1
|
Kahn JM, Sandhu N, von Eyben R, Deig C, Obeid JP, Miller JA, Pollom E. Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) for Medical Students. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:29-35. [PMID: 33845145 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe the implementation of a novel virtual educational program for medical students, Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER), and its effect on student interest and knowledge in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS ROVER comprised a series of virtual educational panels with case-based discussions across disease sites tailored to medical students. The panels were moderated by radiation oncology residents and included faculty panelists from academic radiation oncology programs across the country. Student pre- and postsession surveys were collected. Paired t tests were used to compare the pre- and postsession assessment results. RESULTS Six ROVER sessions were held from June 4, 2020, to August 20, 2020, with a total of 427 medical students registering for at least 1 session. Of these, 231 students attended at least 1 session, with 140 completing at least 1 postsession survey (60.6% response rate). Fourth-year medical students were the largest group represented among attendees (32.0%). Most attendees had exposure to radiation oncology (78.8%) before the sessions. The majority of students signed up for these sessions for education (90.6%). Some students signed up for the sessions to help with specialty selection (30.9%) and to network (30.4%). Medical students' understanding of the role of radiation oncology in each disease site (breast, sarcoma, central nervous system, pediatrics, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecologic, lymphoma, lung, and head and neck) was improved by attending each session (pre- vs postsession; P < .0001 for all disease sites). Over three-quarters of respondents stated they were considering applying or were likely to apply to radiation oncology both before and after the sessions. CONCLUSIONS ROVER improved medical student perceived knowledge of radiation oncology across all disease sites covered. ROVER fulfills a need for a national medical student education platform for radiation oncology. Future work is warranted to augment virtual and open educational platforms to improve access to radiation oncology education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna M Kahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Navjot Sandhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rie von Eyben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Christopher Deig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jean-Pierre Obeid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Jacob A Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Erqi Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rallis KS, Wozniak AM, Hui S, Nicolaides M, Shah N, Subba B, Papalois A, Sideris M. Inspiring the future generation of oncologists: a UK-wide study of medical students' views towards oncology. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:82. [PMID: 33530974 PMCID: PMC7852146 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02506-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One in 2 people born in the UK after 1960 are expected to require oncology input in their lifetime. However, only 36% of UK medical schools provide dedicated oncology placements and teaching indicating a discordance between public health impact and training. We designed a UK-wide survey to capture medical students' views on current oncology teaching and the potential role of a national undergraduate oncology symposium as an educational, networking and motivational tool. METHODS We undertook a national cross-sectional survey of UK medical students' views in oncology and satisfaction with teaching using pre-designed questionnaires. We also distributed a dedicated survey (pre and post-conference) to compare medical students' motivation towards a career in oncology after attending the national symposium. This study was prospectively approved by QMUL Ethics Committee (Reference number QMREC2348). Statistical analysis included univariate inferential tests on SPSS and GraphPad software. RESULTS The national survey was completed by 166 students representing 22 UK medical schools. Students reported limited interest, knowledge and exposure to oncology, lack of confidence in skills, and teaching dissatisfaction. Oncology was perceived as a challenging specialty (mean 4.5/5 ± 0.7), yet most students estimate receiving only 1-2 weeks of dedicated oncology teaching. The national symposium generated a statically significant increase in students' interest, knowledge, and confidence in skills surrounding oncology, improving students' perceived ability to cope with the emotional challenges in this field. CONCLUSION Students' views towards oncology alongside their teaching dissatisfaction underpin the need to revisit and strive to improve current undergraduate oncology curricula. Increasing medical student oncology exposure by proposing outcome-based guidelines and adopting a standardised undergraduate oncology curriculum should be the foremost priority in inspiring future oncologists to ensure excellent cancer patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrine S Rallis
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anna Maria Wozniak
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sara Hui
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Marios Nicolaides
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Neha Shah
- Newham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Beena Subba
- North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Michail Sideris
- Women's Health Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Virtual Radiation Oncology Clerkship During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:444-451. [PMID: 32890529 PMCID: PMC7462792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the impact of a virtual radiation oncology clerkship. Methods and Materials We developed a 2-week virtual radiation oncology clerkship that launched on April 27, 2020. Clerkship components included a virtual clinic with radiation oncology faculty and residents, didactic lectures, student talks, and supplemental sessions such as tumor boards and chart rounds. Medical students completed pre- and post-clerkship self-assessments. Faculty and resident participants also completed surveys on their experience with virtual lectures and clinics. Pre- and post-clerkship results were compared using a 2-sided paired t test. An analysis of variance model was used to analyze the clerkship components. Results Twenty-six medical students, including 4 visiting students, enrolled over 2 clerkship periods (4 weeks). All students completed the pre- and post-clerkship self-assessments and agreed that the clerkship improved their understanding of radiation oncology. Compared with 3 (11.5%) students who agreed that they understood the daily responsibilities of a radiation oncologist before the clerkship, 22 (84.6%) students agreed and 3 (11.5%) strongly agreed that they understood the daily responsibilities of a radiation oncologist after the clerkship (P < .0001). Although 15 students (57.7%) reported an increased interest in radiation oncology because of the clerkship, the mean level of interest in radiation oncology as a career remained the same, with pre- and post-clerkship scores of 3.0 (±0.9) and 3.0 (±1.1) on a 5-point scale, respectively (P = .7). Students found virtual clinic and didactic lectures to be the most valuable components of the clerkship. Most respondents agreed (30.8%) or strongly agreed (65.4%) to recommend the clerkship to their classmates. Conclusions Our virtual clerkship was effective in increasing medical student interest in and knowledge about radiation oncology. These data will help optimize a new paradigm of virtual radiation oncology education for medical students during COVID-19 and beyond.
Collapse
|
4
|
Klufas A, Shin G, Raphael R, Sarfaty SC, Hirsch AE. A Thorough Analysis of the Current State of Cancer Education in Medical Schools and Application of Experimental Teaching Techniques and Their Efficacy. ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2020; 11:931-946. [PMID: 33293885 PMCID: PMC7719335 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s268382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Newly diagnosed cases of cancer are expected to double by the year 2040. Although many different oncology teaching initiatives have been implemented, many students continue to report uncertainty when dealing with patients with cancer. Through this review, we aim to find the most effective teaching methods to better prepare future physicians. Papers studying different methods of teaching oncology were identified through a thorough review of specific electronic databases. Each study was analyzed and sorted into one of ten unique categories created by the authors specifically for this review. If portions of the study fit into multiple categories, relevant results would be analyzed in all applicable areas. Additionally, papers were separated and analyzed by country of origin, preclinical or clinical interventional basis, and quantitative versus qualitative form of statistical analysis. A total of 115 papers from 26 different countries and regions were included in the final analysis. 91.4% of papers analyzing Lecture and Small Group Discussions indicated a positive impact. 97.1% of papers analyzing Clinical Practice and Simulation indicated a positive impact. 100% of papers analyzing Early Experience and Mentorship, Summer Programs and Voluntary Electives, use of Multidisciplinary Teams, and Role Play stated that these methods had a positive impact. 50% of papers analyzing Computer/Web Based Programs indicated a positive impact. Clinical Practice and Simulation, Role Play, Summer/Elective Programs and interventions involving Multidisciplinary Team Work all appeared to be most effective. Intensive Block Programs, Didactic Lectures/Small Group Discussions, and Computer/Web Based Education tools as a whole were variable. General Review papers showed continued variability in domestic and international oncology curricula. Incorporation of effective teaching interventions should be highly considered in the future creation of standardized oncology curricula in order to best prepare the next generation of physicians. Future studies could explore the differing efficacies of teaching interventions in the postgraduate versus graduate realms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Klufas
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grace Shin
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ryan Raphael
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Suzanne C Sarfaty
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariel E Hirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agarwal A, Shah A, Shah B, Koottappillil B, Hirsch AE. The Impact of a Radiation Oncologist led Oncology Curriculum on Medical Student Knowledge. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:1176-1180. [PMID: 28488259 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1227-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Medical students at our institution all take a pre-clinical oncology course as well as a clinical radiation oncology didactic session during their clinical curriculum. The objective of this analysis is to demonstrate the impact of the radiation oncology didactic on medical student knowledge of core oncology concepts. All students received a standardized didactic lecture introducing students to core concepts of general oncology and radiation. We administered an 18-question pretest and a posttest examining student knowledge between 2012 and 2015. Changes in student responses between pre-test and post-tests were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the didactic session. Over the course of three years, 319 (64.4%) of 495 students who completed the Radiology block completed both the pre-test and post-test. The average student test grade improved from 62.0% on the pretest to 69.6% on the posttest (p < 0.001). By category, students increased their score from 81.4% to 89.8% (p < 0.001) in general oncology, from 59.9% to 69.9% (p < 0.001) in breast oncology, from 43.0% to 51.0% (p < 0.001) in prostate oncology, and from 71.3% to 75.7% (p = 0.003) in radiation oncology. Students showed increases in knowledge across general oncology, prostate oncology, breast oncology, and radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Moakley Building Lower Level, 830 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| | - Aishwarya Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Moakley Building Lower Level, 830 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Bhartesh Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Moakley Building Lower Level, 830 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Brian Koottappillil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Moakley Building Lower Level, 830 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Ariel E Hirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Moakley Building Lower Level, 830 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agarwal A, Koottappillil B, Shah B, Ahuja D, Hirsch AE. Medical Student--Reported Outcomes of a Radiation Oncologist--Led Preclinical Course in Oncology: A Five-Year Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:735-9. [PMID: 26104929 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2015] [Revised: 02/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a recognized need for more robust training in oncology for medical students. At our institution, we have offered a core dedicated oncology block, led by a radiation oncologist course director, during the second year of the medical school curriculum since the 2008-2009 academic year. Herein, we report the outcomes of the oncology block over the past 5 years through an analysis of student perceptions of the course, both immediately after completion of the block and in the third year. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 2 separate surveys. The first assessed student impressions of how well the course met each of the course's learning objectives through a survey that was administered to students immediately after the oncology block in 2012. The second was administered after students completed the oncology block during the required radiology clerkship in the third year. All questions used a 5-level Likert scale and were analyzed by use of a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS Of the 169 students who took the oncology course in 2012, 127 (75.1%) completed the course feedback survey. Over 73% of students agreed or strongly agreed that the course met its 3 learning objectives. Of the 699 medical students who took the required radiology clerkship between 2010 and 2013, 538 participated in the second survey, for a total response rate of 77%. Of these students, 368 (68.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that the course was effective in contributing to their overall medical education. CONCLUSION Student perceptions of the oncology block are favorable and have improved across multiple categories since the inception of the course. Students self-reported that a dedicated preclinical oncology block was effective in helping identify the basics of cancer therapy and laying the foundation for clinical electives in oncology, including radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Agarwal
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Bhartesh Shah
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Divya Ahuja
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ariel E Hirsch
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agarwal A, DeNunzio NJ, Ahuja D, Hirsch AE. Beyond the standard curriculum: a review of available opportunities for medical students to prepare for a career in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88:39-44. [PMID: 24331649 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2013] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review currently available opportunities for medical students to supplement their standard medical education to prepare for a career in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS Google and PubMed were used to identify existing clinical, health policy, and research programs for medical students in radiation oncology. In addition, results publicly available by the National Resident Matching Program were used to explore opportunities that successful radiation oncology applicants pursued during their medical education, including obtaining additional graduate degrees. RESULTS Medical students can pursue a wide variety of opportunities before entering radiation oncology. Several national specialty societies, such as the American Society for Radiation Oncology and the Radiological Society of North America, offer summer internships for medical students interested in radiation oncology. In 2011, 30% of allopathic senior medical students in the United States who matched into radiation oncology had an additional graduate degree, including PhD, MPH, MBA, and MA degrees. Some medical schools are beginning to further integrate dedicated education in radiation oncology into the standard 4-year medical curriculum. CONCLUSIONS To the authors' knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of available opportunities for medical students interested in radiation oncology. Early exposure to radiation oncology and additional educational training beyond the standard medical curriculum have the potential to create more successful radiation oncology applicants and practicing radiation oncologists while also promoting the growth of the field. We hope this review can serve as guide to radiation oncology applicants and mentors as well as encourage discussion regarding initiatives in radiation oncology opportunities for medical students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas J DeNunzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Divya Ahuja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ariel E Hirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
DeNunzio NJ, Joseph L, Handal R, Agarwal A, Ahuja D, Hirsch AE. Devising the optimal preclinical oncology curriculum for undergraduate medical students in the United States. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2013; 28:228-36. [PMID: 23681770 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0442-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
A third of women and a near majority of men in the United States will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetimes. To prepare future physicians for this reality, we have developed a preclinical oncology curriculum that introduces second-year medical students to essential concepts and practices in oncology to improve their abilities to appropriately care for these patients. We surveyed the oncology and education literature and compiled subjects important to students' education including basic science and clinical aspects of oncology and addressing patients' psychosocial needs. Along with the proposed curriculum content, scheduling, independent learning exercises, and case studies, we discuss practical considerations for curriculum implementation based on experience at our institution. Given the changing oncology healthcare landscape, all (new) physicians must competently address their cancer patients' needs, regardless of chosen specialty. A thorough and logically organized cancer curriculum for preclinical medical students should help achieve these aims. This new model curriculum, with accompanying strategies to evaluate its efforts, is essential to update how medical students are educated about cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J DeNunzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, 830 Harrison Avenue, Moakley Building - LL, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|