Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn's disease: first clinical experience

Assessment of activity and severity of inflammatory bowel disease in cross-sectional imaging techniques: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including intestinal ultrasonography (IUS), computed tomography enterography (CTE), magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), are increasingly used for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We aimed to systematically review literature evidence on the assessment of disease activity, and/or severity through cross-sectional imaging in IBD patients, and to offer guidance on their most effective utilization.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify citations pertaining to the assessment of disease activity and/or severity at cross-sectional imaging techniques compared to a reference standard (ie, other radiological techniques, endoscopy, histopathology, and surgery) in IBD patients published until December 2023.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 papers published between 1990 and 2023 were included, with a total of 10 988 IBD patients (9304 Crohn's disease [84.7%], 1206 ulcerative colitis [11.0%], 38 IBD-U [0.3%], 440 unspecified [4.0%]). Of the 179 studies, 39 investigated IUS, 22/179 CTE, and 101/179 MRE. In the remaining papers, 2 techniques were addressed together. In 81.6% of the papers, endoscopy (with or without histopathology) was used as a reference standard. All studies included evaluated disease activity, while just over half (100/179, 55.8%) also evaluated disease severity of the addressed cross-sectional methodology. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IUS, MRE, and CTE compared to the reference standard were 60%-99%, 60%-100%, and 70%-99%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All cross-sectional imaging techniques demonstrated moderate-to-good accuracy in assessing disease activity and severity of IBD. This finding highlights the potential, especially for MRE and IUS to be widely utilized in managing IBD in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

Imaging of Gastrointestinal Tract Ailments

Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders comprise a diverse range of conditions that can significantly reduce the quality of life and can even be life-threatening in serious cases. The development of accurate and rapid detection approaches is of essential importance for early diagnosis and timely management of GI diseases. This review mainly focuses on the imaging of several representative gastrointestinal ailments, such as inflammatory bowel disease, tumors, appendicitis, Meckel's diverticulum, and others. Various imaging modalities commonly used for the gastrointestinal tract, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and photoacoustic tomography (PAT) and multimodal imaging with mode overlap are summarized. These achievements in single and multimodal imaging provide useful guidance for improved diagnosis, staging, and treatment of the corresponding gastrointestinal diseases. The review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different imaging techniques and summarizes the development of imaging techniques used for diagnosing gastrointestinal ailments.

Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue as markers of local and systemic inflammation: a comparison between celiac and obese patients using MRI

BACKGROUND

Celiac disease (CD) is a systemic inflammatory disease, which primarily affects the gastrointestinal tract. It has been recently demonstrated that adipose-tissue infiltration by proinflammatory immune cells causes a chronic low-grade inflammation in obese patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has already proved to be useful in evaluation of inflammatory states. The aim of the present study was to determine whether alterations of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, identified with MRI, could serve as markers of local and systemic inflammation in patients with CD.

METHODS

A pilot study was conducted comparing alterations in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in CD patients vs obese patients and healthy controls. Fifty patients were enrolled and assigned to one of the following groups: Group A: 11 active CD patients; Group B: 11 CD patients in remission; Group C: 16 obese patients; Group D: 12 healthy controls. A 3-T MRI unit was used and T2-weighted TSE images of VAT and SAT were obtained in specific regions of interest. Serum cytokine concentrations (TNF-α, IL-6, adiponectin, leptin, IL-2, IFN-γ) were determined.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in VAT T2 relaxation time between Group A and B (p < 0.001), A and D (p < 0.01), B and C (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in SAT T2 relaxation time between Group A and B (p < 0.001), A and C (p < 0.05), A and D (p < 0.001), B and C (p < 0.01). In addition, VAT/SAT T2 relaxation time ratio showed a statistically significant difference between Group A and C (p < 0.05) and between Group B and C (p < 0.01). Only TNF-α and IL-6 significantly correlated with both VAT and VAT/SAT ratio in active CD.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI showed similar increased visceral inflammatory signals in patients with active CD and obese patients. However, subcutaneous inflammatory signals were higher in active CD than in all the other groups. These data show that there is a systemic inflammatory state in active CD, whereas chronic inflammation appears confined to VAT in obesity. These data were only partially confirmed by serological cytokine profiles, which showed less specificity than MRI.

Use of magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) in the preoperative assessment of small bowel Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Accurate quantification of the inflammatory activity in Crohn's Disease is essential to determine adequate treatment for each patient. The aim of the present study is to assess the correlation between the pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) and the histologic degree of inflammation from surgically resected intestinal Crohn's Disease lesions.

METHODS

This is a prospective study including a consecutive case series of patients with small bowel Crohn's Disease, who underwent surgical resection. Magnetic resonance enterography was performed in the 3months prior to surgery, applying a pre-established protocol. Relative contrast enhancements, wall thickness, presence of edema or ulcerations were the parameters used to calculate the MaRIA Index. All patients underwent surgery and every specimen was analyzed. The modified Chiorean classification was applied for the histological analysis and an ordinal regression analysis was used to correlate MaRIA and the grade of inflammation for each lesion.

RESULTS

59 lesions from 35 different patients were analyzed. The degree of inflammation of the lesions was statistically correlated to the MaRIA values (P=.002). The MaRIA index was significantly different (P<.001) between the different histological types of the Crohn's Disease lesions (inflammatory/ fibrotic). The best cut-off for detecting severe inflammation using MaRIA was 20 (AUC: 0.741; 74.1% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity).

CONCLUSION

MaRIA is a reliable tool to distinguish inflammatory from fibrotic lesions. Therefore, it could be considered essential for determining the most appropriate Crohn's Disease treatment for each patient.

Endoluminal contrast for abdomen and pelvis magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the abdomen and pelvis can be limited for assessment of different conditions when imaging inadequately distended hollow organs. Endoluminal contrast agents may provide improved anatomic definition and detection of subtle pathology in such scenarios. The available routes of administration for endoluminal contrast agents include oral, endorectal, endovaginal, intravesicular, and through non-physiologic accesses. Appropriate use of endoluminal contrast agents requires a thorough understanding of the clinical indications, available contrast agents, patient preparation, and interaction of the contrast agent with the desired MR imaging protocol. For example, biphasic oral enteric contrast agents are preferred in MR enterography as their signal properties on T1- and T2-weighted imaging allow for evaluation of both intraluminal and bowel wall pathology. In specific situations such as with MR enterography, MR defecography, and accurate local staging of certain pelvic tumors, the use of an endoluminal contrast agent is imperative in providing adequate diagnostic imaging. In other clinical scenarios, the use of an endoluminal contrast agent may serve as an indispensable problem-solving tool.

Grading of Crohn's disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the grading of Crohn's disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched (January 1983-March 2014) for studies evaluating CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy in grading Crohn's disease activity compared to endoscopy, biopsies or intraoperative findings. Two independent reviewers assessed the data. Three-by-three tables (none, mild, frank disease) were constructed for all studies, and estimates of accurate, over- and under-grading were calculated/summarized by fixed or random effects models.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 9356 articles, 19 of which were included. Per-patient data showed accurate grading values for CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy of 86% (95% CI: 75-93%), 84% (95% CI: 67-93%), 44% (95% CI: 28-61%) and 40% (95% CI: 16-70%), respectively. In the per-patient analysis, CT and MRI showed similar accurate grading estimates (P = 0.8). Per-segment data showed accurate grading values for CT and scintigraphy of 87% (95% CI: 77-93%) and 86% (95% CI: 80-91%), respectively. MRI and US showed grading accuracies of 67-82% and 56-75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CT and MRI showed comparable high accurate grading estimates in the per-patient analysis. Results for US and scintigraphy were inconsistent, and limited data were available.

KEY POINTS

• CT and MRI have comparable high accuracy in grading Crohn's disease. • Data on US and scintigraphy is inconsistent and limited. • MRI is preferable over CT as it lacks ionizing radiation exposure.

Monitoring disease activity and progression in Crohn's disease. A Swiss perspective on the IBD ahead 'optimised monitoring' recommendations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The structured IBD Ahead 'Optimised Monitoring' programme was designed to obtain the opinion, insight and advice of gastroenterologists on optimising the monitoring of Crohn's disease activity in four settings: (1) assessment at diagnosis, (2) monitoring in symptomatic patients, (3) monitoring in asymptomatic patients, and (4) the postoperative follow-up. For each of these settings, four monitoring methods were discussed: (a) symptom assessment, (b) endoscopy, (c) laboratory markers, and (d) imaging. Based on literature search and expert opinion compiled during an international consensus meeting, recommendations were given to answer the question 'which diagnostic method, when, and how often'. The International IBD Ahead Expert Panel advised to tailor this guidance to the healthcare system and the special prerequisites of each country. The IBD Ahead Swiss National Steering Committee proposes best-practice recommendations adapted for Switzerland.

METHODS

The IBD Ahead Steering Committee identified key questions and provided the Swiss Expert Panel with a structured literature research. The expert panel agreed on a set of statements. During an international expert meeting the consolidated outcome of the national meetings was merged into final statements agreed by the participating International and National Steering Committee members - the IBD Ahead 'Optimized Monitoring' Consensus.

RESULTS

A systematic assessment of symptoms, endoscopy findings, and laboratory markers with special emphasis on faecal calprotectin is deemed necessary even in symptom-free patients. The choice of recommended imaging methods is adapted to the specific situation in Switzerland and highlights the importance of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging besides endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations stress the importance of monitoring disease activity on a regular basis and by objective parameters, such as faecal calprotectin and endoscopy with detailed documentation of findings. Physicians should not rely on symptoms only and adapt the monitoring schedule and choice of options to individual situations.

Magnetic resonance enterography of Crohn's disease

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has been reported to be a useful modality for the evaluation of luminal inflammation and extraintestinal complications in Crohn's disease (CD). A recent study indicated that the diagnostic ability of MRE was comparable to the diagnostic ability of other devices, such as ileocolonoscopy. MRE can be performed repeatedly because there is no radiation exposure. Therefore, MRE is useful as a method of follow-up for younger patients with established CD. It is useful for evaluating the efficacy of medical treatments, such as biologics. MRE can detect small intestinal lesions even if the endoscope does not pass through the stenosis. The concerns of availability of expertise and the costs associated with MRE should be addressed so MRE can be widely used for CD patients in the near future.

MR imaging of distal ileal and colorectal chronic inflammatory bowel disease--diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 T and 3 T MRI compared to colonoscopy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MR enterography (MRE) for detection of distal ileal and colorectal inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to evaluate whether 3 T MRI can provide a higher diagnostic performance compared to 1.5 T.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with known or suspected IBD who underwent MRE and colonoscopy within 3 months was performed. For analysis, the bowel was divided into six segments. Compared with colonoscopy, the accuracy values for MRI diagnosis of overall and each magnetic field strength were calculated, and the differences between 1.5 T and 3.0 T were compared. The image quality was scored separately for both field strengths and compared.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were included in the study. On a patient basis, MRE had an overall sensitivity of 92.1 % and specificity of 72.0 %. On a segment basis, the sensitivity and specificity were 79.1 % and 93.6 %, respectively. Concerning severely inflamed segments, per-segment sensitivity increased from 79.1 to 94.7 %. The comparison of accuracy values between the two field strengths showed no statistically significant difference. B1 homogeneity and overall artifacts were not significantly different between 3.0 T and 1.5 T imaging. Compared to colonoscopy, MRI found four more fistulas confirmed at subsequent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for detection of distal ileal and colorectal IBD. 3 T MRI can be considered equivalent but not superior compared to 1.5 T imaging in this context. In addition, our findings suggest MRE to be a valuable tool in detecting surgically relevant pathologies (fistulas) with higher accuracy than colonoscopy.

Magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn's disease: a comparison with the findings at surgery

AIM

Magnetic resonance (MR) enterography is a radiation-free small bowel investigation which identifies luminal and extra-luminal pathology in patients with Crohn's disease. Most studies have validated MR against conventional radiology. We evaluated the results of MR enterography by comparison with findings at elective surgery for patients with Crohn's disease, including complex pathology.

METHOD

Between January 2007 and March 2012 the results of preoperative MR enterography for Crohn's disease in consecutive patients in one unit were compared with the detailed findings at surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent 55 laparotomies during the study period. MR enterography identified the presence of Crohn's disease in the distal ileum in 33/34 patients, in the proximal ileum in 7/12 patients, in the jejunum in 7/8 patients, in the large bowel in 10/11 patients and in the duodenum in one of two patients. MR enterography identified ileo-enteric fistula in 10/12 patients, ileosigmoid fistula in all of seven patients and other fistulae in 10/11 patients. An abscess was identified on MR enterography in eight of nine patients. Within abnormal distal ileal segments, the mean contrast enhancement ratio of acute inflammation was 2.39 ± 0.59 compared with 1.82 ± 0.63 (P < 0.05) in segments with fibrosis only.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance enterography identifies small bowel Crohn's disease with an accuracy similar to or better than those of previously published series. Fistulation, abscess formation and large bowel disease can be reliably identified and disease activity assessed. Normal, uninvolved small bowel length can also be measured. Discrete proximal small bowel lesions may not always be detected. In our practice, MR enterography has replaced conventional radiology in the assessment of symptomatic patients with Crohn's disease.

Noninflammatory conditions of the small bowel

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been playing an evolving role in evaluating noninflammatory small-bowel conditions, such as tumors and malabsorption syndrome. MR imaging has shown to be superior to other diagnostic methods in identifying tumors of the small bowel. MR enterography and MR enteroclysis are both valid for studying noninflammatory conditions of the small intestine, although MR enteroclysis may be considered the modality of choice because of its accuracy in the diagnosis of small-bowel neoplasms. Intraluminal and extraluminal MR findings, combined with contrast-agent enhancement and functional information, help to make an accurate diagnosis and consequently to characterize small-bowel diseases.

Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines

The management of patients with IBD requires evaluation with objective tools, both at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease, to determine the location, extension, activity and severity of inflammatory lesions, as well as, the potential existence of complications. Whereas endoscopy is a well-established and uniformly performed diagnostic examination, the implementation of radiologic techniques for assessment of IBD is still heterogeneous; variations in technical aspects and the degrees of experience and preferences exist across countries in Europe. ECCO and ESGAR scientific societies jointly elaborated a consensus to establish standards for imaging in IBD using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and including also other radiologic procedures such as conventional radiology or nuclear medicine examinations for different clinical situations that include general principles, upper GI tract, colon and rectum, perineum, liver and biliary tract, emergency situation, and the postoperative setting. The statements and general recommendations of this consensus are based on the highest level of evidence available, but significant gaps remain in certain areas such as the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between different techniques, the value for therapeutic monitoring, and the prognostic implications of particular findings.

Small Bowel Imaging: Clinical Applications of the Different Imaging Modalities—A Comprehensive Review

In the last years, MR and CT techniques have been optimized for small bowel imaging and are playing an increasing role in the evaluation of small bowel disorders. In comparison to traditional barium fluoroscopic examinations, spatial and temporal resolution is now much more improved partially thanks to modern bowel distending agents. However, there is a global interest in implementing techniques that either reduce or eliminate radiation exposure. This is especially important in patients with chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease who may require multiple studies over a lifetime. Owing to the excellent soft tissue contrast, direct multiplanar imaging capabilities, new ultrafast breath-holding pulse sequences, lack of ionizing radiation, and availability of a variety of oral contrast agents, MR is well suited to play a critical role in the imaging of small bowel disorders.

Imaging indexes of activity and severity for Crohn's disease: current status and future trends

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly used for evaluation of Crohn's disease (CD).

AIM

To review the accuracy of cross-sectional imaging indexes for measurement of disease activity and severity in patients with CD, and to evaluate its applicability on daily clinical practice and research.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified by literature search, and selected based on predefined quality parameters, including a sample size and reference standard. Nineteen publications were chosen.

RESULTS

The US-based indexes of activity showed high correlation with reference standard indexes. There is a good or very good agreement between the MR-based indexes and the reference standard when the comparison is limited to small segments of intestine. Significant discrepancies have been found between indexes that evaluate the colon. Only one CT-based index was included. The main strengths and weaknesses of the indexes, according to its design, are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Standardization of image acquisition protocols and patient preparation should be procured, especially for MRI. In daily practice, a simple, semi-quantitative index providing relevant information on disease activity and severity is preferable. For research purposes, a precise and reproducible index should be mandatory.

Assessment of disease behavior in patients with Crohn's disease by MR enterography

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bowel is an increasingly used modality to evaluate patients with Crohn's disease. The Montreal classification of the disease behavior is considered as an excellent prognostic and therapeutic parameter for these patients. In our study, we correlated the behavior assessment performed by a radiologist based on MRI with the surgeons' clinical assessment based on the assessment during abdominal surgery.

METHODS

We evaluated 76 patients with Crohn's disease, who underwent bowel resection and had an MRI within 4 weeks before surgery. Radiological behavior assessment was performed by 2 radiologists based on MRI. Behavior was classified into B1 (nonstricturing and nonpenetrating), B2, and B3 (penetrating) disease. Surgical assessment was done by the same surgeon, who performed all bowel resections, based on intraoperative findings and histologic results.

RESULTS

The surgical assessment identified 4 patients (5%) as B1, 16 patients (21%) as B2, and 56 patients (74%) as B3. In 97% (n = 74) of all patients, the intraoperative and radiological assessment were identical with interobserver agreement of 0.937. In one case, B2 was radiological considered as B1, and in another case, B3 was diagnosed as B2. The diagnosis of a stricture had the highest sensitivity of 96%, whereas the detection of inflammatory mass showed the lowest sensitivity of 81%. Abscesses had the lowest positive predictive value of 68% with a specificity of 88%. Best correlation was found for fistulae (0.895).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI represents an excellent imaging modality to correctly assess the Montreal classification-based disease behavior in patients scheduled for bowel resection with Crohn's disease.

Is magnetic resonance imaging a reliable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of active Crohn's disease in the small bowel?

GOALS

To evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing the activity of Crohn's disease (CD) in the small bowel.

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional imaging techniques are playing an increasing role in the evaluation of suspected CD. Advantages of MRI include a lack of ionizing radiation, the ability to provide dynamic information regarding bowel distention and motility, improved soft-tissue contrast, and a relatively safe intravenous contrast agent profile.

STUDY

Two reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other electronic databases to identify studies in which MRI imaging was evaluated for assessing the activity of CD in the small bowel from January 2001 to September 2011. Bivariate random-effects meta-analytic methods were used to estimate summary, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

MRI had a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77, 0.93] and a pooled specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96). Overall, likelihood ratio (LR)+ was 9.5 (95% CI: 4.4, 20.6) and LR- was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.26). In patients with high pretest probabilities, MRI enabled confirmation of active CD; in patients with low pretest probabilities, MRI enabled exclusion of active CD. Worst-case-scenario (pretest probability, 50%) posttest probabilities were 90% and 13% for positive and negative MRI results, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A limited number of small studies suggest that MRI has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of active CD in the small bowel; MRI will likely also prove to be suitable as the primary modality for active CD imaging surveillance.

MR imaging of the small bowel

Small-bowel radiology has undergone dramatic changes in the past 2 decades. Despite important recent advances in small-bowel endoscopy, radiologic imaging remains important for patients suspected of having or with established small-bowel disease. Cross-sectional imaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance [MR] imaging), used to investigate both extraluminal abnormalities and intraluminal changes, have gradually replaced barium contrast examinations, which are, however, still used to examine early mucosal disease. MR imaging techniques clearly highlight endoluminal, mural and extramural enteric details and provide vascular and functional information, thereby enhancing the diagnostic value of these techniques in small-bowel diseases. Two MR imaging based techniques are currently utilized: MR enteroclysis and MR enterography. In enteroclysis, enteric contrast material is administered through a nasoenteric tube, whereas in enterography, large volumes of enteric contrast material are administered orally. MR enteroclysis ensures consistently better luminal distention than does MR enterography in both the jejunum and the ileum and more accurately depicts endoluminal abnormalities and early disease, particularly at the level of the jejunal loops. Moreover, MR enteroclysis provides a high level of accuracy in the diagnosis and exclusion of small-bowel inflammatory and neoplastic diseases and can be used for the first radiologic evaluation, while MR enterography may effectively be used to follow up both Crohn disease patients without jejunal disease and in pediatric patients where nasogastric intubation might be a problem. MR enteroclysis may also reveal subtle transition points or an obstruction in the lower small bowel, which may escape detection when more routine methods, including enterography, are used. MR imaging offers detailed morphologic information and functional data of small-bowel diseases and provides reliable evidence of normalcy, thereby allowing the diagnosis of early or subtle structural abnormalities and guiding treatment and decisions in patient care.

Magnetic resonance enterography with and without biphasic contrast agent enema compared to conventional ileocolonoscopy in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bowel is a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We compared magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) with and without water enema to conventional ileocolonoscopy to evaluate the advantage of a water enema for MRI diagnostics of Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 50 patients with known CD. MRE with enema was performed in 23 cases, whereas 27 patients received an MRE without enema. All patients underwent conventional ileocolonoscopy. We assessed the degree of inflammation in both modalities, evaluating up to seven bowel segments in each patient. We compared MRE with and without rectal enema to each other and to conventional ileocolonoscopy.

RESULTS

MRE achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 74%, respectively, for detection of inflammation in the terminal ileum with enema and a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 87%, respectively, without enema. Considering the colon, MRE with enema had a sensitivity of 79% (specificity 96%), while the examination without enema showed a sensitivity of 38% (specificity 99%). MRE with enema proved statistically superior to MRE without enema in detecting inflammation in the terminal ileum, ascending colon, and rectum (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MRE with enema is a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing inflammation in CD patients. Water enema is well tolerated and significantly improves detection of inflammation in the terminal ileum. Water enema should therefore be included in MRE protocols for CD patients.

Radiological imaging of the small bowel

Recently introduced endoscopy-based imaging methods such as double-balloon endoscopy or wireless capsule endoscopy can visualize the complete small bowel. These approaches are quite invasive diagnostic methods. Therefore, radiological small bowel imaging is also still considered as the primary imaging approach to diagnose pathological changes of the small bowel. In this review article the most important small bowel imaging modalities such as conventional fluoroscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound are discussed. Additionally the most important diseases, which can affect the small bowel, are evaluated and the optimal imaging modalities are pointed out, respectively.

Magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease: what the surgeon can take home

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) is a life-long, chronic, relapsing condition requiring often morphological assessment. MR enterography (MRE) offers advantages of not using ionizing radiation and yielding intraluminal and intra-abdominal informations. The aim of our study was to identify how MRE can be useful in planning surgical procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 35 patients who underwent MRE and then surgery for CD were enrolled from 2006 to 2010. MRE findings were compared to intraoperative findings. Histology of operative specimens, systemic inflammatory parameters, and fecal lactoferrin were also evaluated. Cohen's κ agreement test, sensitivity and sensibility, uni-/multivariate logistic regression, and non-parametric statistics were performed.

RESULTS

MRE identified bowel stenosis with a sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.76-0.99) and a specificity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.39-0.92). The concordance of MRE findings with intraoperative findings was high [Cohen's κ = 0.72 (0.16)]. Abscesses were detected at MRE with a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-0.99) and a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.69-0.98) with a Cohen's κ = 0.82 (0.16). The grade of proximal bowel dilatation resulted to be a significant predictor of the possibility of using strictureplasty instead of/associated to bowel resection either at univariate or at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that MRE findings correlate significantly with disease activity. Detailed information about abscess could suggest percutaneous drainage that could ease the following surgery or avoid emergency laparotomy. Proximal bowel dilatation can suggest the possibility to perform bowel sparing surgery such as strictureplasty.

Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are increasingly used for evaluation of Crohn's disease (CD). Aim  To perform an assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging techniques for diagnosis of CD, evaluation of disease extension and activity and diagnosis of complications, and to provide recommendations for their optimal use.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified by literature search and selected based on predefined quality parameters, including a prospective design, sample size and reference standard. A total of 68 publications were chosen.

RESULTS

Ultrasonography is an accurate technique for diagnosis of suspected CD and for evaluation of disease activity (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.92), is widely available and non-invasive, but its accuracy is lower for disease proximal to the terminal ileum. MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected CD and for evaluation of disease extension and activity (sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.90), and is less dependent on the examiner and disease location compared with US. CT has a similar accuracy to MRI for assessment of disease extension and activity. The three techniques have a high accuracy for identification of fistulas, abscesses and stenosis (sensitivities and specificities >0.80), although US has false positive results for abscesses. As a result of the lack of radiation, US or MRI should be preferred over CT, particularly in young patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-sectional imaging techniques have a high accuracy for evaluation of suspected and established CD, reliably measure disease severity and complications; they may offer the possibility to monitor disease progression.

Gastrointestinal tract imaging in children: current techniques

Imaging of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in children continues to evolve, with new techniques, both radiological and non-radiological, being added to the repertoire. This article provides a summary of current imaging techniques of the GI tract (primarily the upper GI tract) and the relationship between those techniques. It covers the upper GI series and other contrast studies, US, CT and MRI. Note is also made of the contribution now made by capsule endoscopy (CE). Abdominal emergency imaging is not covered in this article.

Ileal Crohn's disease: MRI with endoscopic correlation

PURPOSE

To evaluate activity staging of Crohn's disease (CD) measured with MR-enterography using ileoscopy as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was made of 61 patients with CD. All patients underwent MR-enterography and ileoscopy. MRI activity was measured by means of an ad hoc developed score, as well as by analysis of the imaging findings, and was compared with the SES-CD score obtained via ileoscopy. Examinations were performed using a 1.0 T scanner.

RESULTS

MRI score discriminates between active and inactive disease with an area under the ROC curve of 0.941. Overall correlation with the standard reference SES-CD score was moderate to strong (Spearman's r=0.62 p<0.001). Agreement between both methods in staging patients with ileal CD as inactive, mild or moderate to severe was good (Cohen's κ=0.60). Differences in means of the MRI activity scores of the three groups showed statistical significance (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI score is a reliable predictor of activity in ileal CD and can stage patients in a way comparable to endoscopy. 1.0 T scans are valid for performing radiological evaluation of ileal Crohn's disease.

Magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn’s disease: Standard and advanced techniques

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that affects mainly young people. The clinical management is based on the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index and especially on biologic parameters with or without additional endoscopic and imaging procedures, such as barium and computed tomography examinations. Recently, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been a promising diagnostic radiologic technique with lack of ionizing radiation, enabling superior tissue contrast resolution due to new pulse-sequence developments. Therefore, MR enterography has the potential to become the modality of choice for imaging the small bowel in CD patients.

Comparison of conventional abdominal CT with MR-enterography in patients with active Crohn's disease and acute abdominal pain

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with known Crohn's disease (CD) and an acute onset of severe abdominal pain attending an emergency room frequently undergo contrast-enhanced emergency computed tomography (CT) for complication assessment. To assess small bowel changes, an additional dedicated imaging procedure such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is regularly performed. Therefore, these patients undergo two imaging procedures, although the clinical and diagnostic value of such an approach is not known. In a retrospective study, we compared the diagnostic value of a conventional abdominal CT with a dedicated small bowel MRE to assess bowel wall changes as well as typical complications in patients with advanced CD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 53 patients with CD having a conventional abdominal multidetector-CT (MD-CT) and MRE within 2 days. Image quality and bowel inflammation was analyzed for each bowel segment. Lymph nodes, abscesses, and fistulas were evaluated.

RESULTS

For small bowel and colon assessment, there was no significant difference for image quality between CT and MRE. Inflammation diagnosis was not significantly different between CT (69.4%) and MRE (71.4%). Colonic inflammation was diagnosed in 30.2% based on CT and 14.3% based on MRE. The difference for the detection of lymph nodes was significant (CT 49; MRE 27), whereas the differences between fistula (CT 25, MRE 27) or abscesses (CT and MRE 32) detection were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with known advanced CD with acute abdominal pain conventional abdominal MD-CT, which is frequently performed as an emergency imaging procedure, is sufficient for bowel wall assessment. Based on our data, additional dedicated small bowel imaging such as MRE seems not to be necessary.

MR imaging of the small bowel

Cross-sectional imaging techniques are playing an increasing role in the evaluation of suspected small-bowel disorders, and a growing awareness of the risks of ionizing radiation exposure has prompted the exploration of alternative imaging techniques. Advantages of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging include a lack of ionizing radiation, the ability to provide dynamic information regarding bowel distention and motility, improved soft-tissue contrast, and a relatively safe intravenous contrast agent profile. Limitations of MR imaging include cost, imager access, variability in examination quality, and lower spatial and temporal resolution compared with those of computed tomography (CT). MR imaging of the small bowel is indicated for patients with Crohn disease, those for whom exposure to radiation is a concern, those with contraindications to CT, and those with low-grade small-bowel obstruction. MR imaging may be performed with enterography or enteroclysis. In enterography, large volumes of fluid are ingested. Several different contrast agents may be used. These agents are classified according to their signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images. In enteroclysis, enteric contrast material is administered through a nasoenteric tube. Crohn disease is the primary indication for MR imaging of the small bowel because many patients require multiple follow-up examinations. Findings suggestive of active inflammation include bowel wall thickening and hyperenhancement, ulcerations, increased mesenteric vascularity, and perienteric inflammation. Complications are well depicted and may include penetrating disease and small-bowel obstruction.

Magnetic resonance imaging detects intestinal barrier dysfunction in a rat model of acute mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury

OBJECTIVES

To develop an in vivo intestinal permeability assay applying magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor real-time gut barrier defects in animal models of acute mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) insult.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty Wistar rats were divided to 2 groups for I/R challenge or sham controls. I/R rats received occlusion of superior mesenteric artery for 20 minutes and reperfusion for 1 hour. Sham-operation controls received laparotomy without manipulation of artery. To assess gut permeability, a 10-cm jejunal sac was created distal to the ligament of Treitz in both groups of rats after laparotomy, and a contrast agent (gadodiamide) was injected into the lumen of the ligated intestinal sac. The signals produced by gadodamide in the liver, kidney, and plasma before and after the start of reperfusion were examined by 1.5 Tesla MRI (GE Signa Excite), and the increment of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in these organs that parallels the luminal-to-serosal flux rate of the probe was used as an indicator of gut permeability. At the end of procedures, jejunal tissues and mucosal scrapings were collected for histologic examination and Western blotting for epithelial tight junctional proteins. Moreover, liver and spleen homogenates were cultured on fresh blood agar plates to measure the bacterial colony-forming units per gram of tissue.

RESULTS

In I/R rats, disrupted villous structure and decreased epithelial tight junctional expression were seen in the jejunum associated with massive enteric bacterial translocation to the liver and spleen. The SNR in the liver of I/R rats was higher than sham controls (2.65 +/- 0.56 vs. 0.65 +/- 0.26, P < 0.01) at 15 minutes postreperfusion. Elevation of SNR in the kidney was also found in I/R rats compared with sham controls (11.61 +/- 2.07 vs. 3.06 +/- 1.15, P < 0.05). The plasma gadodiamide concentration in I/R rats was significantly increased compared with sham controls (0.220 +/- 0.044 vs. 0.006 +/- 0.004 mM, P < 0.01) at 15 minutes postreperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel MRI-based intestinal permeability assay has shown a significant increase in the signal intensity in liver, kidney, and plasma samples that correlated with mucosal barrier defects in experimental models of acute mesenteric I/R.

Colonic Crohn's disease: value of magnetic resonance colonography for detection and quantification of disease activity

Conventional colonoscopy combined by histological examination, represents the standard for the evaluation of colorectal pathologies and usually is the first examination for the evaluation of patients with suspected or established diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD). However, information provided by colonoscopy is limited to mucosal alterations since the technique is unable to evaluate transmural changes or presence of extraluminal complications such as abscesses or fistula. Technological advances in magnetic resonance (MR) raised expectations on the potential role of this imaging modality for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract based on the high spatial and tissue resolution as well as lack of ionizing radiation. Available evidence indicates that MR colonography (MRC) can be a useful tool as an alternative or complementary to endoscopy for the detection of activity and assessment of severity in colonic CD. In this article, we review the technical aspects of MRC and the spectrum of findings that provide valuable information for the evaluation of colonic CD. Potential applications and limitations of MRC are also discussed.

Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease

Conventional colonoscopy combined with histologic analysis represents the standard of reference for the evaluation of colorectal disease and is usually the initial examination in patients with a suspected or established diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, it is increasingly being recognized that colonoscopy is limited to providing information regarding mucosal alterations. Colonoscopy cannot help estimate the depth of involvement of colonic lesions and does not provide information regarding the presence of extraluminal complications such as abscesses or fistulas. Recent technologic advances in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, with its high spatial and tissue resolution, have raised expectations as to the potential role of this modality in the evaluation of colonic lesions in patients with IBD, as either a complement or an alternative to colonoscopy. MR colonography allows the characterization of colonic changes in acute and chronic IBD and can depict a wide spectrum of related lesions, including ulcers, edema, wall thickening, hyperemia, and fistulas, as well as potential extraluminal complications. The bulk of available evidence indicates that MR colonography can be useful as a problem-solving tool in the evaluation of IBD, as an alternative to colonoscopy whenever tissue sampling is not required, and for the assessment of the entire colon in cases of incomplete colonoscopy.

Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease: a systematic review

To systematically review the evidence on the accuracy of MRI for grading disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD). The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on the accuracy of MRI in grading CD compared to a predefined reference standard. Two independent observers scored all relevant data. Three disease stages were defined: remission, mild and frank disease. The accuracy rates of MRI per disease stage were calculated by means of a random-effects model. Seven studies were included from a search resulting in 253 articles. In total 140 patients (16 patients in remission, 29 with mild disease and 95 with frank disease) were used for data analysis. MRI correctly graded 91% (95% CI: 84-96%) of patients with frank disease, 62% (95% CI: 44-79) of patients with mild disease and 62% (95% CI: 38-84) of patients in remission. MRI more often overstaged than understaged disease activity; MRI overstaged disease activity in 38% of patients in remission, mostly as mild disease. Overstaging of mild disease was observed in 21%, understaging in 17%. MRI correctly grades disease activity in a large proportion of patients with frank disease. For patients in remission or with mild disease, MRI correctly stages disease activity in many patients (62%).

MR imaging of the small bowel in Crohn's disease

MR and CT techniques optimized for small bowel imaging are playing an increasing role in the evaluation of small bowel disorders. Several studies have shown the advantage of these techniques over tradition barium fluoroscopic examinations secondary to improvements in spatial and temporal resolution combined with improved bowel distending agents. The preference of MR vs. CT has been geographical and based on expertise and public policy. With the increasing awareness of radiation exposure, there has been a more global interest in implementing techniques that either reduce or eliminate radiation exposure [Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84]. This is especially important in patients with chronic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease who may require multiple studies over a lifetime or in studies that require sequential imaging time points such as in assessment of gastrointestinal motility [Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU. Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:370-75]. A recent study showed that certain subgroups of patients with Crohn's disease may be exposed to higher doses of radiation; those diagnosed at an early age, those with upper tract inflammation, penetrating disease, requirement of intravenous steroids, infliximab or multiple surgeries [Desmond AN, O'Regan K, Curran C, et al. Crohn's disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut 2008;57:1524-29]. Therefore it has been suggested that techniques that can reduce or eliminate radiation exposure should be considered for imaging [Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84]. Owing to the excellent softtissue contrast, direct multiplanar imaging capabilities, new ultrafast breath-holding pulse sequences, lack of ionizing radiation and availability of a variety of oral contrast agents, MR is well suited to play a critical role in the imaging of small bowel disorders. In this article we will review the technical issues related to the performance of MR enterography and enteroclysis and discuss the role and controversies of using MR in the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Detection of inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic performance of cross-sectional imaging modalities

Different cross-sectional imaging techniques can be used as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this report the diagnostic performances of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the detection of IBD and the evaluation of known IBD are described, together with a short update on patient preparation and imaging technique of the respective modalities discussed.

Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a retrospective single-centre comparative study

OBJECTIVE

There is ongoing debate about which imaging modality is best for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been successfully used to evaluate the jejunum and the ileum. Because virtual colonoscopy by MRI requires bowel cleansing and/or rectal filling, endoscopy is preferred for assessment of the colon. However, hydro-MRI without special bowel preparation may be sufficient as a diagnostic tool if specifically targeted in the course of a known disease. The aim of this study was retrospectively to assess the correlation of endoscopy, histology and MRI findings for the terminal ileum and the colon in a cohort of patients with Crohn's disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In all, 60 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's disease were included in the study. Here, 412 anatomical segments of the colon were analysed by MRI, 401 by endoscopy and 374 by histology.

RESULTS

Presence or absence of inflammation was concordantly diagnosed in 310 segments (77.3%). The highest concordance was found for the terminal ileum and, in patients with previous surgery, the anastomosis. Sensitivity and specificity for MRI versus endoscopy, MRI versus histology and endoscopy versus histology were 64.4%/81.1%, 62.1%/86.2% and 78.2%/80.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of patients with Crohn's disease, hydro-MRI assessment of inflammation in anatomical segments of the colon reaches acceptable concordance rates with endoscopy and histology without prior preparation of the bowel. The data justify a prospective controlled trial.

Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies

PURPOSE

To compare, by performing a meta-analysis, the accuracies of ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on the accuracy of US, MR imaging, scintigraphy, CT, and PET, as compared with a predefined reference standard, in the diagnosis of IBD. Sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated on per-patient and per-bowel-segment bases by using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies, from a search that yielded 1406 articles, were included in the final analysis. Mean sensitivity estimates for the diagnosis of IBD on a per-patient basis were high and not significantly different among the imaging modalities (89.7%, 93.0%, 87.8%, and 84.3% for US, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and CT, respectively). Mean per-patient specificity estimates were 95.6% for US, 92.8% for MR imaging, 84.5% for scintigraphy, and 95.1% for CT; the only significant difference in values was that between scintigraphy and US (P = .009). Mean per-bowel-segment sensitivity estimates were lower: 73.5% for US, 70.4% for MR imaging, 77.3% for scintigraphy, and 67.4% for CT. Mean per-bowel-segment specificity estimates were 92.9% for US, 94.0% for MR imaging, 90.3% for scintigraphy, and 90.2% for CT. CT proved to be significantly less sensitive and specific compared with scintigraphy (P = .006) and MR imaging (P = .037)

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy among the imaging techniques were observed. Because patients with IBD often need frequent reevaluation of disease status, use of a diagnostic modality that does not involve the use of ionizing radiation is preferable.

Developing role of magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is growing concern among the medical community that diagnostic radiation adds to the already increased risk of developing lymphoma that may be inherent in, or related to the treatment of, inflammatory bowel disease. This article describes recent progress in magnetic resonance enterography techniques, and examines the role of MRI in the evaluation of Crohn's disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advancements in magnetic resonance technology and imaging protocol have made MRI of the small bowel feasible. With improved coils, breath-hold sequences and faster acquisition techniques, MRI capably depicts disease location, extent, and complications. Most of the current literature recognizes MRI as an excellent tool in characterizing transmural and extraluminal changes of Crohn's disease.

SUMMARY

The lack of ionizing radiation is the main driving force for MRI of Crohn's disease. This advantage is magnified by the relatively young age of Crohn's disease patients. While intrinsic susceptibility to air and motion may limit its use in some patients, MRI shows promising potential as an alternative to computed tomography in monitoring disease progression or response to therapy.

Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cancer killer worldwide. But the disease is both curable and preventable at an early stage. Regular CRC cancer screening has been shown to reduce the risk of dying from CRC. However, the importance of large-scale screening is only now starting to be appreciated. This article reviews a variety of imaging procedures available for detecting ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), polyps and CRC in their early stage and also presents details on various screening options. Detecting, staging and re-staging of patients with CRC also require multimodality, multistep imaging approaches. Staging and re-staging with conventional colonoscopy (CC), computer tomography colonography (CTC), magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) and positron emission tomography/computer tomography colonography (PET/CTC) are of paramount importance in determining the most appropriate therapeutic method and in predicting the risk of tumor recurrence and overall prognosis. The advantages and limitations of these modalities are also discussed.

Technology Insight: new techniques for imaging the gut in patients with IBD

Advances in techniques for imaging the gut continue to drive the rapid development of modalities for diagnosing and assessing the activity of IBD. Abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance enterography have shown great potential for the diagnosis of IBD and assessment of its distribution, with the benefit of avoiding radiation exposure and serving as a safe option for pregnant patients. CT enterography or CT enteroclysis, with neutral or negative contrast, seems to be a sensitive and specific modality for detecting disease in the small bowel. The role of CT or magnetic resonance colonography in patients with IBD remains uncertain and these modalities are now best reserved for patients who decline or cannot undergo standard endoscopic evaluations. Capsule endoscopy might be the most sensitive modality for the detection of mucosal small bowel disease, but its specificity remains in question. Double-balloon endoscopy is an exciting new tool that has the distinct advantage of enabling biopsy or treatment of lesions detected during the procedure. All these techniques are at the forefront of the rapidly evolving field of imaging the gut in patients with IBD.

MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography (MRC) without bowel cleansing regarding its ability to quantify inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition, patient acceptance was compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC).

METHODS

In all, 29 patients with IBD (17 ulcerative colitis; 12 Crohn's disease) were included. While CC was performed after bowel cleansing as the gold standard, MRC was based on a fecal tagging technique and performed 48-72 hours prior to CC. The presence of inflammation in each of 7 ileocolonic segments was rated for every procedure. Patients evaluated both modalities and dedicated aspects of the examination according to a 10-point-scale (1 = good, 10 = poor acceptance). Furthermore, preferences for future examinations were investigated.

RESULTS

Inflammatory segments were found by means of CC in 23 and by MRC in 14 patients. Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRC in a segment-based detection were 32% and 88%, respectively. Concerning severely inflamed segments, sensitivity increased to 53% for MRC. Overall acceptance of CC was significantly higher compared to MRC (mean value (mv) for MRT = 6.0; CC = 4.1; P = 0.003). For MRC, the placement of the rectal tube (mv = 7.3), and for CC bowel purgation (mv = 6.5), were rated as the most unpleasant. A total of 67% of patients voted for CC as the favorable tool for future examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented data indicate that 'fecal tagging MRC' is not suitable for an adequate quantification of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel. Furthermore, overall acceptance of endoscopic colonoscopy was superior to MRC.

Small Bowel MR Imaging: 1.5T versus 3T

This article provides practical information regarding patient preparation schemes for small bowel MR imaging, and offers dedicated pulse sequence protocols for 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging scanners, with specific emphasis on the advantages and remaining limitations of the higher field strength.

MR colonography

Combining the advantages of unsurpassed soft tissue contrast and lack of ionizing radiation, MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract has become increasingly used clinically. Both bowel inflammation and tumor disease of the large bowel can be well visualized by means of MR colonography (MRC). This article describes current techniques of MRC and gives an overview of its clinical outcome. Special focus is directed toward the evaluation of patients' acceptance of MRC.