Performance and Diagnostic Value of Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Multiple Gestations

Role of the pediatrician in the initial management of a newborn with Differences of Sex Development or hypospadias

Caring for newborns with atypical genitalia presents significant challenges. With advancements in prenatal imaging and genetic testing, differences of sex development (DSD) diagnoses are increasingly made before birth through ultrasound and genetic testing, offering opportunities to optimally prepare parents for the birth of their child. Although guidelines recommend management in a specialized DSD center, most newborns who have a DSD are born in settings without immediate access to such expertise. Consequently, local healthcare professionals play a crucial role in the initial assessment, communication, and parental support. This document provides a structured approach to conduct a comprehensive physical examination, evaluate the external genitalia, and initiate appropriate biochemical, hormonal and genetic investigations. Clear, neutral, and supportive language is essential when communicating with parents and has been shown to improve outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A structured clinical approach, early consultation with an expert DSD team, and clear, compassionate communication with the parents are key for the initial management of babies born with a DSD and their parents.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Differences in sex development (DSD) are rare, complex congenital conditions that often present with atypical genitalia in newborns, requiring early specialized care from a multidisciplinary team. • International and regional guidelines have been developed for the multidisciplinary management of DSD to improve the quality of care.

WHAT IS NEW

• This article offers practical and structured guidance for pediatricians on the initial management of newborns suspected of having Disorders of Sex Development (DSD), both before and after birth. • It emphasizes the significance of a systematic clinical approach, early consultation with experts, and effective communication with parents.

Diagnostic accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood in detecting chromosomal anomalies in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the diagnostic accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood in detecting fetal chromosomal anomalies in twin pregnancy.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to November 2023. The inclusion criteria were twin pregnancy undergoing cfDNA screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, monosomy X and/or other sex-chromosome aneuploidies (SCA). The index test was cfDNA screening. The reference standard was pre- or postnatal karyotyping (in the case of a positive cfDNA result) or neonatal phenotypic assessment (in case of a negative cfDNA result). The quality of included studies was assessed using the revised quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were computed using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. cfDNA had a high accuracy in detecting trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy, with a sensitivity of 98.8% (95% CI, 96.5-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99.9-100%). Sensitivity and specificity were 94.9% (95% CI, 75.9-99.1%) and 100% (95% CI, 99.9-100%), respectively, for trisomy 18 and 84.6% (95% CI, 54.6-98.1%) and 100% (95% CI, 99.9-100%), respectively, for trisomy 13. We could not compute the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA in detecting monosomy X, owing to an absence of positive cases, while cfDNA had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 71.5-100%) and specificity of 99.8% (95% CI, 99.7-99.9%) for other SCA. The accuracy of cfDNA in detecting the common trisomies was similar in dichorionic and monochorionic twin pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

cfDNA has high diagnostic accuracy in detecting trisomies 21 and 18 in twin pregnancy, irrespective of chorionicity. Estimation of diagnostic accuracy for trisomy 13 and other SCA was limited by the small number of affected cases and the difficulty associated with detecting false-negative cases of other SCA, and thus requires confirmation in larger studies. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Guideline No. 456: Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

To review the available prenatal aneuploidy screening options and to provide updated clinical guidelines for reproductive care providers.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant persons receiving counselling and providing informed consent for prenatal screening.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline should increase clinician competency to offer counselling for prenatal screening options and provide appropriate interventions. Given the variety of available options for prenatal screening with different performance, cost, and availability across Canada, appropriate counselling is of paramount importance to offer the best individual choice to Canadian pregnant persons. Prenatal screening may cause anxiety, and the decisions about prenatal diagnostic procedures are complex given the potential risk of fetal loss.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to July 2023, using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, non-invasive prenatal screening) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1995 to July 2023.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Health care providers involved in prenatal screening, including general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, geneticists, and radiologists.

SOCIAL MEDIA ABSTRACT

Non-invasive prenatal screening is the most accurate method for detecting major aneuploidies. It is not universally available in the public health system and has some limitations.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Non-invasive cell-free DNA prenatal screening for trisomy 21 as part of primary screening strategy in twin pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

The performance of non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy is underevaluated, while serum marker-based strategies yield poor results. This study aimed to assess the performance of non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy as a first-tier test. Secondary objectives were to assess its failure rate and factors associated with failure.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included twin pregnancies in which non-invasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA was performed as the primary screening strategy between May 2017 and October 2019. We used the NIPT VeriSeq® test for in-vitro diagnosis and set a fetal fraction cut-off of 4% for monochorionic pregnancies and 8% for dichorionic ones. Clinical data and pregnancy outcome were collected from physicians or midwives via a questionnaire or were retrieved directly on-site. We calculated the performance of non-invasive cell-free DNA screening for trisomy 21, analyzed its failure rate and assessed potentially associated factors.

RESULTS

Among 1885 twin pregnancies with follow-up, there were six (0.32%) confirmed cases of trisomy 21. The sensitivity of non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21 was 100% (95% CI, 54.1-100%) and the false-positive rate was 0.23% (95% CI, 0.06-0.59%). The primary failure rate was 4.6%, with 4.0% being due to insufficient fetal fraction. A successful result was obtained for 65.4% of women who underwent a new blood draw, reducing the overall failure rate to 2.8%. Maternal body mass index, gestational age at screening as well as chorionicity were significantly associated with the risk of failure.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence of the high performance, at an extremely low false-positive rate, of non-invasive prenatal screening in twins as part of a primary screening strategy for trisomy 21. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Performance of cell-free DNA testing for common fetal trisomies in triplet pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result.

CONCLUSION

cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information.

Clinical Experience with Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Twin Pregnancy Samples at a Single Center in Germany

In this study we wanted to determine the performance of a paired-end sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) assay in the detection of common fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy samples. Samples from patients with a twin pregnancy were collected from at least 10 weeks of gestation and analyzed at a single prenatal center in Germany. Results of Anomaly Detected (i.e., high risk) or No Anomaly Detected (i.e., low risk) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 were reported. Follow-up confirmatory outcomes were requested for all cases. A total of 1,658 patients with twin pregnancies submitted samples during the study period; only two of these samples failed resulting in a low failure rate of 0.12%. Of the remaining 1,656 cases, there were 1,625 (98.1%) low-risk and 31 (1.9%) high-risk NIPT samples in our cohort. Of these, follow-up information was available for 301 (18.5%) of the low-risk samples and 19 (61.3%) of the high-risk samples. All of the low-risk cases with follow-up were determined to be true negatives giving an estimated negative predictive value of 100%. Seventeen of the 19 high-risk samples with follow-up were true positives, resulting in an overall positive predictive value of 89.5%. Sensitivities of > 99.9% were noted for both trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, with high specificities of ≥ 99.7% observed for all three trisomies. In conclusion, our study showed strong performance of the NIPT assay in the detection of common fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy samples, with high sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values observed based on known clinical outcomes along with a low failure rate.

Monochorionic twins with discordant trisomy 21, another case to remind this uncommon condition and how to deal with

Monozygotic twins discordant for trisomy 21 are rare. We present the twelfth reported case of this uncommon condition undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis. Dealing with discordant fetal anomalies in monochorionic pregnancy can be challenging for physicians and patients; pros and cons of different invasive procedure options must be discussed with the couple, contending with certain specific peculiarities of this type of pregnancy. Although chorionic villi sampling can be performed earlier, higher risk of misdiagnosis of discordant aneuploidy is reported. Indeed, when heterokaryotic twins are suspected, a two-sampling amniocentesis is recommended, to ensure independent sampling of each fetus and to rule out confined placental mosaicism as well. The couple should be informed of the possible management and the risks for the non-affected twin whether selective reduction is required, and likewise if the pregnancy continues without selective termination.

Noninvasive prenatal testing, ultrasonographic findings and poor prenatal diagnosis rates for twin pregnancies: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly used in the clinical prenatal screening of twin pregnancies, and its screening performance for chromosomal abnormalities requires further evaluation. For twin pregnancies with indications for prenatal diagnosis, there is a lack of clinical data to assess the prenatal diagnosis rate (PDR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of NIPT for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies and the PDR in the second and third trimesters.

METHODS

Ultrasound scans were carried out for all twin pregnancies between 11 and 13^+ 6 gestational weeks. For twin pregnancies with nuchal translucency thickness˂3.0 mm and no foetal structural malformations, NIPT was performed after blood sampling, followed by routine ultrasound monitoring. Women with twin pregnancies who underwent NIPT at the prenatal diagnostic centre of Xiangya Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022 were included in the study. Genetic counselling was offered to each pregnant woman when the NIPT result indicated a high risk of abnormalities or abnormal ultrasonographic (USG) findings were detected. We followed up twin pregnancies for NIPT results, USG findings, prenatal diagnosis results and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

In 1754 twin pregnancies, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of NIPT for trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.9% and 75%, and the corresponding values for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were 100%, 99.9% and 50%, respectively. For the 14 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a high risk of abnormalities, the PDR was 78.6% (11/14). For the 492 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a low risk of abnormalities, the rate of USG findings in the second and third trimesters was 39.4% (194/492); of these pregnancies, prenatal diagnosis was recommended for 16.7% (82/492), but it was actually performed in only 8.3% (41/492), and the PDR was 50% (41/82). There was no significant difference in the PDR between the NIPT high-risk and low-risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The screening performance of NIPT for SCA in twin pregnancies needs to be further evaluated. When abnormal NIPT results or USG findings are used as the main prenatal diagnostic indicator in the second and third trimesters, the PDR is poor.

Clinical Experience with Genome-Wide Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in a Large Cohort of Twin Pregnancies

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in twin gestations has been shown to have high detection rates and low false-positive rates for trisomy 21, as seen in singleton pregnancies, although there have been few large cohort twin studies, genome-wide studies in particular, to date. In this study, we looked at the performance of genome-wide NIPT in a large cohort consisting of 1244 twin pregnancy samples collected over a two-year period in a single laboratory in Italy. All samples underwent an NIPS for common trisomies, with 61.5% of study participants choosing to undergo genome-wide NIPS for additional fetal anomalies (namely, rare autosomal aneuploidies and CNVs). There were nine initial no-call results, all of which were resolved upon retest. Based on our NIPS results, 17 samples were at high risk for trisomy 21, one for trisomy 18, six for a rare autosomal aneuploidy, and four for a CNV. Clinical follow-up was available for 27 out of 29 high-risk cases; a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.9%, and a PPV of 94.4% were noted for trisomy 21. Clinical follow-up was also available for 1110 (96.6%) of the low-risk cases, all of which were true negatives. In conclusion, we found that NIPS was a reliable screening approach for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies.

Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

About one in five twin pregnancies are monochorionic diamniotic. In these twins, transfusion imbalances may develop due to the invariably present vascular anastomoses. The most severe imbalance is twin-twin transfusion syndrome, which presents as a significant amniotic fluid difference diagnosed on ultrasound scan, usually before 26 weeks. Another transfusion imbalance is twin anemia polycythemia sequence, a severe hemoglobin difference occurring mainly after 26 weeks in previously uncomplicated pregnancies. Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the anastomoses addresses the cause of these transfusion imbalances. Besides transfusion imbalances, the monochorionic placenta may be unevenly divided, or one part may be dysfunctional, leading to an intertwin growth difference of more than 20%. Here, laser ablation of the anastomoses will usually not cure the problem but aims to protect the appropriately growing twin if the growth-restricted co-twin dies. In monochorionic twins, structural anomalies are twice as common as in singleton pregnancies, probably due to a teratogenic effect of the embryonic splitting or because of transfusion imbalances. In contrast, chromosomal anomalies appear less common, possibly because they more likely result in an early demise. Selective reduction is feasible in monochorionic pregnancies but carries increased risks of loss, miscarriage, and early birth than a selective reduction in a dichorionic setting. Finally, if one monochorionic twin dies spontaneously, its co-twin may acutely exsanguinate into the demised co-twin, which may result in the loss of both twins or brain damage in the surviving twin. This update addresses the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of these common complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies.