Preliminary Intraoperative Validation of the Nociception Level Index

Qnox index for quantification of intraoperative nociception and analgesia: a prospective single-centre validation study

BACKGROUND

The Qnox index is a novel monitor to quantify intraoperative nociception based on an electroencephalographic algorithm. We evaluated the ability of the Qnox index to discriminate noxious from non-noxious stimuli, respond to stimuli, and discriminate different levels of analgesia in patients under propofol anaesthesia with neuromuscular block.

METHODS

Qnox was compared with heart rate and mean arterial pressure with five designated stimuli: tetanic stimulations without (tetanic 1) and with sufentanil (tetanic 2), skin incision, tracheal intubation, and a non-noxious period. The response around the skin incision was also evaluated at two target remifentanil concentrations.

RESULTS

In 83 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery, Qnox performed worse than heart rate and mean arterial pressure in discriminating tetanic 2, tetanic 1, skin incision, and tracheal intubation noxious stimuli from the non-noxious period, with an area under curve of 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.43-0.61), 0.54 (0.45-0.62), 0.67 (0.58-0.75), and 0.65 (0.57-0.73), respectively. The post-stimulus values of Qnox increased significantly after tracheal intubation and skin incision, but not after tetanic 1 or tetanic 2. Qnox values after skin incision were similar between the low- and high-remifentanil-concentration groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Qnox had a poor ability to discriminate noxious stimuli from non-noxious stimuli. Although Qnox responded to tracheal intubation and skin incision, it did not respond to tetanic stimulations and failed to discriminate different levels of analgesia. The Qnox index was not superior to heart rate or mean arterial pressure in assessing nociception during general anaesthesia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100046063).

Validation of the Nociception Level Index for the Detection of Nociception and Pain in Critically Ill Adults: Protocol for an Observational Study

BACKGROUND

In the intensive care unit (ICU), many patients are unable to communicate their pain through self-reporting or behaviors due to their critical care condition, mechanical ventilation, and medication (eg, heavily sedated or chemically paralyzed). Therefore, alternative pain assessment methods are urgently needed for this vulnerable patient population. The Nociception Level (NOL) index is a multiparameter technology initially developed for the monitoring of nociception and related pain in anesthetized patients, and its use in the ICU is new.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to validate the NOL for the assessment of nociception and related pain in critically ill adults in the ICU. Specific objectives are to examine the ability of the NOL to: (1) detect pain using standard criteria (ie, self-report and behavioral measures), (2) discriminate between nociceptive and nonnociceptive procedures, and (3) generate consistent values when patients are at rest.

METHODS

The NOL will be monitored in three ICU patient groups: (1) Group A, participants able to self-report their pain (the reference standard criterion using the 0-10 Faces Pain Thermometer) and express behaviors; (2) Group B, participants unable to self-report but able to express behaviors (the alternative standard criterion using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool); and (3) Group C, participants unable to self-report and express behaviors. The NOL will be tested before, during, and after two types of standard care procedures: (1) nonnociceptive (eg, cuff inflation to measure blood pressure, soft touch) and (2) nociceptive (eg, tube or drain removal, endotracheal or tracheal suctioning). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the NOL will be performed for Groups A and B using pain standard measures as reference criteria. Mixed linear models for repeated measures will be used to compare time points, procedures, and their interaction in each group (A, B, and C). Based on power analyses and considering an attrition rate of 25%, a total sample size of 146 patients (68 in Group A, 62 in Group B, and 16 in Group C) is targeted.

RESULTS

This study was funded in April 2020 but could not be launched until 2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruitment and data collection began at the primary site in July 2022 and has been implemented at the secondary sites in 2023 and 2024 and is planned to continue until 2026.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary strength of this study protocol is that it is based on rigorous validation strategies with the use of pain standard criteria (ie, self-report and behavioral measures). If found to be valid, the NOL could be used as an alternative physiologic measure of pain in critically ill adults for whom no other pain assessment methods are available.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05339737; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05339737.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/60672.

Photoplethysmography parameters in monitoring nociception during general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Validated monitoring methods for evaluating the balance of nociception and anti-nociception (BNAN) are needed in general anesthesia. This study assessed six photoplethysmography (PPG) parameters, computed from finger photoplethysmographic waveforms in patients undergoing gynecological surgery under general anesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 20 participants were included, each undergoing general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. The same concentration of remifentanil was maintained throughout the experiment, four different intensities of electrical stimulation were administered, and the patient's fingertip PPG was meticulously recorded. PPG data were preprocessed to extract six PPG morphological parameters, and photoplethysmographic amplitude (PPGA), pulse beat interval (PBI), and surgical pleth index (SPI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) were constructed and calculated to accurately measure its ability to reflect the nociceptive stimulus state. The consistency of different phase parameters at different stimulus intensities was evaluated by calculating the prediction probabilities. All results were compared with those obtained using SPI, PPGA, and PBI.

RESULTS

After stimulation, all parameters and SPI showed significant changes compared with those before stimulation (p = 0.000). The catacrotic phase parameters (AC and MHC) showed higher discrimination in adequate analgesia and congruence with electrical stimulation intensity than the overall phase parameters, PPGA, and anacrotic phase parameters (AC: AUC = 0.851, Pk = 0.800; MHC: AUC = 0.837, Pk = 0.792).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, six PPG morphological parameters were proposed and observed for the first time to effectively distinguish the occurrence of nociception. Compared with the overall phase parameters, PPGA, and anacrotic phase parameters, catacrotic phase parameters were more capable of characterizing noxious stimuli and more consistent with changes in electrical stimulation intensity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200062228; Registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov on July 30, 2022.

Influence of Intraoperative Pain Management on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative analgesia and sedation are closely related to postoperative delirium. Depth of sedation based on bispectral index (BIS) guidance has been shown to reduce the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD). However, the correlation between intraoperative analgesia levels and POD is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intraoperative analgesic management guided by the nociceptive stimulus index (NOX) on postoperative delirium.

METHODS

In this prospective single-center randomized controlled study, elderly patients aged 65 and above, who are scheduled to undergo unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), were allocated into two groups: the routine monitoring group (group R), which solely monitored patient sedation levels using BIS; and the NOX monitoring group (group N), which monitored patient analgesic levels using NOX based on BIS-monitored sedation levels. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium within 3 days after surgery, using the confusion assessment method (CAM).

RESULTS

From May 2022 to December 2022, a total of 240 patients were randomized; 12 were excluded because of failure to meet experimental conditions or were lost to follow-up. Patients in group N had a lower incidence rate (%) of POD on the first day compared to those in group R (8 (7%) vs 18 (16%), P = 0.041). The dosage of remifentanil administered in group N was significantly higher than that in group R (927.07 ± 268.09 vs 882.32 ± 187.91 mg, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate intraoperative analgesia guided by NOX is associated with POD. When sedation levels were consistent, the incidence of POD was significantly reduced in older patients with NOX-guided analgesic management during unilateral TKA surgery.

Nociception level index-directed superficial parasternal intercostal plane block vs erector spinae plane block in open-heart surgery: a propensity matched non-inferiority clinical trial

This single-center study explored the efficacy of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in opioid-sparing within Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthesia for elective open-heart surgery. After targeted propensity matching, 19 adult patients given general anesthesia with preincisional SPIPB were compared to 33 with preincisional ESPB. We hypothesized that SPIPB is non-inferior to ESPB in reducing total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, with a non-inferiority margin (δ) set at 0.1 mg. Intraoperative fentanyl dosing targeted a NOL index ≤ 25. Postoperatively, paracetamol 1 g 6-hourly and morphine for numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 were administered. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for total intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as the confidence interval for the median difference of 0.1 mg (95% CI 0.05-0.15) crossed the predefined δ, with the lower bound falling below and the upper bound exceeding δ, p = 0.558. SPIPB led to higher postoperative morphine use at 24 and 48 h: 0 (0-40.6) vs. 59.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p < 0.001 and 22.2 (0-42.6) vs. 63.5 (28.5-96.1) µg kg-1, p = 0.001. Four times fewer SPIPB patients remained morphine-free at 48 h, p < 0.001, and their time to first morphine dose was three times shorter compared to ESPB patients, p = 0.001. SPIPB led to higher time-weighted average NRS scores at rest, 1 (0-1) vs. 1 (1-2), p = 0.004, and with movement, 2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3), p = 0.002, calculated over the 48-h period post-extubation. The SPIPB group had a significantly higher average NOL index, p = 0.003, and greater NOL index variability, p = 0.027. This study could not demonstrate that SPIPB was inferior to ESPB for intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes, with SPIPB leading to higher postoperative morphine use, higher pain scores, and reduced nociception control.

Reliability of nociceptive monitors vs. standard practice during general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Inadequate or excessive nociceptive control during general anesthesia can result in significant adverse outcomes. Using traditional clinical variables, such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate, to assess and manage nociceptive responses is often insufficient and could lead to overtreatment with both anesthetics and opioids. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of three nociception monitoring techniques Nociception Level Index (NOL), Skin Conductance Algesimeter (SCA) and heart rate monitoring in patients undergoing image-guided, minimally invasive abdominal interventions under general anesthesia.

METHOD

This prospective observational study collected data from 2022 to 2024. All patients were anesthetized according to the department's routine, and predetermined events were recorded. Two commercially available nociception monitors, the PMD-200 from Medasense (NOL) and PainSensor from MedStorm (SCA), were used, and their data were collected along with various hemodynamic parameters. The three nociception monitoring techniques were compared during predetermined events.

RESULT

A total of 49 patients were included in this study. NOL and SCA demonstrated higher responsiveness than HR for all events except for skin incision. The comparison of the values above and below the threshold for each nociceptive stimulus showed significance for all measurements using the SCA and NOL. However, using HR as a surrogate for nociception with a threshold of a 10% increase from baseline, the difference was significant only at skin incision. There was no variation in the peak values attributable to differences in patients' age. Weight was a significant predictor of the peak NOL values.

CONCLUSION

NOL and SCA demonstrated superior sensitivity and responsiveness to nociceptive stimuli compared to HR, effectively detecting significant changes in nociceptive thresholds across various stimuli, although responses during skin incision showed no such advantage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial - NCT05218551.

Machine learning based quantitative pain assessment for the perioperative period

This study developed and evaluated a model for assessing pain during the surgical period using photoplethysmogram data from 242 patients. Pain levels were measured at 2 min intervals using a numerical rating scale or clinical criteria: preoperative, before and after intubation, before and after skin incision, and postoperative. Key features from the photoplethysmography waveform were extracted to build XGBoost-based models for intraoperative and postoperative pain assessment. The combined perioperative model was compared with a commercial surgical pain index, yielding area under the receiver operating characteristics curve scores of 0.819 and 0.927 for intraoperative and postoperative periods, respectively, compared to the commercial index's scores of 0.829 and 0.577. These results highlight the models' effectiveness in pain assessment throughout the surgical process, identifying waveform skewness and diastolic phase rate decrease as critical for intraoperative pain assessment and systolic phase area or baseline fluctuation as significant for postoperative pain assessment.Clinical trial registration: Registration name: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS). Registration site: http://cris.nih.go.kr . Number: KCT0005840. Principal Investigator: Dr. Byung-Moon Choi. Date of registration: January 28, 2021.

Assessment of the antinociceptive effect of a single fentanyl bolus dose in children: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis based on the nociception level index during sevoflurane general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The Nociception Level Index has shown benefits in estimating the nociception/antinociception balance in adults, but there is limited evidence in the pediatric population. Evaluating the index performance in children might provide valuable insights to guide opioid administration.

AIMS

To evaluate the Nociception Level Index ability to identify a standardized nociceptive stimulus and the analgesic effect of a fentanyl bolus. Additionally, to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of fentanyl with the Nociception Level Index response during sevoflurane anesthesia.

METHODS

Nineteen children, 5.3 (4.1-6.7) years, scheduled for lower abdominal or urological surgery, were studied. After sevoflurane anesthesia and caudal block, a tetanic stimulus (50 Hz, 60 mA, 5 s) was performed in the forearm. Following the administration of fentanyl 2 μg/kg intravenous bolus, three similar consecutive tetanic stimuli were performed at 5-, 15-, and 30-min post-fentanyl administration. Changes in the Nociception Level Index, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and bispectral index were compared in response to the tetanic stimuli. Fentanyl plasma concentrations and the Nociception Level Index data were used to elaborate a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model using a sequential modeling approach in NONMEM®.

RESULTS

After the first tetanic stimulus, both the Nociception Level Index and the heart rate increased compared to baseline (8 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 10; mean difference (CI95) -12(-18--6) and 100 ± 10 vs. 102 ± 10; -2(-4--0.1)) and decrease following fentanyl administration (19 ± 10 vs. 8 ± 8; 12 (5-18) and 102 ± 10 vs. 91 ± 11; 11 (7-16)). In subsequent tetanic stimuli, heart rate remained unchanged, while the Nociception Level Index progressively increased within 15 min to values similar to those before fentanyl. An allometric weight-scaled, 3-compartment model best characterized the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling analysis revealed hysteresis between fentanyl plasma concentrations and the Nociception Level Index response, characterized by plasma effect-site equilibration half-time of 1.69 (0.4-2.9) min. The estimated fentanyl C50 was 1.93 (0.73-4.2) ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

The Nociception Level Index showed superior capability compared to traditional hemodynamic variables in discriminating different nociception-antinociception levels during varying fentanyl concentrations in children under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Influence of Nociception Level Monitor (NOL)-Guided Analgesic Delivery on Perioperative Course in Breast Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and Objectives: Breast cancer surgeries offer challenges in perioperative pain management, especially in the presence of inherent risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). Inappropriate opioid consumption was speculated as one of the reasons. Through this study, the influence of objective pain monitoring through a nociception level monitor (NOL) on perioperative course in breast surgeries was investigated. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized study conducted at a regional hospital. Sixty female patients posted for breast cancer surgery were randomized equally into study and control groups. Both groups were monitored using BIS and NOL, but in the control group, the NOL monitor was blinded by a cover. Both groups received propofol and remifentanil through target-controlled infusions (TCIs) along with interpectoral, pectoserratus (PECS II), and superficial pectointercostal block. The primary outcome was intraoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were PONV, eligibility for discharge from the recovery room, and symptoms of PMPS after three months. Results: Two patients were excluded. The study group received significantly less remifentanil (0.9 mg in the study group vs. 1.35 mg in the control group, p = 0.033) and morphine (2.5 mg in study group vs. 5 mg in control group, p = 0.013). There was no difference in PMPS symptoms between the groups. The study group showed longer duration of inadequate analgesia (i.e., 7% vs. 10% of the total intraoperative period in control and study group, respectively, p = 0.008). There was no difference in time to eligibility for discharge from the recovery room between the groups. Conclusions: NOL monitor-guided analgesic delivery reduces intraoperative opioid consumption. No difference was demonstrated on PONV, eligibility for discharge from the recovery room, or PMPS symptoms.

Does Nociception Level Index-Guided Opioid Administration Reduce Intraoperative Opioid Consumption? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The nociception level (NOL) index is a quantitative parameter derived from physiological signals to measure intraoperative nociception. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate if NOL monitoring reduces intraoperative opioid use compared to conventional therapy (opioid administered at clinician discretion).

METHODS

This meta-analysis comprises randomized clinical trials comparing NOL-guided opioid administration to conventional therapy in adult patients undergoing any type of surgery. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases was conducted. The primary outcome was intraoperative opioid consumption and the effect estimate of the NOL index was measured using the standardized mean difference (SMD) where 0.20 is considered a small and 0.80 a large effect size. A random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied to estimate the treatment effect. Heterogeneity was explored clinically and statistically (using the inconsistency I ² statistic, prediction intervals, and influence analysis). The quality (certainty) of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines methodology.

RESULTS

This review comprised 9 trials (519 patients). The intraoperative opioid SMD (NOL monitoring versus conventional therapy) was -0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.82 to 0.30; P = .31; low certainty of evidence). We observed substantial clinical (intraoperative opioid regimens) and statistical heterogeneity with the I ² statistic being 86% (95% CI, 75%-92%). The prediction interval was between -1.95 and 1.42 indicating where the SMD between NOL and conventional therapy would lie if a similar study were conducted in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis does not provide evidence supporting the role of NOL monitoring in reducing intraoperative opioid consumption.

Using the nociception level index to compare the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of propofol and sevoflurane during clinical and experimental noxious stimulus in patients under general anesthesia

STUDY

Propofol and sevoflurane are two anesthetic agents widely used to induce and maintain general anesthesia (GA). Their intrinsic antinociceptive properties remain unclear and are still debated.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether propofol presents stronger antinociceptive properties than sevoflurane using intraoperative clinical and experimental noxious stimulations and evaluating postoperative pain outcomes.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized monocentric trial.

SETTING

Perioperative care.

PATIENTS

60 adult patients with ASA status I to III who underwent elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery under GA were randomized either in propofol or sevoflurane group to induce and maintain GA.

INTERVENTIONS

We used clinical and experimental noxious stimulations (intubation, tetanic stimulation) to assess the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane in patients under GA and monitored using the NOL index, BIS index, heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure.

MEASUREMENTS

We measured the difference in the NOL index alterations after intubation and tetanic stimulation during either intravenous anesthesia (propofol) or inhaled anesthesia (sevoflurane). We also intraoperatively measured the NOL index and remifentanil consumption and recorded postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit. Intraoperative management was standardized by targeting similar values of depth of anesthesia (BIS index), hemodynamic (HR and MAP), NOL index values (below the threshold of 20), same multimodal analgesia and type of surgery.

MAIN RESULTS

We found the antinociceptive properties of propofol and sevoflurane similar. The only minor difference was after tetanic stimulation: the delta NOL was higher in the sevoflurane group (39 ± 13 for the propofol group versus 47 ± 15 for sevoflurane; P = 0.04). Intraoperative and postoperative pain outcomes and opioid consumption were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a precise intraoperative experimental and clinical protocol using the NOL index, propofol does not provide a higher level of antinociception during anesthesia or analgesia after surgery when compared to sevoflurane. Anesthesiologists may prefer propofol over sevoflurane to reduce PONV or anesthesia-related pollution, but not for superior antinociceptive properties.

Analysis of the Effects of Epidural Anesthesia on the Nociception Level Index (NOL®) during Abdominal Surgery

Background: The NOL® system (PMD-200™ Nociception Level Monitor; Medasense Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel) is used for the real-time detection of physiological nociception in anesthetized patients by assessing the parameters indicative of sympathetic activity, such as photoplethysmography, skin conductance, peripheral temperature, and accelerometry, which are quantified into the NOL®-Index. This index is more sensitive than traditional clinical parameters in estimating pain and stress responses. While its effectiveness in general anesthesia is well documented, its efficacy in epidural anesthesia needs further investigation. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed NOL®-Index dynamics compared to conventional parameters after epidural administration of bupivacaine. Following ethics committee approval, 119 NOL® measurements were retrospectively analyzed after thoracic epidural catheter administration in 40 patients undergoing abdominal and urological surgery. The NOL-Index® was assessed at 0, 1, 3, and 5 min post application and compared to heart rate, blood pressure, and bispectral index dynamics. Results: This study showed a significant decrease in the NOL®-Index post-local-anesthetic administration with better sensitivity than classical clinical parameters (0 min = 38 ± 11; 1 min = 22 ± 13*; 3 min = 17 ± 11*; 5 min = 12 ± 10*). Higher doses of local anesthetics led to a significant, dose-dependent decrease in NOL®-Index (low dose, 5 min = 15 ± 10*; high dose, 5 min = 8 ± 8*). Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of the NOL®-Index in measuring nociceptive effects following epidural administration, highlighting its potential superiority over conventional parameters and its sensitivity to dose variations.

Nociception level index variations in ICU: curarized vs non-curarized patients - a pilot study

PURPOSE

Pain is a major physiological stressor that can worsen critical medical conditions in many ways. Currently, there is no reliable monitoring tool which is available for pain monitoring in the deeply sedated ± curarized critically ill patients. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the multiparameter nociception index (NOL®) in the critical care setting. We compared NOL with traditionally used neurovegetative signs and examined its correlation with sedation depth measured by bispectral index (BIS®) electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted in a general intensive care unit, including patients who required moderate-to-deep levels of sedation with or without continuous neuromuscular blockade. The performance of NOL was evaluated both in the entire studied population, as well as in two subgroups: curarized and non-curarized patients.

RESULTS

NOL demonstrated greater accuracy than all other indicators in pain detection in the overall population. In the non-curare subgroup, all indices correctly recognized painful stimulation, while in the patients subjected to neuromuscular blocking agent's infusion, only NOL properly identified nociception. In the former group, EEG's relation to nociception was on the border of statistical significance, whereas in the latter BIS showed no correlation with NOL.

CONCLUSION

NOL emerges as a promising device for pain assessment in the critical care setting and exhibits its best performance precisely in the clinical context where reliable pain assessment methods are most lacking. Furthermore, our research confirms the distinction between sedation and analgesia, highlighting the necessity for distinct monitoring instruments to accurately assess them.

Progress in the validation of nociception monitoring in guiding intraoperative analgesic therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes the current level of validation for several nociception monitors using a categorized validation process to facilitate the comparison of performance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nociception monitors improve the detection of a shift in the nociception and antinociception balance during anesthesia, guiding perioperative analgesic therapy. A clear overview and comparison of the validation process for these monitors is missing.

RESULTS

Within a 2-year time-frame, we identified validation studies for four monitors [analgesia nociception index (ANI), nociception level monitor (NOL), surgical pleth index (SPI), and pupillometry]. We categorized these studies in one out of six mandatory validation steps: developmental studies, clinical validation studies, pharmacological validation studies, clinical utility studies, outcome improvement studies and economical evaluation studies. The current level of validation for most monitors is mainly focused on the first three categories, whereas ANI, NOL, and SPI advanced most in the availability of clinical utility studies and provide confirmation of a clinical outcome improvement. Analysis of economical value for public health effects is not yet publicly available for the studied monitors.

SUMMARY

This review proposes a stepwise structure for validation of new monitoring technology, which facilitates comparison between the level of validation of different devices and identifies the need for future research questions.

Current perioperative nociception monitoring and potential directions

Perioperative nociception-antinociception balance is essential for the prevention of adverse postoperative events. Estimating the nociception level helps optimize intraoperative management. In the past two decades, various nociception monitoring devices have been developed for the identification of intraoperative nociception. However, each type of nociception monitoring device has advantages and disadvantages, limiting their clinical application in particular patients and settings. Therefore, this review aimed to summarize the information on nociceptor monitoring in current clinical settings, explore each technique's particularities, and possible future directions to provide a reference for clinicians and researchers.

Development, Validation, and Comparison of a Novel Nociception/Anti-Nociception Monitor against Two Commercial Monitors in General Anesthesia

In this paper, we present the development and the validation of a novel index of nociception/anti-nociception (N/AN) based on skin impedance measurement in time and frequency domain with our prototype AnspecPro device. The primary objective of the study was to compare the Anspec-PRO device with two other commercial devices (Medasense, Medstorm). This comparison was designed to be conducted under the same conditions for the three devices. This was carried out during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) by investigating its outcomes related to noxious stimulus. In a carefully designed clinical protocol during general anesthesia from induction until emergence, we extract data for estimating individualized causal dynamic models between drug infusion and their monitored effect variables. Specifically, these are Propofol hypnotic drug to Bispectral index of hypnosis level and Remifentanil opioid drug to each of the three aforementioned devices. When compared, statistical analysis of the regions before and during the standardized stimulus shows consistent difference between regions for all devices and for all indices. These results suggest that the proposed methodology for data extraction and processing for AnspecPro delivers the same information as the two commercial devices.

The value of pupillary diameter in evaluating pain perception after awakening in patients undergoing general anesthesia during orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND

The pupillary response to tetanic electrical stimulation reflects the balance between nociceptive stimulation and analgesia. Although pupillary pain index (PPI) was utilized to predict postoperative pain, it depended on tetanic stimulation and was complex. We aim to describe the potential relationship between PD in the presence of surgical stimulation and pain levels after awakening.

METHODS

According to the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) score after extubation, the patients were divided into painless group (VRS = 0) and pain group (VRS ≥ 1). Pupillary diameter (PD) and pupillary light reflex velocity (PLRV) were compared between two groups when patients entered the operating room (T1), before incision (T2), 10 s after incision (T3), 30 s after incision (T4), 1 h after incision (T5), at the end of surgery (T6), shortly after extubation (T7), and when patients expressed pain clearly (T8). The magnitude of PD change (ΔPD) compared to the baseline value after anesthesia induction (T2) was calculated. The correlations between pupillary parameters and pain after awakening were calculated.

RESULTS

Patients with VRS ≥ 1 had greater PD than painless patients at T3-7 (P = 0.04, 0.04, 0.003, <0.001, <0.001), and it was positively correlated with VRS score after awakening at T4-7 (r = 0.188, 0.217, 0.684, 0.721). The ability of T6ΔPD to predict VRS ≥ 1 was strong [threshold: 20.53%, area under the curve (AUC): 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.97 ].

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that PD is a useful index to direct the individualized analgesics used during operation, to better avoid the occurrence of pain during the postoperative emergence period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2000040908, registration date: 15/12/2020).

Depth of Anesthesia and Nociception Monitoring: Current State and Vision For 2050

Anesthesia objectives have evolved into combining hypnosis, amnesia, analgesia, paralysis, and suppression of the sympathetic autonomic nervous system. Technological improvements have led to new monitoring strategies, aimed at translating a qualitative physiological state into quantitative metrics, but the optimal strategies for depth of anesthesia (DoA) and analgesia monitoring continue to stimulate debate. Historically, DoA monitoring used patient's movement as a surrogate of awareness. Pharmacokinetic models and metrics, including minimum alveolar concentration for inhaled anesthetics and target-controlled infusion models for intravenous anesthesia, provided further insights to clinicians, but electroencephalography and its derivatives (processed EEG; pEEG) offer the potential for personalization of anesthesia care. Current studies appear to affirm that pEEG monitoring decreases the quantity of anesthetics administered, diminishes postanesthesia care unit duration, and may reduce the occurrence of postoperative delirium (notwithstanding the difficulties of defining this condition). Major trials are underway to further elucidate the impact on postoperative cognitive dysfunction. In this manuscript, we discuss the Bispectral (BIS) index, Narcotrend monitor, Patient State Index, entropy-based monitoring, and Neurosense monitor, as well as middle latency evoked auditory potential, before exploring how these technologies could evolve in the upcoming years. In contrast to developments in pEEG monitors, nociception monitors remain by comparison underdeveloped and underutilized. Just as with anesthetic agents, excessive analgesia can lead to harmful side effects, whereas inadequate analgesia is associated with increased stress response, poorer hemodynamic conditions and coagulation, metabolic, and immune system dysregulation. Broadly, 3 distinct monitoring strategies have emerged: motor reflex, central nervous system, and autonomic nervous system monitoring. Generally, nociceptive monitors outperform basic clinical vital sign monitoring in reducing perioperative opioid use. This manuscript describes pupillometry, surgical pleth index, analgesia nociception index, and nociception level index, and suggest how future developments could impact their use. The final section of this review explores the profound implications of future monitoring technologies on anesthesiology practice and envisages 3 transformative scenarios: helping in creation of an optimal analgesic drug, the advent of bidirectional neuron-microelectronic interfaces, and the synergistic combination of hypnosis and virtual reality.

A novel non-invasive nociceptive monitoring approach fit for intracerebral surgery: a retrospective analysis

Background

Measuring depth of anesthesia during intracerebral surgery is an important task to guarantee patient safety, especially while the patient is fixated in a Mayfield-clamp. Processed electro-encephalography measurements have been established to monitor deep sedation. However, visualizing nociception has not been possible until recently and has not been evaluated for the neurosurgical setting. In this single-center, retrospective observational analysis, we routinely collected the nociceptive data via a nociception level monitor (NOL®) of 40 patients undergoing intracerebral tumor resection and aimed to determine if this monitoring technique is feasible and delivers relevant values to potentially base therapeutic decisions on.

Methods

Forty patients (age 56 ± 18 years) received total intravenous anesthesia and were non-invasively connected to the NOL® via a finger clip as well as a bispectral-index monitoring (BIS®) to confirm deep sedation. The measured nociception levels were retrospectively evaluated at specific time points of nociceptive stress (intubation, Mayfield-positioning, incision, extubation) and compared to standard vital signs.

Results

Nociceptive measurements were successfully performed in 35 patients. The largest increase in nociceptive stimulation occurred during intubation (NOL® 40 ± 16) followed by Mayfield positioning (NOL® 39 ± 16) and incision (NOL® 26 ± 12). Correlation with BIS measurements confirmed a sufficiently deep sedation during all analyzed time points (BIS 45 ± 13). Overall, patients showed an intraoperative NOL® score of 10 or less in 56% of total intervention time.

Conclusions

Nociceptive monitoring using the NOL® system during intracerebral surgery is feasible and might yield helpful information to support therapeutic decisions. This could help to reduce hyperanalgesia, facilitating shorter emergence periods and less postoperative complications. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further examine the potential benefits of this monitoring approach in a neurosurgical context.

Trial registration

German trial registry, registration number DRKS00029120.

Skin conductance algesimeter is unreliable during sudden perioperative temperature increases

OBJECTIVES

Pain assessment in anesthetized and non-communicative patients remains a challenge. Clinical signs such as tachycardia, hypertension, sweat and tears, have a low specificity for pain and should therefore ideally be replaced by more specific monitoring techniques. Skin conductance variability has been demonstrated to establish a patients' sensitivity to pain, but may be influenced by temperature changes that leads to profuse sweating. The aim of this pilot study was to test skin conductance changes during sudden temperature changes due to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) perfusation.

METHODS

We investigated skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) in ten consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Results from the SCA was compared to other standard physiological variables at seven time points during the surgical procedure, in particular during the period with hyperthermic intraabdominal perfusion leading to an increase in the patients core temperature.

RESULTS

Nine out of ten patients had an increase in the SCA measurements during the HIPEC phase correlating the increase in temperature.

CONCLUSION

SCA is unreliable to detect increased pain sensation during sudden perioperative temperature changes in adult patients.

[New Approaches in Perioperative Algesimetry]

The measurement of anaesthetic depth and muscle relaxation have been routine procedures during general anaesthesia for years. Quantification of intraoperative nociception, on the other hand, is still largely impossible. Various methods have been tested and commercialised for more than 10 years. However, a real breakthrough has not yet been achieved and the routine application of all methods available so far is not without problems. This article explains methodological similarities, but also points to specific aspects of various commercial solutions for perioperative algesimetry.

Early detection of deterioration in COVID-19 patients by continuous ward respiratory rate monitoring: a pilot prospective cohort study

Background

Tachypnea is among the earliest signs of pulmonary decompensation. Contactless continuous respiratory rate monitoring might be useful in isolated COVID-19 patients admitted in wards. We therefore aimed to determine whether continuous monitoring of respiratory patterns in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 predicts subsequent need for increased respiratory support.

Methods

Single-center pilot prospective cohort study in COVID-19 patients who were cared for in routine wards. COVID-19 patients who had at least one escalation of pulmonary management were matched to three non-escalated patients. Contactless respiratory monitoring was instituted after patients enrolled, and continued for 15 days unless hospital discharge, initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation, or death occurred. Clinicians were blinded to respiratory rate data from the continuous monitor. The exposures were respiratory features over rolling periods of 30 min, 24 h, and 72 h before respiratory care escalation. The primary outcome was a subsequent escalation in ventilatory support beyond a Venturi mask.

Results

Among 125 included patients, 13 exhibited at least one escalation and were each matched to three non-escalated patients. A total of 28 escalation events were matched to 84 non-escalation episodes. The 30-min mean respiratory rate in escalated patients was 23 breaths per minute (bpm) ranging from 13 to 40 bpm, similar to the 22 bpm in non-escalated patients, although with less variability (range 14 to 31 bpm). However, higher respiratory rate variability, especially skewness over 1 day, was associated with higher incidence of escalation events. Our overall model, based on continuous data, had a moderate accuracy with an AUC 0.81 (95%CI: 0.73, 0.88) and a good specificity 0.93 (95%CI: 0.87, 0.99).

Conclusion

Our pilot observational study suggests that respiratory rate variability as detected with continuous monitoring is associated with subsequent care escalation during the following 24 h. Continuous respiratory monitoring thus appears to be a valuable increment over intermittent monitoring.

Strengths and limitations

Our study was the initial evaluation of Circadia contactless respiratory monitoring in COVID-19 patients who are at special risk of pulmonary deterioration. The major limitation is that the analysis was largely post hoc and thus needs to be confirmed in an out-of-sample population.

Anesthesia Management via an Automated Control System for Propofol, Remifentanil, and Rocuronium Compared to Management by Anesthesiologists: An Investigator-Initiated Study

BACKGROUND

We previously developed an automated total intravenous anesthesia control system that uses new closed-loop system algorithms to administer propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium based on the bispectral index and train-of-four data. We recently improved this automated control system by adding a safety mechanism and using a modified monitoring device.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to closed-loop feedback control (automatic group) or the manual administration of propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium (manual group). The proportion of time during which the proper management of three-agent anesthesia was maintained during surgery was determined as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The proportion of time during which the three components of sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation were adequately controlled was 87.21 ± 12.79% in the automatic group, which was non-inferior to the proportion of 65.19 ± 20.16% in the manual group (p < 0.001). Adverse events during the operative or postoperative observation periods were significantly less frequent in the automatic group (54 patients, 90.0%) than in the manual group (60 patients, 100.0%; p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Our three-agent automated control system, which features an improved muscle relaxation monitor and safety mechanism added to the basic control algorithms, maintained sedation, analgesia, and muscle relaxation appropriately in a manner non-inferior to anesthesiologists without compromising safety.

Generalizability of nociception level as a measure of intraoperative nociceptive stimulation: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Nociception-guided intraoperative opioid administration might help reduce postoperative pain. A commonly used and validated nociception monitor system is nociception level (NOL), which provides the nociception index, ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 representing no nociception and 100 representing extreme nociception. We tested the hypothesis that NOL responses are similar in men and women given remifentanil and fentanyl, across various types of anesthesia, as a function of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status designations, and over a range of ages and body morphologies.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of trial data from eight prospective NOL validation studies. Among 522 noncardiac surgical patients enrolled in these studies, 447 were included in our analysis. We assessed NOL responses to various noxious and non-noxious stimuli.

RESULTS

The average NOL in response to 315 noxious stimuli was 47 ± 15 (95% CI = 45-49). The average NOL in response to 361 non-noxious stimuli was 10 ± 12 (95% CI = 9-11). NOL responses were similar in men and women, in patients given remifentanil and fentanyl, across various types of anesthesia, as a function of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status designations, and over a range of ages and body morphologies.

CONCLUSION

Nociception level appears to provide accurate estimates of intraoperative nociception over a broad range of patients and anesthetic conditions.

A randomized-controlled trial assessing the effect of intraoperative acupuncture on anesthesia-related parameters during gynecological oncology surgery

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

The present study examined the impact of intraoperative acupuncture on anesthesia-related parameters in patients undergoing gynecological oncology surgery.

METHODS

Participants underwent preoperative integrative oncology (IO) touch/relaxation treatments, followed by intraoperative acupuncture (Group A); preoperative IO treatments without acupuncture (Group B); or standard care only (Group C). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), MAP variability (mean of MAP standard deviation), bispectral index (BIS), and calculated blood pressure Average Real Variability (ARV) were measured intraoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients participated: Group A, 41; Group B, 24; Group C, 26. Among patients undergoing open laparotomy, Group A showed lower and more stable MAP and HR compared to Group B, (MAP, p = 0.026; HR, p = 0.029) and Group C (MAP, p = 0.025). Mean BIS, from incision to suture closing, was lower in Group A (vs. controls, p = 0.024). In patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, MAP was elevated within Group A (p = 0.026) throughout surgery, with MAP variability significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.023) and Group B (P = 0.013) 10 min post-incision (vs. pre-incision). All groups showed similar intraoperative and post-anesthesia use of analgesic medication.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative acupuncture was shown to reduce and stabilize MAP and HR, and reduce BIS in gynecology oncology patients undergoing laparotomy, with no impact on perioperative analgesic medication use. In the laparoscopic setting, intraoperative acupuncture was associated with elevated MAP. Further research is needed to explore the hemodynamic and BIS-associated benefits and risks of intraoperative acupuncture, and the impact on the use of analgesic drugs in response to these changes.

EEG-derived pain threshold index-guided versus standard care during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

Purpose

The pain threshold index (PTI), a novel index of nociception based on spontaneous EEG wavelet analysis, has been reported to provide reliable accuracy for predicting postoperative pain and hemodynamic reactivity. The present study is aimed to investigate whether PTI-guided analgesia reduces the pain intensity and rate of remedial analgesia in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).

Methods

A total of 122 females undergoing elective gynecologic surgeries had been randomized to receive either PTI-guided analgesia (PTI group) or standard clinical care (control group). Remifentanil administration in the PTI group was guided by PTI to maintain the value between 40 and 65, while that in the control group was guided by hemodynamic changes. The primary outcome was remedial analgesia rate in the PACU. The postoperative pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil requirements, opioid-related adverse events and perioperative serum stress hormone concentrations between the two groups were also compared.

Findings

It was found that 23 of 58 patients (40%) in the control group and 8 of 58 patients (14%) in the PTI group needed remedial analgesia. The relative risk of receiving remedial analgesia was 2.88 (95% CI, 1.40-5.89, P = 0.002) in the control group. Sufentanil consumption in the PACU (μg) was lower in the PTI group (P = 0.002) than in the control group. Remifentanil and propofol consumption, opioid-related adverse events between these two groups were comparable.

Implications

PTI-guided analgesia during gynaecologic operations resulted in 25.87% less remedial analgesia. However, studies with different PTI thresholds and larger, more diverse populations should be conducted to further demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of PTI.

Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Pediatric Abdominal Surgery: Guidance with Conventional Method and NOL: Case Series

Background

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a regional anesthesia technique that blocks both somatic and visceral nerve fibers. Despite its high analgesic potential, its mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. The ultrasound-guided ESP block, which can be easily performed, makes important contributions to the control of intraoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The follow-up of pain in the intraoperative period is usually done by evaluating the changes in hemodynamic parameters. Due to physiological differences in pediatric patients, it is more difficult to do this with only hemodynamic changes than in adult patients. Aim: The NOL® (Nociception Level) monitor calculates the nociception/pain score by evaluating many parameters through a proprietary algorithm. Our primary aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness of ESP block with an advanced pain monitor in this patient group; our secondary aim was to investigate the necessity of pain monitors in the pediatric patient group.

Methods

In this case series, we applied intraoperative NOL® monitoring in addition to standard monitoring (ECG, SpO2, heart rate, EtCO₂) in pediatric patients (16 cases) who were scheduled for abdominal surgery and underwent ESP block.

Results

Considering the hemodynamic data, NOL values, postoperative pain scores, side effects, and complications, it was concluded that ESP block can be used safely in this patient group. Although the hemodynamic data and the NOL® index were compatible with each other after a nociceptive stimulus, the NOL index was less affected by other variables and gave the clinician clearer information about pain.

Nociception Level Index-Guided Intraoperative Analgesia for Improved Postoperative Recovery: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Nociception is the physiological response to nociceptive stimuli, normally experienced as pain. During general anesthesia, patients experience and respond to nociceptive stimuli by increasing blood pressure and heart rate if not controlled by preemptive analgesia. The PMD-200 system from Medasense (Ramat Gan, Israel) evaluates the balance between nociceptive stimuli and analgesia during general anesthesia and generates the nociception level (NOL) index from a single finger probe. NOL is a unitless index ranging from 0 to 100, with values exceeding 25 indicating that nociception exceeds analgesia. We aimed to demonstrate that titrating intraoperative opioid administration to keep NOL <25 optimizes intraoperative opioid dosing. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that pain scores during the initial 60 minutes of recovery are lower in patients managed with NOL-guided fentanyl than in patients given fentanyl per clinical routine.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, single-center trial of patients having major abdominal open and laparoscopic surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intraoperative NOL-guided fentanyl administration or fentanyl given per clinical routine. The primary outcome was pain score (0-10 verbal response scale) at 10-minute intervals during the initial 60 minutes of recovery. Our secondary outcome was a measure of adequate analgesia, defined as a pain score <5, assessed separately at each interval.

RESULTS

With a planned maximum sample size of 144, the study was stopped for futility after enrolling 72 patients from November 2020 to October 2021. Thirty-five patients were assigned to NOL-guided analgesic dosing and 37 to routine care. Patients in the NOL group spent significantly less time with a NOL index >25 (median reduction [95% confidence interval {CI}] of 14 [4-25] minutes) were given nearly twice as much intraoperative fentanyl (median [quartiles] 500 [330, 780] vs 300 [200, 330] µg), and required about half as much morphine in the recovery period (3.3 [0, 8] vs 7.7 [0, 13] mg). However, in the primary outcome analysis, NOL did not reduce pain scores in the first 60 minutes after awakening, assessed in a linear mixed effects model with mean (standard error [SE]) of 4.12 (0.59) for NOL and 4.04 (0.58) for routine care, and estimated difference in means of 0.08 (-1.43, 1.58), P = .895.

CONCLUSIONS

More intraoperative fentanyl was given in NOL-guided patients, but NOL guidance did not reduce initial postoperative pain scores.

Nociception level response to calibrated stimulations in children: First assessment of the nociception level index in pediatric anesthesia

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative monitoring of nociception has made great progress in adult anesthesia. However, pediatric data are scarce. The Nociception Level (NOL) is one of the most recent indexes of nociception. Its originality is that it provides a multiparametric assessment of nociception. In adults, NOL monitoring allowed lower perioperative opioid requirements, hemodynamic stability, and qualitative postoperative analgesia. So far, the NOL has never been used in children. Our objective was to validate the ability of NOL to provide a quantitative assessment of nociception in anesthetized children.

METHODS

In 5-12 years old children anesthetized with sevoflurane and alfentanil (10 µg kg^-1), before surgical incision, we performed three standardized tetanic stimulations (5 s, 100 Hz) of different intensities (10-30-60 mA) in a randomized order. NOL, heart rate, blood pressure and Analgesia-Nociception Index variations were assessed after each stimulation.

RESULTS

Thirty children were included. Data were analyzed with a covariance pattern linear mixed regression model. NOL increased after the stimulations (p < 0.05 at each intensity). NOL response was influenced by stimulation intensity (p < 0.001). Heart rate and blood pressure were barely modified by the stimulations. Analgesia-Nociception Index decreased after the stimulations (p < 0.001 at each intensity). Analgesia-Nociception index response was not influenced by stimulation intensity (p = 0.064). NOL and Analgesia-Nociception Index responses were significantly correlated (Pearson r = 0.47; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NOL allows a quantitative assessment of nociception under anesthesia in 5-12 years-old children. This study provides a solid basis for all future investigations on NOL monitoring in pediatric anesthesia.

REGISTRATION

NCT05233449.

The Validity of Vital Signs for Pain Assessment in critically Ill Adults: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Pain assessment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging because many patients are unable to self-report or exhibit pain-related behaviors. In such situations, vital signs (VS) through continuous monitoring are alternative cues for pain assessment. This review aimed to describe the reliability and validity of VS for ICU pain assessment.

DESIGN

Narrative review of the literature.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane.

REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS

A narrative review was conducted with a comprehensive search in four databases. Search terms included VS, pain assessment, and ICU.

RESULTS

Out of 1,359 results, 30 studies from 17 countries were included. Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate were most used for ICU pain assessment. Assessments were performed at rest before procedures, during nociceptive and non-nociceptive procedures, and after procedures. Increases in respiratory rate were clinically significant by more than 25% during nociceptive procedures (e.g., endotracheal suctioning, turning) compared with rest/pre-procedures in five studies. Correlations of VS with self-reported pain (reference standard measure) and behavioral pain scores (alternative measure) were absent or weak.

CONCLUSIONS

VS are not valid indicators for ICU pain assessment. Increases of respiratory rate may be a cue for the detection of pain. However, fluctuations in respiratory rate can be influenced by opioids or controlled ventilation mode. Our results dissuade the use of VS for pain assessment because of the lack of association with ICU pain reference standards. Other physiologic measures of pain in critically ill adults should be explored.

Prediction of acute postoperative pain based on intraoperative nociception level (NOL) index values: the impact of machine learning-based analysis

The relationship between intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain is still not well established. The nociception level (NOL) Index (Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel) uses a multiparametric approach to provide a 0-100 nociception score. The objective of the ancillary analysis of the NOLGYN study was to evaluate the ability of a machine-learning aglorithm to predict moderate to severe acute postoperative pain based on intraoperative NOL values. Our study uses the data from the NOLGYN study, a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the impact of NOL-guided intraoperative administration of fentanyl on overall fentanyl consumption compared to standard of care. Seventy patients (ASA class I-III, aged 18-75 years) scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery were enrolled. Variables included baseline demographics, NOL reaction to incision or intubation, median NOL during surgery, NOL time-weighted average (TWA) above or under manufacturers' recommended thresholds (10-25), and percentage of surgical time spent with NOL > 25 or < 10. We evaluated different machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative pain. Performance was assessed using cross-validated area under the ROC curve (CV-AUC). Of the 66 patients analyzed, 42 (63.6%) experienced moderate to severe pain. NOL post-intubation (42.8 (31.8-50.6) vs. 34.8 (25.6-41.3), p = 0.05), median NOL during surgery (13 (11-15) vs. 11 (8-13), p = 0.027), percentage of surgical time spent with NOL > 25 (23% (18-18) vs. 20% (15-24), p = 0.036), NOL TWA < 10 (2.54 (2.1-3.0) vs. 2.86 (2.48-3.62), p = 0.044) and percentage of surgical time spent with NOL < 10 (41% (36-47) vs. 47% (40-55), p = 0.022) were associated with moderate to severe PACU pain. Corresponding ROC AUC for the prediction of moderate to severe PACU pain were 0.65 [0.51-0.79], 0.66 [0.52-0.81], 0.66 [0.52-0.79], 0.65 [0.51-0.79] and 0.67 [0.53-0.81]. Penalized logistic regression achieved the best performance with a 0.753 (0.718-0.788) CV-AUC. Our results, even if limited by the small number of patients, suggest that acute postoperative pain is better predicted by a multivariate machine-learning algorithm rather than individual intraoperative nociception variables. Further larger multicentric trials are highly recommended to better understand the relationship between intraoperative nociception and acute postoperative pain.Trial registration Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in October 2018 (NCT03776838).

Intraoperative use of the machine learning-derived nociception level monitor results in less pain in the first 90 min after surgery

In this pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials, intraoperative opioid dosing based on the nociception level-index produced less pain compared to standard care with a difference in pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit of 1.5 (95% CI 0.8-2.2) points on an 11-point scale. The proportion of patients with severe pain was lower by 70%. Severe postoperative pain remains a significant problem and associates with several adverse outcomes. Here, we determined whether the application of a monitor that detects intraoperative nociceptive events, based on machine learning technology, and treatment of such events reduces pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). To that end, we performed a pooled analysis of two trials in adult patients, undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, on the effect of intraoperative nociception level monitor (NOL)-guided fentanyl dosing on PACU pain was performed. Patients received NOL-guided fentanyl dosing or standard care (fentanyl dosing based on hemodynamic parameters). Goal of the intervention was to keep NOL at values that indicated absence of nociception. The primary endpoint of the study was the median pain score obtained in the first 90 min in the PACU. Pain scores were collected at 15 min intervals on an 11-point Likert scale. Data from 125 patients (55 men, 70 women, age range 21-86 years) were analyzed. Sixty-one patients received NOL-guided fentanyl dosing and 64 standard care. Median PACU pain score was 1.5 points (0.8-2.2) lower in the NOL group compared to the standard care; the proportion of patients with severe pain was 70% lower in the NOL group (p = 0.045). The only significant factor associated with increased odds for severe pain was the standard of care compared to NOL treatment (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.4 -25.9, p = 0.017). The use of a machine learning-based technology to guide opioid dosing during major abdominal surgery resulted in reduced PACU pain scores with less patients in severe pain.

Nociception level index variations in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a pilot study

The nociception level index (NOL) is a multi-parameter index that incorporates changes in autonomic parameters to evaluate nociception, with more painful stimuli causing more pronounced index variations. How this nociception monitor relates to the pain experience is uncertain, and patients with chronic pain may respond differently to acute pain due to alterations in pain processing. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate NOL index variations after a painful physiotherapy exercise in patients with upper limb complex regional pain syndrome. Baseline NOL indexes were recorded using a finger probe (PMD-200™ Monitor, Medasense, Israel) and patient reported baseline pain scores using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients then performed a painful physiotherapy exercise and NOL index and pain scores were again recorded. The same procedure and recordings were repeated after a stellate ganglion block. Data were analyzed using a paired Student T test and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Twenty patients (12/20 female, 10/20 right-sided) were included in this study. Patients reported moderate baseline pain (4.0 ± 2.7) despite having a low baseline NOL index (7.66 ± 5.76 out of 100). NRS and NOL index scores increased significantly during exercise, both before and after the block. The NOL index increased significantly when patients reported increased pain, indicating that it could eventually be useful in the objective assessment of acute pain in the chronic pain patients. However, NOL index was not able to reflect pain levels at rest, before the painful stimulation, in this chronic pain population. Further studies are needed to better assess NOL index utility at rest and to confirm these findings in this specific chronic pain population.

Nociception Level Index-Directed Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background and Objectives: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a multimodal opioid-sparing component, providing chest-wall analgesia of variable extent, duration, and intensity. The objective was to examine the ESPB effect on perioperative opioid usage and postoperative rehabilitation when used within a Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthetic protocol. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study was performed in adult patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery in a single tertiary hospital. Eighty-three adult patients who met eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to group 1 (Control, n = 43) and group 2 (ESPB, n = 40) and received general anesthesia with NOL index-directed fentanyl dosing. Preoperatively, group 2 also received bilateral single-shot ultrasound-guided ESPB (1.5 mg/kg/side 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexamethasone 8 mg/20 mL). Postoperatively, both groups received intravenous paracetamol (1 g every 6 h). Morphine (0.03 mg/kg) was administered for numeric rating scale (NRS) scores ≥4. Results: The median (IQR, 25th−75th percentiles) intraoperative fentanyl and 48 h morphine dose in group 2-to-group 1 were 1.2 (1.1−1.5) vs. 4.5 (3.8−5.5) µg·kg−1·h−1 (p < 0.001) and 22.1 (0−40.4) vs. 60.6 (40−95.7) µg/kg (p < 0.001). The median (IQR) time to extubation in group 2-to-group 1 was 90 (60−105) vs. 360 (285−510) min (p < 0.001). Two hours after ICU admission, 87.5% of ESPB patients were extubated compared to 0% of controls (p < 0.001), and 87.5% were weaned off norepinephrine compared to 46.5% of controls (p < 0.001). The median NRS scores at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after extubation were significantly decreased in group 2. There was no difference in opioid-related adverse events and length of stay. Conclusions: NOL index-directed ESPB reduced intraoperative fentanyl by 73.3% and 48 h morphine by 63.5%. It also hastened the extubation and liberation from vasopressor support and improved postoperative analgesia.

Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard practice for opioid administration titration during general anesthesia.

Methods

We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trial, and Web of Science from inception up to August 1, 2021, to identify relevant articles, and extracted the relevant data. Intraoperative opioid administration, extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were compared between patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance and patients receiving standard management. The standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to assess the significance of differences. The risk ratio (RR), with 95% CI, was used to assess the difference in incidence of PONV. Heterogeneity among the included trials was evaluated by the I² test. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 21 RCTs (with 1957 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Intraoperative opioid administration was significantly lower in patients receiving nociception monitor-guided analgesia than in patients receiving standard management (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.36; P < 0.001). However, pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption were not significantly higher in the former group. Considerable heterogeneity was found among the studies (92%). Extubation time was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.03; P = 0.02) and the incidence of PONV significantly lower (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05) in patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance.

Conclusions

Intraoperative nociception monitoring guidance may reduce intraoperative opioid administration and appears to be a viable strategy for intraoperative titration of opioids.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=273619, identifier: CRD42019129776.

Reduced postoperative pain in patients receiving nociception monitor guided analgesia during elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial

The Nociception Level index (NOL™) is a multiparameter index, based on artificial intelligence for the monitoring of nociception during anesthesia. We studied the influence of NOL-guided analgesia on postoperative pain scores in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery during sevoflurane/fentanyl anesthesia. This study was designed as a single-center, prospective randomized, controlled study. After Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 75 ASA 1–3 adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, were randomized to NOL-guided fentanyl dosing (NOL) or standard care (SOC) and completed the study. The sevoflurane target MAC range was 0.8–1.2. In the NOL-guided group (N = 36), when NOL values were > 25 for at least 1 min, a weight adjusted fentanyl bolus was administered. In the control group (N = 39) fentanyl administration was based on hemodynamic indices and clinician judgement. After surgery, pain, was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scale, ranging from 0 to 10, at 15 min intervals for 180 min or until patient discharge from the PACU. Median postoperative pain scores reported were 3.0 [interquartile range 0.0–5.0] and 5.0 [3.0–6.0] at 90 min in NOL-guided and control groups respectively (Bootstrap corrected actual difference 1.5, 95% confidence interval 0.4–2.6). There was no difference in postoperative morphine consumption or intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Postoperative pain scores were significantly improved in nociception level index-guided patients. We attribute this to more objective fentanyl dosing when timed to actual nociceptive stimuli during anesthesia, contributing to lower levels of sympathetic activation and surgical stress. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03970291 date of registration May 31, 2019.

Quantitative assessment of a pediatric nociception monitor in children under sevoflurane anesthesia

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative monitoring of nociception has recently made substantial progress in adult anesthesia. In contrast, pediatric data are scarce. Newborn-Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE index, Mdoloris Medical Systems, Loos, France) is the first nociception index specifically designed for young children. It is a dimensionless index comprised between 0 and 100. Two previous studies suggested that NIPE could indeed 'detect' nociception in anesthetized children. The objective of our study was to investigate if NIPE allowed to detect and to provide a quantitative assessment of nociception in children.

METHODS

Children were anesthetized with sevoflurane, and received a bolus of alfentanil (10 µg/kg before intubation). Before surgical incision, each participant received three tetanic stimulations (5 s, 100 Hertz) with a 5 min interval, in a randomized order: 10, 30 and 60 milliamps. NIPE and heart rate variations were assessed after each stimulation.

RESULTS

Thirty children (2.4±1.6 years) were included. Mean delay between alfentanil and the first stimulation was 19±4 min. Mean baseline NIPE was 75±10. NIPE variation after the stimulations was significant at 10, 30 and 60 mA (linear mixed regression model, p<0.001). The intensity of stimulation significantly influenced the amplitude of NIPE variation (linear mixed regression model p<0.001), but had no statistically significant effect on heart rate variation (p=0.52).

DISCUSSION

NIPE might allow a quantitative assessment of nociception in young children in these anesthetic conditions. This study provides a basis for future research investigating the potential benefits of NIPE-guided intraoperative analgesia in pediatric anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04381637.

Effect of combined intraoperative use of the Nociception Level (NOL) and bispectral (BIS) indexes on desflurane administration

BACKGROUND

Currently, nociception monitors are not part of standard anaesthesia care. We investigated whether combined intraoperative nociception (NOL index) and anaesthesia (BIS index) monitoring during general anaesthesia would reduce anaesthetics consumption and enhance intraoperative safety and postoperative recovery when compared to standard of care monitoring (SOC).

METHODS

In this randomised study, we included 60 patients undergoing colonic surgery under desflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia and epidural analgesia. Patients received either standard monitoring or combined BIS + NOL index monitoring. In the monitored group, remifentanil infusion was titrated to achieve a NOL index below 20. Desflurane was adjusted to BIS values (45-55). In the SOC group, remifentanil and desflurane were titrated on vital signs and MAC. The primary outcome was intraoperative desflurane consumption.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were analysed. Desflurane administration was reduced in the monitored group from 0.25 ± 0.05 to 0.20 ± 0.06 mL kg^-1 h^-1 (p < 0.001). The cumulative time with a BIS under 40 was significantly higher in the SOC group with a median time of 12.6 min (95% CI: 0.6-80.0) versus 2.0 min (95% CI: 0.3-5.83) (p = 0.023). Time for extubation was significantly shorter in the monitored group: 4.4 min (95% CI: 2.4-4.9) versus 6.28 min (95% IC: 5.0-8.2) (p = 0.003). We observed no differences in remifentanil or phenylephrine requirements during anaesthesia or in postoperative outcome measures, such as postoperative pain, opioid consumption, neurocognitive recovery.

CONCLUSION

Combined intraoperative monitoring of anaesthesia and nociception during colonic surgery resulted in less desflurane consumption and quicker extubation time compared to standard clinical care monitoring.

Monitoring of analgesia level during general anesthesia in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Monitoring of intraoperative nociception has made substantial progress in adult anesthesia during the last 10 years. Several monitors have been validated and their use has been associated with intraoperative or postoperative benefits in the adult population. In pediatric anesthesia, less data are available. However, several recent publications have assessed the performance of nociception monitors in children, and investigated their potential benefits in this context. This review will describe the main validated intraoperative nociception monitors, summarize adult findings and describe the available pediatric data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Six intraoperative nociception indices were included in this review. Among them, four have shown promising results in children: Surgical Pleth Index (GE-Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland), Analgesia-Nociception Index (Mdoloris Medical Systems, Loos, France), Newborn-Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (Mdoloris Medical Systems), and Pupillometry (IDMED, Marseille, France). The relevance of Skin Conductance (MedStorm innovations, AS, Oslo, Norway) under general anesthesia could not be established. Finally, the Nociception Level (Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel) still requires to be investigated in children.

SUMMARY

To date, four monitors may provide a relevant assessment of intraoperative nociception in children. However, the potential clinical benefits associated with their use to guide analgesia remain to be demonstrated.

Identification of the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of intravenous fentanyl using the Nociception Level (NOL) index versus clinical parameters in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A secondary analysis of the NOLGYN study

BACKGROUND

While we typically assess nociception balance during general anaesthesia through clinical parameters such as heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) variation, these parameters are not specific to nociception.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that using the Nociception Level (NOL) index to assess the analgesic effect of a fentanyl bolus would be superior to standard clinical parameters.

DESIGN

Ancillary study of the NOLGYN study, a randomized controlled trial comparing intraoperative NOL-guided administration of fentanyl (NOL group) versus standardized care (SC group).

SETTING

University hospital in Montréal, Canada between November 2018, and December 2019.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

INTERVENTION

In our evaluation of intraoperative nociception, we analyzed the analgesic effect of fentanyl using three parameters: MAP, HR, and the Nociception Level (NOL) index. All fentanyl injection events were extracted from the database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary endpoint was the difference between values before and after each injection.

RESULTS

The median of the NOL index before fentanyl injection was 30.5 (IQR 19.4 to 40.7) versus 18.9 (IQR 11.5 to 27.4) after (P < 0.001). The median of MAP was 106.4 mmHg (IQR 99.9 to 113.4) before injection versus 103.2 mmHg (IQR 97.5 to 110.7) after (P < 0.001). The median of HR before injection was 74.2 (IQR 64.2 to 83.8) versus 72.4 (IQR 63.4 to 81.3) after (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The NOL index, HR, and MAP all statistically discriminated the analgesic effect of fentanyl but only the NOL index proved clinically relevant to identify the analgesic effect of one fentanyl injection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03776838) registered in October 2018.

Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain: Time for increased rigor

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) results from a cascade of events in the peripheral and central nervous systems following surgery. Several clinical predictors, including the prior pain state, premorbid psychological state (e.g., anxiety, catastrophizing), intraoperative surgical load (establishment of peripheral and central sensitization), and acute postoperative pain management, may contribute to the patient's risk of developing CPSP. However, research on the neurobiological and biobehavioral mechanisms contributing to pediatric CPSP and effective preemptive/treatment strategies are still lacking. Here we evaluate the perisurgical process by identifying key problems and propose potential solutions for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative pain states to both prevent and manage the transition of acute to chronic pain. We propose an eight-step process involving preemptive and preventative analgesia, behavioral interventions, and the use of biomarkers (brain-based, inflammatory, or genetic) to facilitate timely evaluation and treatment of premorbid psychological factors, ongoing surgical pain, and postoperative pain to provide an overall improved outcome. By achieving this, we can begin to establish personalized precision medicine for children and adolescents presenting to surgery and subsequent treatment selection.

Different perspectives for monitoring nociception during general anesthesia

Safe anesthesia is achieved using objective methods that estimate the patient’s state during different phases of surgery. A patient’s state under anesthesia is characterized by three major aspects, which are linked to the main effects produced by each of the families of anesthetic agents administered: hypnosis, analgesia, and muscular relaxation.

While quantification techniques designed to assess muscular relaxation under neuromuscular blocking agents have a relatively long history with a high degree of standardization and understanding (e.g., the train-of-four), the knowledge and techniques used to the depth of hypnosis assessment suffer from a lesser degree in both standardization and interpretation due to brain complexity.

The problem of standardization and interpretation in the analgesia and nociception assessment increases since it involves more systems, the central nervous system, and the autonomic nervous system.

This helps to explain why there are multiple a priori valid approaches to develop nociception monitoring from different interpretations and physiological bases of noxious stimuli processing. Thus, in this review, the current monitoring technologies clinically available for estimating a patient’s nociception under general anesthesia are described.

Electroencephalogram-derived pain index for evaluating pain during labor

Background

The discriminative ability of a point-of-care electroencephalogram (EEG)-derived pain index (Pi) for objectively assessing pain has been validated in chronic pain patients. The current study aimed to determine its feasibility in assessing labor pain in an obstetric setting.

Methods

Parturients were enrolled from the delivery room at the department of obstetrics in a tertiary hospital between February and June of 2018. Pi values and relevant numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were collected at different stages of labor in the presence or absence of epidural analgesia. The correlation between Pi values and NRS scores was analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to estimate the discriminative capability of Pi to detect labor pain in parturients.

Results

Eighty paturients were eligible for inclusion. The Pearson correlation analysis exhibited a positive correlation between Pi values and NRS scores in parturients (r = 0.768, P < 0.001). The ROC analysis revealed a cut-off Pi value of 18.37 to discriminate between mild and moderate-to-severe labor pain in parturients. Further analysis indicated that Pi values had the best diagnostic accuracy reflected by the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.857, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.767 and 0.833, respectively, and a Youden index of 0.6. Subgroup analyses further substantiated the correlations between Pi values and NRS scores, especially in parturients with higher pain intensity.

Conclusion

This study indicates that Pi values derived from EEGs significantly correlate with the NRS scores, and can serve as a way to quantitatively and objectively evaluate labor pain in parturients.

[Does NoL monitoring affect opioid consumption during da Vinci prostatectomy?]

BACKGROUND

Administration of opioids to suppress pain plays a major role in modern anesthesia. Measuring depth of hypnosis and neuromuscular recovery are already well established, and devices for pain monitoring are available. Nonetheless pain monitoring is rare in clinical practice. Recently, the pain monitoring device PMD200 (Medasense Biometrics™ , Israel) was introduced. It non-invasively measures heart rate, heart rate variability, skin resistance, resistance variability, temperature and movement to calculate a nociception level (NoL) index. The NoL index range starts at zero, which is equivalent to being painless, and goes up to a value of 100. The validity and reliability of NoL monitoring is the content of current studies.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis if the use of the PMD200 significantly reduces opioid consumption during da Vinci prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 50 male patients were included in this randomized, single blinded study. Exclusion criteria were arrhythmia because the pain monitoring device requires a sinus rhythm for reliable results. Patients received a weight-adjusted sufentanil bolus (0.3 µg/kg ideal body weight) during induction of anesthesia. Additionally, they received 10 µg of sufentanil before skin incision. Both groups received total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and continuous muscle relaxation through cis-atracurium. In the control group (CONT; n = 26), a standardized sufentanil bolus of 10 µg were administered by common criteria (heart rate/blood pressure increase, lacrimation, gut feeling) at the anesthesiologist's discretion. In the intervention group (INT; n = 24), patients received the standardized sufentanil bolus when the NoL index was above 25 for 2 min, which corresponds to the manufacturer's recommendation. The NoL index and bolus administrations were recorded for every patient. In the control group, the display of the pain monitor showing the NoL index was not visible for the anesthesiologist. Postoperatively, pain/nausea scores and piritramide consumption were taken every 10 min for 1h in the recovery room. None of the patients had prior chronic pain with long-term use of painkillers. Statistics were done using Mann-Whitney U‑test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Levene test.

RESULTS

Sufentanil bolus administrations, normalized for duration of surgery, were not significantly lower in the intervention group (p = 0.065). We noticed a significant difference in variation of opioid administrations (p = 0.033). Sufentanil boluses per hour in the INT were normally distributed (p = 0.2), whereas in CONT they were not (p = 0.003). Postoperative data like nausea, opioid consumption and pain scale showed no differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of PMD200 did not significantly reduce cumulative opioid consumption. Following on we must reject the initial hypothesis. The difference in sufentanil bolus variances may point to an individualized antinociceptive therapy when NoL monitoring is used. We suppose patients with high opioid demands are detected and patients with low opioid demands did not receive unnecessary opioids. This assumption is only true if the PMD200 measures the entity pain. Further studies with more participants during surgery with higher tissue damage could lead to more convincing data and conclusions.

Exploration of a Multi-Parameter Technology for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Patients After Cardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit: The Nociception Level Index (NOL)TM

Introduction

The aim of this study was to explore the use of a multi-parameter technology, the Nociception Level (NOL) index (Medasense Biometrics Ltd, Ramat Gan, Israel), for pain assessment in postoperative awake patients after cardiac surgery during non-nociceptive and nociceptive procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials and Methods

A prospective cohort repeated-measures design was used. Patients were included if they were in the ICU after undergoing cardiac surgery and if they could self-report their pain. A non-invasive probe was placed on the patient’s finger for the continuous monitoring of the NOL index. Patients’ self-reports of pain and anxiety (0–10 Numeric Rating Scale or NRS), and behavioral scores with the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) were obtained before and during a non-nociceptive procedure (ie, non-invasive blood pressure [NIBP] using cuff inflation), and before, during and after a nociceptive procedure (ie, chest tube removal [CTR]) for a total of five time points. Non-parametric tests were used to compare scores at different time points, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.

Results

Fifty-four patients were included in the analysis. The NOL index, pain and anxiety scores were significantly higher during CTR compared to rest and NIBP (p < 0.001). During CTR, the NOL was associated with self-reported pain intensity and unpleasantness but not with anxiety and CPOT scores. The NOL showed a modest performance in detecting pain (NRS ≥1 and ≥5) in this sample with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 61% to 85%.

Conclusion

The NOL index was able to discriminate between a non-nociceptive and a nociceptive procedure and was associated with self-reported pain. Further validation testing of the NOL is necessary in a heterogeneous sample of ICU patients.

Intra-operative nociceptive responses and postoperative major complications after gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical procedures stimulate nociception and induce physiological responses according to the balance between nociception and antinociception. The severity of surgical stimuli is associated with major postoperative complications. Although an intra-operative quantitative index representing surgical invasiveness would be useful for anaesthetic management to predict and prevent major complications, no such index is available.

OBJECTIVES

To identify associations between major complications after gastrointestinal surgery and intra-operative quantitative values from intra-operative nociception monitoring.

DESIGN

A multi-institutional observational study.

SETTING

Two university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Consecutive adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Averaged values of nociceptive response index from start to end of surgery (mean NR index) and risk scores of the Surgical Mortality Probability Model (S-MPM) were calculated. Pre and postoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were obtained. After receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, all patients were divided into groups with high and low mean nociceptive response index. Associations between mean nociceptive response index and postoperative major complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade at least IIIa, were examined using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

ROC curve analysis showed a nociceptive response index cut-off value for major complications of 0.83, and we divided patients into two groups with mean nociceptive response index less than 0.83 and at least 0.83. The incidence of major complications was significantly higher in patients with mean nociceptive response index at least 0.83 (23.1%; n = 346) than in patients with mean nociceptive response index less than 0.83 (7.7%; n = 443; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed emergency surgery, S-MPM risk score, mean nociceptive response index and postoperative CRP levels as independent risk factors for major complications.

CONCLUSION

Mean nociceptive response index during surgery likely correlates with major complications after gastrointestinal surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current observational study had no intervention, and was therefore, not registered.

Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review

Maintaining optimum analgesia in anesthetized patients is challenging due to the inability to self-report pain or exhibit pain-related behaviours. The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) (based on heart rate variability [HRV]) and the Nociception Level Index (NOL) (based on HRV, photoplethysmography, skin conductance, and temperature) both include HRV and provide continuous index monitoring for nociception assessment. The research question was: "What are the validation strategies of the NOL and ANI for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients?". The objectives were to describe and analyze the validation strategies and results. A systematized review was conducted using a comprehensive search with keywords under three concepts (nociception/pain, ANI/NOL, and validity) in four databases. A quality assessment using an adapted GRADE approach for measurement tools, and a risk of bias assessment using QUADAS-2 tool were performed by two reviewers. Out of 525 results, 15 validation studies were included. Strategies included hypothesis testing, discriminative, and criterion validation. Significant changes in ANI/NOL values were found in response to nociceptive stimuli at different opioid concentrations (hypothesis testing). Higher ANI/NOL values were observed during nociceptive stimuli (discriminative). AUCs ranging from 0.83 to 0.99 were obtained to detect nociceptive stimuli (criterion). Both technologies performed superiorly in detecting nociceptive stimuli compared to individual monitoring of HR and blood pressure. Although the aforementioned validation strategies are deemed appropriate, in the absence of a gold standard, criterion validation findings should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, reliability could be examined using test-retest with consistent ANI/NOL values during a stable time-interval.

"Impact of Nociception Level (NOL) index intraoperative guidance of fentanyl administration on opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores and recovery in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. A randomized controlled trial"

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The Nociception Level (NOL) index uses a multiparametric approach to measure the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic systems activity. Recently, a strong correlation between the NOL index response to nociceptive stimuli and the level of opioid analgesia during surgery was reported. Others observed that intraoperative doses of remifentanil and sufentanil were reduced when the NOL index was used. So far, no study has evaluated the impact of NOL-guided fentanyl antinociception in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. The primary hypothesis of this present study was to evaluate whether intraoperative NOL-guided fentanyl administration would reduce intra-operative opioid consumption. Secondary hypotheses were to assess whether this would lead to lower postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, as well as improved postoperative outcomes.

SETTING

University hospital, operating room.

PATIENTS

70 adult patients, ASA 1-3, scheduled for total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized into 2 groups: SOC (standardization of care) and NOL (using the NOL index to guide the administration of fentanyl). The depth of anesthesia was monitored with BIS™. Intraoperative fentanyl boluses were administered based on heart rate and mean arterial pressure variations in the SOC group, and NOL index for the NOL group.

MEASUREMENTS

Fentanyl total intraoperative dose administered was collected and also averaged per hour. Pain scores and hydromorphone consumption were assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit and up to 24 h.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-six patients completed the study, 33 in each group. Total intraoperative fentanyl administration was not different between the two groups (217 (70) in the NOL group vs 280 (210) in the SOC group (P = 0.11)). Nevertheless, intraoperative fentanyl administration per hour was reduced by 25% in the NOL-guided group compared to the SOC group: 81 (24) vs 108 (66) μg.h^-1, respectively (P = 0.03). Hydromorphone consumption and pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit and at 24 h were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

NOL-guided analgesia allowed for a 22% reduction of the total amount of intraoperative fentanyl which was not significant. Nevertheless, results reported a significant reduction by 25% in the doses of fentanyl averaged per hour of surgery and administered in the NOL-guided group compared with the standardized practice in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. The pain measured postoperatively was similar in the two groups while the average postoperative consumption of opioids to achieve the same level of pain scores in post-anesthesia care unit and at 24 h was not significantly reduced. Further larger multicenter studies centered towards postoperative outcomes are needed.

[Nociception monitoring : Method for intraoperative opioid control?]

The intraoperative dosing of opioids is a challenge in routine anesthesia as the potential effects of intraoperative overdosing and underdosing are not completely understood. In recent years an increasing number of monitors were approved, which were developed for the detection of intraoperative nociception and therefore should enable a better control of opioid titration. The nociception monitoring devices use either continuous hemodynamic, galvanic or thermal biosignals reflecting the balance between parasympathetic and sympathetic activity, measure the pupil dilatation reflex or the nociceptive flexor reflex as a reflexive response to application of standardized nociceptive stimulation. This review article presents the currently available nociception monitors. Most of these monitoring devices detect nociceptive stimulations with higher sensitivity and specificity than changes in heart rate, blood pressure or sedation depth monitoring devices. There are only few studies on the effect of opioid titration guided by nociception monitoring and the possible postoperative benefits of these devices. All nociception monitoring techniques are subject to specific limitations either due to perioperative confounders (e.g. hypovolemia) or special accompanying medical conditions (e.g. muscle relaxation). There is an ongoing discussion about the clinical relevance of nociceptive stimulation in general anesthesia and the effect on patient outcome. Initial results for individual monitor systems show a reduction in opioid consumption and in postoperative pain level. Nevertheless, current evidence does not enable the routine use of nociception monitoring devices to be recommended as a clear beneficial effect on long-term outcome has not yet been proven.