Management of lymphoceles after renal transplantation: laparoscopic versus open drainage

Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Transperitoneal Balloon Fenestration of Postrenal Transplant Lymphocele: A Case Report of Experience with New Technique

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for improved survival and quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, perirenal fluid collections are common surgical complications after renal transplant, with about 0.6 to 18% of patients developing a lymphocele. Conventional treatments include percutaneous aspiration and drainage, laparoscopic fenestration, and open surgical decompression stepwise. Recently, a new image-guided percutaneous transperitoneal balloon fenestration technique has been described as an alternative to the laparoscopic or surgical technique. We present the case of a 25-year-old male patient diagnosed with a lymphocele after 2 months of transplantation and no resolution of the lymphocele with percutaneous aspiration and drainage. We used this new technique under ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance, which resulted in the resolution of the lymphocele at 1 month postprocedure. This case report highlights this new technique's potential role in successfully managing the posttransplant lymphocele in a minimally invasive manner.

Intraperitoneal Ultrasound-Guided Safe Laparoscopic Fenestration of Lymphocele After Kidney Transplantation

Background: Lymphocele is a common complication after kidney transplantation, which does not require treatment unless it is symptomatic. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical symptoms, treatment choices, and success of different treatment methods of symptomatic lymphocele. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 168 patients who had kidney transplantation between January 2012 and January 2020. Patients with decreased kidney functions due to lymphocele formation during the clinical follow-up were included in the study. External drainage catheter was placed in all patients, except one. In case of treatment failure with external drainage, laparoscopic fenestration guided by intraperitoneal ultrasonography was performed. Clinical symptoms and success rates of treatments were evaluated. Results: Symptomatic lymphocele requiring interventional treatment was detected in 15 (8.9%) of 168 renal transplant patients. All of the symptomatic lymphocele cases had increased serum creatinine levels, whereas 10 had decreased urine volume, 4 had abdominal discomfort, and 2 had ipsilateral lower extremity edema. External drainage catheter was placed as the first-line treatment in 13 patients. In 6 cases, due to treatment failure with external drainage and in 2 patients as a first-choice treatment, laparoscopic fenestration was performed. No lymphocele recurrence was observed during follow-up. Conclusion: Among various methods defined in the treatment of lymphocele, use of laparoscopic fenestration is increasing because of its high success rate and advantages over other methods. Intraperitoneal ultrasound-guided laparoscopic fenestration is a useful and safe method that can be performed as a first-choice treatment since it eliminates the risk of organ injury or bleeding.

Identifying Early Extraperitoneal High-Volume Urine Leak Post Kidney Transplantation

Transplant clinicians need to be watchful of several potential surgical complications in the early post-transplant period, including haemorrhage, extraperitoneal urine leak, and lymphocele. While haemorrhage and extraperitoneal urine leak usually present in the early post kidney transplant period, lymphoceles usually present 2–6 weeks after transplantation. While the colour and volume of the drained fluid can give some indication of the problem, is not enough evidence for a confident urine leak diagnosis. Further investigations, such as serum biochemical parameter analysis of the drained fluid and ultrasonography, help to identify the true cause. This paper discusses how to identify high-volume extraperitoneal urine leaks in the early post kidney transplant period and considers the differential diagnoses. Different ureteroneocystostomy procedures, including the Lich–Grégoir, Politano–Leadbetter, and U-stitch techniques, are discussed and compared regarding complication rates (especially urine leak and haematuria). The authors also address the management of low- and high-volume extraperitoneal urine leak, the follow-up needed, and the impact of urine leak on graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, and rate of hospital readmission.

Consensus on definition and severity grading of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation varies considerably in the literature. This is partly because a universally accepted definition has not been established. This study aimed to propose an acceptable definition and severity grading system for lymphatic complications based on their management strategy.

METHODS

Relevant literature published in MEDLINE and Web of Science was searched systematically. A consensus for definition and a severity grading was then sought between 20 high-volume transplant centres.

RESULTS

Lymphorrhoea/lymphocele was defined in 32 of 87 included studies. Sixty-three articles explained how lymphatic complications were managed, but none graded their severity. The proposed definition of lymphorrhoea was leakage of more than 50 ml fluid (not urine, blood or pus) per day from the drain, or the drain site after removal of the drain, for more than 1 week after kidney transplantation. The proposed definition of lymphocele was a fluid collection of any size near to the transplanted kidney, after urinoma, haematoma and abscess have been excluded. Grade A lymphatic complications have a minor and/or non-invasive impact on the clinical management of the patient; grade B complications require non-surgical intervention; and grade C complications require invasive surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

A clear definition and severity grading for lymphatic complications after kidney transplantation was agreed. The proposed definitions should allow better comparisons between studies.

Predictors of symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation

Purpose

The development of a symptomatic lymphocele (SL) is a frequent postoperative surgical complication after kidney transplantation. It may lead to pain and discomfort and cause transplant malfunction or even secondary graft loss. A large cohort of renal recipients was investigated to identify the possible risk factors for SL.

Methods

All renal transplant patients of a single centre were retrospectively analysed for SL between January 2010 and December 2017. The SL group was compared to a control group from the same cohort.

Results

45 out of 1003 transplanted patients developed an SL (incidence 4.5%), on average 50 days after kidney transplantation. SLs developed more in older patients, in those with a PD catheter and in ADKDP as primary diagnosis. Surgical predictors for SLs were venous anastomosis on the external iliac vein, concomitant PD catheter removal, perfusion defects, shorter operating time, splint > 7 days, double J stenting, discharge with drain, low initial drain production and ureteral obstruction. Opening of the peritoneum, re-operation for postoperative bleeding and previous nephrectomy seem protective for developing SL.

Conclusion

We found multiple heterogeneous predictors for SL with a common denominator related to surgical management of the retroperitoneal space, peritoneum and the ureter. Future prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the influence of these variables on the development of SL.

A Novel Technique in the Treatment of Lymphoceles After Renal Transplantation: C-Arm Cone Beam CT-Guided Percutaneous Embolization of Lymphatic Leakage After Lymphangiography

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous embolization after lymphangiography using C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) performed at the site of lymphatic leakage in patients with postrenal transplant lymphocele.

METHODS

Between July 2014 and August 2017, 13 patients not responding to percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy and conservative treatment for recurrent lymphocele after renal transplant were included. The mean age of the patients was 56.38 ± 9.91 (range, 36-70) years, and it comprised 9 men and 4 women. All patients underwent intranodal lymphangiography. C-arm CBCT-guided percutaneous embolization was performed in patients with confirmed lymphatic leakage. Patients who had no lymphatic leakage underwent drainage with fibrin glue injection.

RESULTS

Lymphatic leakage was observed in 9 patients after lymphangiography, and they underwent CBCT-guided percutaneous N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate embolization. The volume of lymphatic drainage reduced to less than 10 mL in 8 patients. One patient who was not responding to embolization was treated surgically, after percutaneous drainage and fibrin glue injection. Lymphatic leakage was not observed in 4 patients after lymphangiography. Of these, 3 patients showed a reduction in the amount of lymphatic drainage after lymphangiography. All 4 patients underwent percutaneous drainage and fibrin glue injection. One patient did not respond to the treatment and was treated surgically. Prelymphangiography and postlymphangiography and embolization, the volume of lymphatic drainage was 113.07 ± 21.75 mL, and 53.84 ± 30.96 mL, respectively, and statistically significant decrease was detected (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphangiography and CBCT-guided percutaneous embolization procedures might be an effective treatment method for patients with lymphocele refractory to treatment.

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic resection for retroperitoneal lymphatic cysts: initial experience

BACKGROUND

To assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic retroperitoneal resection for retroperitoneal lymphatic cysts.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted based on clinical data from eight patients with hydronephrosis caused by retroperitoneal lymphatic cysts. All patients underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphatic cyst resection and received postoperative follow-up. A follow-up ultrasound was performed postoperatively every 6-12 months to evaluate the recovery of the hydronephrosis.

RESULTS

All operations were successful, and their postoperative pathological results revealed lymphatic cyst walls. The operation time ranged from 43 to 88 min (mean: 62 min), with a blood loss of 20 to 130 mL (mean: 76 mL), and the length of hospital stay was 3 to 6 days (mean: 4.5 days). Within the follow-up of 12 to 36 months (mean: 28.5 months), great relief was detected in all eight cases, and no recurrence was found. Moreover, complications such as renal pedicle or renal pelvis injury were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphatic cyst resection is an effective treatment for retroperitoneal lymphatic cysts and has the advantages of being minimally invasive, producing less intraoperative blood loss and leading to a quick recovery. This treatment thus deserves further studies.

Peri- and Postsurgical Evaluations of Renal Transplant

Renal transplantation is the best treatment of choice for patient with chronic renal insufficiency because it provides better quality of life and longer survival. Survival rates for grafts and patients have improved over the recent decades because of significant evolution of surgical techniques and immunosuppressive treatment. However, renal transplantation is still associated with several complications, which may result in poor outcome. Cause of allograft dysfunction, which occurs in the early or late post-transplantation period, should be recognized immediately, so that it can be managed correctly. Surgical complications are rare and include renal artery stenosis, vascular thrombosis, hematoma, ureteral obstruction, urinary leak, hematoma, lymphocele, and perinephric fluid collections. Parenchymal complications, which are histopathologically categorized according to Banff classification, include antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, calcineurin inhibitors, acute tubular injury, and others. Detection of changes in the allograft function is an important task in the appropriate management of complications. Although first-line imaging tool in the recognition of complications is ultrasonography, radionuclide imaging is a modality capable of assessing graft function qualitatively and quantitatively. Sequential renal scintigraphy is of particular importance in the differential diagnosis of complications, which need prompt and accurate management. Renal scintigraphy within 24-48 hours of transplantation surgery is recommended to serve as a baseline for comparison when functional impairment develops. In addition, studies have shown that early renal scintigraphy has a predictive value for the short-term and long-term graft outcomes. This article focuses in the main complications after renal transplantation, their imaging findings, and the role of renal scintigraphy.

Fibrin Glue Injections: A Minimally Invasive and Cost-Effective Treatment for Post-Renal Transplant Lymphoceles and Lymph Fistulas

Pelvic lymphoceles/lymph fistulas are commonly observed after kidney allotransplantation, especially when the kidney is placed in a retroperitoneal position. While the majority are <5 cm in diameter and resolve without intervention, some may continue to enlarge, and cause local or systemic symptoms or graft dysfunction. Among 1662 recipients of both living and deceased donor kidney transplants between January 2003 and July 2014, we found 46 (2.7%) patients with symptomatic lymphoceles requiring intervention. We studied the clinical outcomes and charges for three treatment modalities including open surgical drainage (22), laparoscopic surgical drainage (11), and percutaneous fibrin glue injections into the drained lymphocele cavity (13). The patient demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable for each treatment group, although maintenance immunosuppressive drugs differed by era. We found fibrin glue injections resulted in significantly lower (p = 0.04) rates of recurrence (1; 7.7%) than either laparoscopic (6; 54%) or open surgical drainage (6; 27.3%). In addition, fibrin glue injections generated significantly (p < 0.001) lower median ($4559) charges compared to either laparoscopic ($26,330) or open surgical drainage ($23,758). Fibrin glue treatment has the advantage of being an outpatient procedure, performed with the patient under local anesthesia, and does not incur the expense of an operative procedure or hospital admission associated with laparoscopic or open surgery.

[Management of urological complications after renal transplantation]

Urological complications after kidney transplantation can cause a major reduction in renal function. Surgical complications like urinary leakage and ureteral obstruction need to be solved by a specialist in the field of endourological procedures and open surgical interventions. The article summarizes this and other common urological problems after kidney transplantation.

A case of continuous negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal infected lymphocele after kidney transplantation

Lymphocele is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Although superinfection is a rare event, it generates a difficult management problem; generally, open surgical drainage is the preferred method of treatment but it may lead to complicated postoperative course and prolonged healing time. Negative pressure wound therapy showed promising outcomes in various surgical disciplines and settings. We present a case of an abdominal infected lymphocele after kidney transplantation managed with open surgery and negative pressure wound therapy.

Laparoscopic treatment of lymphoceles after renal transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Lymphocele formation following renal transplantation is a frequent complication and may affect as many as 49% of patients. Operative treatment of symptomatic post transplant lymphocele (PTL) consists of wide drainage of the fluid collection into the abdominal cavity by excising its wall, connecting the lymphocele cavity to the intraperitoneal space. Laparoscopic fenestration seems to be the best treatment as it combines satisfying success rates with a minimally invasive approach. The aim of the study was to review a single center experience on the laparoscopic treatment of symptomatic PTL and detail relevant aspects of the surgical technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgical treatment for a symptomatic lymphocele following kidney transplantation were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and surgical results were assessed. Detailed surgical technique is provided.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2008, 991 patients received a kidney transplant at our institution. Twenty-five patients (2.52%) developed a symptomatic lymphocele and laparoscopic drainage was performed. The indications for surgical drainage were graft dysfunction (84%), local symptoms (16%) or both (32%). The mean time until surgical therapy was 14.2 ± 6 weeks. Mean hospital stay was 1.5 ± 0.2 days. Postoperative complications occurred in only 2 patients (8%) (one ureteral injury and one incisional hernia) and required reoperation. After a mean followup of 36.2 ± 4 months, only 1 patient had a symptomatic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic fenestration is an effective surgical technique to treat symptomatic lymphocele following kidney transplantation with low recurrence rate and long standing results.

Elderly recipients of hepatitis C positive renal allografts can quickly develop liver disease

Our institution explored using allografts from donors with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) for elderly renal transplantation (RT). Thirteen HCV- elderly recipients were transplanted with HCV+ allografts (eD+/R-) between January 2003 and April 2009. Ninety HCV- elderly recipients of HCV- allografts (eD-/R-), eight HCV+ recipients of HCV+ allografts (D+/R+) and thirteen HCV+ recipients of HCV- allografts (D-/R+) were also transplanted. Median follow-up was 1.5 (range 0.8-5) years. Seven eD+/R- developed a positive HCV viral load and six had elevated liver transaminases with evidence of hepatitis on biopsy. Overall, eD+/R- survival was 46% while the eD-/R- survival was 85% (P = 0.003). Seven eD+/R- died during follow-up. Causes included multi-organ failure and sepsis (n = 4), cancer (n = 1), failure-to-thrive (n = 1) and surgical complications (n = 1). One eD+/R- died from causes directly related to HCV infection. In conclusion, multiple eD+/R- quickly developed HCV-related liver disease and infections were a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality.

Does ultrasonic energy for surgical dissection reduce the incidence of renal transplant lymphocele?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in post-renal transplant lymphocele rate based on the surgical dissection technique for control of lymphatics by examining the historical case group under the direction of a single, university-based surgeon in a retrospective, cohort study.

PATIENTS

Five hundred thirty-two consecutive renal transplant patients from January 1994 to December 2009.

FINDINGS

Of the 532 cases studied, 259 (48.7%) had suture ligation and 273 (51.3%) employed ultrasonic dissection (UD) for control of lymphatics during renal transplantation. There was no difference found in the rate of lymphocele formation, requiring either percutaneous or surgical drainage, when surgical ties (8.9%) were compared to UD (9.2%; P=.999). Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for developing a lymphocele was independent of surgical dissection technique. Within the logistic analysis, the prediction for lymphocele was increased 3.29 times for pediatric patients (P=.002) and increased 2.97 times for those who received a living donor graft (P=.001), and there was a trend for those with a history of more than one renal transplant of 2.01 times (P=.079).

SUMMARY

Surgical dissection technique was not a factor in the development of post-renal transplant lymphocele. Younger age, living donor transplant, and repeat transplant status were found to be predictive variables for symptomatic lymphoceles requiring drainage, which may be considered when patients present for posttransplant evaluations for laboratory alterations.

Impact of surgeon experience on complication rates and functional outcomes of 484 deceased donor renal transplants: a single-centre retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To determine how postoperative and functional outcomes after deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) are related to surgeon experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The outcomes of 484 adult DDRT performed by 13 urological surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. After completion of a staged renal transplant training programme under supervision of an attending urological transplant surgeon, the 13 surgeons were either assigned to the inexperienced group (n = 8) or the experienced group (n = 5). Surgeons in the experienced group had performed more than 30 unsupervised DDRT in a standard fashion with routine ureteric stenting. Between 1988 and 2005, inexperienced surgeons performed 152 DDRT, whereas experienced surgeons performed 332 DDRT.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival at 2 hyears were 98% and 94.7%, respectively. Early graft loss in five recipients was unrelated to surgeon experience. Delayed graft function occurred in 29% of cases and median 1-year serum-creatinine was 1.48 mg/dL, with no difference between surgeon groups. Postoperative bleeding and lymphocele formation were the most frequent surgical complications, with an equal distribution between groups. Ureteric complications had a significantly higher incidence among inexperienced surgeons (6.6% versus 2.7%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that DDRT as performed by inexperienced urological renal transplant surgeons has both acceptable short- and long-term outcomes.

The outcomes of treatment and the etiology of lymphoceles with a focus on hemostasis in kidney recipients: a preliminary report

BACKGROUND

The etiopathogenesis of lymphoceles remains incompletely understood. The aim of our work was to analyze the perturbations of blood coagulation process for their possible impact on the etiology of lymphoceles. Additionally we performed an evaluation of the incidence and effectiveness of treatment methods for lymphoceles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 2004 to 2010, we performed 242 kidney transplantations in 92 female and 150 male patients. The hemostatic parameters included concentrations of: antithrombin, plasminogen, thrombin/antithrombin complexes (TAT), prothrombin products F1+2 (F1+2), d-dimers, and plasmin/antiplasmin complexes.

RESULTS

At 7 years follow-up 27 (11%) recipients had developed symptomatic lymphoceles, namely abdominal discomfort, a palpable mess in the lower abdomen, arterial hypertension, infection of the operative site with fever, lymphorrhoea with surgical wound dehiscence, decreased diurnal urine output with an elevated plasma creatinine, voiding problems of urgency and vesical tenesmus, and/or symptoms of deep vein thrombosis. We applied the following methods of treatment aspiration alone, percutaneous drainage, laparoscopic fenestration or open surgery. In two only patients did perform open surgery. Since 2008 we have not performed an aspiration alone because of high rate of recurrence (almost 100%) and abandoned open surgery in favor of a laparoscopic approach. Our minimally invasive surgery includes percutaneous drainage guided by ultrasound and a laparoscopic procedure with 100% effectiveness. The examined hemostatic parameters revealed decreased concentrations of TAT complexes and F1+2 in subjects with lymphocele showing positive predictive values of 33% and 41% respectively. The negative predictive values for TAT complexes and F1+2 were 14% and 10%, respectively, suggesting decreased blood coagulation activity among effected recipients. Altered blood coagulation processes may explain some aspects of the disturbances of postoperative obliteration of damaged lymphatic vessels and formation of pathological lymph collection afterward.

CONCLUSIONS

Perturbations of blood coagulation may be one cause for a lymphocele.

Management of primary symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Management of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation is highly variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the different approaches of lymphocele management among kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for case studies published between 1954 and 2010. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic lymphoceles developing in recipients of deceased or living donor kidneys with specified intervention and outcome. Primary outcome was the rate of recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, hospital stay, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Fifty-two retrospective case series with 1113 cases of primary lymphocele were selected for review. No randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies were located. Primary treatment modalities included were as follows: aspiration (n=218), sclerotherapy (n=155), drainage (n=219), laparoscopic surgery (n=333), and open surgery (n=188). Of the 218 cases of lymphocele managed with aspiration alone, 141 recurred with a recurrence rate of 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-67). Among those who received laparoscopic and open surgery, the recurrence rates were 8% (95% CI: 6-12) and 16% (95% CI: 10-24), respectively. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 12% (95% CI: 8-16).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic fenestration of a symptomatic lymphocele is associated with the lowest risk of lymphocele recurrence. However, the evidence base to support a recommendation for laparoscopic surgery as first line treatment is weak and highlights the need for a multicenter prospective cohort study to examine the benefits of incorporating initial simple aspiration into the management of lymphocele after kidney transplantation.

Perirenal transplant fluid collections

Various collections can develop in the space surrounding a renal transplant. These collections can present at any point in time from the immediate post transplant period to several months post transplantation and can be incidental or cause significant transplant dysfunction. The use on computed tomography and ultrasound allows for the imaging characteristics of these collections and their relationship to the transplanted kidney to be easily characterized. Standard means of percutaneously accessing the collections to obtain fluid is instrumental in diagnosing their etiology. Urinomas, hematomas, seroma, lymphomas and abscesses can be seen. The management of these collections is dependent on the nature of the peritransplant collection. Optimal care of patients with peritransplant collections is best attained by considered collaboration of a multi-specialty team.

[Incarcerated hernia after laparoscopic drainage of a lymphocele]

Laparoscopic lymphocele drainage is considered the gold standard for the treatment of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation. We report on a female patient who developed a symptomatic posttransplant lymphocele. After laparoscopic lymphocele drainage the patient presented with acute pain in the left lower abdomen. A CT scan showed a hernia into the peritoneal window. This is a rare but potentially severe complication after intraperitoneal lymphocele drainage. CT imaging and swift reoperation with enlargement of the peritoneal window are critical to avoid serious complications. To avoid bowel incarceration, the peritoneal window should be as large as possible.

Minimally invasive methods for the treatment of lymphocele after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

One common complication after kidney transplantation is a lymphocele. The aim of our work was an analysis of incidence of lymphocele and the effectiveness of minimal invasive methods in the management of this complication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The examined group was consisted of 158 patients (68 female and 90 male) with end-stage renal disease who underwent kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (13%) developed symptoms of lymphocele after transplantation procedure within an average time of 34 weeks. The clinical symptoms included a decrease in 24-hour urine collection, an increase in plasma creatinine concentration, abdominal discomfort, lymphorrhea with a surgical wound dehiscence, voiding problems of urgency or vesical tenesmus, febrile states, or symptoms of deep vein thrombosis. The following methods were applied with variable efficacy: aspiration with recurrence 75%; percutaneous drainage with 55%, effectiveness; laparoscopic fenestration with 72% satisfactory outcomes (1 patient presented an excessive bleeding after the procedure), and classic surgery with favorable results.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous drainage guided by ultrasonic imaging should be recommended as the first attempt to cure a lymphocele. Laparoscopy is a feasible, safe technique that should be used after unsuccessful percutaneous drainage. A larger series of patients is required to confirm the superiority of minimal invasive methods to the classical approach.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in the wall of a lymphocele: a case report

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication of renal transplantation with increased incidence after introduction of more powerful immunosuppressive drugs. Presenting symptoms are nonspecific; some patients may be entirely asymptomatic. Herein we have reported a case of PTLD arising in the lymphocele wall presenting with B-symptoms and deterioration of graft function. A 62-year-old-female with end-stage renal disease secondary to Balkan endemic nephropathy and positive Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology before transplantation received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Six months after transplantation she was admitted to the hospital with a 1-week history of malaise, weight loss, anorexia, night sweats, and febrile episodes. Multisliced computed tomography demonstrated a cystic structure at the renal hilus. Graft function deteriorated, so the patient underwent puncture of the lymphocele. Urgent graftectomy was necessary to stop the bleeding. Pathohistology demonstrated EBV-positive, CD20-positive PTLD. The patient received 6 cycles of chemotherapy and continued on hemodialysis. We concluded that a high index of suspicion for PTLD should be maintained when evaluating lymphoceles arising in the later posttransplantation period. Irrespective of their imaging features, biopsy should be performed to exclude PTLD.

Did volume of lymphocele after kidney transplantation determine the choice of treatment modality?

INTRODUCTION

Lymphocele is a lymph collection that forms after surgery following injury to lymph nodes and vessels. The aim of the study was to perform a retrospective analysis of different treatment modalities of lymphocele in patients after kidney transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A lymphocele located in renal graft area was observed in 25 of 386 transplanted patients (6.5%). Mean patient age was 45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 40 to 50) years. Mean observation time was 35 (95% CI, 27 to 43) months.

RESULTS

Mean time from transplantation to diagnosis of lymphocele was 29 days (range, 4 to 127). In 13 patients (54.2%), the lymphocele was symptomatic, requiring initial treatment by repeated needle aspirations or percutaneous drainage. Among 7 patients with persistence of the lesion treatment by sclerotherapy with doxycycline, povidone-iodine, and/or ethanol was successful in 4 cases who showed maximal lymphocele volume of 500 mL. Three other patients, namely, volumes of 120, 874, and 2298 mL were referred for surgery; in two cases, internal marsupialization was performed and in one case external drainage was necessary due to abscess formation. Mean time from the diagnosis to recovery in patients requiring surgical treatment was 15 (range, 8 to 24) weeks. Eleven patients with asymptomatic lymphoceles (mean volume 45 mL; range, 8 to 140) were monitored to resolution after a mean of 4 (range, 1 to 11) weeks.

CONCLUSION

All lymphoceles with the maximal volume exceeding 140 mL were clinically symptomatic. Initial percutaneous drainage with or without sclerotherapy was an effective method of treatment. Punctures, drainage, and sclerotherapy were not effective in patients with lymphoceles (>500 mL).

Lymphocele formation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5. Case report

In this report, the authors present the case of patient with a lymphocele in the retroperitoneal area following anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5. A lymphocele is a rare complication of spinal operations, especially lower lumbar spinal surgeries. The authors discuss this complicating factor and describe its features and treatments.

Does Opening the Peritoneum at the Time of Renal Transplanation Prevent Lymphocele Formation?

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of lymphocele formation following renal transplantation is variable, and the optimal approach to treatment remains undefined. Opening the peritoneum at the time of transplantation is one method of decreasing the incidence of lymphocele formation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether creating a peritoneal window at the time of transplantation decreases the incidence of lymphocele formation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of renal transplants conducted at our institution between 2002 and 2004. Records were reviewed to obtain details regarding opening of the peritoneum at the time of transplant and occurrence of lymphocele. Every patient underwent routine ultrasound imaging in the peri-operative period. Graft dysfunction secondary to the lymphocele was the primary indication for intervention. Data were analyzed by chi-square.

RESULTS

During the initial transplant the peritoneum was opened in 35% of patients. The overall incidence of fluid collections, identified by ultrasound, was 24%. Opening the peritoneum did not decrease the incidence of lymphocele. However, more patients with a closed peritoneum required an intervention for a symptomatic lymphocele. In the 11 patients with an open peritoneum and a fluid collection, only one required an intervention. In patients whose peritoneum was left intact, 24% of fluid collections required intervention. Graft survival was equivalent.

CONCLUSION

Creating a peritoneal window at the time of transplantation did not decrease the overall incidence of postoperative fluid collections. However, forming a peritoneal window at the time of transplantation did decrease the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele.

Laparoscopic Marsupialization of Postrenal Transplantation Lymphoceles

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Clinically significant post-transplantation lymphoceles are not uncommon. Surgical marsupialization with internal peritoneal drainage is the treatment of choice. We describe the successful laparoscopic formation of a peritoneal window for post-transplantation lymphocele drainage as an effective and minimally invasive procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1995 and September 2001, 135 consecutive renal transplantations were performed, and 9 patients developed clinically significant lymphoceles. Four of the nine patients were treated by laparoscopic drainage via a peritoneal window. Analysis of predisposing risk factors commonly associated with lymphoceles was performed. The surgical outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic drainage was successful in all patients. The average operative time was 40 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 1.5 days for patients undergoing laparoscopic drainage versus 5 days for those having open surgical drainage. Accidental division of the right native ureter occurred in one patient, which was identified intraoperatively. None of the patients had developed recurrence of lymphocele after a mean follow-up of 10.7 months (range 6-22) months.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a clinically significant post-transplantation lymphocele of appropriate size and location, laparoscopic drainage is easy, safe, and effective. It decreases hospital stay and hastens convalescence.

Novel Technique to Prevent Lymphocele Recurrence after Laparoscopic Lymphocele Fenestration in Renal Transplant Patients

PURPOSE

To describe the use of nonabsorbable polymer ligating (NPL) clips to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic lymphocele fenestration and to determine the efficacy and safety of this treatment in renal-transplant patients at our center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2000 to October 2005, nine patients with a mean age of 38.5 years (range 26-54 years) and symptomatic lymphoceles were treated laparoscopically among 144 renal-transplant patients. The overall incidence of symptomatic lymphocele was 6.2% (9/144). The mean time from transplantation to diagnosis was 55.5 days (range 20-98 days). Patient and lymphocele characteristics, complications, recurrence rate, and outcomes of this procedure were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic treatment was successful in eight patients; the other was converted to open surgery. One patient sustained an allograft-ureteral injury. The mean operative time was 90.7 minutes (range 75-120 minutes), and the mean postoperative stay was 4.1 days (range 1-7 days). Lymphocele recurrence was found in the first two patients after laparoscopic surgery without NPL clips. With a mean follow-up of 42.3 months (range 31-51 months), no recurrence was observed in patients in whom NPL clips were used to maintain the patency of the peritoneal window. No late laparoscopy-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic lymphocele fenestration with NPL clips is a safe, technically easy, and efficacious procedure for the treatment of symptomatic lymphoceles after renal transplantion.

Long-Term Outcome of Cadaveric Renal Transplant After Treatment of Symptomatic Lymphocele

PURPOSE

Between January 1993 and December 2002 a total of 1,289 renal transplants were performed at our institution. Symptomatic post-transplant lymphocele presenting as increased creatinine and hydronephrosis of the allograft was recorded at 0.02%. Records of the 27 patients in whom symptomatic lymphocele developed and of those who underwent contralateral kidney transplant (control group) were compared to determine the long-term effects of lymphocele formation on allograft function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 37 procedures for the treatment of lymphocele were performed in 24 patients. Open marsupialization (12) and laparoscopic marsupialization (3) procedures were performed as primary treatments. Two patients underwent repeat open marsupialization. Aspiration and percutaneous catheter drainage were performed as a primary procedure in 7 and 1 cases, respectively. Percutaneous nephrostomy was required in 4 cases before definitive treatment.

RESULTS

The mean time to development of a lymphocele was 121 days (range 35 to 631). Symptomatic lymphocele did not require treatment in 3 patients. Of 19 patients undergoing primary marsupialization, recurrence in 2 necessitated repeat surgery. However, aspiration and percutaneous drainage proved to be definitive in only 2 cases. In total 8 patients required more than 1 procedure. At a mean followup of 63 months (SD 30.3) 21 allografts continued to function with a mean serum creatinine of 152 mumol/l (SD 67.9). In the control group 3 patients experienced graft failure and mean serum creatinine was 154 mumol/l (SD 51.9). Five patients died in the lymphocele group, 2 with functioning grafts compared to 4 deaths in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical marsupialization is the preferred primary treatment for symptomatic lymphocele and is associated with excellent long-term allograft outcome.

Diagnostics and Therapy of Lymphoceles After Kidney Transplantation

Lymphocele incidence after kidney transplantation is as high as 18%. We retrospectively studied the therapy of 42 lymphoceles that occurred in our clinic between 1990 and 2005, focusing on possible predisposing factors for their formation and the results of several therapy variants: conservative, operative, percutaneous puncture, and laparoscopic or open marsupialization. There was no connection between lymphocele formation and the following parameters: the extent to which the iliac vessels had been prepared, the materials used for the preparation, or whether clips or ligatures were applied. Lymphoceles may originate either from the lymphatic system of the recipient or the transplanted kidney. The most sensible measures to prevent their occurrence therefore seems to be to restrict the transplant bed to the smallest permissible level with careful ligature of the lymphatic vessels in the area of the kidney hilus. Treatment for lymphoceles should start with minimally invasive measures. We use the following algorithm in our clinic: puncture to differentiate between urinoma/lymphocele and to test for bacterial infection, sclerotization (200 mg doxycyclin), and finally marsupialization if persistent. The choice of operative technique depends on the location. This algorithm resulted in a relapse rate of 9.5% during the postoperative observation period of up to 15 years.

Surgical complications after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplants have become common surgical procedures, with thousands performed yearly around the world. The surgical techniques for the transplant are well established and the procedure is associated with high success rates. The complication rate associated with the procedure is low, especially when compared to other abdominal organ transplants such as liver and pancreas transplants. Nonetheless, the detection, accurate diagnosis, and timely management of surgical complications occurring after kidney transplant are important tasks of the team managing these patients. A delay in the diagnosis or management of these complications can result in significant morbidity to the recipient, with risk of graft loss and mortality. Most surgical complications involve either the wound or one of the three anastomoses (renal artery, renal vein, or ureter). Examples include wound infection, renal artery or vein thrombosis, and urine leak. Most of these complications will require surgical or radiologic intervention for appropriate management.

Urologische Betreuung von Patienten vor und nach Nierentransplantation

Patients with end-stage renal disease awaiting kidney transplantation require regular urological evaluation. The urologist's main task is early diagnosis and treatment of genitourinary malignancies and evaluation of the lower urinary tract. Furthermore, urologists are often confronted with the question of whether or not to perform pretransplant urological surgery, i.e., native nephrectomy for polycystic kidney disease. Urological care after kidney transplantation involves diagnosis and treatment of ureteral complications, malignancies, lower urinary tract symptoms, and last but not least erectile dysfunction, which has a prevalence of 20-50% among kidney transplant recipients. For the evaluation and follow-up of the living kidney donor, international guidelines have been developed in recent years to also help the urologist to perform a correct evaluation and follow-up of the kidney donor.

Assessment of lymphocele incidence following 450 renal transplantations

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of lymphocele in the follow-up of patients who underwent renal transplantation, as well as potential factors responsible or associated to its development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All records from patients who were treated for lymphocele in our institution between May 1989 and December 2002 were reviewed, as well as their clinical outcome following treatment.

RESULTS

Among 450 patients who underwent renal transplantation in the period, only 3 required treatment, with 2 of them treated due to the collection volume, and the other due to symptoms (pain), representing an incidence of only 0.6%.

COMMENTS

The occurrence of perirenal fluid collections following renal transplantation is frequent. In cases where treatment is required, this can generate an excessive morbidity for the patient, which motivates the development of preventive methods, such as minimally invasive therapy, for such cases.

CONCLUSION

Careful ligation of lymphatic vessels both during graft preparation and during its implantation, added to post-operative drainage can significantly contribute to reducing the incidence of lymphocele following renal transplantation.

Post transplant lymphocele: a single centre experience

The occurrence of post renal transplant lymphocele is variable and the best approach to treatment is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to find out the incidence of post transplant lymphocele at our centre, identify demographic or surgical factors that may have influenced lymphocele formation, and distinguish the best approach to treatment. The charts of 138 consecutive renal transplant recipients from 1996 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic characteristics, comorbid illnesses, occurrence of lymphocele and its treatment modality were recorded. A total of 36 (26%) patients developed lymphoceles. There was a significant relationship between an increased body mass index (BMI) and lymphocele occurrence (P > 0.01). The recurrence rate with drainage alone was 33%, which decreased to 25% with sclerotherapy. In comparison, both laparoscopic and open surgical marsupialization had a much lower but similar recurrence rate of 12%. The laparoscopic method had less morbidity, a shortened hospital stay, and less infection than open surgery.

The Influence of Various Maintenance Immunosuppressive Drugs on Lymphocele Formation and Treatment After Kidney Transplantation

PURPOSE

We compared the incidence of lymphocele formation and treatment in kidney transplant recipients given 3 immunosuppressive drug regimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive series of adult kidney only recipients, including group 1-152 who received sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone (P), group 2-168 who received cyclosporine/MMF/P and group 3-193 who received cyclosporine/azathioprine/P, were analyzed for post-transplantation lymphocele formation. All available records and imaging studies were reviewed, such as ultrasound, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging etc, for peritransplant fluid collections greater than 2.5 cm. Demographic characteristics and the risk factors for lymphocele were compared in these 513 recipients using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of lymphocele formation was 174 of 513 cases (33.9%) and the incidence of treated lymphoceles was 81 of 513 (15.7%). In groups 1 to 3 the incidence was 45.5%, 33.9% and 24.7%, respectively. These differences were significantly higher in group 1 vs groups 2 or 3 (p = 0.014) but they were not significantly different between groups 2 and 3. Similarly the incidence of treated lymphoceles was 23%, 12.5% and 12.9%, respectively. Findings were again statistically higher in group 1 vs groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.003) but not statistically significant between groups 2 and 3. A greater number of group 1 patients required surgical interventions compared with those in groups 2 and 3 (13.8% vs 4.7% and 4.8%, respectively, p = 0.019). In addition, acute rejection (p = 0.001) and body mass index greater than 32 (p = 0.02) were significant risk factors on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sirolimus/MMF/P, obesity with a body mass index of greater than 30 kg/m and acute rejection are independent risk factors for lymphocele formation and treatment after kidney transplantation. Patients should be counseled and consideration should be given to prophylactic measures in this higher risk renal transplant population.