1
|
Ince HY, Phan H, Nasr SZ, Pierce JM, Malas N. Clearing up the smoke: Physical and mental health considerations regarding cannabis use in adolescents with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2023; 58:398-407. [PMID: 36349504 PMCID: PMC10098788 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The cannabis plant is the most used federally illegal drug in the United States and is widely used by adolescents. Cannabis has complex effects on the body and mind. All health professionals who take care of adolescents with cystic fibrosis (CF) should be aware of the factors impacting cannabis use in CF. Given limited evidence regarding the benefits of cannabis and the significant risks, clinicians have the responsibility to identify risk of cannabis use early, counsel patients about the risks, provide a safe space for ongoing conversations about cannabis use in the context of CF care, and deliver evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Yavuz Ince
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Hanna Phan
- College of PharmacyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Samya Z. Nasr
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric PulmonologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Jessica M. Pierce
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Nasuh Malas
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharma P, Holland A, Sheikh T, Novy B, Oesterle T, Platt R, Hammond CJ. Primary care provider attitudes, experiences and practices about cannabidiol (CBD) and barriers to patient-provider communication about CBD use: A qualitative study. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100044. [PMID: 37213726 PMCID: PMC10194378 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Federal hemp legalization and ongoing shifts in US marijuana laws have led to increased population-wide use of cannabidiol (CBD) supplements, often without the knowledge of primary healthcare providers (PCPs). Given the potential risks related to CBD use, especially in vulnerable subgroups, improved communication is warranted. This study aimed to examine PCP attitudes, experiences, and practice behaviors related to CBD and provider-reported barriers to communication with patients about CBD use. Methods Fourteen PCPs were recruited and participated in semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were digitally analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Analyses identified that most PCPs had neutral views about CBD use by their patients. The study found that discussions about CBD use were initiated by patients. Most PCPs cited lack of time, discomfort, low-quality evidence, and low prioritization as reasons for not discussing CBD with patients. Conclusion PCPs rarely screen for or discuss CBD use with their patients and most of them had neutral views about CBD use by their patients. A number of barriers exist to open dialogue about CBD. Innovation Our study is the first in-depth report on PCP attitudes, experiences, and practice behaviors related to CBD. The findings of our study have the potential to significantly impact future PCP practice behaviors. These results can inform healthcare system policies around screening for CBD use and PCP communication training. In doing so, these efforts may mitigate risk and optimize benefits related to the expanding CBD market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pravesh Sharma
- Mayo Clinic Health System, 1221 Whipple St., Eau Claire, WI 54703, USA
| | - Ashley Holland
- Mayo Clinic Health System, 1221 Whipple St., Eau Claire, WI 54703, USA
| | - Taharat Sheikh
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Blake Novy
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Rheanna Platt
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Effects of Cannabinoids: An Updated Review with Future Perspectives and Current Challenges. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15101228. [PMID: 36297340 PMCID: PMC9607911 DOI: 10.3390/ph15101228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of new antibiotics is urgently needed to combat the threat of bacterial resistance. New classes of compounds that have novel properties are urgently needed for the development of effective antimicrobial agents. The extract of Cannabis sativa L. has been used to treat multiple ailments since ancient times. Its bioactivity is largely attributed to the cannabinoids found in its plant. Researchers are currently searching for new anti-infective agents that can treat various infections. Although its phytocannabinoid ingredients have a wide range of medical benefits beyond the treatment of infections, they are primarily associated to psychotropic effects. Different cannabinoids have been demonstrated to be helpful against harmful bacteria, including Gram-positive bacteria. Moreover, combination therapy involving the use of different antibiotics has shown synergism and broad-spectrum activity. The purpose of this review is to gather current data on the actions of Cannabis sativa (C. sativa) extracts and its primary constituents such as terpenes and cannabinoids towards pathogens in order to determine their antimicrobial properties and cytotoxic effects together with current challenges and future perspectives in biomedical application.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill KP, Gold MS, Nemeroff CB, McDonald W, Grzenda A, Widge AS, Rodriguez C, Kraguljac NV, Krystal JH, Carpenter LL. Risks and Benefits of Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2022; 179:98-109. [PMID: 34875873 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21030320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The United States is in the midst of rapidly changing laws regarding cannabis. The increasing availability of cannabis for recreational and medical use requires that mental health clinicians be knowledgeable about evidence to be considered when counseling both patients and colleagues. In this review, the authors outline the evidence from randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials for therapeutic use of cannabinoids for specific medical conditions and the potential side effects associated with acute and chronic cannabis use. METHODS Searches of PubMed and PsycInfo were conducted for articles published through July 2021 reporting on "cannabis" or "cannabinoids" or "medicinal cannabis." Additional articles were identified from the reference lists of published reviews. Articles that did not contain the terms "clinical trial" or "therapy" in the title or abstract were not reviewed. A total of 4,431 articles were screened, and 841 articles that met criteria for inclusion were reviewed by two or more authors. RESULTS There are currently no psychiatric indications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cannabinoids, and there is limited evidence supporting the therapeutic use of cannabinoids for treatment of psychiatric disorders. To date, evidence supporting cannabinoid prescription beyond the FDA indications is strongest for the management of pain and spasticity. CONCLUSIONS As cannabinoids become more available, the need for an evidence base adequately evaluating their safety and efficacy is increasingly important. There is considerable evidence that cannabinoids have a potential for harm in vulnerable populations such as adolescents and those with psychotic disorders. The current evidence base is insufficient to support the prescription of cannabinoids for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Hill
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Mark S Gold
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Charles B Nemeroff
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - William McDonald
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Adrienne Grzenda
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Alik S Widge
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Carolyn Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Nina V Kraguljac
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - John H Krystal
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, andBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Hill);Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis (Gold);Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Nemeroff);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (McDonald);Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda);Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., andVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. (Rodriguez);Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Kraguljac);Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (Krystal);Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, andButler Hospital, Providence, R.I. (Carpenter)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shanahan L, Steinhoff A, Bechtiger L, Copeland WE, Ribeaud D, Eisner M, Quednow BB. Frequent teenage cannabis use: Prevalence across adolescence and associations with young adult psychopathology and functional well-being in an urban cohort. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 228:109063. [PMID: 34601277 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amidst cannabis legalization efforts and laws, we do not fully understand how the youngest frequent cannabis users fare during young adulthood. This study aims to 1) examine the prevalence of cannabis use during adolescence, and 2) investigate links of frequent (i.e., weekly or daily) teenage cannabis use with psychopathology and functional well-being at age 20-compared to no or occasional use. METHODS Data came from a prospective-longitudinal cohort study (assessments from 2004 to 2018, from ages 7-20) in an urban setting (N = 1482). Substance use was assessed with self-reports between ages 13 and 20. At age 20, participants reported on psychopathology (psychotic symptoms, problematic substance use, aggression, and internalizing symptoms) and functional well-being (delinquency, financial difficulties, social exclusion, general well-being, and not being in education, employment, or training). Covariates were based on self-, parent-, teacher-, and behavioral measures. FINDINGS Almost one in five adolescents had used cannabis frequently between ages 13 and 17 (26.6% of males, 9.8% of females). Adjusting nearly 20 potential confounders, frequent teenage cannabis use was associated with age 20 problematic substance use and poorer functional well-being compared to the no cannabis use and the occasional use groups. Frequent teenage cannabis use was more consistently associated with age 20 functional outcomes compared to frequent teenage nicotine or alcohol use. CONCLUSIONS Frequent teenage cannabis use was common and associated with problematic substance use, more delinquency, and poorer functional well-being at age 20. Accordingly, frequent teenage cannabis users could experience increased difficulties in mastering the transitions of young adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilly Shanahan
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14, Box 1, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Annekatrin Steinhoff
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laura Bechtiger
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - William E Copeland
- Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Box 3454, 1 South Prospect Street, MC 446AR6, Burlington VT 05401, USA
| | - Denis Ribeaud
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Eisner
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, UK
| | - Boris B Quednow
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacopsychology, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Zurich, PO Box 1931, Lenggstrasse 31, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Winterthurerstr. 190, Y55 J04, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee CA, Smith DC, Lanker A, Clary KL. Sensitivity and specificity of the CRAFFT to identify heavy cannabis use: Evidence from a large statewide adolescent sample. Addict Behav 2021; 122:107006. [PMID: 34174550 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Screening adolescents at risk for cannabis use disorders is critical. The CRAFFT is a screening tool designed to address both alcohol and drug use among youth. Current study tests the psychometric properties of the CRAFFT and attempts to modify one of the screening items to compare the efficiency. DESIGN We examined the ideal cut-off point of the CRAFFT for identifying persons with heavy cannabis use and compared the utility of the original and revised CRAFFT. PARTICIPANTS Sample (N = 132,555) averaged 16.19 (±1.21) years of age; 51.0% were female, 59.7% were White, 15.2% were Latino/Latina, and 6.7% were African-American. Majority resided in non-rural area and 34.5% were receiving free or reduced lunch at school. MEASUREMENTS Heavy cannabis use was defined as using cannabis 10 or more times in the past 30 days. Sensitivity, specificity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Youden value were analyzed to determine the ideal cut-off point. FINDINGS Maximum overall predictive accuracy was at a cutoff score of 2 or higher when using the original CRAFFT questions. At a cutoff score of 2, sensitivity was 82.0%, specificity was 83.7%, with an AUC of 0.880. On the contrary, when an alternative CAR question was used, maximum predictive accuracy was at a cutoff score of 1 or higher when predicting heavy cannabis use. At a cutoff score of 1, sensitivity was 92.7%, specificity was 75.5%, with an AUC of 0.900. CONCLUSIONS The results provide evidence that the CRAFFT is a promising brief diagnostic instrument for heavy cannabis use among youth. Modification to Car item may have potential in reducing disparities in sensitivity among different racial ethnic groups, as well as those who with low socioeconomic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol A Lee
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Social Work, 1010 W. Nevada St. Urbana, IL 61801, United States.
| | - Douglas C Smith
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Social Work, 1010 W. Nevada St. Urbana, IL 61801, United States
| | - Angus Lanker
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Social Work, 1010 W. Nevada St. Urbana, IL 61801, United States
| | - Kelly L Clary
- Texas State University, School of Social Work, 712 N. Comanche St., San Marcos, TX 78666, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burt TS, Brown TL, Milavetz G, McGehee DV. Mechanisms of cannabis impairment: Implications for modeling driving performance. Forensic Sci Int 2021; 328:110902. [PMID: 34634690 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Past research on cannabis has been limited in scope to THC potencies lower than legally available and efforts to integrate the effects into models of driving performance have not been attempted to date. The purpose of this systematic review is to understand the implications for modeling driving performance and describe future research needs. The risk of motor vehicle crashes increases 2-fold after smoking marijuana. Driving during acute cannabis intoxication impairs concentration, reaction time, along with a variety of other necessary driving-related skills. Changes to legislation in North America and abroad have led to an increase in cannabis' popularity. This has given rise to more potent strains, with higher THC concentrations than ever before. There is also rising usage of novel ingestion methods other than smoking, such as oral cannabis products (e.g., brownies, infused drinks, candies), vaping, and topicals. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to perform a systematic search of the PubMed database for peer-reviewed literature. Search terms were combined with keywords for driving performance: driving, performance, impairment. Grey literature was also reviewed, including congressional reports, committee reports, and roadside surveys. There is a large discrepancy between the types of cannabis products sold and what is researched. Almost all studies that used inhalation as the mode of ingestion with cannabis that is around 6% THC. This pales in comparison to the more potent strains being sold today which can exceed 20%. Which is to say nothing of extracts, which can contain 60% or more THC. Experimental protocol is another gap in research that needs to be filled. Methodologies that involve naturalistic (real world) driving environments, smoked rather than vaporized cannabis, and non-lab certified products introduce uncontrollable variables. When considering the available literature and the implications of modeling the impacts of cannabis on driving performance, two critical areas emerge that require additional research: The first is the role of cannabis potency. Second is the route of administration. Does the lower peak THC level result in smaller impacts on performance? How long does potential impairment last along the longer time-course associated with different pharmacokinetic profiles. It is critical for modeling efforts to understand the answers to these questions, accurately model the effects on driver performance, and by extension understand the risk to the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S Burt
- National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Timothy L Brown
- National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Gary Milavetz
- National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Daniel V McGehee
- National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bryant VE, Britton MK, Gullett JM, Porges EC, Woods AJ, Cook RL, Williamson J, Ennis N, Bryant KJ, Bradley C, Cohen RA. Reduced Working Memory is Associated with Heavier Alcohol Consumption History, Role Impairment and Executive Function Difficulties. AIDS Behav 2021; 25:2720-2727. [PMID: 33550519 PMCID: PMC8935631 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03170-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Both HIV status and heavy alcohol use have been associated with reduced cognitive function, particularly in the domains of working memory and executive function. It is unclear what aspects of working memory and executive function are associated with HIV status and heavy alcohol use and whether performance on these measures are associated with functional impairment. We examined the relationship between HIV, history of heavy alcohol consumption, and HIV/alcohol interaction on speeded tests of frontal inhibitory abilities, a working memory task related to mental manipulation of letters and numbers, cognitive flexibility, and measures of functional impairment. Study participants included 284 individuals (151 HIV +) recruited from two different studies focusing on HIV associated brain dysfunction, one specific to the effects of alcohol, the other specific to the effects of aging. HIV status was not independently associated with working memory and executive function measures. Higher level of alcohol consumption was associated with reduced performance on Letter Number Sequencing. Poorer Letter Number Sequencing performance was associated with role impairment (an inability to do certain kinds of work, housework, or schoolwork) and executive function difficulties. Future studies should examine causal associations and interventions targeting working memory abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaughn E Bryant
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Emerging Pathogens Institute, 2055 Mowry Road, P.O. Box 100009, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA.
| | - Mark K Britton
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| | - Joseph M Gullett
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| | - Eric C Porges
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| | - Adam J Woods
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| | - Robert L Cook
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Emerging Pathogens Institute, 2055 Mowry Road, P.O. Box 100009, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - John Williamson
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| | - Nicole Ennis
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, 2010 Levy Ave, Suite 254, Tallahassee, FL, 32310, USA
| | - Kendall J Bryant
- National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-6902, USA
| | - Carolyn Bradley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Emerging Pathogens Institute, 2055 Mowry Road, P.O. Box 100009, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Ronald A Cohen
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32607, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smetana GW, Tetrault JM, Hill KP, Burns RB. Should You Recommend Cannabinoids for This Patient With Painful Neuropathy? : Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:237-246. [PMID: 33556279 DOI: 10.7326/m20-7945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cannabis includes 140 active cannabinoid compounds, the most important of which are tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD). Tetrahydrocannabinol is primarily responsible for the intoxicating effects of cannabis; CBD has potential therapeutic effects, including reduction in chronic pain. Recent legislative changes have resulted in the legal availability of cannabinoids in all 50 states, as well as a marked increase in patients' interest in their use. Despite an abundance of data, albeit of varied quality, clinicians may feel poorly prepared to counsel patients seeking advice on the suitability of CBD products for various indications, particularly chronic neuropathic pain. In 2018, on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, a Canadian Evidence Review Group published a guideline with recommendations for clinicians on prescribing cannabinoids in primary care practice. The overall quality of evidence was low to very low. In a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials of medical cannabis for treating chronic pain, 39% of patients achieved at least a 30% reduction in pain. The corresponding value for placebo-treated patients was 30%; the number needed to treat was 11. More evidence exists for neuropathic pain than for other types of noncancer pain. Here, a general internist with a focus on addiction medicine and an addiction psychiatrist discuss how they would apply the literature to make recommendations for a patient with painful diabetic neuropathy, including counseling on both potential benefits and harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald W Smetana
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (G.W.S., K.P.H., R.B.B.)
| | | | - Kevin P Hill
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (G.W.S., K.P.H., R.B.B.)
| | - Risa B Burns
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (G.W.S., K.P.H., R.B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lorenzetti V, Takagi M, van Dalen Y, Yücel M, Solowij N. Investigating the Residual Effects of Chronic Cannabis Use and Abstinence on Verbal and Visuospatial Learning. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:663701. [PMID: 34220577 PMCID: PMC8247947 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.663701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Regular cannabis users have been shown to differ from non-using controls in learning performance. It is unclear if these differences are specific to distinct domains of learning (verbal, visuospatial), exacerbate with extent of cannabis exposure and dissipate with sustained abstinence. Objective: This study examines different domains of learning (verbal, visuospatial) in current and abstaining cannabis users, and the role of chronicity of use. Methods: In a cross-sectional design, we examined 127 psychiatrically healthy participants (65 female) with mean aged of 34 years. Of these, 69 individuals were current regular cannabis users (mean 15 years use), 12 were former cannabis users abstinent for ~2.5 yrs (after a mean of 16 years use), and 46 were non-cannabis using controls. Groups were compared on verbal learning performance assessed via the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II) and for visuospatial learning measured with the Brown Location Test (BLT). We explored the association between CVLT/BLT performance and cannabis use levels in current and former users. Results: Current cannabis use compared to non-use was associated with worse performance on select aspects of verbal learning (Long Delay Cued Recall) and of visuospatial learning (Retroactive Interference and LD Rotated Recall). Prolonged abstinence was associated with altered verbal learning but intact visuospatial learning. There were non-significant correlations between distinct cannabis use measures, age and learning in both current and former users. Conclusions: Our findings suggest cannabis use status (current use, former use) affects different domains of learning (verbal and visuospatial) in a distinct fashion. These findings might be accounted for in the design of cognitive interventions aimed to support abstinence in cannabis users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Lorenzetti
- Neuroscience of Addiction and Mental Health Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Takagi
- Child Neuropsychology Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yvonne van Dalen
- Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Murat Yücel
- BrainPark, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging Facility, The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadia Solowij
- School of Psychology and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Punia K, DeVillaer M, MacKillop J, Balodis IM. Understanding the Overlap Between Cannabis Use and Gambling Behaviour: A Systematic Review of Empirical Findings and Consideration of Policy Implications. CURRENT ADDICTION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40429-020-00323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
12
|
The Antimicrobial Activity of Cannabinoids. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:antibiotics9070406. [PMID: 32668669 PMCID: PMC7400265 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9070406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A post-antibiotic world is fast becoming a reality, given the rapid emergence of pathogens that are resistant to current drugs. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover new classes of potent antimicrobial agents with novel modes of action. Cannabis sativa is an herbaceous plant that has been used for millennia for medicinal and recreational purposes. Its bioactivity is largely due to a class of compounds known as cannabinoids. Recently, these natural products and their analogs have been screened for their antimicrobial properties, in the quest to discover new anti-infective agents. This paper seeks to review the research to date on cannabinoids in this context, including an analysis of structure-activity relationships. It is hoped that it will stimulate further interest in this important issue.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hwang EK, Lupica CR. Altered Corticolimbic Control of the Nucleus Accumbens by Long-term Δ 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure. Biol Psychiatry 2020; 87:619-631. [PMID: 31543247 PMCID: PMC7002212 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decriminalization and legalization of cannabis and the expansion of availability of medical cannabis in North America have led to an increase in cannabis use and the availability of high-potency strains. Cannabis potency is determined by the concentration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), a psychoactive constituent that activates cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. The use of high-potency cannabis is associated with cannabis use disorder and increased susceptibility to psychiatric illness. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is part of a brain reward circuit affected by Δ9-THC through modulation of glutamate afferents arising from corticolimbic brain areas implicated in drug addiction and psychiatric disorders. Moreover, brain imaging studies show alterations in corticolimbic and NAc properties in human cannabis users. METHODS Using in vitro electrophysiology and optogenetics, we examined how Δ9-THC alters corticolimbic input to the NAc in rats. RESULTS We found that long-term exposure to Δ9-THC weakens prefrontal cortex glutamate input to the NAc shell and strengthens input from basolateral amygdala and ventral hippocampus. Further, whereas long-term exposure to Δ9-THC had no effect on net strength of glutamatergic input to NAc shell arising from midbrain dopamine neurons, it alters fundamental properties of these synapses. CONCLUSIONS Long-term exposure to Δ9-THC shifts control of the NAc shell from cortical to limbic input, likely contributing to cognitive and psychiatric dysfunction that is associated with cannabis use.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bahji A, Stephenson C, Tyo R, Hawken ER, Seitz DP. Prevalence of Cannabis Withdrawal Symptoms Among People With Regular or Dependent Use of Cannabinoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e202370. [PMID: 32271390 PMCID: PMC7146100 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cannabis withdrawal syndrome (CWS)-a diagnostic indicator of cannabis use disorder-commonly occurs on cessation of heavy and prolonged cannabis use. To date, the prevalence of CWS syndrome has not been well described, nor have the factors potentially associated with CWS. OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of CWS among individuals with regular or dependent use of cannabinoids and identify factors associated with CWS. DATA SOURCES A search of literature from database inception to June 19, 2019, was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest, Allied and Complementary Medicine, and Psychiatry online, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included articles. STUDY SELECTION Articles were included if they (1) were published in English, (2) reported on individuals with regular use of cannabinoids or cannabis use disorder as a primary study group, (3) reported on the prevalence of CWS or CWS symptoms using a validated instrument, (4) reported the prevalence of CWS, and (5) used an observational study design (eg, cohort or cross-sectional). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS All abstracts, full-text articles, and other sources were reviewed, with data extracted in duplicate. Cannabis withdrawal syndrome prevalence was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis model, alongside stratification and meta-regression to characterize heterogeneity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cannabis withdrawal syndrome prevalence was reported as a percentage with 95% CIs. RESULTS Of 3848 unique abstracts, 86 were selected for full-text review, and 47 studies, representing 23 518 participants, met all inclusion criteria. Of 23 518 participants included in the analysis, 16 839 were white (72%) and 14 387 were men (69%); median (SD) age was 29.9 (9.0) years. The overall pooled prevalence of CWS was 47% (6469 of 23 518) (95% CI, 41%-52%), with significant heterogeneity between estimates (I2 = 99.2%). When stratified by source, the prevalence of CWS was 17% (95% CI, 13%-21%) in population-based samples, 54% in outpatient samples (95% CI, 48%-59%), and 87% in inpatient samples (95% CI, 79%-94%), which were significantly different (P < .001). Concurrent cannabis (β = 0.005, P < .001), tobacco (β = 0.002, P = .02), and other substance use disorders (β = 0.003, P = .05) were associated with a higher CWS prevalence, as was daily cannabis use (β = 0.004, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that cannabis withdrawal syndrome appears to be prevalent among regular users of cannabis. Clinicians should be aware of the prevalence of CWS in order to counsel patients and support individuals who are reducing their use of cannabis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anees Bahji
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Callum Stephenson
- Queen’s University School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard Tyo
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily R. Hawken
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dallas P. Seitz
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chung T, Bae SW, Mun EY, Suffoletto B, Nishiyama Y, Jang S, Dey AK. Mobile Assessment of Acute Effects of Marijuana on Cognitive Functioning in Young Adults: Observational Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e16240. [PMID: 32154789 PMCID: PMC7093776 DOI: 10.2196/16240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile assessment of the effects of acute marijuana on cognitive functioning in the natural environment would provide an ecologically valid measure of the impacts of marijuana use on daily functioning. Objective This study aimed to examine the association of reported acute subjective marijuana high (rated 0-10) with performance on 3 mobile cognitive tasks measuring visuospatial working memory (Flowers task), attentional bias to marijuana-related cues (marijuana Stroop), and information processing and psychomotor speed (digit symbol substitution task [DSST]). The effect of distraction as a moderator of the association between the rating of subjective marijuana high and task performance (ie, reaction time and number of correct responses) was explored. Methods Young adults (aged 18-25 years; 37/60, 62% female) who reported marijuana use at least twice per week were recruited through advertisements and a participant registry in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Phone surveys and mobile cognitive tasks were delivered 3 times per day and were self-initiated when starting marijuana use. Completion of phone surveys triggered the delivery of cognitive tasks. Participants completed up to 30 days of daily data collection. Multilevel models examined associations between ratings of subjective marijuana high (rated 0-10) and performance on each cognitive task (reaction time and number of correct responses) and tested the number of distractions (rated 0-4) during the mobile task session as a moderator of the association between ratings of subjective marijuana high and task performance. Results Participants provided 2703 data points, representing 451 reports (451/2703, 16.7%) of marijuana use. Consistent with slight impairing effects of acute marijuana use, an increase in the average rating of subjective marijuana high was associated with slower average reaction time on all 3 tasks—Flowers (B=2.29; SE 0.86; P=.008), marijuana Stroop (B=2.74; SE 1.09; P=.01), and DSST (B=3.08; SE 1.41; P=.03)—and with fewer correct responses for Flowers (B=−0.03; SE 0.01; P=.01) and DSST (B=−0.18; SE 0.07; P=.01), but not marijuana Stroop (P=.45). Results for distraction as a moderator were statistically significant only for certain cognitive tasks and outcomes. Specifically, as hypothesized, a person’s average number of reported distractions moderated the association of the average rating of subjective marijuana high (over and above a session’s rating) with the reaction time for marijuana Stroop (B=−52.93; SE 19.38; P=.006) and DSST (B=−109.72; SE 42.50; P=.01) and the number of correct responses for marijuana Stroop (B=−0.22; SE 0.10; P=.02) and DSST (B=4.62; SE 1.81; P=.01). Conclusions Young adults’ performance on mobile cognitive tasks in the natural environment was associated with ratings of acute subjective marijuana high, consistent with slight decreases in cognitive functioning. Monitoring cognitive functioning in real time in the natural environment holds promise for providing immediate feedback to guide personal decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy Chung
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Sang Won Bae
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, United States
| | - Eun-Young Mun
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Brian Suffoletto
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Yuuki Nishiyama
- Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Serim Jang
- Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Anind K Dey
- Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maharajan MK, Yong YJ, Yip HY, Woon SS, Yeap KM, Yap KY, Yip SC, Yap KX. Medical cannabis for chronic pain: can it make a difference in pain management? J Anesth 2019; 34:95-103. [DOI: 10.1007/s00540-019-02680-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
17
|
Cyr M, Tau GZ, Fontaine M, Levin FR, Marsh R. Deficient Functioning of Frontostriatal Circuits During the Resolution of Cognitive Conflict in Cannabis-Using Youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 58:702-711. [PMID: 30768406 PMCID: PMC6506393 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.09.436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Disturbances in self-regulatory control are involved in the initiation and maintenance of addiction, including cannabis use disorder. In adults, long-term cannabis use is associated with disturbances in frontostriatal circuits during tasks that require the engagement of self-regulatory control, including the resolution of cognitive conflict. Understudied are the behavioral and neural correlates of these processes earlier in the course of cannabis use disentangled from effects of long-term use. The present study investigated the functioning of frontostriatal circuits during the resolution of cognitive conflict in cannabis-using youth. METHOD Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired from 28 cannabis-using youth and 32 age-matched healthy participants during the performance of a Simon task. General linear modeling was used to compare patterns of brain activation during correct responses to conflict stimuli across groups. Psychophysiologic interaction analyses were used to examine conflict-related frontostriatal connectivity across groups. Associations of frontostriatal activation and connectivity with cannabis use measures were explored. RESULTS Decreased conflict-related activity was detected in cannabis-using versus healthy control youth in frontostriatal regions, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, striatum, pallidum, and thalamus. Frontostriatal connectivity did not differ across groups, but negative connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and striatum was detected in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION These findings are consistent with previous reports of cannabis-associated disturbances in frontostriatal circuits in adults and point to the specific influence of cannabis on neurodevelopmental changes in youth. Future studies should examine whether frontostriatal functioning is a reliable marker of cannabis use disorder severity and a potential target for circuit-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn Cyr
- New York State Psychiatric Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fu R, Coyte PC. Impact of Predialysis Psychosocial Conditions on Kidney Transplant Recipient Survival: Evidence Using Propensity Score Matching. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019; 6:2054358119859897. [PMID: 31285831 PMCID: PMC6600500 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119859897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: An increased number of end-stage renal disease patients suffer psychosocial
conditions and may experience delayed access to transplantation due to
listing restrictions. However, it remains to be shown whether preexisting
psychosocial conditions confer an independent risk factor of poor
posttransplant outcomes. Objective: We addressed this gap in knowledge by conducting a retrospective cohort study
to investigate an independent association between the risk of death after
transplant and having a diagnosis of psychosocial conditions 1 year prior to
starting dialysis. Methods: All cases of adult deceased-donor kidney transplantation performed in
Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2013, were used.
Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for potential endogenous
bias of using predialysis psychosocial status to predict posttransplant
mortality. Survival analysis techniques, including Kaplan-Meier curves and
Cox proportional hazards modeling, were also used. Results: Our results indicate a 49.4% (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.494 [95% confidence
interval (CI) = 1.168-1.913]) increased relative risk of posttransplant
death to be associated with predialysis psychosocial conditions, when other
factors are held constant. The effect is significant (P =
.001) and is independent of other known predictors of death including
advanced age. Conclusions: Findings from this study offered strong support for the development of
psychosocial evaluation to screen candidates prior to transplant listing and
early interventions for transplant candidates with psychosocial
concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Fu
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Health Economics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter C Coyte
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Canadian Centre for Health Economics, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ashton JC. Is Cannabis Harmless? Focus on Brain Function. Curr Drug Res Rev 2019; 11:33-39. [PMID: 30829178 DOI: 10.2174/2589977511666180809165622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The degree to which cannabis use causes long term harm to mental functioning is contentious. OBJECTIVE To determine the evidence for residual and long term effects of cannabis use on mental functions. METHOD Comprehensively review human studies addressing detrimental effects on human mental and life functioning. RESULTS Heavy use causes immediate effects on perception, mood and sedation, but also deficits in cognitive ability. But cessation following heavy use has withdrawal effects and is associated with residual effects on cognition that may last for several weeks. Heavy use also raises the risk of impoverishment of life outcomes and a decline in socioeconomic status as well as the risk of mental health problems. Young age at the start of heavy cannabis use causes a risk of lifelong detrimental effects, and as a worst case together with genetic vulnerability exacerbate a predisposition to schizophrenia. CONCLUSION Heavy regular use of cannabis that begins in adolescence heightens the risk of longterm impairment of life and mental functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Ashton
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Otago School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
µ-Opioid receptor agonists are commonly used to treat pain despite their adverse effects. In preclinical studies, cannabinoid receptor agonists increase the potency of opioids for producing antinociceptive but not reinforcing effects. It is unknown whether other adverse effects of these drugs, such as impairment of complex behavior, are enhanced by their co-administration. This study characterized the effects of morphine (µ-opioid receptor agonist; 0.32-5.6 mg/kg, subcutaneously) and CP55940 (CB1/CB2 cannabinoid receptor agonist; 0.0032-0.32 mg/kg, subcutaneously), alone and in mixtures, in monkeys (n=3) choosing between one pellet delivered immediately and two pellets delivered after a delay. Two consecutive choices of the immediate or delayed reward decreased or increased, respectively, the delay. The median adjusted delay, indicating indifference between the immediate and delayed reinforcers, was increased by morphine (3.2 mg/kg) and CP55940 (0.01-0.032 mg/kg). Performance after administration of morphine (0.32 and 1 mg/kg)/CP55940 (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg) mixtures was not different from performance after CP55940 alone. Neither morphine, CP55940, nor mixtures decreased the median adjusted delay (i.e. increased impulsivity). These findings failed to confirm previous studies showing that morphine increases impulsivity, perhaps because of procedural differences among studies. Treatment of pain often requires repeated drug administration; thus, it remains to be determined whether the present findings predict the effects of chronically administered morphine/CP5540 mixtures on impulsive choice.
Collapse
|
21
|
Guerrero-Alba R, Barragán-Iglesias P, González-Hernández A, Valdez-Moráles EE, Granados-Soto V, Condés-Lara M, Rodríguez MG, Marichal-Cancino BA. Some Prospective Alternatives for Treating Pain: The Endocannabinoid System and Its Putative Receptors GPR18 and GPR55. Front Pharmacol 2019; 9:1496. [PMID: 30670965 PMCID: PMC6331465 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Marijuana extracts (cannabinoids) have been used for several millennia for pain treatment. Regarding the site of action, cannabinoids are highly promiscuous molecules, but only two cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) have been deeply studied and classified. Thus, therapeutic actions, side effects and pharmacological targets for cannabinoids have been explained based on the pharmacology of cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptors. However, the accumulation of confusing and sometimes contradictory results suggests the existence of other cannabinoid receptors. Different orphan proteins (e.g., GPR18, GPR55, GPR119, etc.) have been proposed as putative cannabinoid receptors. According to their expression, GPR18 and GPR55 could be involved in sensory transmission and pain integration. Methods: This article reviews select relevant information about the potential role of GPR18 and GPR55 in the pathophysiology of pain. Results: This work summarized novel data supporting that, besides cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors, GPR18 and GPR55 may be useful for pain treatment. Conclusion: There is evidence to support an antinociceptive role for GPR18 and GPR55.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Guerrero-Alba
- Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
| | - Paulino Barragán-Iglesias
- School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States
| | - Abimael González-Hernández
- Departamento de Neurobiología del Desarrollo y Neurofisiología, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico
| | - Eduardo E Valdez-Moráles
- Cátedras CONACYT, Departamento de Cirugía, Centro de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
| | - Vinicio Granados-Soto
- Neurobiology of Pain Laboratory, Departamento de Farmacobiología, Cinvestav, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Miguel Condés-Lara
- Departamento de Neurobiología del Desarrollo y Neurofisiología, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Santiago de Querétaro, Mexico
| | - Martín G Rodríguez
- Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
| | - Bruno A Marichal-Cancino
- Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bloomfield MAP, Hindocha C, Green SF, Wall MB, Lees R, Petrilli K, Costello H, Ogunbiyi MO, Bossong MG, Freeman TP. The neuropsychopharmacology of cannabis: A review of human imaging studies. Pharmacol Ther 2018; 195:132-161. [PMID: 30347211 PMCID: PMC6416743 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The laws governing cannabis are evolving worldwide and associated with changing patterns of use. The main psychoactive drug in cannabis is Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a partial agonist at the endocannabinoid CB1 receptor. Acutely, cannabis and THC produce a range of effects on several neurocognitive and pharmacological systems. These include effects on executive, emotional, reward and memory processing via direct interactions with the endocannabinoid system and indirect effects on the glutamatergic, GABAergic and dopaminergic systems. Cannabidiol, a non-intoxicating cannabinoid found in some forms of cannabis, may offset some of these acute effects. Heavy repeated cannabis use, particularly during adolescence, has been associated with adverse effects on these systems, which increase the risk of mental illnesses including addiction and psychosis. Here, we provide a comprehensive state of the art review on the acute and chronic neuropsychopharmacology of cannabis by synthesizing the available neuroimaging research in humans. We describe the effects of drug exposure during development, implications for understanding psychosis and cannabis use disorder, and methodological considerations. Greater understanding of the precise mechanisms underlying the effects of cannabis may also give rise to new treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A P Bloomfield
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Chandni Hindocha
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian F Green
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew B Wall
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom; Invicro UK, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Lees
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Petrilli
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Harry Costello
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - M Olabisi Ogunbiyi
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthijs G Bossong
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tom P Freeman
- Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, United Kingdom; National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Trigo JM, Soliman A, Quilty LC, Fischer B, Rehm J, Selby P, Barnes AJ, Huestis MA, George TP, Streiner DL, Staios G, Le Foll B. Nabiximols combined with motivational enhancement/cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of cannabis dependence: A pilot randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0190768. [PMID: 29385147 PMCID: PMC5791962 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current lack of pharmacological treatments for cannabis use disorder (CUD) warrants novel approaches and further investigation of promising pharmacotherapy. We previously showed that nabiximols (27 mg/ml Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)/ 25 mg/ml cannabidiol (CBD), Sativex®) can decrease cannabis withdrawal symptoms. Here, we assessed in a pilot study the tolerability and safety of self-titrated nabiximols vs. placebo among 40 treatment-seeking cannabis-dependent participants. METHODS Subjects participated in a double blind randomized clinical trial, with as-needed nabiximols up to 113.4 mg THC/105 mg CBD or placebo daily for 12 weeks, concurrently with Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (MET/CBT). Primary outcome measures were tolerability and abstinence, secondary outcome measures were days and amount of cannabis use, withdrawal, and craving scores. Participants received up to CDN$ 855 in compensation for their time. RESULTS Medication was well tolerated and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed. Rates of adverse events did not differ between treatment arms (F1,39 = 0.205, NS). There was no significant change in abstinence rates at trial end. Participants were not able to differentiate between subjective effects associated with nabiximols or placebo treatments (F1,40 = 0.585, NS). Cannabis use was reduced in the nabiximols (70.5%) and placebo groups (42.6%). Nabiximols reduced cannabis craving but no significant differences between the nabiximols and placebo groups were observed on withdrawal scores. CONCLUSIONS Nabiximols in combination with MET/CBT was well tolerated and allowed for reduction of cannabis use. Future clinical trials should explore the potential of high doses of nabiximols for cannabis dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M. Trigo
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandra Soliman
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada
| | - Lena C. Quilty
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
- Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health & Addiction, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
- Addiction Policy, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy & Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Longitudinal Studies (CELOS), Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Selby
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Addictions Division, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Allan J. Barnes
- Chemistry and Drug Metabolism, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, United States of America
| | - Marilyn A. Huestis
- Chemistry and Drug Metabolism, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, United States of America
| | - Tony P. George
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Addictions Division, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Brain and Therapeutics, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
| | - David L. Streiner
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gregory Staios
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada
- Addictions Division, CAMH, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nusbaum AT, Whitney P, Cuttler C, Spradlin A, Hinson JM, McLaughlin RJ. Altered attentional control strategies but spared executive functioning in chronic cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 181:116-123. [PMID: 29045919 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use has increased rapidly in recent decades. The increase in cannabis use makes it important to understand the potential influence of chronic use on attentional control and other executive functions (EFs). Because cannabis is often used to reduce stress, and because stress can constrain attentional control and EFs, the primary goal of this study was to determine the joint effect of acute stress and chronic cannabis use on specific EFs. METHODS Thirty-nine cannabis users and 40 non-users were assigned to either a stress or no stress version of the Maastricht Acute Stress Test. Participants then completed two cognitive tasks that involve EFs: (1) task switching, and (2) a novel Flexible Attentional Control Task. These two tasks provided assessments of vigilant attention, inhibitory control, top-down attentional control, and cognitive flexibility. Salivary cortisol was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS Reaction time indices showed an interaction between stress and cannabis use on top-down attentional control (p=0.036, np2=0.059). Follow-up tests showed that cannabis users relied less on top-down attentional control than did non-users in the no stress version. Despite not relying on top-down control, the cannabis users showed no overall performance deficits on the tasks. CONCLUSIONS Chronic cannabis users performed cognitive tasks involving EFs as well as non-users while not employing cognitive control processes that are typical for such tasks. These results indicate alterations in cognitive processing in cannabis users, but such alterations do not necessarily lead to global performance deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy T Nusbaum
- Washington State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
| | - Paul Whitney
- Washington State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
| | - Carrie Cuttler
- Washington State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA; Translational Addiction Research Center, Washington State University, USA.
| | - Alexander Spradlin
- Washington State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
| | - John M Hinson
- Washington State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
| | - Ryan J McLaughlin
- Washington State University, Department of Psychology, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA; Translational Addiction Research Center, Washington State University, USA; Washington State University, Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, WA, 99164-7620, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Effects of Adolescent Cannabinoid Self-Administration in Rats on Addiction-Related Behaviors and Working Memory. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017; 42:989-1000. [PMID: 27582345 PMCID: PMC5506802 DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Use of marijuana (Cannabis sativa) often begins in adolescence, and heavy adolescent marijuana use is often associated with impaired cognitive function in adulthood. However, clinical reports of long-lasting cognitive deficits, particularly in subjects who discontinue use in adulthood, are mixed. Moreover, dissociating innate differences in cognitive function from cannabis-induced deficits is challenging. Therefore, the current study sought to develop a rodent model of adolescent cannabinoid self-administration (SA), using the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN), in order to assess measures of relapse/reinstatement of drug seeking and long-term effects on cognitive function assessed in a delay-match-to-sample working memory task and a spatial recognition task. Adolescent male rats readily self-administered WIN in 2-h or 6-h sessions/day, but did not demonstrate an escalation of intake with 6-h access. Rats exhibited significant cue-induced reinstatement of WIN seeking that increased with 21 days of abstinence (ie, 'incubation of craving'). Cognitive testing occurred in adulthood under drug-free conditions. Both 2-h and 6-h adolescent WIN SA groups exhibited significantly better working memory performance in adulthood relative to sucrose SA controls, and performance was associated with altered expression of proteins regulating GABAergic and glutamatergic signaling in the prefrontal cortex. Self-administered WIN did not produce either acute or chronic effects on short-term memory, but experimenter administration of WIN in adolescence, at doses previously reported in the literature, produced acute deficits in short-term memory that recovered with abstinence. Thus, SA of a rewarding cannabinoid in adolescence does not produce long-term cognitive dysfunction.
Collapse
|
26
|
Savage SR, Romero-Sandoval A, Schatman M, Wallace M, Fanciullo G, McCarberg B, Ware M. Cannabis in Pain Treatment: Clinical and Research Considerations. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2016; 17:654-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Revised: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
27
|
MacDonald K, Pappas K. WHY NOT POT?: A Review of the Brain-based Risks of Cannabis. INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE 2016; 13:13-22. [PMID: 27354924 PMCID: PMC4911936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we provide a historical perspective on marijuana, and survey contemporary research investigating its potential negative effects on the brain. We discuss the evidence regarding cannabis dependence, driving under the influence of cannabis, underachievement, inducing (or worsening) certain psychiatric conditions, and the potential for progression to use of more dangerous drugs-summarized by the acronym DDUMB, a cognitive tool that may help healthcare providers in their risk/benefit discussions with patients who use cannabis. We also review and discuss the impact of marijuana use on target populations, including adolescents (who are at increased risk of harm); heavy users; and people suffering from-or at high risk of- mental illness. While cannabis presents certain subjective, healthrelated, and pecuniary benefits to users, growers, and other entities, it is also associated with several brainbased risks. Understanding these risks aids clinicians and their patients in making informed and balanced decisions regarding the initiation or continuance of marijuana use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai MacDonald
- Dr. MacDonald and Ms. Pappas are with UC San Diego Psychiatry, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Pappas
- Dr. MacDonald and Ms. Pappas are with UC San Diego Psychiatry, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Carey SE, Nestor L, Jones J, Garavan H, Hester R. Impaired learning from errors in cannabis users: Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and hippocampus hypoactivity. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015; 155:175-82. [PMID: 26249266 PMCID: PMC4581978 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Revised: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The chronic use of cannabis has been associated with error processing dysfunction, in particular, hypoactivity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) during the processing of cognitive errors. Given the role of such activity in influencing post-error adaptive behaviour, we hypothesised that chronic cannabis users would have significantly poorer learning from errors. METHODS Fifteen chronic cannabis users (four females, mean age=22.40 years, SD=4.29) and 15 control participants (two females, mean age=23.27 years, SD=3.67) were administered a paired associate learning task that enabled participants to learn from their errors, during fMRI data collection. RESULTS Compared with controls, chronic cannabis users showed (i) a lower recall error-correction rate and (ii) hypoactivity in the dACC and left hippocampus during the processing of error-related feedback and re-encoding of the correct response. The difference in error-related dACC activation between cannabis users and healthy controls varied as a function of error type, with the control group showing a significantly greater difference between corrected and repeated errors than the cannabis group. CONCLUSIONS The present results suggest that chronic cannabis users have poorer learning from errors, with the failure to adapt performance associated with hypoactivity in error-related dACC and hippocampal regions. The findings highlight a consequence of performance monitoring dysfunction in drug abuse and the potential consequence this cognitive impairment has for the symptom of failing to learn from negative feedback seen in cannabis and other forms of dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Carey
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liam Nestor
- School of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jennifer Jones
- School of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hugh Garavan
- School of Psychology and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland,Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Vermont, USA
| | - Robert Hester
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gruber SA, Sagar KA, Dahlgren MK, Gonenç A, Conn NA, Winer JP, Penetar D, Lukas SE. Citicoline Treatment Improves Measures of Impulsivity and Task Performance in Chronic Marijuana Smokers: A Pilot BOLD fMRI Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY AND NEUROTHERAPY 2015; 2:1-8. [PMID: 26658924 PMCID: PMC4674830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Citicoline is an endogenous nucleotide that has historically been used to treat stroke, traumatic brain injury, and cognitive dysfunction. Research has also shown that citicoline treatment is associated with improved cognitive performance in substance-abusing populations. We hypothesized that marijuana (MJ) smokers who received citicoline would demonstrate improvement in cognitive performance as well as increased neural efficiency during tasks of cognitive control relative to those who received placebo. METHOD The current study tested this hypothesis by examining the effects of citicoline in treatment-seeking chronic MJ smokers. In an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 19 MJ smokers were randomly assigned via a double-blind procedure to the citicoline (8 Males, 2 Females) or placebo group (9 Males, 0 Females). All participants completed fMRI scanning at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment during two cognitive measures of inhibitory processing, the Multi Source Interference Test (MSIT) and Stroop Color Word Test, and also completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), a self-report measure of impulsivity. RESULTS Following the 8 week trial, MJ smokers treated with citicoline demonstrated significantly lower levels of behavioral impulsivity, improved task accuracy on both the MSIT and Stroop tasks, and exhibited significantly different patterns of brain activation relative to baseline levels and relative to those who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that citicoline may facilitate the treatment of MJ use disorders by improving the cognitive skills necessary to fully engage in comprehensive treatment programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Staci A. Gruber
- Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Core, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly A. Sagar
- Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Core, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
| | | | - Atilla Gonenç
- Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Core, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nina A. Conn
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey P. Winer
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - David Penetar
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Behavioral Pharmacology Research Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - Scott E. Lukas
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Behavioral Pharmacology Research Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Persistent effects of chronic Δ9-THC exposure on motor impulsivity in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2015; 232:3033-43. [PMID: 25925779 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-015-3942-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE In humans, long-term marijuana use is associated with impaired impulse control and attentional capacity, though it has been difficult to distinguish pre-existing cognitive deficits from possible consequences of prolonged marijuana exposure. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of long-term exposure to Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the primary psychoactive constituent in marijuana, on indices of impulse control and attentional capacity using the rat 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-CSRTT). METHODS Ten 14-day cycles of Δ9-THC dosing and 5-CSRTT testing were employed, each comprised of 5-day Δ9-THC dosing (0.3 or 3 mg/kg b.i.d.) and 5-CSRTT testing during the 9 days of drug abstinence. Subsequent 5-CSRTT testing continued during 5 weeks of protracted abstinence. RESULTS Dose-dependent increases in motor impulsivity (premature responses) and behavioral disinhibition (perseverative responses) emerged following 5 cycles of Δ9-THC exposure that persisted for the remaining dosing and testing cycles. Δ9-THC-related disruptions in motor impulsivity and behavioral inhibition were most pronounced during cognitively challenging 5-CSRTT sessions incorporating varying novel inter-trial intervals (ITIs), and these disruptions persisted for at least 5 weeks of Δ9-THC abstinence. Δ9-THC-related impairments in attentional capacity (response accuracy) were also evident during variable ITI challenge tests, though these attentional disruptions abated within 3 weeks of Δ9-THC abstinence. CONCLUSIONS These observations demonstrate that long-term intermittent exposure to clinically meaningful Δ9-THC doses induces persistent impairments in impulse control and attentional function. If present in humans, these disruptions may impact academic and professional performance.
Collapse
|
31
|
The prevalence of cannabis withdrawal and its influence on adolescents' treatment response and outcomes: a 12-month prospective investigation. J Addict Med 2015; 8:359-67. [PMID: 25100311 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Withdrawal, a diagnostic indicator of cannabis use disorder, is often minimized or ignored as a consequence of cannabis use, particularly among adolescents. This study aims to characterize cannabis withdrawal among adolescents in outpatient treatment for substance use disorder and evaluate the clinical significance of withdrawal as a predictor of substance-related outcomes. METHODS Adolescent outpatients (N = 127) reporting cannabis as their drug of choice (n = 90) were stratified by the presence of withdrawal and compared on demographic and clinical variables at treatment intake. Hierarchical linear models compared the effect of withdrawal on percentage days abstinent (PDA) and related outcomes over a 1-year follow-up period. RESULTS Adolescents reporting withdrawal (40%) were more likely to meet criteria for cannabis dependence, have higher levels of substance use severity, report more substance-related consequences, and have a mood disorder. Withdrawal was not associated with PDA over the follow-up period; however, this relationship was moderated by problem recognition such that adolescents reporting withdrawal and a drug problem improved at a greater rate with respect to PDA than those who did not recognize a problem with drugs and did not report withdrawal. DISCUSSION Withdrawal is common among adolescent outpatients and is associated with a more clinically severe profile. In this sample, all adolescents reporting withdrawal met criteria for cannabis dependence, suggesting that withdrawal is a highly specific indicator of cannabis use disorder. Although withdrawal does not seem to be independently associated with substance use outcomes posttreatment, moderating factors such as drug problem recognition should be taken into account when formulating treatment and continuing care plans.
Collapse
|
32
|
Nair MP, Figueroa G, Casteleiro G, Muñoz K, Agudelo M. Alcohol Versus Cannabinoids: A Review of Their Opposite Neuro-Immunomodulatory Effects and Future Therapeutic Potentials. JOURNAL OF ALCOHOLISM AND DRUG DEPENDENCE 2015; 3:184. [PMID: 26478902 PMCID: PMC4607066 DOI: 10.4172/2329-6488.1000184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Due to the legalization of marijuana and the increased demand for cannabis and alcohol consumption, research efforts highlighting the biomedical consequences of the use of alcohol and cannabinoids are not only relevant to the substance abuse scientific field, but are also of public health interest. Moreover, an overview of the recent literature about alcohol and cannabinoids neuro-immunomodulatory effects highlighting their future therapeutic potentials will provide a significant contribution to science and medicine. Therefore, in the current review, we will first discuss briefly the prevalence of alcohol and marijuana abuse, followed by a discussion on the individual effects of alcohol and cannabinoids on the immune system; then, we will focus on the role of endocannabinoids on the alcohol-induced inflammatory effects. In addition, the review also incorporates cytokine array data obtained from human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, providing a different perspective on the alcohol and cannabinoid abuse divergent effects on cytokine production. The final section will highlight the therapeutic potential of cannabinoid receptors and the novel strategies to treat alcohol dependence as determined by in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhavan P. Nair
- Department of Immunology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, AHC-I 417-B, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Gloria Figueroa
- Department of Immunology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, AHC-I 417-B, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Gianna Casteleiro
- Department of Immunology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, AHC-I 417-B, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Karla Muñoz
- Department of Immunology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, AHC-I 417-B, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| | - Marisela Agudelo
- Department of Immunology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, AHC-I 417-B, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roebke PV, Vadhan NP, Brooks DJ, Levin FR. Verbal learning in marijuana users seeking treatment: a comparison between depressed and non-depressed samples. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2014; 40:274-9. [PMID: 24918839 DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2013.875551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both individuals with marijuana use and depressive disorders exhibit verbal learning and memory decrements. OBJECTIVES This study investigated the interaction between marijuana dependence and depression on learning and memory performance. METHODS The California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) was administered to depressed (n = 71) and non-depressed (n = 131) near-daily marijuana users. The severity of depressive symptoms was measured by the self-rated Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and the clinician-rated Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Multivariate analyses of covariance statistics (MANCOVA) were employed to analyze group differences in cognitive performance. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relative associations between marijuana use, depression and CVLT-II performance. Findings from each group were compared to published normative data. RESULTS Although both groups exhibited decreased CVLT-II performance relative to the test's normative sample (p < 0.05), marijuana-dependent subjects with a depressive disorder did not perform differently than marijuana-dependent subjects without a depressive disorder (p > 0.05). Further, poorer CVLT-II performance was modestly associated with increased self-reported daily amount of marijuana use (corrected p < 0.002), but was not significantly associated with increased scores on measures of depressive symptoms (corrected p > 0.002). CONCLUSION These findings suggest an inverse association between marijuana use and verbal learning function, but not between depression and verbal learning function in regular marijuana users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick V Roebke
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons , New York and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bihlar Muld B, Jokinen J, Bölte S, Hirvikoski T. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders with co-existing substance use disorder is characterized by early antisocial behaviour and poor cognitive skills. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13:336. [PMID: 24330331 PMCID: PMC3878757 DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Accepted: 12/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with an increased risk of co-existing substance abuse. The Swedish legislation on compulsory healthcare can be applied to persons with severe substance abuse who can be treated involuntarily during a period of six months. This context enables a reliable clinical assessment of ADHD in individuals with severe substance use disorder (SUD). METHODS In the context of compulsory care for individuals with severe SUD, male patients were assessed for ADHD, co-morbid psychiatric symptoms, psychosocial background, treatment history, and cognition. The data from the ADHD/SUD group (n = 60) was compared with data from (1) a group of individuals with severe substance abuse without known ADHD (SUD group, n = 120), as well as (2) a group with ADHD from an outpatient psychiatric clinic (ADHD/Psych group, n = 107). RESULTS Compared to the general SUD group in compulsory care, the ADHD/SUD group had already been significantly more often in compulsory care during childhood or adolescence, as well as imprisoned more often as adults. The most common preferred abused substance in the ADHD/SUD group was stimulant drugs, while alcohol and benzodiazepine abuse was more usual in the general SUD group. Compared to the ADHD/Psych group, the ADHD/SUD group reported more ADHD symptoms during childhood and performed poorer on all tests of general intellectual ability and executive functions. CONCLUSIONS The clinical characteristics of the ADHD/SUD group differed from those of both the SUD group and the ADHD/Psych group in several respects, indicating that ADHD in combination with SUD is a particularly disabling condition. The combination of severe substance abuse, poor general cognitive ability, severe psychosocial problems, including indications of antisocial behaviour, and other co-existing psychiatric conditions should be considered in treatment planning for adults with ADHD and SUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berit Bihlar Muld
- SiS LVM Institution Hornö, Enköping, Sweden,Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Pediatric Neuropsychiatry Unit, Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders at Karolinska Institutet (KIND), Stockholm, Gävlegatan 22B, SE-113 30, Sweden
| | - Jussi Jokinen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Bölte
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Pediatric Neuropsychiatry Unit, Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders at Karolinska Institutet (KIND), Stockholm, Gävlegatan 22B, SE-113 30, Sweden
| | - Tatja Hirvikoski
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Pediatric Neuropsychiatry Unit, Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders at Karolinska Institutet (KIND), Stockholm, Gävlegatan 22B, SE-113 30, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Decreased frontal N-acetylaspartate levels in adolescents concurrently using both methamphetamine and marijuana. Behav Brain Res 2013; 246:154-61. [PMID: 23466689 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2012] [Revised: 02/20/2013] [Accepted: 02/25/2013] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The potential neurochemical toxicity associated with methamphetamine (MA) or marijuana (MJ) use on the developing adolescent brain is unclear, particularly with regard to individuals with concomitant use of MA and MJ (MA+MJ). In this study, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was utilized to measure in vivo brain N-acetylaspartate plus N-acetylaspartyl glutamate (tNAA, an indicator of intact neuronal integrity) levels. METHODS Three adolescent groups from Cape Town, South Africa completed MRS scans as well as clinical measures including a drug use history. Subjects included (1) nine MA (age=15.7±1.37), (2) eight MA+MJ (age=16.2±1.16) using adolescents and (3) ten healthy controls (age=16.8±0.62). Single voxel spectra were acquired from midfrontal gray matter using a point-resolved spectroscopy sequence (PRESS). The MRS data were post-processed in the fully automated approach for quantitation of metabolite ratios to phosphocreatine plus creatine (PCr+Cr). RESULTS A significant reduction in frontal tNAA/PCr+Cr ratios was seen in the MA+MJ group compared to the healthy controls (p=0.01, by 7.2%) and to the MA group (p=0.04, by 6.9%). Significant relationships were also observed between decreased tNAA/PCr+Cr ratios and drug use history of MA or MJ (total cumulative lifetime dose, age of onset, and duration of MA and MJ exposure) only in the MA+MJ group (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that in adolescents, concomitant heavy MA+MJ use may contribute to altered brain metabolites in frontal gray matter. The significant associations between the abnormal tNAA/PCr+Cr ratios and the drug use history suggest that MA+MJ abuse may induce neurotoxicity in a dose-responsive manner in adolescent brain.
Collapse
|
36
|
Wright MJ, Vandewater SA, Parsons LH, Taffe MA. Δ(9)Tetrahydrocannabinol impairs reversal learning but not extra-dimensional shifts in rhesus macaques. Neuroscience 2013; 235:51-8. [PMID: 23333671 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2012] [Revised: 12/19/2012] [Accepted: 01/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Expansion of medical marijuana use in the US and the recently successful decriminalization of recreational marijuana in two States elevates interest in the specific cognitive effects of Δ(9)tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)THC), the major psychoactive constituent of marijuana. Controlled laboratory studies in nonhuman primates provide mixed evidence for specific effects of Δ(9)THC in learning and memory tasks, with a suggestion that frontal-mediated tasks may be the most sensitive. In this study, adult male rhesus monkeys were trained on tasks which assess reversal learning, extradimensional attentional shift learning and spatial delayed-response. Subjects were challenged with 0.1-0.5mg/kg Δ(9)THC, i.m., in randomized order and evaluated on the behavioral measures. Peak plasma levels of Δ(9)THC were observed 30min after 0.2mg/kg (69±29ng/ml) and 60min after 0.5mg/kg (121±23ng/ml) was administered and behavioral effects on a bimanual motor task persisted for up to 2h after injection. An increase in errors-to-criterion (ETC) associated with reversal learning was further increased by Δ(9)THC in a dose-dependent manner. The increase in ETC associated with extradimensional shifts was not affected by Δ(9)THC. Spatial delayed-response performance was impaired by Δ(9)THC in a retention-interval-dependent manner. Overall the pattern of results suggests a more profound effect of Δ(9)THC on tasks mediated by orbitofrontal (reversal learning) versus dorsolateral (extradimensional shifts) prefrontal mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Wright
- Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schuster RM, Gonzalez R. Substance Abuse, Hepatitis C, and Aging in HIV: Common Cofactors that Contribute to Neurobehavioral Disturbances. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 2012:15-34. [PMID: 24014165 DOI: 10.2147/nbhiv.s17408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Although the prevalence of neurocognitive disturbances among individuals with HIV has decreased in recent years, rates of impairment still remain high. This review presents findings from comorbid conditions that may contribute to further neurocognitive impairments in this already vulnerable population. We will focus on three co-factors that have received substantial attention in the neuroAIDS literature: drug use, hepatitis C co-infection (HCV), and aging. All three conditions commonly co-occur with HIV and likely interact with HIV in complex ways. Collectively, the extant literature suggests that drug use, HCV, and aging serve to worsen the neurocognitive profile of HIV through several overlapping mechanisms. A better understanding of how specific comorbidities interact with HIV may reveal specific phenotypes of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder that may aid in the development of more targeted behavioral and pharmacological treatment efforts.
Collapse
|