Biliary reconstruction in right lobe living-donor liver transplantation: Comparison of different techniques in 321 recipients

Post-living donor liver transplant biliary strictures: prevalence, predictors, and long-term outcomes in a retrospective study

Background

Post-liver transplant biliary strictures are a common cause of morbidity among patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Limited data are available concerning the response rates to various treatment modalities and the long-term outcomes for these individuals.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LDLT between 2006 and 2022.

Results

Between 2006 and 2022, a total of 3,550 patients underwent liver transplantation. After applying exclusion criteria, 2,956 patients were included in the analysis. During the study period, 344 patients (11.6%) developed biliary strictures. Of these, 77.0% underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the primary treatment for biliary strictures, while the remainder received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Identified risk factors for post-liver transplant biliary strictures included the presence of multiple biliary anastomoses, bile leak, and older donor and recipient ages. The overall graft and patient survival rates were comparable between patients with and without biliary strictures, at both 1 year (93.0% vs. 96.3%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 79.2%).

Conclusions

Biliary strictures are observed in approximately 11% of recipients following LDLT. While the presence of biliary strictures is associated with increased morbidity, it does not significantly impact patient survival.

Ultrasound innovations in abdominal radiology: multiparametic imaging in liver transplantation

PURPOSE

Ultrasound plays a central role in liver transplant evaluation. Acute, subacute, and chronic complications can be readily identified using grayscale and color Doppler ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound adds a new dimension to liver transplant evaluation, depicting vascular and parenchymal processes with exquisite detail. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that contrast-enhanced ultrasound may allow for localization of biliary leak in select patients. We aimed to assess the use of multiparametric ultrasound-including grayscale, color and spectral Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-in the setting of liver transplantation.

METHODS

A literature review was performed using the MEDLINE bibliographic database through the National Library of Medicine. The following terms were searched and relevant citations assessed: "abdominal ultrasound," "contrast-enhanced ultrasound," "liver transplant," and "ultrasound."

RESULTS

Grayscale and color Doppler ultrasound represent the mainstay imaging modalities for postoperative liver transplant evaluation. The addition of contrast enhancement plays a complementary role and can provide valuable information related to the allograft vasculature, parenchyma, and biliary tree. The appropriate implementation of grayscale, color Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound can optimize sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of liver transplantation complications, including hepatic artery stenosis, biliary leakage, and infection.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal sonographic evaluation is essential to identify postoperative complications in liver transplant recipients. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be of value in challenging cases, providing excellent anatomic delineation and reducing the risk of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses. A broad familiarity with appropriate applications of both nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced ultrasound may help radiologists optimize allograft assessment and improve patient outcomes.

Development and Clinical Validation of Model-Informed Precision Dosing for Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients

Everolimus presents significant dosing challenges due to between- and within-patient pharmacokinetic variabilities. This study aimed to develop and validate a model-informed precision dosing strategy for everolimus in liver transplant recipients. The dosing strategy was initially developed using retrospective data, employing nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The model included readily measurable covariates, body surface area, albumin, and tacrolimus trough concentration. The dosing strategy was subsequently validated in a prospective trial, recommending 1 to 1.75 mg dosages every 12 h, depending on covariates. Lower dosages were recommended for patients with lower body surface area and albumin with adjustments based on tacrolimus trough concentration. The estimated pharmacokinetic parameters (typical value ± standard error), apparent clearance (CL/F: 15.0 ± 0.5 L/h), and apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F: 862 ± 79.3 L) were refined using prospective clinical data from 20 patients, reducing interindividual variations. This research successfully developed and validated a population pharmacokinetic model for everolimus. The developed "dosE" web-based platform translates our pharmacokinetic model into a practical tool for healthcare providers, exemplifying the application of pharmaceutical research in clinical practice and potentially improving therapeutic outcomes in liver transplantation.

Risk factors for biliary strictures and leaks after living-donor liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment of end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients on the organ waitlist die waiting for an organ. Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an approach that has been used to expand organ availability. Although LDLT has excellent outcomes, biliary complications remain a significant drawback. This meta-analysis aimed to precisely assess the predictors of biliary stricture and leak after LDLT.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Only studies that used a multivariate model to assess risk factors for post-LDLT biliary stricture or leak in adult participants were included. Studies reporting unadjusted risk factors were excluded. Pooled adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for risk factors reported in ≥2 studies were obtained within a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 studies with 9442 patients who underwent LDLT were included. The post-LDLT biliary stricture rate was 22%, whereas the post-LDLT biliary leak rate was 14%. In addition, 13 unique risk factors were analyzed. Postoperative bile leak (OR, 4.10 [95% CI, 2.88-5.83]; HR, 3.88 [95% CI, 2.15-6.99]) was the most significant predictor of biliary stricture after LDLT. Other significant predictors of biliary stricture after LDLT were right lobe graft (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.23-5.32), multiple ducts for anastomosis (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.08-2.43), ductoplasty (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.36-3.13), ABO incompatibility (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16-1.81), and acute cellular rejection (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.88-5.83). Donor bile duct size (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91; P = .001, I2 = 0%) was found to be significantly associated with reduced risk of post-LDLT biliary stricture. Donor age, recipient age, recipient male sex, and duct-to-duct anastomosis were not associated with an increased risk of post-LDLT biliary strictures. Multiple ducts for anastomosis (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.43-2.43) was a significant predictor of post-LDLT biliary leak. Recipient age, warm ischemia time, and duct-to-duct anastomosis were not associated with an increased risk of post-LDLT biliary leak.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, 7 unique risk factors were shown to be predictive of post-LDLT biliary stricture, one of which was associated with both post-LDLT biliary stricture and leak. Donor bile duct size was found to be protective against post-LDLT biliary strictures. Identifying reliable predictors is crucial for recognizing high-risk patients. This approach can facilitate the implementation of preventive measures, surveillance protocols, and targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of biliary strictures after LDLT.

Continuous or Interrupted Suture for Hepaticojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy (The HEKTIK Trial): Findings of a Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Superiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Over 6000 pancreaticoduodenectomies are per - formed each year in Germany, and hepaticojejunostomy is a crucial step of the procedure. An anastomotic leak of hepaticojejunostomy can cause major postoperative complications. The aim of this trial was to compare the morbidity and efficiency of continuous versus interrupted suturing for hepaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduo - denectomy.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, single-center trial (German Clinical Trials Register No. DRKS00024395), patients scheduled for elective open partial pancreaticoduodenectomy with hepaticoje - junostomy between January 2020 and May 2023 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to suturing of the hepaticojejunostomy with either a continuous or an interrupted technique. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leakage from the hepaticojejunostomy in the first three days after surgery. Further perioperative parameters were secondary endpoints, including later leakage, other complications, the duration of hepaticojejunostomy, and the cost of hepaticojejunostomy.

RESULTS

The 100 patients in the trial consisted of 50 in each group. The rate of early anastomotic leakage was 2% in both groups (95% confidence interval for the difference, [-5.5%; 5.5%]; p = 1.000). As for the secondary endpoints, there were no relevant intergroup differences in any other short-term or long-term morbidity parameters. Continuous suturing of the hepaticojejunostomy was, however, 31% faster and 68% cheaper in material costs.

CONCLUSION

These data imply that continuous and interrupted suturing techniques yield equally good clinical outcomes in hepaticojejunostomies of hepatic ducts with diameter 5 mm or more. Continuous suturing is, however, both faster and cheaper.

Biliary complications after adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation: An international multicenter study of 3633 cases

In living-donor liver transplantation, biliary complications including bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures remain significant challenges, with incidences varying across different centers. This multicentric retrospective study (2016-2020) included 3633 adult patients from 18 centers and aimed to identify risk factors for these biliary complications and their impact on patient survival. Incidences of bile leaks and biliary strictures were 11.4% and 20.6%, respectively. Key risk factors for bile leaks included multiple bile duct anastomoses (odds ratio, [OR] 1.8), Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (OR, 1.4), and a history of major abdominal surgery (OR, 1.4). For biliary anastomotic strictures, risk factors were ABO incompatibility (OR, 1.4), blood loss >1 L (OR, 1.4), and previous abdominal surgery (OR, 1.7). Patients experiencing biliary complications had extended hospital stays, increased incidence of major complications, and higher comprehensive complication index scores. The impact on graft survival became evident after accounting for immortal time bias using time-dependent covariate survival analysis. Bile leaks and biliary anastomotic strictures were associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.7 and 1.8 for graft survival, respectively. The study underscores the importance of minimizing these risks through careful donor selection and preoperative planning, as biliary complications significantly affect graft survival, despite the availability of effective treatments.

The outcomes and biliary complications of a staged biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled massive bleeding and bowel edema are critical issues during liver transplantation. Temporal intra-abdominal packing with staged biliary reconstruction (SBR) yields acceptable outcomes in deceased donor liver transplantation; however, data on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are scarce.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1269 patients who underwent LDLT was performed. After one-to-two propensity score matching, patients who underwent LDLT with SBR were compared with those who underwent LDLT with one-stage biliary reconstruction (OSBR). The primary outcomes were graft survival (GS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were postoperative biliary complications.

RESULTS

There were 55 and 110 patients in the SBR and OSBR groups, respectively. The median blood loss was 6500 mL in the SBR and 4875 mL in the OSBR group. Patients receiving SBR-LDLT had higher incidence of sepsis (69.0% vs. 43.6%; P < 0.01) and intra-abdominal infections (60.0% vs. 30.9%; P < 0.01). Biliary complication rates (14.5% vs. 19.1%; P = 0.47) and 1-and 5-year GS (87.27%, 74.60% vs. 83.64%, 72.71%; P = 0.98) and OS (89.09%, 78.44% vs. 84.55%, 73.70%; P = 0.752) rates were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SBR could serve as a life-saving procedure for patients undergoing complex critical LDLT, with GS, OS, and biliary outcomes comparable to those of OSBR.

Magnets in action: role of interventional radiologists in magnetic compression anastomosis procedures

Obstructions encountered in biliary, gastrointestinal, and urinary tracts are increasing in number due to successful percutaneous and endoscopic organ-saving procedures. Although functional recovery is established to an extent, failure of traversing an obstruction may end up necessitating invasive surgical procedures. Multidisciplinary collaboration may traverse the limitations of each individual approach, therefore creating the perfect intervention for the patient. Magnetic compression anastomosis is a minimally invasive procedure that can provide a great outcome in select cases with biliary, gastrointestinal, or urinary tract obstructions. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In this article, various applications of magnetic compression anastomosis are reviewed with illustrative cases of esophageal, biliary, colonic, and urinary obstructions that cannot be traversed with a wire. This method will expand the spectrum of interventions performed in the IR unit. KEY POINTS: Magnets can enable wire access beyond an impassable obstruction. Magnets can create anatomical and non-anatomical anastomosis at an occlusion. Magnetic compression anastomosis is a minimally invasive procedure that can provide great outcomes.

Post-liver transplant biliary complications

Biliary complications (BCs) are the most frequent complications following liver transplantation (LT). They are a major source of morbidity after LT. The incidence of BCs after LT is reported to range from 5% to 45%. The main post-LT biliary complications are strictures, biliary fistulas and bilomas, cholelithiasis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, hemobilia, and mucocele. Risk factors for biliary complications are diverse. In this article we seek to review the main types of biliary complications and modern approaches to their diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical usefulness of inside stents in anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation

Background

Endoscopic biliary stenting is a standard treatment for biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Plastic stents are often replaced before stent dysfunction to prevent the development of cholangitis and jaundice. Therefore, the precise duration of stent patency is unclear.

Methods

We compared retrospectively the stent patency period and stent dysfunction rate between inside stents (IS) and conventional plastic stents (PS) in 48 patients with post-transplant strictures, distinguishing endoscopic biliary stenting with and without stent dysfunction at stent replacement.

Results

In observations focused on the first treatment, the median patency periods were 369 days for IS (n = 18) and 154 days for PS (n = 30; p = 0.01), significantly longer for IS. The 1-year cholangitis incidence rate was lower for IS (20% vs. 43%, p = 0.04). Additionally, no stent dislocation was observed for IS, but this occurred for 33.3% of PS (p = 0.004). Comparing all endoscopic biliary stenting, including second and subsequent procedures, IS again had a longer patency period than PS (356 days, n = 89, vs. 196 days, n = 127, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

IS had a significantly longer patency period than PS, suggesting that IS replacement could be reduced to once per year for patients who prefer less frequent stent replacement.

How to do it: rescue duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction techniques to avoid severe biliary complications of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

There are few reports on duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction for complex liver resection with limited bile duct resection. We performed duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in two patients undergoing limited bile duct resection where Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) was difficult. An external biliary drainage tube was placed routinely at the anastomotic site to prevent stenosis. In case 1, the tumor-infiltrated part of the left hepatic duct (LHD) was resected and the LHD was repaired using duct-to-duct reconstruction with interrupted sutures. In case 2, after the tumor-infiltrated part of the LHD and posterior hepatic duct (PHD) were resected, T-tube reconstruction was performed on the PHD, and the LHD was anastomosed using interrupted sutures for the posterior wall and a round ligament patch for the anterior wall. Our literature review suggests that an external biliary drainage tube with stenting over the anastomosis may reduce the risk of biliary complications.

Long-term outcome of combined radiologic and surgical strategy for the management of biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyze the risk factors for management failure of BC after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) by retrospectively analyzing primary pLT performed between 1997 and 2018 (n = 620 patients).

RESULTS

In all, 117/620 patients (19%) developed BC. The median (range) follow-up was 9 (1.4-21) years. Patient survival at 1, 5 and 10 years was 88.9%, 85.7%, 84.4% and liver graft survival was 82.4%, 77.4%, and 74.3% respectively. Graft not patient survival was impaired by BC (p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified the number of dilatation courses > 2 (p = 0.008), prolonged cold ischemia time (p = 0.004), anastomosed multiple biliary ducts (p = 0.019) and hepatic artery thrombosis (p = 0.01) as factors associated with impaired graft survival. The number of dilatation courses > 2 (p < 0.001) and intrahepatic vs anastomotic stricture (p = 0.014) were associated with management failure. Thus, repeated (> 2) radiologic dilatation courses are associated with impaired graft survival and management failure. Overall, graft but not patient survival was impaired by BC.

Initial outcome of external biliary drainage in living donor liver transplantation with pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy

Biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are the most common and intractable complications due to both surgical and nonsurgical factors. External biliary drainage (EBD), a surgical option to prevent biliary complications, has recently been adopted in the era of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy, which may result in increased bile duct problems in the recipients. This study retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent LDLT with duct-to-duct anastomosis between July 2017 and October 2020 to analyze the initial outcomes of EBD and to compare the incidence of biliary complications in adult LDLT recipients who underwent duct-to-duct anastomosis with or without EBD. Only patients who underwent pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy were included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the application of EBD. The median follow-up period was 28.5 months. The overall incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa biliary complications was 35.0% (n=14) in the EBD group and 50.7% (n=76) in the non-EBD group ( p = 0.08). The incidence of biliary leakage was 0% in the EBD group and 15.3% in the non-EBD group ( p = 0.01). The EBD-related complication rate, that is, involving retraction, accidental removal, and dislocation, was 40.0%. EBD implementation is effective in preventing biliary leakage after LDLT with a graft procured using the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy method with duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis. However, efforts should be made to prevent EBD-related complications. Further studies are needed to establish appropriate selection criteria for EBD.

Gastroduodenal artery disconnection during liver transplantation decreases non-anastomotic stricture incidence

BACKGROUND

The hepatic artery is the only blood source nourishing the biliary duct and associated with biliary complication after liver transplantation (LT). Gastroduodenal artery (GDA) disconnection increased proper hepatic artery flow. Whether this procedure attenuates biliary non-anastomotic stricture (NAS) is not clear.

METHODS

A total of 241 patients with LT were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the GDA disconnection (GDA-) and GDA preservation (GDA+) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was administrated to reduce bias. Logistic regression was conducted to analyze risk factors for biliary NAS before and after PSM. Postoperative complications were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed to compare overall survival.

RESULTS

In all, 99 patients (41.1%) underwent GDA disconnection, and 49 (20.3%) developed NAS. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that GDA preservation (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.11-4.53; P = 0.025) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score > 15 (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.12-4.11; P = 0.022) were risk factors for biliary NAS. PSM provided 66 pairs using 1:2 matching method, including 66 GDA disconnection and 99 GDA preservation patients. Multivariate logistic regression after PSM also showed that GDA preservation (OR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.26-7.89; P = 0.014) and MELD score > 15 (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.08-5.36; P = 0.031) were risk factors for NAS. When comparing complications between the two groups, GDA preservation was associated with a higher incidence of biliary NAS before and after PSM (P = 0.031 and 0.017, respectively). In contrast, other complications including early allograft dysfunction (P = 0.620), small-for-size graft syndrome (P = 0.441), abdominal hemorrhage (P = 1.000), major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3, P = 0.318), and overall survival (P = 0.088) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GDA disconnection during LT ameliorates biliary NAS incidence and may be recommended for application in clinical practice.

Interrupted versus continuous suture technique for biliary-enteric anastomosis: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA) can be performed using continuous or interrupted suture techniques, but high-quality evidence regarding superiority of either technique is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the suture techniques for patients undergoing BEA by evaluating the suture time as well as short- and long-term biliary complications.

METHODS

In this single-centre randomized clinical trial, patients scheduled for elective open procedure with a BEA between 21 January 2016 and 20 September 2017 were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to have the BEA performed with continuous suture (CSG) or interrupted suture technique (ISG). The primary outcome was the time required to complete the anastomosis. Secondary outcomes were BEA-associated postoperative complications with and without operative revision of the BEA, including bile leakage, cholestasis, and cholangitis, as well as morbidity and mortality up to day 30 after the intervention and survival.

RESULTS

Altogether, 82 patients were randomized of which 80 patients received the allocated intervention (39 in ISG and 41 in CSG). Suture time was longer in the ISG compared with the CSG (median (interquartile range), 22.4 (15.0-28.0) min versus 12.0 (10.0-17.0) min, OR 1.26, 95 per cent c.i. 1.13 to 1.40; unit of increase of 1 min; P < 0.001). Short-term and long-term biliary complications were similar between groups. The incidence of bile leakage (6 (14.6 per cent) versus 4 (10.3 per cent), P = 0.738) was comparable between groups. No anastomotic stenosis occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

Continuous suture of BEA is equally safe, but faster compared with interrupted suture.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02658643 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Do We Need to Use a Stent in Biliary Reconstruction to Decrease the Incidence of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Biliary complications are a significant cause of morbidity post-transplantation, and the routine use of biliary stents in liver transplantation to reduce these complications remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of biliary complications with and without the use of trans anastomotic biliary stent in liver transplantation.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched for eligible studies from inception to February 2022, and a systematic review and meta-analysis were done to compare the incidence of biliary complications in the two groups.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies with a total of 2623 patients were included. The pooled results from the included studies showed an equal rate of biliary complications (i.e., strictures, leaks and cholangitis) in stented and non-stented patients after liver transplantation. However, the cost and biliary intervention rates are higher in stented patients. In addition to that, our sub-group analysis showed no significant decrease in the incidence of biliary complications after using trans anastomotic biliary stent in living donor liver transplant (LDLT), deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT), Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ), and duct-to-duct anastomosis, pediatric, and adult liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

No added benefit on the routine use of endobiliary stent in liver transplantation. However, stented patients are at higher risk of needing multiple ERCPs.

Assessment of serum and drain fluid bilirubin concentrations in liver transplantation patients

BACKGROUND

Bile leakage is a major complication after liver transplantation and remains as a significant source of morbidity and mortality. In 2011, the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) defined bile leakage as a drain/serum bilirubin ratio ≥3. However, to our knowledge there is no literature assessing serum and drain bilirubin concentrations after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to describe the natural postoperative changes in serum and drain fluid bilirubin concentrations in patients after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We included 32 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Kobe University Hospital from January 2007 to December 2020. We enrolled 34 living donors who had no complications as the control group.

RESULTS

The recipient serum total/direct bilirubin concentration were higher compared with the donors from postoperative day (POD) 1 to 5 with a statistical difference (P < .05). The recipient drain/serum total bilirubin ratio was lower than donors on POD 3 (0.89 ± 0.07 vs 1.53 ± 0.07: P < .0001), which was also confirmed by the recipient drain/serum direct bilirubin ratio (0.64 ± 0.10 vs 1.18 ± 0.09: P < .0001). On POD 3, the drain fluid volume (647.38 ± 89.47 vs 113.43 ± 86.8 mL: P < .001) and serum total bilirubin concentration (6.73 ± 0.61 vs 1.23 ± 0.60 mg/dL: P < .001) was higher in the recipients than in donors. Categorized in 2 groups, the higher drain fluid volume and bilirubin concentration recipients showed lower drain/serum total bilirubin ratio compared with the other group (P = .03) CONCLUSION: The drain/serum bilirubin ratio in the transplanted patients could be calculated lower compared with the hepatectomy patients because of high drain fluid volume and hyperbilirubinemia. Great care should be taken when assessing the bile leakage in liver transplant recipients using the ISGLS definition.

Meta-analysis of interrupted versus continuous suturing for Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy

AIMS

To compare outcomes of interrupted (IS) and continuous (CS) suturing techniques for Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy.

METHODS

The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021286294). A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science and bibliographic reference lists were conducted (last search: 14th March 2022). All comparative studies reporting outcomes of IS and CS in hepaticojejunostomy and choledochocholedochostomy were included and their risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Overall biliary complications, bile leak, biliary stricture, cholangitis, liver abscess, and anastomosis time were the evaluated outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Ten comparative studies (2 prospective and 8 retrospective) were included which reported 1617 patients of whom 1186 patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (IS: 789, CS: 397) and the remaining 431 patients underwent duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy (IS: 168, CS: 263). Although use of IS for hepaticojejunostomy was associated with significantly longer anastomosis time (MD: 14.15 min, p=0.0002) compared to CS, there was no significant difference in overall biliary complications (OR: 1.34, p=0.11), bile leak (OR: 1.64, p=0.14), biliary stricture (OR: 0.84, p=0.65), cholangitis (OR: 1.54, p=0.35), or liver abscess (OR: 0.58, p=0.40) between two groups. Similarly, use of IS for choledochocholedochostomy was associated with no significant difference in risk of overall biliary complications (OR: 0.92, p=0.90), bile leak (OR: 1.70, p=0.28), or biliary stricture (OR: 1.07, p=0.92) compared to CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Interrupted and continuous suturing techniques for Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy seem to have comparable clinical outcomes. The available evidence may be subject to confounding by indication with respect to diameter of bile duct. Future high-quality research is encouraged to report the outcomes with respect to duct diameter and suture material.

Paired Exchange Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Nine-year Experience From North India

BACKGROUND

Paired exchange liver transplantation is an evolving strategy to overcome ABO blood group incompatibility and other barriers such as inadequate graft-to-recipient weight ratio and low remnant liver volume in donors. However, for the transplant team to carry 4 major operations simultaneously is a Herculean effort. We analyzed our experience with liver paired exchange (LPE) program over the past 9 y.

METHODS

This prospective study included 34 of 2340 (1.45%) living donor liver transplantations performed between May 2012 and April 2021. The reason for LPE was ABO incompatibility in all (n = 34) patients included in the study. After donor reassignment through 2-by-2 paired exchange with directed donors, the ABO matching status changed from A to A (n = 17) and B to B (n = 17), which made all matches ABO-identical. Recipients (R) and donors (D) of each swap pair were prospectively divided into R1/D1 and R2/D2 groups for comparative and survival analyses.

RESULTS

The recipients (n = 34) had a median age of 45.5 y (11-59 y), and 31 were men. LPEs were performed in 4 operating rooms running simultaneously by 2 independent surgical teams. Donor survival was 100%. Baseline clinical and perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, median intensive care unit/hospital stay, and early deaths were comparable (P > 0.1) between the R1 and R2 groups. The median follow-up period was 27 mo (1-108 mo). The 30-d and 1-y survivals were 88.2% (n = 30) and 85.3% (n = 29), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience suggests that with careful attention to ethical and logistical issues, the LPE program can expand the living donor liver pool and facilitate a greater number of living donor liver transplantations.

Continuous or interrupted suture technique for hepaticojejunostomy during pancreatoduodenectomy (HEKTIK trial): study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Hepaticojejunostomy is commonly performed in hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery, particularly during pancreaticoduodenectomy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficiency of two commonly applied suture techniques (the interrupted versus the continuous suture technique) in patients undergoing a hepaticojejunostomy during pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

The HEKTIK trial is a multicenter, randomized controlled, patient-blinded surgical explorative trial with two parallel study groups. An adaptive sample size design was chosen: First, 100 patients scheduled for surgery including a hepaticojejunostomy will be randomized 1:1 either to the interrupted suture technique or the continuous suture technique after informed consent. Based on this data, needed sample size will be adjusted. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of anastomotic leakage of hepaticojejunostomy, defined as bilirubin concentration in the drain fluid at least 3 times the serum bilirubin concentration on or after postoperative day 3 or as the need for radiologic or operative intervention resulting from biliary collections or bile peritonitis (according to the definition of ISGLS). Further perioperative parameters like other morbidities as well as duration and costs of the hepaticojejunostomy will be analyzed as secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Until now there are no randomized controlled comparative data of these two suture techniques for hepaticojejunostomy. The HEKTIK trial will investigate the yet unanswered question of whether the interrupted suture or the continuous suture technique has advantages performing a hepaticojejunostomy during pancreatoduodenectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00024395 . Registered on 01 February 2021.

Role of the Intramural Vascular Network of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct for the Blood Circulation in the Recipient Extrahepatic Bile Duct Used for Duct-to-Duct-Biliary-Anastomosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

A duct-to-duct-biliary-anastomosis is the preferred biliary reconstruction technique in liver transplantation; biliary complications remain the major concerns for the technique. We examined the significance of the intramural vascular network of the extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) and its relevant vessels. We microscopically examined the axial sections of the EBD with 5 mm intervals of 10 formalin-fixed deceased livers. The luminal-areas of the 3 and 9 o’clock arteries correlated significantly and positively with the distance from the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts (the 3 o’clock artery, r = 0.42, p < 0.001; the 9 o’clock artery, r = 0.39, p < 0.001); the ratios of the numbers of the intramural vessels to the areas of the corresponding sections of the EBD significantly correlated positively with the distance from the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts (total vessels, r = 0.78, p < 0.001; arterioles, r = 0.52, p < 0.001; venules, r = 0.45, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that there is a significant locoregional distributional heterogeneity of the intramural vessels among the EBD. The hepatic arteries neighboring the EBD primarily supply the blood flow to the EBD; thus, when the broader isolation of the EBD from the neighboring arteries is necessary, this locoregional distributional heterogeneity of the intramural vessels may render the EBD likely to suffer ischemia of the anastomotic site.

Post-transplant biliary complications: advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative therapy in patients with end-stage liver disease. Long-term survival is excellent, yet LT recipients are at risk of significant complications. Biliary complications are an important source of morbidity after LT, with an estimated incidence of 5%-32%. Post-LT biliary complications include strictures (anastomotic and non-anastomotic), bile leaks, stones, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Prompt recognition and management is critical as these complications are associated with mortality rates up to 20% and retransplantation rates up to 13%. This review aims to summarise our current understanding of risk factors, natural history, diagnostic testing, and treatment options for post-transplant biliary complications.

Reconstruction of Separated Intrahepatic Ducts Using the Cystic and Common Hepatic Ducts in Right-Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Experiences of Surgical Techniques, Biliary Complications, and Outcomes in a Single Institution

BACKGROUND Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction has been increasingly used in living-donor liver transplantation. Information regarding dual duct-to-duct biliary anastomoses is limited. We present the largest case series to date on the use of the cystic and common hepatic ducts as dual-ductal anastomosis, along with long-term follow-up results. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this study, 740 patients underwent right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation; 56 of them were documented as dual-ductal anastomoses. We analyzed recipient and donor characteristics, surgical procedures, appearance of biliary complications, corresponding interventions, and long-term biliary outcomes. RESULTS Cystic and common hepatic ducts were utilized in 56 cases of dual-ductal biliary reconstruction, which we categorized into 2 types: A (78.6%), in which the right anterior intrahepatic duct was anastomosed to the common hepatic duct and the right posterior intrahepatic duct to the cystic duct; and B (21.4%), which was the reverse of A. After a median follow-up period of 46.4 months, 23 patients (41.1%) experienced complications, including biliary leakage and biliary stricture. However, after aggressive intervention (patent biliary anastomosis in most of them), 50 of 56 patients (89.3%) had patent biliary anastomosis and restored normal liver function at the end of follow-up. A small graft (graft-to-recipient weight ratio <0.9%) was the only predictor of biliary complications after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Dual-ductal biliary reconstruction in adult right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation is challenging but feasible. Our findings support the use of the cystic duct for reconstruction in selected patients. Good long-term results can be achieved with adequate management of patients with biliary complications.

Long-term Outcomes of Stent Placement Inside the Bile Duct for Biliary Strictures After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), anastomotic biliary stricture is a serious and refractory complication. In this study, we reviewed the transition of post-LDLT anastomotic biliary strictures and evaluated long-term outcomes of stent placement inside the bile duct, which is referred to as an "inside-stent." Of 805 consecutive adult LDLT recipients in our institution (2000-2018), we reviewed 639 patients with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction and analyzed chronological changes of post-LDLT biliary strictures. Moreover, we focused on the year 2006 when various surgical modifications were introduced and compared the details of post-LDLT biliary strictures before and after 2006, especially focusing on the long-term outcome of inside-stent placement. The proportion of left lobe grafts had increased from 1.8% before 2005 to 39.3% after 2006 (P < 0.001) to maximize the living donor safety. Overall, post-LDLT anastomotic biliary strictures occurred in 21.3% of the patients with a median follow-up period of 106.1 months, which was decreased from 32.6% before 2005 to 12.8% after 2006 (P < 0.001). Anastomotic biliary strictures were less frequent in patients with left lobe grafts than with right lobe grafts (9.4% versus 25.4%; P < 0.001). The overall technical success rate of inside-stent placement was 82.4%, with an improvement from 75.3% before 2005 up to 95.7% after 2006 (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the stricture resolution rate remained high at approximately 90% throughout the observation period. Increased use of left lobe grafts with several surgical modifications significantly reduced post-LDLT anastomotic biliary strictures, leading to favorable long-term outcomes of inside-stent placements for this condition.

Economics and safety of continuous and interrupted suture hepaticojejunostomy: An audit of 556 surgeries

Backgrounds/Aims

Hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for bilioenteric continuity is generally performed with interrupted sutures. This study compares the safety, economics, short- and long-term outcomes of continuous suture hepaticojejunostomy (CSHJ) and interrupted suture hepaticojejunostomy (ISHJ).

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis involving all HJs between January 2014 and December 2018 was conducted. Patients with type IV or V biliary strictures, duct diameter < 8 mm and/or associated vascular injury, and liver transplant recipients were excluded. Patient demographics, preoperative parameters including diagnosis, intra-operative parameters including type and number of sutures, suture time, and postoperative morbidity (based on Clavien-Dindo classification) were recorded. Patients were followed up to 60 months. McDonald&rsquo;s Grade A and B outcomes were considered favorable. Cost according to suture type and number (polydioxanone 3-0/5-0 mean cost, US$ 9.26/length; polyglactin 3-0/4-0 mean cost, US$ 6.56/length), and operation room charge (US$ 67.47/hour) were compared between the two techniques. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS ver. 22 software.

Results

A total of 556 eligible patients (468 patients undergoing ISHJ and 88 undergoing CSHJ; 47% [n = 261] with malignant and 53% [n = 295] with benign pathology) were analyzed. The two groups were similar. Number of sutures, cost, time, and postoperative bile leak were significantly higher in the ISHJ group. Bile leak occurred in 54 patients (6 CSHJ, 48 ISHJ). Septic shock-induced death occurred in 16 cases (3 CSHJ, 13 ISHJ). Morbidity and the anastomotic stricture rates were comparable in both groups.

Conclusions

CSHJ is a safe, economical, and worthy of routine use.

Intractable Biliary Strictures After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Biliary stricture (BS) is a severe complication after liver transplantation. It is difficult to treat, especially after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We successfully treated 4 patients for intractable BS after LDLT. All patients had developed cholangitis with stenosis of bile ducts anastomosis. CASE 1: . A 65-year-old woman underwent LDLT with right lobe graft and duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. Internal plastic stents inserted by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) were changed quarterly for the next 2 years. CASE 2: A 55-year-old man underwent LDLT with right lobe graft and duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. Insertion of internal plastic stents by ERC was attempted; however, the posterior bile duct branch showed complete obstruction. After percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD), the stents were inserted using the rendezvous technique of ERC and were changed by ERC quarterly for the next 3 years. CASE 3: A 22-year-old man underwent LDLT with left lobe graft and hepaticojejunostomy. An external drainage tube was inserted by PTCD, and stents were changed quarterly for the next 2 years. CASE 4: A 60-year-old man underwent LDLT with right lobe graft and hepaticojejunostomy. An external drainage tube was inserted by PTCD, and changed to a metallic stent after 1 year. Three months later the stent was extracted using the rendezvous technique of double balloon enteroscopy.

CONCLUSION

BS of complete obstruction type after LDLT is difficult to treat. Appropriate procedures should be chosen based on the types of strictures and biliary reconstruction methods.

Optimal drainage of anastomosis stricture after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) with a fully covered, self-expandable metallic stent (FC-SEMS) and plastic stent (PS) is safe and efficient for biliary anastomotic strictures (ASs) after a deceased donor liver transplantation. Limited studies have investigated the use of FC-SEMSs for biliary strictures post-living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We compared the resolution rate of biliary ASs post-LDLT and the 12-month recurrence rates post-stent removal between EBS with an FC-SEMS, PS, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD).

METHODS

Patients with biliary ASs after an LDLT (mean age: 57.3 years, 76.1% men) hospitalized between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was repeated every 3-4 months. Patients were followed-up for at least 1-year post-stent removal.

RESULTS

Of the 75 patients enrolled, 16, 20, and 39 underwent EBS with an FC-SEMS, PS, and PTBD, respectively. Median follow-up period was 39.2 months. Fewer ERCP procedures were needed in the FC-SEMS group than in the PS group (median, 2 vs. 3; P = 0.20). Median stent indwelling periods were 4.7, 9.3, and 5.4 months in the FC-SEMS, PS, and PTBD groups, respectively (P = 0.006). The functional resolution rate was lower in the PS group (16/20) than in the FC-SEMS (16/16) or PTBD (39/39) group (P = 0.005). The radiologic resolution rate was higher in the FC-SEMS group (16/16) than in the PS group (14/20) (P = 0.07). The 12-month recurrence rates showed no significant differences (FC-SEMS, 4/16; PS, 3/16; PTBD, 6/39; P = 0.66). The rates of complications during treatment differed significantly between the groups (P = 0.04). Stent migration occurred in 1 (6.3%) and 5 (25.0%) patients in the FC-SEMS and PS groups, respectively (P = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

EBS with an FC-SEMS is comparable with EBS with a PS or PTBD in terms of biliary stricture resolution and 12-month recurrence rates. The use of FC-SEMSs is potentially effective and safe for biliary AS resolution after LDLT.

Correlation Among 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography, Intraoperative Cholangiography, and Intraoperative Findings in Right Liver Donors

OBJECTIVES

A correct preoperative definition of the hepatic duct confluence anatomy of right liver living donors is pivotal in determining their candidacy for donation and planning surgery during liver transplant. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography compared with intraoperative cholangiography in assessing biliary anatomy and aimed to identify imaging characteristics that may help to predict the yield of hepatic duct orifices in the right liver graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive living hepa-tectomy donors for adult liver transplant included in this study (N = 110) were evaluated with preoperative 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography, which was performed before and after intravenous administration of gadolinium (20-40 cm³). For intraoperative cholangiography, a 4F catheter was advanced through the cystic duct, and contrast matter (5-10 mL) was injected into the biliary tree via the catheter. The number of right hepatic ducts in explanted graft was determined on the back table.

RESULTS

Of 110 donors, 71 had type 1 (normal) biliary anatomy based on both 3-dimensional magnetic resonance and intraoperative cholangiography and 39 had abnormal biliary anatomy, with 2 having type 3 (abnormal) biliary anatomy. Normal biliary anatomy was found in back-table examination, and abnormal biliary anatomy (type 2) was found with intraoperative cholangiography. Sensitivity, specificity, and predic-tive values of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography in revealing the biliary anatomy and anomalies were compared with intraoperative cholangiography findings. Observed final hepatic duct outcomes were also assessed. Use of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography accurately predicted the biliary anatomy in 97 of 110 cases. Sensitivity was 80.4%, positive predictive value was 94.4%, specificity was 96.9%, and negative predictive value was 87.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiography reliably represented normal biliary anatomy; the presence of anatomic variations decreased its sensitivity, making intraoperative cholangiography or duct probing necessary tools to accurately perform right hepatic duct transection.

Bilioenteric Reconstruction Techniques in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Biliary complications (BCs) are still a major cause of morbidity following liver transplantation despite the advancements in the surgical technique. Although Roux-en-Y (RY) hepaticojejunostomy has been the standard technique for years in pediatric patients, there is a limited number of reports on the feasibility of duct-to-duct (DD) anastomosis, and those reports have controversial outcomes. With the largest number of patients ever reported on the topic, this study aims to discuss the feasibility of the DD biliary reconstruction technique in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). After the exclusion of the patients with biliary atresia, patients who received either deceased donor or right lobe grafts, and retransplantation patients, data from 154 pediatric LDLTs were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the applied biliary reconstruction technique, and the groups were compared using BCs as the outcome. The overall BC rate was 13% (n = 20), and the groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.6). Stricture was more frequent in the DD reconstruction group; however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.6). The rate of bile leak was also similar in both groups (P = 0.6). The results show that the DD reconstruction technique can achieve similar outcomes when compared with RY anastomosis. Because DD reconstruction is a more physiological way of establishing bilioenteric integrity, it can safely be applied.

Post-liver transplant biliary complications: Current knowledge and therapeutic advances

Liver transplantation is the current standard of care for end-stage liver disease and an accepted therapeutic option for acute liver failure and primary liver tumors. Despite the remarkable advances in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapy, the postoperative morbidity and mortality still remain high and the leading causes are biliary complications, which affect up to one quarter of recipients. The most common biliary complications are anastomotic and non-anastomotic biliary strictures, leaks, bile duct stones, sludge and casts. Despite the absence of a recommended treatment algorithm many options are available, such as surgery, percutaneous techniques and interventional endoscopy. In the last few years, endoscopic techniques have widely replaced the more aggressive percutaneous and surgical approaches. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is the preferred technique when duct-to-duct anastomosis has been performed. Recently, new devices and techniques have been developed and this has led to a remarkable increase in the success rate of minimally invasive procedures. Understanding the mechanisms of biliary complications helps in their early recognition which is the prerequisite for successful treatment. Aggressive endoscopic therapy is essential for the reduction of morbidity and mortality in these cases. This article focuses on the common post-transplant biliary complications and the available interventional treatment modalities.

Complications of polytetrafluoroethylene graft use in middle hepatic vein reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective, single-centre, long-term, real-world experience

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of the right lobe, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts may be used for anterior drainage. This study aimed to determine the risk factors of PTFE graft-associated complications. Data from patients who underwent LDLT of the right lobe with middle hepatic vein reconstruction using PTFE grafts between January 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Among 360 patients, PTFE graft-associated complications occurred in 17 patients (group B) (4.7%); recipients without these complications comprised group A (95.3%). The 1-, 6- and 12-month patency rates were significantly lower in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.002 and P = 0.007). In group B, eight patients (47.1%) required surgical intervention, three patients (17.6%) suffered from infectious complications, and 14 patients (82.4%) experienced PTFE graft migration into the adjacent organs, namely the common bile duct (n = 3, 17.6%), stomach (n = 1, 5.9%), duodenum (n = 5, 29.4%) and jejunum (n = 5, 29.4%). The proportion of recipients who underwent hepaticojejunostomy, had abdominal adhesions and received interventions in/around the liver after LDLT was higher in group B (P < 0.001). Although the incidence of PTFE graft-associated complication is low, close long-term follow-up is needed, especially in patients with risk factors.

Diagnosis and management of benign biliary strictures post liver transplantation in adults

Benign biliary strictures after liver transplantation are common and can lead to graft dysfunction and decreased patient survival. Post-transplant strictures are classified as anastomotic or non-anastomotic which differ in response to therapy. Risk factors for biliary strictures following transplantation include impaired blood supply, surgical factors, and biliary anomalies. Patients can present with biliary obstruction but most will be asymptomatic, with only abnormal graft function. MRCP is the most sensitive noninvasive tool for diagnosing biliary complications. In most centres worldwide endoscopy is used first-line in the management of anastomotic strictures, although there is significant variation in endoscopic technique employed; including dilation, placing a single or multiple plastic stents, a fully covered metal stent and most recently using intra-ductal fully covered metal stents. With the introduction of fully covered metal stents the number of interventions patients require has reduced and overall the clinical success of the endoscopic approach has steadily improved. Percutaneous and surgical treatments are now reserved for patients in whom endoscopic management fails or who have had Roux-en-Y anastomoses. However even in these cases, combined procedures with interventional radiology, or implementation of enteroscopy and EUS-guided approaches now means very few patients ultimately require surgical revision.

Post-operative imaging anatomy in liver transplantation

The article describes and illustrates the surgical techniques and the post-operative imaging anatomy in liver transplantation. Special attention is paid to the variant vascular and biliary anatomy that are important for surgical planning. Considering the ever-growing number of liver transplants performed and the key role that imaging plays in the pre-operative planning and post-operative assessment, it is important for the radiologist to be familiar with the surgical techniques and the normal post-operative appearance in these patients.

Robotic hepaticojejunostomy: surgical technique and risk factor analysis for anastomotic leak and stenosis

BACKGROUND

A variety of techniques have been described for the construction of the HJ (hepaticojejunostomy). Due to its technical challenges, HJ is rarely performed in a pure laparoscopic setting. In stark contrast, the increasing availability of the robotic platform has sparked new interest in pursuing this procedure in a minimally invasive fashion. The aim of our study was to describe our surgical technique and to identify risk factors for anastomotic leak and stenosis following robotic surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, including all consecutive HJ carried out for different indications over a 10 year period.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two patients undergoing robotic HJ performed by the same surgeon were analyzed. Bile leak occurred in 2.6% of the patients. Stricture rate was 3.3%. The median follow up was 25.5 months. There was no mortality related to anastomotic complications. On univariate analysis, patient's age less than 65 years was the only risk factor for anastomotic stricture. On multivariate analysis, no predictor factors for leak or stenosis were identified.

CONCLUSION

HJs carried out in a robotic fashion allow highly satisfactory results. No independent risk factors for bile leak of stenosis were identified on multivariate analysis.

Magnetic Compression Anastomosis for the Treatment of Post-Transplant Biliary Stricture

A number of different conditions can lead to a bile duct stricture. These strictures are particularly common after biliary operations, including living-donor liver transplantation. Endoscopic and percutaneous methods have high success rates in treating benign biliary strictures. However, these conventional methods are difficult to manage when a guidewire cannot be passed through areas of severe stenosis or complete obstruction. Magnetic compression anastomosis has emerged as an alternative nonsurgical treatment method to avoid the mortality and morbidity risks of reoperation. The feasibility and safety of magnetic compression anastomosis have been reported in several experimental and clinical studies in patients with biliobiliary and bilioenteric strictures. Magnetic compression anastomosis is a minimally traumatic and highly effective procedure, and represents a new paradigm for benign biliary strictures that are difficult to treat with conventional methods.

The high-end range of biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent evidence in literature regarding incidence and risk factors for biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and current concepts in evaluation of donor biliary anatomy and surgical techniques of biliary reconstruction, to reduce the incidence of biliary complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in biliary imaging in the donor, both before surgery, and during donor hepatectomy, as well as safe hepatic duct isolation in the donor, have played a significant role in reducing biliary complications in both the donor and recipient. Duct-to-duct biliary anastomoses (DDA) is the preferred mode of biliary reconstruction currently, especially when there is a single bile duct orifice in the donor. The debate on stenting the anastomoses, especially a DDA, continues. Stenting a Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy in children with small ductal orifices in the donor is preferred. With growing experience, and use of meticulous surgical technique and necessary modifications, the incidence of biliary complications in multiple donor bile ducts, and more than one biliary anastomoses can be reduced.

SUMMARY

Biliary anastomosis continues to be the Achilles heel of LDLT. Apart from surgical technique, which includes correct choice of type of reconstruction technique and appropriate use of stents across ductal anastomoses, better imaging of the biliary tree, and safe isolation of the graft hepatic duct, could help reduce biliary complications in the recipient, and make donor hepatectomy safe .

From in vitro evaluation to human postmortem pre-validation of a radiopaque and resorbable internal biliary stent for liver transplantation applications

The implantation of an internal biliary stent (IBS) during liver transplantation has recently been shown to reduce biliary complications. To avoid a potentially morbid ablation procedure, we developed a resorbable and radiopaque internal biliary stent (RIBS). We studied the mechanical and radiological properties of RIBS upon in vivo implantation in rats and we evaluated RIBS implantability in human anatomical specimens. For this purpose, a blend of PLA₅₀-PEG-PLA₅₀ triblock copolymer, used as a polymer matrix, and of X-ray-visible triiodobenzoate-poly(ε-caprolactone) copolymer (PCL-TIB), as a radiopaque additive, was used to design X-ray-visible RIBS. Samples were implanted in the peritoneal cavity of rats. The radiological, chemical, and biomechanical properties were evaluated during degradation. Further histological studies were carried out to evaluate the degradation and compatibility of the RIBS. A human cadaver implantability study was also performed. The in vivo results revealed a decline in the RIBS mechanical properties within 3 months, whereas clear and stable X-ray visualization of the RIBS was possible for up to 6 months. Histological analyses confirmed compatibility and resorption of the RIBS, with a limited inflammatory response. The RIBS could be successfully implanted in human anatomic specimens. The results reported in this study will allow the development of trackable and degradable IBS to reduce biliary complications after liver transplantation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Biliary reconstruction during liver transplantation is an important source of postoperative morbidity and mortality although it is generally considered as an easy step of a difficult surgery. In this frame, internal biliary stent (IBS) implantation is beneficial to reduce biliary anastomosis complications (leakage, stricture). However, current IBS are made of non-degradable silicone elastomeric materials, which leads to an additional ablation procedure involving potential complications and additional costs. The present study provides in vitro and human postmortem implantation data related to the development and evaluation of a resorbable and radiopaque internal biliary stent (RIBS) that could tackle these drawbacks.

Impact of middle hepatic artery reconstruction after living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the impact of middle hepatic artery reconstruction on the outcomes of duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using the left lobe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 258 patients who underwent LDLT using the left lobe, 216 patients who underwent hepatic artery reconstruction and one hepatic duct reconstruction with duct-to-duct interrupted anastomosis were divided into three groups: Group A (n = 123), one arterial stump with left hepatic artery reconstruction; Group B (n = 32), two arterial stumps with only left hepatic artery reconstruction; and Group C (n = 61), two arterial stumps with reconstruction of the left and middle hepatic arteries. The outcomes after LDLT were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

No hepatic artery complications occurred. Group B had a significantly greater incidence of anastomotic biliary stricture than Group C. A multivariate analysis with Cox regression revealed that being in Group B was the only significant independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic biliary stricture after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle and left hepatic artery reconstruction is safe in LDLT and may prevent biliary stricture caused by dual hepatic artery reconstruction when the graft has left and middle hepatic artery stumps.

The Impact of Biliary Reconstruction Methods on Small Partial Liver Grafts

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Graft recipient weight ratios are lower in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation than in adult-to-adult deceased-donor liver transplantation. Rapid liver regeneration is essential for increased recipient survival rates in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation. However, the influence of biliary reconstruction methods, including choledocho-choledochostomy and choledocho-jejunostomy, on small partial liver grafts remains unknown. Herein, we investigate the impact of these biliary reconstruction methods on small partial liver grafts.

Decreased long-term graft survival in persistent biliary complications after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic treatment of post-transplant biliary complications have not been fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of biliary complications on graft survival after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (R-LDLT).

METHOD

From a single-institutional prospectively maintained database, all patients who underwent R-LDLT between 1999 and 2017 were included. Data on patient demographics, complications, endoscopic treatment, and graft survival were retrieved for analyses.

RESULTS

Among 111 patients who underwent R-LDLT, 33 (29.7%) developed biliary complications; of these, 19 (17.1%) were treated with biliary stenting, and the stent was removed following resolution of biliary complications in 8 of the 19 (42.1%) patients. The graft survival rate was 88.0% and 85.6% at 5- and 10-year follow-up, respectively, in patients without biliary complications, which was similar to that of the patients with resolved biliary complications (81.3% at 5- and 10-year follow-up, P = .68) but higher than that of patients having persistent (unresolved) biliary complications (61.4% and 49.1% at 5- and 10-year follow-up, respectively, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Post-transplant persistent biliary complications, unresolved after endoscopic management and requiring prolonged biliary stenting, are associated with inferior graft survival. However, patients with resolved biliary complications achieve a favorable long-term survival similar to patients without biliary complications.

Effect of Right Posterior Bile Duct Anatomy on Biliary Complications in Patients Undergoing Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the influence of the localization of right posterior bile duct anatomy relative to portal vein of the donors on posttransplant bile duct complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 141 patients who had undergone living donor liver transplant using right hemiliver grafts. The patients were classified based on the pattern of the right posterior bile duct and divided into infraportal and supraportal types. Clinical donor and recipient risk factors and surgical outcomes were compared for their relationship with biliary complications using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were similar according to demographic and clinical features. The biliary complication rate was 23.7% (9/38) in the infraportal group and 47.4% (37/78) in the supraportal group (P = .014). An analysis of risk factors for the development of anastomotic bile leak using logistic regression showed that a supraportal right posterior bile duct anatomy was a statistically significant positive predictor, with odds ratio of 18.905 (P = .012; confidence interval, 1.922-185.967). The distance of the right posterior bile duct from confluence was significantly lower in patients with biliary complications than in those without (mean of 7.66 vs 0.40 mm; P = .044). According to receiver operating characteristic analyses, the cut-off point for the length of right bile duct to right posterior bile duct from the hepatic confluence was 9.5 mm regarding presence of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors influencing bile duct anastomosis leakage were supraportal-type donor bile duct anatomy and length of the right main bile duct from biliary confluence. Hepatic arterial complications were similarly a risk factor for biliary strictures. Because of the multiple factors leading to complications in living donor liver transplant, it is challenging to group these patients by operative risk; however, establishing risk models may facilitate the prediction of complications.

Paradigm shift in the management of bile duct strictures complicating living donor liver transplantation

AIM

Validation of new metrics to identify functionally significant obstruction (FSO), to better define biliary strictures complicating living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

All LDLT recipients who presented with cholestasis were studied. Novel metrics for FSO are as follows: (1) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) ductal ratio (MDR): The ratio between hepatic duct and recipient duct diameter on the MRCP taken at presentation; (2) endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) ductal ratio (EDR): The ratio between hepatic duct and recipient duct diameter on the first ERC done for suspected biliary strictures; (3) delayed contrast drainage (DCD): > 50% contrast retained above the anastomotic site, in more than three consecutive fluoroscopic images taken at least 15 min after contrast instillation. Association between these metrics and endotherapy response was analyzed along with patient demographics, intraoperative variables (cold ischemia time, blood transfusions, biliary anastomosis) and perioperative complications (hepatic artery thrombosis [HAT], bile leak). Favorable response to endotherapy was defined as symptomatic relief with ≥ 80% reduction in total bilirubin/alkaline phosphatase.

RESULTS

A total of 83 LDLT recipients presented with altered liver function tests. Favorable response was seen in 18/39 patients (46.2%). On univariate analysis, HAT, multiple biliary anastomoses, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), MDR, EDR and DCD were significant (p value ≤ 0.05). On multivariate analysis, only MDR ≥ 1.15 was an independent predictor of favorable response to endotherapy (OR 48 [95% CI 7.096-324.71]).

CONCLUSION

A paradigm shift in the approach to management of biliary strictures complicating LDLT is proposed whereby a multidimensional definition of FSO can help in reliable patient selection for endotherapy and improve patient outcome as a whole.

Antegrade Hepatic Artery and Portal Vein Perfusion Versus Portal Vein Perfusion Alone in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Trial

Traditionally, deceased donor liver grafts receive dual perfusion (DP) through the portal vein and the hepatic artery (HA) either in situ or on the back table. HA perfusion is avoided in living donor liver grafts for fear of damage to the intima and consequent risk of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). However, biliary vasculature is predominantly derived from the HA. We hypothesized that antegrade perfusion of the HA in addition to the portal vein on the back table could reduce the incidence of postoperative biliary complications. Consecutive adult patients undergoing living donor liver transplantations were randomized after donor hepatectomy to receive graft perfusion of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution either via both the HA and portal vein (DP group, n = 62) or only through the portal vein (standard perfusion [SP] group, n = 62). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of biliary complications (biliary leak/stricture). Secondary endpoints included HAT and patient survival. The incidence of biliary stricture was significantly lower in the DP group (6.5% versus 19.4%; odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.95; P = 0.04). There was no significant reduction in the incidence of HAT, bile leak, or hospital stay between the 2 groups. The 3-year mortality and graft survival rates were significantly higher among patients who received DP compared with SP (P = 0.004 and P = 0.003, respectively). On multivariate analysis, nonperfusion of the HA and preceding bile leak were found to be risk factors for the development of biliary stricture (P = 0.04 and P < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, DP of living donor liver grafts through both the HA and portal vein on the back table may protect against the development of biliary stricture. This could translate to improved patient survival in the short term.

The Causes and Outcomes of Early Relaparotomy Following Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Early relaparotomy of adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is significantly associated with poor prognosis. However, there are few reports focusing on pediatric recipients after LDLT. The aim of this study is to clarify the causes and outcomes of early relaparotomy after pediatric LDLT. A total of 265 pediatric recipients (272 LDLTs) transplanted from May 2001 to October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Early relaparotomy was defined as surgical intervention performed within 3 months after LDLT. Early relaparotomy was performed 49 times for 33 recipients (12.5%). The recipient and graft survival rates in the early relaparotomy group were significantly lower than those in the nonearly relaparotomy group, respectively (75.0% and 63.6% versus 96.6% and 95.8%; both P < 0.001). Left lateral segment grafts were used significantly more frequently in the nonrelaparotomy group (P = 0.01). According to the multivariate analysis, the preoperative Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD)/Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of the early relaparotomy group was significantly higher than that of the nonearly relaparotomy group (13.7 versus 6.3; P = 0.04). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the preoperative PELD/MELD score cutoff point was 17.2. Early relaparotomy due to infectious causes led to significantly poorer graft survival than that due to noninfectious causes (P = 0.04). In conclusion, the recipient and graft survival rates of the early relaparotomy group were significantly lower than those of the nonearly relaparotomy group. A high preoperative PELD/MELD score was a risk factor for early relaparotomy. In particular, early relaparotomy due to infection showed a poor prognosis.

Portojejunostomy in Split Liver Transplantation as a Rescue Technique for Challenging Biliary Reconstruction: A Case Report

Cadaveric split liver transplantation (SLT) is a valid option to increase the pool of cadaveric organs, obtaining 2 functioning grafts from a single donor. Typically, SLT is performed for 1 adult and 1 pediatric recipient. However, on the heels of great results achieved in living donor liver transplantation, splitting cadaveric liver into full right graft and full left graft for 2 adults has become a feasible idea. The rate of biliary complications remains the "Achilles heel" in partial graft liver transplantation, either from cadaveric or living donors. In cases of biliary complications, interventional radiology and/or endoscopic procedures are the cornerstone of management. Surgical revision is left as the last option. When surgical revision fails, retransplantation becomes the only rescue option. Herein we describe the case of a cadaveric SLT, complicated by biliary leakage in the presence of multiple bile ducts. A duct-to-duct anastomosis was not feasible. Therefore, a hepaticojejunostomy was performed and resulted in a high-output biliary leak from different sources. Given the anatomy of the biliary tree, radiologic interventional measures were not feasible to address the leak. The idea of performing a portoenterostomy to restore bilioenteric continuity proved to be successful. Portoenterostomy should not be performed in lieu of other alternatives, but rather as the last option to avoid retransplantation in cases of complicated biliary reconstruction after partial graft liver transplant.