Weekly Gemcitabine, Paclitaxel, Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Cisplatin-Refractory Germ Cell Tumor

Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin (GEMPOX) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors

Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCT) account for less than 5% of all central nervous system tumors in children in Western countries. Approximately 40% are nongerminomatous GCT (NGGCT). Despite correct treatment, 16% to 47% of the patients will relapse. There are no standard approaches in case of recurrence, and treatment in this situation remains a challenge. We report three patients diagnosed with relapsed intracranial NGGCT treated with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin, in whom the tumor showed a remarkable response with normalization of tumor markers.

IGG* Practice Guidelines on Germ Cell Tumor in Adult Male Patients

Germ cell tumors are rare neoplasms that affect young males. Nearly 99% of patients with localized stage I disease and nearly 80% of patients with metastatic disease can be cured. Even patients who relapse following chemotherapy can achieve a long-term survival in approximately 30–40% of cases. The main objective in early stages and in good prognosis patients has changed in recent years, and it has become of major importance to reduce treatment-related morbidity without compromising the excellent long-term survival rate. In poor prognosis patients, there is a correlation between the experience of the treating institution and the long-term clinical outcome of the patients, particularly when the most sophisticated therapies are needed. So far, of utmost importance is the information from updated practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumors. The Italian Germ cell cancer Group (IGG) has developed the following clinical recommendations, which identify the current standards in diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumors in adult males.

Impact of Non-Pulmonary Visceral Metastases in the Prognosis and Practice of Metastatic Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Non-pulmonary visceral metastases, in bones, brain and liver, represent nearly the 10% of metastatic sites of advanced germ cell tumors and are associated with poor prognosis. This review article summarizes major evidences on the impact of different visceral sites on the prognosis, treatment and clinical outcome of patients with germ cell tumors. The clinic-biological mechanisms by which these metastatic sites are associated with poor clinical outcome remain unclear. The multimodality treatment showed a potential better survival, in particular in patients with relapsed disease. Patients with advanced germ cell tumors with visceral metastases should be referred to centers with high expertise in the clinical management of such disease.

A dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of the biweekly administration of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of the paclitaxel, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin combination administered biweekly in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received escalated doses of paclitaxel (starting dose: 100 mg/m(2)), gemcitabine (starting dose: 800 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (starting dose: 50 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 15 in cycles of every 4 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (median age 65 years) with performance status 0-1 were treated on six dose escalation levels. Eleven patients (40.7%) were chemotherapy naïve, six (22.2%) had received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and ten (37.1%) 2 or more. The DLT level was reached at the doses of paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,150 mg/m(2) and LOHP 70 mg/m(2). The dose-limiting events were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. A median of 3 cycles per patient was administered. One complete and five partial responses were observed in patients with ovarian carcinoma, NSCLC, urothelial cancer, mesothelioma and cancer of unknown primary. No pharmacokinetic drug interactions were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended doses for future phase II studies of this combination are paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 70 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. The regimen is generally well tolerated and merits further evaluation.

A systematic review of platinum and taxane resistance from bench to clinic: An inverse relationship

We undertook a systematic review of the pre-clinical and clinical literature for studies investigating the relationship between platinum and taxane resistance. Medline was searched for (1) cell models of acquired drug resistance reporting platinum and taxane sensitivities and (2) clinical trials of platinum or taxane salvage therapy in ovarian cancer. One hundred and thirty-seven models of acquired drug resistance were identified. 68.1% of cisplatin-resistant cells were sensitive to paclitaxel and 66.7% of paclitaxel-resistant cells were sensitive to cisplatin. A similar inverse pattern was observed for cisplatin vs. docetaxel, carboplatin vs. paclitaxel and carboplatin vs. docetaxel. These associations were independent of cancer type, agents used to develop resistance and reported mechanisms of resistance. Sixty-five eligible clinical trials of paclitaxel-based salvage after platinum therapy were identified. Studies of single agent paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer where patients had previously recieved paclitaxel had a pooled response rate of 35.3%, n=232, compared to 22% in paclitaxel naïve patients n=1918 (p<0.01, Chi-squared). Suggesting that pre-treatment with paclitaxel may improve the response of salvage paclitaxel therapy. The response rate to paclitaxel/platinum combination regimens in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer was 79.5%, n=88 compared to 49.4%, n=85 for paclitaxel combined with other agents (p<0.001, Chi-squared), suggesting a positive interaction between taxanes and platinum. Therefore, the inverse relationship between platinum and taxanes resistance seen in cell models is mirrored in the clinical response to these agents in ovarian cancer. An understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible would be valuable in predicting response to salvage chemotherapy and may identify new therapeutic targets.

Chemotherapeutic treatment of a pregnant patient with ovarian dysgerminoma

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumours during pregnancy is uncommon. This report presents a case of a pregnant woman with ovarian dysgerminoma.

CASE REPORT

At 24 weeks gestation, a 33-year-old patient was diagnosed with unilateral ovarian dysgerminoma. Because the tumour was considered to be at an advanced stage (FIGO III), she received three cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin. At 36 weeks gestation, she underwent a caesarean section, abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingovarectomy, omentectomy, and lymphadenectomy. After surgery, she received three additional cycles of chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting. At birth, the infant was responsive to stimuli, and 20 months after delivery, the infant exhibited normal development.

CONCLUSION

This case report illustrates the difficulties arising from diagnosis of malignancy during pregnancy. Although combined treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin is not considered a first-line therapy for ovarian dysgerminoma, in this case report it elicited an excellent response, and there were no adverse effects on the foetus.

Oxaliplatin for the treatment of cisplatin-resistant cancer: A systematic review

Oxaliplatin is widely regarded as being active in cisplatin-resistant cancer. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to identify, describe and critique the clinical and pre-clinical evidence for the use of oxaliplatin in patients with "cisplatin-resistant" cancer. We identified 25 pre-clinical cell models of platinum resistance and 24 clinical trials reporting oxaliplatin based salvage therapy for cisplatin-resistant cancer. The pre-clinical data suggests that there is cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin in low-level resistance models. In models with high level resistance (>10-fold) there is less cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin, which may be a reason why oxaliplatin is thought to be active in cisplatin-resistant cancer. In clinical trials where oxaliplatin has been used as part of salvage therapy for patients who have failed cisplatin or carboplatin combination chemotherapy, there was a much lower response rate in patients with platinum-refractory or resistant cancers compared to platinum-sensitive cancers. This suggests that there may be cross-resistance between cisplatin and oxaliplatin in the clinic. Oxaliplatin as a single agent had a poor response rate in cisplatin refractory and resistant cancer. Oxaliplatin performed better in combination with other agents for the treatment of platinum-resistant/refractory cancer suggesting that the benefit of oxaliplatin may lie in its more favourable toxicity and ability to be combined with other drugs rather than an underlying activity in cisplatin resistance. Oxaliplatin therefore should not be considered broadly active in cisplatin-resistant cancer.

[Testis germ cell tumours: which chemotherapy, for which patients?]

Germ cell tumours of the testis are curable disease. Two different pathological subtypes are observed: seminoma and non-seminoma. Two tumour stages have been defined: the disease limited to the testis and the advanced disease. In the latter group, the prognosis is established by a specific classification based on the level of serum tumour marker and the location of the metastases. The most active first line chemotherapy is a combination of bleomycine, etoposide and cisplatine. Patients with good prognostic factors receive three cycles of this regimen; patients with poor-risk characteristics receive four cycles of the same regimen. The strategy in non-seminoma patients is to give a first-line chemotherapy adapted to the risk factors, then to complete surgical exeresis of all residual disease. Patients with stage I disease may receive two cycles of the same regimen. The strategy for advanced seminoma is to give first-line good-risk chemotherapy followed by a close observation and in several selected cases a surgical removal of all residual disease. Patients with stage I disease may receive one cycle of carboplatin. Salvage chemotherapy is based on the combination of ifosfamide, cisplatine and either vinblastine or paclitaxel.

Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Cisplatin-Refractory Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor

OBJECTIVE

Cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent a subset of germinal neoplasms with a poor prognosis. Conventional-dose chemotherapy induces objective response in 10-20% of these patients with rare durable complete remissions. We investigated the activity and tolerance of a chemotherapeutic regimen with oxaliplatin and gemcitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1, and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8, every three weeks.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled and were assessable for response and toxicity. Primary site was testis in twelve cases, retroperitoneum in four, and mediastinum in two. Seven patients (39%) were cisplatin-refractory, while eleven (61%) absolutely cisplatin-refractory. A median of three cycles (range, 1-6) per patient were given. One patient achieved a clinical complete remission, one a partial remission with negative marker in whom complete surgical resection of residual masses yielded mature teratoma only, and one a partial remission with positive marker in whom complete surgical resection of residual masses yielded viable tumor cells. These three cases were characterized by testicular primary embryonal carcinoma. They remained disease-free at 44+, 20+, and 18+ months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The oxaliplatin-gemcitabine combination is a safe and active standard-dose regimen for patients with cisplatin-refractory testicular primary GCT.

Testicular germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An overview of many of the preclinical and clinical developments in germ cell tumors over the past year is presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent epidemiologic studies show changes in the ethnic incidence of germ cell tumors; in particular, African-Americans have seen an increase. Additionally, risk factors for the development of germ cell tumors continue to be identified. Work on the molecular pathways involved in the progression to malignancy continues to expand. First line treatment for the disease is highly effective. In an effort to limit unnecessary treatments and treatment-related toxicities, risk-adapted adjuvant therapies are being explored in early stage germ cell tumors. Identification of more effective second-line treatments for advanced relapsing and refractory disease remains a priority.

SUMMARY

Germ cell tumors are highly treatable, but significant challenges remain for recurrent and refractory disease. Recent studies on the molecular pathogenesis of germ cell tumors further highlight the complexity of the disease. As these processes are better understood, the therapeutic options will continue to evolve.

Recent advances in management of patients with platinum-refractory testicular germ cell tumors

With the use of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, metastatic testicular germ cell tumors can be cured in 70-80% of patients, but patients refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy continue to have a very poor prognosis. Various chemotherapeutic agents have been evaluated in intensively pretreated or cisplatin-refractory patients, but as single agents, only orally administered etoposide, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and, most recently, oxaliplatin have been shown to be active with selected patients achieving complete remissions. This has for the first time lead to clinical evaluation of combination chemotherapy regimens such as gemcitabine-paclitaxel or oxaliplatin-gemcitabine, demonstrating the feasibility of combination therapy in these heavily pretreated patients. High response rates of up to 45% were observed in particular with the latter combination. Salvage surgery remains a very important treatment option for patients with resectable disease. The molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance have been intensively studied, and several mechanisms have been discussed such as a decreased intracellular concentration of the drug, increased repair of the drug-induced damage, or an altered apoptotic response to this damage. This increasing knowledge may now allow design of new therapeutic options. Ongoing studies in refractory germ cell tumors are evaluating 3-drug regimens such as gemcitabine-paclitaxel-oxaliplatin but also biologic approaches such as inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor or the vascular endothelial growth factor. This research may eventually allow the development of a noncross-resistant multidrug combination regimen that can be evaluated in an earlier line of therapy.