Exploring the Role of Regional Anesthesia in the Treatment of the Burn-injured Patient: A Narrative Review of Current Literature

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for burn management: a retrospective study of outcomes and complications in 281 burn patients

BACKGROUND

There is scarce literature regarding the use of continuous peripheral nerve blocks in acute burn patients, who may be at higher risk for catheter-related complications, including infection. We sought to describe our center's experience and infection rate with continuous perineural catheters in the setting of pain management for patients suffering from burns.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed including all patients admitted to an American Burn Association-verified regional burn center between January 2018 and July 2023 who received a continuous peripheral nerve block for an acute burn injury.

RESULTS

There were 281 patients in the study cohort who received 484 perineural catheters. The cohort was 52% men with a median age of 39 years (IQR 30-55). A catheter-associated infection, defined as a clinical diagnosis by the treating physicians requiring the need for treatment with antibiotics or surgical debridement, was identified in six perineural catheters (1.2%, 95% CI 0% to 2.2%) involving six different patients (2.1%, 95% CI 0% to 3.8%). The median total body surface area burned was 5% (IQR 2-9%) and 20% of patients had full-thickness burns. The most commonly used catheters were infraclavicular (49%), popliteal sciatic (29%), femoral (19%), and adductor canal (17%). One-third (33%) of patients did not require operating room debridement as the block provided sufficient analgesia for bedside debridement. The median duration of catheter use was 6 days (IQR 4-8). There were no documented cases of nerve injury or toxicity, vascular injury, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

In our practice, continuous perineural catheters in the setting of acute burns are associated with an infection rate comparable to other surgical populations.

Medical and Surgical Care of Critical Burn Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence and Practice

Critically ill burn patients pose several unique challenges to care providers. The concepts of fluid resuscitation, nutritional management, organ support and wound care are rapidly evolving. There is a pressing need to review emerging evidence and incorporate these into practice for the effective management of burn patients. We have searched the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to review the current evidence on the acute care management of adult as well as paediatric burn patients. The rationales for current practices have been integrated into the review. The management of critically ill burn patients requires an in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology of burn injury, a tailored approach for timely resuscitation, timely diagnosis of organ specific problems, and comprehensive wound care. This review will help the doctors and healthcare providers involved in the management of critical burn patients in their day-to-day practice.

Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block for the Management of Graft Site Pain During Dressing Change in the Burn-Injured Patient: A Randomized Control Trial

Burn injuries requiring split-thickness skin grafting procedures often require ongoing wound aggravation in the form of dressing changes. These dressing changes may cause significant pain due to stimulation of damaged nerve endings in the epidermal layer. A randomized control trial, pilot study, was undertaken to evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided regional nerve block on the outcome of patient reported pain scores by inpatients requiring dressing changes for hand and upper limb burn injuries. Twenty participants aged >18 years, requiring split-skin grafting for burn injuries of <15% total body surface area were enrolled from a tertiary burns unit between August 2018 and September 2020. Participants were randomized to control (10 participants) or intervention group (10 participants). All participants received analgesia as per their treating team, the intervention group received the addition of an ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block prior to their dressing change procedure. The primary outcome was to assess perceived pain at the graft site as measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10) before, during, and after dressing change procedure. There was strong evidence of a difference in the adjusted mean change score between groups, with a mean reduction of 4.3 in the intervention group, indicating reduced pain, and a mean increase of 1.2 in the control group (P < .001). No adverse events occurred in either group, and the addition of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (RA) for the treatment of dressing pain was determined to be a safe and effective intervention.

Regional Anesthesia Use in Pediatric Burn Surgery: A Descriptive Retrospective Series

Pediatric burns are a common and often devastating injury. Treatment, reconstruction, and rehabilitation are painful experiences. For some, the experience triggers post-traumatic stress disorder and/or a chronic pain syndrome. Given the role pain plays as a major secondary disease, it must be addressed to achieve optimal healing. Regional anesthesia has been used extensively to manage postoperative pain and reduce the need for opioids following other surgical procedures in children. However, regional anesthesia is not widely used in pediatric burn care. We present a descriptive, retrospective case series of 15 pediatric burn patients who received regional anesthesia as part of their intra-operative pain management. In our patient population, we saw low levels of anesthetic as well as opioid usage with well-controlled pain. In this cohort, 93% of patients scored a 0/10 on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale for pain by post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge, with an average PACU stay of 70 minutes. Thirty-three percent of patients received no opioids, with the average opioid dose being 0.06mg/kg morphine equivalents. This case series serves to make clinicians aware of the feasibility of use and benefits of regional anesthesia in pediatric burn patients requiring operative repair.

Techniques and strategies for regional anesthesia in acute burn care-a narrative review

Burn injuries and their treatments result in severe pain. Unlike traumatic injuries that are characterized by a discrete episode of pain followed by recovery, burn-injured patients endure pain for a prolonged period that lasts through wound closure (e.g. background pain, procedural pain, breakthrough pain, neuropathic pain and itch). Regional anesthesia, including peripheral nerve blocks and neuraxial/epidural anesthesia, offers significant benefits to a multimodal approach in pain treatment. A 'regional-first' approach to pain management can be incorporated into the workflow of burn centers through engaging regional anesthesiologists and pain medicine practitioners in the care of burn patients. A detailed understanding of peripheral nerve anatomy frames the burn clinician's perspective when considering a peripheral nerve block/catheter. The infra/supraclavicular nerve block provides excellent coverage for the upper extremity, while the trunk can be covered with a variety of blocks including erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum plane blocks. The lower extremity is targeted with fascia iliaca plane and sciatic nerve blocks for both donor and recipient sites. Burn centers that adopt regional anesthesia should be aware of potential complications and contraindications to prevent adverse events, including management of local anesthetic toxicity and epidural infections. Management of anticoagulation around regional anesthesia placement is crucial to prevent hematoma and nerve damage. Ultimately, regional anesthesia can facilitate a better patient experience and allow for early therapy and mobility goals that are hallmarks of burn care and rehabilitation.

Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Plane Block for the treatment of donor site pain in the burn injured patient: a randomized control trial

Burn injuries requiring surgical intervention often result in split- thickness skin grafting procedures, with donor skin frequently harvested from the patient's anterolateral thigh. The donor site is often reported as the primary site of post-operative pain due to the damage sustained to localised nociceptors.A randomised control trial was undertaken to evaluate the impact an ultrasound-guided regional nerve block would have on patient reported pain scores in donor site wounds, and associated rescue analgesia consumption. Twenty participants requiring split-skin grafting for burn injuries of <15% total body surface area were enrolled from a tertiary burns unit and randomised to control (10 participants) or intervention group (10 participants). The intervention group received the addition of an ultrasound-guided facia iliaca plane block prior to their surgery. Primary outcome was pain score in the donor site during the postoperative phase; while secondary outcome was pain on day 1 post-surgery as measured by the numeric pain score (0-10). During the post-operative phase, the intervention group had a significantly lower median donor site pain score of 0 (interquartile range (IQR) 0 - 0), compared to the control group median 6 (IQR 4 - 7) (p < 0.001). Day 1 post-surgery the intervention group had a median pain score of 0 (IQR 0 - 4) compared to control group median 4.5 (IQR 2 - 6) (p= 0.043).The study findings demonstrated that regional anaesthesia was an effective way to reduce pain scores and requirement for additional analgesics during the postoperative phase.

The Pediatric Burn: Current Trends and Future Directions

Management of the pediatric burn patient presents a variety of clinical challenges for the pediatric anesthesiologist. Despite the high incidence of burn injuries, standard management strategies are far from universal. The complex physiologic changes presented by burn injuries present airway management and resuscitation challenges and mandate careful consideration of adequate nutritional support. Long hospital stays with frequent operations and dressing changes necessitate creative approaches to anxiolysis and pain control. Underutilized modalities warranting further research include regional anesthesia and nonpharmacologic approaches, such as virtual reality. Further research and collaboration between burn centers are needed to standardize care for this population.

Management of severe thermal burns in the acute phase in adults and children

OBJECTIVES

To provide recommendations to facilitate the management of severe thermal burns during the acute phase in adults and children.

DESIGN

A committee of 20 experts was asked to produce recommendations in six fields of burn management, namely, (1) assessment, admission to specialised burns centres, and telemedicine; (2) haemodynamic management; (3) airway management and smoke inhalation; (4) anaesthesia and analgesia; (5) burn wound treatments; and (6) other treatments. At the start of the recommendation-formulation process, a formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed and enforced throughout the process. The entire process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The experts drew up a list of questions that were formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes). Two bibliography experts per field analysed the literature published from January 2000 onwards using predefined keywords according to PRISMA recommendations. The quality of data from the selected literature was assessed using GRADE® methodology. Due to the current paucity of sufficiently powered studies regarding hard outcomes (i.e. mortality), the recommendations are based on expert opinion.

RESULTS

The SFAR guidelines panel generated 24 statements regarding the management of acute burn injuries in adults and children. After two scoring rounds and one amendment, strong agreement was reached for all recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Substantial agreement was reached among a large cohort of experts regarding numerous strong recommendations to optimise the management of acute burn injuries in adults and children.