Two-center analysis of cannabis on venous thromboembolism risk after traumatic injury: A matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Conflicting evidence exists evaluating associations between cannabis (THC) and post-traumatic DVT.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis (2014-2023) of patients ≥15yrs from two Level I trauma centers with robust VTE surveillance and prophylaxis protocols. Multivariable hierarchical regression assessed the association between THC and DVT risk. THC ​+ ​patients were direct matched to other drug use categories on VTE risk markers and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 7365 patients, 3719 were drug-, 575 were THC ​+ ​only, 2583 were other drug+, and 488 were TCH+/other drug+. DVT rates by exposure group did not differ. TCH ​+ ​only patients had higher GCS scores, shorter hospital length of stay, and the lowest pelvic fracture and mortality rates. A total of 458 drug-, 453 other drug+, and 232 THC+/other drug ​+ ​patients were matched to 458, 453, and 232 THC ​+ ​only patients. There were no differences in DVT event rates in any paired sub-cohort set. Additionally, iteratively adjusted paired models did not show an association between THC and DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

THC does not appear to be associated with increased DVT risk in patients with strict trauma chemoprophylaxis. Toxicology testing is useful for identifying substance abuse intervention opportunities, but not for DVT risk stratification in THC ​+ ​patients.

Contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries: Validation of the 2020 AAST Colon Organ Injury Scale

INTRODUCTION

The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Colon Organ Injury Scale (OIS) was updated in 2020 to include a separate OIS for penetrating colon injuries and included imaging criteria. In this multicenter study, we describe the contemporary management and outcomes of penetrating colon injuries and hypothesize that the 2020 OIS system correlates with operative management, complications, and outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients presenting to 12 Level 1 trauma centers between 2016 and 2020 with penetrating colon injuries and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of <3 in other body regions. We assessed the association of the new OIS with surgical management and clinical outcomes and the association of OIS imaging criteria with operative criteria. Bivariate analysis was done with χ 2 , analysis of variance, and Kruskal-Wallis, where appropriate. Multivariable models were constructed in a stepwise selection fashion.

RESULTS

We identified 573 patients with penetrating colon injuries. Patients were young and predominantly male; 79% suffered a gunshot injury, 11% had a grade V destructive injury, 19% required ≥6 U of transfusion, 24% had an Injury Severity Score of >15, and 42% had moderate-to-large contamination. Higher OIS was independently associated with a lower likelihood of primary repair, higher likelihood of resection with anastomosis and/or diversion, need for damage-control laparotomy, and higher incidence of abscess, wound infection, extra-abdominal infections, acute kidney injury, and lung injury. Damage control was independently associated with diversion and intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal infections. Preoperative imaging in 152 (27%) cases had a low correlation with operative findings ( κ coefficient, 0.13).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study to date of penetrating colon injuries and the first multicenter validation of the new OIS specific to these injuries. While imaging criteria alone lacked strong predictive value, operative American Association for the Surgery of Trauma OIS colon grade strongly predicted type of interventions and outcomes, supporting use of this grading scale for research and clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Falling from new heights: Traumatic fracture burden and resource utilization after border wall height increase

BACKGROUND

San Diego County hospitals commonly care for patients injured by falls from the United States-Mexico border. From 2018 to 2019, the height of >400 miles of an existing border wall was raised. Prior work has demonstrated a 5-fold increase in traumatic border wall fall injuries after barrier expansion. We aimed to examine the impact of a barrier height increase on fracture burden and resource use.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center from 2016 to 2021 with lower extremity or pelvic fractures sustained from a border wall fall. We defined the pre-wall group as patients admitted from 2016 to 2018 and the post-wall group as those admitted from 2019 to 2021. We collected demographic and treatment data, hospital charges, weight-bearing status at discharge, and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients (pre-wall: 45; post-wall: 275) were admitted with 951 lower extremity fractures (pre-wall: 101; post-wall: 850) due to border wall fall. Hospital resources were utilized to a greater extent post-wall: a 537% increase in hospital days, a 776% increase in intensive care unit days, and a 468% increase in operative procedures. Overall, 86% of patients were non-weight-bearing on at least 1 lower extremity at discharge; 82% were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic lower extremity fractures sustained from border wall fall rapidly rose after the wall height increase. Hospital resources were used to a greater extent. Patients were frequently discharged with weight-bearing limitations and rarely received scheduled follow-up care. Policymakers should consider the costs of caring for border fall patients, and access to follow-up should be expanded.

Up and over: Consequences of raising the United States-Mexico border wall height

OBJECTIVES

San Diego County's geographic location lends a unique demographic of migrant patients injured by falls at the United States-Mexico border. To prevent migrant crossings, a 2017 Executive Order allocated funds to increase the southern California border wall height from 10 ft to 30 ft, which was completed in December 2019. We hypothesized that the elevated border wall height is associated with increased major trauma, resource utilization, and health care costs.

METHODS

Retrospective trauma registry review of border wall falls was performed by the two Level I trauma centers that admit border fall patients from the southern California border from January 2016 to June 2022. Patients were assigned to either "pre-2020" or "post-2020" subgroups based upon timing of completion of the heightened border wall. Total number of admissions, operating room utilization, hospital charges, and hospital costs were compared.

RESULTS

Injuries from border wall falls grew 967% from 2016 to 2021 (39 vs. 377 admissions); this percentage is expected to be supplanted in 2022. When comparing the two subgroups, operating room utilization (175 vs. 734 total operations) and median hospital charges per patient ($95,229 vs. $168,795) have risen dramatically over the same time period. Hospital costs increased 636% in the post-2020 subgroup ($11,351,216 versus $72,172,123). The majority (97%) of these patients are uninsured at admission, with costs largely subsidized by federal government entities (57%) or through state Medicaid enrollment postadmission (31%).

CONCLUSION

The increased height of the United States-Mexico border wall has resulted in record numbers of injured migrant patients, placing novel financial and resource burdens on already stressed trauma systems. To address this public health crisis, legislators and health care providers must conduct collaborative, apolitical discussions regarding the border wall's efficacy as a means of deterrence and its impact on traumatic injury and disability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Cross-Border Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Burn Patients

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem worldwide, with differences in regional resistance patterns partially driven by local variance in antibiotic stewardship. Trauma patients transferring from Mexico have more AMR than those injured in the United States; we hypothesized a similar pattern would be present for burn patients. Patients and Methods: The registry of an American Burn Association (ABA)-verified burn center was queried for all admissions for burn injury January 2015 through December 2019 with hospital length-of-stay (LOS) longer than seven days. Patients were divided into two groups based upon burn location: United States (USA) or Mexico (MEX). All bacterial infections were analyzed. Results: A total of 73 MEX and 826 USA patients were included. Patients had a similar mean age (40.4 years MEX vs. 42.2 USA) and gender distribution (69.6% male vs. 64.4%). The MEX patients had larger median percent total body surface area burned (%TBSA; 11.1% vs. 4.3%; p ≤ 0.001) and longer hospital LOS (18.0 vs. 13.0 days; p = 0.028). The MEX patients more often had respiratory infections (16.4% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.046), whereas rates of other infections were similar. The MEX patients had higher rates of any resistant organism (47.2% of organisms MEX vs. 28.1% USA; p = 0.013), and were more likely to have resistant infections on univariable analysis; however, on multivariable analysis country of burn was no longer significant. Conclusions: Antimicrobial resistance is more common in burn patients initially burned in Mexico than those burned in the United States, but location was not a predictor of resistance compared to other traditional burn-related factors. Continuing to monitor for AMR regardless of country of burn remains critical.