Safety and efficacy of epidural analgesia

Ultrasonography-guided catheter-over-needle insertion for caudal epidural catheter placement in adults: technical considerations

BACKGROUND

Caudal epidural analgesia significantly reduces acute pain after anorectal surgery; however, caudal epidural catheter placement (CECP) remains challenging, and the safety of real-time ultrasonography-guided CECP is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the success rate and related complications of real-time ultrasonography-guided CECP and describe the technical considerations.

METHODS

This prospective, single-center observational study included 233 patients catheterized in the left lateral decubitus position. The sacral hiatus was palpated and then confirmed using ultrasonography. A catheter-over-needle was inserted through the sacrococcygeal ligament under real-time ultrasonographic guidance, the metallic needle was withdrawn through the outer sleeve, and the epidural catheter was placed through the outer sleeve into the sacral canal epidural space. The primary outcome was the success rate of CECP; several surgical variables, the incidence of related complications, and improvement measures were also assessed.

RESULTS

CECP through the sacral hiatus was successful in 231 patients. The sacral canal depth at the hiatus apex, the mean distance between the sacral cornua, and the distance from the skin to the inferior margin of the sacrococcygeal ligament were 5.07 ± 1.38, 8.00 ± 1.94, and 14.24 ± 4.18 mm, respectively. The sacral canal depth was > 3 mm in 94.4% of patients. No complications, such as epidural hematoma, dura puncture, and intraspinal infection during postoperative epidural catheter utilization, occurred.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography-guided CECP through the sacral hiatus is a simple, feasible, safe, and effective technique for postoperative anorectal analgesia. Additionally, caudal epidural analgesia manages severe pain after anorectal surgery. Therefore, this technology merits comprehensive clinical application.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

No. ChiCTR 2,000,038,918.

Epidural Analgesia for End-of-Life Pain

Objectives: While epidural anesthesia is an established technique for labor and perioperative pain, its use in the hospice setting remains limited, resulting in a reliance on oral opioids. We describe patients with intractable pain who pursued hospice enrollment with tunneled epidural analgesia for pain management. Methods: All patients who received a tunneled epidural prior to hospice enrollment between January 1, 2017, and September 20, 2023, were included. The medication infused, adverse effects, as well as changes in oral morphine equivalents (OME), pain scores, blood pressure, and heart rate were extracted from the medical record. Results: Seven patients underwent tunneled epidural placement for pain management. The average change in OME was -122.73 mg. Conclusions: Overall, tunneled epidural analgesia may be an underutilized method of pain management for patients at end-of-life with intractable pain. Further high-quality research on the subject is necessary to establish effectiveness, safety, and barriers to implementation.

Epidural injection of hydromorphone for postoperative pain after episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial

Perineal incision resulting in post-partum pain and impact on puerperal life was the focus of our study. We recruited postpartum mothers who had undergone vaginal delivery to receive labor analgesia and episiotomy with an epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone to assess the therapeutic effects of postpartum analgesia. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the control group (Group NS) received an epidural injection of an equal amount of saline, while the study group (Group HY) received an epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone. We collected relevant data from electronic medical records to compare the differences between the two groups. The intervention group demonstrated lower pain scores at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, a higher number of patients in the control group required pain medication (7 (15.9%) compared to 2 (4.7%)). The time to first analgesia request in group NS was earlier than that in group HY (8.94 ± 1.27 h compared to 16.96 ± 3.38 h). The study group experienced higher rates of vomiting (P = 0.002) and itching (P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of urinary retention, dyskinesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, or neonatal feeding. The epidural injection of 0.5 mg hydromorphone proved to be effective in alleviating pain caused by maternal episiotomy and did not negatively affect neonatal feeding.Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx identifier: ChiCTR2200064687.

Bilateral erector spinae plane block by multiple injection for pain control in pseudomyxoma peritonei surgery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the primary surgical treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The perioperative period is frequently accompanied by severe pain. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can enhance analgesia for abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of bilateral multiple-injection ESPB in patients with PMP.

METHODS

Fifty patients with PMP were randomly divided into two groups: the ESPB combined with general anesthesia group (Group E) and the general anesthesia alone group (Group C). Prior to the induction, patients in Group E underwent ESPB at the T7 and T11 levels. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during rest at 6 h post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, time for first rescue analgesia, frequency distribution of rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, adverse events associated with ESPB.

RESULTS

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores in Group E were significantly lower compared to Group C at immediate post-extubation (1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.008), and at 2 (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.001), 4 (2.4 ± 1.5 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.001), and 6 h (2.7 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.004) post-extubation during rest. Similarly, the VAS scores in Group E were significantly lower than those in Group C at immediate post-extubation (3.0 ± 1.4 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), and at 2 (3.8 ± 1.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.4, P = 0.019), 4 (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.5, P < 0.001), and 6 h (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.3, P = 0.004) post-extubation during movement. In Group E, the intraoperative remifentanil administration (2319.3 ± 1089.5 vs. 2984.6 ± 796.1, P = 0.017) and the amount of rescue analgesia within 2 h post-extubation (0 vs. 4, P = 0.037) were significantly less than in Group C, and the first rescue analgesia time was shorter as well (231.4 ± 147.5 vs. 668.8 ± 416.7, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to general anesthesia alone, bilateral multiple-injection ESPB with 0.2% ropivacaine can enhance analgesia and reduce opioid administration in patients with PMP. However, the duration of analgesia with ESPB is relatively short due to the low concentration of the local anesthetic used.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300069504, 20/03/2023.

Efficacy of locoregional analgesic techniques after laparotomy for gynecologic cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine which locoregional techniques are effective in managing post-operative pain in major open oncologic gynecologic surgery in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption when epidural analgesia is not a feasible option.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature, based on the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted. The ROB-2 assessment was used to assess bias. The primary outcomes were opioid consumption and post-operative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included post-operative markers such as time to mobilization and bowel movement.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies (n=714) were included in the analysis. Eight studies had a low risk of bias. Five different forms of locoregional analgesia were described. Eight studies compared with placebo and one study compared rectus sheath block with epidural analgesia. Three of the five studies investigating transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks showed an improvement in pain scores and opioid consumption when compared with the placebo group. One study investigating rectus sheath blocks and another investigating paravertebral blocks demonstrated significantly less opioid consumption and improved pain scores at certain time points. The studies investigating continuous wound infiltration and superior hypogastric plexus block found no significant effect. No adverse effects of locoregional anesthesia were found.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TAP blocks, rectus sheath blocks, and paravertebral blocks may decrease opioid consumption and improve pain scores in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery for gynecologic cancer. Additionally, these techniques might serve as a viable alternative for patients with contraindications to epidural analgesia.

Effect of different concentrations of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine on epidural fever during labor: A single-center retrospective study

Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) is associated with increased maternal body temperature; however, the responsible mechanism is unknown. Recent studies suggest that changes in EA affect the incidence of fever and that epidural sufentanil supplementation enhances analgesia and reduces the amount of local anesthetic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine on intrapartum fever during delivery. We performed a retrospective study comparing maternal fever rates in patients receiving labor analgesia between December 2018 and January 2019. Each patient receiving different concentrations of sufentanil in their EA received either proposal H (0.08% ropivacaine + 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil) or proposal L (0.08% ropivacaine + 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil), with the same nulliparous status. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever, which was defined as any temperature ≥ 38°C during labor using Fisher exact test. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, birth events, and neonatal outcomes. We observed a perinatal fever incidence rate of 11.7% in the group receiving proposal L, while the incidence rate was 19.8% in the group receiving proposal H (P = .001). Five hours after administration, the average body temperature of the puerpera decreased significantly in the proposal L group compared with proposal H group. In addition, treatment with 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil provided satisfactory pain relief during labor, shortened the first stage of labor and total labor time, reduced oxytocin use, and had no significant adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. EA may increase the risk of intrapartum epidural-associated fever. Compared with the 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil group, the 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil group can provide better analgesia and improve maternal fever. These retrospective results highlighted the importance of prospective and mechanistic studies of maternal fever associated with intraspinal analgesia.

Efficacy and safety of epidural block with lidocaine for refractory severe plaque psoriasis: An open-label pilot study in real world setting

Epidural block using lidocaine, a non-selective blocker of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav), has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of severe plaque psoriasis in a limited number of cases. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of epidural lidocaine block in adult patients with severe, treatment-resistant plaque psoriasis. This was an open-label pilot study. Patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis unresponsive to at least one systemic treatment were enrolled for a 1-week epidural lidocaine block and followed up for 48 weeks. Thirty-six patients participated, with 32 completing the study. At the 12-week mark, there was a remarkable 59% improvement in the mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score (P < 0.001). By week 48, 28 out of 32 patients (87%) achieved PASI 75, while 18 out of 32 (56%) reached PASI 90. Within 7 days, 20 out of 21 patients (95%) reported a reduction in itch, with a mean itch reduction of 82% at day 1 and 94% at day 7. Notably, no severe side effects were observed. Epidural lidocaine block proved to be an effective and safe long-term treatment option for individuals with refractory severe plaque psoriasis.

Comparison of different interventions for the reduction of labor pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare different interventions for the reduction of labor pain.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting prespecified inclusion criteria up to January, 2023. Interventions including electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), epidural analgesia (EA) and control treatments. The primary outcomes included pain scores, failure rate of natural delivery, adverse events and Apgar scores. The methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed by R software with gemtc package. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank the intervention.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the network meta-analysis. TEAS (WMD -3.1, 95% CrI -3.8, -2.5) and EA (WMD -2.1, 95% CrI -2.8, -1.3) was more effective than the control in decreasing VAS. TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 90.9%), EA ranked second (SUCRA, 74.0%) and control ranked last (SUCRA, 35.0%) for reducing VAS. For patients with labor pain, with respect to the most effective treatment for reducing failure rate of natural delivery, TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 96.6%), EA ranked second (SUCRA, 50.4%) and control ranked last (SUCRA, 3.0%). With regard to the Apgar scores, there was high probability that TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 80.7%), compared to control (SUCRA, 41.4%) and EA (SUCRA 27.9%). With regard to the adverse events, there was high probability that TEAS ranked first (SUCRA, 99.9%), compared to control (SUCRA, 33.2%) and EA (SUCRA 17.6%).

CONCLUSION

TEAS has the potential to serve as a viable alternative for women in labor, offering a simple, noninvasive, and non-pharmacological intervention that surpasses EA in terms of both analgesic effectiveness and safety for both mothers and neonates.

Artificial intelligent patient-controlled intravenous analgesia improves the outcomes of older patients with laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer from July 2019 to May 2021 were selected. The patients were assigned to Ai-PCIA group and control group. Ai-PCIA group received postoperative analgesia management and effect evaluation through intelligent wireless analgesia system + postoperative follow-up twice a day, while control group received analgesia management and effect evaluation through ward physician feedback + postoperative follow-up twice a day. The pain numerical score (NRS), Richards-Campbell Sleep Scale (RCSQ), and adverse outcomes were collected and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (20 females and 40 males with average (78.26 ± 6.42) years old) were included. The NRS scores at rest and during activity of the Ai-PCA group at 8, 12, and 24 h after the operation were significantly lower than that of the control group (all P < 0.05). The RCSQ score of Ai-PCA group was significantly higher than that of control group on the 1st and 2nd days after operation (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness and nausea, vomiting, and myocardial ischemia (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ai-PCIA can improve the analgesic effect and sleep quality of older patients after laparoscopic radical resection, which may be promoted in clinical analgesia practice.

Paravertebral vs Epidural Anesthesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The choice of postoperative pain management for patients who experience moderate to severe acute pain after thoracoscopic surgery is debatable. This study aimed to determine whether paravertebral block (PVB) provides more benefits than thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

From February 2020 to April 2022, patients without chronic pain who were scheduled to undergo thoracoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to the PVB group or the TEA group. The visual analogue scale score was used to measure the degree of pain when the patients were at rest or coughing.

RESULTS

In total, 176 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. No significant difference in the visual analogue scale score was found between the 2 groups at rest (P = .395) or with coughing (P = .157). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the average pain score between these 2 states (P = .221). The median time for catheter placement in the PVB group was 5 minutes, which was shorter than that (14 minutes) in the TEA group (P < .001). Moreover, the catheter placement failure rate in the PVB group was lower than that in the TEA group (P = .038). The incidence of hypotension (P = .016) and urinary retention (P = .006) in the PVB group was lower than that in the TEA group.

CONCLUSIONS

PVB can provide pain relief that is similar to that of TEA but with no additional puncture pain, a shorter catheter placement time, and fewer side effects in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Comparative analysis of lumbar quadratus lumborum block and epidural block for analgesia in uterine surgery at Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya

Over 80% of surgical patients experience postoperative pain, which, if inadequately managed, can lead to complications, prolonged rehabilitation, chronic pain, and decreased quality of life. Epidural block and quadratus lumborum block are techniques commonly used for postoperative pain management. This comparative analytic study aimed to analyze the differences in the analgesic effects of quadratus lumborum block and epidural block in uterine surgery at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital. The outcomes assessed were the numerical rating score (NRS) as a pain score and the administration of opioids as an adjuvant analgesic. Statistical analysis employed the Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test. The study included 32 patients who underwent uterine surgery at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the patients, 90.6% experienced mild pain, and 9.4% experienced moderate pain. Epidural blocks were performed in 50% of the patients, while quadratus lumborum blocks were performed in the other 50%. Additionally, 9.4% of the patients received opioids as adjuvant analgesics. The Mann-Whitney test revealed no significant difference in NRS between the epidural block and quadratus lumborum block groups (p-value>0.05). However, the Chi-square test indicated a significant difference in NRS between patients who received additional opioids as adjuvant analgesics and those who did not (p-value<0.00). There was no significant difference in NRS between patients who underwent epidural block and quadratus lumborum block as analgesic techniques.

Awareness and Attitude Toward Epidural Analgesia During Labor Among Pregnant Women in Taif City: A Hospital-Based Study

Objectives This study aimed to investigate the awareness and attitudes towards epidural analgesia (EA) among pregnant women in Taif City, Saudi Arabia. The rationale was to identify potential barriers to the acceptance and use of EA, which is an effective pain management option during labor. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey at a single healthcare center in Taif City. The participants, pregnant women visiting the center, were recruited using a convenience sampling method. Data collection was facilitated by a questionnaire distributed through a quick response (QR) code. The questionnaire assessed demographic information, awareness levels, previous exposure to EA, and personal attitudes toward its use during labor. Data analysis focused on quantifying the levels of awareness and identifying patterns in attitudes. Results The results revealed a low level of awareness about EA among the participants, with a significant proportion having never been exposed to it before the survey. Attitudes towards EA were varied, with some expressing openness to its use and others displaying apprehension or resistance, which appeared to be influenced by cultural perceptions and a lack of information. Conclusions The study highlighted a substantial lack of awareness and varied attitudes towards EA among pregnant women in Taif City. Educational interventions are necessary to increase awareness and address cultural misconceptions. The study's limited scope and potential sample bias suggest the need for broader culturally tailored research to inform strategies for improving the acceptance and utilization of labor analgesia.

Comparison of two doses of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection is an effective postoperative analgesic strategy in open or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy; however, the optimal dose has not been determined. In this trial, we compared the post-operative analgesic effects of two doses (300 vs. 400 μg) of ITM injections.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial, 56 donors were divided into either the 300 μg or 400 μg ITM group (n = 28, each). The primary outcome was the resting pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, and side effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were compared up to 48 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-five donors participated in the entire study. The mean resting pain scores at 24 h after surgery were 1.7 ± 1.6 and 1.7 ± 1.1 in the ITM 300 and ITM 400 groups, respectively (mean difference, 0 [95% CI, -.8 to .7], p = .978). The upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified non-inferiority margin (δ = 1), indicating that non-inferiority had been established. The incidence of PONV was lower in the ITM 300 group than in the ITM 400 group at 18 (p = .035) and 24 h postoperatively (p = .015). There were no significant differences in the resting and coughing pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at any time point.

CONCLUSION

For laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, preoperative ITM 300 μg exhibited non-inferior postoperative analgesic effects compared to ITM 400 μg, with a lower incidence of PONV.

A pregnant lady with compound bowel obstruction managed with thoracic epidural as sole anesthesia in a resource-restricted setting: a case report

BACKGROUND

Preserving the mother's safety, sustaining the pregnancy state, and achieving the optimal fetal outcome are the major priorities when managing obstetric patients for non-obstetric surgery. Only necessary and urgent surgeries are carried out during pregnancy due to the effects of anesthesia and surgery on the fetus. Compound bowel obstruction (small and large bowel obstruction) is rare, especially during the third trimester of pregnancy. Besides this, the procedure (laparotomy) was done with awake opioid-based thoracic epidural anesthesia as the sole anesthesia. This case report of awake laparotomy for major abdominal surgery is the first of its kind with an excellent feto-maternal outcome.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old African pregnant lady presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of abdominal pain and vomiting for an 8-hour duration; associated with this, she had a history of blurred vision, lightheadedness, loss of appetite, low-grade fever, and constipation. Later, she was diagnosed with large bowel obstruction and underwent an emergency laparotomy, managed with a thoracic epidural sole anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team approach is greatly recommended to safeguard a sufficient standard of care for both the mother and fetus. The provision of regional anesthesia for patients with high risks in perioperative periods is crucial for a better postoperative outcome. We have confidence that thoracic epidural anesthesia can be used as another anesthetic option for major abdominal surgery in a resource-restricted setting for patients who are expected to have a significant risk of perioperative adverse events under general anesthesia.

Peripheral Regional Anesthesia Using Local Anesthetics: Old Wine in New Bottles?

During the past decade, numerous efforts were undertaken aiming at prolonging the analgesic effect of regional anesthesia. With the development of extended-release formulations and enhanced selectivity for nociceptive sensory neurons, a very promising contribution to the development of pain medications has been achieved. At present, liposomal bupivacaine is the most popular, non-opioid, controlled drug delivery system, but its duration of action, which is still controversially discussed, and its expensiveness have decreased initial enthusiasm. Continuous techniques can be seen as an elegant alternative for providing a prolonged duration of analgesia, but for logistic or anatomical reasons, they are not always the best choice. Therefore, focus has been directed towards the perineural and/or intravenous addition of old and established substances. As for perineural application, most of these so-called 'adjuvants' are used outside their indication, and their pharmacological efficacy is often not or only poorly understood. This review aims to summarize the recent developments for prolonging the duration of regional anesthesia. It will also discuss the potential harmful interactions and side effects of frequently used analgesic mixtures.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia: The Pros and Cons

Appropriate perioperative pain control is essential to aid in patients' recovery after surgery; however, acute postsurgical pain remains poorly treated and there continues to be an overreliance on opiates. Perioperative pain control starts in the operating room, and opiate-free anesthesia (OFA), where no opiates are used intraoperatively, has been proposed as a feasible strategy to further minimize opiates in the perioperative period. In this article, we address the potential benefits and shortcomings of OFA, while exploring tools available to accomplish multimodal anesthesia and ideally OFA, and the evidence behind the techniques proposed.

[Epidural anesthesia : Clinical application and current developments]

Epidural anesthesia has been an established procedure in anesthesia for many years. Possibly due to its invasiveness, the associated fear of serious complications and the proliferation of alternative methods, an overall decline in its use can be observed. Several alternative procedures have been developed, especially the introduction of ultrasound into anesthesia, which are increasingly being used in clinical practice. The aim of this continuing medical education (CME) article is to shed light on the remaining range of indications for epidural anesthesia, to present the approaches and possible clinical benefits as well as to evaluate the effects that go beyond pure analgesia, according to the current evidence. In addition, potential complications and preventive approaches are discussed. This article is based on a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar.

Caudal epidural catheterization for pain management in 48 hospitalized horses: A descriptive study of demographics, complications, and outcomes

The placement of caudal epidural catheters in horses has become more frequent as a multi-modal analgesic strategy. Despite its integration into clinical practice, there are limited reports describing the use of caudal epidural catheterization for prolonged use in horses. The purpose of this study was to characterize the hospitalized caseload undergoing epidural catheterization for long-term epidural analgesic administration, to report the response to epidural therapy and observed complications, and to describe patient outcomes. Medical records of hospitalized equine patients that underwent placement of a caudal epidural catheter for analgesic management between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. For the 62 catheters placed in the 48 cases, the most frequent diagnosis category prompting epidural analgesia was orthopedic (43/48, 89.6%). Synovial sepsis was the most frequent specific diagnosis prompting epidural catheter placement (11/48, 22.9%). The initial response to epidural therapy was characterized as positive for 37/62 (59.7%) catheters. Complications were documented for 46/62 (74.2%) catheters. However, most of these complications were classified as mild (51.6%) or moderate (14.5%), and exaggerated physiologic responses were observed most frequently. Of the horses studied, 52.1% survived to be discharged from the hospital. With awareness of potential complications and vigilant monitoring, caudal epidural catheters should be considered for equine patients as an analgesic strategy.

Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Second-trimester induced labor in pregnant women was often more likely to suffer from psychological and physiological double pain. However, the analgesic management received less attention, and the optimal analgesic mode for second-trimester induced labor had not been determined. Our objective was to evaluate the feasible of epidural analgesia (EA) in second-trimester induced labor.

METHODS

From January 2020 to December 2021, Primipara who planned to undergo second-trimester induced labor in the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University were collected. The method of labor induction was oral mifepristone + amniotic cavity injection of Ethacridine Lactate. Based on whether or not patients received epidural analgesia, which were divided into EA group (30 cases) and non-EA (NEA) group (30 cases). The primary outcome were visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain and result of follow-up, the secondary outcomes included relative clinical parameter and labor duration.

RESULTS

Vaginal induction of labor was successful in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS of pain between the two groups before analgesia (P > .05), but the VAS of pain in the EA group was significantly lower than the NEA group (P < .05) after analgesia or at delivery. The following outcomes showed no statistical difference between two groups: labor duration, postpartum hemorrhage, hemorrhage ≥ 500 mL, intrapartum injury, second days hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, antibiotic therapy days, hospitalizations days, and placenta residue (P > .05). The median hospitalization costs of EA group was 4697.5 yuan, and NEA group was 3673 yuan, the difference was statistically significant (P < .001). No adverse events related to EA occurred during hospitalization, only 3 patients showed mild lumbago and back pain after follow-up to three months postpartum, which was significantly relieved after proper rest.

CONCLUSION

EA can significantly reduce the pain of parturients, which may be effective and safe in the second-trimester induced labor.

Impact of combined epidural anaesthesia/analgesia on postoperative cognitive impairment in patients receiving general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of combined epidural anaesthesia/analgesia (EAA) against postoperative delirium/cognitive dysfunction (POD/POCD) in adults after major non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia (GA).

METHODS

The databases of PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to November 2021 for available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of EAA on risk of POD/POCD. The primary outcome was risk of POD/POCD, while the secondary outcomes comprised postoperative pain score, length of hospital stay (LOS), risk of complications, and postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV).

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of eight studies with a total of 2376 patients (EAA group: 1189 patients; non-EAA group: 1187 patients) revealed no difference in risk of POD/POCD between the EAA and the non-EAA groups [Risk ratio (RR): 0.68; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.13, p = 0.14, I² = 73%], but the certainty of evidence was very low. Nevertheless, the EAA group had lower pain score at postoperative 24 h [mean difference (MD): -1.49, 95% CI: -2.38 to -0.61; I² = 98%; five RCTs; n = 476] and risk of PONV (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.93, p = 0.01, I² = 0%; three RCTs, 1876 patients) than those in the non-EAA group. Our results showed no significant impact of EAA on the pain score at postoperative 36-72 h, LOS, and risk of complications.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that EAA had no significant impact on the incidence of POD/POCD in patients following non-cardiac surgery.

Busy day effect on the use of obstetrical interventions and epidural analgesia during labour: a cross-sectional register study of 601 247 deliveries

Background

Daily delivery volume might affect the quality of obstetric care. We explored the busy day effect on selected obstetrical interventions and epidural analgesia performed during labour in different sized delivery hospitals and on the Finnish obstetric ecosystem.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study on Finnish Medical Birth Register data of singleton pregnancies (N = 601,247) from 26 delivery hospitals from 2006 to 2016. Delivery hospitals were stratified by annual delivery volume: C (category) 1: < 1000, C2: 1000–1999, C3: 2000–2999, C4: ≥3000, and C5: university hospitals. The exposure variables were defined as quiet, optimal, and busy days determined based on daily delivery volume distribution in each hospital category. Quiet and busy days included approximately 10% of the lowest and highest delivery volume days, while the rest were defined as optimal. Outcome measures were unplanned caesarean section (CS), instrumental delivery, induction of labour, and epidural analgesia. We compared the incidence of outcomes in quiet vs. optimal, busy vs. optimal, and busy vs. quiet days using logistic regression. The statistical significance level was set at 99% to reduce the likelihood of significant spurious findings.

Results

In the total population, the incidence of instrumental delivery was 8% (99% CI 2–15%) lower on quiet than on optimal days. In smaller hospitals (C1 and C2), unplanned caesarean sections were performed up to one-third less frequently on busy than optimal and quiet days. More (27%, 99% CI 12–44%) instrumental deliveries were performed in higher delivery volume hospitals (C4) on busy than quiet days. In C1-C3, deliveries were induced (12–35%) less often and in C5 (37%, 99% CI 28–45%) more often on busy than optimal delivery days. More (59–61%) epidural analgesia was performed on busy than optimal and quiet days in C4 and 8% less in C2 hospitals.

Conclusions

Pooled analysis showed that busyness had no effect on outcomes at the obstetric ecosystem level, but 10% fewer instrumental deliveries were performed in quiet than on busy days overall. Furthermore, dissecting the data shows that small hospitals perform less, and large non-tertiary hospitals perform more interventions during busy days.

Effect of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Based on ERAS on Postoperative Recovery of Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Objective

To explore the effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

Between January 2019 and December 2020, 90 patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery and assessed for eligibility were recruited and randomly assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to receive either conventional analgesic management (regular group) or PCEA based on ERAS (ERAS group). Comparisons of postoperative rehabilitation indicators, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, self-care ability, complications, and nursing satisfaction were conducted between the two groups.

Results

The ERAS group had significantly shorter first exhaust time (FET), first defecation time (FDT), out-of-bed activity time (OAT), and length of stay (LOS) versus the regular group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were significantly decreased after treatment, with lower results observed in the ERAS group (P < 0.05). The level of self-responsibility, self-concept, self-care skills, and health knowledge increased significantly in both groups after the intervention, and the ERAS group showed significantly higher results than the regular group (P < 0.05). The total incidence of complications in the ERAS group was significantly lower than that in the regular group (P < 0.05). Eligible patients given PCEA based on ERAS were associated with a higher nursing satisfaction (97.78%) versus conventional analgesic management (82.22%) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The application of ERAS for postoperative PCEA management in gynecological laparoscopy provides promising results by effectively enhancing the quality of surgery and promoting rapid postoperative recovery, with a good safety profile.

The Options for Neuraxial Drug Administration

Neuraxial drug administration, i.e., the injection of drugs into the epidural or intrathecal space to produce anesthesia or analgesia, is a technique developed more than 120 years ago. Today, it still is widely used in daily practice in anesthesiology and in acute and chronic pain therapy. A multitude of different drugs have been introduced for neuraxial injection, only a part of which have obtained official approval for that indication. A broad understanding of the pharmacology of those agents is essential to the clinician to utilize them in a safe and efficient manner. In the present narrative review, we summarize current knowledge on neuraxial anatomy relevant to clinical practice, including pediatric anatomy. Then, we delineate the general pharmacology of neuraxial drug administration, with particular attention to specific aspects of epidural and intrathecal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Furthermore, we describe the most common clinical indications for neuraxial drug administration, including the perioperative setting, obstetrics, and chronic pain. Then, we discuss possible neurotoxic effects of neuraxial drugs, and moreover, we detail the specific properties of the most commonly used neuraxial drugs that are relevant to clinicians who employ epidural or intrathecal drug administration, in order to ensure adequate treatment and patient safety in these techniques. Finally, we give a brief overview on new developments in neuraxial drug therapy.

Transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery: The EXPLANE randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Compare transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks with liposomal bupivacaine were to epidural analgesia for pain at rest and opioid consumption in patients recovering from abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND

ERAS pathways suggest TAP blocks in preference to epidural analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, the relative efficacies of TAP blocks and epidural analgesia remains unknown.

METHODS

Patients having major abdominal surgery were enrolled at six sites and randomly assigned 1:1 to thoracic epidural analgesia or bilateral/4-quadrant TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. Intravenous opioids were used as needed. Non-inferiority margins were a priori set at 1 point on an 11-point pain numeric rating scale for pain at rest and at a 25% increase in postoperative opioid consumption.

RESULTS

Enrollment was stopped per protocol at 3rd interim analysis after crossing an a priori futility boundary. 498 patients were analyzed (255 had TAP blocks and 243 had epidurals). Pain scores at rest in patients assigned to TAP blocks were significantly non-inferior to those given epidurals, with an estimated difference of 0.09 points (CI: -0.12, 0.30; noninferiority P < 0.001). Opioid consumption during the initial 3 postoperative days in TAP patients was not non-inferior to epidurals, with an estimated ratio of geometric means of 1.37 (CI: 1.05, 1.79; non-inferiority P = 0.754). However, the absolute difference was only 21 mg morphine equivalents over the 3 days. Patients with epidurals were more likely to experience mean arterial pressures <65 mmHg than those given TAP blocks: 48% versus 31%, P = 0.006.

CONCLUSION

Pain scores at rest during the initial three days after major abdominal surgery were similar. Patients assigned to TAP blocks required more opioid then epidural patients but had less hypotension. Clinicians should reconsider epidural analgesia in patients at risk from hypotension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02996227.

Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia is Associated with Better Survival than Desflurane Anesthesia in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Previous studies have shown that anesthetic techniques can affect outcomes of cancer surgery. We investigated the association between anesthetic techniques and patient outcomes after elective epithelial ovarian cancer surgery.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective open surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer between January 2009 and December 2014. Patients were grouped according to the administration of propofol or desflurane anesthesia. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed, and survival curves were constructed from the date of surgery to death. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for age, body mass index, preoperative carbohydrate antigen-125 level, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging, and operation and anesthesia time.

Results: In total, 165 patients (76 deaths, 46.1%) who received desflurane anesthesia and 119 (30 deaths, 25.2%) who received propofol anesthesia were eligible for analysis. After propensity matching, 104 patients were included in each group. In the matched analysis, patients who received propofol anesthesia had better survival with a hazard ratio of 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.81; p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses also showed significantly better survival with old age, high body mass index, elevated carbohydrate antigen-125 level, advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, and prolonged operation and anesthesia time in the matched propofol group. In addition, patients administered with propofol anesthesia had less postoperative recurrence and metastasis than those administered with desflurane anesthesia in the matched analysis.

Conclusion: Propofol anesthesia was associated with better survival in patients who underwent elective epithelial ovarian cancer open surgery. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of propofol anesthesia on oncological outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Association of Labor Epidural Analgesia With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children

IMPORTANCE

A recent cohort study found that epidural analgesia during labor was associated with an increased risk of autism in offspring.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if labor epidural increases the risk of autism in offspring.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This nationwide retrospective cohort study identified all live-born children in Denmark between January 2006 and December 2013. Follow-up commenced at children's first birthday and ended in December 2017. Among 485 093 live-born children, 5915 were excluded because of occurrences during the first year of life including death, emigration, misregistration of birth, diagnosis of disease inherently linked to autism, or diagnosis of autism.

EXPOSURES

Administration of epidural analgesia during labor, as identified by procedure code.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome of interest was incident diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision codes in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register or National Patient Register. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression, adjusted for covariates describing maternal comorbidity, sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, pregnancy, psychiatric illness, psychotropic medication, medical-seeking behavior, and family history of autism. A secondary analysis used a within-mother design including only children of mothers with both exposure and nonexposure to labor epidural analgesia in different deliveries.

RESULTS

The cohort included 479 178 children (233 405 girls [48.7%]; median maternal age at delivery, 30.9 [IQR, 27.6-34.2] years); of these, 92 900 (19.4%) were exposed to epidural analgesia during labor. Median follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR, 4.9-9.0 years), and by the end of follow-up, 6428 children (1.3%) had been diagnosed with autism. Exposed children had an autism diagnosis incidence rate of 23.1 per 10 000 person-years compared with 18.5 per 10 000 person-years in the unexposed group (crude hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.21-1.37]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.98-1.11]). A secondary within-mother analysis including 59 154 children (12.3%) estimated an autism diagnosis incidence rate of 20.8 per 10 000 person-years in the exposed group and 17.1 per 10 000 person-years in the unexposed group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.90-1.21]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this nationwide cohort study of Danish children, maternal exposure to epidural analgesia during labor was not significantly associated with autism spectrum disorder in offspring.

Ultrasound-guided single popliteal sciatic nerve block is an effective postoperative analgesia strategy for calcaneal fracture: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesia effect of ultrasound-guided single popliteal sciatic nerve block for calcaneal fracture.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients scheduled for unilateral open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fracture were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Patients in group B received ultrasound-guided single popliteal sciatic nerve block after operation, but Patients in group A did not. All patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after operation. The time to initiation of PCIA, the time of first pressing the analgesia pump, duration of analgesia pump use and the total number of times the patient pressed the analgesia pump were recorded. The time of rescue analgesia and the adverse reactions were recorded. Pain magnitude of the patients immediately after discharge from operating room (T1), and at 4th (T2), 8th (T3), 12th (T4), 16th (T5), 24th (T6) and 48th (T7) h after the operation were assessed with visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, patient, surgeon and nurse satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

The VAS scores at T2 ~ T5, the time of rescue analgesia and the adverse reactions, the total number of times the patient pressed the analgesia pump were significantly declined in group B (p < 0.001). The time to initiation of PCIA, the time of first pressing the analgesia pump, duration of analgesia pump use were prolonged and patient surgeon and nurse satisfaction were improved in group B (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided single popliteal sciatic nerve block is an effective postoperative analgesia strategy for calcaneal fracture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100042340. Registered 19 January 2021, URL of trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=66526 .

Gabapentin reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management solely with opioids elevates the risk of opioid-related adverse events during hospitalization and after discharge from the hospital. Clinical trials have demonstrated gabapentinoids as viable adjunctive treatments for spinal surgeries. However, only a few practice-based studies have examined the efficacy of gabapentin as an opioid-sparing agent for patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy in rural hospital settings.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of gabapentin on opioid consumption and pain perception in patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy at a rural community hospital.

METHODS

Data were collected by retrospective chart reviews of 99 patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy at Yavapai Regional Medical Center from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. The patients were stratified into 2 groups: those who were taking gabapentin as outpatients before surgery and were continued on the same dose postoperatively (n = 50, gabapentin group) and those who were not taking gabapentin preoperatively or postoperatively (n = 49, usual-treatment group). The primary end points were opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and pain for 24 hours postsurgery.

RESULTS

Outcomes from the mixed-model analysis of variance showed significant main effects of group and time for opioid consumption in MME (F_1,97 = 4.3, P < 0.05 and F_3,291 = 133.9, P < 0.001, respectively) and numerical pain scale scores (F_1,99 = 4.0, P < 0.05 and F_3,241 = 21.4, P < 0.001, respectively) and group-time interaction for opioid consumption in MME (F_3,291 = 2.6, P = 0.05). Post hoc analyses showed that opioid consumption in MME was significantly lower in the gabapentin group than in the usual-treatment group for the first 6 hours postoperatively. The pain scores were significantly lower in the gabapentin group than in the usual-treatment group across all time periods.

CONCLUSION

Patients on gabapentin showed reductions in pain perception and postoperative opioid consumption. The results extend the findings from randomized trials to a real-world clinical setting. These data support using gabapentin in conjunction with opioids for pain management of patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy.

Comparison of the analgesic effect of quadratus lumborum block and epidural block in open uterine surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Effective regional analgesia during open surgery could reduce opioid consumption and enhance early recovery. We compared the effects of the newly developed quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and the traditional epidural block (EB) in open uterine surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, we included patients scheduled for elective open uterine surgery during May - September 30, 2019. Patients received QLB or EB for perioperative pain relief before general anesthesia. Perioperative opioid consumption, and numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10) pain scores after surgery, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), ephedrine and urapidil use during surgery, lower limb muscle strength, timing of first flatus and defecation, nausea, vomiting, and other complications within 24 h post-surgery, were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Data of 72 (86%; 36/group) of 83 eligible patients were analyzed. Remifentanil consumption during surgery was higher in the QLB than in the EB group, while cumulative sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery was similar between both groups. NRS pain scores at rest and during activity were higher at 1 h post-surgery, and MAP was higher at 5-, 15-, and 30-min postincision in the QLB than in the EB group; HR was similar between groups. Lower ephedrine requirements, higher lower limb muscle strength at 1 h post-surgery, and lower nausea incidence were observed in the QLB group.

CONCLUSIONS

QLB produces a less intense but longer block and fewer side effects in the first 24 h after open uterine surgery than those produced by EB.

To evaluate the effect of quadratus lumborum block on the tramadol sparing effect in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia surgery: A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims

An ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum (QL) block provides both somatic and visceral analgesia in abdominal surgeries. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative tramadol sparing effect of single-shot anterior QL block in inguinal hernia surgery patients.

Methods

This prospective, randomised controlled trial was conducted in a single tertiary care centre over a period of 1 year. A total of 50 patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II of both sexes aged 18-80 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥20 to ≤35 kg/m² undergoing uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernia surgery under spinal anaesthesia (SA) were randomly allocated to either of the two groups. The block group (n = 25) received single-shot anterior QL block with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and the control group (n = 25) received no block. Postoperatively, patients received intravenous (IV) paracetamol 1g every 6 h and tramadol patient-controlled analgesia up to 24 h. Primary outcome was total tramadol consumption at 24 h postoperatively.

Results

The total tramadol consumption mean ± SD [95% CI (range)] at 24 h in the block group was 84.00 ± 37.86 [68.37-99.63 (20-160)] mg versus 93.60 ± 34.99 [79.16-108.04 (20-160)] mg in control group, (p value = 0.36). Postoperative VAS score, haemodynamics, and patient satisfaction score were similar in both the groups. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

A single-shot anterior QL block did not establish a postoperative tramadol-sparing effect at 24 h as compared to no block in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery under SA.

Postoperative pain management in obstetrics and gynecology

The efficiency and quality of postoperative pain management may be considered unsatisfactory in Europe, as well as in the United States. Notwithstanding our better understanding of the physiology of pain and the development of new analgesia procedures, the improvement in satisfaction of patients has not be enhanced to the same degree. Obstetrics and gynecology are no exception to this statement. In fact, obstetrics and gynecology are surgical departments in which patients experience the greatest severity of postoperative pain. Current concepts of postoperative pain management are largely based on the administration of systemic non-opioid and opioid analgesics, supplemented with regional analgesia procedures and/or peripheral nerve blockades and, in some cases, the administration of other pain-relieving pharmaceutical agents. Based on the existing body of evidence, it would be appropriate to develop procedure-related concepts of analgesia. The concepts are based on the special circumstances of the respective department, and the scheme of analgesia is aligned to the respective interventions. Generally, however, a surgeon’s individual experience in dealing with the procedures and substances could be more significant than the theoretical advantages demonstrated in preceding investigations.

Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Paravertebral Block after Minimally Invasive Radical Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Objective

To compare the effects of continuous paravertebral block analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after minimally invasive radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and their effects on postoperative recovery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed among 233 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical operation and met the requirements, including 87 patients (group C) who were successfully placed with a continuous paravertebral block device under direct vision and 146 patients (group P) who used a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia device. Visual analogue pain score (VAS) at rest and in motion for 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after awakening, incidence of adverse reactions of the two analgesic methods, occurrence of pulmonary complications after operation, use of emergency analgesics, and hospital stay after operation was recorded.

Results

The VAS scores of group C in resting and active state at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after operation were significantly lower than those of group P (P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse reactions, pulmonary complications, and the use of emergency analgesics in group C were lower than those in group P (P < 0.05). The hospitalization time of group C was significantly shortened, and the satisfaction degree of group C was significantly higher than that of group P (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Paravertebral block is safe and effective for patients undergoing minimally invasive radical esophagectomy. The incidence of adverse reactions and complications is lower, and the satisfaction of postoperative analgesia is higher, which is beneficial to the rapid recovery of patients after operation.

Safe and Effective Use of Bilateral Erector Spinae Block in Patient Suffering from Post-Operative Coagulopathy Following Hepatectomy

Patient: Male, 75-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Cholangiocarcinoma

Symptoms: Postoperative pain

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: Continuous erector spinae nerve block

Specialty: Oncology

The analgesic efficacy compared ultrasound-guided continuous transverse abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

This review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of continuous transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with epidural analgesia (EA) in adults after abdominal surgery.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to June 2019 for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the analgesic efficacy of continuous TAP block compared with EA after abdominal surgery. The weighted mean differences (WMDs) were estimates for continuous variables with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data. The pre-specified primary outcome was the dynamic pain scores 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Eight trials including 453 patients (TAP block:224 patients; EA: 229 patients) ultimately met the inclusion criteria and seven trials were included in the meta-analysis. Dynamic pain scores after 24 h were equivalent between TAP block and EA groups (WMD:0.44; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.99; I² = 91%; p = 0.11). The analysis showed a significant difference between the subgroups according to regularly administering (4 trials; WMD:-0.11; 95% CI: - 0.32 to 0.09; I² = 0%; p = 0.28) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or not (3 trials; WMD:1.02; 95% CI: 0.09 to 1.96; I² = 94%; p = 0.03) for adjuvant analgesics postoperatively. The measured time of the urinary catheter removal in the TAP group was significantly shorter (3 trials, WMD:-18.95, 95% CI:-25.22 to - 12.71; I² = 0%; p < 0.01), as was time to first ambulation postoperatively (4 trials, WMD:-6.61, 95% CI: - 13.03 to - 0.19; I² = 67%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous TAP block, combined with NSAIDs, can provide non-inferior dynamic analgesia efficacy compared with EA in postoperative pain management after abdominal surgery. In addition, continuous TAP block is associated with fewer postoperative side effects.

Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care

There has been a small, but significant, increase in community births (home and birth-center births) in the United States in recent years. The rate increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008, and another 59% from 2008 to 2012, though the overall rate is still low at less than 2%. Although the United States is not the only country with a large majority of births occurring in the hospital, there are other high-resource countries where home and birth-center birth are far more common and where community midwives (those attending births at home and in birth centers) are far more central to the provision of care. In many such countries, the differences in perinatal outcomes between hospital and community births are small, and there are lower rates of maternal morbidity in the community setting. In the United States, perinatal mortality appears to be higher for community births, though there has yet to be a national study comparing outcomes across settings that controls for planned place of birth. Rates of intervention, including cesarean delivery, are significantly higher in hospital births in the United States. Compared with the United States, countries that have higher rates of community births have better integrated systems with clearer national guidelines governing risk criteria and planned birth location, as well as transfer to higher levels of care. Differences in outcomes, systems, approaches, and client motivations are important to understand, because they are critical to the processes of person-centered care and to risk reduction across all birth settings.

Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia

BACKGROUND

To compare the application and efficacy of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for continuous epidural anesthesia (CEA) and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in labor analgesia.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty pregnant women requesting labor analgesia from October 2017 to August 2018 were selected retrospectively. According to the anesthetic method, subjects were divided into CSEA group and CEA group. Ropivacaine combined with sufentanil were used in all subjects. The labor time, visual analogue scale (VAS), Apgar score of newborn, adverse pregnancy outcomes and adverse drug reactions were observed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in pre-analgesia (T₀) VAS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS scores of first stage of labor (T₁), second stage of labor (T₂) and third stage of labor (T₃) in CSEA group were significantly lower than CEA group (P < 0.01). The onset time, T₁ and total labor time in CSEA group were significantly shorter than CEA group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between T2 and T3 (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and Apgar scores at 1, 5 and 10 min after birth between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse drug outcomes in CSEA group was significantly lower than CEA group (P < 0.01). Maternal satisfaction in CSEA group was significantly higher than CEA group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Considering ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for CSEA achieved a shorter onset time and labor period, significant analgesic effect, lower adverse drug reactions rates and higher subject satisfaction than CEA, it may be worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Dynamic analysis of variations in postoperative pain trajectories over time in patients receiving epidural analgesia using latent curve models

BACKGROUND

Although epidural analgesia (EA) provides reliable pain relief after major operations, few studies have explored how postoperative pain trajectories change over time in patients receiving EA and the associated factors. This study aimed to model the dynamic features of pain trajectories after surgery and investigate factors associated with their variations using latent curve analysis.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a single medical center in Taiwan, and data were obtained from patients receiving perioperative EA by electronic chart review. Mean numeric rating pain scores were recorded daily in the first five postoperative days. Patient demographics, surgical sites, and infusion pump settings were also collected. Latent curve models using two latent variables, intercept and slope, were developed to explain the variations in postoperative pain scores over time. The influences of potential predictors of postoperative pain trajectories were further evaluated for the final model determination.

RESULTS

Of the 1294 collected patients, the daily pain scores averaged 2.0 to 2.9 for different surgical sites. Among the nine significant factors influencing pain trajectories, chest and lower extremity surgery tended to induce less and more baseline pain, respectively, than those with abdomen surgery (both p < 0.001). In addition, male patients and those with a shorter anesthesia time had less baseline pain (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). The older and lighter patients and those with chest surgery or American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 tended to have milder decreasing trends in pain trajectories. A higher infusion rate was associated with an elevated baseline level and smoother decreasing trend in pain trajectory. The final model fit our data acceptably (root mean square error of approximation = 0.05, comparative fit index = 0.97).

CONCLUSION

Latent curve analysis provided insights into the dynamic nature of variations in postoperative pain trajectories. Further studies investigating more factors associated with pain trajectories are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms behind the transitions of pain scores over time after surgery.

Opiate Intoxication Caused by Epidural Infusion of Morphine: A Case Report of a Near Fatal Medication Error

INTRODUCTION

Epidural infusion of local anesthetics with opioids is widely used for pain control during the perioperative-and peripartum-periods. Selection of the opioid, appropriate dosing, and follow-up by the acute pain service are critical in providing safe postoperative epidural analgesia.

CASE REPORT SUMMARY

A 71-year-old man was scheduled for a parastomal hernia repair with midline laparotomy. The parastomal hernia was a complication from a previously performed colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Preoperatively, the patient received a lower thoracic epidural catheter. The epidural infusate (0.2% ropivacaine with 0.5 µg/mL sufentanil) was prepared and double-checked by holding area nurses. The fact that the right prescription medication label partially covered a morphine label went unnoticed. The intraoperative phase was characterized by stable parameters. Postoperatively, it was not possible to demonstrate an epidural nerve block. No pain was reported, and the patient could be transferred to the ward. The patient developed coma and delayed respiratory depression after discharge to the surgical ward, requiring intensive care unit admission and naloxone administration. Analysis of the syringe content revealed the presence of morphine (1 mg/mL).

DISCUSSION

Color-coded prefilled syringes combined with the use of an epidural specific syringe connector to prevent cross-connections should become standard practice. In addition, delayed respiratory depression should be considered after epidural administration of morphine.

Analgesic effect of the ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an effective analgesia that lowers opioid consumption after lower abdominal and hip surgeries. The subcostal approach to transmuscular QLB is a novel technique that can provide postoperative analgesia by blocking more dermatomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and viability of subcostal approach to QLB after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Methods

Sixty patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy were randomly divided into the subcostal approach to QLB group (QLB group, n = 30) and the control group (C group, n = 30). All patients underwent ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to QLB in an ipsilateral parasagittal oblique plane at the L1–L2 level. The QLB group received 0.4 cc/kg of 0.3% ropivacaine, and the C group received 0.4 cc/kg of 0.9% saline. Postoperatively, a patient-controlled intravenous analgesic pump with sufentanil was attached to all the patients. The primary outcome was sufentanil consumption within the first 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the Ramsey sedation scale (RSS) scores and Bruggemann comfort scale (BCS) scores 6 h (T1), 12 h (T2), and 24 h (T3) after surgery, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, time to recovery of intestinal function, mobilization time after surgery, and presence of side effects.

Results

Sufentanil consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the QLB group than in the C group (mean [standard deviation]: 34.1 [9.9] μg vs 42.1 [11.6] μg, P = .006). The RSS scores did not differ between the two groups, and the BCS scores of the QLB group at T1 and T2 time points was significantly higher than those of the C group(P<0.05). The consumption of remifentanil intraoperatively and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were significantly lower in the QLB group (P<0.05). Time to recovery of intestinal function and mobilization time after surgery were significantly earlier in the QLB group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the QLB group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to QLB is an effective analgesic technique in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy as it reduces the consumption of sufentanil postoperatively.

Trial registration

ChiCTR1800020296 0 (Prospective registered). Initial registration date was 22/12/2018.

Curative effect of remifentanil on labor analgesia in newborns

Objective: To investigate the curative effect of remifentanil on analgesia in newborns.Patients and methods: One hundred and twenty full-term puerperae from January 2013 to December 2013 were selected and randomly divided into three groups: remifentanil patient-controlled intravenous labor analgesia group (Group A, n = 40), patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) group (Group B, n = 40), and spontaneous labor group (Group C, n = 40). General conditions, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, labor stage, bleeding, delivery mode, neonatal asphyxia rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation in puerpera, and umbilical arterial blood gas analysis indexes of the fetus were measured. In addition, complications and adverse reactions were recorded.Results: VAS scores in Group A and B were significantly lower than that in Group C at each time point after analgesic intervention (p < .05), without differences at 30 min and 1 h after analgesia between Group A and B (p > .05). However, VAS scores in Group A were significantly higher than those in Group B at the full opening of the uterine orifice and fetal delivery (p < .05). The active phases in the first stage of labor in Group A and B were significantly shorter than that in Group C (p <.05). There were no significant differences in general conditions, VAS score before analgesia, the second and third stages of labor, delivery mode, bleeding, neonatal asphyxia rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation, pH value, partial pressure of oxygen (PO₂), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO₂) among three groups (p > .05).Conclusions: Remifentanil intravenous labor analgesia is not superior to PCEA, but does not increase adverse effects, suggesting it might be a supplementary method of PCEA.