Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Postpartum Pain Evaluation and Management

Incorporating machine learning and statistical methods to address maternal healthcare disparities in US: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Maternal health disparities are recognized as a significant public health challenge, with pronounced disparities evident across racial, socioeconomic, and geographic dimensions. Although healthcare technologies have advanced, these disparities remain primarily unaddressed, indicating that enhanced analytical approaches are needed.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to evaluate the impact of machine learning (ML) and statistical methods on identifying and addressing maternal health disparities and to outline future research directions for enhancing these methodologies.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA guidelines, the review of studies employing ML and statistical methods to analyze maternal health disparities within the United States was conducted. Publications between January 1, 2012, and February 2024 were systematically searched through PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria targeted studies conducted within the U.S., peer-reviewed articles published during the period, research covering the postpartum period up to one year post-delivery, and studies incorporating both maternal and infant health data with a focus primarily on maternal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 147 studies met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Among these, 129 (88 %) utilized statistical methods in health sciences to analyze correlations, treatment effects, and public health initiatives, thus providing vital, actionable insights for policy and clinical decisions. Meanwhile, 18 articles (12 %) applied ML techniques to explore complex, nonlinear relationships in data. The findings indicate that while ML and statistical methods offer valuable insights into the factors contributing to health disparities, there are limitations regarding dataset diversity and methodological precision. Most studies concentrate on racial and socioeconomic inequalities, with fewer addressing the geographical aspects of maternal health. This review emphasizes the necessity for broader dataset utilization and methodology improvements to enhance the findings' predictive accuracy and applicability.

CONCLUSIONS

ML and statistical methods show great potential to transform maternal healthcare by identifying and addressing disparities. Future research should focus on broadening dataset diversity, improving methodological precision, and enhancing interdisciplinary efforts.

Clinician Perspectives on the Assessment and Management of Postpartum Pain

Postpartum pain management practices have significant variation and are known to be influenced by nonclinical factors. We aimed to examine factors that contribute to clinicians' assessment and management of postpartum pain, including the role of opioids.We conducted a qualitative study of obstetric clinicians providing postpartum care at a single, large, tertiary care center (November 2021-June 2022). Attending and trainee OB/GYN physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) completed in-depth interviews using a semistructured interview guide. Purposive sampling was employed to ensure a representative sample of each clinician type was included. Participants were asked about factors that influence postpartum pain management. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.Of 46 participants, 48% were attending physicians, 32% trainee physicians, and 20% APPs. The analysis demonstrated three key themes related to postpartum assessment and management: influencing factors (knowledge or experiences that influence practice), objective findings, and the role of counseling. While clinicians reported guidelines and patient satisfaction as major influencing factors, several also shared the inherent conflict that may arise between them. Objective findings, specifically the impact of pain on patients achieving functional goals, also influenced clinician decision-making. Conversely, many participants reported the limited utility of the numeric pain scale as an objective metric. Additionally, the role of counseling in shared decision-making and providing anticipatory guidance was emphasized. Finally, clinicians had a range of opinions on the role of opioids in pain management, but many spoke to the value of opioids as second-line treatment and the impact of the opioid epidemic on prescribing practices.The factors that influence clinicians' assessment and management of postpartum pain are occasionally in conflict. Furthermore, objective measures, such as the numeric pain scale, have significant limitations. · Guidelines and patient satisfaction influence care.. · Guidelines and patient satisfaction can conflict.. · The numeric pain scale has significant limitations.. · Opioids are valuable as second-line pain treatment..

Racial Disparities in the Adherence to an Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Protocol (ERAC): A Retrospective Observational Study at Two NYC Hospitals, 2016-2020

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs for cesarean deliveries (ERAC) aim to optimize the quality of care for all patients. Race is not routinely monitored in ERAC programs. Given the extensive reports of racial disparities in obstetrical care, the goal of this study was to investigate racial differences in adherence rates to individual ERAC protocol elements.A cohort study was performed among cesarean delivery patients enrolled in an ERAC program at two hospitals from October 2016 to September 2020. Compliance with anesthesia-specific ERAC metrics, including ketorolac, ondansetron, and active warming methods, were compared by race. Race was self-reported by all patients. Logistic regression models stratified by pre- and post-ERAC status were used to assess relationships.The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3,172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). There were no racial differences found in overall ERAC protocol adherence, active warming methods, or ondansetron administration in the pre- and post-ERAC groups. The odds of ketorolac administration in Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.95; p = 0.020) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.98; p = 0.027) pre-ERAC were significantly lower compared with white patients. In the post-ERAC group, this disparity persisted in Black (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-0.99; p = 0.042) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98; p = 0.023).Appropriate implementation and adherence to all elements of the ERAC program may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in outcomes and ensuring equitable treatment for all patients. · No racial differences were found in ondansetron administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · No racial differences were found in active warming methods pre- and post-ERAC.. · Black patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · Asian patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · ERAC metrics must be routinely monitored by race to resolve any observed inequities..

Can theory-driven implementation interventions help clinician champions promote opioid stewardship after childbirth? Protocol for a pragmatic implementation study

Background

Our objective is to determine the effect of a new national clinical practice guideline (CPG) for pain management after childbirth, as implemented with less vs. more intensive implementation support, on postpartum opioid prescribing.

Methods

A quasi-experimental analysis will measure the impact of post-childbirth pain management guidelines on opioid prescribing in a statewide hospital collaborative, overall and among key patient subgroups at risk for inequitable care and outcomes. We will also use a randomized, non-responder design and mixed-methods approaches to evaluate the effects of Replicating Effective Programs (REP), a theory-driven, scalable implementation intervention, and Enhanced REP (E-REP; i.e., REP augmented with facilitation, which is individualized consultation with site champions to overcome local barriers) on the uptake of the CPG. The study will include hospitals within the Obstetrics Initiative (OBI), a perinatal collaborative quality initiative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan that includes 68 member hospitals serving more than 120,000 postpartum people, over approximately 15 months. Hospitals not initially responding to REP-defined by performance <15th percentile of all OBI hospitals for (a) inpatient order for opioid-sparing postpartum pain management (e.g., scheduled acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when not contraindicated), or (b) amount of opioid prescribed at discharge-will be allocated via block randomization to continue REP or to E-REP. Using interrupted time series analyses, the primary analysis will evaluate the rate of postpartum opioid-sparing prescribing metrics at the time of discharge (primary outcome) and opioid prescription refills and high-risk prescribing (secondary outcomes) before and after CPG implementation with REP. We will evaluate inequities in outcomes by patient, procedure, prescriber, and hospital factors. Exploratory analyses will examine temporal trends in patient-reported outcomes and the effects of continued REP vs. E-REP among slower-responder sites. We will evaluate implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, feasibility, costs, needed REP and E-REP adaptations) using clinician and patient surveys and qualitative methods (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06285123).

Discussion

Findings will inform refinements to the REP and E-REP interventions and add to the literature on the effectiveness of facilitation to promote uptake of evidence-based clinical practices in maternity care.

Racism and Inequities in Maternal Health

Racial inequities in maternal care persist despite decades of enhanced focus on understanding why they exist. Anesthesiologists are ideally positioned to influence Black women's and birthing people's care through their near-ubiquitous presence in many labor and delivery environments. Through intentionally addressing drivers of increased maternal morbidity and mortality, such as inequities in labor analgesia and anesthesia and postpartum pain management, anesthesiologists have a powerful role in changing lives.

Labor epidural analgesia among Han and Uyghur parturients: a prospective observational study in China

BACKGROUND

Disparities in pain sensitivity and tolerance have been described, however little is known about variability in the experience of labor pain and childbirth in China.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Xinjiang, China with two major ethnic groups: Han and Uyghur women. Women with a vaginal delivery with labor epidural analgesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was cervical dilation at labor epidural analgesia request, and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine associated variables. Secondary outcomes were pain score at epidural request and epidural analgesics use. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

Cervical dilatation at labor epidural analgesia request was significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; P=0.0095), and pain score (numerical pain scale 0-10) was significantly higher (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; P=0.0002) among Uyghur compared to Han women. In the multivariate model, Uyghur women had a lower cervical dilation (P=0.0392) and a higher pain score (P <0.0001) at epidural request. During the labor process, a larger proportion of Uyghur women used the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump (77.8% vs. 53.6%, P=0.0011). They pressed the pump in a significantly shorter time (61.3 ± 41.2 vs. 104.0 ± 105.2 min, P=0.0015) and for more times (1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, P=0.0022), contributing to significantly more epidural analgesic use (sufentanil: 0.06 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 μg/kg/h, P=0.0150, ropivacaine: 0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg/h, P=0.0003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that Uyghur women experience labor pain with higher levels of pain and with higher use of epidural analgesics than Han women. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these differences are clinically relevant.

Examining Disparities in the Evaluation and Management of Cesarean Birth Pain Among Patients With and Without a Psychiatric Condition

Background Postoperative pain management is an important aspect of postpartum care following cesarean delivery (CD). This study aimed to determine whether differences exist in pain assessments and opioid administration after CD between patients with psychiatric illness and those without. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort study of 490 patients who underwent CD at an urban tertiary care center. Demographic and delivery data were collected by chart review. The primary outcomes were the number of pain assessments performed, average pain score, and amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered to patients with and without psychiatric illness. Results A total of 389 patients without a psychiatric diagnosis were compared to 101 patients with a psychiatric diagnosis. After adjusting for baseline characteristics in all models, psychiatric history had a significant effect on pain severity (β = 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.00, 0.49); p = 0.046) and number of pain assessments (β = -2.41; 95% CI (-4.42, -0.41); p = 0.018), but not on MME administration (incidence rate ratio = 1.31; 95% CI (0.60, 2.92); p = 0.466). Patients with a psychiatric history reported more severe pain after CD and received fewer pain assessments. There was no significant difference in the amount of pain medication administered between groups. Conclusions In this study, patients with a psychiatric diagnosis received fewer pain assessments and reported more severe post-CD pain compared to those without. Despite this difference, both groups received similar amounts of pain medication, raising concern for bias and inadequate treatment of pain in patients with a psychiatric diagnosis.

Development of an implementation intervention to promote adoption of the COMFORT clinical practice guideline for peripartum pain management: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Pain management after childbirth is widely variable, increasing risk of untreated pain, opioid harms, and inequitable experiences of care. The Creating Optimal Pain Management FOR Tailoring Care (COMFORT) clinical practice guideline (CPG) seeks to promote evidence-based, equitable acute peripartum pain management in the United States. We aimed to identify contextual conditions (i.e., barriers and facilitators) and discrete implementation strategies (i.e., theory-based actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) likely to influence COMFORT CPG uptake and specify corresponding multi-component implementation interventions at the perinatal quality collaborative- and unit-level.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study involving virtual individual interviews and focus groups. Interviews included individuals undergoing childbirth from 2018-2023, (recruited through two online registries), and actively practicing maternity clinicians and surgeons, (recruited via snowball sampling with the eDelphi panel creating the COMFORT CPG), caring for pregnant people in the United States. Focus groups included physicians, midwives, nurses, and unit-based quality improvement (QI) staff working at Michigan hospitals within the Obstetrics Initiative, a statewide perinatal quality collaborative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and Replicating Effective Programs framework informed data collection and analysis. Qualitative content analysis characterized influential contextual conditions, which were linked to implementation strategies and tools using principles of implementation mapping. We then specified multi-component implementation interventions for use by quality collaboratives and unit-based teams.

RESULTS

From May-September 2023, we completed 57 semi-structured individual interviews (31 patients, 26 clinicians) and six focus groups (44 QI champions). Participants identified 10 key conditions influential for COMFORT CPG adoption. Findings enabled identification of five collaborative-level implementation strategies, 27 unit-level implementation strategies, and 12 associated tools to promote COMFORT CPG adoption including the specification of each strategy's hypothesized mechanism of action and each tool's goal and potential uses.

CONCLUSIONS

This work identifies contextual conditions and implementation strategies and tools at the perinatal quality collaborative and unit levels to promote COMFORT CPG adoption on maternity units. These findings may foster more rapid CPG implementation and thereby promote more equitable and evidence-based perinatal pain management care.

Differences in Acute Postoperative Opioid Use by English Proficiency, Race, and Ethnicity After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in documenting disparities in pain management for racial and ethnic minorities and patients with language barriers. Previous studies have found differential prescription patterns of opioids for racial and ethnic minority group and patients having limited English proficiency (LEP) after arthroplasty. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding how the intersection of these sociodemographic factors is associated with immediate postoperative pain management. This study aimed to explore language and racial-ethnic disparities in short-term opioid utilization after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty from 2015 to 2019 at an urban medical center. The primary predictor variables included LEP status and racial-ethnic category, and the primary outcome variables were oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) during 2 distinct postoperative periods: the first 12 hours after surgery and from the end of surgery to the end of postoperative day (POD) 1. Patient characteristics and perioperative metrics were described by language status, race, and ethnicity using nonparametric tests, as appropriate. We performed an adjusted generalized estimating equation to assess the total effect of the intersection of LEP and racial-ethnic categories on short-term postoperative opioid use in mean ratios (MRs).

RESULTS

This study included a total of 4090 observations, in which 7.9% (323) patients had LEP. Patients reported various racial-ethnic categories, with 72.7% (2975) non-Hispanic White, and minority groups including non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander (AAPI), Hispanic/Latinx, non-Hispanic Black/African American, and Others. Patients self-identifying as non-Hispanic AAPI received fewer OME regardless of LEP status during the first 12 hours postoperatively (MR for English proficient [EP], 0.12 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.08-0.18]; MR for LEP, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.13-0.37]) and from end of surgery to the end of POD 1 (MR for EP, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.16-0.37]; MR for LEP, 0.42, [95% CI, 0.24-0.73]) than EP non-Hispanic White. Hispanic/Latinx patients with LEP received lower amounts of OME during the first postoperative 12 hours (MR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17-0.53) and from end of surgery to the end of POD 1 (MR, 0.42; 95% CI 0.23-0.79) than EP non-Hispanic White. Furthermore, within the non-Hispanic White group, those with LEP received fewer OME within the first 12 hours (MR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified an association between LEP, racial-ethnic identity, and short-term postoperative OME utilization after total knee and hip arthroplasty. The observed differences in opioid utilization imply there may be language and racial-ethnic disparities in acute pain management and perioperative care.

Integrative Review of Opioid Use and Protocol Adherence in Hospitals After Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols used and amount of opioids administered during hospitalization for cesarean birth after the ERAS protocols were implemented.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and PubMed for sources published in English between January 2018 and December 2023. Search terms were cesarean AND opioid∗ AND eras OR erac OR enhanced recovery.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies were conducted in the United States, used key pain management components from the ERAS guidelines, and reported results for in-patient postsurgical opioid use.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data obtained were for post-ERAS implementation only and included authors, date, sample size, study location, participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods, interventions used (ERAS guideline components), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during the hospital stay.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Weighted averages were calculated for results reported as means and percentages. Descriptive summaries were used for the remainder of the results.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were found, accounting for 19,961 individuals' post-ERAS experiences. Although 30% of participants experienced a scheduled cesarean birth, 70% experienced all types of cesarean births, including scheduled, urgent, or emergent. There was substantial heterogeneity of the data reported, especially for how opioid use was measured and analyzed and time frames for opioid use. In 11 studies that reported MME as means, the weighted average for in-patient opioid use was 54 MME per stay. In only 17 studies, researchers reported the number of women who experienced an opioid-free recovery, which averaged 40% of the women.

CONCLUSION

While implementation of key components of the ERAS protocol is associated with reduced opioid exposure for women experiencing scheduled and nonscheduled cesarean births, a benchmark for the amount of in-patient opioid use was not established. Still, this review offers evidence regarding best practices, lessons learned, and outcome analysis strategies. These findings can support perinatal teams who are considering implementing ERAS for cesarean birth, or those looking for further improvements.

Racial Disparities in Opioid Prescribing in the United States from 2011 to 2021: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This meta-analysis is an update to a seminal meta-analysis on racial/ethnic disparities in pain treatment in the United States (US) published in 2012. Since then, literature has accumulated on the topic and important policy changes were made.

Objective

Examining racial/ethnic disparities in pain management and investigating key moderators of the association between race/ethnicity and pain outcomes in the US.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of publications (between January 2011 and February 2021) from the Scopus database. Search terms included: race, racial, racialized, ethnic, ethnicity, minority, minorities, minoritized, pain treatment, pain management, and analgesia. All studies were observational, examining differences in receipt of pain prescription medication in various settings, across racial or ethnic categories in US adult patient populations. Two binary analgesic outcomes were extracted: 1) prescription of "any" analgesia, and 2) prescription of "opioid" analgesia. We analyzed these outcomes in two populations: 1) Black patients, with White patients as a reference; and 2) Hispanic patients, with non-Hispanic White patients as a reference.

Results

The meta-analysis included twelve studies, and the systematic review included forty-three studies. Meta-analysis showed that, compared to White patients, Black patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia (OR 0.83, 95% CI [0.73-0.94]). Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, Hispanic patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia (OR 0.80, 95% CI [0.72-0.88]).

Conclusion

Despite a decade's gap, the findings indicate persistent disparities in prescription of, and access to opioid analgesics for pain among Black and Hispanic populations in the US.

Listening to Black Women's Perspectives of Birth Centers and Midwifery Care: Advocacy, Protection, and Empowerment

INTRODUCTION

Black women in Texas experience high rates of adverse maternal outcomes that have been linked to health inequities and structural racism in the maternal care system. Birth centers and midwifery care are highlighted in the literature as contributing to improved perinatal care experiences and decreased adverse outcomes for Black women. However, compared with White women, Black women underuse birth centers and midwifery care. Black women's perceptions in Texas of birth center and midwifery care are underrepresented in research. Thus, this study aimed to highlight the views of Black women residing in Texas on birth centers and midwifery care to identify their needs and explore ways to increasing access to perinatal care.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 pregnant and postpartum Black women residing in Texas. Questions focused on the women's access, knowledge, and use of birth centers and midwifery care in the context of their lived maternal care experiences. Interview transcripts were reviewed and analyzed using inductive, qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The Black women interviewed all shared experiences of discrimination and bias while receiving obstetric care that affected their interest in and overall perceptions of birth center and midwifery care. Participants also discussed financial and institutional barriers that impacted their ease of access to birth center and midwifery care services. Additionally, participants highlighted the need for culturally sensitive and respectful perinatal health care.

DISCUSSION

The Black women interviewed in this study emphasized the prevalence of racism and discrimination in perinatal health care encounters, a reflection consistent with current literature. Black women also expressed a desire to use birth centers and midwifery care but identified the barriers in Texas that impede access. Study findings highlight the need to address barriers to promote equitable perinatal health care access for Black women.

Drivers of variation in postpartum opioid prescribing across hospitals participating in a statewide maternity care quality collaborative

BACKGROUND

We describe variation in postpartum opioid prescribing across a statewide quality collaborative and assess the proportion due to practitioner and hospital characteristics.

METHODS

We assessed postpartum prescribing data from nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex births between January 2020 and June 2021 included in the clinical registry of a statewide obstetric quality collaborative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Mixed effect logistic regression and linear models adjusted for patient characteristics and assessed practitioner- and hospital-level predictors of receiving a postpartum opioid prescription and prescription size. Relative contributions of practitioner and hospital characteristics were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Of 40,589 patients birthing at 68 hospitals, 3.0% (872/29,412) received an opioid prescription after vaginal birth and 87.8% (9812/11,177) received one after cesarean birth, with high variation across hospitals. In adjusted models, the strongest patient-level predictors of receiving a prescription were cesarean birth (aOR 899.1, 95% CI 752.8-1066.7) and third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (aOR 25.7, 95% CI 17.4-37.9). Receiving care from a certified nurse-midwife (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.82) or family medicine physician (aOR 0.60, 95%CI 0.39-0.91) was associated with lower prescribing rates. Hospital-level predictors included receiving care at hospitals with <500 annual births (aOR 4.07, 95% CI 1.61-15.0). A positive safety culture was associated with lower prescribing rates (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.88). Much of the variation in postpartum prescribing was attributable to practitioners and hospitals (prescription receipt: practitioners 25.1%, hospitals 12.1%; prescription size: practitioners 5.4%, hospitals: 52.2%).

DISCUSSION

Variation in postpartum opioid prescribing after birth is high and driven largely by practitioner- and hospital-level factors. Opioid stewardship efforts targeted at both the practitioner and hospital level may be effective for reducing opioid prescribing harms.

Racial and Ethnic Patient Care Disparities in Anesthesiology: History, Current State, and a Way Forward

Disparities in patient care and outcomes are well-documented in medicine but have received comparatively less attention in anesthesiology. Those disparities linked to racial and ethnic identity are pervasive, with compelling evidence in operative anesthesiology, obstetric anesthesiology, pain medicine, and critical care. This narrative review presents an overview of disparities in perioperative patient care that is grounded in historical context followed by potential solutions for mitigating disparities and inequities.

Optimizing Opioid Prescription Quantity After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To test whether an individualized opioid-prescription protocol (IOPP) with a shared decision-making component can be used without compromising postcesarean pain management.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we compared IOPP with shared decision making with a fixed quantity of opioid tablets at hospital discharge. We recruited at 31 centers participating in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Study participants had uncomplicated cesarean births. Follow-up occurred through 12 weeks postdischarge. Individuals with complicated cesarean births or history of opioid use in the pregnancy were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to IOPP with shared decision making or fixed quantity (20 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone). In the IOPP group, we calculated recommended tablet quantity based on opioid use in the 24 hours before discharge. After an educational module and shared decision making, participants selected a quantity of discharge tablets (up to 20). The primary outcome was moderate to severe pain (score 4 or higher [possible range 0-10]) on the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) at 1 week after discharge. A total sample size of 5,500 participants was planned to assess whether IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to the fixed quantity of 20 tablets.

RESULTS

From September 2020 to March 2022, 18,990 individuals were screened and 5,521 were enrolled (n=2,748 IOPP group, n=2,773 fixed-quantity group). For the primary outcome, IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to fixed quantity (59.5% vs 60.1%, risk difference 0.67%; 95% CI, -2.03% to 3.37%, noninferiority margin -5.0) and resulted in significantly fewer tablets received (median 14 [interquartile range 4-20] vs 20, P <.001) through 90 days postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Compared with fixed quantity, IOPP with shared decision making was noninferior for outpatient postcesarean analgesia at 1 week postdischarge and resulted in fewer prescribed opioid tablets at discharge.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04296396.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Peripartum Pain Assessment and Management

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine if there were racial/ethnic disparities in pain assessment and management from labor throughout the postpartum period.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all births from January 2019 to December 2021 in a single urban, quaternary care hospital, excluding patients with hysterectomy, ICU stay, transfusion of more than 3 units of packed red blood cells, general anesthesia, or evidence of a substance abuse disorder. We characterized and compared patterns of antepartum and postpartum pain assessments, epidural use, pain scores, and postpartum pain management by racial/ethnic group with bivariable analyses. Multivariable regression was performed to test for an association between race/ethnicity and amount of opioid pain medication in milligram equivalent units, stratified by delivery mode.

RESULTS

There were 18,085 births between 2019 and 2021 with available race/ethnicity data. Of these, 58.3% were white, 15.0% were Hispanic, 11.9% were Asian, 7.4% were Black, and the remaining 7.4% were classified as Other/Declined. There were no significant differences by race/ethnicity in the number of antepartum or postpartum pain assessments or the proportion of patients who received epidural analgesia. Black and Hispanic patients reported the highest maximum postpartum pain scores after vaginal and cesarean birth compared to white and Asian patients. However, Black and Hispanic patients received lower daily doses of opioid medications than white patients, regardless of delivery mode. After adjusting for patient factors and non-opioid medication dosages, all other racial/ethnic groups received less opioid medication than white patients.

CONCLUSION

Inequities were found in postpartum pain treatment, including among patients reporting the highest pain levels.

Multiple marginalized identities: A qualitative exploration of intersectional perinatal experiences of birthing people of color with substance use disorder in Massachusetts

INTRODUCTION

Racial and ethnic inequities persist in receipt of prenatal care, mental health services, and addiction treatment for pregnant and postpartum individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). Further qualitative work is needed to understand the intersectionality of racial and ethnic discrimination, stigma related to substance use, and gender bias on perinatal SUD care from the perspectives of affected individuals.

METHODS

Peer interviewers conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with recently pregnant people of color with SUD in Massachusetts to explore the impact of internalized, interpersonal, and structural racism on prenatal, birthing, and postpartum experiences. The study used a thematic analysis to generate the codebook and double coded transcripts, with an overall kappa coefficient of 0.89. Preliminary themes were triangulated with five participants to inform final theme development.

RESULTS

The study includes 23 participants of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds: 39% mixed race/ethnicity (including 9% with Native American ancestry), 30% Hispanic or Latinx, 26% Black/African American, 4% Asian. While participants frequently names racial and ethnic discrimination, both interpersonal and structural, as barriers to care, some participants attributed poor experiences to other marginalized identities and experiences, such as having a SUD. Three unique themes emerged from the participants' experiences: 1) Participants of color faced increased scrutiny and mistrust from clinicians and treatment programs; 2) Greater self-advocacy was required from individuals of color to counteract stereotypes and stigma; 3) Experiences related to SUD history and pregnancy status intersected with racism and gender bias to create distinct forms of discrimination.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant and postpartum people of color affected by perinatal SUD faced pervasive mistrust and unequal standards of care from mostly white healthcare staff and treatment spaces, which negatively impacted their treatment access, addiction medication receipt, postpartum pain management, and ability to retain custody of their children. Key clinical interventions and policy changes identified by participants for antiracist action include personalizing anesthetic plans for adequate peripartum pain control, minimizing reproductive injustices in contraceptive counseling, and addressing misuse of toxicology testing to mitigate inequitable Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement and custody loss.

Ethnicity, socio-economic deprivation and postpartum outcomes following caesarean delivery: a multicentre cohort study

Disparities relating to postpartum recovery outcomes in different socio-economic and racial ethnic groups are underexplored. We conducted a planned analysis of a large prospective caesarean delivery cohort to explore the relationship between ethnicity, socio-economic status and postpartum recovery. Eligible patients were enrolled and baseline demographic, obstetric and medical history data were collected 18 h and 30 h following delivery. Patients completed postpartum quality of life and recovery measures in person on day 1 (EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L, including global health visual analogue scale; Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score; and pain scores) and by telephone between day 28 and day 32 postpartum (EQ-5D-5L and pain scores). Socio-economic group was determined according to the Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile of each patient's usual place of residence. Data from 1000 patients who underwent caesarean delivery were included. There were more patients of Asian, Black and mixed ethnicity in the more deprived quintiles. Patients of White ethnicities had shorter postpartum duration of hospital stay compared with patients of Asian and Black ethnicities (35 (28-56 [18-513]) h vs. 44 (31-71 [19-465]) h vs. 49 (33-75 [23-189]) h, respectively. In adjusted models at day 30, patients of Asian ethnicity had a significantly greater risk of moderate to severe pain (numerical rating scale ≥ 4) at rest and on movement (odds ratio (95%CI) 2.42 (1.24-4.74) and 2.32 (1.40-3.87)), respectively). There were no differences in readmission rates or incidence of complications between groups. Patients from White ethnic backgrounds experience shorter postpartum duration of stay compared with patients from Asian and Black ethnic groups. Ethnic background impacts pain scores and recovery at day 1 postpartum and following hospital discharge, even after adjusting for socio-economic group. Further work is required to understand the underlying factors driving differences in pain and recovery and to develop strategies to reduce disparities in obstetric patients.

Lessons from Mortality Reviews: Nonbiologic Contributors to Maternal Deaths

Based on years of review and analysis of severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality cases, it is clear that the high rates of maternal mortality in this country are due to more than obstetrical emergencies gone awry. Many nonmedical factors contribute to these poor outcomes including complex and ineffectual health care systems, poor coordination of care, and structural racism. In this article we discuss what physicians can and cannot accomplish on their own, the role of race and racism, and barriers built into the manner in which health care is delivered. We conclude that while obstetricians must continue to focus on the area where their expertise lies, reducing deaths by educating and training physicians to deal with the downstream consequences of upstream events, they must also focus increased attention on educating themselves and their trainees about the effect of racism, social disadvantage, and poor coordination of care on health, as well as their role in resolving these issues. Physicians must also reach out to their representatives in government to partner with them. Those leaders must recognize that when they hear about disparities in maternal mortality, focusing only on events in hospitals ignores the more dispositive issues that put Black women at risk in the first instance. KEY POINTS: · Structural racism contributes to maternal deaths.. · Coordination of postpartum care is critically important.. · U.S. health care system is complex and not patient friendly..

Reducing inpatient opioid consumption after caesarean delivery: effects of an opioid stewardship programme and racial impact in a community hospital

Caesarean section is the most common inpatient surgery in the USA, with more than 1.1 million procedures in 2020. Similar to other surgical procedures, healthcare providers rely on opioids for postoperative pain management. However, current evidence shows that postpartum patients usually experience less pain due to pregnancy-related physiological changes. Owing to the current opioid crisis, public health agencies urge providers to provide rational opioid prescriptions. In addition, a personalised postoperative opioid prescription may benefit racial minorities since research shows that this population receives fewer opioids despite greater pain levels. Our project aimed to reduce inpatient opioid consumption after caesarean delivery within 6 months of the implementation of an opioid stewardship programme.A retrospective analysis of inpatient opioid consumption after caesarean delivery was conducted to determine the baseline, design the opioid stewardship programme and set goals. The plan-do-study-act method was used to implement the programme, and the results were analysed using a controlled interrupted time-series method.After implementing the opioid stewardship programme, we observed an average of 80% reduction (ratio of geometric means 0.2; 95% CI 0.2 to 0.3; p<0.001) in inpatient opioid consumption. The institution designated as control did not experience relevant changes in inpatient opioid prescriptions during the study period. In addition, the hospital where the programme was implemented was unable to reduce the difference in inpatient opioid demand between African Americans and Caucasians.Our project showed that an opioid stewardship programme for patients undergoing caesarean delivery can effectively reduce inpatient opioid use. PDSA, as a quality improvement method, is essential to address the problem, measure the results and adjust the programme to achieve goals.

Structural Racism and Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia Among Non-Hispanic Black Birthing People

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between structural racism and labor neuraxial analgesia use.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed 2017 U.S. natality data for non-Hispanic Black and White birthing people. The exposure was a multidimensional structural racism index measured in the county of the delivery hospital. It was calculated as the mean of three Black-White inequity ratios (ratios for lower education, unemployment, and incarceration in jails) and categorized into terciles, with the third tercile corresponding to high structural racism. The outcome was the labor neuraxial analgesia rate. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs of neuraxial analgesia associated with terciles of the index were estimated with multivariate logistic regression models. Black and White people were compared with the use of an interaction term between race and ethnicity and the racism index.

RESULTS

Of the 1,740,716 birth certificates analyzed, 396,303 (22.8%) were for Black people. The labor neuraxial analgesia rate was 77.2% for Black people in the first tercile of the racism index, 74.7% in the second tercile, and 72.4% in the third tercile. For White people, the rates were 80.4%, 78.2%, and 78.2%, respectively. For Black people, compared with the first tercile of the racism index, the second tercile was associated with 18.4% (95% CI, 16.9-19.9%) decreased adjusted odds of receiving neuraxial analgesia and the third tercile with 28.3% (95% CI, 26.9-29.6%) decreased adjusted odds. For White people, the decreases were 13.4% (95% CI, 12.5-14.4%) in the second tercile and 15.6% (95% CI, 14.7-16.5%) in the third tercile. A significant difference in the odds of neuraxial analgesia was observed between Black and White people for the second and third terciles.

CONCLUSION

A multidimensional index of structural racism is associated with significantly reduced odds of receiving labor neuraxial analgesia among Black people and, to a lesser extent, White people.

Experiences of postpartum anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study and demographic analysis

INTRODUCTION

The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic saw the reconfiguration of perinatal and maternity services, national lockdowns, and social distancing measures which affected the perinatal experiences of new and expectant parents. This study aimed to explore the occurrence of postpartum anxieties in people who gave birth during the pandemic.

METHODS

An exploratory concurrent mixed-methods design was chosen to collect and analyse the quantitative and qualitative data of an online survey during the first UK lockdown. The survey included the Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale-Research Short Form-for use in global Crises [PSAS-RSF-C] psychometric tool, and open-ended questions in relation to changes in birth plans and feelings about those changes and giving birth in a pandemic. Differences in measured scores were analysed for the participant's ethnicity, sexual orientation and disability using independent Student's t-tests, and for age, the analysis was completed using Pearson's correlation. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed using a template analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,754 new and expectant parents completed the survey between 10th and 24th April 2020, and 381 eligible postnatal women completed the psychometric test. We found 52.5% of participants reported symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of postnatal anxiety-significantly higher than the rates usually reported. Younger women and sexual minority women were more likely to score highly on the PSAS-RSF-C than their older or heterosexual counterparts (p<0.001). Younger participants reported anxieties in the 'infant safety and welfare' category, whilst lesbian, gay, bisexual, and pansexual participants scored highly in the 'psychosocial adjustment to motherhood' category.

DISCUSSION

Postpartum anxiety is under-reported, and demographic differences in the rates of postpartum anxiety are under-researched. This research demonstrates for the first time a difference in postpartum anxiety rates amongst sexual minority women.

Black Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States

The maternal mortality rate for non-Hispanic Black birthing people is 69.9 deaths per 100,000 live births compared with 26.6 deaths per 100,000 live births for non-Hispanic White birthing people. Black pregnancy-related mortality has been underrepresented in research and the media; however, there is growing literature on the role of racism in health disparities. Those who provide care to Black patients should increase their understanding of racism's impact and take steps to center the experiences and needs of Black birthing people.

A Prospective Longitudinal Quality Initiative toward Improved Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathways

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) pathways reduces inpatient and outpatient opioid use, pain scores and improves the indicators of postoperative recovery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, longitudinal, quality improvement study of all patients older than 18 undergoing an uncomplicated cesarean delivery (CD) at an academic medical center. We excluded complicated CD, patients with chronic pain disorders, chronic opioid use, acute postpartum depression, or mothers whose neonate demised before their discharge. Lastly, we excluded non-English- and non-Spanish-speaking patients. Our study compared patient outcomes before (pre-ERAC) and after (post-ERAC) implementation of ERAC pathways. Primary outcomes were inpatient morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use and the patient's delta pain scores. Secondary outcomes were outpatient MME prescriptions and indicators of postoperative recovery (time to feeding, ambulation, and hospital discharge).

RESULTS

Of 308 patients undergoing CD from October 2019 to September 2020, 196 were enrolled in the pre-ERAC cohort and 112 in the post-ERAC cohort. Patients in the pre-ERAC cohort were more likely to require opioids in the postoperative period compared with the post-ERAC cohort (81.6 vs. 64.3%, p < 0.001). Likewise, there was a higher use of MME per stay in the pre-ERAC cohort (30 [20-49] vs. 16.8 MME [11.2-33.9], p < 0.001). There was also a higher number of patients who required prescribed opioids at the time of discharge (98 vs. 86.6%, p < 0.001) as well as in the amount of MMEs prescribed (150 [150-225] vs. 150 MME [112-150], p < 0.001; different shape of distribution). Furthermore, the patients in the pre-ERAC cohort had higher delta pain scores (3.3 [2.3-4.7] vs. 2.2 [1.3-3.7], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study has illustrated that our ERAC pathways were associated with reduced inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid use, patient-reported pain scores, and improved indicators of postoperative recovery.

KEY POINTS

· Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with a higher percentage of no postpartum opioid use.. · Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with lower delta (reported - expected) pain scores.. · The results of ERAC pathways implementation are increased by adopting a patient-centered approach..

Investigating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Care at the System Level Using Patient Safety Incident Reports

BACKGROUND

Maternal mortality in the United States is high, and women and birthing people of color experience higher rates of mortality and severe maternal morbidity (SMM). More than half of maternal deaths and cases of SMM are considered preventable. The research presented here investigated systems issues contributing to adverse outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities in maternal care using patient safety incident reports.

METHODS

The authors reviewed incidents reported in the labor and delivery unit (L&D) and the antepartum and postpartum unit (A&P) of a large academic hospital in 2019 and 2020. Deliveries associated with a reported incident were described by race/ethnicity, age group, method of delivery, and several other process variables. Differences across racial/ethnic group were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

Almost two thirds (64.8%) of the 528 reports analyzed were reported in L&D, and 35.2% were reported in A&P. Non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients accounted for 43.9% of reported incidents, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients accounted for 43.2%, Hispanic patients accounted for 8.9%, and patients categorized as "other" accounted for 4.0%. NHB patients were disproportionally represented in the incident reports, as they accounted for only 36.5% of the underlying birthing population. The odds ratio (OR) demonstrated a higher risk of a reported adverse incident for NHB patients; however, adjustment for cesarean section attenuated the association (OR 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.54).

CONCLUSION

Greater integration of patient safety and health equity efforts in hospitals are needed to promptly identify and alleviate racial and ethnic disparities in maternal health outcomes. Although additional systems analysis is necessary, the authors offer recommendations to support safer, more equitable maternal care.

Understanding the Postpartum Cesarean Pain Experience Among Individuals With Publicly Funded Insurance: A Qualitative Investigation

INTRODUCTION

Pain is the most common postpartum concern and has been associated with adverse outcomes, such as difficulty with neonatal bonding, postpartum depression, and persistent pain. Furthermore, racial and ethnic disparities in the management of postpartum pain are well described. Despite this, less is known regarding patients' lived experiences regrading postpartum pain. The purpose of this study was to assess patient experiences related to postpartum pain management after cesarean birth.

METHODS

This is a prospective qualitative study of patients' experiences with postpartum pain management after cesarean birth at a single large tertiary care center. Individuals were eligible if they had publicly funded prenatal care, were English or Spanish speaking, and underwent a cesarean birth. Purposive sampling was used to ensure a racially and ethnically diverse cohort. Participants underwent in-depth interviews using a semistructured interview guide at 2 time points: postpartum day 2 to 3 and 2 to 4 weeks after discharge. Interviews addressed perceptions and experiences of postpartum pain management and recovery. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Of 49 participants, 40.8% identified as non-Hispanic Black and 40.8% as Hispanic. The majority (59.2%) had experienced a cesarean birth with a prior pregnancy. Thematic analysis yielded 2 overarching domains: (1) experience of pain after cesarean birth and (2) pain management and opioid use after cesarean birth. Themes related to the experience of pain included pain as a meaningful experience, pain not aligned with expectations, and limitations caused by pain. All participants discussed limitations caused by their pain, voicing frustration with pursuing activities of daily living, caring for home and family, caring for neonate, and impact on mood. Themes related to pain management and opioid use addressed a desire for nonpharmacologic pain management, positive and negative experiences using opioids, and hesitancy and perceived judgement regarding opioid use. Several participants described experiences of judgement regarding the request for opioids and needing stronger pain medications, such as oxycodone.

DISCUSSION

Understanding experiences regarding postpartum cesarean pain management and recovery is essential to improving patient-centered care. The experiences identified by this analysis highlight the need for individualized postpartum pain management, improved expectation counseling, and the expansion of multimodal pain management options.

Integrative Review of Black Birthing People's Interactions With Clinicians During the Perinatal Period

Maternal morbidity and mortality disproportionately affect Black birthing people. Multiple factors contribute to these disparities, including variations in quality health care, structural racism, and implicit bias. Interactions between Black patients and perinatal clinicians could further affect perinatal care use and subsequent perinatal outcomes. This integrative review aims to synthesize quantitative and qualitative literature published in peer-reviewed journals in English within the past 10 years that address patient-clinician interactions during the perinatal period for Black birthing people in the United States. A systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Embase recovered 24 articles that met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. The following themes emerged from synthesizing Black patients' interactions with perinatal clinicians: Care Quality, Communication, Power Dynamic, and Established Relationships. Mutual respect, effective communication, and shared decision-making may be key modifiable factors to address through clinician education to improve perinatal care for many Black persons.

Racial disparities in pain management: Historical maleficence and solutions for equity

ABSTRACT

Medical journals from the 1800s described differences in disease susceptibility, skin thickness, and pain tolerance among races. These misconceptions about biologic differences, the historical exploitation of minorities in research, and implicit biases among healthcare workers have all affected patient care. Discrepancies still exist in pain assessment and management for minority patients compared with their White counterparts and lead to poor health outcomes. By implementing specific changes in policy and practice, including standardization, implicit bias training, and building a diverse workforce, clinicians can begin to provide care that more equitably manages pain for all patients, regardless of race.

Standardized Order Sets Do Not Eliminate Racial or Ethnic Inequities in Postpartum Pain Management

Objective

To quantify the extent to which a standardized pain management order set reduced racial and ethnic inequities in post-cesarean pain evaluation and management.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to quantify racial and ethnic differences in pain evaluation and management before (July 2014-June 2016) and after implementation of a standardized post-cesarean order set (March 2017-February 2018). Electronic medical records were queried for pain scores >7/10, number of pain assessments, and opioid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen doses. Outcomes were grouped into 0 to <24 and 24-48 h postpartum, and stratified by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [NHB], non-Hispanic White [NHW], Asian, and other), as documented in the electronic health record. Analyses included logistic regression for the categorical outcome of pain score >7 (severe pain), and linear regression, with propensity score adjustment. Main effect and interaction terms were used to calculate the difference-in-difference in pain process and outcome measures between the baseline and follow-up periods.

Results

After order set implementation (N=888), severe pain remained more common among NHB patients (% pain scores >7 NHW vs. NHB 0 to <24 h: 22% vs. 33%, p=0.003; 24-48 h: 26% vs. 40%, p<0.001). Among all patients, pain management processes changed after implementation of the order set, with overall fewer assessments, less Opioids, and more nonopioid analgesics. However, racial and ethnic inequities in a number of assessments and in treatment were unchanged (all p for interaction >0.05), with the exception of a modest increase in NSAID doses 24-48 h postpartum for Hispanic patients.

Conclusion

A standardized pain management order set reduced overall postpartum opioid use, but did not reduce racial and ethnic disparities in pain evaluation and management. Future work should investigate racial equity-focused education and interventions designed to eliminate disparities in pain management.

The evaluation of the efficacy of etofenamate spray in postoperative cesarean pain: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

It was aimed to investigate the effect of etofenamate spray to be applied around the postoperative incision on pain control in cesarean section in this trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. 187 patients (93 cases and 94 controls) were recruited for the study. In the trial group, we applied the etofenamate spray (Doline® 50 ml) after closing the cesarean skin incision and go on four times a day on the skin incision for 24 h. In the control group, we applied a placebo. All patients received paracetamol IV (Paracerol®) as standard analgesic doses. If analgesia was insufficient, tramadol (Contramal®) 50 mg IV doses were added and recorded. A visually analog pain scale (VAS) was performed on both groups at 6-12-18-24th hours. Independent t-tests were performed for data showing normal distributions.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the mean of differences VAS scores between the two groups at 6-12, and 6-18 h. However, a significant difference was obtained in the mean of differences VAS score at the 6-24th hour (p < 0.05). When the groups were compared in terms of additional paracetamol need, a significant difference was found again (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tramadol need.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative administration of etofenamate spray provided an analgesic effect at 24 h and additional analgesic usage decreased. Postoperative analgesia can also be used by administering NSAIDs around the cesarean section incision. In this way, the side effects of other systemic analgesics are avoided.

CLINICAL TRIAL ID

PACTR201811864509898. CLINICAL TRIAL WEB LINK: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=5745.

Cultural Framing and the Impact On Acute Pain and Pain Services

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optimal treatment requires a thorough understanding of all factors contributing to pain in the individual patient. In this review, we investigate the influence of cultural frameworks on pain experience and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The loosely defined concept of culture in pain management integrates a predisposing set of diverse biological, psychological and social characteristics shared within a group. Cultural and ethnic background strongly influence the perception, manifestation, and management of pain. In addition, cultural, racial and ethnic differences continue to play a major role in the disparate treatment of acute pain. A holistic and culturally sensitive approach is likely to improve pain management outcomes, will better cover the needs of diverse patient populations and help reduce stigma and health disparities. Mainstays include awareness, self-awareness, appropriate communication, and training.

Investigating disparities in compliance of nursing pain reassessment for obstetrics and gynecology patients

BACKGROUND

Racial and socioeconomic disparities, exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic and surrounding socio-political polarization, affect access to, delivery of, and patient perception of healthcare. Perioperatively, the bedside nurse carries the greatest responsibility of direct care, which includes pain reassessment, a metric tracked for compliance.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to critically assess disparities in obstetrics and gynecology perioperative care and how these have changed since March 2020 using nursing pain reassessment compliance within a quality improvement framework.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort of 76,984 pain reassessment encounters from 10,774 obstetrics and gynecology patients at a large, academic hospital from September 2017 to March 2021 was obtained from Tableau: Quality, Safety and Risk Prevention platform. Noncompliance proportions were analyzed by patient race across service lines; a sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients who were of neither Black nor White race. Secondary outcomes included analysis by patient ethnicity, body mass index, age, language, procedure, and insurance. Additional analyses were performed by temporally stratifying patients into pre- and post-March 2020 cohorts to investigate potential pandemic and sociopolitical effects on healthcare disparities. Continuous variables were assessed with Wilcoxon rank test, categorical variables were assessed with chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed (P<.05).

RESULTS

Noncompliance proportions of pain reassessment did not differ significantly between Black and White patients as an aggregate of all obstetrics and gynecology patients (8.1% vs 8.2%), but greater differences were found within the divisions of Benign Subspecialty Gynecologic Surgery (Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery + Urogynecology) (14.9% vs 10.70%; P=.03) and Maternal Fetal Medicine (9.5% vs 8.3%; P=.04). Black patients admitted to Gynecologic Oncology experienced lower noncompliance proportions than White patients (5.6% vs 10.4%; P<.01). These differences persisted after adjustment for body mass index, age, insurance, timeline, procedure type, and number of nurses attending to each patient with multivariable analyses. Noncompliance proportions were higher for patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 within Benign Subspecialty Gynecology (17.9% vs 10.4%; P<.01). Non-Hispanic/Latino patients (P=.03), those ≥65 years (P<.01), those with Medicare (P<.01), and those who underwent hysterectomy (P<.01) also experienced greater noncompliance proportions. Aggregate noncompliance proportions differed slightly pre- and post-March 2020; this trend was seen across all service lines except Midwifery and was significant for Benign Subspecialty Gynecology after multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.93; P=.04). Though increases in noncompliance proportions were seen for non-White patients after March 2020, this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Significant race, ethnicity, age, procedure, and body mass index-based disparities were identified in the delivery of perioperative bedside care, especially for those admitted to Benign Subspecialty Gynecologic Services. Conversely, Black patients admitted to Gynecologic Oncology experienced lower levels of nursing noncompliance. This may be in part be related to the actions of a Gynecologic Oncology nurse practioner at our institution who helps coordinate care for the division's postoperative patients. Noncompliance proportions increased after March 2020 within Benign Subspecialty Gynecologic Services. Although this study was not designed to establish causation, possible contributing factors include implicit or explicit biases regarding pain experience across race, body mass index, age, or surgical indication, discrepancies in pain management across hospital units, and downstream effects of healthcare worker burnout, understaffing, increased use of travelers, or sociopolitical polarization since March 2020. This study demonstrates the need for ongoing investigation of healthcare disparities at all interfaces of patient care and provides a way forward for tangible improvement of patient-directed outcomes by utilizing an actionable metric within a quality improvement framework.

Addressing Bias in Acute Postoperative Pain Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates disparities in acute postoperative pain management with regard to gender, race, socioeconomic status, age, and language. Strategies for addressing bias are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Inequities in acute postoperative pain management may lead to longer hospital stays and adverse health outcomes. Recent literature suggests that there are disparities in acute pain management related to patient gender, race, and age. Interventions to address these disparities are reviewed but require further investigation. Recent literature highlights inequities in postoperative pain management, particularly in relation to gender, race, and age. There is a need for continued research in this area. Strategies such as implicit bias training and using culturally competent pain measurement scales may help reduce these disparities. Continued efforts by both providers and institutions to address and eliminate biases in postoperative pain management are needed to ensure better health outcomes.

Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia Use After Cesarean Delivery Under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study in 729 US Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Optimizing analgesia after cesarean delivery is essential to quality of patient recovery. The American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology recommend multimodal analgesia (MMA). However, little is known about clinical implementation of these guidelines after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia (GA). We performed this study to describe the use of MMA after cesarean delivery under GA in the United States and determine factors associated with use of MMA, variation in analgesia practice across hospitals, and trends in MMA use over time.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of women over 18 years who had a cesarean delivery under GA between 2008 and 2018 was conducted using the Premier Healthcare database (Premier Inc). The primary outcome was utilization of opioid-sparing MMA (osMMA), defined as receipt of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen with or without opioids and without the use of an opioid-combination drug. Any use of either agent within a combination preparation was not considered osMMA. The secondary outcome was use of optimal opioid-sparing MMA (OosMMA), defined as use of a local anesthetic technique such as truncal block or local anesthetic infiltration in addition to osMMA. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with use of osMMA, as well as variation across hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 130,946 patients were included in analysis. osMMA regimens were used in 11,133 patients (8.5%). Use of osMMA increased from 2.0% in 2008 to 18.8% in 2018. Black race (7.9% vs 9.3%; odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 0.87 [0.81-0.94]) and Hispanic ethnicity (8.6% vs 10.0%; OR, 0.86 [0.79-0.950]) were associated with less receipt of osMMA compared to White and non-Hispanic counterparts. Medical comorbidities were generally not associated with receipt of osMMA, although patients with preeclampsia were less likely to receive osMMA (9.0%; OR, 0.91 [0.85-0.98]), while those with a history of drug abuse (12.5%; OR, 1.42 [1.27-1.58]) were more likely to receive osMMA. There was moderate interhospital variability in the use of osMMA (intraclass correlation coefficient = 38%). OosMMA was used in 2122 (1.6%) patients, and utilization increased from 0.8% in 2008 to 4.1% in 2018.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in osMMA utilization was observed after cesarean delivery under GA in this cohort of US hospitals. While increasing trends in utilization of osMMA and OosMMA are encouraging, there is need for increased attention to postoperative analgesia practices after GA for cesarean delivery given low percentage of patients receiving osMMA and OosMMA.

Antepartum depressive symptoms are associated with significant postpartum opioid use

BACKGROUND

Antepartum depression is common, and outside of childbirth preoperative anxiety and depression have been associated with heightened postoperative pain. In light of the national opioid epidemic, the relationship between antepartum depressive symptoms and postpartum opioid use is particularly relevant.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the association between antepartum depressive symptoms and significant postpartum opioid use during birth hospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study at an urban academic medical center from 2017 to 2019 included patients who received prenatal care at the medical center and linked pharmacy and billing data with electronic medical records. The exposure was antepartum depressive symptoms, defined as Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ≥10 during the antepartum period. The outcome was significant opioid use, defined as: (1) any opioid use following vaginal birth and (2) the top quartile of total opioid use following cesarean delivery. Postpartum opioid use was quantified using standard conversions for opioids dispensed on postpartum days 1 to 4 to calculate morphine milligram equivalents. Poisson regression was used to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, stratified by mode of delivery and adjusted for suspected confounders. Mean postpartum pain score was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The cohort included 6094 births; 2351 births (38.6%) had an antepartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score. Of these, 11.5% had a maximum score ≥10. Significant opioid use was observed in 10.6% of births. We found that individuals with antepartum depressive symptoms were more likely to have significant postpartum opioid use, with an adjusted risk ratio of 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.0). When stratified by mode of delivery, this association was more pronounced for cesarean births, with an adjusted risk ratio of 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.7), and was no longer significant for vaginal births. Mean pain scores after cesarean delivery were significantly higher in parturients with antepartum depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Antepartum depressive symptoms were associated with significant postpartum inpatient opioid use, especially following cesarean delivery. Whether identifying and treating depressive symptoms in pregnancy may impact the pain experience and opioid use postpartum warrants further investigation.

The association of patient age, race, and demographic features on reported pain and sedation dosing during procedural abortion: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To explore impact of age, racial, demographic, and psychosocial factors on patients' dosage of analgesia and maximum pain score during procedural abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed retrospective chart review of pregnant individuals undergoing procedural abortion at our hospital-based abortion clinic from October 2019 through May 2020. Patients were stratified into age groups,<19 years, 19 to 35 years, and>35 years. We conducted the Kruskal-Wallis H test to evaluate for medication dosing or maximum pain score differences among groups.

RESULTS

We included 225 patients in our study. We found no difference in fentanyl or midazolam dosing by age. The median fentanyl dose was 75 mcg and median midazolam dose was 2 mg in all three groups (p = 0.61, p = 0.99). White patients received higher median midazolam dosing than Black patients (2 and 3 mg, respectively, p < 0.01) despite similar pain scores. Despite no difference in pain scores, patients terminating for genetic anomaly received more fentanyl than those terminating for socioeconomic reasons (75 and 100 mcg, respectively, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our limited study, we found that White race and induced abortion for genetic anomaly were associated with increased medication dosing, though age was not. Multiple demographic and psychosocial factors, as well as perhaps provider bias, play into both a patient's perception of pain and the dosage of fentanyl and midazolam they receive during abortion procedures.

IMPLICATIONS

By acknowledging both patient factors and provider biases in medication dosing, we can provide more equitable abortion care.

Review of racial/ethnic disparities in obstetrics-related anesthesia administration and pain management

While racial/ethnic disparities in maternal outcomes including mortality and severe maternal morbidity are well documented, there is limited information on disparities in obstetric anesthesia practices. This paper reviews literature on racial/ethnic disparities in peripartum anesthesia administration and postpartum pain management. Current literature demonstrates racial/ethnic disparities in several aspects of obstetric anesthesia care including neuraxial administration for vaginal labor pain, neuraxial versus general anesthesia for cesarean delivery, post neuraxial anesthesia complications, postpartum pain management and postdural puncture headache treatment practices. However, many studies are dated or have limited data from single institutions or states. More research on nation-wide racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia is needed to understand its broader practice and management in the USA.

Disparities in Pain Management

Health disparities in pain management remain a pervasive public health crisis. Racial and ethnic disparities have been identified in all aspects of pain management from acute, chronic, pediatric, obstetric, and advanced pain procedures. Disparities in pain management are not limited to race and ethnicity, and have been identified in multiple other vulnerable populations. This review targets health care disparities in the management of pain, focusing on steps health care providers and organizations can take to promote health care equity. A multifaceted plan of action with a focus on research, advocacy, policy changes, structural changes, and targeted interventions is recommended.

Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Health disparities continue to affect racial and ethnic marginalized obstetric patients disproportionally with increased risk of Cesarean delivery and pregnancy-related death. Yet, the literature on what influences such disparities in obstetric anesthesia service and its clinical outcomes is less well known. We set out to describe racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia during the peripartum period in the USA via a scoping review of the recent literature.

SOURCE

Using the Institute of Medicine's definition of disparities, we searched the National Library of Medicine's PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Google Scholar for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2022 to identify literature on racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Out of 8,432 articles reviewed, 15 met our inclusion criteria. All but one study was observational. Seven studies were single-institutional while the remaining used multicentre data/databases. All studies compared two or more race and ethnicity classifications. Studies in this review described disparities in the use of labour epidural analgesia, labour epidural request timing, anesthesia for Cesarean deliveries, postpartum pain management, and epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headaches. Several studies reported disparities observed in the unadjusted models becoming no longer significant when adjusted for other covariates.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of the present scoping review on racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric anesthesia, we present an evidence map identifying knowledge gaps and propose a future research agenda.

Translating Intersectionality to Fair Machine Learning in Health Sciences

Fairness approaches in machine learning should involve more than assessment of performance metrics across groups. Shifting the focus away from model metrics, we reframe fairness through the lens of intersectionality, a Black feminist theoretical framework that contextualizes individuals in interacting systems of power and oppression.

Racial bias in cesarean decision-making

BACKGROUND

Category II fetal heart tracing noted during continuous external fetal monitoring is a frequent indication for cesarean delivery in the United States despite its somewhat subjective interpretation. Black patients have higher rates of cesarean delivery and higher rates for this indication. Racial bias in clinical decision-making has been demonstrated throughout medicine, including in obstetrics.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine if racial bias affects providers' decisions about cesarean delivery for an indication of category II fetal heart tracings.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed an online survey study consisting of 2 clinical scenarios of patients in labor with category II tracings. Patient race was randomized to Black and White; the vignettes were otherwise identical. Participants had the option to continue with labor or to proceed with a cesarean delivery at 3 decision points in each scenario. Participants reported their own demographics anonymously. This survey was distributed to obstetrical providers via email, listserv, and social media. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests at each decision point in the overall sample and in subgroup analyses by various participant demographics.

RESULTS

A total of 726 participants contributed to the study. We did not find significant racial bias in cesarean delivery decision-making overall. However, in a scenario of a patient with a previous cesarean delivery, Fisher's exact tests showed that providers <40 years old (n=322; P=.01) and those with <10 years of experience (n=239; P=.050) opted for a cesarean delivery for Black patients more frequently than for White patients at the first decision point. As labor progressed in this scenario, the rates of cesarean delivery equalized across patient race.

CONCLUSION

Younger providers and those with fewer years of clinical experience demonstrated racial bias in cesarean delivery decision-making at the first decision point early in labor. Providers did not show racial bias as labor progressed, nor in the scenario with a patient without a previous cesarean delivery. This bias may be the consequence of provider training with the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculator, developed in 2007, and widely used to estimate the probability of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery. This calculator used race as a predictive factor until it was removed in June 2021. Future studies should investigate if this bias persists following this change, while also focusing on interventions to address these findings.

Inequities in Inpatient Obstetrics Pain Management and Evaluation: Age, Race, Mental Health, and Obesity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate disparities of pain management among patients giving birth in inpatient Obstetrics units based on age, race, BMI, and mental health diagnoses.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed and included all individuals giving birth at a tertiary-care institution in 2019. Patient-reported pain scores, and inpatient narcotic administration and dosing for pain control were collected. Models were adjusted for race, age, BMI, and diagnoses of anxiety, depression, opioid use disorder, and/or schizophrenia.

RESULTS

4788 Individuals met the inclusion criteria. A higher proportion of African American patients reported severe pain (n = 233/607, 38.4%) and received narcotics (n = 653/1141, 57.2%) compared to patients of other races. Despite controlling for several possible confounders, African American patients (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.22), patients with increased BMI (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), and patients with a mental health diagnosis (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.32-4.12) were more likely to have worse pain at rest. Older patients were more likely to be administered narcotics (n = 447/757, 59.0%) compared to younger patients (patients aged 18-26: n = 577/1257, 52.3%; patients aged 27-35: n = 1451/2774, 52.3%; p < 0.001), despite younger patients being more likely to have severe pain (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.20-1.86; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are Non-Hispanic African American and patients with obesity and mental health diagnoses experience inequities in postpartum pain management. Pain is complex and multifactorial and can be impacted by cultural, social, environmental factors and more. Further studies on factors that influence pain perception and management in inpatient obstetrics units are needed.

Exploring Health Care Disparities in Maternal-Child Simulation-Based Education

AIM

The purpose of this study was to explore student experiences within a health care disparity simulation, embedded in maternal-child content.

BACKGROUND

Health care disparities related to race and ethnicity in the maternal-child population are daunting among African American and Hispanic women.

METHOD

Participants completed the Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified, a rapid-fire huddle questionnaire, and a demographic instrument. All students participated in structured debriefing.

RESULTS

Student responses ( n = 69) demonstrated effectiveness in learning via this scenario.

CONCLUSION

The rapid-fire huddle and debriefing are important elements when health care disparities are introduced into nursing curricula.

Factors Associated With Postoperative Opioid Prescribing After Primary Elective Cesarean Section

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines indicate the need to balance the risks of opioid prescribing with the need to adequately manage pain after cesarean section (CS). Although guidelines suggest the need for tailored opioid prescribing, it is unclear whether providers currently tailor opioid prescribing practices given patient-related factors. Thus, research is needed to first understand post-CS pain management and opioid prescribing. The objective of the present study was to identify factors related to CS discharge opioid prescriptions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board (San Antonio, Texas; #C.2020.094e) on June 23, 2020. Electronic health record data of healthy adult women undergoing primary elective CS, performed under regional neuraxial anesthesia at a single, academic, tertiary medical center from 2018 to 2019, were included. Multivariable regression examined patient and medical factors associated with post-CS opioid prescriptions.

RESULTS

In the present sample (N = 169), 23% (n = 39) of patients did not use opioids postoperatively, while inpatient and almost all of those patients (n = 36) received a discharge prescription for opioids with a median amount of 225 morphine milligram equivalent doses. There was a lack of evidence indicating that patient and medical factors were associated with discharge opioid dose.

CONCLUSION

Patient and medical factors were not associated with post-CS opioid prescribing. Larger studies are needed to better elucidate optimal post-CS pain management in the days and months that follow CS. Such findings are needed to better tailor opioid prescribing, consistent with clinical practice guidelines.

The influence of racial-ethnic discrimination on women's health care outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review

BACKGROUND

In the U.S, a wide body of evidence has documented significant racial-ethnic disparities in women's health, and growing attention has focused on discrimination in health care as an underlying cause. Yet, there are knowledge gaps on how experiences of racial-ethnic health care discrimination across the life course influence the health of women of color. Our objective was to summarize existing literature on the impact of racial-ethnic health care discrimination on health care outcomes for women of color to examine multiple health care areas encountered across the life course.

METHODS

We systematically searched three databases and conducted study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. We included quantitative and qualitative peer-reviewed literature on racial-ethnic health care discrimination towards women of color, focusing on studies that measured patient-perceived discrimination or differential treatment resulting from implicit provider bias. Results were summarized through narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

In total, 84 articles were included spanning different health care domains, such as perinatal and cancer care. Qualitative studies demonstrated the existence of racial-ethnic discrimination across care domains. Most quantitative studies reported a mix of positive and null associations between discrimination and adverse health care outcomes, with variation by the type of health care outcome. For instance, over three-quarters of the studies exploring associations between discrimination/bias and health care-related behaviors or beliefs found significant associations, whereas around two-thirds of the studies on clinical interventions found no significant associations.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows substantial evidence on the existence of racial-ethnic discrimination in health care and its impact on women of color in the U.S. However, the evidence on how this phenomenon influences health care outcomes varies in strength by the type of outcome investigated. High-quality, targeted research using validated measures that is grounded in theoretical frameworks on racism is needed. This systematic review was registered [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018105448].

Racial disparities in post-operative pain experience and treatment following cesarean birth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate racial/ethnic differences in post-operative pain experience and opioid medication use (morphine milligram equivalent) in the first 24 h following cesarean birth.

METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective cohort of birthing persons who underwent cesarean deliveries between 1/1/16 and 12/31/17. A total of 2,228 cesarean deliveries were analyzed. The primary outcome was average pain, which was the mean of all documented self-reported pain scores (0-10 scale) during the first 24 h post-delivery. The secondary outcome included oral morphine equivalents used in the first 24 h post-delivery. Linear regression was performed to examine whether the race/ethnicity of the birthing parent was associated with mean pain scores and oral morphine equivalents, controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

In multivariate analyses non-Hispanic Black birthing persons reported higher mean pain scores (Coefficient: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [0.39-0.82], p < .001]) than non-Hispanic White birthing persons, but received similar quantities of morphine milligram equivalent (Coefficient: -0.98 mg, 95% confidence interval [-5.93-3.97], p = .698]). Non-Hispanic Asian birthing persons reported similar reported mean pain scores to those of non-Hispanic White birthing persons (Coefficient: 0.02 mg, 95% confidence interval [-0.17-0.22], p = .834]), but received less morphine milligram equivalent (Coefficient: -5.47 mg, 95% confidence interval [-10.05 to -0.90], p = .019). When controlling for reported mean pain scores, both non-Hispanic Black (Coefficient: -6.36 mg, 95% confidence interval [-10.97 to -1.75], p = .007) and non-Hispanic Asian birthing persons (Coefficient: -5.66 mg, 95% confidence interval [-9.89 to -1.43], p = .009) received significantly less morphine milligram equivalents.

CONCLUSION

Despite reporting higher mean pain scores, non-Hispanic Black birthing persons did not receive higher quantities of morphine milligram equivalent. Non-Hispanic Asian birthing persons received lower quantities of morphine milligram equivalent despite reporting similar pain scores to non-Hispanic White birthing persons. These differences suggest disparities in post-operative pain management for birthing persons of color in our study population.

CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022

This guideline provides recommendations for clinicians providing pain care, including those prescribing opioids, for outpatients aged ≥18 years. It updates the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016 (MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65[No. RR-1]:1-49) and includes recommendations for managing acute (duration of <1 month), subacute (duration of 1-3 months), and chronic (duration of >3 months) pain. The recommendations do not apply to pain related to sickle cell disease or cancer or to patients receiving palliative or end-of-life care. The guideline addresses the following four areas: 1) determining whether or not to initiate opioids for pain, 2) selecting opioids and determining opioid dosages, 3) deciding duration of initial opioid prescription and conducting follow-up, and 4) assessing risk and addressing potential harms of opioid use. CDC developed the guideline using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Recommendations are based on systematic reviews of the scientific evidence and reflect considerations of benefits and harms, patient and clinician values and preferences, and resource allocation. CDC obtained input from the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (a federally chartered advisory committee), the public, and peer reviewers. CDC recommends that persons with pain receive appropriate pain treatment, with careful consideration of the benefits and risks of all treatment options in the context of the patient's circumstances. Recommendations should not be applied as inflexible standards of care across patient populations. This clinical practice guideline is intended to improve communication between clinicians and patients about the benefits and risks of pain treatments, including opioid therapy; improve the effectiveness and safety of pain treatment; mitigate pain; improve function and quality of life for patients with pain; and reduce risks associated with opioid pain therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death.

Dismantling Structural Barriers: Resident Clinics Refocused on Equity

Disparities in health by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status within obstetrics and gynecology are well described and prompt evaluation for structural barriers. Academic medicine has a historical role in caring for marginalized populations, with medical trainees often serving as first-line clinicians for outpatient care. The ubiquitous approach of concentrating care of marginalized patients within resident and trainee clinics raises ethical questions regarding equity and sends a clear message of value that is internalized by learners and patients. A path forward is elimination of the structural inequities caused by maintenance of clinics stratified by training level, thereby creating an integrated patient pool for trainees and attending physicians alike. In this model, demographic and insurance information is blinded and patient triage is guided by clinical acuity and patient preference alone. To address structural inequities in our health care delivery system, we implemented changes in our department. Our goals were to improve access and patient experience and to send a unified message to our patients, learners, and faculty-our clinical staff, across all training levels, are committed to giving the highest standard of care to all people, regardless of insurance status or ability to pay. Academic medical centers must look internally for structural barriers that contribute to health care disparities within obstetrics and gynecology as we aim to make progress toward equity.