Social factors affecting treatment of cervical cancer: ethical issues and policy implications

Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening and Its Barriers Using Health Belief Model Among Health Professionals Working in Public Hospitals in South Gondar Zone, Northcentral Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Cervical cancer is a malignant neoplasm that originates in the cervix, and it is a leading cause of mortality, with 270,000 deaths every year globally. Of these, 85% occur in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Routine cervical cancer screening and early treatment can prevent up to 80% of cervical cancers. Health professionals are expected to screen for and be screened for cervical cancer. However, there is limited information about the uptake of cervical cancer screening among health professionals in the study area.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake and identify its barriers among health professionals.

Methods

A multicenter cross-sectional study design was conducted among health professionals from December 01 to 30, 2022. A total of 164 respondents were included in the study, and simple random sampling was used to select the respondents. Variables with a p-value of <0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) were considered significantly associated with the outcome variable.

Results

Of the total respondents, 112 (68.3%) were younger than the age of 30 years, with a mean age of 29.4 years ranging from 21 to 45 years. Seventy-nine of the respondents (48.2%) have work experience of 6-10 years, and 103 (62.8%) are nurses in profession. In this study, the magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake was 28.1% (95% CI: 27.7%-35.6%). Moreover, attitude (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.1-5.1), age at first sexual intercourse (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3-3.4), having history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs; AOR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.5-11.6), knowing someone who had been screened (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.8-4.8), and cervical cancer screening training (AOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9) were significantly associated with cervical cancer screening.

Conclusion

Generally, this study reported that the magnitude of cervical cancer screening uptake was low. The study also indicated that attitude, age at first sexual intercourse, history of STIs, knowing someone who had been screened, and training of cervical cancer screening were independent predictors of uptake of cervical cancer screening.

Regional Variation in Access to Oncologic Care and Racial Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine whether access to gynecologic oncologists is correlated with disparate outcomes among cervical cancer patients, especially among Black women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An ecological study was performed using the National Cancer Database among stage I-IVA cervical cancer patients from 2004 to 2014. Data from the National Cancer Institute, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and the United States Census were compiled to describe access to care by region. Factors associated with receipt of optimal treatment (defined as surgery and/or radiation for stage IA-IB1 and IIA1; radiation and chemotherapy for stage IB2, IIA2, IIB-IVA or node positive disease) were identified using multivariate logistic regressions stratified by region, controlling for confounding factors including the number of gynecologic oncologists per states in each subregion. Cox multivariate survival analyses stratified by region were also performed.

RESULTS

Of 42,213 women, 17.0% were Black. On multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, all Southern women were less likely to receive optimal treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.75-0.85, P <0.001) compared with Northeastern women. Black women in the South (aOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.83, P <0.001) and Midwest (aOR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.90, P <0.001) were less likely to receive optimal treatment compared with non-Black women in those regions. Black women in the South (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04-1.18, P <0.001) and West (aHR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11-1.62, P =0.002) had worse mortality compared with non-Black women in those regions, despite controlling for access to gynecologic oncologists. The South, Midwest, and West had proportionally fewer cancer centers and gynecologic oncologists compared with the Northeast.

CONCLUSIONS

Southern women are at risk of inadequate treatment for cervical cancer, and Black Southern women are at even higher risk of inadequate treatment and worse overall survival despite controlling for access to gynecologic oncologists. Social determinants of health and other barriers besides access to oncologists likely contribute to observed regional and racial disparities among cervical cancer patients.

Race- and Age-Related Disparities in Cervical Cancer Mortality

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of cervical cancer among younger Black women is now equivalent to that of White women, it is unknown whether the reduced incidence has affected survival rates among younger Black women. The goal of this study was to assess differences in survival by age and race.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Cancer Database to analyze women with nonmetastatic cervical cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2014. Women with unknown survival data and those who died within 3 months of diagnosis were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated interactions between age and race (Black vs non-Black) for presentation with stage I disease and receipt of optimal treatment. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate survival differences by age and race.

RESULTS

Of 55,659 women included, 16.4% were Black. Compared with their non-Black counterparts, fewer Black women presented with stage I disease (37.8% vs 47.8%; P<.01) and received optimal treatment (46.2% vs 58.3%; P<.01). Fewer Black women had private insurance if they were aged <65 years (39.6% vs 55.7%; P<.01), but not if they were aged ≥65 years (11.7% vs 12.4%; P=.43). According to multivariable logistic regression, Black women aged ≤39 years were less likely to present with stage I disease, with a significant interaction term between age and race (P<.01 for interaction). Disparities in overall survival by race were greatest for Black women aged ≤39 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46; P<.01) but decreased with increasing age interval until no disparity was noted for women aged ≥65 years (P<.01 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Younger Black women with cervical cancer are at risk for presenting with higher-stage disease and having worse overall survival. These findings may be related to insurance-related disparities and inadequate follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou test results. Younger Black women with cervical cancer may be a particularly vulnerable population.

HIV status, age at cervical Cancer screening and cervical cytology outcomes in an opportunistic screening setting in Nigeria: a 10-year Cross sectional data analysis

BACKGROUND

Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is more prevalent in HIV infected women and occurs at younger median age than in HIV negative women. Organized cervical cancer screening (CCS) is presently lacking in Nigeria, and the age at CCS is not known in this population. We sought to examine the age at CCS, the cytology outcomes and whether outcomes differ by HIV infection status in an opportunistic screening setting.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of data on a sample of women who had received a CCS in an opportunistic screening service in Jos, Nigeria over a 10-year time period (2006-2016). We used logistic regression models to estimate the independent effect of patient-reported HIV and age at CCS and odds ratios for abnormal cytology outcomes adjusting for other covariates. We also assessed the correlation between median age at CCS and severity of abnormal cervical cytology outcomes. Statistical analyses were done on STATA version 14, College Station, Texas, USA.

RESULTS

In a sample of 14,088, the median age at CCS was 37 years (IQR; 30-45). For HIV infected women vs. uninfected women, CCS occurred at earlier ages (35.0 ± 7.4 vs 38.2 ± 10.2 years, p < 0.001). All women, regardless of HIV status, who completed at least 7 or more years of education were 1.27 to 3.51 times more likely to have CCS before age 35 than women with less education. The predictors of an abnormal cervical cytology outcome at CCS were: age at CCS ≥ 35 (aOR = 3.57; 95% CI: 2.74, 4.64), multiparity ≥5 (aOR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.56), and provider-referral (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.64). Irrespective of reported HIV status, we found a positive correlation between median age at CCS and severity of cytology outcome.

DISCUSSION

The age at CCS in women who have utilized cervical cancer screening in the study population is relatively late compared to the recommended age by most guidelines from developed settings. Late age at CCS correlates positively with severity of abnormal cytology outcome irrespective of HIV status. More educated women are more likely to have CCS at early age and less likely to have underlying abnormal cytology outcomes.

The Need for Societal Investment to Improve Cervical Cancer Outcomes in Nigeria: A commentary

Although cervical cancer is a preventable cancer with a well-known natural history, it remains a huge burden in developing countries of sub-Saharan Africa where organized cervical cancer screening services are lacking. Developed countries that have invested on providing organized screening programs have made substantial progress in reducing both incidence and mortality due to cervical cancer. Implementing evidence-based interventions such as human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of young girls, early detection and treatment of premalignant conditions of the cervix through conventional Pap cytology, HPV screening or visual aided inspection with acetic acid could significantly reduce incidence of new cases at population level. Societal investment for such preventive services and provision of effective treatment for those diagnosed at early stages will yield economic benefits in reducing premature deaths of women at the prime of their productive lives. From a societal perspective, this should be a priority area for national investment towards the achievement of sustainable development in Nigeria and similar settings in Africa.

Challenges to Pap Smear Follow-up among Women in the Criminal Justice System

Women involved in the United States criminal justice system face a variety of challenges in maintaining their health. Histories of sexual abuse, early initiation of sex, and substance abuse are reflected in more negative reproductive health outcomes, including cervical cancer, than those found among non-incarcerated women. Little is known about how to close this health gap. The present study assessed what incarcerated women perceived to be facilitators and inhibitors of obtaining recommended follow-up for abnormal Pap tests. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 44 women in an urban county jail about experiences with Pap tests and how they followed-up on abnormal results. We analyzed data using the process of thematic content analysis. Four themes were found, Pap test abnormality as an all-inclusive phrase for women's health problems, unstable lives, the structural challenges of money, and competing demands. Women with criminal justice histories have numerous and complex challenges in following-up abnormal Pap test results, as well as other health problems. Understanding the context around the follow-up for abnormal Pap tests in this population may increase providers' ability to help women effectively obtain cancer prevention care that can be life-saving, as well as to more effectively provide care for other health problems.

Surgical pathology and the patient: a systematic review evaluating the primary audience of pathology reports

The pathology report is a critical document that helps guide the management of patients with cancer. More and more patients read their reports, intending to participate in decisions about their care. However, a substantial subset of patients may lack the ability to comprehend this often technical and complex document. We hypothesized that most literature on pathology reports discusses reports from the perspective of other physicians and not from the perspective of patients. An expert panel of physicians developed a list of search criteria, which we used to identify articles on PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers independently evaluated all articles to identify for detailed review those that met search criteria. We identified the primary audience of the selected articles and the degree to which these articles addressed clarity of communication of pathology reports with patients. Of 801 articles identified in our search, 25 involved the formatting of pathology reports for clarity of communication. Recurrent themes in proposed improvements in reports included content standardization, variation in terminology, clarity of communication, and quality improvement. No articles discussed patients as their target audience. No study evaluated the health literacy level required of patients to comprehend pathology reports. In summary, there is a scarcity of patient-centered approaches to improve pathology reports. The literature on pathology reports does not include patients as a target audience. Limited resources are available to help patients comprehend their reports. Efforts to improve patient-centered communication are desirable to address this overlooked aspect of patient care.

Distance traveled for treatment of cervical cancer: who travels the farthest, and does it impact outcome?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of distance from residence to treatment center on disease characteristics and recurrence of cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution retrospective chart review of patients treated for cervical cancer during 2006-2011 was performed. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Distance traveled from home to treatment facility was calculated and categorized. Recurrence and follow-up data were extracted; progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated. SAS version 9.2 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen patients met the study criteria; 75% were Caucasian. Forty-nine percent used tobacco. Twenty-five percent had stage III/IV disease. Insurance type was 46% private, 25% Medicaid, 20% Medicare, and 9% uninsured. Distance between residence and hospital was less than 15 miles (29%), 15 to 30 miles (21%), 30 to 50 miles (17%), and more than 50 miles (33%). Median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 1-65). Caucasians were more likely to travel more than 30 miles to a treatment center (P = 0.018) Non-Caucasians were less likely to have private insurance (P = 0.0005) and more likely to recur (P = 0.0045). Recurrence was highest (50%) in African Americans. Travel of more than 30 miles was not associated with age, stage, histology, tobacco abuse, employment, clinical trial enrollment, primary chemoradiation for stage IB disease, or delayed radiation. Travel of more than 30 miles was associated with government insurance (P = 0.029) and a trend toward unemployment (P = 0.059). Four-year progression-free survival (53% vs 52%; P = 0.992) and overall survival (57% vs 62%; P = 0.73) were similar between less than or more than 30-mile travel.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty percent of the patients reside more than 30 miles from treating hospital. Despite farther travel, stage of disease, clinical trial enrollment, treatment type, radiation completion, and recurrence rates were similar among patients with cervical cancer. Non-Caucasians are less likely to travel more than 30 miles.

A replicable model of a health literacy curriculum for a third-year clerkship

Contrary to recommendations from national medical organizations, medical school education often fails to train students to interact effectively with patients with limited health literacy. The objectives of a new health literacy curriculum in a family medicine clerkship were to increase students' knowledge of health literacy and develop comfort with specific communication skills. Instructional strategies included lectures, practice with standardized patients (SPs), and a facilitated discussion board. At the end of the first year of the curriculum, there was a statistically significant increase in students' knowledge of health literacy. During the final testing with SPs, students achieved high scores for health literacy related communication skills. The curriculum is replicable at other universities and was an effective and efficient way for medical students to learn about health literacy and to acquire valuable skills to improve their patients' understanding of health information.

Health care reform and women's insurance coverage for breast and cervical cancer screening

INTRODUCTION

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) will increase insurance coverage for US citizens and for breast and cervical cancer screening through insurance expansions and regulatory changes. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the number of low-income women who would gain health insurance after implementation of the ACA and thus be able to obtain cancer screening. A secondary objective was to estimate the size and characteristics of the uninsured low-income population and the number of women who would still need National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) services.

METHODS

We used the nationally representative 2009 American Community Survey to estimate the determinants of insurance status for women in Massachusetts, assuming full implementation of the ACA. We extrapolated findings to simulate the effects of the ACA on each state. We used individual-level predicted probabilities of being uninsured to generate estimates of the number of women who would gain health insurance after implementation of the ACA and to predict demand for NBCCEDP services.

RESULTS

Approximately 6.8 million low-income women would gain health insurance, potentially increasing the annual demand for NBCCEDP cancer screenings initially by about 500,000 mammograms and 1.3 million Papanicolaou tests. Despite a 60% decrease in the number of low-income uninsured women, the NBCCEDP would still serve fewer than one-third of the estimated number of women eligible for services. The NBCCEDP-eligible population would comprise a larger number of women with language and literacy-related barriers to care.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the ACA would increase insurance coverage and access to cancer screening for millions of women, but the NBCCEDP will remain essential for the millions who will remain uninsured.

Impact of payer status on treatment of cervical cancer at a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to determine the impact of payer status on the likelihood of receiving definitive treatment for invasive cervical cancer at a tertiary medical center.

METHODS

All consecutive patients presenting to Johns Hopkins Hospital with a diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer between 1/1/95-12/31/08 were retrospectively identified from the tumor registry. Demographic and clinical information were abstracted from the medical record. Payer status was categorized as private, public, no insurance, or unknown. Treatment was defined as surgery, chemo-radiation, chemotherapy, radiation, or no definitive therapy. The likelihood of receiving no definitive therapy was analyzed using Pearson chi-square analysis, univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS

A total of 306 patients were identified. Median age was 47 and 60% of patients had early stage disease at diagnosis (stages IA-IIA). Fifty-six percent of the cohort had private insurance, 34% had public insurance, and 6% had no insurance. Having no insurance was the single most significant risk factor associated with receiving no standard therapy. While 7% of privately insured and 4% of publicly insured patients did not receive definitive therapy, 16% of uninsured patients did not receive definitive treatment. In multivariate analysis controlling for age, race, stage, histology, and comorbidities, uninsured payer status was a significant and independent predictor of receiving no definitive treatment (OR 8.01, CI 1.265-50.694, p=0.027) than patients with public insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, uninsured payer status was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of not receiving standard therapy for cervical cancer. Additional studies are warranted to characterize specific barriers to care for this at-risk population.