Cervical Length Screening With Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage Compared With History-Indicated Cerclage for Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Meta-Analysis

[Primary and secondary cerclage in high-risk pregnant women: Influence on prolongation of pregnancy and preterm birth]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cerclage in women with previous late miscarriages or premature births. The primary aim was to prolong pregnancy and achieve a term delivery. Secondarily, it was investigated whether an intervention after an early pathological 75-g-oGTT result influences these endpoints.

METHODS

A total of 133 cases were analyzed retrospectively. 80 women underwent primary cerclage between the 14th and 16th week of pregnancy; 53 women underwent secondary cerclage after cervical shortening of less than 25 mm. This group was further subdivided into therapeutic and emergency cerclage groups. Women with early pathologic 75-g-oGTT were treated diabetologically.

RESULTS

Primary cerclage prolonged pregnancy by 20.6 weeks and led to a term delivery in 51 women (63.8%). In the group with secondary cerclage, 25 women (47.2%) had a term delivery with a prolongation of 20.1 weeks. For amniotic sac prolapse, the prolongation was 7.9 weeks. Pathological 75-g-oGTT results were found in 63 women. Early intervention had no significant effect on prolongation and term delivery.

CONCLUSION

Primary cerclage was more effective in achieving term delivery. Women with therapeutic cerclage without amniotic sac prolapse also benefited. With cervical shortening without prolapse, the prolongation was the same in both groups. The worst outcome was observed in emergency cerclage with amniotic sac prolapse. An early 75-g-oGTT is important in order to recognize and treat gestational diabetes in time.

Transvaginal Cervical Screening in Individuals with Previous Late Preterm Birth

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound cervical length (CL) screening in reducing preterm births among individuals with various preterm birth histories, aiming to optimize prevention strategies.

STUDY DESIGN

 This retrospective cohort study included 576 pregnant individuals with singleton pregnancies and a history of preterm birth, who underwent transvaginal ultrasound CL screening between January 2014 and December 2020. The primary outcome was the detection of a short cervix (≤2.5 cm). We compared outcomes among individuals with a previous gestational age (GA) of 34 to 36, 28 to 33, 24 to 27, and <24 weeks. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using modified Poisson's regression with robust variance, controlling for predefined confounders.

RESULTS

 Of 576 (35%), 139 (24.1%) had a previous birth at 34 to 36 weeks, 129 (22.4%) had a previous birth at 28 to 33 weeks, 90 (15.6%) had a previous birth at 24 to 27 weeks, and 218 (37.8%) had a previous birth <24 weeks. Compared with individuals with a previous GA 34 to 36 weeks, the risk of short cervix was higher in those with a previous <24 weeks (21.6 vs. 52.8%, aRR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.81-3.62) and GA 24 to 27 weeks (40.0%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.20-2.71), but no difference was found with those with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks (24.8%, aRR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.72-1.72). Compared with individuals with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks, individuals with prior GA 34 to 36 weeks had the same risk of cerclage placement and preterm birth <34 weeks, but a lower risk of composite neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

 Based on our results of similar incidence of the short cervix between individuals with previous GA 34 to 36 weeks and those with previous GA 28 to 33 weeks, individuals with a history of late preterm birth should receive CL screening in a similar manner.

KEY POINTS

· Similar short cervix for prior 34 to 36 versus 28 to 33 weeks.. · Lower risk of neonatal outcomes in the prior 34 to 36 weeks of birth.. · Screening is warranted for any prior preterm birth..

Cervical cerclage vs cervical pessary in women with cervical insufficiency: A multicentric, open-label, randomised, controlled pilot trial [the CEPEIC trial]

Objective

Cervical insufficiency accounts for 8 % of preterm births. Pessary and cerclage are considered preventive approaches for preterm birth. These interventions were compared in terms of reducing the prematurity rate in women with previous preterm birth, due to cervical insufficiency or due to having a short cervix in their current pregnancy.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicentric, open-label, randomised, pilot, controlled trial. Participants were women with singleton pregnancies who had previous preterm birth caused by cervical insufficiency or previous preterm birth and a short cervix [≤ 25 mm] in their current pregnancy. Women were randomised [1:1] to either cerclage or pessary. The primary outcome was to assess the feasibility of a trial on cervical pessary vs. cerclage to prevent preterm birth before 34 weeks in women with cervical insufficiency. As a secondary outcome, we studied the morbidity rate of the pessary versus the cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency and assessed the financial impact of using both devices in these women. The sample size was calculated based on the estimated population that we could potentially recruit: 60 women, 30 for each group, to ascertain whether the rate of preterm birth < 34 weeks of gestation may be reduced from 34 % to at least 27 % in the pessary group, as in the results obtained with the cerclage.

Results

No significant differences in preterm birth < 34 weeks of gestation were observed in our study, although it was underpowered to detect these differences [the relative risk [RR] of PB < 34 weeks of gestation was 0.8 [95 % CI: 0.31-2.09, p = 0.888]. The rates of obstetric and perinatal complications were similar for both devices [15 cases in both groups, 50 % of cases [RR; 0.6-1.68; p = 1]. Cervical pessary had fewer secondary effects than the cerclage [less bleeding at insertion in the pessary group compared with cerclage, 1 case vs 14 cases, p < 0.001; less pain at removal in the pessary group compared with cerclage, 14 vs 22 cases. p = 0.042 and less bleeding, 2 cases vs. 10 cases, p = 0.027].

Conclusions

Pessary does not seem less effective than cerclage, although these findings need to be confirmed in a larger randomised controlled trial. Pessary had fewer secondary effects than cerclage both at insertion and removal.

Sinopsis

Cervical pessary does not seem to be less effective than cerclage. Cervical pessary had fewer secondary effects than cerclage.

Changing Indications for Cervical Cerclage Following the Introduction of Routine Ultrasound Surveillance of Cervical Length for Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth

Background

Preterm birth (PTB) is associated with significant neonatal mortality and morbidity. Universal measurement of cervical length has been proposed as a screening tool to direct intervention to prevent PTB.

Aim

To assess the impact of the introduction of sonographic mid-trimester cervical length screening on the use of cervical cerclage and PTB.

Material and Methods

A retrospective cohort study reviewed two groups of women who underwent cervical cerclage before and after the introduction of universal sonographic cervical length screening. Demographics and outcomes were compared using Student's t test, Fisher's Exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

Following introduction of universal cervical length screening, the overall rate of cerclage increased from 2.5/1000 births to 6.0/1000 births (p < 0.01). There was a reduction in the proportion of sutures placed purely based on maternal history (50.0% to 30.4%; p < 0.001), while the proportion of sutures placed following ultrasound assessment increased in both high- (21.7 to 36.6%) and low-risk (11.7% to 30.4%) women (p < 0.001). The overall rate of PTB <37 weeks in women has a cerclage was 25.7% and was highest in women undergoing rescue cerclage (64.3%; p < 0.01). There was no difference in the rate of PTB between high- and low-risk women undergoing history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Mean pregnancy length was most prolonged in low-risk women undergoing ultrasound-indicated cerclage, extending gestation from 33.9 to 38.3 weeks (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Universal cervical length screening results in an increase in the use of cerclage, specifically on the basis of the ultrasound findings. Women who were at low risk but then underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage experienced most prolongation of pregnancy. Women who were at high risk but had a suture on the basis of ultrasound findings-indicated cerclage represent an alternative method of management with no significant difference in the gestational age of delivery.

Antenatal reproductive screening for pregnant people including preconception: Provides the best reproductive opportunity for informed consent, quality, and safety

INTRODUCTION

This antenatal screening review will include reproductive screening evidence and approaches for pre-conception and post-conception, using first to third trimester screening opportunities.

METHODS

Focused antenatal screening peer-reviewed publications were evaluated and summarized.

RESULTS

Evidenced-based reproductive antenatal screening elements should be offered and discussed, with the pregnancy planning or pregnant person, during Preconception (genetic carrier screening for reproductive partners, personal and family (including reproductive partner) history review for increased genetic and pregnancy morbidity risks); First Trimester (fetal dating with ultrasound; fetal aneuploidy screening plus consideration for expanded fetal morbidity criteria, if appropriate; pregnant person preeclampsia screening; early fetal anatomy screening; early fetal cardiac screening); Second Trimester for standard fetal anatomy screening (18-22 weeks) including cardiac; pregnant person placental and cord pathology screening; pregnant person preterm birth screening with cervical length measurement); Third Trimester (fetal growth surveillance; continued preterm birth risk surveillance).

CONCLUSION

Antenatal reproductive screening has multiple elements, is complex, is time-consuming, and requires the use of pre- and post-testing counselling for most screening elements. The use of preconception and trimesters 'one to three' requires clear patient understanding and buy-in. Informed consent and knowledge transfer is a main goal for antenatal reproductive screening approaches.

Preterm birth in low-middle income Countries

Preterm birth (PTB), remains a major cause of significant morbidity and mortality world-wide with about 12-15million preterm births occurring every year. Although the overall trend is decreasing, this is mainly in high-income countries (HIC). The rate remains high in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) varying on average between 10 and 12% compared to 9% in HIC. The pathogenesis of PTB is complex and multifactorial. Attempts to reduce rates that have focused on PTB as a single condition have in general been unsuccessful. However, more recent attempts to phenotype PTB have resulted in targeted preventative approaches which are yielding better results. Prevention (primary or secondary) is the only approach that has been shown to make a difference to rates of PTB. These include identifying risk factors pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy and instituting appropriate measures to address these. In LMIC, although some approaches that have been shown to be effective in some HIC are adaptable, there is a need to involve stakeholders at all levels in utilizing evidence preferrably generated in LMIC to implement strategies that are likely to reduce the rate of PTB. In this review, we focus on prevention and how to involve policy makers in the process of applying evidence into policy that would reduce PTB in LMIC.

Cervical assessment certification and its impact on performance quality in the context of universal cervical screening

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of the introduction of universal transvaginal cervical screening and certification on the quality of cervical length ultrasound images.

METHODS

The present study included a retrospective cohort of singleton pregnancies that underwent transvaginal cervical length measurement at the anatomical scan (180/7 and 236/7 weeks) before (period A, 2015-2017) and after (period B, 2017-2019) the introduction of universal transvaginal cervical length screening. Independent observers blindly evaluated the images obtained for cervical length using a qualitative scoring method based on five criteria, according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation.

RESULTS

In all, 6013 patients met the inclusion criteria, 3333 in period A and 2680 in period B. Maternal characteristics and risk factors for preterm birth were similar between the two periods. The acceptance of transvaginal cervical length measurement in period B was 95.5% in the overall cohort and 100% in the subgroup of high-risk patients. The quality score was significantly higher in period B than in period A. Among the image quality criteria, the anterior/posterior ratio, the correct magnification of the images, and the calipers' placement contributed significantly to the improved quality score in period B. Most of the sonographers performed better in period B, irrespective of the years of experience, but certificate holders obtained higher scores than non-certified sonographers, particularly those in mid-career. The identification of short cervix was significantly higher in period B than in period A.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of universal transvaginal cervical length screening and the certification process are associated with improved quality of cervical length images, even among expert sonographers and in the presence of anatomical pitfalls.

Prevention of spontaneous preterm delivery – an update on where we are today

Spontaneous preterm birth (delivery before 37 completed weeks) is the single most important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The rate is increasing world-wide with a great disparity between low, middle and high income countries. It has been estimated that the cost of neonatal care for preterm babies is more than 4 times that of a term neonate admitted into the neonatal care. Furthermore, there are high costs associated with long-term morbidity in those who survive the neonatal period. Interventions to stop delivery once preterm labor starts are largely ineffective hence the best approach to reducing the rate and consequences is prevention. This is either primary (reducing or minimizing factors associated with preterm birth prior to and during pregnancy) or secondary - identification and amelioration (if possible) of factors in pregnancy that are associated with preterm labor. In the first category are optimizing maternal weight, promoting healthy nutrition, smoking cessation, birth spacing, avoidance of adolescent pregnancies and screening for and controlling various medical disorders as well as infections prior to pregnancy. Strategies in pregnancy, include early booking for prenatal care, screening and managing medical disorders and their complications, and identifying predisposing factors to preterm labor such as shortening of the cervix and timely instituting progesterone prophylaxis or cervical cerclage where appropriate. The use of biomarkers such as oncofetal fibronectin, placental alpha-macroglobulin-1 and IGFBP-1 where cervical screening is not available or to diagnosis PPROM would identify those that require close monitoring and allow the institution of antibiotics especially where infection is considered a predisposing factor. Irrespective of the approach to prevention, timing the administration of corticosteroids and where necessary tocolysis and magnesium sulfate are associated with an improved outcome. The role of genetics, infections and probiotics and how these emerging dimensions help in the diagnosis of preterm birth and consequently prevention are exciting and hopefully may identify sub-populations for targeted strategies.

Cost-effectiveness of history-indicated cerclage vs cervical length assessment for prevention of preterm birth

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth is one of the major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Preterm delivery is a large burden to our health care system, and a history of preterm birth is one of the most common risk factors for subsequent preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of the history-indicated cerclage strategy compared with the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment strategy in individuals with a history of preterm birth.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a decision analysis model to compare history-indicated cerclage and cervical length assessment. The primary outcome was the net monetary benefit from a maternal and neonatal perspective of both strategies, defined as the value of an intervention with a known willingness to pay threshold for a unit of benefit. The time horizon was set to be a lifetime. Costs (in 2022 USD) included those for the cerclage, serial transvaginal ultrasounds, maternal care for admission, neonatal care, and severe disability. Probabilities, utilities, and costs were derived from the literature. A cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000 per QALY (quality-adjusted life year). We first conducted 1-way sensitivity analyses with associated variables as sensitivity analyses. We then performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation with 1000 trials to test the robustness of the results in the setting of simultaneous changes in probabilities, costs, and utilities.

RESULTS

In our base-case analysis, the history-indicated cerclage strategy compared to transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment was associated with more cost ($85,038 vs $70,155), with slightly less effectiveness from the maternal perspective (26.74 QALY vs 26.78 QALY) and from the neonatal perspective (28.91 QALY vs 29.06 QALY), and with less maternal and neonatal net monetary benefit. Therefore, the history-indicated cerclage strategy was dominated. With the 1000 trials of Monte Carlo simulation, transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment was the preferred strategy 84% and 88% of the time from the maternal and neonatal perspectives, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The history-indicated cerclage strategy was more expensive and slightly less effective than the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length assessment strategy with a lower net monetary benefit.

Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth

After the United States Food and Drug Administration pulled 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate from the market for its use in prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth, national societies have had mixed recommendations regarding the management of patients with a singleton pregnancy and previous spontaneous preterm birth. Herein we highlight the randomized trial data and translational evidence supporting the use of vaginal progesterone for prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Prophylactic vaginal progesterone starting at 16 weeks and 0 days every night should be offered to patients with singletons and previous singleton spontaneous preterm birth regardless of cervical length, and continued along with placement of cerclage if a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length ≤25 mm is detected at <24 weeks.

Reassessing Preterm Birth Prevention After the Withdrawal of 17-α Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently withdrawn approval for 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth, and recent studies have called into question benefits of the pessary in the setting of a short cervix. Obstetric health care professionals are once again left with limited remaining options for preterm birth prevention. This narrative review summarizes the best current evidence on the use of vaginal progesterone, low-dose aspirin, and cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth; attempts to distill possible lessons learned from studies of progesterone and pessary, as well as their implementation into practice; and highlights areas where inroads into preterm birth prevention may be possible outside of the progesterone-aspirin-cerclage paradigm.

Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, September 2022) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Etiology, Prediction, Primary and Secondary Prevention of Preterm Birth

Aim This revised guideline was coordinated by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). It aims to improve the prediction, prevention, and management of preterm birth, based on evidence from the current literature, the experience of members of the guidelines commission, and the viewpoint of self-help organizations. Methods The members of the contributing professional societies and organizations developed recommendations and statements based on international literature. The recommendations and statements were presented and adopted using a formal process (structured consensus conferences with neutral moderation, written Delphi vote). Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents statements and recommendations on the epidemiology, etiology, prediction, and primary and secondary prevention of preterm birth.

Measurement of cervical softness before cerclage placement with an aspiration-based device

BACKGROUND

An abnormally soft cervix could contribute to the pathophysiology of cervical shortening and cervical insufficiency. Multiple techniques to measure cervical softness have been developed but none are used routinely in clinical practice. A clinically acceptable technique to measure cervical softness could improve identification of patients at risk for cervix-related preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure cervical softness in patients with cervical insufficiency and in normal controls using a novel, aspiration-based device. We hypothesized that the cervix is softer in patients with cervical insufficiency.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study of patients presenting for cerclage at a single academic medical center. Cervical softness was measured using a noninvasive, aspiration-based device placed on the anterior lip of the cervix during a speculum examination. The device measured the aspiration pressure required to displace cervical tissue to a predefined deformation level. Stiff tissue required increased aspiration pressure, whereas soft tissue required lower pressure values. Cerclage patients were subdivided into 3 groups, namely history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, and examination-indicated cerclage. Controls were healthy volunteers between 12+0 weeks and 23+6 weeks of gestation without a history of cervical insufficiency and were matched by gestational age to the patients in the cerclage groups. Women with a cerclage in place, multiple gestations, active genital infection, or previous cervical excision procedures were excluded. Delivery information was subsequently recorded as well.

RESULTS

Data from 133 women were analyzed; of those, 54 patients were in the cerclage group (23 history-indicated, 12 ultrasound-indicated, and 19 examination-indicated participants) and 79 were controls (40 in the first trimester and 39 in the second trimester groups). Patients who presented for ultrasound-indicated cerclage had significantly softer cervices (median; interquartile range) than second trimester controls (62 mbar; 50.5-114 vs 81 mbar; 75-101; P=.042). The difference in cervical softness was not significantly different between the history-indicated and examination-indicated cerclage groups and their respective control groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting for ultrasound-indicated cerclage had significantly softer cervices than normal controls as measured by an aspiration-based device. Quantitative measurement of cervical softness with the aspiration-based device is a promising technique for objective measurement of cervical softness during pregnancy.

Relationship of Amniotic Fluid Sludge and Short Cervix With a High Rate of Preterm Birth in Women After Cervical Cerclage

OBJECTIVE

We aims to determine the relationship of amniotic fluid sludge (AFS) and/or short cervical length (CL, ≤25 mm) with a high rate of preterm birth in women after cervical cerclage.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among singleton pregnancies after cervical cerclage between January 2018 and December 2021. A total of 296 patients who underwent transvaginal ultrasound to evaluate CL and the presence of AFS within 2 weeks after cerclage were included. Pregnancy outcome after cerclage was analyzed in accordance with the presence of AFS and CL ≤25 mm.

RESULTS

In patients with cerclage, AFS was an independent risk factor for preterm birth at <28 and <36 weeks but not for preterm birth at <32 weeks, and CL ≤25 mm was an independent risk factor for preterm birth at <28, <32, and <36 weeks. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the association between the presence of AFS and short gestational age at delivery was statistically significant in women with CL ≤25 mm (log rank test, P = .000). The Cox regression analysis showed that these results remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors (P = .000). The negative linear relationships between AFS and CL (R = -0.454, P < .001) also explained the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

AFS and short cervix have a direct effect on pregnancies after cerclage. Mid-trimester AFS can become a supplementary ultrasound index for detecting preterm birth after cerclage in pregnant women with a short cervix.

Prognosis and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Emergent Cerclage: A Japanese Single-Center Study

Objectives

The aims of this study were to clarify the following: (1) how often does prolonged pregnancy ≥34 weeks occur in patients with emergent cerclage without progesterone and (2) the risk factors preventing such pregnancy continuation.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective observational study was performed using medical records of patients for whom emergent cerclage had been performed between April 2006 and December 2018 in our institute.

Results

Emergent cerclage was performed in 123 patients (median age: 34, interquartile range: 31–36). Primiparous patients numbered 44 (36%). A history of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) was present in 30 (24%). The median presurgical cervical length (CL) was 16 (8–21) mm at surgery. Of the 123, 20 (16%) were delivered at 33 + 6 weeks or less (<34 weeks). We conducted logistic regression analysis of the risk factors of SPTBs <34 weeks after cerclage. Three risk factors were identified that increased the risk of SPTB <34 weeks: presurgical CL 0 mm (odds ratio (OR): 5.30; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58–17.7), a history of SPTB (OR: 4.65; 95% CI: 1.38–15.7), and the presence of sludge (OR: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.20–14.3).

Conclusion

Three risk factors predicted SPTB <34 weeks after emergency cerclage without progesterone administration: unmeasurable CL (CL 0 mm), a history of SPTB, and the presence of sludge on ultrasound. SPTB <34 weeks occurred after emergency cerclage in 16% of patients, being comparable with the recent data with progesterone.

Longitudinal assessment of obstetrics and gynecology resident perceptions and comfort following cerclage placement simulation

BACKGROUND

Utilization of simulation training in medical education has increased over time, particularly for less common scenarios and procedures. Simulation allows trainees to practice in a low-stress environment and eliminates patient risk. Cerclage placement has become less frequent, which limits obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) exposure to cerclage placement during training. This exposes an area of training requiring simulation in OB/GYN resident education.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate resident reception to cerclage simulation, their self-reported comfort with and ability to troubleshoot difficult cerclage placement immediately and 12 months following didactic education and simulation.

METHODS

In 2019, 18/20 (90%) OB/GYN residents in our university program underwent didactic teaching and simulation in cerclage placement using a pelvic model with removable cervix. Residents completed a survey immediately and 12 months following simulation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze resident self-report of comfort with cerclage placement and skill techniques for navigating difficult placement before and after simulation training. Descriptive statistics were analyzed as means and standard deviations.

RESULTS

Eighteen of twenty (90%) residents participated in the education session in cerclage placement. All 18 (100%) completed a postsimulation survey and 17/18 (94%) completed a survey 12 months later. All reported improved comfort with cerclage placement and statistically significant improvement in knowledge on techniques for troubleshooting difficult placement after simulation. All residents reported that the simulation enhanced their learning and recommended the simulation for future educational opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerclage simulation was well-received by OB/GYN residents in learning and practicing cerclage placement. Residents demonstrated improved comfort with placement following simulation.

A modified transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage with the monofilament thread: Its efficacy and safety for women with extremely short cervix due to cervical conization

AIM

The study aimed to examine the usefulness of modified transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage (TAC) using monofilament thread for the prevention of preterm delivery in women with an extremely short cervix after deep conization.

METHODS

We devised a monofilament thread for picking up the seromuscular layer of the site that is slightly cephalad to the internal ostium to prevent injury of the vessels around the uterine cervix. From 2017 to 2020, we performed this modified operation in eight women (nine pregnancies) at 12-16 weeks of gestation with a history of deep cervical conization.

RESULTS

A modified TAC was successfully performed in all patients. There was no measurable bleeding, and all patients were discharged without postoperative complications. Their pregnancy courses after the operation were uneventful. Of nine, one patient had premature uterine contractions and underwent cesarean section at 36 weeks (preterm delivery). In the other eight pregnancies, planned cesarean section was performed after 37 weeks of gestation. The median birth weight of the babies was 2996 g (range 2604-3374 g). All patients were discharged on the sixth postoperative day without complications.

CONCLUSION

A modified TAC can be safely performed and may prolong pregnancy without adverse events in patients with an extremely short cervix.

Cervical length distribution and other sonographic ancillary findings of singleton nulliparous patients at midgestation

BACKGROUND

Short cervix at midgestation, the presence of intraamniotic debris, and cervical funneling are risk factors for preterm birth; however, cervical length measurements and cutoffs are not well documented among pregnant patients of different gestational ages and self-reported races and ethnicities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the distribution of cervical length and frequency of funneling and debris at midgestation in nulliparous women by gestational age and race/ethnicity.

STUDY DESIGN

This secondary analysis of screening data from a multicenter treatment trial of singleton nulliparous patients with short cervix was conducted at 14 geographically distributed, university-affiliated medical centers in the United States. Singleton nulliparous patients with no known risk factors for preterm birth were screened for trial participation and asked to undergo a transvaginal ultrasound to measure cervical length by a certified sonographer. The distribution of cervical length and the frequency of funneling and debris were assessed for each gestational age week (16-22 weeks) and stratified by self-reported race and ethnicity, which for this study were categorized as White, Black, Hispanic, and other. Patients enrolled in the randomized trial were excluded from this analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12,407 nulliparous patients were included in this analysis. The racial or ethnic distribution of the study participants was as follows: White, 41.6%; Black, 29.6%; Hispanic, 24.2%; and others, 4.6%. The 10th percentile cervical length for the entire cohort was 31.1 mm and, when stratified by race and ethnicity, 31.9 mm for White, 30.2 mm for Black, 31.4 mm for Hispanic, and 31.2 mm for patients of other race and ethnicity (P<.001). At each gestational age, the cervical length corresponding to the tenth percentile was shorter in Black patients. The 25 mm value commonly used to define a short cervix and thought to represent the 10th percentile ranged from 1.3% to 5.4% across gestational age weeks and 1.0% to 3.8% across race and ethnicity groups. Black patients had the highest rate of funneling (2.6%), whereas Hispanic and Black patients had higher rates of intraamniotic debris than White and other patients (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Black patients had shorter cervical length and higher rates of debris and funneling than White patients. The racial and ethnic disparities in sonographic midtrimester cervical findings may provide insight into the racial disparity in preterm birth rates in the United States.

"Does the use of gestation-specific centiles for cervical length change the management of pregnancies at risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth?"

INTRODUCTION

Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Spontaneous Preterm Birth (sPTB) has many and varied causes but is known to be strongly associated with a short or shortening cervix in the midtrimester of pregnancy. The strongest risk factor for sPTB is a previous sPTB. In women with a history of sPTB, we can offer surveillance and treatments which have been proven to reduce the risk of sPTB, such as cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone supplementation. Alongside other indications, we currently use 25 mm or shorter as a "trigger threshold" for offering cervical cerclage treatment in the Preterm Birth Prevention Clinic at The National Maternity Hospital.

AIM

To determine if using gestation-specific centiles instead of a 25 mm cut-off for cervical length changes the antenatal management of women at high risk of sPTB.

METHOD

This was a retrospective chart review of all women attending the preterm birth clinic over the 2-year period 2018-2020 in a large tertiary referral unit in Dublin, Ireland. Demographic details, obstetric history, preterm birth risk factors and preventative treatments offered were collected and analysed. Cervical lengths were measured with ultrasound using a standardised protocol and all performed or supervised by 2 experienced sonographers.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with known risk factors for sPTB attended the Preterm Birth Surveillance Clinic at the National Maternity Hospital during the study period. Of these, 36/200 (18%) went on to deliver again prior to 37 weeks despite attending the clinic +/- receiving interventions & this group are the focus of this paper. The indications for surveillance in this group that had a recurrent sPTB included recurrent second-trimester pregnancy losses/preterm delivery < 34 weeks (26/36 (72%)), cervical trauma (including treatment of CIN) (12/36 (33%)), congenital abnormalities (1/36 (2.8%)), uterine anomaly (1/36 (2.8%)) and placental bleeding (1/36 (2.8%)). There was one smoker in this series. Funnelling was observed in 3/36 cases (8.3%). Of the 36 patients, an additional 15 would have received a cerclage had gestation-specific centiles, i.e., <5th centile, been used and an additional 10/36 (28%) would have been offered progesterone therapy.

CONCLUSION

In those at high risk of preterm birth, the use of gestation-specific centiles for cervical length increases the proportion of patients that would be eligible for cervical cerclage. It is unclear whether this would change clinical outcome.

Guideline No. 401: Sonographic Cervical Length in Singleton Pregnancies: Techniques and Clinical Applications

OBJECTIVES

• To assess the association between sonography-derived cervical length measurement and preterm birth. • To describe the various techniques to measure cervical length using sonography. • To review the natural history of the short cervix. • To review the clinical uses, predictive ability, and utility of sonography-measured short cervix.

OUTCOMES

Reduction in rates of prematurity and/or better identification of those at risk, as well as possible prevention of unnecessary interventions.

INTENDED USERS

Clinicians involved in the obstetrical management or cervical imaging of patients at increased risk of a short cervix.

TARGET POPULATION

Women at increased risk of a short cervix or at risk of preterm birth.

EVIDENCE

Literature published up to June 2019 was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (preterm labour, ultrasound, cervix, cervical insufficiency, transvaginal, transperineal, cervical length, fibronectin). Results were restricted to general and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The evidence and this guideline were reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the recommendations were made and graded according to the rankings of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Online Appendix Table A1).

BENEFITS, HARMS, COSTS

Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Use of the sonographic technique reviewed in this guideline may help identify women at risk of preterm birth and, in some circumstances, lead to interventions that may reduce the rate of preterm birth. SUMMARY STATEMENTS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES): RECOMMENDATIONS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES).

Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic high-risk women with a normal cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth (PTB) is estimated to affect 14.9 million babies globally every year. Global rates of PTB continue to increase from 9.8 to 10.6% over a 15-year period from 2000 to 2014. Vaginal progesterone is commonly used by clinicians as a prevention strategy, with recent evidence affirming the benefit of vaginal (micronised) progesterone to prevent PTB in women with a shortened cervix (< 25 mm). Given the low incidence of a short cervix at mid-gestation in high-risk populations further evidence is required. The objective of this review is to determine if vaginal progesterone reduces spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) before 37 weeks in asymptomatic high-risk women with a singleton pregnancy with a normal mid-gestation cervical length.

METHODS

Studies will be sourced from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception onwards with the search terms 'progesterone' and 'preterm birth'. Studies will be screened and included if they assess vaginal progesterone compared to placebo in women with a normal cervical length. The primary outcome will be sPTB < 37 weeks, with secondary outcomes of sPTB < 34 weeks. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening at abstract and full text level, data extraction and risk of bias assessment with disagreements resolved by an experienced researcher. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects analysis model will be used to produce treatment effect odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

DISCUSSION

This review will assess the current body of evidence and provide clarity regarding the potential benefits and best practice of use of vaginal progesterone in asymptomatic women with high-risk singleton pregnancies and normal cervical length.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020152051.

Prevention of preterm delivery by cervical cerclage; a comparison of prophylactic and emergency procedures

Objective:

Prophylactic or emergency type cervical cerclage procedures are being used for treatment of cervical insufficiency. The aim was to review and compare the outcomes of these cerclage types and identify factors affecting outcomes.

Material and Methods:

Retrospective review of seventy-five patients in whom transvaginal cervical cerclage procedures were performed over a seven-year period in a tertiary referral center.

Results:

Twenty seven of 75 (36%) patients were in the emergency cerclage group and 48 (64%) of them were in the prophylactic group. Mean body mass index (BMI), hospitalization time and gestational week at cerclage were significantly higher, whereas latency period was significantly shorter for the emergency group. Mean gestational ages at delivery were 35.6±4.5 and 33.6±5.9 weeks in the prophylactic and emergency groups, respectively (p=0.117). Delivery rates under 34^th gestational week were 20.8% and 37.0% in the prophylactic and emergency groups, respectively (p=0.175). Birthweight, and delivery ≥34^th gestational week was higher in the prophylactic group, whereas complication rate was higher in the emergency group, but these differences were not significant. High BMI was associated with more deliveries before 34-week in the prophylactic group. Pre-cerclage cervical length was shorter in patients who delivered before 34 gestational weeks at delivery.

Conclusion:

Prophylactic and emergency cerclage procedures have comparable results regarding gestational week at delivery. High BMI and low pre-cerclage cervical length may have adverse effects on success of cerclage procedures.

Cervical insufficiency: a noteworthy disease with controversies

Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a mainly disease leading to recurrent abortions and preterm birth which may present in about 1% of obstetric populations. Recurrent pregnancy losses caused by CI incur serious economic burdens on society as well as huge psychological burdens to family members. However, many patients even clinicians in some areas of the world still remain confused about this disease. At the same time, the etiology of CI is still uncertain and it is still a controversial disease in diagnosis and treatment. This article summarizes the potential risk factors associated with CI, which could be worthy of attention and helpful for future research. It also reviews the methods for diagnosis and treatment of CI to better understand this noteworthy disease, as well as presents the related consensus and controversies according to the newly updated guidelines, which has practical significance for conducting more in-depth investigations in the future.

Very short cervix in low-risk asymptomatic singleton pregnancies: Outcome according to treatment and cervical length at diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the outcome of low-risk singleton pregnancies with very short cervical length (CL ≤15 mm) according to method of treatment and CL at diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study on singleton pregnancies devoid of risk factors for spontaneous preterm delivery identified in the course of universal screening programs by vaginal sonography at 20-24 weeks of gestation to have very short CL ≤ 15 mm.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 233 pregnancies with CL ≤ 15 mm of which 88 had cervical cerclage inserted and the remaining 145 were treated with vaginal progesterone. Mean CL at diagnosis was significantly shorter in the cerclage group (5 mm) compared with the progesterone group (12 mm). Regardless of treatment there was no difference in the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation in women with CL ≥ 9 mm at screening (11% and 12% in the cerclage and progesterone groups, respectively). In contrast, in the subgroup with CL ≤ 8 mm cervical cerclage resulted in significantly lower rates of spontaneous preterm delivery at <32 weeks of gestation compared with progesterone treatment (20% and 45%, respectively, P = .009) and the median gestational age at birth was significantly greater (37 weeks vs 36 weeks, respectively, P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies with short CL will remain undelivered until 32 weeks of gestation whether treated with progesterone or cerclage. Women with extreme cervical shortening appear to benefit more from cervical cerclage.

Trends in preterm birth: an academic center's campaign to reduce the incidence

Objective: To evaluate if the implementation of five protocols aimed at reducing the preterm birth rate were associated with a decrease in incidence of PTBs at an academic center.Methods: This is an observational study of women with singleton gestations delivered at TJUH between 2004 and 2014. Primary outcome was the annual incidence of PTB <37 weeks at TJUH. Secondary outcome was the rate of change for PTBs at TJUH compared against that of the nation. Linear regression, Pearson correlation coefficients, and t-tests were used to analyze preterm birth rates over time.Results: TJUH incidence of PTB < 37 weeks significantly decreased from 10.8% (n = 206) in 2004 to 9.1% (n = 169) in 2014 (p = .001). Linear regression showed a dramatically greater rate of decline at TJUH (0.32% per year, p = .001) compared to that of the USA (0.14% per year, p < .0001). Early PTBs (28-33 6/7 week) at TJUH had the steepest rate of decline at 0.13% per year (p = .001). Late PTBs (34-36 6/7 week) at TJUH were the only group to not have a significant rate of decline (p = .114).Conclusion: The incidence of PTBs at TJUH decreased more than the USA national average in the study period, which may be due to early adoption of guidelines for prevention of PTB.Condensation: The incidence of PTBs at TJUH decreased more than the USA national average in the study period, which may be due to early adoption of guidelines for prevention of PTB.

Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, February 2019) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Etiology, Prediction, Primary and Secondary Prevention of Preterm Birth

Aims This is an official guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline is to improve the prediction, prevention and management of preterm birth based on evidence obtained from recent scientific literature, the experience of the members of the guideline commission and the views of self-help groups. Methods Based on the international literature, the members of the participating medical societies and organizations developed Recommendations and Statements. These were adopted following a formal process (structured consensus conference with neutral moderation, voting was done in writing using the Delphi method to achieve consensus). Recommendations Part I of this short version of the guideline lists Statements and Recommendations on the epidemiology, etiology, prediction and primary and secondary prevention of preterm birth.

Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis

Background The frequency of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (IAI/I) in patients with midtrimester cervical insufficiency is up to 50%. Our purpose was to determine the perinatal outcomes of cervical cerclage in patients with acute cervical insufficiency with bulging membranes, and to compare the admission-to-delivery interval and pregnancy outcomes according to the results of amniotic fluid (AF) analysis and cerclage placement. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including singleton pregnancies with cervical insufficiency between 15 and 26.9 weeks in two tertiary health centers. IAI/I was defined when at least one of the following criteria was present in AF: (a) a white blood cell (WBC) count >50 cells/mm3; (b) glucose concentration <14 mg/dL; and/or (c) a Gram stain positive for bacteria. Three different groups were compared: (1) absence of IAI/I with placement of a cerclage; (2) amniocentesis not performed with placement of a cerclage; and (3) IAI/I with or without a cerclage. Results Seventy patients underwent an amniocentesis to rule out IAI/I. The prevalence of IAI/I was 19%. Forty-seven patients underwent a cerclage. Patients with a cerclage had a longer median admission-to-delivery interval (33 vs. 2 days; P < 0.001) and delivered at a higher median gestational age (27.4 vs. 22.6 weeks; P = 0.001) than those without a cerclage. The neonatal survival rate in the cerclage group was 62% vs. 23% in those without a cerclage (P = 0.01). Patients without IAI/I who underwent a cerclage had a longer median admission-to-delivery interval (43 vs. 1 day; P < 0.001), delivered at a higher median gestational age (28 vs. 22.1 weeks; P = 0.001) and had a higher neonatal survival rate (67% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) than those with IAI/I. Conclusion The pregnancy outcomes of patients with midtrimester cervical insufficiency and bulging membranes are poor as they have a high prevalence of IAI/I. Therefore, a pre-operative amniocentesis is key to identify the best candidates for the subsequent placement of a cerclage.

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound cervical length

Objectives: To determine intraobserver and interobserver variability in the measurement of different cervical length (CL) components at the first trimester (endocervical canal and isthmus), describe the optimum measurement method (single line or two lines) and establish a normality curve of first trimester CL in our population.Methods: Women who attended the first-trimester US scan, between 11.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation at Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain were included. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies in women over 18 years of age, no gestational complications, uterine malformations or uterine surgery. Lengths of the endocervical canal and uterine isthmus were measured using two methods.Results: Both methods for endocervical canal measurement, single line and two lines, showed low intraobserver variability between examiners, with no statistical differences in the majority of measurements. A correct correlation existed between examiners using the single-line two-line measurements, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.76.Conclusions: Cervical length in the first trimester was reproducible for the same physician and between different physicians; however, it is essential to ensure examiners receive adequate training in the technique.

Current options for mechanical prevention of preterm birth

Cervical insufficiency can be defined by a combination of obstetric history, cervical dilation on exam, and/or short cervical length in women with prior preterm birth. Options for mechanical intervention include cerclage and pessary. There is evidence to support the benefit of a cervical cerclage in women with singleton gestations who have a diagnosis of cervical insufficiency either based on second trimester painless cervical dilatation leading to recurrent early preterm births, or a history of early spontaneous preterm birth and a second trimester transvaginal ultrasound short cervical length or cervical dilation on exam. For women with multiple gestations, the benefit of a cerclage is uncertain, and further study is warranted. The pessary has also been studied for mechanical prevention of preterm birth in various populations, however the results so far have been mixed and warrants further study prior to routine use.

The cytokine network in women with an asymptomatic short cervix and the risk of preterm delivery

PROBLEM

To characterize the amniotic fluid (AF) inflammatory-related protein (IRP) network in patients with a sonographic short cervix (SCx) and to determine its relation to early preterm delivery (ePTD).

METHOD OF STUDY

A retrospective cohort study included women with a SCx (≤25 mm; n=223) who had amniocentesis and were classified according to gestational age (GA) at diagnosis and delivery (ePTD <32 weeks of gestation).

RESULTS

(i) In women with a SCx ≤ 22 1/7 weeks, the concentration of most IRPs increased as the cervix shortened; those with ePTD had a higher rate of increase in MIP-1α, MCP-1, and IL-6 concentrations than those delivering later; and (ii) the concentration of most IRPs and the correlation between several IRP pairs were higher in the ePTD group than for those delivering later.

CONCLUSION

Women with a SCx at 16-22 1/7 weeks have a unique AF cytokine network that correlates with cervical length at diagnosis and GA at delivery. This network may aid in predicting ePTD.

Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Cervical cerclage is a well-known surgical procedure carried out during pregnancy. It involves positioning of a suture (stitch) around the neck of the womb (cervix), aiming to give mechanical support to the cervix and thereby reduce risk of preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of this procedure remains controversial. This is an update of a review last published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the use of cervical stitch in singleton pregnancy at high risk of pregnancy loss based on woman's history and/or ultrasound finding of 'short cervix' and/or physical exam improves subsequent obstetric care and fetal outcome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (30 June 2016) and reference lists of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials of cervical suturing in singleton pregnancies. Cervical stitch was carried out when the pregnancy was considered to be of sufficiently high risk due to a woman's history, a finding of short cervix on ultrasound or other indication determined by physical exam. We included any study that compared cerclage with either no treatment or any alternative intervention. We planned to include cluster-randomised studies but not cross-over trials. We excluded quasi-randomised studies. We included studies reported in abstract form only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We resolved discrepancies by discussion. Data were checked for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

This updated review includes a total of 15 trials (3490 women); three trials were added for this update (152 women). Cerclage versus no cerclageOverall, cerclage probably leads to a reduced risk of perinatal death when compared with no cerclage, although the confidence interval (CI) crosses the line of no effect (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.04; 10 studies, 2927 women; moderate quality evidence). Considering stillbirths and neonatal deaths separately reduced the numbers of events and sample size. Although the relative effect of cerclage is similar, estimates were less reliable with fewer data and assessed as of low quality (stillbirths RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.75; 5 studies, 1803 women; low quality evidence; neonatal deaths before discharge RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.39; 6 studies, 1714 women; low quality evidence). Serious neonatal morbidity was similar with and without cerclage (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.18; 6 studies, 883 women; low-quality evidence). Pregnant women with and without cerclage were equally likely to have a baby discharged home healthy (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.06; 4 studies, 657 women; moderate quality evidence).Pregnant women with cerclage were less likely to have preterm births compared to controls before 37, 34 (average RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89; 9 studies, 2415 women; high quality evidence) and 28 completed weeks of gestation.Five subgroups based on clinical indication provided data for analysis (history-indicated; short cervix based on one-off ultrasound in high risk women; short cervix found by serial scans in high risk women; physical exam-indicated; and short cervix found on scan in low risk or mixed populations). There were too few trials in these clinical subgroups to make meaningful conclusions and no evidence of differential effects. Cerclage versus progesteroneTwo trials (129 women) compared cerclage to prevention with vaginal progesterone in high risk women with short cervix on ultrasound; these trials were too small to detect reliable, clinically important differences for any review outcome. One included trial compared cerclage with intramuscular progesterone (75 women) which lacked power to detect group differences. History indicated cerclage versus ultrasound indicated cerclageEvidence from two trials (344 women) was too limited to establish differences for clinically important outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Cervical cerclage reduces the risk of preterm birth in women at high-risk of preterm birth and probably reduces risk of perinatal deaths. There was no evidence of any differential effect of cerclage based on previous obstetric history or short cervix indications, but data were limited for all clinical groups. The question of whether cerclage is more or less effective than other preventative treatments, particularly vaginal progesterone, remains unanswered.

The role of predictive vaginal biomarkers in women with cervical cerclage

Cervical cerclage is currently one of the primary methods of treatment for cervical insufficiency (CI). Identifying methods in order to selectively apply cerclage may allow us to further limit unnecessary procedures. In this regard, a limited number of inflammatory and extracellular matrix biomarkers measurable non-invasively at the level of the cervix have been examined. In this review we summarize the current research on the use of cervical biomarkers in predicting cerclage failure and propose potential objectives for future research.

Effectiveness of elective cervical cerclage according to obstetric history

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of elective history-indicated cervical cerclage according to obstetrical history.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed pregnancy outcome of a retrospective cohort of women who have had history-indicated McDonald's cerclage. Principal outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery.

RESULT

Between January 2003 and December 2013, 205 women were included. We analyzed population in two risk groups: 1- Low-risk (≤2 prior preterm birth (PTB)/second trimester loss (STL), or prior success of cerclage), 2- High risk (≥3 prior PTB/STL, or prior failure of cerclage). In the high-risk group, there was a higher frequency of deliveries before 37 weeks (47.5% vs. 24.5%, P=0.001, OR=2.79, 95% CI [1.49-5.23]). Fifty percent of women (n=6/12) delivered before 37 weeks in case of three or more prior PTB/STL, and 51% (n=24/47) in case of prior failure of cervical cerclage.

CONCLUSION

Elective cervical cerclage may be indicated for women with≤2 prior PTB/STL, or prior successful cerclage. For women with≥3 prior PTB/STL, trachelorraphy or cervico-isthmic cerclage could be possible alternatives to cervical cerclage.

Vaginal Cerclage: Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Management

The role of the cerclage procedure has expanded from its initial application as treatment or prevention of cervical insufficiency to prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. Although recent prospective studies have clarified the indications for cerclage, additional prospective studies are needed to help define optimal perioperative management. Herein, we review the current data to provide the clinician with the most evidence-based approach to managing patients who require cerclage.

The prevalence of short cervix between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation and vaginal progesterone for prolonging of gestation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to understand the prevalence of short cervical length between 20 and 24 weeks gestation in China and to evaluate the efficacy of micronized progesterone for prolonging gestation in nulliparous patients with a short cervix.

METHODS

From May 2010 to May 2015, a total of 25 328 asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies at Peking University First Hospital had their cervical length routinely measured between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation. A cervical length of 25 mm or less was defined as a shortened cervical length. The therapies prescribed include vaginal micronized progesterone capsules (200 mg each night) or bed rest from 20 to 34 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was spontaneous delivery before 33 weeks.

RESULTS

(1) One hundred fourteen women had a cervical length of ≤25 mm (0.45%). (2) Twenty-nine of which with previous spontaneous preterm delivery or late pregnancy loss had cervical cerclage, the remaining 85 women by the use of vaginal progesterone or simply resting activity restriction to prevent preterm birth. (3) In 85 nulliparous women treated by progesterone or bed rest, progesterone use in cervical length between 10 and 20 mm was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of preterm birth at <33 weeks of gestation (9.5% versus 45.5%, p = 0.02) compared with bed rest. There were no significant differences in cervical length between 20 and 25 mm in their rates of spontaneous preterm delivery at <33 (5.3% versus 3.2%, p = 0.72), <37 (33.3% versus 54.5%, p = 0.25), or <35 weeks (14.3% versus 45.5, p = 0.06) of gestation between vaginal progesterone and bed rest.

CONCLUSION

The rate of short cervical length was less than expected. Vaginal progesterone is efficacious for the prolonging of gestation in women with a cervical length of 10-20 mm in the mid-trimester for a singleton gestation and nulliparous women. For a cervical length of 20-25 mm in the mid trimester, vaginal progesterone compared with bed rest did not prolong pregnancy.

The predictive value of sequential cervical length screening in singleton pregnancies after cerclage: a retrospective cohort study

Background

There are few valid predictors for preterm delivery after cerclage. Experience with a screening program that included four sequential cervical length measurements in singleton pregnancies after cerclage is reviewed.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 88 singleton pregnancies after cerclage were included. Cervical length (CL) measurements were performed perioperatively and at weeks 16 + 0, 18 + 0, 20 + 0, and 22 + 0 by transvaginal ultrasound. Predictive factors for early preterm delivery included patient characteristics, obstetric history and CL measurements and were analyzed separately for women with ultrasound-indicated cerclage and those with history-indicated cerclage. Women with emergency cerclage were excluded.

Results

In women with delivery <35 weeks, CL declined from the 16 + 0 to the 22 + 0 weeks of gestation (p = 0.009). In univariate analysis, all CL measurements were predictive for delivery <35 weeks in women who underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage and in women who received a history-indicated cerclage, whereas in multivariate analysis only CL three to six days after cerclage remained significant (odds ratio 0.85, 95 % CI 0.73–0.98). In women with ultrasound-indicated cerclage, optimized cut-off was ≤20 mm (specificity 83.8 %, sensitivity 84.2 %).

Conclusions

CL measured three to six days after cerclage placement provides the best information about the risk for delivery <35 weeks.

Does the clinical presentation of a prior preterm birth predict risk in a subsequent pregnancy?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether risk of recurrent preterm birth differs based on the clinical presentation of a prior spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB): advanced cervical dilatation (ACD), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), or preterm labor (PTL).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies from 2009 to 2014 complicated by a history of prior SPTB. Women were categorized based on the clinical presentation of their prior preterm delivery as having ACD, PPROM, or PTL. Risks for sonographic short cervical length and recurrent SPTB were compared between women based on the clinical presentation of their prior preterm birth. Log-linear regression was used to control for confounders.

RESULTS

Of 522 patients included in this study, 96 (18.4%) had prior ACD, 246 (47.1%) had prior PPROM, and 180 (34.5%) had prior PTL. Recurrent PTB occurred in 55.2% of patients with a history of ACD compared with 27.2% of those with PPROM and 32.2% with PTL (P = .001). The mean gestational age at delivery was significantly lower for those with a history of ACD (34.0 weeks) compared with women with prior PPROM (37.2 weeks) or PTL (37.0 weeks) (P = .001). The lowest mean cervical length prior to 24 weeks was significantly shorter in patients with a history of advanced cervical dilation when compared with the other clinical presentations.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of ACD are at an increased risk of having recurrent preterm birth and cervical shortening in a subsequent pregnancy compared with women with prior preterm birth associated PPROM or PTL.

Sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in asymptomatic patients with a sonographic short cervix: prevalence and clinical significance

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and clinical significance of sterile and microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in asymptomatic patients with a sonographic short cervix.

METHODS

Amniotic fluid (AF) samples obtained by transabdominal amniocentesis from 231 asymptomatic women with a sonographic short cervix [cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm] were analyzed using cultivation techniques (for aerobic and anaerobic as well as genital mycoplasmas) and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS). The frequency and magnitude of intra-amniotic inflammation [defined as an AF interleukin (IL)-6 concentration ≥2.6 ng/mL], acute histologic placental inflammation, spontaneous preterm delivery (sPTD), and the amniocentesis-to-delivery interval were examined according to the results of AF cultures, PCR/ESI-MS and AF IL-6 concentrations.

RESULTS

Ten percent (24/231) of patients with a sonographic short cervix had sterile intra-amniotic inflammation (an elevated AF IL-6 concentration without evidence of microorganisms using cultivation and molecular methods). Sterile intra-amniotic inflammation was significantly more frequent than microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation [10.4% (24/231) versus 2.2% (5/231); p < 0.001]. Patients with sterile intra-amniotic inflammation had a significantly higher rate of sPTD <34 weeks of gestation [70.8% (17/24) versus 31.6% (55/174); p < 0.001] and a significantly shorter amniocentesis-to-delivery interval than patients without intra-amniotic inflammation [median 35, (IQR: 10-70) versus median 71, (IQR: 47-98) days, (p < 0.0001)].

CONCLUSION

Sterile intra-amniotic inflammation is more common than microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in asymptomatic women with a sonographic short cervix, and is associated with increased risk of sPTD (<34 weeks). Further investigation is required to determine the causes of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation and the mechanisms whereby this condition is associated with a short cervix and sPTD.