The Evolution of the Clinician-Educator in the United States and Canada: Personal Reflections Over the Last 45 Years

Teaching excellence, the hidden curriculum and complexity: an international comparative case study of two medical schools

The perception held by clinical teachers of health professionals that their teaching efforts are under-valued by their education institutions persists despite intensive research and subsequent interventions to address this global problem. The purpose of this multi-site study is to examine how clinical teaching activities are organised, in order to reveal if there are underlying systemic factors that may contribute to this wicked problem. This study employed a cross-comparative case study design of one Singaporean and one Canadian medical school. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with organisational leaders (n = 23) who manage clinical teaching activities and/or have insights on their local assessment, support and recognition systems. Public records were also collected from each site (n = 24). A theory-driven content analysis using a complexity science interpretation of the concept of the Hidden Curriculum was conducted with both sets of data. The two sites were at different stages of maturation in respect of clinical teaching evaluation and feedback, support, and recognition and reward systems. Despite this, the interviews identified shared structure, process and culture-oriented challenges: low prioritisation of teaching, faculty demotivation and dissatisfaction across both research sites. Our findings suggest that a continued focus on structure and process-oriented reforms to elicit change is insufficient. Instead, further examination of site-specific, multiple intersecting academic and clinical cultures is needed. Future efforts to improve the value and drive the pursuit of teaching excellence will require multi-faceted structure, process and culture change approaches. We argue that Hafferty and Castellani's (The hidden curriculum: A theory of medical education, Routledge, 2009) re-conceptualisation of hidden curriculum through a complexity science lens should be used as a heuristic device to address future research and reform in local medical education contexts.

Prioritising Competencies in Clinician Educator Training in Residency Programmes

INTRODUCTION

Although Clinician Educator Tracks (CETs) have been developed for postgraduate trainees, more clarity is needed regarding which competencies are most relevant to resident and fellow physicians (housestaff) seeking to become Clinician Educators (CEs).

METHODS

We used the Clinician Educator Milestones, an established framework for competencies at the faculty level, to perform a targeted needs assessment at a large academic institution from April-May 2023. Educational leaders in undergraduate (UME), graduate (GME) and senior medical education (SME) leadership roles were asked to prioritise the Clinician Educator Milestones subcompetencies for a 1-year track. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed; text comments underwent content analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 285 leaders, 118 (41%) completed the survey. The average length in educational leadership was 6.9 ± 5.6 years, with 33% having formal education training, 23% representing surgical specialities and 17% in SME roles. The subcompetencies of learner assessment and feedback were prioritised highest (86%), while change management was prioritised lowest (23%). Respondents in SME roles compared to UME and GME roles or those in educational leadership ≥ 6 years compared to < 6 years prioritised professionalism. Respondents without formal education training prioritised medical education scholarship more often than those with training. Surgical respondents more often prioritised administrative skills than nonsurgical respondents. Open-ended comments were generally positive towards a CET for housestaff, suggesting a hybrid format with flexible scheduling.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching-oriented subcompetencies were highly prioritised for a CET targeted at housestaff. The prioritisation choices offer guidance for a CE's progression through the subcompetencies.

Education Research: The Current Landscape of Clinician Educator Tracks in Adult Neurology Residency Programs: A National Survey of Program Directors

Background and Objectives

As the concept of a clinician-educator (CE) evolves and the multiple competencies of the role become better defined, there seems to be a growing need for targeted training for clinicians pursuing a career in medical education. This study aims to describe the current state of CE tracks in adult neurology residency programs and to identify the barriers to implementation, potential solutions, and program goals and outcomes.

Methods

We characterized CE tracks using 2 methods. First, we reviewed the websites of all US adult neurology residency programs to determine the availability of a CE track and its characteristics. Second, we administered a 20-item survey to program directors (PDs) of all US neurology residency programs, with questions focused on track availability, characteristics, perceived benefits of CE tracks on resident career development, barriers to implementation, and ideas for national initiatives that may facilitate track development or improvement.

Results

Fifty-eight of 177 (33%) PDs responded to the survey. Combining the results of the website reviews and surveys, we found that 34 of 179 (19%) programs have CE tracks. Seventy percent of PDs felt that CE tracks are very impactful or impactful for participating residents' careers, a perception more common among PDs of programs with tracks. The greatest perceived benefit was in preparing residents for educational leadership roles. The greatest barriers to implementation were a lack of teaching faculty, a lack of resources, and limited resident time. The highest ranked idea for a national initiative that can facilitate track development was live and recorded lectures on medical education topics.

Discussion

Although most PDs surveyed agreed that CE tracks are impactful for preparing residents as teachers and education leaders, such tracks are available in only 19% of adult neurology residency programs. PDs report that the benefits of CE tracks extend beyond the participants, with implications for the health of the residency program and the neurology department. While some programs have significant barriers to implementation, national initiatives may help reduce the resource burden on individual programs. Future areas of study include assessing the development and outcomes of national initiatives and analyzing the outcomes associated with CE tracks.

Faculty as Teachers: Career Development for the Clinician-Educator

Clinician-Educators are the primary faculty in academic anesthesiology departments. These individuals assist with the departmental mission of clinical care and of education. Despite the critical role of the clinician-educator, academic advancement for these individuals has been difficult with the criteria for promotion continuing to evolve. The problem lies in the documentation of clinical and educational excellence in a means that a promotion committee may understand. Faculty development and advanced degrees in education have been helpful with the success of programs remaining unclear.

Clinician Educator Milestones: Assessing and Improving Educators' Skills

ABSTRACT

The importance of the clinician educator (CE) role in delivery of competency-based medical education is well recognized. There is, however, no formal mechanism to identify when faculty have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be successful CEs. In 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine convened a workgroup of 18 individuals representing multiple medical specialties and diverse institutions in the United States, including nonphysician educators, a medical student, and a resident, to develop a set of competencies, subcompetencies, and milestones for CEs.A 5-step process was used to create the Clinician Educator Milestones (CEMs). In step 1, the workgroup developed an initial CEM draft. Through brainstorming, 141 potential education-related CE tasks were identified. Descriptive statements for each competency and developmental trajectories for each subcompetency were developed and confirmed by consensus. The workgroup then created a supplemental guide, assessment tools, and additional resources. In step 2, a diverse group of CEs were surveyed in 2021 and provided feedback on the CEMs. In step 3, this feedback was used by the workgroup to refine the CEMs. In step 4, the second draft of the CEMs was submitted for public comment, and the CEMs were finalized. In step 5, final CEMs were released for public use in 2022.The CEMs consist of 1 foundational domain that focuses on commitment to lifelong learning, 4 additional domains of competence for CEs in the learning environment, and 20 subcompetencies. These milestones have many potential uses for CEs, including self-assessment, constructing learning and improvement plans, and designing systematic faculty development efforts. The CEMs will continue to evolve as they are applied in practice and as the role of CEs continues to grow and develop.

Becoming a Cardiothoracic Surgical Educator

Cardiothoracic training continues to evolve and is a completely different teaching environment than prior. Cardiothoracic surgical educators are tasked to ensure that all levels of learners are appropriately trained. To be an effective surgical educator, one must expand their skills beyond being content experts but also acquire knowledge of educational theory and formal training in how to teach effectively. Furthermore, applying a scholarly approach and engaging in scholarship differentiate a cardiothoracic surgical educator from a teacher. Therefore, the surgical educator academic track is different from a surgical scientist track in terms of skills, work performed, documentation, and promotion requirements.

"It's All About the Trust And Building A Foundation:" Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical Student Coaching Program

Coaching is increasingly implemented in medical education to support learners' growth, learning, and wellbeing. Data demonstrating the impact of longitudinal coaching programs are needed.

We developed and evaluated a comprehensive longitudinal medical student coaching program designed to achieve three aims for students: fostering personal and professional development, advancing physician skills with a growth mindset, and promoting student wellbeing and belonging within an inclusive learning community. We also sought to advance coaches' development as faculty through satisfying education roles with structured training. Students meet with coaches weekly for the first 17 months of medical school for patient care and health systems skills learning, and at least twice yearly throughout the remainder of medical school for individual progress and planning meetings and small-group discussions about professional identity. Using the developmental evaluation framework, we iteratively evaluated the program over the first five years of implementation with multiple quantitative and qualitative measures of students' and coaches' experiences related to the three aims.

The University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, developed a longitudinal coaching program in 2016 for medical students alongside reform of the four-year curriculum. The coaching program addressed unmet student needs for a longitudinal, non-evaluative relationship with a coach to support their development, shape their approach to learning, and promote belonging and community.

In surveys and focus groups, students reported high satisfaction with coaching in measures of the three program aims. They appreciated coaches' availability and guidance for the range of academic, personal, career, and other questions they had throughout medical school. Students endorsed the value of a longitudinal relationship and coaches' ability to meet their changing needs over time. Students rated coaches' teaching of foundational clinical skills highly. Students observed coaches learning some clinical skills with them - skills outside a coach's daily practice. Students also raised some concerns about variability among coaches. Attention to wellbeing and belonging to a learning community were program highlights for students. Coaches benefited from relationships with students and other coaches and welcomed the professional development to equip them to support all student needs.

Students perceive that a comprehensive medical student coaching program can achieve aims to promote their development and provide support. Within a non-evaluative longitudinal coach relationship, students build skills in driving their own learning and improvement. Coaches experience a satisfying yet challenging role. Ongoing faculty development within a coach community and funding for the role seem essential for coaches to fulfill their responsibilities.

Build It and They Shall Come: Medical Education Communities of Practice

Background

Producing scholarship in education is essential to the career development of a clinician-educator. Challenges to scholarly production include a lack of resources, time, expertise, and collaborators.

Objective

To develop communities of practice for education scholarship through an international society to increase community and academic productivity.

Methods

We developed multi-institutional scholarship pods within the American Thoracic Society through the creation of a working group (2017-2019). Pods met virtually, and meetings were goal focused to advance education scholarship within their area of interest. To understand the impact of these scholarship pods, we surveyed pod leaders and members in 2021 and analyzed the academic productivity of each pod via a survey of pod leaders and a review of the PubMed index.

Results

Nine pods were created, each with an assigned educational topic. The survey had a response rate of 76.6%. The perceived benefits were the opportunity to meet colleagues with similar interests at other institutions, production of scholarly work, and engagement in new experiences. The main challenges were difficulty finding times to meet because of competing clinical demands and aligning times among pod members. Regarding academic productivity, eight publications, four conference presentations, and one webinar/podcast were produced by six of the nine pods.

Conclusion

The development of communities of practice resulted in increased multi-site collaboration, with boosted academic productivity as well as an enhanced sense of belonging. Multiple challenges remain but can likely be overcome with accountability, early discussion of roles and expectations, and clear delegation of tasks and authorship.

The pipeline starts in medical school: characterizing clinician-educator training programs for U.S. medical students

In the past forty years, clinician-educators have become indispensable to academic medicine. Numerous clinician-educator-training programs exist within graduate medical education (GME) as clinician-educator tracks (CETs). However, there is a call for the clinician-educator pipeline to begin earlier. This work aims to identify and characterize clinician-educator track-like programs (CETLs) available in undergraduate medical education (UME). We developed an algorithm of 20 individual keyword queries to search the website of each U.S. allopathic medical school for CETLs. We performed the web search between March to April 2021 and repeated the search between July and September 2021. The search identified CETLs for 79 (51%) of the 155 U.S. allopathic medical schools. The identified CETLs commonly address the clinician-educator competency of educational theory (86%, 68/79), are formally organized as concentrations or analogous structures (52%, 41/79), and span all four years of medical school (37%, 29/79). The prevalence of CETLs varies with geography and medical school ranking. We provide an overview of the current state of CETLs as assessed from institutional websites. To create a future with a sustainable output of skilled clinician-educators, UME must continue to increase the number and quality of CETLs.

Clinician Educator Pathway for Nephrology Fellows: The University of North Carolina Experience

Nephrologists have a significant role in educating and mentoring trainees. They are considered role models and a major reason for fellows to be attracted to the specialty. Nephrology training programs not only support fellows in their teaching endeavors but also provide them with the necessary knowledge and skills required for advancing their careers as clinician educators. However, such career development tracks are limited in number and most focus on early career faculty. Here we present an overview of the various teaching opportunities for fellows at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Nephrology fellowship program and the development of a fellow-oriented clinician educator track. Our goal as part of the nephrology community is to empower the current nephrology fellows to develop fulfilling careers as nephrology clinician educators.

I am an Educator: Investigating Professional Identity Formation using Social Cognitive Career Theory

PhenomenonClinician-educators (CE) are physicians who fill a unique role within academic medicine, as they are responsible both for patient care and for training future physicians via teaching, curricular design, and creation of educational scholarship. Development of a strong professional identity as an educator leads to greater career satisfaction and a higher likelihood of staying in academic medicine. However, little is known about how this identity develops, especially in the training environment where there are competing pressures to develop as a clinician and researcher. This study aimed to explore professional identity formation in residents and fellows interested in becoming educators. Approach: We used a longitudinal, qualitative approach to investigate professional identity formation in residents and fellows participating in the Clinician-Educator Training Pathway. The longitudinal nature allowed us to temporally explore which aspects of the program and experiences acted as barriers or facilitators of professional identity formation as a CE. Our study used the social cognitive career theory (SCCT) Career Choice Model, which considers contextual influences in addition to the three variables of self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and goals. Findings: We found that participants shared a common goal of building self-efficacy as an educator. Participants took actions to engage more deliberately in formal and informal teaching and acting as an educator by giving learner feedback, developing curricula, and consuming and conducting educational research, all of which increased self-efficacy as educators. At the beginning of the program, participants were unclear of the roles and trajectories followed to become CEs. Engaging with a community of CEs clarified pathways and presented role models that could be seen as possible selves. This study also elucidated contextual influences relating to personal factors, career opportunities, and potential for advancement that mediated the goals and actions taken by participants to become educators. Insights: This study demonstrates that the SCCT Career Choice Model provides an excellent framework for understanding professional identity formation in future educators. Our participants built self-efficacy, formed outcome expectations, and set goals and took specific actions toward the goal of becoming an educator. Participants tested the various role model attributes as possible selves to see how those would be effective in their own career. Reflection on expectations, career goals, and self-efficacy as a clinician and an educator can assist in identity formation as a CE and can assist those designing CE training programs to better support identity formation in their participants.

Prioritizing Clinical Teaching Excellence: A Hidden Curriculum Problem

There have been many initiatives to improve the conditions of clinical teachers to enable them to achieve clinical teaching excellence in Academic Medical Centres (AMC). However, the success of such efforts has been limited due to unsupportive institutional cultures and the low value assigned to clinical teaching in comparison to clinical service and research. This forum article characterizes the low value and support for clinical teaching excellence as an expression of a hidden curriculum that is central to the cultural and structural etiology of the inequities clinical teachers experience in their pursuit of clinical teaching excellence. These elements include inequity in relation to time for participation in faculty development and recognition for clinical teaching excellence that exist within AMCs. To further compound these issues, AMCs often engage in the deployment of poor criteria and communication strategies concerning local standards of teaching excellence. Such inequities and poor governance can threaten the clinical teaching workforce's engagement, satisfaction and retention, and ultimately, can create negative downstream effects on the quality of patient care. While there are no clear normative solutions, we suggest that the examination of local policy documents, generation of stakeholder buy-in, and a culturally sensitive, localized needs assessment and integrated knowledge translation approach can develop a deeper understanding of the localized nature of this problem. The findings from local interrogations of structural, cultural and process problems can help to inform more tailored efforts to reform and improve the epistemic value of clinical teaching excellence. In conclusion, we outline a local needs assessment plan and research study that may serve as a conceptually generalizable foundation that could be applied to multiple institutional contexts.

ASPIRE: A Program for Developing Clinician Educators' Scholarship, Advancement, and Sense of Community

INTRODUCTION

Faculty development programs encouraging clinician educators' scholarship have been established at many medical schools. The same is true for programs that address the isolation and loneliness many faculty members feel in their day-to-day clinical work and administration. Few programs have explicitly combined development of scholarship and sense of community.

AIM

The goals of the Advanced Scholars Program for Internists in Research and Education (ASPIRE) are as follows: (1) provide training in scholarship development including research methods, implementation, and dissemination; (2) provide expert mentoring and support for professional development; and (3) create a greater sense of campus community.

SETTING

ASPIRE scholars are clinician educators in the Department of Medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The program runs 18 months, includes intensive mentoring, covered time for scholars and mentors, resources, and two half-day educational sessions per month focused on scholarship and community development.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Institutional leaders' public statements and actions regarding ASPIRE were documented by program leadership. Data collected from ASPIRE mentors and scholars through interviews and free text survey responses were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach. Two central themes were identified for both scholars and mentors: benefits and challenges of the program. Benefits included mentors, program design, community development, increased confidence, skills development, improved patient care, and institutional impact. Challenges included time to accomplish the program, balance of community-building and skills development, and lack of a clear path post-ASPIRE.

DISCUSSION

Combining skills-based learning with safe psychological space were judged important elements of success for the ASPIRE program. Conversations are ongoing to identify opportunities for scholars who have completed the program to continue to pursue scholarship, expand their skills, and build community. We conclude that the program both is feasible and was well-received. Sustainability and generalizability are important next steps in ensuring the viability of the program.

Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers' performances and achievements: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Over the last 31 years, there have been several institutional efforts to better recognize and reward clinician teachers. However, the perception of inadequate recognition and rewards by clinician teachers for their clinical teaching performance and achievements remains. The objective of this narrative review is two-fold: deepen understanding of the attributes of excellent clinician teachers considered for recognition and reward decisions and identify the barriers clinician teachers face in receiving recognition and rewards.

METHODS

We searched OVID Medline, Embase, Education Source and Web of Science to identify relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. After screening for eligibility, we conducted a content analysis of the findings from 43 relevant papers to identify key trends and issues in the literature.

RESULTS

We found the majority of relevant papers from the US context, a paucity of relevant papers from the Canadian context, and a declining international focus on the attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinician teachers since 2010. 'Provides feedback', 'excellent communication skills', 'good supervision', and 'organizational skills' were common cognitive attributes considered for recognition and rewards. 'Stimulates', 'passionate and enthusiastic', and 'creates supportive environment', were common non-cognitive attributes considered for recognition and rewards. The devaluation of teaching, unclear criteria, and unreliable metrics were the main barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinician teachers.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our narrative review highlight a need for local empirical research on recognition and reward issues to better inform local, context-specific reforms to policies and practices.

Essentials of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship: careers in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

The clinical and academic landscape of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) is evolving. Career opportunities for neonatologists have been impacted by shifts in compensation and staffing needs in both academic and private settings. The workforce in NPM is changing with respect to age and gender. Recruiting candidates from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine is a priority. Developing flexible positions and ensuring equitable salaries is critically important. Professional niches including administration, education, research, and quality improvement provide many opportunities for scholarly pursuit. Challenges exist in recruiting, mentoring, funding, and retaining physician-scientists in NPM. Creative solutions are necessary to balance the needs of the NPM workforce with the growing numbers, locations, and complexity of patients. Addressing these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach including adapting educational curricula, supporting trainees in finding their niche, identifying novel ways to address work/life integration, and attracting candidates with both diverse backgrounds and academic interests.

Guiding Academic Clinician Educators at Research-Intensive Institutions: a Framework for Chairs, Chiefs, and Mentors

Department chairs and division chiefs at research-intensive academic medical centers often find mentoring clinician educators challenging. These faculty constitute the majority of academic physicians. Supporting excellent clinician educators is key to ensuring high-quality patient care and developing tomorrow's physicians. Little has been written for leaders on strategies to advance academic clinician educators' career success. We present a framework to guide chairs, chiefs, and mentors seeking to address clinician educator retention and satisfaction in academic medical centers.

Project management tools for healthcare education

Health care education inherently requires managing projects, but few educators have the luxury of working with a project manager. In this article, we propose that applying project management theory to education work, and using project management software to organize our work, can improve our efficiency. We outline the approach project managers take to their work, which includes five steps: initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing. We apply project management theory to the processes involved with health care education projects, and we describe the typical work that would be done at each step. We introduce readers to project management software, using one free program as an example. We provide examples of how we have used the software successfully. Finally, we provide suggestions for educators to use when selecting project management software.

Can the Recruitment of Senior Transitioning Clinician Educators Enhance the Number and Quality of Resident Observations? Thinking Outside the Box

Issue: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System has forever changed the way faculty evaluate residents, fellows, and medical students, mandating direct observation by faculty of trainee performance. Evidence: The literature suggests that institutional culture does not support trainee observation, and faculty perceive that they have limited time to observe trainees in an efficient and effective manner. These factors contribute to an inadequate number of trainee observations, limiting faculty ability to assess trainees' achievement of competency. Hiring more faculty to increase observations has not been feasible or a priority, nor have faculty development programs been universally effective in recruiting faculty to enhance observations. Implications: To alleviate this important problem, the author proposes recruiting senior clinician educators transitioning to retirement. These are faculty who in their full-time careers have established themselves as playing a major role in teaching and might be interested in continuing their relationship with the academic health center. The number of these physicians is increasing and therefore there will be a larger pool seeking an opportunity to continue their commitment to education. Recruitment of senior clinician educators transitioning to retirement could significantly increase the number and quality of resident observations, addressing a previously insoluble problem with a relatively significant return on investment to the academic health center.

Becoming outstanding educators: What do they say contributed to success?

Aspiring medical educators and their advisors often lack clarity about career paths. To provide guidance to faculty pursuing careers as educators, we sought to explore perceived factors that contributed to the career development of outstanding medical educators. Using a thematic analysis, investigators at two institutions interviewed 39 full or associate professor physician faculty with prominent roles as medical educators in 2016. The social cognitive career theory (SCCT) informed the interview guide. Investigators developed the codebook and performed iterative analysis using qualitative methods. Extensive team discussion generated the final themes. Eight themes emerged related to preparation, early successes, mentors, networks, faculty development, balance, work environment, and multiple identities. Preparation led to early successes, which served as "launch points," while mentors, networks, and faculty development programs served as career accelerators to open more opportunities, and a supportive work environment was an additional enabler of this pathway. Educators who reported balance between work and outside interests described boundary setting as well as selectively choosing new opportunities to establish boundaries in mid-career. Participants described multiple professional identities, and clinician and educator identities tended to merge and reinforce each other as careers progressed. This study revealed common themes describing trajectories of success among medical educators. These themes aligned with the SCCT, and typically replayed and spiraled over the course of the educators' careers. These findings resonate with other studies, lending credence to an approach to career development that can be shared with junior faculty who are exploring careers in medical education.

Medical education today: all that glitters is not gold

BACKGROUND

The medical education system based on principles advocated by Flexner and Osler has produced generations of scientifically grounded and clinically skilled physicians whose collective experiences and contributions have served medicine and patients well. Yet sweeping changes launched around the turn of the millennium have constituted a revolution in medical education. In this article, a critique is presented of the new undergraduate medical education (UME) curricula in relationship to graduate medical education (GME) and clinical practice.

DISCUSSION

Medical education has changed and will continue to change in response to scientific advances and societal needs. However, enthusiasm for reform needs to be tempered by a more measured approach to avoid unintended consequences. Movement from novice to master in medicine cannot be rushed. An argument is made for a shoring up of biomedical science in revised curricula with the beneficiaries being nascent practitioners, developing physician-scientists --and the public.

CONCLUSION

Unless there is further modification, the new integrated curricula are at risk of produce graduates deficient in the characteristics that have set physicians apart from other healthcare professionals, namely high-level clinical expertise based on a deep grounding in biomedical science and understanding of the pathologic basis of disease. The challenges for education of the best possible physicians are great but the benefits to medicine and society are enormous.