Factors determining length of hospitalization for patients having laminectomy surgery

Preoperative Cognitive Impairment as a Predictor of Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Disease

Cognitive status has been reported to affect the peri-operative and post-operative outcomes of certain surgical procedures. This prospective study investigated the effect of preoperative cognitive impairment on the postoperative course of elderly patients (n = 122, >65 years), following spine surgery for degenerative spinal disease. Data on demographic characteristics, medical history, and blood analysis results were collected. Preoperative cognition was assessed using the mini-mental state examination, and patients were divided into three groups: normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. Discharge destinations (p = 0.014) and postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (p = 0.037) significantly differed based on the cognitive status. Operation time (p = 0.049), white blood cell count (p = 0.022), platelet count (p = 0.013), the mini-mental state examination score (p = 0.033), and the Beck Depression Inventory score (p = 0.041) were significantly associated with the length of hospital stay. Our investigation demonstrated that improved understanding of preoperative cognitive status may be helpful in surgical decision-making and postoperative care of elderly patients with degenerative spinal disease.

Revision Surgery after Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy Compared with Primary Open Surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcome of reoperation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) as compared with primary spinal decompression and fusion.

Methods

A retrospective study from December 2014 to December 2017 was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital and comprised 39 patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease (LDD): 13 post‐PELD who underwent reoperation (revision surgery group) and 26 who received primary spinal decompression and fusion (primary open surgery group). The two groups were compared regarding: operative time, blood loss, transfusion, hospitalization, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) improvement rate, and postoperative complications. The Mann–Whitney U‐test was applied to analyze continuous parameters, and the χ²‐test for categorical parameters. Fisher's exact test was used for small data subsets.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in mean age (52.7 years vs 52.9 years), gender ratio (6 men‐to‐7 women vs 12 men‐to‐14 women), body mass index, medical history, preoperative diagnosis, or surgical spine level (P > 0.05). The mean operative time of the revision surgery group was significantly longer than that of the primary open surgery group (160.0 min vs 130.2 min, P < 0.05). The revision surgery group also had a significantly higher mean estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage, and length of hospital stay (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of hemoglobin and hematocrit values, preoperatively and postoperatively. The rate of transitional neurological irritation was higher in the revision surgery group (61.5% vs 3.8%; P < 0.05), as was intraoperative durotomy and cerebrospinal fluid leakage (30.8% vs 3.8%, P < 0.05). At 1 month, the VAS and ODI scores of the primary open surgery group were significantly better than those of the revision surgery group, while the improvement in JOA scores was similar. After 6 and 12 months’ follow‐up, the VAS and ODI scores and the rates of JOA improvement were comparable.

Conclusion

Patients with LDD who received primary spinal decompression and fusion experienced lower rates of perioperative complications and shorter hospitalization compared with patients who underwent revision surgery after PELD, but the clinical outcomes at the last follow‐up of both groups were satisfactory.

Structural equation model analysis of the length-of-hospital stay after lumbar spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Length-of-hospital stay (LOS) after lumbar spine surgery (LSS) can be affected by many factors. However, few studies have evaluated predictors of LOS, and all have used limited number of variables as predictors.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to identify presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical predictors of LOS after LSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of consecutive patients who had LSS at the University of Kansas Hospital from October 2008 to April, 2012.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Five hundred ninety-three patients underwent LSS consisting of laminotomy, laminectomy, or arthrodesis.

DEPENDENT VARIABLE

LOS. Multiple presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical variables were extracted from the patients' medical records and considered as possible predictors (independent variables) of LOS.

METHODS

Potential predictors that were significantly correlated with LOS were used as indicators to construct three latent factors presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical, which were in turn used to predict LOS in a structural equation model.

RESULTS

The average LOS was 4.01±2.73 days. The presurgical factor was indicated by age (61.97±14.49 years), previous level of function (60.5% were totally independent), previous hemoglobin level (13.70±1.36 mg/dL), and use of assistive devices (60% were assistive device users). The surgical factor was indicated by severity of illness (50.2% had minor disease severity), presence of complications (1.9%), and stay in an intensive care unit (4.0%). The postsurgical factor was indicated by postsurgical walking distance (166.43±175.75 ft), level of assistance during walking (5.18±0.81 out of 7 points), balance scores (6.18±1.82 out of 10 points), and bed mobility and transfer dependency scores (9.81±1.99 out of 14 points). These three latent factors explained 47% of variation in LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Postsurgical factors predicted the highest variation in LOS in comparison with presurgical and surgical factors and should be taken into consideration for discharge planning. Postsurgical factors are related to the patient's function, modifiable with rehabilitation, and can be improved to shorten LOS. Inclusion of more reliable and standardized presurgical variables could improve the predictability of the model.

Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was conducted for 112 patients who underwent revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior lumbar spine decompression and fusion with segmental instrumentation is a common procedure in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Many patients undergoing this procedure have had previous lumbar spine surgery, yet little is known about the factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion.

METHODS

The charts of 112 patients (53 men and 59 women) with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent revision surgery from March 1992 to June 1999 were reviewed. Their average age was 54 years (range, 27-84 years). All the surgeries included decompression and fusion with segmental instrumentation. The patients' demographics, comorbid conditions, factors related to previous lumbar spine surgery, diagnosis, number of levels fused, and preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit were collected and used as the independent variables. Multiple regression analysis was used to ascertain factors predicting length of hospital stay, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion.

RESULTS

The mean length of hospital stay was 6 +/- 2.4 days, the operative time 280 +/- 62 minutes, the estimated intraoperative blood loss 1073 +/- 716 mL, and the total volume of blood transfused 1.04 +/- 1.17 U. For 63% of the patients, a blood transfusion was needed. Increasing age was the significant predictor for hospital stay (P < 0.001). The factors predicting operative time were number of levels fused (P < 0.001), diagnosis of degenerative scoliosis (P < 0.05), and excessive body weight (P < 0.01). The factors predicting intraoperative blood loss were number of levels fused (P < 0.01), body weight (P < 0.001), and high preoperative hemoglobin (P < 0.001). Both logistic and linear regression analysis showed that the factors predicting blood transfusion were number of levels fused (P < 0.01), age (P < 0.05), and low preoperative hemoglobin (P < 0.001). Other factors associated with hospital stay and blood transfusion were unemployment associated with three or more comorbid conditions and complications. The women had less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01), but received more transfused blood than the men (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Number of levels fused and age seem to be the most significant factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation.

Predicting length of hospital stay and cost by aneurysm grade on admission

To determine the relationship between clinical grade on admission and treatment cost after aneurysm rupture, the authors retrospectively examined the length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospitalization costs (excluding professional fees) for 543 patients admitted for aneurysm surgery between 1983 and 1993. The overall median LOS was 18 days, with a range of 1 to 165 days. Increased median LOS correlated with Hunt and Hess Grades 0 to IV on admission (p < 0.001). Median LOS for Grade V patients was reduced, in part, because of early mortality. Increased treatment cost also correlated with worse admission clinical grade (p < 0.001). A significant proportion of total expenditures occurred early in the hospitalization for patients in all clinical grades. Identification of additional factors affecting the cost of aneurysm treatment is indicated to complement treatment outcome studies.

Hospital payment source and length-of-stay

The primary aim of the research reported here is to examine elements of the theory of social organizations as adaptive systems as derived from Roy's model by investigating the ability of hospital payment source to predict length-of-stay. A retrospective review was conducted of 3,297 records of patients discharged under 1 of 10 frequently occurring diagnosis-related-groups. Two groups were formed to isolate the contextual stimuli-patients whose hospital care was paid for under a diagnosis-related-group payment system and patients whose hospital care was paid for under a per diem payment system. The Tilton 0 statistic indicated a high degree of similarity between the two patient groups. Thus, length-of-stay could not be effectively predicted based on the source of payment to the hospital.