Modified cecal flap neoappendix for the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: a novel technique

The appendix conduit with a conflict of interests - An alternate strategy

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally the split appendix has been used to address the need for dual conduits such as the Mitrofanoff and the ACE, however limited by its length. We present a video demonstration of an alternate solution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Size-12 Nelaton catheter introduced via appendicular stump and skirted along the lateral wall of the caecum. Ethicon Endopath 35 mm Linear Stapler was used to create a caecal tube of about 3 cm based on the appendicular stump.

RESULTS

From September 2019-January 2023, 6-patients, aged 5-18 years with a diagnoses of 4-spinal dysraphisms, 1-cloacal anomaly, and 1-urogenital sinus were included.

FOLLOW UP

5-45 months. Two patients had ACE site infection which resolved with antibiotics. One developed a stomal granuloma treated effectively with silver nitrate. All are clean with no stomal leaks and experience easy intubation.

DISCUSSION

Alternatives to the split appendix include the Monti ACE, and Caecostomy tube/caecal flap when limited by appendicular length. The technique described is easy and quick however care must be taken to keep away from the ileo-caecal junction and to keep the tube length as short as possible or needed to preserve vascularity.

CONCLUSIONS

The stapled caecal tube ACE is easy, quick, and safe especially when limited by appendicular length.

Long-Term Outcomes of Antegrade Continence Enemas to Treat Constipation and Fecal Incontinence in Children

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to investigate long-term outcomes of antegrade continence enema (ACE) treatment in children with constipation or fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study including pediatric patients with organic or functional defecation disorders who started ACE treatment. Data were collected at baseline and at follow-up (FU) from 6 weeks until 60 months. We assessed parent and patient-reported gastrointestinal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module (PedsQL-GI), gastrointestinal symptoms, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight children were included (61% male, median age 7.7 years, interquartile range 5.5-12.2). Twenty-two children (58%) were diagnosed with functional constipation (FC), 10 (26%) with an anorectal malformation, and 6 (16%) with Hirschsprung disease. FU questionnaires were completed by 22 children (58%) at 6 months, 16 children (42%) at 12 months, 20 children (53%) at 24 months, and 10 children (26%) at 36 months. PedsQL-GI scores improved overall with a significant increase at 12- and 24-month FU for children with FC and a significant increase in parent reported PedsQL-GI score at 36-month FU for children with organic causes. Minor adverse events, such as granulation tissue, were reported in one-third of children, and 10% of children needed a surgical revision of their ACE. The majority of all parents and children reported that they would "probably" or "definitely" choose ACE again.

CONCLUSION

ACE treatment is perceived positively by patients and parents and can lead to long-term improvement in gastrointestinal HRQoL in children with organic or functional defecation disorders.

The Malone antegrade continence enema adapting a transanal irrigation system in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Patients with severe neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) may undergo the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) surgery to perform antegrade bowel irrigation (ABI). The standard approach may be prevented by a previous appendectomy or complicated by appendicular stenoses and/or stomal leakages. We present the experience by our tertiary referral center for NBD, adopting a modified surgical technique, based on a neoappendix with the terminal ileum to preserve the natural anti-reflux mechanism of the ileocecal valve and avoid stool leakage, and a largely available transanal irrigation (TAI) system to catheterize the neoappendix and perform ABI.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three individuals with NBD successfully underwent our modified MACE program. Case 1 had cauda equina syndrome. He underwent surgery at 40. Case 2 was a man who suffered from spinal cord dysfunction due to acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, functionally T12 AIS B, at 57. Case 3 was a man with traumatic L1 AIS B paraplegia. At 60 he underwent surgery after 29 years since the injury. He needed a surgical revision due to a postoperative subcutaneous infection. After 121, 84 and 14 months from surgery, the three individuals performed ABI every 2 days, presented functional stomas, had no fecal incontinence, and reported an NBD score of 6, compared to 40, 33 and 35 pre-operatively.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report of MACE combining a tapered terminal ileum conduit and an adapted TAI system. Our approach proved to be a safe and effective strategy for severe NBD avoiding a colostomy.

No Appendix is Too Short-Simultaneous Mitrofanoff Catheterizable Vesicostomy and Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) for Children with Spina Bifida

OBJECTIVE

To present the results of simultaneous creation of both Mitrofanoff stoma and Malone antegrade continence stoma (MACE) using simple division of the appendix and a cecal extension method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2011 and November 2016, simultaneous Mitrofanoff and MACE was performed in 16 children (12 children-simple division of the appendix, 4 children-appendicovesicostomy and cecal extension of the appendix). Extension of the appendix was achieved by tubularization of the excised cecal flap next to the short appendicular stump. The new extended channel was then wrapped by cecal wall.

RESULTS

Follow-up was 40 months (10-74 months). Currently, in all children, both stomas are easily catheterizable. Obstruction of MACE occurred in 5 children (4 with split appendix, 1 with extended appendix); Mitrofanoff stomal stenosis occurred in 1 child. Endoscopic revision and prolonged catheterization of stenotic stomas were effective in all cases. Wound infection and dehiscence was noted in 2 children (both with split appendix). Drainage and intravenous antibiotics were effective. All Mitrofanoffs are continent. In 4 children there is incident minor leakage of the MACE (3 with split appendix and in 1 with extended appendix).

CONCLUSION

The split appendix procedure is feasible. Cecal extension of the appendix seems to be a good option when the appendix is too short for a simple split procedure.

Use of Antegrade Continence Enema for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Functional Constipation in Adults: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Antegrade continence enema is a proximal colonic stoma that allows antegrade lavage of the colon for the treatment of fecal incontinence and functional constipation. Its role in the treatment of these conditions in adults has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to evaluate the clinical response and complications of antegrade continence enema in the adult population.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from January 1980 to October 2013 was conducted.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting clinical outcomes of antegrade continence enema in adult patients were considered. Only studies with participants aged 16 years and older were selected.

INTERVENTION(S)

Use of the antegrade continence enema for the treatment of constipation and incontinence in adults was investigated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the number of patients irrigating their stoma. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of stoma stenosis, assessment of functional outcome, and evaluation of quality of life.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies were selected, describing outcomes in 374 patients. All of the reports were observational cross-sectional studies, and 4 were prospective. The number of participants still using their stoma ranged from 47% to 100% over a follow-up period of 6 to 55 months. Eleven studies reported achievement of full continence in 33% to 100% of patients. Four studies described functional outcomes, and 7 studies reported a wide range of patient satisfaction. The rate of stoma stenosis varied from 8% to 50%.

LIMITATIONS

There were considerable heterogeneities within and across studies. Most studies were of poor quality, as reflected in the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies score.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade continence enema has been reported as an acceptable treatment of both functional constipation and fecal incontinence in adults across several analyses. There is wide variation regarding outcome measures. Larger prospective studies are required to assess the role of antegrade continence enema in the adult population.

Outcomes following Malone antegrade continence enema and their surgical revisions

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) channel is an effective means to manage patients with neurogenic bowel; however, complications may occur that may require surgical revision. Specific reports of the outcomes of these interventions are limited. We describe our clinical results following revision of MACE.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing MACE revision for at our institution between 1997 and 2009. Type of MACE (in situ appendicocecostomy (AC = 247), ileocecostomy (IC = 25), cecal flap (CF = 10)) performed was recorded, time from creation to revision, site of revision, and need for repeat surgical revision were recorded.

RESULTS

Of a total of 282 patients that underwent creation of MACE during the study period, 49 patients (17%) required surgical revision. Of these 49 patients, 42 had undergone AC, four had IC and three had CF. Mean time from MACE creation to revision was 19 months. Sixty-eight revision procedures were performed in the 49 patients. Skin level or endoscopic procedures accounted for 52/67 (78%) procedures. Sixteen patients (33%) required more than one revision and three patients (6%) required more than two procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin level revisions accounted for over three-fourths of MACE revisions. In our series, two thirds of patients requiring revision required only a single procedure, but one third required more than one revision.

Advances in pediatric colorectal surgical techniques

The operative management of pediatric colorectal diseases has improved significantly in recent years through the development of innovative approaches for operative exposure and a better understanding of colorectal anatomy. Advances in transanal and minimal access techniques have formed the cornerstone of this innovation, leading to improved functional outcomes, earlier recovery, and superior cosmetic results for a number of colorectal diseases. In this regard, we have witnessed a significant evolution in the way that many of these conditions are managed, particularly in the areas of anorectal malformations and Hirschsprung disease. Furthermore, a more thorough understanding of the pathophysiology underlying encopresis and true fecal continence has led to novel and less invasive approaches to the operative management of these conditions. The goal of this review is to describe the evolution of operative management pertaining to these diseases, with an emphasis on technical aspects and relevant clinical pitfalls.

Long-term results of antegrade colonic enema in adult patients: assessment of functional results

PURPOSE

This retrospective study reviewed long-term results in a large group of adult patients treated with antegrade colonic enema and antegrade colonic enema combined with a colostomy.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified 80 patients (64 females, mean age 51) surgically treated between 1993 and 2007 for fecal incontinence or constipation. Surgical treatments included 69 appendicostomies, 13 tapered ileum, 3 cecal tube, and 25 appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy combined with a colostomy. A 44-item questionnaire was mailed considering bowel regimen, complications, bowel function, social function, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were available for follow-up (mean follow-up, 75 months). Thirty patients (38 percent) had surgical complications. Forty-three patients (62 percent) were still performing antegrade continence enema and 8 patients (12 percent) no longer needed it. Accordingly, treatment was successful in 51 patients (74 percent). Twenty-seven patients (63 percent) had side effects. Evaluation of bowel function, social function, and quality of life all showed significant improvement. Antegrade continence enema was successful in patients with neurologic disabilities (67 percent), anorectal injury (53 percent), idiopathic fecal incontinence (50 percent), and idiopathic fecal constipation (42 percent). Antegrade continence enema was successful in patients with constipation, incontinence, and mixed symptoms. Results did not differ between appendicostomy, neoappendicostomy, and the combined appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy and colostomy.

CONCLUSION

Long-term results were favorable in most patients treated with antegrade continence enema for fecal incontinence or constipation.

THE COLON FLAP/EXTENSION MALONE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMA: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE MONTI-MALONE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMA

PURPOSE

In situations where the appendix is not available for the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure a Yang-Monti channel or a colon flap conduit can be created. We report our experience with colonic flap conduits used for the MACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 169 MACE procedures were performed between February 1997 and March 2003. In 11 patients 12 colon flaps or cecal extensions were used to construct the MACE conduit. Diagnoses included myelomeningocele (8 patients), caudal regression (1), sacral agenesis (1) and gunshot wound (1). Mean age at creation of MACE was 11.3 years (range 4.4 to 16.9). Seven cecal flaps, 1 descending colon flap and 4 cecal extension flaps were created.

RESULTS

Average followup was 22.8 months (range 2.6 to 34.6). Indications for colon flap MACE were appendicovesicostomy (6 patients), short appendix (2), shortened mesentery (1), retrocecal appendix (1), prior appendectomy (1) and right hemicolectomy (1). Initially all patients easily catheterized and flushed the MACE once daily. All 11 patients achieved fecal continence. Complications occurred in 3 cases. One obese patient could not visualize the umbilical stoma and it stenosed, requiring conversion to a spiral Monti-MACE. One patient with a cecal extension had development of a false passage, resulting in complete channel stenosis. One patient had development of stomal leakage, which was successfully treated with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection.

CONCLUSIONS

A colon flap MACE conduit is a simple technique to provide access to the colon for irrigation. When faced with situations were the appendix is not available for the MACE procedure the colon flap can be a good option.

Outcomes of continent catheterizable stomas for urinary and fecal incontinence: comparison among different tissue options

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively review the outcome of appendix, transverse tubularized intestine segments, caecal flap, gastric tube and others tissue options used as a continent stoma for urinary and fecal incontinence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1993 and January 2003 we created 179 continent stomas to treat urinary and fecal incontinence in 135 patients (81 females and 54 males; mean age at surgery 13 years, 118, 87%, aged <17 years). We used either appendix (112), a short segment of bowel following the Yang-Monti technique (49), gastric augment single pedicle tube (eight), caecal flap (seven), Casale continent vesicostomy (two) and Meckel's diverticulum (one). Thirty-six patients had both urinary and fecal continent stomas created.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up for the appendix group was 46 months for the urinary stoma and 23 months for the Malone antegrade continent enema (MACE) stoma. Stoma-related complications occurred in 24 of 112 (21%) patients; there was complete channel fibrosis in five (4%). The mean follow-up for the Yang-Monti group was 38 months for the urinary and 59.2 months for the MACE stoma. There were stoma-related problems in 11 of 49 (22%) patients, with complete channel fibrosis in three (6%). Overall, in the long-term follow-up, there were stoma-related complications in 42 of 179 (23.5%) procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Continent catheterizable stomas are a feasible and reliable method for treating urinary and fecal incontinence. Long-term success can be accomplished with appendix, transverse tubularized intestinal segments and caecal flaps, with similar complication rates in all groups. Surgeon preference and individual patient status should determine the surgical technique to be used.

COLONIC TUBES FOR THE ANTEGRADE CONTINENCE ENEMA: COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

PURPOSE

The Malone antegrade continence enema has revolutionized the management of intractable fecal incontinence and constipation. When the appendix is absent, surgical options are limited. Small series with short-term followup have demonstrated the feasibility but not the reliability of the continent colonic tube. We present our experience with a lateral based colonic tube. We also compared lateral based colonic tubes to medial based tubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients treated with a continent colonic tube for intractable fecal incontinence were reviewed. We identified 8 patients who underwent the procedure between July 2000 and February 2003. The literature was reviewed to compare lateral vs medial based tubes.

RESULTS

Average followup was 28 months (range 10 to 41). Stomal stenosis developed in 4 patients (50%) within 3 to 6 months of surgery. Passive dilation at the clinic corrected the problem in 3 patients and 1 required operative stomal revision. All 8 patients reported almost complete relief of rectal incontinence and constipation. A literature review demonstrated a significantly higher rate of stomal stenosis in lateral vs medial based colonic tubes (40% vs 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The continent colonic tube is a safe and effective alternative in patients with refractory fecal incontinence and constipation who do not have an available appendix. These results appear durable during the described period. We believe that this technique is an alternative to the cecostomy button and it should be offered to suitable patients. The lateral based colonic tube appears to have a higher rate of stomal stenosis than medial based colonic tubes, which may be attributed to the local blood supply of the colon.