Laparoscopic incisional and umbilical hernia repair in cirrhotic patients

Guidance document: risk assessment of patients with cirrhosis prior to elective non-hepatic surgery

As a result of the increasing incidence of cirrhosis in the UK, more patients with chronic liver disease are being considered for elective non-hepatic surgery. A historical reluctance to offer surgery to such patients stems from general perceptions of poor postoperative outcomes. While this is true for those with decompensated cirrhosis, selected patients with compensated early-stage cirrhosis can have good outcomes after careful risk assessment. Well-recognised risks include those of general anaesthesia, bleeding, infections, impaired wound healing, acute kidney injury and cardiovascular compromise. Intra-abdominal or cardiothoracic surgery are particularly high-risk interventions. Clinical assessment supplemented by blood tests, imaging, liver stiffness measurement, endoscopy and assessment of portal pressure (derived from the hepatic venous pressure gradient) can facilitate risk stratification. Traditional prognostic scoring systems including the Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End-stage Liver Disease are helpful but may overestimate surgical risk. Specific prognostic scores like Mayo Risk Score, VOCAL-Penn and ADOPT-LC can add precision to risk assessment. Measures to mitigate risk include careful management of varices, nutritional optimisation and where possible addressing any ongoing aetiological drivers such as alcohol consumption. The role of portal decompression such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting can be considered in selected high-risk patients, but further prospective study of this approach is required. It is of paramount importance that patients are discussed in a multidisciplinary forum, and that patients are carefully counselled about potential risks and benefits.

Modeling Optimal Clinical Thresholds for Elective Abdominal Hernia Repair in Patients With Cirrhosis

IMPORTANCE

Patients with cirrhosis have increased risk of postoperative mortality. Several models have been developed to estimate this risk; however, current risk estimation scores cannot compare surgical risk with the risk of not operating.

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical optimal thresholds to favor operative or nonoperative management for a common cirrhosis surgical scenario, the symptomatic abdominal hernia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a Markov cohort decision analytical modeling study evaluating elective surgery vs nonoperative management for a symptomatic abdominal hernia in a patient with cirrhosis. Transition probabilities and utilities were derived from the literature and from data using an established cirrhosis cohort in the Veterans Health Administration. Participants included patients who were referred to a surgery clinic for a symptomatic abdominal hernia. Data were obtained from patients diagnosed with cirrhosis between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from January 1 to May 1, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated for each pathway and iterated over baseline model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) scores ranging from 6 to 25. Markov models were cycled over a 5-year time horizon.

RESULTS

A total 2740 patients with cirrhosis (median [IQR] age, 62 [56-66] years; 2699 [98.5%] men) were referred to a surgery clinic for a symptomatic abdominal hernia; 1752 patients (63.9%) did not receive surgery. The median (IQR) follow-up was 42.1 (25.3-70.0) months. Using this cohort to estimate the mortality risk of operative and nonoperative pathways, an initial MELD-Na threshold of 21.3 points, below which surgery was associated with maximized QALYs was identified. Nonoperative management was associated with increased QALYs above this MELD-Na threshold. Although more patients experienced death with a surgical treatment decision across all initial MELD-Na values, this was counterbalanced by increased time spent in a resolved hernia state associated with increased utility. Model results were sensitive to the probability of hernia recurrence and hernia incarceration and utility decrement in the symptomatic hernia state.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This decision analytical model study found that elective surgical treatment for a symptomatic abdominal hernia was favored even in the setting of relatively high MELD-Na scores. Patient symptoms, hernia-specific characteristics, and surgeon and center expertise may potentially impact the optimal strategy, emphasizing the importance of shared decision-making.

Laparoscopic repair of diaphragmatic hernia associating with radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although RFA is a relatively safe technique compared with surgery, several complications have been reported to be following/accompanying this treatment. Delayed diaphragmatic hernia caused by RFA is rare; however, the best surgical approach for its treatment is uncertain. We present a case of laparoscopic repair of diaphragmatic hernia due to RFA.

CASE SUMMARY

An 80-year-old woman with segment VIII HCC was treated twice in 5 years with RFA; 28 mo after the second RFA, the patient complained of right hypochondriac pain. Computed tomography revealed that the small intestine was incarcerated in the right thorax. The patient was diagnosed with diaphragmatic hernia and underwent laparoscopic repair by non-absorbable running sutures. The patient’s postoperative course was favorable, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 12. The diaphragmatic hernia has not recurred 24 mo after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic treatment of iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia is effective and minimally invasive.

Umbilical hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis: who, when and how to treat

PURPOSE

Hernia management in patients with cirrhosis is a challenging problem, where indication, timing and type of surgery have been a subject of debate. Given the high risk of morbidity and mortality following surgery, together with increased risk of recurrence, a wait and see approach was often advocated in the past.

METHODS

The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of crucial elements in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and umbilical hernia.

RESULTS

Perioperative ascites control is regarded as the major factor in timing of hernia repair and is considered the most important factor governing outcome. This can be accomplished by either medical treatment, ascites drainage prior to surgery or reduction of portal hypertension by means of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The high incidence of perioperative complications and inferior outcomes of emergency surgery strongly favor elective surgery, instead of a "wait and see" approach, allowing for adequate patient selection, scheduled timing of elective surgery and dedicated perioperative care. The Child-Pugh-Turcotte and MELD score remain strong prognostic parameters and furthermore aid in identifying patients who fulfill criteria for liver transplantation. Such patients should be evaluated for early listing as potential candidates for transplantation and simultaneous hernia repair, especially in case of umbilical vein recanalization and uncontrolled refractory preoperative ascites. Considering surgical techniques, low-quality evidence suggests mesh implantation might reduce hernia recurrence without dramatically increasing morbidity, at least in elective circumstances.

CONCLUSION

Preventing emergency surgery and optimizing perioperative care are crucial factors in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with umbilical hernia and cirrhosis.

Inguinal Hernias in Cirrhotic Patients: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Cirrhosis has a strong association with abdominal wall hernias, especially in the presence of concomitant ascites. Major predisposing factors for hernia formation in this particular group of patients include increased intra-abdominal pressure and decreased muscle mass due to poor nutrition. Management of these patients is highly challenging and requires an experienced multidisciplinary surgical and medical approach. The aim of our review is to clarify crucial diagnostic and management approaches. Crucial medical and technical issues on this topic are widely discussed with special focus on indication, timing, and type of surgical repair, with an additional reference to the actual role of laparoscopy.

Umbilical Hernia Repair in Cirrhotic Patients With Ascites: A Systemic Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Umbilical hernia is a common abdominal complication in cirrhotic patients. The incidence of umbilical hernias can be up to 20% in the presence of ascites. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal management of umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients. The purpose of this study is to review the management of umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

METHODS

A search of the available literature in English since 1980 was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and a search of relevant journals and reference lists. The search terms included "umbilical hernia," "ascites," "cirrhosis," and any derivatives of these terms, and the literature search identified all the relevant publications.

RESULTS

Thirty-three relevant articles published in the language of English were identified. Fourteen studies involved the management of refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients. Twenty-four studies included cirrhotic patients receiving elective or emergency surgery. Because of much lower morbidity and mortality in elective surgery than in emergency surgery, many authors advocated early elective repair of uncomplicated umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients. Of these, 2 studies described laparoscopic umbilical hernioplasty, with a significant lower morbidity and hernia recurrence than open repair. Fifteen studies described the use of prosthetic mesh umbilical hernia repair in cirrhotic patients, which was associated with minimal wound-related morbidity and markedly lower recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that early elective repair of uncomplicated umbilical hernias is recommended in cirrhotic patients with tolerable hepatic functional reserve or when the expected time for liver transplantation is >3 months. Umbilical hernias are supposed to be corrected in the process of liver transplantation, provided that patients could have a better prospect to be transplanted within 3 months. Control of ascites is a crucial part to successful outcomes of umbilical hernia repair. Large volume paracentesis, concomitant peritoneovenous shunting with herniorrhaphy and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting can be applied to control refractory ascites. Emergency repair of umbilical hernias is indicated in cirrhotic patients with ascites when complications develop.

Operative Considerations for the General Surgeon in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Chronic liver disease remains a prevalent and challenging comorbidity in the American population at large. Scarring and fibrosis cause physical and physiological changes that may prove challenging in both medical and surgical management. However, because there has been relevant improvements in preoperative diagnostic, perioperative hepatologic, and intensive care management, as well as in surgical techniques, patients with cirrhosis can safely be operated on but patient selection remains vital. Patients with chronic liver disease may present to a general surgeon for evaluation of a number of elective or emergent surgical conditions. Here, we review current literature on the perioperative management and operative strategies of seemingly routine general surgery issues and provide a review of the pathophysiology associated with chronic liver disease.

Hernia Management in Cirrhosis: Risk Assessment, Operative Approach, and Perioperative Care

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of liver disease has complicated the management of common surgical pathologies. Hernias, in particular, are problematic given the shortage of high-quality data and differing expert opinions. We aim to provide a narrative review of hernia management in cirrhosis as a first step toward developing evidence-based recommendations for the care of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review using separate search strings was conducted for PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Review articles, conference abstracts, randomized clinical trials, and observational studies were included. Articles without a focus on patients with end-stage liver disease were excluded. Manuscripts were selected based on relevance to perioperative risk assessment, medical optimization, surgical decision-making, and considerations of hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis.

RESULTS

The existing literature is varied with regard to focus and quality of data. Of the 4516 articles identified, 51 full-text articles were selected for review. In general, there is evidence to suggest that individuals with compensated cirrhosis may successfully undergo and benefit from hernia repair. Patients at high risk for decompensated cirrhosis may be best served by nonoperative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with cirrhosis may proceed with herniorrhaphy. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to provide high-quality care and improve outcomes.

Acute care and emergency general surgery in patients with chronic liver disease: how can we optimize perioperative care? A review of the literature

The increasing prevalence of advanced cirrhosis among operative candidates poses a major challenge for the acute care surgeon. The severity of hepatic dysfunction, degree of portal hypertension, emergency of surgery, and severity of patients’ comorbidities constitute predictors of postoperative mortality. Comprehensive history taking, physical examination, and thorough review of laboratory and imaging examinations typically elucidate clinical evidence of hepatic dysfunction, portal hypertension, and/or their complications. Utilization of specific scoring systems (Child-Pugh and MELD) adds objectivity to stratifying the severity of hepatic dysfunction. Hypovolemia and coagulopathy often represent major preoperative concerns. Resuscitation mandates judicious use of intravenous fluids and blood products. As a general rule, the most expeditious and least invasive operative procedure should be planned. Laparoscopic approaches, advanced energy devices, mechanical staplers, and topical hemostatics should be considered whenever applicable to improve safety. Precise operative technique must acknowledge common distortions in hepatic anatomy, as well as the risk of massive hemorrhage from porto-systemic collaterals. Preventive measures, as well as both clinical and laboratory vigilance, for postoperative hepatic and renal decompensation are essential.

Umbilical Hernia with Evisceration. Two Cases and a Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Evisceration of umbilical hernias is an uncommon occurrence whereby the hernial contents break through the skin overlying the sac and skin. Irrespective of cause, sudden evisceration of an umbilical hernia is associated with deterioration and a poor outcome.

CASE REPORTS

Our first case was a 42-year-old woman who presented with sudden outpouring of fluid from the umbilicus with omental evisceration. Further evaluation revealed hepatic decompensation caused by hepatitis C infection belonging to Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C. After stabilizing her hemodynamically, she underwent a partial omentectomy with primary repair of umbilical defect. The patient's postoperative course was challenging. She died of septicemia and acute renal failure after 5 days. Our second case was a 40-year-old man who suffered from alcohol-induced cirrhosis, presenting with omental evisceration, belonging to Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C. We performed a primary repair of the hernial defect with peritoneovenous shunting for his intractable ascites. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed grade I esophageal varices. The patient succumbed to acute variceal hemorrhage with acute renal failure 18 days later. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: In an emergent setting with multiple factors influencing final surgical outcome, it is imperative that management be tailored for each patient. Those with severe encephalopathy or cardiovascular instability must be stabilized before surgical intervention. Central venous and blood pressures need to be closely monitored during resuscitation, as fervent fluid administration may predispose to variceal hemorrhage. It may be prudent to follow the principle of hypotensive resuscitation as in acute trauma cases.

Umbilical hernia in patients with liver cirrhosis: A surgical challenge

Umbilical hernia occurs in 20% of the patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with ascites. Due to the enormous intraabdominal pressure secondary to the ascites, umbilical hernia in these patients has a tendency to enlarge rapidly and to complicate. The treatment of umbilical hernia in these patients is a surgical challenge. Ascites control is the mainstay to reduce hernia recurrence and postoperative complications, such as wound infection, evisceration, ascites drainage, and peritonitis. Intermittent paracentesis, temporary peritoneal dialysis catheter or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may be necessary to control ascites. Hernia repair is indicated in patients in whom medical treatment is effective in controlling ascites. Patients who have a good perspective to be transplanted within 3-6 mo, herniorrhaphy should be performed during transplantation. Hernia repair with mesh is associated with lower recurrence rate, but with higher surgical site infection when compared to hernia correction with conventional fascial suture. There is no consensus on the best abdominal wall layer in which the mesh should be placed: Onlay, sublay, or underlay. Many studies have demonstrated several advantages of the laparoscopic umbilical herniorrhaphy in cirrhotic patients compared with open surgical treatment.

Outcomes of abdominal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis

Patients suffering from liver cirrhosis (LC) frequently require non-hepatic abdominal surgery, even before liver transplantation. LC is an important risk factor itself for surgery, due to the higher than average associated morbidity and mortality. This high surgical risk occurs because of the pathophysiology of liver disease itself and to the presence of contributing factors, such as coagulopathy, poor nutritional status, adaptive immune dysfunction, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and renal and pulmonary dysfunction, which all lead to poor outcomes. Careful evaluation of these factors and the degree of liver disease can help to reduce the development of complications both during and after abdominal surgery. In the emergency setting, with the presence of decompensated LC, alcoholic hepatitis, severe/advanced LC, and significant extrahepatic organ dysfunction conservative management is preferred. A multidisciplinary, individualized, and specialized approach can improve outcomes; preoperative optimization after risk stratification and careful management are mandatory before surgery. Laparoscopic techniques can also improve outcomes. We review the impact of LC on surgical outcome in non-hepatic abdominal surgeries required in this cirrhotic population before, during, and after surgery.

The repair of umbilical hernia in cirrhotic patients: 18 consecutive case series in a single institute

Purpose

Traditionally, the surgical repair of umbilical hernia in cirrhotic patients with ascites is avoided because of a significant recurrence rate and perioperative morbidity/mortality. However, recent reports recommend early elective surgery in these patients because surgery-related complications can be reduced with minimally invasive surgery and development of perioperative patient care. The current study was conducted to analyze safety and feasibility of umbilical hernia repairs performed in a single institute.

Methods

A single center retrospective analysis of patients' data was conducted. Eighteen patients with umbilical hernia accompanied by liver cirrhosis underwent hernia repair in the period between 2005 and 2012. The charts of these patients were reviewed and demographic data, postoperative complications, and recurrence were recorded.

Results

Eleven males and seven females with a mean age of 62.9 years were analyzed. Two of the patients were classified as Child's class A, 11 as Child's class B, and five as Child's class C. Four patients underwent emergency surgery because of perforations in the hernia sac in two cases and incarcerated hernias in the other two cases. Of the 18 patients who underwent surgery, four (22%) experienced a recurrence, three (17%) developed edema at the surgical sites, one (5%) experienced hepatic coma, and one (5%) showed postoperative variceal hemorrhage. All of these events occurred after emergency surgery.

Conclusion

In contrast to traditional concepts, early and elective repair of umbilical hernia can be performed easily and safely in cirrhotic patients.

Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected]

BACKGROUND

The Executive board of the Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery (SICE) promoted an update of the first evidence-based Italian Consensus Conference Guidelines 2010 because a large amount of literature has been published in the last 4 years about the topics examined and new relevant issues.

METHODS

The scientific committee selected the topics to be addressed: indications to surgical treatment including special conditions (obesity, cirrhosis, diastasis recti abdominis, acute presentation); safety and outcome of intraperitoneal meshes (synthetic and biologic); fixing devices (absorbable/non-absorbable); abdominal border and parastomal hernia; intraoperative and perioperative complications; and recurrent ventral/incisional hernia. All the recommendations are the result of a careful and complete literature review examined with autonomous judgment by the entire panel. The process was supervised by experts in methodology and epidemiology from the most qualified Italian institution. Two external reviewers were designed by the EAES and EHS to guarantee the most objective, transparent, and reliable work. The Oxford hierarchy (OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. "The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence") was used by the panel to grade clinical outcomes according to levels of evidence. The recommendations were based on the grading system suggested by the GRADE working group.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The availability of recent level 1 evidence (a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs) allowed to recommend that not only laparoscopic repair is an acceptable alternative to the open repair, but also it is advantageous in terms of shorter hospital stay and wound infection rate. This conclusion appears to be extremely relevant in a clinical setting. Indications about specific conditions could also be issued: laparoscopy is recommended for the treatment of recurrent ventral hernias and obese patients, while it is a potential option for compensated cirrhotic and childbearing-age female patients. Many relevant and controversial topics were thoroughly examined by this consensus conference for the first time. Among them are the issue of safety of the intraperitoneal mesh placement, traditionally considered a major drawback of the laparoscopic technique, the role for the biologic meshes, and various aspects of the laparoscopic approach for particular locations of the defect such as the abdominal border or parastomal hernias.

Prior to the oral therapy, what do we know about HCV-4 in Egypt: a randomized survey of prevalence and risks using data mining computed analysis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects over 180 million people worldwide and it's the leading cause of chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV is classified into seven major genotypes and a series of subtypes. In general, HCV genotype 4 (HCV-4) is common in the Middle East and Africa, where it is responsible for more than 80% of HCV infections. Although HCV-4 is the cause of approximately 20% of the 180 million cases of chronic hepatitis C worldwide, it has not been a major subject of research yet. The aim of the current study is to survey the morbidities and disease complications among Egyptian population infected with HCV-4 using data mining advanced computing methods mainly and other complementary statistical analysis. Six thousand six hundred sixty subjects, aged between 17 and 58 years old, from different Egyptian Governorates were screened for HCV infection by ELISA and qualitative PCR. HCV-positive patients were further investigated for the incidence of liver cirrhosis and esophageal varices. Obtained data were analyzed by data mining approach. Among 6660 subjects enrolled in this survey, 1018 patients (15.28%) were HCV-positive. Proportion of infected-males was significantly higher than females; 61.6% versus 38.4% (P=0.0052). Around two-third of infected-patients (635/1018; 62.4%) were presented with liver cirrhosis. Additionally, approximately half of the cirrhotic patients (301/635; 47.4%) showed degrees of large esophageal varices (LEVs), with higher variceal grade observed in males. Age for esophageal variceal development was 47±1. Data mining analysis yielded esophageal wall thickness (>6.5 mm), determined by conventional U/S, as the only independent predictor for esophageal varices. This study emphasizes the high prevalence of HCV infection among Egyptian population, in particular among males. Egyptians with HCV-4 infection are at a higher risk to develop cirrhotic liver and esophageal varices. Data mining, a new analytic technique in medical field, shed light in this study on the clinical importance of esophageal wall thickness as a useful predictor for risky esophageal varices using decision tree algorithm.

Management of umbilical hernias in patients with ascites: development of a nomogram to predict mortality

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to develop an easy-to-use nomogram to assist clinicians in predicting patient-specific mortality in this patient population.

METHODS

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use files were used from 2005 to 2011. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model 30-day postoperative mortality in patients with ascites who underwent umbilical hernia repair.

RESULTS

A total of 688 patients with ascites undergoing umbilical hernia repair were included. There were 643 (94%) survivors and 45 (7%) mortalities. A total of 300 (44%) patients were classified as emergent cases. Using logistic regression to predict 30-day mortality, preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, albumin, white blood cell count, and platelet count were found to be significant predictors (P < .05) of mortality and were included in our model.

CONCLUSION

We propose a nomogram to enable clinicians to better estimate mortality in patients with ascites undergoing umbilical hernia repair.

Emergency hernia repair in cirrhotic patients with ascites

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for abdominal wall hernias in the setting of ascites is not clear. We describe our experience with emergent surgery for hernias in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and assess variables associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes to inform decisions about aggressive early repair.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all emergency abdominal wall hernia repairs admitted from the emergency department from January 2000 to December 2011 in all patients with ascites caused by liver cirrhosis. Demographic data, comorbidities, complications, operative details, hospital length of stay, and admission model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was determined. Follow-up was detailed via comprehensive liver service electronic records.

RESULTS

There were 69 emergent hernia surgeries in 68 patients during the study period. There were two early deaths (both MELD score> 20). Multivariate analysis revealed MELD score (18% increase in risk with each point of MELD), preoperative anemia (sevenfold increase in risk), and preoperative small bowel obstruction (ninefold increase in risk) as predictive factors of major complication. In patients with MELD score greater than 10, morbidity was more than 50%, and major morbidity is greater than 12% when MELD score is greater than 20.

CONCLUSION

Emergent hernia surgery in patients with ascites has low mortality but high morbidity and requires intense use of resources. To decrease the incidence of emergent hernia surgery, we recommend the aggressive use of elective repair. Emergent hernia repair, when necessary, should be performed at experienced centers and must include adequate ascites control with diuretic therapy and percutaneous paracentesis. Preoperative anemia and electrolyte abnormalities should be aggressively treated. Finally, while wound complications are common and frequently require reintervention, they are not associated with increased mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level V.

Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: evidence-based guidelines of the first Italian Consensus Conference

PURPOSE

The laparoscopic treatment of ventral incisional hernias is the object of constant attention and is becoming increasingly widespread in the international scientific-surgical community; however, there is ample debate on its technical details and indications. In order to establish a common approach on laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair, the first Italian Consensus Conference was organized in Naples (Italy) on 14-15 January 2010.

METHODS

The format of the Consensus Conference was freely adapted from the standards of the National Institute of Health and the Italian Health Institute. The parties involved included the followings: a Promotional Committee, a Scientific Committee, a group of Experts, the Jury Panel and a Scientific Secretariat.

RESULTS

Eleven statements, regarding three large chapters on the indications, the technical details and the management of complications were drafted on the basis of literature references collected by the Scientific Committee, documents developed by the Experts, reports presented and discussed during the Consensus Conference, and discussion among the members of the Jury.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach is safe and effective for defects larger than 3 cm in diameter; old age, obesity, previous abdominal operations, recurrence and strangulation are not absolute contraindications. Ensuring an adequate overlap, careful adhesiolysis and correct fixing of the prosthesis are among the technical details recommended. Complications and recurrences are comparable to, and in some cases, less numerous than with the open approach.

Umbilical hernias and cirrhose

Umbilical hernia (UH) is the most frequent abdominal wall complication of ascites in cirrhotic patients. Treatment to control ascites, which mainly consists of repeated paracentesis or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), is mandatory; otherwise the risk of hernia recurrence is very high. Nowadays, surgical portosystemic shunts are rarely performed. Classically, hernia repair was offered only to patients with symptomatic UH, but presently, even if the hernia is minimally symptomatic, there is tendency to perform elective repair to avoid emergency surgery for complications associated with very high mortality and morbidity rates (rupture and strangulation). If liver transplantation is indicated, treatment of UH can be performed simultaneously, unless the hernia is highly symptomatic or complicated or if the waiting time on the transplantation list is long. During repair, necrotic skin tissue should be excised; the use of prosthetic material (if the defect is large) is possible with a low risk of infection as long as ascites is sterile. The advantage of laparoscopic repair of large UH is to avoid any skin incision (precluding ascitic fluid leak) and avoid exposing prosthetic mesh to necrotic infected tissue. If the defect is small, UH repair can be performed under local anesthesia.

Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair in the presence of extensive paraumbilical collateral veins: a case report

A patient with an umbilical hernia presenting with collateral veins in the abdominal wall and umbilicus is a case that every hernia surgeon has to deal with occasionally. Several underlying diseases have been described to provoke collateral veins in the abdominal wall. However, the treatment strategy should be uniform. We herein report a case of a successful laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair in a patient with collateral veins in the abdominal wall and umbilicus. A 63-year-old man was referred to the surgical outpatient clinic with a large symptomatic umbilical hernia and collateral veins in the abdominal wall, secondary to an occlusion of both common iliac veins. Because of collateral veins in the umbilicus and the size of the hernial defect, he was offered laparoscopic hernia repair without compromising these veins. Because of the extensive abdominal wall collaterals, duplex sonography vein mapping was performed preoperatively to mark a safe collateral-free area for trocar introduction. The defect was repaired by mesh prosthesis.

Management of umbilical hernia complicated with liver cirrhosis: an advocate of early and elective herniorrhaphy

BACKGROUND

Patients with umbilical hernias complicated by liver cirrhosis have an increased likelihood of complications following herniorrhaphy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with umbilical hernias complicated by liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2010, 44 patients were enrolled in this study. The comparison between non-operative and operative group was performed. Patients who underwent emergency versus elective surgery were also compared.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients, there were 33 men and 11 women. Thirty-one patients (70.5%) underwent surgery and 13 patients (29.5%) were treated conservatively. Overall morbidity and mortality rates following herniorrhaphy were 42% and 6.5%. The mean albumin level was significantly lower and total bilirubin, creatinine and mean model of end-stage liver disease score were significantly higher in non-operative group than in operative group. Combined resection was performed more frequently in the emergency group than in elective group. A significantly higher proportion of patients in emergency operation group had postoperative complications (P=0.01), especially ascites (P=0.02). The operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the elective operation group than in emergency operation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early, elective repair of umbilical hernias in cirrhotic patients should be advocated considering the hepatic reserve and patient's condition. Ascites control is the mainstay of post-operative management.

Closure of ascites leaks with fibrin glue injection in patients with end-stage liver disease

BACKGROUND

Ascites leaks (AL) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality regardless if they are medically or surgically managed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a pilot study, 14 ESLD patients with AL underwent treatment with fibrin glue injection around the leak after failing conservative therapy. The end point of this study was the cessation of AL in the short term and the maintenance of a leak-free abdomen in the long term, allowing for medical optimization of the patients.

RESULTS

Median age of the 10 men and 4 women was 50 (range 26-67) years. Underlying ESLDs were chronic hepatitis C (n=5), alcoholic LD (n=2), cryptogenic cirrhosis (n=2), and miscellaneous (n=5). There were six leaking incisions posthernia repair (three umbilical and three inguinal), two leaking/ruptured umbilical hernias, four leaking paracentesis sites, one leaking Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain canal, and one leaking laparoscopic trocar site. Average AL volume per day was 1000 (range 400-2000) mL. All leaks were immediately resolved with a 3-5 mL fibrin glue injection. Five recurred and required a second injection (four within 24 hours). Mental status improved in 7 patients (West Haven Criteria: grade II to I [n=6], grade III to I [n=1]). Median model of end-stage liver disease scores improved from 23 (range 8-33) to 20 (range 14-26). There were no infections, bleeds, or other injection-related complications. Average follow-up for these patients was 441.6 days (range 2-852). Five patients underwent liver transplant (LT) median 15 (range 4-270) days postinjection; 2 of them died. Another 3 patients died (2 from sepsis and 1 from metastatic cancer).

CONCLUSION

Fibrin glue injection for the control of AL is a simple and safe bedside procedure that quickly controls AL, allowing for patient recovery in anticipation of further care.

Surgical repair of umbilical hernias in cirrhosis with ascites

The most common complications of umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis and ascites include leakage, ulceration, rupture and incarceration. If such a complication is present, there is a high mortality rate after surgical repair. Elective repair is the most effective choice, as it prevents complications with a lower mortality. However, the control of ascites before and/or after repair is mandatory but may not always be possible with diuretics and paracentesis. Portal decompression by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with better control of ascites may allow these patients to undergo surgery. Patients with cirrhosis and umbilical hernias should be referred for consideration of an elective surgical repair with mesh, preferably after optimal management of ascites. There should be a low threshold for placement of a TIPS to facilitate surgery and reduce the chance of severe recurrence of ascites. If surgery is contraindicated, a TIPS must be considered for control of ascites.

Single-port laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic umbilical herniorrhaphy is preferred when abdominal wall defects exceed 3 cm. The authors describe a novel single-port laparoscopic technique for umbilical hernia repair.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair. A 10-mm endoscope with a working channel was placed in the left upper quadrant. The abdominal wall defect was covered with a circular mesh with pretied sutures and needles attached. The mesh was secured to the abdominal wall with intraabdominal sutures without the need for transfascial suture fixation.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 43 years, and the average BMI was 34 kg/m(2). All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 73 minutes. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is a safe and easily reproducible novel technique. It can help reduce possible complications from multiple-port sites.

Factors that predict outcome of abdominal operations in patients with advanced cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis have an increased risk of complications during surgery that is relative to the severity of liver disease; it is a challenge to determine which patients are the best candidates for surgery. We performed a hospital-based study to identify factors that might facilitate selection of operative candidates and guide their management.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 100 cirrhotic patients (50 classified as Child-Turcotte-Pugh [CTP] A, 33 as CTP B, and 17 as CTP C) who underwent abdominal surgery at an institution specializing in liver medicine and transplant from 2002-2008. Significant univariate variables were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors that correlate with outcome.

RESULTS

The overall, 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 7%. The mortality for patients who were CTP A was 2%, CTP B was 12%, and CTP C was 12%; 33 patients had a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >or=15, with 29% mortality. On the basis of multivariate analyses, risk factors for adverse outcome were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3; procedures being emergent; intraoperative blood transfusion; intraoperative blood loss >150 mL; presence of ascites; total bilirubin level >1.5 mg/dL; and albumin level <3 mg/dL. Addition of serum albumin to MELD score showed that patients with MELD score >or=15 and albumin <or=2.5 mg/dL (vs >2.5 mg/dL) had significantly increased mortality (60% vs 14%, P < .01) and independently increased probability of adverse outcome (odds ratio, 8.4; P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with MELD scores >or=15, the preoperative albumin level correlates with outcome and could guide operative decisions. Intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusion correlates with adverse outcome and should be limited.

Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: feasibility, safety, and results

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of cancer and the need for several surgical treatments are the Achilles' heel of the treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cases of cirrhosis. The difficulty of reintervention is increased by the formation of adhesions after the previous hepatectomy that can make a new surgical procedure more difficult and less safe. With a minimally invasive approach, the formation of postoperative adhesions seems to be minimized, and the adhesiolysis procedure seems to be faster and safer in terms of blood loss and risk of visceral injuries.

METHODS

This report describes a series of 15 patients submitted to a laparoscopic reintervention (hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation) for a recurrence of HCC after a previous open (group 1) or laparoscopic (group 2) procedure for a primary tumor. It aims to explain the feasibility, safety, and results of repeated laparoscopic liver surgery.

RESULTS

The rates for overall postoperative mortality and morbidity were respectively 0% and 26.6% (4/15). No patients had a severe postoperative complication. Only one patient in group 2 presented with moderate ascites postoperatively, whereas two patients in group 1 reported atelectasis requiring physiotherapy and one experienced pneumonia, which was treated with antibiotics. In this series, the findings indicated that patients submitted first to an open hepatic resection (group 1) experience more intraabdominal adhesions. Moreover, in group 1, hypervascularized adhesions typical of cirrhotic patients were several and thicker, with a major potential risk of bleeding and bowel injuries at the time of reintervention. Although for group 2 the length of the intervention was shorter, for group 1, the operating times and safety in terms of bowel injuries were acceptable, demonstrating the feasibility of iterative laparoscopic surgery also for cirrhotic patients previously treated by the open surgical approach. The operative time for the second surgical procedure was shorter and the adhesiolysis easier for the patients previously treated with the laparoscopic approach (group 2). This underscores the advantages of the minimally invasive approach for managing the long oncologic history of cirrhotic patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent HCC in cirrhotic patients is a safe and feasible procedure with good short-term outcomes, but further prospective studies are needed to support these results.

Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation combined with laparoscopic liver resection for more than one HCC on cirrhosis

The management of patients affected by more than one hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial but nowadays a multimodal approach to this pathology seems to be the most effective and versatile therapeutic option. When orthotopic liver transplantation is not indicated, survival-time and quality of life improvement is the goal for patients who will have a long metabolic and oncologic disease history. Combined use of minimally invasive nonsurgical treatments [percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, transcutaneous arterial chemioembolization (TACE)] allows to offer to the patients the advantages of each therapeutic procedure reducing their individual side effects and complications. We consider laparoscopy as a minimally invasive procedure, which can offer the benefits of surgical treatment, by tumor removing, but with an improved postoperative course. If recurrence risk factors are present, the costs/benefits rapport can be decreased by the laparoscopic approach which offers, in addition to a radical resection, a decreased postoperative pain, reduced trauma to the abdominal wall, smaller incisions, reduced peritoneal adhesions and, in selected cases, an earlier beginning of chemiotherapy. We report the case of a patient affected by more than one HCC with a bigger lesion of 50 mm protruding from hepatic segment III, one subcapsular lesion located at segment V, and one deep lesion located at segment VII-VIII. The patient was submitted to a double laparoscopic liver resection in association with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation. Five months later, the patient presented an early recurrence of malignancy that was treated by TACE. At 8 months from the treatment, the patient presented another multifocal recurrence and was submitted to another TACE. At 2 years from the laparoscopic procedure, the patient is in apparent good conditions with an acceptable quality of life. We think that laparoscopic resection could gain a considerable place in the multimodal treatment of cirrhotic liver with more than one HCC because, by tumor removing, it offers the benefits of surgical treatment with a lower complications rate.