Lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of interbody cage support on reconstruction of the sagittal profile after anterior selective correction in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 40 AIS patients with a Lenke type 5 curve who underwent anterior selective fusion (ASF) using a single rod were studied. They were divided into two groups: Group A, bone grafting with an interbody titanium mesh cage (TMC); and Group B, bone grafting without a TMC. There were 19 female and 1 male patient aged 12-18 years in Group A, and 17 female and 3 male patients aged 13-20 years in Group B. All patients were followed up for more than 18 months. The coronal correction of the scoliosis and reconstruction of the sagittal profile were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

By final follow-up, more than 70% correction had been achieved for the primary curve and a spontaneous correction for the secondary curve in both groups. Satisfactory reconstructions on the sagittal plane were also observed. Similar changes were found in Group A and Group B, including increases in thoracic kyphosis, slight changes in thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis, no significant losses of lumbar lordosis, mild increases in proximal junctional measurement, and remarkable lordosis losses in the instrumented segments. With lessening of the sagittal balance and L(1) offset, a significant anterior shift of the C(7) plumb line was noted during follow-up in Group A, indicating a more balanced spine in this group.

CONCLUSION

Anterior selective single rod instrumentation and fusion is a recommended method for Lenke type 5C AIS. A structural interbody cage does not appear to improve the regional profile, nor the profiles in the instrumented area and the adjacent proximal and distal segments; yet could result in a better total balance in the long-term.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with open instrumented anterior spinal fusion: five-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter prospective database was queried for patients who underwent open instrumented anterior spinal fusion (OASF) for treatment of primary thoracic (Lenke 1) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

OBJECTIVES

To present the intermediate radiographic and pulmonary function testing (PFT) data from patients who underwent OASF using modern, rigid instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Anterior spinal fusion is an excellent method to correct the 3-dimensional deformity produced by AIS. Modern instrumentation consisting of stronger metals, unthreaded rods, and dual rod systems should theoretically decrease the incidence of rod breakage, pseudarthrosis, and loss of correction seen in earlier OASF studies. The paucity of intermediate and long-term data prevents surgeons and patients from making an informed decision regarding the true incidence of these complications.

METHODS

Of 101 potential patients who underwent OASF with a minimum 5-year follow-up, 85 (85%) were studied. Standing radiographs were analyzed before surgery and at first standing erect, 2-year, and 5-year follow-up. PFT data were collected before surgery and at 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Complete 5-year follow-up was obtained in 85 patients. Five years after surgery, the mean coronal correction was 26 degrees (51%; P < 0.05) and the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve improved 16 degrees (51%). There was a 9-degree (P < 0.001) increase in kyphosis, and there were 9 patients (11%) in whom the C7 plumb line translated >2 cm. There was a 6.7% decrease in predicted FEV1 over the 5-year period, from 75.5% +/- 13% before surgery to 68.8% +/- 2% at 5-year follow-up (P = 0.007); however, there was no significant change in FVC. There were 3 significant adverse events: 1 implant breakage requiring reoperation and 2 cases of progression of the main thoracic curve requiring reoperation.

CONCLUSION

OASF is a reproducible and safe method to treat thoracic AIS. It provides good coronal and sagittal correction of the main thoracic and compensatory thoracolumbar/lumbar curves that is maintained with intermediate term follow-up. In skeletally immature children, this technique can cause an increase in kyphosis beyond normal values, and less correction of kyphosis should be considered during instrumentation. As with any procedure that employs a thoracotomy, pulmonary function is mildly decreased at final follow-up.

Circumferential thoracolumbar corrective fusion with an anterior interbody fresh-frozen femoral head allograft for osteoporotic lower acute kyphosis: a case report

Introduction

Lower acute kyphosis (LAK) is a postural deformity caused by severe osteoporotic vertebral collapse at the thoracolumbar junction. Corrective surgery is indicated for severe cases, but no case report using a fresh-frozen femoral head allograft was found in the English literature.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old Japanese woman with severe LAK with osteoporotic vertebral fractures from T11 to L2 complained of severe back pain and difficulty in walking. The rigid kyphosis measured 74° from T10 to L3. The patient underwent an anterior release and interbody fusion using a fresh-frozen femoral head allograft (T11-L3) and a posterior instrumented fusion (T10-L3). Postoperatively, kyphosis was corrected to 28°, and the patient's symptoms were alleviated. The allograft bone was fully incorporated 1 year postoperatively. A new vertebral fracture at T10 occurred after 2 years, resulting in a slight loss of correction. A kyphosis angle of 35° at 2 years was maintained at 12 years (age, 81 years). She remained free of back pain and able to walk without a cane over the 12-year follow-up.

Conclusion

For treatment of severe osteoporotic LAK, anterior reconstruction is essential to obtain good spinal alignment and prevent recurrence. A fresh-frozen femoral head allograft, in combination with rigid posterior instrumented fixation, fulfills this function.