The social and learning environments experienced by underrepresented minority medical students: a narrative review

Association of Residency Applicant Sociodemographic Characteristics With Specialty Choice and Interview Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations of residency applicant sociodemographic characteristics with specialty choice, academic metrics, and application outcomes. Academic metrics included clerkship honors, honor society membership, United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores, degree type (allopathic or osteopathic), second degrees or research year, required remediation, couples match, research output, and volunteer or leadership positions.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of applicants who responded to the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency (STAR) survey.

SETTING

National survey of medical students in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical students in the United States participating in the 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023 residency application cycles.

RESULTS

Among 10,856 applicants during the 2022 and 2023 match years, 1,687 (15.5%) identified as Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM), 1642 (15.1%) were the first generation to attend college, 931 (8.6%) reported a history of food or housing insecurity, and 6104 (56.2%) identified as female. All of these groups were significantly less likely to apply to surgical subspecialties (OR 0.76, p < 0.001; OR 0.81, p = 0.009; OR 0.81, p = 0.041; OR 0.41, p < 0.001, respectively). When adjusting for academic metrics, this association persisted for female applicants (OR 0.58, p < 0.001), and it was the inverse for URiM applicants (OR 1.28, p = 0.016). Applicants with a history of food or housing insecurity had a lower match rate (73.3% vs. 83.4%; p = 0.008) than those without. Interview and match outcomes were noninferior among the other sociodemographic groups historically underrepresented in surgery.

CONCLUSION

Underrepresentation, already pervasive in medicine, is amplified in surgical subspecialties, underscoring the need for applying an equity lens across the continuum of medical education.

A practical primer on clinical supervision of learners in the emergency department

Introduction

Effective supervision of learners in the clinical environment is essential for learner professional development and patient safety. Despite this importance, many supervising attendings receive little to no training around supervising learners. As faculty join emergency departments (EDs) at primary and affiliate training sites, it is essential to provide them with a framework to utilize when approaching learner supervision.

Methods

A workgroup of members from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Education Committee was formed to respond to a directive from the SAEM board to identify best practices for new clinician educators when supervising learners. Drawing on their experience and expertise in learner supervision, medical education, and faculty development, the members completed a literature search to identify best practices in supervision, with a special focus on the ED environment.

Analysis

The workgroup identified three domains that must be considered to provide effective supervision to learners: learner characteristics, supervisor characteristics, and clinical environment.

Recommendations

Implementing effective supervision in the clinical environment requires a multifaceted approach and consideration of factors for both the learner and the supervisor. Direct observation, supplemented by standardized assessment tools, is the preferred supervision method; however, the demands of our clinical environment may require supervisors to assess the learner's proficiency using other methods including informal knowledge assessments, inference from oral presentations, review of clinical documentation, feedback from patients themselves, procedural walkthroughs, and secondhand information from the health care or training team.

Big data analysis: examination of the relationship between candidates' sociodemographic characteristics and performance in the UK's Membership of the Royal College of Physicians Part 1 examination

Big datasets and data analytics enable granular analyses examining group differences in performance. Our focus is on differential attainment (DA) in postgraduate College (Board) examinations. We asked: Are candidates' sociodemographic characteristics associated with performance on the UK's Membership of the Royal College of Physicians (MRCP) Part 1 after adjusting for medical school performance (MSP) and type of medical programme? This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 6040 medical graduates with linked sociodemographic data in the UK Medical Education Database qualifying from a UK medical school (2012-2014) and sitting MRCP Part 1 before October 2019. Chi-squared tests established univariable associations with MRCP performance (pass/fail first sitting MRCP Part 1). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified independent explanatory factors of success, adjusted for medical school. The odds (95% CI) of passing MRCP Part 1 exams on first sitting were greater for men (OR = 1.61, CI 1.42-1.81, p < 0.001) and those on a graduate entry programme (OR = 1.44, 1.05-1.99, p < 0.001). The odds of passing were lower as age increases (OR = 0.87, 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001), for minority ethnic (OR = 0.61, CI 0.53-0.7, p < 0.001), and gateway to medicine (OR = 0.49, CI 0.27-0.90, p = 0.02) candidates. After adjusting for MSP, odds were greater for passing in men (OR = 1.62, CI 1.24-2.11, p < 0.001) and candidates with higher MSP (OR = 4.12, CI 3.40-4.96, p < 0.001). Our findings illustrate how performance on MRCP part 1 is associated with group-level social and educational factors. This DA may be due to aspects of the assessment itself, and/or the persistent nature of social and educational disadvantage.

Differential attainment at national selection for higher surgical training: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

National selection for higher surgical specialty training (HST) in the UK is a high-stakes gatekeeping assessment. If barriers, such as differential attainment, exist at HST selection for some groups and not others, then this will have a significant and lasting impact on trainees' career progression and the diversity of the workforce, which should reflect the population it provides care for. The objective of this study was to characterise the relationship between candidate sociodemographic factors and performance at National Selection for HST in the UK.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

National Selection for HST in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

All UK graduates in the UKMED database (https://www.ukmed.ac.uk) who underwent selection for HST from 2012 to 2019.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Performance at HST Selection for each surgical specialty is measured by assessment of the candidate's academic portfolio and multiple objective structured clinical examination style stations testing knowledge and skills. Univariate analysis identified differences in success rates at first application. Logistic regression models identified sociodemographic predictors of success after adjusting for prior academic attainment (Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) performance).

RESULTS

Of all applications to HST (n=2875), 66.5% were successful at the first attempt. Females were 32% more likely than males to be successful at selection for HST (OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67)). MRCS performance was found to be a strong independent predictor of future success at HST selection. Females were more likely to be successful at general surgery selection (OR 2.69 (95% CI 1.63 to 4.45)), older candidates (graduates) were less likely to be successful at ENT selection (OR 0.21 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.95)), and candidates that were the first in their family to attend University were less likely to be successful at urology selection (OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.78)).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight few statistically significant associations and no consistent patterns between sociodemographic factors and performance at HST selection once we adjusted for prior academic attainment. This suggests that differences in performance on selection into HST may be more likely due to individual rather than group-level differences.

Bridging the Gap: Implementing an Adjunct Faculty as a Remediation Specialist in a Physician Assistant/Associate Program

INTRODUCTION

Creating a successful remediation plan for physician assistant/associate students comes with its challenges, particularly because of the limited time available for both faculty and students. In an accelerated 24-month program, the pace of the curriculum leaves little time to fall behind in mastering knowledge and skills. One possible solution is appointing an adjunct faculty member to serve as a dedicated Remediation Specialist (RS) to focus solely on student remediation.

METHODS

The RS reviews assessments of failing students and develops a review session based on shared areas of weakness among them. This session is promptly offered postassessment to ensure timely review. While required for failing students, the session is open to all didactic students. In addition, students complete a remediation assignment of their choice.

RESULTS

Implementation of a RS demonstrated positive program outcomes. Students requiring remediation receive re-education in areas of deficiency within the curriculum. Furthermore, the time burden is shifted away from the core faculty. Students are remediated in targeted areas.

DISCUSSION

Dedicated remediation specialists are commonly used in health profession education programs. The utilization of these specialists often results in higher examination pass rates, licensure pass rates, and improved clinical skills. While some programs select a candidate training in education and pedagogy, our program's RS is a trained physician assistant/associate and able to provide discipline-specific support.

From othering to belonging: a framework for DEI history-telling and strategising

The medical profession in the USA is-and has long been-a segregated workforce. Currently, just 5.0% of all US physicians are black. Understanding the origins and mechanisms of this disparity is essential to creating a future where black healing and healers are supported by our medical system. In pursuit of this future, this article offers 'othering' and 'belonging' as frames of analysis and intervention for diversity and equity initiatives.Building on previous historical studies of racism in medicine, this project reveals how the figure of the 'American physician' was created through exclusionary/othering tactics. In part 1, we analyse antebellum historical sources to demonstrate the role of medicine in creating and promulgating racial categories and hierarchies. Next, in part 2, we explore the historical conditions that produced the American physician as a significant professional identity by analysing texts by the American Medical Association and affiliated state medical societies. Then, we turn towards solutions in part 3. To redress inequities produced by othering, particularly the continued exclusion of black people from the medical profession, we argue that medical leaders should cultivate a professional culture of belonging. As we will explain, belonging goes beyond tolerating and respecting difference; it entails shared culture, equal rights and inclusive structures.

Underrepresented in Medicine Trainees' Sense of Belonging and Professional Identity Formation after Participation in the Leadership Education in Advancing Diversity Program

BACKGROUND

There are persistent structural barriers that threaten inclusion and retention of underrepresented in medicine (UIM) residents and fellows (trainees) as future faculty in academic medicine. We developed the Leadership Education in Advancing Diversity (LEAD) Program at a single, academic institution, to address these barriers through a 10-month longitudinal curriculum across Graduate Medical Education for trainees to develop leadership and scholarship skills in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

OBJECTIVE

Explore how participation in LEAD impacted UIM trainees' sense of belonging and professional identity formation in academic medicine as well as perceptions about pursuing a career in academic medicine and future leadership roles.

METHODS

Institutional Review Board-approved qualitative study in August 2020-August 2021 with individual, semi-structured interviews of UIM LEAD graduates from the first four cohorts (2017-2021). Data were analyzed by two authors using modified grounded theory.

RESULTS

Fourteen UIM trainees were interviewed; seven themes emerged. Critical aspects of the program: 1) Creation of a community of shared DEI values, 2) Mentorship, 3) Role of allies. Results of the program: 4) Deepened appreciation of personal and professional identity as UIM, 5) Fostered belonging in academic medicine, 6) Appreciation of different careers in academic medicine and how to integrate DEI interests, and 7) Inspired trainees to pursue leadership roles.

CONCLUSIONS

LEAD can serve as a model for other institutions that seek to support UIM trainees' sense of belonging, professional identity formation, and perceptions about pursuing careers in academic medicine and future leadership roles.

Reports of Burnout Among Historically Marginalized and Female Graduating Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic

PURPOSE

To examine graduating medical student reports of burnout by sex, race and ethnicity, and sexual orientation and explore trends within intersectional demographic groups from 2019-2021 in a national sample.

METHOD

The authors obtained medical student responses to the 2019-2021 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaires (GQs) linked to data from other AAMC sources. The dataset included year of GQ completion, responses to a modified Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (exhaustion subscale range: 0-24; disengagement subscale range: 0-15), and demographics previously shown to relate to the risk of burnout in medical students, residents, or physicians. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent associations between demographics and burnout.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 80.7%. After controlling for other factors, mean exhaustion scores were higher among Asian (parameter estimate [PE] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21, 0.54), bisexual (PE 0.97, 95% CI 0.76, 1.17), and gay or lesbian (PE 0.55, 95% CI 0.35, 0.75) students than those who did not identify with each of those respective groups. Mean disengagement scores were lower among female (PE -0.47, 95% CI -0.52, -0.42), Hispanic (PE -0.11, 95% CI -0.22, -0.01), and White (PE -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, 0.00) students and higher among Asian (PE 0.17, 95% CI 0.07, 0.27), Black or African American (PE 0.31, 95% CI 0.18, 0.44), bisexual (PE 0.54, 95% CI 0.41, 0.66), and gay or lesbian (PE 0.23, 95% CI 0.11, 0.35) students than those who did not identify with each of those respective groups. From 2019-2021, mean exhaustion and disengagement scores were relatively stable or improved across nearly all intersectional groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Male, Asian, Black or African American, and sexual minority students had a higher risk of burnout, while female, Hispanic, White, and heterosexual or straight students had a lower risk of burnout.

Exploring the educational journey: perspectives of ethnic minority GP-trainees in Dutch GP-specialty training - a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Previous research highlights persistent differential attainment by ethnicity in medical education, wherein the perceived inclusiveness significantly influences ethnic minority students' and trainees' outcomes. Biased organizational practices and microaggressions exacerbate the challenges faced by ethnic minorities, leading to lower academic performance and higher dropout rates. Consequently, understanding ethnic minority GP-trainees' experiences and perspectives regarding relevant educational aspects is crucial for addressing these disparities and cultivating a more inclusive environment within medical education.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We aimed to investigate the experiences of minority GP-trainees throughout their educational journey in Dutch GP-specialty training, emphasizing their challenges, sources of support, and suggestions for enhancing their learning environment.

METHOD

We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with minority GP trainees, employing purposive convenience sampling to ensure diversity across multiple dimensions. These included gender, age, ethnicity, social background, migration generation, educational stage, encountered challenges, sources of support, and the GP training institute attended. The analysis involved iterative, open and axial coding, followed by generating, reviewing, and defining themes. For a structured analysis of encountered microaggressions, we adopted Sue's Taxonomy of Microaggressions.

RESULTS

All fourteen ethnic minority interviewees had faced educational barriers stemming from misunderstandings and stereotyping in a predominantly 'white' organization. These barriers impacted various aspects of their education, including professional identity formation, application, admission, assessment procedures, social networks, course content, and expert guidance. Microaggressions permeated throughout their educational journey, hindering their full expression and potential. Their ideal GP-specialty training emphasized uniqueness of all trainees, comprehensive staff engagement in inclusivity, robust diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-policies, individual mentorship, transparent standards, concise language usage in test questions, and bias elimination through mandatory DEI staff training.

CONCLUSION

Ethnic minority GP-trainees in the Netherlands face significant challenges like biased assessment and admission, stereotyped course content, inadequate support networks, and microaggressions, putting them at risk for underperformance outcomes. They emphasize the need for inclusive training with robust DEI-policies to eliminate bias.

Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Medical Students' Identity Formation

Importance

Investigating racial and ethnic discrimination in medical education is crucial for addressing disparities and fostering an inclusive environment.

Objective

To assess how racial and ethnic discrimination in medical school is associated with personal and professional identity formation (PPIF) by race and ethnicity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study used deidentified data on 37 610 medical students who matriculated in 2014 or 2015 and took the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) between 2016 and 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from September 1 to November 20, 2023.

Exposures

Experiences of racial and ethnic discrimination were assessed through responses to 3 GQ questions about denial of opportunities, offensive remarks or names, and lower evaluations or grades due to race or ethnicity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Personal and professional development were measured as 2 separate outcomes using 2 GQ statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale (where 1 indicated strongly disagree and 5 indicated strongly agree): "My medical school has done a good job fostering and nurturing my development as a person" and "My medical school has done a good job fostering and nurturing my development as a physician." Variables of personal and professional development were both dichotomized.

Results

Of 37 610 medical students, 18 200 (48.4%) were female, and 19 410 (51.6%) were male; 2458 (6.5%) were African American or Black, 7801 (20.7%) were Asian, 2430 (6.5%) were Hispanic, 21 380 (56.9%) were White, 2404 (6.4%) were multiracial, and 1137 (3%) were other race or ethnicity. Most respondents attested that their medical school fostered their personal (27 272 [72.5%]) and professional (34 560 [91.9%]) development. African American or Black students reported the lowest rates of personal (1603 of 2458 [65.2%]) and professional (2182 of 2458 [88.8%]) development, and experienced lower likelihoods of personal (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.93]) and professional (ARR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97]) development than White students. Racial discrimination was inversely associated with development, with the highest PPIF rates among those never experiencing discrimination (personal, 25 089 of 33 508 [74.9%]; and professional, 31 257 of 33 508 [93.3%]). Those experiencing isolated discrimination (personal: ARR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.80-0.87]; professional: ARR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]) and recurrent discrimination (personal: ARR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.60-0.66]; professional: ARR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.80-0.84]) had relatively lower likelihoods of PPIF. African American or Black students experienced the highest rate of recurrent discrimination (543 of 2458 [22.1%]). No significant PPIF risk differences were found for other racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine without discrimination compared with White students without discrimination, but all groups with recurrent discrimination had relatively lower PPIF risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of US medical students, racial and ethnic discrimination was associated with lower PPIF across all racial and ethnic groups compared with White students without such experiences. African American or Black students disproportionately faced this discrimination. Systemic changes in medical education are needed to combat discrimination and ensure equity in holistic student development.

Cultivating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Pulmonary and Critical Care Training: A Path Toward Health Care Excellence

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship training faces increasing competition but lacks diversity, hindering health care excellence. Despite a growing interest in the field, programs lack diverse representation. Addressing this issue is crucial to combat health disparities and bias, benefiting trainees, practitioners, and patients. Sustainable solutions are vital for achieving diversity, equity, and inclusion in PCCM. Strategies for achieving equity among training programs include adopting inclusive recruitment practices, recognizing differential attainment, addressing bias, fostering an equitable academic climate, and implementing multifaceted strategic processes to enhance diversity in mentorship including recognition and compensation for diversity and equity work.

Unpacking the Social Constructs of Discrimination, Othering, and Belonging in Medical Schools

ISSUE

Triggered by the lived experiences of the authors-one junior career, female, and black; the other senior career, male, and black-we provide a critical, sociological overview of the plight of racial/ethnic minority students in medical education. We analyze the concepts of categorization, othering, and belonging in medical education, which we use to shed light on the psychological and academic consequences of overgeneralizing social categories.

EVIDENCE

The ability to categorize people into different social groups is a natural, subconscious phenomenon. Creating social groups is believed to aid people in navigating the world. This permits people to relate to others based on assumed opinions and actions. Race and gender are two primary dimensions of categorization, with race or ethnicity being a particularly salient category. However, over-generalization of social categories can lead the categorizer to think, judge, and treat themselves and members of a perceived group similarly, leading to prejudice and stereotyping. Social categorization also occurs in educational settings across the globe. The consequences of categorization may influence a student's feelings of belonging and academic success.

IMPLICATIONS

Our analysis reflects on how to promote equitable opportunities for ethnic minority medical trainees through the lens of those who have experienced and succeeded in an inequitable system. By revisiting the social and psychological constructs that determine and influence the academic progress and success of minority students in medical education, we discovered that more engagement is (still) needed for critical discourse on this topic. We expect such conversations to help generate new insights to improve inclusion and equity in our educational systems.

Upholding our PROMISE: Increased representation is not enough to foster belonging in graduate medical education

PURPOSE

Sense of belonging supports academic achievement and encourages career endurance. The purpose of this study was to characterize what individual and institutional factors influence one's sense of belonging by describing the experiences of underrepresented in medicine (UIM) paediatric and internal medicine-paediatric residents in the United States.

METHOD

The authors conducted a national survey of paediatric and internal medicine-paediatric residents. The 23-item anonymous web-based survey was distributed between October 2020 and January 2021 and included questions on socio-demographic characteristics and individual perceptions on sense of belonging, value, common mission or values at a program or institution and respect. The authors used linear mixed models and fitted regression models to examine individual factors and environmental factors that impact sense of belonging, value and respect.

RESULTS

Across 29 residency programs, 938 (53%) of 1748 residents completed the survey. One hundred sixty-seven (18%) self-identified as UIM. UIM residents had a lower sense of belonging than non-UIM residents [mean (SD) 3.6 (0.87) vs. 4.0 (0.57)]. Black/AA and Hispanic/Latinx residents had the lowest sense of belonging [3.5 (0.82) and 2.8 (0.93), respectively]. UIM residents demonstrated decreased sense of belonging in programs that lacked bias training and where peers discriminated against them. Sense of belonging was increased in programs where they perceived a sense of support, respect or values alignment. Surprisingly, individual UIM resident sense of belonging was not improved by having more UIM residents in a program.

CONCLUSION

UIM paediatric residents experience a decreased sense of belonging during training. Programs can support sense of belonging for UIM residents by demonstrating respect and support for them and by offering systems for bias training and reporting bias and discrimination. Recruiting a greater number of UIM trainees remains important; however, compositional diversity alone does not improve a sense of belonging for UIM residents. There is continued need for structural/institutional change, including addressing institutional culture and structural racism.

Changing the Approach in Supporting and Advancing Underrepresented in Medicine (UIM) Medical Students

Introduction

Research has shown the importance of diversity in improving patient care. Medical students from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (UIM) face unique challenges, including minority tax, stereotype threat, and expectations to be the sole representative of their identity group. Mentors must be aware of these challenges and develop skills to address them.

Methods

We designed a 90-minute workshop about the challenges UIM students encounter in medical school and best practices in mentorship. Target audience and facilitators were undergraduate medical educators. Three videos and questions for case-based facilitated small-group discussion with medical school faculty and administrators were included. Using a retrospective pre-post design, we elicited participants' confidence level in recognizing and addressing issues UIM students may experience and plans to apply skills gained in the workshop.

Results

Workshop participants (N = 57) reported a mean increase in confidence rating of 20-26 points out of 100 for recognizing, identifying, and applying skills related to optimal UIM mentorship (mean confidence: 53-60 preworkshop, 79-81 postworkshop). Participants also reported a mean of 82 in readiness to apply skills learned. Participants rated the workshop a 4.6 in overall helpfulness on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not helpful, 5 = extremely helpful).

Discussion

Health care professionals working with UIM medical students have an essential role in mentorship and support. This workshop provides a structured forum to discuss challenges and build awareness, comfort, and skills regarding engaging in meaningful discussions about race and the experiences of medical students, even when identities are incongruent.

Burnout, Exhaustion, Experiences of Discrimination, and Stress Among Underrepresented and First-Generation College Students in Graduate Health Profession Education

OBJECTIVES

Mental health disorders are increasing among health profession students. Compounding this, students from underrepresented backgrounds may face additional stressors and challenges. The aims of this study were to: (1) assess the extent to which burnout, exhaustion, experiences of discrimination, and stress exist among students in dentistry, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physical therapist professional education programs; (2) determine if there are significant differences by key demographic characteristics (those who are first-generation college students [FGCSs], a member of an underrepresented minority [URM] group, or both); and (3) highlight strategies and solutions to alleviate these challenges identified by students.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey using a mix of question types of a sample of graduate students from dentistry, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, and physical therapy programs from February to June 2020. Utilizing the Maslach Burnout Inventory Student Survey and campus climate and stress survey, mean subscale scores were calculated for the following outcomes of interest: MBI-SS burnout, dimensions of stress, and observed racism. Logistic regressions examined student factors that may help explain these outcomes. Content analysis examined participants' responses to open-ended questions.

RESULTS

There were 611 individuals who completed all survey questions. FGCSs were significantly more likely than non-FGCSs to report exhaustion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.50; 95% CI = 1.04-2.16), family stress (aOR: 3.11; 95% CI = 2.13-4.55), and financial stress (aOR: 1.74; 95% CI = 1.21-2.50). URM students reported not feeling supported in their program and mentioned needing additional support, particularly for well-being, from staff and faculty.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study are consistent with literature that FGCSs experience additional stressors that may lead to burnout and exhaustion. URM students reported not feeling supported in their programs. This study's findings point to the need for leadership and faculty of health professional schools to implement or strengthen current policies, practices, and strategies that support URM students and FGCSs.

IMPACT

Research demonstrates that a diverse student body and faculty enhances the educational experience for health professional students, and that diversity strengthens the learning environment and improves learning outcomes, preparing students to care for an increasingly diverse population. However, this study finds that students from underrepresented backgrounds may still experience more burnout, exhaustion, discrimination, and stress than their peers. Programs and policies to support URM students and FGCSs throughout their academic careers can help improve graduation and retention rates, leading to improved workforce diversity.

Front row seat: The role MMI assessors play in widening access to medical school

BACKGROUND

While many medical schools utilize the Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) to help select a diverse student body, we know little about MMI assessors' roles. Do MMI assessors carry unique insights on widening access (WA) to medical school? Herein we discuss the hidden expertise and insights that assessors contribute to the conversation around WA.

METHODS

Ten MMI assessors (1-10 years' experience) participated in semi-structured interviews exploring factors influencing equitable medical school recruitment. Given their thoughtfulness during initial interviews, we invited them for follow-up interviews to gain further insight into their perceived role in WA. Fourteen interviews were conducted and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Assessors expressed concerns with diversity in medicine; dissatisfaction with the status quo fueled their contributions to the selection process. Assessors advocated for greater diversity among the assessor pool, citing benefits for all students, not only those from underrepresented groups. They noted that good intentions were not enough and that medical schools can do more to include underrepresented groups' perspectives in the admissions process.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis reveals that MMI assessors are committed to WA and make thoughtful contributions to the selection process. A medical school selection process, inclusive of assessors' expertise is an important step in WA.

Experiences of racism of Black medical students and residents in Montréal: "I wear my stethoscope around my neck at all times"

Background

Black students and residents experience racism in medical school. This qualitative study documents Black students' and residents' experiences of racism using Critical Race Theory (CRT) and explores their coping mechanisms using the theatrical metaphor.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with four Black medical students and residents (two medical students and two residents) studying in Montréal and analyzed their experiences through counter-stories. We identified themes related to their experiences of racism during medical training and their coping mechanisms.

Results

Our analysis reveals these experiences of racism occur in academic and clinical settings (classes, internships, social interactions with peers, faculty, and patients, and through the curriculum), in the form of microaggressions. The analysis also indicates that Black students and residents try to cope with racism using a hyper-ritualization strategy to better fit in (e.g., clothing, behaviours).

Conclusion

Considering that Black students and residents experience various forms of racism (subtle or explicit) during their medical training, these findings urge us to increase awareness about racism of students, residents, teachers and health care workers in universities and teaching hospitals. Pathways to increase the representation of Black students and residents seem to be part of the solution, but improving the learning environment must be a priority to achieve racial justice in medical training in Québec.

Just-in-Time Strategies to Reduce the Effect of Interviewer Bias During Trainee Recruitment

Bias impacts all aspects of medical trainee applications, from grades to narrative reviews. Interviews provide an avenue to become acquainted with applicants beyond their written application, but even the most egalitarian interviewers are subject to implicit biases, including those who hold marginalized identities themselves. Simply building awareness around implicit bias is inadequate to reduce the effect. Here, 5 evidence-informed strategies are presented that can be implemented by faculty on-the-spot to mitigate the impact of implicit bias during the short interview interaction: individuation, mindfulness, perspective taking, stereotype replacement, and counter-stereotypic imaging. These strategies can be used by individual interviewers as one component of a comprehensive plan including institutional changes to promote more equitable recruitment processes.

Analyzing the Current State and Visibility of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives at Urology Residency Programs

OBJECTIVE

To analyze AUA urology residency program websites to determine visibility of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. There is growing interest in DEI initiatives by urology applicants, and in recent years, urology programs have invested in efforts to promote DEI.

METHODS

All ACGME-accredited urology residency program with a website were assessed. Military programs were excluded. A DEI Score Card was developed using published pillars of DEI, including five domains: departmental inclusion, pipeline growth, departmental education, community engagement, and faculty demographics. Program Doximity rank, address, and surrounding demographics were collected to determine predictors of investing in DEI.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one urology residency websites were included for analysis. Only 40.7% of programs referenced DEI on their webpage, and 21.4% offered funded mentorship opportunities. Department education and community engagement were the least popular initiatives. The Western, Northeastern, and North Central sections had the highest DEI total score with wide variation across domains. Mention of DEI was not associated with program's county-level social vulnerability or percent minority but was associated with being a top 50 program (OR=4.0; 95% CI 1.8, 8.9; P = .0007).

CONCLUSION

Less than half of academic urology programs' websites referenced DEI initiatives. Using a DEI score card, our study shows that investment in DEI varies widely by AUA section, and greater investment is positively correlated with program rank. Our DEI score card serves as a tool that programs can use to assess their current DEI investment, identify areas for improvement, and ensure existing initiatives are visible to applicants.

Investigating racial/ethnic differences in procedure experience in obstetrics & gynecology trainees at a single academic institution: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Discrimination is common in medical education. Resident physicians of races and ethnicities underrepresented in medicine experience daily discrimination which has been proven to negatively impact training. There is limited data on the impact of resident race/ethnicity on OB/GYN surgical training. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of race/ethnicity on procedural experience in OB/GYN training.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of graduated OB/GYN resident case logs from 2009 to 2019 was performed at a single urban academic institution. Self-reported race/ethnicity data was collected. Association between URM and non-URM were analyzed using t-tests. Trainees were categorized by self-reported race/ethnicity into underrepresented in medicine (URM) (Black, Hispanic, Native American) and non-URM (White, Asian).

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 84 residents: 19% URM (N = 16) and 79% non-URM (n = 66). Difference between URM and non-URM status and average case volume was analyzed using t-tests. There was no difference between non-URM and URM trainees and reported mean number of Total GYN (349 vs. 334, p = 0.31) and Total OB (624 vs. 597, P = 0.11) case logs. However, compared with non-URM, on average URM performed fewer Total procedures (1562 vs. 1469, P = 0.04). Analyzing individual procedures showed a difference in average number of abortions performed between URM and non-URM (76 vs. 53, P = 0.02). There were no other statistically significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This single institution study highlights potential differences in trainee experience by race/ethnicity. Larger national studies are warranted to further explore these differences to identify bias and discrimination, and to ensure equitable experience for all trainees.

Moral injury and the hidden curriculum in medical school: comparing the experiences of students underrepresented in medicine (URMs) and non-URMs

Underrepresented students in medicine (URM) have more negative perceptions of the medical school learning environment (LE), a phenomenon that can contribute to higher rates of burnout and attrition in these populations. The hidden curriculum (HC)-defined as a set of values informally conveyed to learners through clinical role-modeling-is a LE socialization construct that has been critically examined for its role in shaping students' professional identities. Yet differences in how URMs and non-URMs experience the HC remain underexplored. The study used a pragmatic approach that drew on elements of grounded theory and employed both deductive and inductive reasoning. Investigators conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 13 URM and 21 non-URM participants at a Bronx, NY medical school. Interviews examined student experiences and reactions to the HC. Both cohorts witnessed patient disparagement and mistreatment. However, from these encounters, URM participants expressed more moral injury-the adverse emotional consequence of feeling pressured to accept ideologically incongruent values. URMs were also more likely to describe resisting the HC. Differences in group reactions appeared to arise from URMs' identity resonance with patients' lived experiences. Participants across cohorts emphasized increasing URM recruitment as one step toward mitigating these circumstances. URM participants experienced more distress and offered more resistance to the HC relative to non-URMs. The etiology of these differential reactions may stem from relative barriers in negotiating personal and professional identities. As such, URMs' perceptions of the LE may be adversely impacted given their more negative interactions with the HC.

Bridging the gap: Understanding the barriers and facilitators to performance for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic medical students in the United Kingdom

INTRODUCTION

Differential attainment is a well-known phenomenon in medical education. Despite a strong impetus for institutions and researchers to move away from a 'student deficit model' when exploring the attainment gap, little attention has been given to understanding the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) medical students. Informed by the social construction of learning theory, this is the first national study to explore how multiple dimensions of the medical school environment impact academic performance of BAME undergraduate medical students across the UK.

METHODS

Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, the authors conducted a survey and facilitated three focus groups across medical schools in the UK between 2020-2021. Participants self-identified as being from BAME backgrounds. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, subsequently identifying inductive themes.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-two respondents completed the Phase 1 survey, and 17 participants participated in the Phase 2 focus groups. Although both survey and focus group participants identified facilitators to learning such as supportive relationships, students reported facing numerous barriers that they felt impeded their learning and performance. These barriers included limited access to educational resources, and undiversified curricula and medical school populations. Students also described both experiencing and witnessing various forms of racism throughout their educational journeys.

DISCUSSION

Students encountered various difficulties throughout their medical training that they felt impacted their learning and performance. This study offers novel insights into the experiences of BAME students and builds upon previous research. It also reveals the pervasive nature of racism within medical schools, highlighting the urgent need for institutional changes. Educators and institutions must go beyond merely recognising these barriers and facilitators; they must proactively innovate and adapt. In doing so, they pave the way for inclusive learning environments that truly foster a sense of belonging for BAME students.

Student-Led Webinar to Support LGBTQ+ Students Applying to Medical School During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, non-binary, two-spirit, and other (LGBTQ+) students are a diverse group with unique and frequently overlooked needs in medical training. The present study was designed to understand the concerns of LGBTQ+ applicants to medical school and examine the effectiveness of a webinar in alleviating concerns. Sixty participants joined webinars discussing the medical school application process with particular attention to concerns pertinent to the LGBTQ+ population. Pre and post surveys were administered to examine webinar effectiveness and participant concerns. Results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Pre-medical students reported that the webinar format was helpful for their application process. Specifically, pre- and post-test analyses revealed that the webinar increased both students' preparedness as well as their confidence in disclosing their LGBTQ+ identity or being "out" when applying to medical school. Student-led, online webinars increase LGBTQ+ students' confidence and help address SGM students' concerns about applying to medical school.

Differences in emergency medicine resident procedural reporting by race and ethnicity

Background

The recruitment, retention, and training of physicians from groups underrepresented in medicine (UiM) is critically important to the practice of emergency medicine (EM). Studies across specialties have demonstrated disparities in operative experiences among UiM resident learners who are UiM; however, there are limited data on procedural disparities in EM.

Objective

We sought to quantify the association between racial and ethnic identities that are UiM and the number of procedures reported among EM residents.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of procedural differences by UiM status (using self-identified race and ethnicity) among graduating EM residents at nine training programs over a 10-year period. Sites were selected to ensure diversity of program length, program type, and geography. Data from residents in combined training programs, those who did not complete their full training at that institution, and those with missing data or electing not to report race/ethnicity were excluded. We calculated median and interquartile ranges for each procedure by UiM status. We conducted multivariable regression analyses accounting for UiM status, gender, and site as well as a sensitivity analysis excluding values >3 standard deviations from the mean for each procedure.

Results

We collected data from 988 total residents, with 718 (73%) being non-UiM, 204 (21%) being UiM, 48 (5%) electing not to specific race/ethnicity, and 18 (2%) missing race/ethnicity data. While unadjusted data demonstrated a difference between UiM and non-UiM resident numbers across several procedures, there were no significant differences in procedures reported after accounting for gender and site in the primary or sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

We did not identify a statistically significant difference in reported procedures between UiM and non-UiM residents in EM. Future work should include qualitative investigations of UiM resident experience surrounding procedures as well as mixed-methods studies to examine how these data interact.

Quantitative Analysis of Challenges Encountered by UK Widening Participation Medical Students in Comparison With Their Non-Widening Participation Peers

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have captured the experiences of widening participation (WP) medical students, and none have compared their experiences to their non-WP peers. This study aims to identify which challenges WP students are more likely to face.

METHODS

A 22-item questionnaire was distributed to medical students across all UK medical schools. Students were asked yes or no questions on whether they faced challenges in finances, socializing, physical and mental health, academic attainment, and COVID19-related teaching changes.

RESULTS

One-hundred seventy-six medical students from all year groups across the UK responded, with 97 students from a WP background. WP students were significantly more likely to have their personal background impacting their mental health (OR = 2.65, WP  =  0.002), more than twice as likely to feel that their job impacted their studies (OR = 2.53, P ≤.05), more likely to feel limited by their financial situation (OR = 2.29, P≤.05) and to receive support from student finance (OR = 2.08, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

WP students were more likely to face challenges in mental health and finances in medical school compared to their peers. These findings, further informed by qualitative insights can aid in advancing equity in medical training.

Measuring wellbeing: A scoping review of metrics and studies measuring medical student wellbeing across multiple timepoints

PURPOSE

Studies have demonstrated poor mental health in medical students. However, there is wide variation in study design and metric use, impairing comparability. The authors aimed to examine the metrics and methods used to measure medical student wellbeing across multiple timepoints and identify where guidance is necessary.

METHODS

Five databases were searched between May and June 2021 for studies using survey-based metrics among medical students at multiple timepoints. Screening and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers. Data regarding the manuscript, methodology, and metrics were analyzed.

RESULTS

221 studies were included, with 109 observational and 112 interventional studies. There were limited studies (15.4%) focused on clinical students. Stress management interventions were the most common (40.2%). Few (3.57%) interventional studies followed participants longer than 12 months, and 38.4% had no control group. There were 140 unique metrics measuring 13 constructs. 52.1% of metrics were used only once.

CONCLUSIONS

Unique guidance is needed to address gaps in study design as well as unique challenges surrounding medical student wellbeing surveys. Metric use is highly variable and future research is necessary to identify metrics specifically validated in medical student samples that reflect the diversity of today's students.

"Should I Say Something?": A Simulation Curriculum on Addressing Lapses in Professionalism to Improve Patient Safety

Introduction

Medical students may witness lapses in professionalism but lack tools to effectively address such episodes. Current professionalism curricula lack opportunities to practice communication skills in addressing professionalism lapses.

Methods

We designed a simulation curriculum to introduce professionalism expectations, provide communication tools using elements of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality TeamSTEPPS program, and address observed professionalism lapses involving patient safety in hierarchical patient care teams. Students were surveyed on knowledge, skills, and attitude regarding professionalism before, immediately after, and 6 months after participation.

Results

Of 253 students, 70 (28%) completed baseline and immediate postsurveys, and 39 (15%) completed all surveys. In immediate postsurveys, knowledge of communication tools (82% to 94%, p = .003) and empowerment to address residents (19% to 44%, p = .001) and attendings (15% to 39%, p < .001) increased. At 6 months, 96% of students reported witnessing a professionalism lapse.

Discussion

The curriculum was successful in reported gains in knowledge of communication tools and empowerment to address professionalism lapses, but few students reported using the techniques to address witnessed lapses in real life.

URM: Underrepresented or Underrecognized? A Case Study of Black Pediatric Critical Care Physicians

PURPOSE

This study explored Black physicians' experience via an antideficit lens to gain new ideas for advancing minoritized physicians in academic medicine more broadly. Increasingly, systemic racism in academic medicine is intentionally acknowledged and named. However, many solutions to tackle racism and the overall paucity of Black physicians use a deficit framing, painting Black physicians and trainees as lacking preparation, interest, or experience and qualifications. Such solutions aim to help Black people assimilate into the "White Space" of academic medicine, rather than focusing on Black people's strengths.

METHOD

This qualitative study included 15 Black physicians and trainees in pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) from across the country who participated in semistructured interviews. Through an antideficit lens, the researchers examined the social, cultural, and structural contexts influencing the participants' individual experiences. They analyzed the data combining thematic and narrative qualitative analysis approaches, including restorying.

RESULTS

The data help promote understanding of the landscape and context in which Black PCCM physicians become successful. Achievement took on different forms for the participants. Participants described enablers of achievement that supported them through their individual journeys spanning 3 general domains-intrinsic, interpersonal, and systemic. Three additional enablers were tied specifically to participants' Black identities-harnessing Blackness as a superpower, leaning in to lead, and successfully navigating the "unwritten rules."

CONCLUSIONS

By using an antideficit framework, this study delineates and centers participants' ingenuity in cultivating repertoires of practice that enabled them to succeed, despite challenges rooted in systemic racism. Going forward, rather than focus solely on what is missing, academic medicine should try to shift systems and regularly recognize and value the knowledge, expertise, and merit Black that physicians bring. Perhaps an appropriate framing is not that Black physicians are underrepresented in medicine; maybe instead, it is that they are underrecognized.

Developing Evidence for Equitable Assessment Characteristics Based on Clinical Learner Preferences Using Discrete Choice Experiments

PURPOSE

Medical education is only beginning to explore the factors that contribute to equitable assessment in clinical settings. Increasing knowledge about equitable assessment ensures a quality medical education experience that produces an excellent, diverse physician workforce equipped to address the health care disparities facing patients and communities. Through the lens of the Anti-Deficit Achievement framework, the authors aimed to obtain evidence for a model for equitable assessment in clinical training.

METHOD

A discrete choice experiment approach was used which included an instrument with 6 attributes each at 2 levels to reveal learner preferences for the inclusion of each attribute in equitable assessment. Self-identified underrepresented in medicine (UIM) and not underrepresented in medicine (non-UIM) (N = 306) fourth-year medical students and senior residents in medicine, pediatrics, and surgery at 9 institutions across the United States completed the instrument. A mixed-effects logit model was used to determine attributes learners valued most.

RESULTS

Participants valued the inclusion of all assessment attributes provided except for peer comparison. The most valued attribute of an equitable assessment was how learner identity, background, and trajectory were appreciated by clinical supervisors. The next most valued attributes were assessment of growth, supervisor bias training, narrative assessments, and assessment of learner's patient care, with participants willing to trade off any of the attributes to get several others. There were no significant differences in value placed on assessment attributes between UIM and non-UIM learners. Residents valued clinical supervisors valuing learner identity, background, and trajectory and clinical supervisor bias training more so than medical students.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers support for the components of an antideficit-focused model for equity in assessment and informs efforts to promote UIM learner success and guide equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives in medical education.

Understanding the Experiences of American Indian and Alaska Native Students Enrolled in Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Degree Programs

PURPOSE

Despite a growing population, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) students have seen no meaningful increase in representation in allopathic and osteopathic medical degree programs. While AI/AN medical students are more likely to practice in underserved areas, they face financial and sociocultural obstacles towards doing so. This underscores the need to understand the experiences of these trainees, and identify barriers and facilitators to the successful recruitment, retention, and advancement of AI/AN trainees.

METHODS

A survey was administered to members of the Association of Native American Medical Students (ANAMS), an organization representing self-identified Native medical students. This survey elicited demographic information, opinions of institutional climate, and aspects of academic and social experiences during medical school.

RESULTS

There were n = 39 complete responses. Over fifty percent of respondents (n = 21) identified as AI/AN alone and not in combination with another racial or ethnic group. Overall, respondents were: Generally, not satisfied with their school's engagement with Native communities and AI/AN health curricula. Likely to report barriers towards their timely advancement in training, namely being a first-generation or low income student, and feelings of imposter syndrome. Likely to report an interest to work in primary care fields and serve AI/AN communities in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey identified several barriers to successful AI/AN medical trainee advancement, highlighting opportunities for institutions to foster inclusion of AI/AN trainees and grow the number of Native physicians.

Emotion, ethics, epistemology: What can shame 'do' in medical education?

BACKGROUND

Recent empirical studies have described and theorized a culture of shame within medical education in the Anglo-American context (Bynum). Shame is universal and highly social human emotion characterized by a sense of feeling objectified and judged negatively, in contrast to one's own self-concept. Shame has both an embodied and a relational dimension. Shame is considered especially relevant in healthcare settings (Dolezal and Lyons), and the tenets of patient care within the medical profession include respecting the dignity and upholding the safety of patients. However, shame is frequently deployed as a teaching tool within medical training.

METHOD

Here I ask, what can shame do in medical education (Ahmed)? What epistemic and relational conditions does it construct? I draw from philosophical voices in higher education to illuminate how shaming practices in medical education can undermine dignity safety (Callan), preclude inclusivity, and in the context of the hierarchical and marginalizing medical system, propagate epistemic injustice (Fricker).

DISCUSSION

This argument shows how shame in education can be both phenomenologically and normatively problematic and may act differently upon students who experience marginalization and those who are majoritized. I further suggest that a medical education system which upholds the epistemological and relational frameworks of power, shame, and epistemic injustice, underscores those frameworks in the medical system at large, disserving individual patients who are already at risk of suffering epistemic injustice (Carel), and society at large.

CONCLUSION

This analysis of shame in medical education focuses on the highly relational and interpersonal elements of learning to live and work in the medical system, highlighting the need for respect, trust, and resistance to reorient the relational learning environment toward individual and systemic forms of justice.

The Problematic Persistence of Tiered Grading in Medical School

Issue: The evaluation of medical students is a critical, complex, and controversial process. It is tightly woven into the medical school curriculum, beginning at the inception of the medical student's professional journey. In this respect, medical student evaluation is among the first in a series of ongoing, lifelong assessments that influence the interpersonal, ethical, and socioeconomic dimensions necessary for an effective physician workforce. Yet, tiered grading has a questionable historic pedagogic basis in American medical education, and evidence suggests that tiered grading itself is a source of student burnout, anxiety, depression, increased competitiveness, reduced group cohesion, and racial biases. Evidence: In its most basic form, medical student evaluation is an assessment of the initial cognitive and technical competencies ultimately needed for the safe and effective practice of contemporary medicine. At many American medical schools, such evaluation relies largely on norm-based comparisons, such as tiered grading. Yet, tiered grading can cause student distress, is considered unfair by most students, is associated with biases against under-represented minorities, and demonstrates inconsistent correlation with residency performance. While arguments that tiered grading motivates student performance have enjoyed historic precedence in academia, such arguments are not supported by robust data or theories of motivation. Implications: Given the evolving recognition of the deleterious effects on medical student mental health, cohesiveness, and diversity, the use of tiered grading in medical schools to measure or stimulate academic performance, or by residency program directors to distinguish residency applicants, remains questionable. Examination of tiered grading in its historical, psychometric, psychosocial, and moral dimensions and the various arguments used to maintain it reveals a need for investigation of, if not transition to, alternative and non-tiered assessments of our medical students.

Variation in Experiences and Attainment in Surgery Between Ethnicities of UK Medical Students and Doctors (ATTAIN): Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The unequal distribution of academic and professional outcomes between different minority groups is a pervasive issue in many fields, including surgery. The implications of differential attainment remain significant, not only for the individuals affected but also for the wider health care system. An inclusive health care system is crucial in meeting the needs of an increasingly diverse patient population, thereby leading to better outcomes. One barrier to diversifying the workforce is the differential attainment in educational outcomes between Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) and White medical students and doctors in the United Kingdom. BME trainees are known to have lower performance rates in medical examinations, including undergraduate and postgraduate exams, Annual Review of Competence Progression, as well as training and consultant job applications. Studies have shown that BME candidates have a higher likelihood of failing both parts of the Membership of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons exams and are 10% less likely to be considered suitable for core surgical training. Several contributing factors have been identified; however, there has been limited evidence investigating surgical training experiences and their relationship to differential attainment. To understand the nature of differential attainment in surgery and to develop effective strategies to address it, it is essential to examine the underlying causes and contributing factors. The Variation in Experiences and Attainment in Surgery Between Ethnicities of UK Medical Students and Doctors (ATTAIN) study aims to describe and compare the factors and outcomes of attainment between different ethnicities of doctors and medical students.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim will be to compare the effect of experiences and perceptions of surgical education of students and doctors of different ethnicities.

METHODS

This protocol describes a nationwide cross-sectional study of medical students and nonconsultant grade doctors in the United Kingdom. Participants will complete a web-based questionnaire collecting data on experiences and perceptions of surgical placements as well as self-reported academic attainment data. A comprehensive data collection strategy will be used to collect a representative sample of the population. A set of surrogate markers relevant to surgical training will be used to establish a primary outcome to determine variations in attainment. Regression analyses will be used to identify potential causes for the variation in attainment.

RESULTS

Data collected between February 2022 and September 2022 yielded 1603 respondents. Data analysis is yet to be competed. The protocol was approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee on September 16, 2021 (ethics approval reference 19071/004). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CONCLUSIONS

Drawing upon the conclusions of this study, we aim to make recommendations on educational policy reforms. Additionally, the creation of a large, comprehensive data set can be used for further research.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/40545.

Intersectional Identities: Making Sense of Skill Development on Clinical Placements

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the influence of personal experiences on learners' trajectories toward mastery. Newell's theory of constraints articulates the relationship between environmental, individual, and task-related factors for skill development. This study explores how undergraduate pharmacy students experience skill development on placements and what the barriers and facilitators are within Newell's framework.

METHODS

Year 3 undergraduate pharmacy students were invited to take part in focus groups exploring Newell's theory relative to skill development. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using an interpretive phenomenological approach.

RESULTS

Five focus groups were conducted with 16 students. The placement task provided structure through entrustable professional activities (EPAs). The resulting skill development varied but included EPA expected behaviors and also skills for mastery, eg, self-reflection. Students' personal identities acted as both barriers and facilitators. For example, expecting or experiencing racial microaggressions limited participation; having a local accent facilitated rapport with patients. Students worked toward integration into the community of practice (the ward), where the staff was critical to inclusion. Where students had barriers related to their identities, they found it more difficult to access the community of practice.

CONCLUSION

Factors related to the community of practice (environment), students' identities (individual), and the EPA behaviors (task) can influence skill development during placement. For some students, these factors will be more prevalent, and elements of their identities may intersect and conflict, acting as both barriers and facilitators to skill development. Educators can consider the influence of intersectionality on student identity when designing and preparing new placements and assessing students.

Incongruous identities: Mental distress and burnout disparities in LGBTQ+ health care professional populations

Health care professionals are chronically overworked due to structural workplace demands and institutional challenges [1]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, US biomedical health care professionals experienced additional environmental strain [2]. Health care professionals who occupy socio-politically minoritized identities are more likely to report symptoms of distress and workplace overburden than their counterparts [2]. While minority stress and identity formation theories explain the relationship between socially constructed identity and environmental strain, these theories remain largely unexplored in LGBTQ+ health care professional populations. Furthermore, contemporary investigations into health care professional burnout and mental distress fail to include differential impacts of identity-based stress, particularly within LGBTQ+ groups. This paper proposes a theoretical explanation for differential stress experiences by health care professionals and calls for research to investigate identity congruence as a key aspect of professionalization in medical schools. Health professions researchers need to attend to identity-based stress models to address discriminatory experiences with burnout and mental distress.

The Hidden Burden: Qualitative Differences in How URiM Students Experience the Clinical Microenvironment

INTRODUCTION

It is well documented that medical students who identify as underrepresented in medicine are more likely to encounter social challenges in the clinical environment. Successful navigation of these challenges requires a social and emotional agility that is unmeasured in traditional metrics of success. The effects of this requirement has not yet been explored. The authors therefore set out to investigate the variations in experiences that exist between underrepresented minority students in medicine (URiM) and white students, and to determine if there was a difference in the quantitative performance evaluations applied to both groups of students.

METHODS

This was a mixed-methods study. In the quantitative portion, the authors retrospectively analyzed the standardized patient encounter scores of medical students from a single medical school in Michigan during the years of 2016 to 2018. The authors used multivariable ordinary least squares regression models to evaluate the differences in scores by race. In the qualitative portion, students volunteered to be interviewed and self-identified their race and gender. The authors employed semi-structured interview techniques to gather information about how the student felt their cultural or ethnic background affected their experience in the clinical environment.

RESULTS

For the quantitative portion of this study, the authors analyzed the scores of 534 students over 4 different standardized patient encounters. The average score across all 4 standardized patient encounters was 88.7 (SD=5.6). The average score across all 4 standardized patient encounters for white students was 89 (SD=5.3), Black 87.9 (SD=7.4) Twenty-four students participated in the semi-structured interviews. Participants described feeling that the way their assessors interacted with them was largely affected by their race or gender. They also described feeling tension between how they would usually express themselves and how they were expected to in the clinical environment. When probed further, participants described various methods of adaptation to this tension including changing their hair or natural style of speech and modifying their perception of their role in the clinical environment.

Barriers and opportunities for promoting health professions careers among African American students in the Midwest

The purpose of our study is to examine the barriers and facilitators for urban African American students interested in pursuing health professions careers in the Midwest. In our analysis of the key informant interviews and focus groups, we identified four barriers (lack of preparation, lack of funding, lack of support/isolation, and perceived discrimination) and three facilitators (early preparation, support/mentorship, funding). We provide recommendations for how to leverage these facilitators and address the barriers to increase the representation of African Americans in the healthcare workforce. Novel future directions for this work should include comprehensive interventions tailored to URM students that span the health professions education pipeline and begin as early as elementary school. Interventions that engage mentors should take place at high school, undergraduate, and graduate health professions school levels.

Bringing Needed Change to Medical Student Well-Being: A Call to Expand Accreditation Requirements

Issue: Noting high rates of burnout, depression, and suicidality among medical students, academic medical communities are trying to identify preventive and curricular measures that protect and promote student well-being. To date, the effectiveness of these efforts is unclear. In addition, evidence increasingly suggests that the major drivers of distress appear to be factors within the social, learning, and work environments. Specific to medical schools in the United States, neither the Liaison Committee on Medical Education nor the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation include accreditation standards regarding well-being curricula and, as such, these curricula are not well-integrated into students' medical school experience. Current accreditation standards also do not specifically require institutions to assess or address systemic factors of the learning environment that negatively affect student well-being. Evidence: This paper proposes expanding current Liaison Committee on Medical Education and Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation standards on professionalism to incorporate well-being as a core component of professional identity formation by requiring individual and institutional-level actions. Proposed changes to accreditation standards include (1) institutional assessment of the impact of the learning environment on student well-being; (2) continuous quality improvement efforts to address structural factors associated with student well-being and modification of practices that impair student well-being; and (3) integrated curriculum with related assessment to educate students on empirically-supported strategies for well-being. Implications: Refining undergraduate medical education accreditation standards in the United States to include language specific to student well-being will facilitate long overdue changes to the learning environment. In the end, the goal is not just to improve medical student well-being, but to provide a workforce better equipped for a sustainable and meaningful career.

The time is now: addressing implicit bias in obstetrics and gynecology education

Obstetrician-gynecologists can improve the learning environment and patient care by addressing implicit bias. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that racial and gender-based discrimination is woven into medical education, formal curricula, patient-provider-trainee interactions in the clinical workspace, and all aspects of learner assessment. Implicit bias negatively affects learners in every space. Strategies to address implicit bias at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, and structural level to improve the well-being of learners and patients are needed. The authors review an approach to addressing implicit bias in obstetrics and gynecology education, which includes: (1) curricular design using an educational framework of antiracism and social justice theories, (2) bias awareness and management pedagogy throughout the curriculum, (3) elimination of stereotypical patient descriptions from syllabi and examination questions, and (4) critical review of epidemiology and evidence-based medicine for underlying assumptions based on discriminatory practices or structural racism that unintentionally reinforce stereotypes and bias. The movement toward competency-based medical education and holistic evaluations may result in decreased bias in learner assessment. Educators may wish to monitor grades and narratives for bias as a form of continuous educational equity improvement. Given that practicing physicians may have little training in this area, faculty development efforts in bias awareness and mitigation strategies may have significant impact on learner well-being.

Revisiting the Exhibits-Medical Student Reflections on Changes to the Institutional Portraiture at a US Medical School

BACKGROUND

Yale School of Medicine's (YSM) Sterling Hall of Medicine (SHM) has historically been lined with large oil paintings of mostly White men, despite over a century of Black and female enrollment. These spaces can be seen as exclusionary to students underrepresented in medicine, and may result in decreased well-being and adversely affect academic performance. Student-led activism has resulted in recent changes to these walls, including the addition of images of women faculty, and artwork by students, faculty, and staff.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate how recent changes to longstanding historical portraiture in SHM affected students' reflections on being in that space.

DESIGN

This was a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews conducted virtually.

PARTICIPANTS

Second- to fourth-year YSM medical students were interviewed.

APPROACH

Qualitative interviews were used to gauge students' impressions of how they perceived both the original and updated artwork and portraiture, as well as the overall physical environment.

KEY RESULTS

Nine interviews were conducted, with interviewees describing the portraiture as reflective of YSM's institutional values. They related this to other aspects of an exclusionary environment, and noted that they created belonging at YSM within smaller communities. Students recognized and expressed appreciation for the changes to the portraiture, particularly the increase in diverse representation, and they noted stark contrasts to the prior space. While they describe positive attitudes regarding changes in SHM's exhibited portraiture and art, they also expressed skepticism about whether these changes were performative or whether they reflected true commitment to reform.

CONCLUSIONS

This study depicts how the portraiture and physical environment of a medical school affects medical students, and that interventions to reform institutional portraiture can have considerable impact on students' attitudes regarding their medical school experiences.

Redressing injustices: how women students enact agency in undergraduate medical education

This study presents descriptions of epistemic injustice in the experiences of women medical students and provides accounts about how these students worked to redress these injustices. Epistemic injustice is both the immediate discrediting of an individual's knowledge based on their social identity and the act of persistently ignoring possibilities for other ways of knowing. Using critical narrative interviews and personal reflections over an eight-month period, 22 women students during their first year of medical school described instances when their knowledge and experience was discredited and ignored, then the ways they enacted agency to redress these injustices. Participants described three distinct ways they worked to redress injustices: reclaiming why they belong in medicine, speaking up and calling out the curriculum, and uplifting one another. This study has implications for recognizing medical students as whole individuals with lived histories and experiences and advocates for recognizing medical students' perspectives as valuable sources of knowledge.

Association Between Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Medical Specialties and Residency Application Rates

IMPORTANCE

The lack of racial and ethnic diversity in the US medical profession is a well-recognized problem, and racial and ethnic representation is highly variable across the medical specialties. Residency selection is a crucial juncture at which diversity and representation in specialties can be increased.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with residency application rates for medical specialties by race and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This national cross-sectional study of medical student residency applications used American Association of Medical Colleges data on 2019-2020 applicants and information about the racial and ethnic characteristics of practicing physicians (including medical school faculty) and department chairs. A total of 26 320 applicants to medical residency programs, 592 296 practicing physicians, and 2121 department chairs across the US were included. Residency application rates for 18 medical specialties were evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was the specialty representation quotient (SRQ), which estimated the extent to which students from a racial or ethnic group were overrepresented (an SRQ >1) or underrepresented (an SRQ <1) in a given specialty compared with the racial and ethnic demographic characteristics of the corresponding graduating class. Covariates included the racial and ethnic demographic characteristics of practicing physicians and department chairs by specialty based on American Association of Medical Colleges data and student academic factors (mean United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 score, number of research experiences, and AΩA honor society membership among matched students from the previous application cycle). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between these covariates and application rates by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Among 26 320 specialty-specific applications to medical residency programs in 18 specialties, 90 (0.3%) were from American Indian or Alaska Native students, 6718 (25.5%) were from Asian students, 2575 (9.8%) were from Black students, 1896 (7.2%) were from Hispanic students, and 15 041 (57.1%) were from White students. Among 592 296 practicing physicians, 2777 (0.5%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 117 358 (19.8%) were Asian, 36 639 (6.2%) were Black, 41 071 (6.9%) were Hispanic, and 394 451 (66.6%) were White. Among 2121 department chairs, 5 (0.2%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 212 (10.0%) were Asian, 86 (4.1%) were Black, 88 (4.1%) were Hispanic, and 1730 (81.6%) were White. The specialties with the greatest representation among applicants from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine (URM) were family medicine (SRQ, 1.70), physical medicine and rehabilitation (SRQ, 1.60), and obstetrics and gynecology (SRQ, 1.47). The specialties with the lowest URM representation among applicants were plastic surgery (SRQ, 0.47), otolaryngology (SRQ, 0.53), and orthopedic surgery (SRQ, 0.86). Membership in AΩA was negatively associated with SRQ among American Indian or Alaska Native students only (β = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.05; P = .002). Racial and ethnic representation among practicing physicians was positively associated with SRQ for American Indian or Alaska Native students (β = 6.05; 95% CI, 4.26-7.85; P < .001), Asian students (β = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.06-0.09; P < .001), Black students (β = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.15; P < .001), and URM students overall (β = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.08; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study's findings suggest that the propensity of medical students, particularly those from racial and ethnic minority groups, to apply to a given specialty for residency was associated with the representation of their racial or ethnic group among the specialty's practicing physicians. Future work to characterize the mechanisms of occupational sorting may guide interventions to improve equity within the physician workforce.

The quest for greater equity: a national cross-sectional study of the experiences of Black Canadian medical students

BACKGROUND

Black medical students have been consistently underrepresented in Canadian medical schools, and data on the impact of discrimination on their medical education remain limited. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the experiences of Black medical students through the Black Medical Students' Association of Canada (BMSAC).

METHODS

We developed a 63-item instrument around the domains of inclusion and diversity, wellness, discrimination, career advancement and diversity in medical education. The anonymous web-based questionnaire was sent to 128 medical students and first-year residents from all 17 Canadian medical schools via the BMSAC listserv. We obtained frequencies for demographic data and self-reported experiences.

RESULTS

We received 52 responses. Of respondents, 59% had at least 1 personal encounter with discrimination in medical school. Discrimination was experienced in both clinical and academic contexts, notably from patients, peers and hospital staff. Students further along in their medical training were more likely to endorse having experienced discrimination in medical school. Most respondents had positive experiences with academic and clinical inclusion, as well as resiliency in the face of discrimination. However, most respondents had negative experiences relating to reporting discrimination, their well-being, career advancement, sentiments of minority tax and low diversity in medical education.

INTERPRETATION

We found that discrimination has important implications on the learning experiences of Black medical students surveyed from the BMSAC. This directly challenges the notion that Canadian medical schools are impervious to racism and highlights the need for advocacy and systemic changes to eliminate institutional racism.

Association of Sociodemographic Characteristics With US Medical Student Attrition

Importance

Diversity in the medical workforce is critical to improve health care access and achieve equity for resource-limited communities. Despite increased efforts to recruit diverse medical trainees, there remains a large chasm between the racial and ethnic and socioeconomic composition of the patient population and that of the physician workforce.

Objective

To analyze student attrition from medical school by sociodemographic identities.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included allopathic doctor of medicine (MD)-only US medical school matriculants in academic years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The analysis was performed from July to September 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was attrition, defined as withdrawal or dismissal from medical school for any reason. Attrition rate was explored across 3 self-reported marginalized identities: underrepresented in medicine (URiM) race and ethnicity, low income, and underresourced neighborhood status. Logistic regression was assessed for each marginalized identity and intersections across the 3 identities.

Results

Among 33 389 allopathic MD-only medical school matriculants (51.8% male), 938 (2.8%) experienced attrition from medical school within 5 years. Compared with non-Hispanic White students (423 of 18 213 [2.3%]), those without low income (593 of 25 205 [2.3%]), and those who did not grow up in an underresourced neighborhood (661 of 27 487 [2.4%]), students who were URiM (Hispanic [110 of 2096 (5.2%); adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.77], non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander [13 of 118 (11.0%); aOR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.76-5.80], and non-Hispanic Black/African American [120 of 2104 (5.7%); aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.77]), those who had low income (345 of 8184 [4.2%]; aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.15-1.54), and those from an underresourced neighborhood (277 of 5902 [4.6%]; aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16-1.58) were more likely to experience attrition from medical school. The rate of attrition from medical school was greatest among students with all 3 marginalized identities (ie, URiM, low income, and from an underresourced neighborhood), with an attrition rate 3.7 times higher than that among students who were not URiM, did not have low income, and were not from an underresourced neighborhood (7.3% [79 of 1086] vs 1.9% [397 of 20 353]; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

This retrospective cohort study demonstrated a significant association of medical student attrition with individual (race and ethnicity and family income) and structural (growing up in an underresourced neighborhood) measures of marginalization. The findings highlight a need to retain students from marginalized groups in medical school.

Association Between Resident Race and Ethnicity and Clinical Performance Assessment Scores in Graduate Medical Education

PURPOSE

To assess the association between internal medicine (IM) residents' race/ethnicity and clinical performance assessments.

METHOD

The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of clinical performance assessment scores at 6 U.S. IM residency programs from 2016 to 2017. Residents underrepresented in medicine (URiM) were identified using self-reported race/ethnicity. Standardized scores were calculated for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. Cross-classified mixed-effects regression assessed the association between race/ethnicity and competency scores, adjusting for rotation time of year and setting; resident gender, postgraduate year, and IM In-Training Examination percentile rank; and faculty gender, rank, and specialty.

RESULTS

Data included 3,600 evaluations by 605 faculty of 703 residents, including 94 (13.4%) URiM residents. Resident race/ethnicity was associated with competency scores, with lower scores for URiM residents (difference in adjusted standardized scores between URiM and non-URiM residents, mean [standard error]) in medical knowledge (-0.123 [0.05], P = .021), systems-based practice (-0.179 [0.05], P = .005), practice-based learning and improvement (-0.112 [0.05], P = .032), professionalism (-0.116 [0.06], P = .036), and interpersonal and communication skills (-0.113 [0.06], P = .044). Translating this to a 1 to 5 scale in 0.5 increments, URiM resident ratings were 0.07 to 0.12 points lower than non-URiM resident ratings in these 5 competencies. The interaction with faculty gender was notable in professionalism (difference between URiM and non-URiM for men faculty -0.199 [0.06] vs women faculty -0.014 [0.07], P = .01) with men more than women faculty rating URiM residents lower than non-URiM residents. Using the 1 to 5 scale, men faculty rated URiM residents 0.13 points lower than non-URiM residents in professionalism.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident race/ethnicity was associated with assessment scores to the disadvantage of URiM residents. This may reflect bias in faculty assessment, effects of a noninclusive learning environment, or structural inequities in assessment.

Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive but least diverse surgical specialties, with ever-increasing academic achievements (such as test scores) shown by applicants. Prior research shows that white applicants had higher United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores as well as higher odds of Alpha Omega Alpha status compared with Black, Hispanic, and other applicant groups. Yet, it still remains unknown whether differences in application metrics by race/ethnicity sufficiently explain the underrepresentation of certain racial or ethnic minority groups in orthopaedic residency programs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this study, we sought to determine (1) the relative weight of academic variables for admission into orthopaedic residency, and (2) whether race and gender are independently associated with admission into an orthopedic residency.

METHODS

The Electronic Residency Application System (ERAS) data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) of first-time MD applicants (n = 8966) for orthopaedic surgery residency positions in the United States and of admitted orthopaedic residents (n = 6218) from 2005 to 2014 were reviewed. This dataset is the first and most comprehensive of its kind to date in orthopaedic surgery. Academic metrics, such as USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, number of publications, Alpha Omega Alpha status, volunteer experiences, work experience, as well as race and gender, were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression models. The first model analyzed the association of academic metrics with admission into orthopaedic residency. In the second model, we added race and gender and controlled for metrics of academic performance. To determine how well the models simulated the actual admissions data, we computed the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) including the area under curve (AUC), which measures the model's ability to simulate which applicants were admitted or not admitted, with an AUC = 1.0 representing a perfect simulation. The odds ratio and confidence interval of each variable were computed.

RESULTS

When only academic variables were analyzed in the first model, Alpha Omega Alpha status (odds ratio 2.12 [95% CI 1.80 to 2.50]; p < 0.001), the USMLE Step 1 score (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.04]; p < 0.001), the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge score (OR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.02]; p < 0.001), publication count (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.05]; p < 0.001), and volunteer experience (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.04]; p < 0.001) were associated with admissions into orthopaedics while work and research experience were not. This model yielded a good prediction of the results with an AUC of 0.755. The second model, in which the variables of race and gender were added to the academic variables, also had a good prediction of the results with an AUC of 0.759. This model indicates that applicant race, but not gender, is associated with admissions into orthopaedic residency. Applicants from Asian (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.92]), Black (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.51 to 0.77], Hispanic (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.65]), or other race groups (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.55 to 0.77]) had lower odds of admission into residency compared with white applicants.

CONCLUSION

Minority applicants, but not women, have lower odds of admission into orthopaedic surgery residency, even when accounting for academic performance metrics. Changes in the residency selection processes are needed to eliminate the lower admission probability of qualified minority applicants in orthopaedic residency and to improve the diversity and inclusion of orthopaedic surgery. Changes including increasing the diversity of the selection committee, bias training, blinding applications before review, removal of metrics with history of racial disparities from an interviewer's candidate profile before an interview, and use of holistic application review (where an applicants' experiences, attributes, and academic metrics are all considered) can improve the diversity landscape in training. In addition, cultivating an environment of inclusion will be necessary to address these long-standing trends in orthopaedic surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Race, but not gender, is associated with the odds of acceptance into orthopaedic surgery residency despite equivalent academic metrics. Changes in residency selection processes are suggested to eliminate the lower admission probability of qualified minority applicants into orthopaedic residency and to improve the diversity and inclusion of orthopaedic surgery.