Vertical facial distraction in the treatment of arhinia

Congenital Nasal Bones Agenesis: Report of a Rare Malformation

Congenital arhinia and hyporhinia are rare facial anomalies whose knowledge usually comes from case reports. The severity of each case described in literature is variable; it also depends on associated malformations too. Since the newborns are obligate nasal breathers, babies with arhinia or hyporhinia usually have respiratory distress and need airway stabilization. In addition, most of these children present difficulties in feeding and this impairment must be managed early. We describe an unusual case of partial congenital arhinia, the baby did not have other anomalies or any specific complication such as respiratory and feeding issues, so the major problem was the aesthetic and psychological issues for the family. Even if the neonatal course was uncomplicated, a coordinated approach of the pediatrician with the pediatric otolaryngologist, the geneticists and the neurosurgeons was necessary because the management of these malformations is always very complex; due to the lack of reports described in literature, an univocal management and also the best timing and technique for reconstructive surgery are still not defined.

Congenital Arhinia: A Neonatal Case Report

Congenital arhinia or nasal absence is a rare condition, with only less than 100 cases published in the literature to date. It is a rare condition that causes respiratory distress during the neonatal period. Although stabilization of the airway is the priority, management is not clearly defined, given the rarity of the malformation. We report a case of arhinia in a female newborn and briefly review the literature.

Nasal Construction in Congenital Arhinia Due to Novel SMCHD1 Gene Variant

Arhinia, or congenital absence of the nose, is an exceedingly rare anomaly caused by pathogenic variants in the gene SMCHD1 . Arhinia exhibits unique reconstructive challenges, as the midface is deficient in skeletal and soft tissue structures. The authors present 2 related patients with arhinia who harbor a novel SMCHD1 gene variant and illustrate their surgical midface and nasal construction. Targeted sequencing was carried out on DNA samples from the 2 affected patients, 1 anosmic and 1 healthy parent, to identify variants in exons 3 to 13 of SMCHD1 . The affected patients and anosmic parent were found to have a novel SMCHD1 gene variant p.E473V. A staged surgical approach was applied. First, both patients underwent a LeFort II osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis to improve the projection of the midfacial segment, followed by tissue expansion of the forehead, and nasal construction with a forehead flap that was placed over a costochondral framework derived from rib cartilage. The novel gene variant could guide future investigations on genetic pathways and molecular processes that underly the physiological and pathologic development of the nose. Further investigations on the variable expressivity ranging from anosmia to arhinia could improve clinical genetic screens for risk stratification of individuals with anosmia on passing on arhinia to their children. Due to the exceptional rarity and complexity of congenital arhinia, most surgical approaches are developed on a single-case basis. This case series, albeit limited to 2 cases, is the largest pedigree of such cases in the literature. It highlights key principles of a staged approach to nasal construction in arhinia and discusses nuances and improvements learned between both patients. It subsequently offers an optimized guide to this surgical strategy.

Bosma Arhinia Microphthalmia Syndrome (BAMS): First Report from Vietnam

Bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome (BAMS) is a rare condition, with about 100 cases identified worldwide. It is characterized by nasal and ophthalmic abnormalities, as well as disturbances in puberty and sexual development. The cardinal sign is arhinia, though some cases have partial aplasia of the external nose. In addition, several reports have revealed abnormal brain structure, including changes to the olfactory bulbs. This case describes a 29-year-old female who has suffered from BAMS since birth. On presentation, she was noted to have congenital arhinia, bilateral microphthalmia, vision loss, mouth-breathing, an unclear speaking voice, a high arched or cleft palate, and a hypoplastic maxilla. Her paranasal sinuses were ossified and underdeveloped. This syndrome occurs rarely, both within Vietnam and worldwide. It is characterized by four major features: arrhinia, complete absence of the paranasal sinuses, eye defects, and absent sexual maturation. This case report describes the presentation of the disorder to improve otolaryngologists' understanding of BAMS. Criteria for diagnosis consist of arhinia, midface hypoplasia (with a hypoplastic maxilla), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and normal intellectual abilities. Additional important findings are microphthalmia with or without coloboma, anosmia, maxillary hypoplasia, a high-arched palate, and absence of paranasal sinuses and olfactory bulbs.

A Clinical Report of the Complete Nasal Agenesis: Reconstruction of Congenital Arhinia and Review of the Literature

Congenital absence of the nose or arhinia is an exceptionally rare craniofacial malformation, and the pathophysiology of the arhinia is still unknown. Most arhinia patients can have difficulties with breathing and feeding due to the absence of the nose, nasal cavities, and associated problems. A 38-day-old female patient was referred to our clinic with arhinia. Physical examination revealed the complete agenesis of nasal structures as the nasal bones and vestibulum nasi. The region of the absent nose was flat and firm at palpation. Congenital arhinia may occur with other associated malformations such as ocular, ear, palate, and gonadal. Therefore, it is recommended to evaluate computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in the postnatal period. Additionally, a radiological evaluation will help nasal reconstruction by documenting changes in nasal and maxillary anatomy over time. Due to the limited number of arhinia cases presented, the surgical management of this condition has not been standardized. We presented the pyramid-shaped cartilage grafts for the nasal framework and an expanded paramedian forehead flap for the skin coverage for reconstruction of arhinia.

Concurrent arhinia and choanal atresia in a day old male kid

Arhinia is a congenital nasal developmental anomaly that is seldom reported in literature, and especially not reported in domestic animals. This report describes a case of concurrent occurrence of congenital arhinia and choanal atresia in a day-old male kid which had no external nares with the nasal bones fused together with the nasal processes of the premaxillae presententing as a conical shaped rhinal structure with a tapering rostral apex and an occluded nasal vestibule. A bilateral osseous choanal atresia was also seen at the pharynx. Additionally, craniofacial and brain anomalies presented in this condition with right lateral deviation of the face and the absence of olfactory apparatus including olfactory bulbs, tracts and nerves and a vestigial trigonum olfactorium were noted. This, to the best of our knowledge is the first report in the literature indexed in the Medline of concurrent occurrence of congenital arhinia and choanal atresia in a goat.

Reconstruction of Congenital Arhinia With Stereolithographic Modeling: Case Correlate and Literature Review

Complete congenital arhinia is a rare defect of embryogenesis leading to the absence of the external nose and airway. We report our novel multistaged reconstructive approach and literature review. Nasal methyl methacrylate prosthesis was created from a stereolithographic model for use as a temporary prosthesis and tissue expander. Lefort 1 with cannulization was utilized for midface advancement and airway formation. External framework was reconstructed with bilateral conchal bowl cartilage and rib osteocartilagenous grafts. Patient was pleased with the aesthetics and had safe decannulation with the ability to breathe through the nose and airway.

The Case of the Missing Nose: Congenital Arhinia Case Presentation and Management Recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the presentation and management of infants with arhinia or congenital absence of the nose.

METHODS

This case report describes an infant with arhinia that was diagnosed prenatally. In addition to a discussion of the case, a review of the literature was completed to define appropriate postnatal work-up and management.

RESULTS

The patient is a term male infant, diagnosed with arhinia on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at 21-weeks gestational age. Upon birth, the patient was subsequently intubated, followed by tracheostomy due to complete nasal obstruction. Through a genetics evaluation, the patient was found to be heterozygous for the SMCHD1 gene, with hypomethylation at the D4Z4 locus. Plans for reconstruction will be based on future imaging and the development of any nasal patency, however, the patient's family plans to utilize a prosthetic nose until the patient is older.

CONCLUSION

Arhinia is a rare condition causing respiratory distress in the neonatal period. While stabilization of the airway is the first priority, further management is not clearly defined given the rarity of the malformation. This case discusses stabilization of the airway with a review of treatment and reconstructive options.

The Epigenetic Regulator SMCHD1 in Development and Disease

It has very recently become clear that the epigenetic modifier SMCHD1 has a role in two distinct disorders: facioscapulohumoral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) and Bosma arhinia and micropthalmia (BAMS). In the former there are heterozygous loss-of-function mutations, while both gain- and loss-of-function mutations have been proposed to underlie the latter. These findings have led to much interest in SMCHD1 and how it works at the molecular level. We summarise here current understanding of the mechanism of action of SMCHD1, its role in these diseases, and what has been learnt from study of mouse models null for Smchd1 in the decade since the discovery of SMCHD1.

Use of distraction osteogenesis in arrhinia

Nasal malformations such as hemiarrhinia and arrhinia have a very low incidence, although many treatment protocols have been described. In this article, we describe 2 surgical techniques to treat arrhinia depending on the age at the beginning of treatment. In our practice, we use Le Fort III osteotomy with distraction osteogenesis as a pillar of the reconstruction because it allows to improve anteroposterior and vertical projections of the midface, giving a proper platform for nasal reconstruction, decreasing the number of interventions. We report a patient with a hemiarrhinia who has completed appropriate reconstruction results and a patient with total arrhinia in whom the distraction was achieved to create a nasal bone support and improve midface projection.

Congenital arhinia: A rare case

Patient: Male, 4 months

Final Diagnosis: Congenital arhynia

Symptoms: Absence of the nose

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Pediatrics and Noenatology • Genetics

The role of maxillary osteotomy in the treatment of arhinia

PURPOSE

Arhinia is a very rare malformation, and only 41 cases are described in the literature. Given its rarity, there is no standardized surgical protocol. This article describes our preferred treatment, which underlines the importance of maxillary osteotomy for obtaining satisfactory results.

METHODS

We observed 3 girls with arhinia, 2 of whom were treated by a 2-step surgical protocol. During the first phase, the patients underwent maxillary osteotomy with the creation of a new epithelium-lined nasal cavity. A skin expander was also placed in the forehead. During the second step, an external nose was created in both patients from the expanded forehead flap with local perinasal flaps and costochondral grafts.

RESULTS

Both reconstructions were viable and esthetically acceptable. No internal nose restenosis was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our experience, maxillary osteotomy should be considered part of an integrated approach in treating arhinia.

Congenital arhinia: A rare case

Congenital arhinia or absence of nose is a rare condition with only 30 cases reported so far. We report a rare case and briefly review the literature.

Management of a case of arhinia

Arhinia is a rare condition characterised by the congenital absence of nasal structures, with different patterns of presentation, and often associated with other craniofacial or somatic anomalies. To date, about 30 surviving cases have been reported. We report the case of a female patient aged 6 years, who underwent internal and external nose reconstruction using a staged procedure: a nasal airway was obtained through maxillary osteotomy and ostectomy, and lined with a local skin flap and split-thickness skin grafts; then the external nose was reconstructed with an expanded frontal flap, armed with an autogenous rib framework.

Congenital arhinia: molecular-genetic analysis of five patients

Congenital arhinia, complete absence of the nose, is an extremely rare anomaly with unknown cause. To our knowledge, a total of 36 cases have been reported, but there has been no molecular-genetic study on this anomaly. We encountered a sporadic case of congenital arhinia associated with a de novo chromosomal translocation, t(3;12)(q13.2;p11.2). This led us to analyze the patient by BAC-based FISH for translocation breakpoints and whole-genome array CGH for other possible deletions/duplications in the genome. We found in this patient an approximately 19 Mb deletion spanning from 3q11.2 to 3q13.31 but no disruption of any gene(s) at the other breakpoint, 12p11.2. As the deleted segment at 3q was a strong candidate region containing the putative arhinia gene, we also performed the array CGH in four other arhinia patients with normal karyotypes, as well as mutation analysis of two genes, COL8A1 and CPOX, selected among hundreds of genes located to the deleted region, because they are expressed during early stages of human craniofacial development. However, in the four patients, there were no copy number aberrations in the region examined or no mutations in the two genes. Although our study failed to identify the putative arhinia gene, the data may become a clue to unravel the underlying mechanism of arhinia.

[The rare malformation of nasal aplasia]

BACKGROUND

After presenting two sisters with the rare form of congenital arrhinia, this syndrome is reviewed, an explanation of the pathogenesis is offered and the therapeutic options of the functional and aesthetic reconstruction are discussed.

DISCUSSION

In cases of congenital arrhinia different degrees of respiratory distress, cyanotic episodes, and impaired food intake are described. Therefore after birth respiration and food intake need to be monitored to alleviate the situation through intubation or tracheotomy. The following conclusions could be made based on the literature overview. Little is known about the pathophysiology and a great variety of therapeutic interventions and reconstruction solutions with a wide spectrum of complications are described. Due to the numerous forms of complications, which need to be compared with the reconstructive results, indications for surgical reconstruction of the airway and plastic reconstruction of the nose during childhood must be defined very stringently.

CONCLUSION

One method to achieve a satisfactory plastic result is with an osseointegrated prosthesis. This facial prosthesis can be inserted without complications and can guarantee an adequate result, whereas no impairment of maxillofacial development was noted.