Trends in Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Role of Thiazolidinediones

Differences in hypoglycemia event rates and associated cost-consequence in patients initiated on long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin products

OBJECTIVE

To compare hypoglycemia event rates in patients initiated on long-acting insulin analog (glargine) or intermediate-acting insulin (NPH) and to analyze the associated cost-consequence from a managed care perspective.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of pharmacy and medical claims and electronic laboratory result data using a southeastern United States managed care health plan.

METHODS

Patients newly initiated on glargine or NPH between July 1, 2000 and August 31, 2002 were included. Hypoglycemia events were identified from medical claims by their ICD-9CM codes. Multivariable techniques were used to compare hypoglycemia event rates between cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1434 patients were eligible (glargine = 310, NPH = 1124). The mean age was 53 years +/- 17 years and 51% of patients were male. The mean treatment duration was 8.6 months +/- 4.5 months. Multivariate analyses showed that patients in the NPH group had a higher hypoglycemia event rate than the glargine group (18.3 versus 7.3 per 100 patients per year; p = 0.009). The number needed to treat (glargine versus NPH) to avoid one hypoglycemia event per patient per year was nine patients at an A1C of 7%. The mean annual index medication cost was $47 more for glargine ($390) than for NPH ($343) per patient per year (p = 0.042). The mean cost per hypoglycemia event was $1087 (95% CI: $764-$1409).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with glargine had significantly lower hypoglycemia event rates compared to the NPH group. The risk difference indicated that one hypoglycemia event would be avoided for every nine patients treated with glargine instead of NPH. The cost increase associated with treating nine patients with glargine rather than NPH is less than the cost of treating one hypoglycemia event. In this population, the savings associated with reduced hypoglycemic events more than offset the increased acquisition cost associated with glargine.

Approach to the management of diabetic patients with heart failure: role of thiazolidinediones

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic, progressive disease that results in microvascular and macrovascular complications. Patients with diabetes are at high risk for developing heart failure, and the prevalence of diabetes in patients with heart failure ranges from 24% to 44%, with an estimated 1 to 2 million individuals in the United States having both diabetes and heart failure. Patients with diabetes and heart failure are at increased risk for mortality. Primary treatment goals in diabetes include restoration and maintenance of normoglycemia, avoidance of diabetic complications, and prevention of cardiovascular events. The range of therapeutic options for glycemic control has been extended with the introduction of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) used as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic medications or insulin. TZDs decrease plasma insulin levels, improve endothelial function, decrease vascular inflammation, and decrease C-reactive protein levels, effects that are potentially beneficial in patients with heart failure. Weight gain and peripheral edema are recognized side effects of these drugs, particularly when used in combination with insulin. Although health care providers should be aware of the potential risk of worsened heart failure when TZDs are used in patients with diabetes and heart failure, these agents may be considered for use in patients with New York Heart Association class I and II heart failure when appropriate monitoring can be provided. Prospective clinical trials are currently under way to further define the cardiovascular safety and efficacy of TZDs in diabetic patients with heart failure.