Treatment of Post-Traumatic Femoral Discrepancy With PRECICE Magnetic-Powered Intramedullary Lengthening Nails

PRECICE nail for the management of posttraumatic bone defects with nonunion or malunion: Experience from a Latin American center

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical outcomes using the PRECICE magnetic limb lengthening intramedullary nail for the correction of lower limb length discrepancies (LLD) in adults with posttraumatic nonunion or malunion defects in a Latin American center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 25 adult patients with LLD associated with posttraumatic nonunion or malunion defects of femur or tibia treated with the PRECICE nail between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes considered were lengthening length achieved in mm, incidence of complications and quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire).

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases (20 femoral and 5 tibial nails) were performed, with a median follow-up of 27 months (Interquartile range-IQR: 17.5 to 34.5). The average age was 36.5 ± 12.9 years; 10 cases were women. Fifteen cases had an LLD secondary to a malunion defect and 10 cases had an LLD secondary to a nonunion. PRECICE nails were inserted for the treatment of a median LLD of 40.0 mm (IQR: 30.2 to 74.2) in the femur and 30.0 mm (28.5 to 50.0) in the tibia. An accuracy of 100% was reported in 18 cases (Femur: 14 and tibia: 4) and consolidation was achieved in 22/25 cases with the PRECICE nail in situ. Complications were recorded in 9 (36%) cases (6/20 femur, 3/5 tibia), mainly related to the consolidation process (5/9). The median EQ-5D and EQ-VAS were 0.79 (IQR: 0.63 to 0.79) and 80.0 (IQR: 50.0 to 90.0), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that the PRECICE nail is an effective device for the management of posttraumatic LLD during the treatment of nonunion or malunion bone defects of femur and tibia, offering a reasonable quality of life, despite its postoperative complication risk.

Lengthening Patients Previously Treated for Massive Lower Limb Reconstruction for Bone Tumors with the PRECICE 2 Nail

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of the PRECICE 2® nail in the treatment of lower limb length discrepancy in patients with a history of bone tumors. This study reports on outcomes, complications, and the safety of the PRECICE 2 limb lengthening nail in a cohort of pediatric patients with limb length discrepancy after surgery for bone tumors. Seventeen patients were treated with intramedullary magnetic nails. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 19 (range 11-32). The PRECICE 2 nail was used on 14 femurs (6 retrograde and 8 anterograde) and 3 tibias. The average consolidation time was 141 days (range 50-360) with a mean CI of 31 ± 12 days/cm. The ASAMI bone score showed 14 (82%) excellent results, 1 (6%) good result, and 2 (12%) poor results. The ASAMI functional score showed 13 (84.6%) excellent results, 3 (11.5%) good results, and 1 (3.8%) fair result. Patients treated with chemotherapy for bone cancer did not show any increase in distraction time or consolidation time. A total of 3 (17%) problems, 1 obstacle (5.5%), and 1 complication (5.5%) were encountered in our case series. The PRECICE 2 nail allows for effective and accurate lengthening preserving the range of motion in patients treated for bone tumors.

Trends and Practices in Limb Lengthening: An 11-year US Database Study

Aim

Over the past couple of decades, limb lengthening has evolved to encompass various implants and techniques. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine trends in the utilisation of various limb lengthening techniques for the femur and tibia in the United States, (2) determine trends in 1-year readmission rate following limb lengthening procedures and (3) to study the relationship of limb lengthening implant used and payment method used with the underlying diagnosis associated with limb shortening.

Materials and methods

Inpatient data were acquired using the Healthcare Cost and Utilisation Project (HCUP) database from 2005 to 2015 from seven states in the United States. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code for limb lengthening of the femur or tibia were included. A total of 2,563 patients were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and chi-square test was used for comparison of subcategories. Linear regression analysis was used to examine trends over time.

Results

There was a strong linear trend towards increasing proportional use of internal lengthening of the femur from 2011 to 2015 (R2 = 0.99) with an increase of 10.2% per year. A similar trend towards increasing proportional use of internal lengthening of the tibia was seen from 2011 to 2015 (R2 = 0.87) with an increase of 4.9% per year. There was a moderate correlation showing a decrease in readmission rate of 1.07% per year from 2005 to 2015 (R2 = 0.55). Patients with short stature had increased use of internal lengthening and self-payment compared to patients with congenital, post-traumatic or other diagnoses.

Conclusion

There was increasing use of internal lengthening techniques from 2011 to 2015. Patients with short stature had higher use of internal lengthening technique and self-pay for payment method.

Clinical significance

Intramedullary devices have seen increasing use for limb lengthening procedures. Lengthening technique and payment method may differ by underlying diagnosis.

How to cite this article

Mittal A, Allahabadi S, Jayaram R, et al. Trends and Practices in Limb Lengthening: An 11-year US Database Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(1):21-31.

STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for femoral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. The titanium version of the MILN (PRECICE®) has been in use since 2011 but had limitations (50-75 lb) in post-operative weight bearing. A new stainless-steel version of the MILN (STRYDE®) allows 150-250 lb of post-operative weight bearing. The aim is to compare the outcomes of using these two different MILNs for both unilateral and bilateral femoral lengthening.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in which patients' records were reviewed from the period from January 2017 to March 2020. A total of 66 femoral lengthening procedures were included in the study and were divided into two groups: STRYDE® group (30 femora) and PRECICE® group (36 femora). Outcomes assessed were the 6-months post-operative Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) Score, adjacent joint range of motion (ROM), average distraction rate, bone healing index (BHI), and complications.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to the (LD-SRS) score, hip ROM, or knee ROM. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to BHI (average of 0.84 months/cm and 0.67 months/cm for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively) and distraction rate (average of 0.6 mm/day and 0.9 mm/day for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively). No mechanical nail complications were reported in the STRYDE® group compared to three events of nail failure in the PRECICE® group. One femur in the PRECICE® group needed BMAC injection for delayed healing compared to four femurs in the STRYDE® group.

CONCLUSION

The STRYDE® MILN yields comparable functional results to those of PRECICE® MILN and shows fewer mechanical nail complications. However, STRYDE® MILN requires a slower distraction rate and yields slower healing (larger BHI).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study.

An update on the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening: A quinquennial review Part 1: The further influence of the intramedullary nail in limb lengthening

The goal of limb lengthening is to restore length to bone, safely stretch soft tissues and improve quality of life with minimal complications. Traditionally this was achieved with the use of external fixators, associated with complications related to pin site tethering and infections, joint stiffness and regenerate deformity and fracture following frame removal. The duration of treatment also impacts on patient mental health and well-being. In order to reduce external fixator time, intramedullary nails have been introduced as an adjunct, either at the initial surgery or after completion of lengthening. Complications related to the external fixator still remained and innovation has led to the popularisation of the intramedullary lengthening nail. The lengthening mechanism of the nail can be divided into those with ratchet systems and those driven by motors. In the ratchet group, patients are required to manually rotate their limb, with movement at the osteotomy site, in order to create forward movement. This was often associated with pain, and in some cases led to the requirement of general anaesthesia to enable rotation and continuation of lengthening. Further issues were reported related to lengthening rate control. Once the nail had lengthened sufficiently for the osteotomy to disengage, rapid lengthening termed a 'runaway' nail could occur. The nails were limited to forward movement, and once length was gained it could not be retracted, leading to poor regenerate formation and soft tissue contractures. The introduction of the Fitbone implant utilised a transcutaneous electrical conduit, powered by a high frequency electrical signal, enabling more control over the lengthening. The Precice intramedullary lengthening system is controlled by the use of an external device with two rotating neodymium magnets, which produce rotation of a third magnet in the nail. By altering the direction of the magnet rotation, the lengthening can be controlled both forwards and backwards with sub-millimetre precision. Following initial excellent outcomes published, the use of the lengthening intramedullary nail has become accepted by many as the implant of choice in limb lengthening. The aim of this article comes in two parts. The first to highlight the latest research and clinical results in the last five years using an intramedullary implant during limb lengthening, and the second to report the outcome in extended surgical indications and further implant innovation.

Correction of post-traumatic lower-limb discrepancy with Precice intramedullary lengthening nails: a review of 34 adults with an average follow-up of 2 years

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We report results and complications of gradual bone lengthening for post-traumatic lower-limb length discrepancy (LLD) with Precice intramedullary lengthening nails in 34 adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were lower-limb lengthening using the Precice nail, posttraumatic etiology, age older than 18 years, and minimum follow-up of 12 months after implantation. 34 patients met the inclusion criteria. Radiological and clinical outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

Precice lengthening was performed in the femur in 28 patients (21 antegrade, 7 retrograde) and in the tibia in 6. Mean patient age at time of surgery was 32 years (18-72). Mean preoperative LLD was 31 mm (20-71). Acute correction of axial or rotational malalignment was performed in 11 segments. At final follow-up (mean 2 years [1.1-3.6]), 33 of 34 nails had been removed. All lengthening sites were healed, and all patients mobilized with full weight-bearing. 14 adverse events occurred in 11 patients and were categorized as problems (n = 5), obstacles (n = 3), and complications (n = 6). Unplanned surgery was necessary in 7 patients, 3 of whom did not complete treatment with Precice.

INTERPRETATION

Correction of posttraumatic LLD with or without axial malalignment using Precice intramedullary lengthening nails is associated with a low number of complications and good functional outcome. However, one-fifth of patients in this series needed further unplanned surgery for revision of obstacles or complications.

What Factors Correlate With Length of Stay and Readmission After Limb Lengthening Procedures? A Large-database Study

BACKGROUND

Indications and techniques for limb lengthening procedures have evolved over the past two decades. Although there are several case series reporting on the complications and efficacy of these techniques, limited data are available on length of stay and hospital readmission rates after these procedures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the median length of stay after lower limb lengthening procedures, and is variability in patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical technique associated with length of stay? (2) What is the 1-year readmission rate after lower limb lengthening procedures? (3) Is variability in patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical technique associated with varying rates of hospital readmission?

METHODS

Patients who underwent femoral or tibial lengthening from 2005 to 2015 in seven states were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases. These databases include a large, diverse group of patients across a wide range of hospitals and socioeconomic backgrounds with inclusion of patients regardless of payer. Between 2005 and 2015, there were 3979 inpatient admissions that were identified as involving femoral and/or tibial lengthening procedures based on ICD-9 procedure codes; of those, 2% (97 of 3979) of the inpatient admissions were excluded from analysis because they had ICD-9 procedure codes for primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty, and 10% (394 of 3979) of the inpatient admissions were excluded because they involved repeated admissions of patients with previous hospitalization data within the database. This yielded 3488 patients for analysis. The median (interquartile range) age of patients was 18 years (12 to 41), and 42% (1481 of 3488) of patients were women. A total of 49% (1705 of 3469) of patients were children (younger than 18 years), 19% (675 of 3469) were young adults (18 to 34 years), 24% (817 of 3469) were adults (35 to 59 years), and 8% (272 of 3469) were seniors (60 years and older). Length of stay and rates of readmission at 1 year after the lengthening procedure were calculated. Univariate analysis was performed to examine associations between age, race, payment method, underlying diagnosis, bone lengthened, and lengthening technique with length of stay and readmission rate. Factors found to be significantly associated with the outcome variables (p < 0.05) were further examined with a multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Included patients had a median (IQR) length of hospital stay of 3 days (2 to 4). Given the poor explanatory power of the multivariate model for length of stay (R 2 = 0.03), no meaningful correlations could be drawn between age, race, underlying diagnosis, lengthening technique, and length of stay. The overall 1-year readmission rate was 35% (1237 of 3488). There were higher readmission rates among adult patients compared with pediatric patients (odds ratio 1.78 [95% confidence interval 1.46 to 2.18]; p < 0.001), patients with government insurance compared with commercial insurance (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.54]; p = 0.01), and patients undergoing lengthening via external fixation (OR 1.61 [95% CI 1.29 to 2.02]; p < 0.001) or hybrid fixation (OR 1.81 [95% CI 1.38 to 2.37]; p < 0.001) compared with lengthening with internal fixation only.

CONCLUSION

When counseling patients who may be candidates for limb lengthening, providers should inform individual patients and their caretakers on the anticipated length of hospital stay and likelihood of hospital readmission based on our findings. Adult patients, those with government insurance, and patients undergoing hybrid or external fixator limb lengthening procedures should be advised that they are at greater risk for hospital readmission. The relationship of specific patient-related factors (such as severity of deformity or associated comorbidities) and treatment-related variables (such as amount of lengthening, compliance with physical therapy, or surgeon's experience) with clinical outcomes after lower limb lengthening and the burden of care associated with hospital readmission needs further study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Femoral Lengthening in Children-A Comparison Between Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails and External Fixators

BACKGROUND

Femoral lengthening can be achieved using external fixators or intramedullary lengthening nails. The purpose of this research was to compare the outcome of femoral lengthening in children using PRECICE magnetic lengthening nails with lengthening external fixators.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 50 children who had femoral lengthening. Group A included patients who had lengthening with external fixation, patients in Group B had lengthening with PRECICE intramedullary lengthening nails. Each group included 25 patients. The sample strictly included children aged between 11 and 17 years. Patients in each group were matched according to age and indication for lengthening whether congenital or acquired conditions. The outcomes focused on the ability to achieve target length, healing index, residual malalignment, length of hospitalization following the osteotomy surgery, and encountered complications.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 14.7 years for each group. The length gain was 42±12 mm for Group A and 41.6±8 mm for Group B (P=0.84). Lengthening nails achieved the target length more accurately compared with external fixation (P=0.017). The healing index was significantly higher in group A with 53.2±19 days/cm compared with 40.2±14 days/cm in group B (P=0.03). Group A had significantly higher complications than group B (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the final coronal malalignment between the 2 groups (P=0.2). The mean length of stay was 9.2±5.8 days for group A and 4.2±3.3 days for group B (P=0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic lengthening nails are clinically effective for femoral lengthening in the pediatric population. Compared with external fixation, healing index and complications were more favorable with PRECICE nails. Further research is required to study the cost-effectiveness of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

The influence of advanced age in bone healing after intramedullary limb lengthening

BACKGROUND

Distraction osteogenesis with an intramedullary motorized nail is a well-established method to treat leg length discrepancy (LLD). The complex process of bone consolidation is affected by age, location, comorbidities, smoking and gender. The purpose of this case series was to investigate influencing factors in bone regeneration after intramedullary callus distraction.

HYPOTHESIS

Advanced age influences the outcome of intramedullary limb lengthening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 19 patients after intramedullary telescopic nailing (PRECICE) on the lower limb with a mean age of 43 years. Bone healing was assessed by distraction and healing parameters such as distraction-consolidation time (DCT), distraction index (DI), healing index (HI), lengthening index (LI), and consolidation index (CI).

RESULTS

Confounding factors such as smoking, previous operations on the treated bone, but also the occurrence of complications, and the number of revision surgeries are independent of the patients' age. Younger patients showed a shorter distraction distance, a lower DCT, a lower DI, a higher HI, and a higher CI than older patients. The complication rate requiring nail exchange was higher among the younger patients. Bony healing was observed in all age groups treated with a telescopic nail regardless of age.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age did not influence bone healing or complication rate in intramedullary lengthening. However, the conclusion is limited by the small patient number.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Case control study.

Combined lengthening for acquired leg length discrepancy: Are there advantages of hydroxyapatite-coated intramedullary nails?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to analyze the outcomes of bone lengthening by external fixator associated with flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) in acquired limb length discrepancy (LLD).

HYPOTHESIS

Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated FIN enables reduced External Fixation Index in limb lengthening for acquired leg length discrepancies in comparison to non-HA-coated FIN.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 54 patients (mean age, 17.9 years) operated on for femoral or tibial lengthening by combined technique (External fixator with FIN) for acquired length discrepancy. Titanium non-HA-coated FIN (29 cases) or HA-coated FIN (25 cases) were used. The factors that might influence external fixation index, complication occurrence and outcome were analyzed: age, amount of lengthening, nail diameter, HA-coating vs. non-HA-coated nails.

RESULTS

The mean External Fixation Indexes (EFI) of groups compared for non-HA-coated nails vs. HA-coated nails were not significantly different: 26.5 d/cm and 27.2 d/cm in femoral lengthening and 34.9 d/cm and 31.7 d/cm in tibial lengthening. Positive correlation between the "nail diameter/inner distance between cortices at osteotomy site" ratio and EFI in tibial lengthening was revealed (p=0.034). The nail types and the "nail diameter/medullary canal diameter" ratio interact and have significant simultaneous effect on EFI in femoral lengthening (p=0.021).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study revealed no differences with regards to EFI using HA-coated or non-HA-coated titanium FIN in lengthening for acquired leg-length discrepancies. Combined technique allowed reduced EFI and avoided major complications. Both non-HA-nail and HA-coated nail lengthening provided good and excellent outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; (controlled trial without randomization) prospective comparative study.

Use of a Motorized Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail for Trauma: Tips, Tricks, Corticotomy Techniques, and Rate and Rhythm

The introduction of internal magnetic nails (IMNs) for bone lengthening and bone transport has given us exciting new tools with which to treat segmental bone loss. Distraction osteogenesis has a long record of success in recreating even large segments of bone, but the availability of IMNs now offers the possibility of performing distraction osteogenesis without the drawbacks of external fixation. However, there are aspects of treatment with IMNs that are critical to understand to achieve success and minimize complications. These include assessment of feasibility in relation to available bone stock and segment configuration, the condition of the soft tissue envelope, and the presence of contamination or infection. They also include execution aspects such as bone end preparation, nail placement, need for and positioning of adjuvant fixation, corticotomy techniques, rate and rhythm of distraction, staged screw exchange, docking site preparation, and nail extraction. We discuss these issues in detail and introduce some novel techniques not previously described including the comminuted wedge osteotomy, testing of the nail with initial compression, and retention plug application for nail extraction to assist in optimizing success in certain clinical situations.

Limb lengthening with PRECICE magnetic nail in pediatric patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Limb lengthening techniques play an increasingly important role in the pediatric orthopedic field. The principles of the osteogenesis distraction bonded traditionally with external fixators; however, the recent deployment of fully implantable systems has been able to overcome severities related to external fixators. The PRECICE® is an implantable limb lengthening intramedullary nail system that is remotely controlled and magnetically driven.

AIM

To review the current literature available on this matter in order to assess the PRECICE clinical and radiological outcomes and its possible complications in a population of pediatric patients undergoing limb lengthening.

METHODS

Only five studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included in the review for a total of 131 patients and 135 femurs. The clinical and radiological outcomes of interest were: the main lengthening obtained, the distraction rate, the period of time to full weight bearing, the consolidation index, and the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov score.

RESULTS

In conclusion, data collected from the articles under investigation were comparable with the exception of the consolidation index. Unfortunately, the study population was too small and the patients' follow-up was too short to make definitive conclusions.

CONCLUSION

This review shows that the PRECICE Nail System is still a therapeutic challenge in limb lengthening for pediatric orthopedic surgeons; however, careful pre-operative planning and an accurate surgical technique could allow the correction of more complex deformities with a low rate of complications.

Intramedullary Antibiotic Depot Does Not Preclude Successful Intramedullary Lengthening or Compression

SUMMARY

The challenging problem of long bone infection and limb length difference cannot be addressed using only an antibiotic-coated nonmagnetic static nail. The combined use of resorbable calcium sulfate and magnetic lengthening nails offers a possible solution to this dilemma, as well as for infected nonunions that require compression. We present a combined technique to treat or prevent infection using femoral or tibial intramedullary antibiotic delivery with an absorbable calcium sulfate depot and concomitant internal lengthening or compression using a nail. Adequate débridement is required in cases of established infection and is a prerequisite for this technique.

Efficacy of PRECICE Nail in Treatment of Adult Patients With Posttraumatic Femoral Leg Length Discrepancy

Posttraumatic, limb length discrepancy in adults is a challenge to treat, and multiple treatment protocols over the years have shown varying levels of success and complications. Before the introduction of the PRECICE nail in 2011, our preferred method of limb lengthening used an Ilizarov or Taylor Spatial frame. To assess the PRECICE nail, we evaluated the accuracy and complications during treatment in a series of skeletally mature patients with posttraumatic femoral limb length discrepancy. The surgical technique along with a case series of 8 patients are described in detail. On average, the target lengthening for the PRECICE nail was 44 mm, and all patients achieved lengthening within 2 mm and complete bony consolidation. The only observed complication in our series was a broken screw 1 year after the patient started weight-bearing. The PRECICE nail demonstrated promising results and was useful for bone regeneration and consolidation without the need for additional procedures. The rate of complications was low compared with previous methods, making this device an excellent treatment option.

Bone Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail in 34 Patients with Posttraumatic Limb Length Discrepancies

The Fitbone® motorized nail system has been used to correct limb length discrepancies (LLD) for several years. This study focuses on its application in posttraumatic limb lengthening surgery, its outcome and challenges.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, single center study was conducted between 2010 and 2019 in patients treated with motorized lengthening nails. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic LLD of 20 mm or more. An imaging analysis was done using TraumaCad® software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) to compare frontal alignment angles and limb length discrepancy (LLD) on preoperative and latest follow-up radiographs of the lower limbs.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included with a mean age of 28.8 ± 9.7 years, a mean follow-up of 27.8 ± 13 months and a mean hospital stay of 4.4 ± 1.7 days. The mean LLD was 44 ± 18 mm in 29 femoral and 32 ± 8 mm in 4 tibial cases, which was reduced to less than 10 mm in 25/34 (74%) patients. The mean healing index was 84.6 ± 62.5 days/cm for femurs and 92 ± 38.6 days/cm for tibias. The mean time to resume full weight-bearing without walking aids was 226 days ± 133. There was no significant difference between preoperative and final follow-up alignment angles and range of motion. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) was corrected in the subgroup of 10 LLD patients with varus deformity of the femur (preoperative 95.7° (±5.0) vs. postoperative 91.5° (±3.4), p = 0.008). According to Paley's classification, there were 14 problems, 10 obstacles and 2 complications.

DISCUSSION

Six instances of locking screw pull out, often requiring reoperation, raise the question of whether a more systematic use of blocking screws that provide greater stability might be indicated. Lack of compliance can lead to poor outcomes, patient selection in posttraumatic LLD patients is therefore important.

CONCLUSION

Limb lengthening with a motorized lengthening nail for posttraumatic LLD is a relatively safe and reliable procedure. Full patient compliance is crucial. In-depth knowledge of lengthening and deformity correction techniques is essential to prevent and manage complications.

Systematic review of complications with externally controlled motorized intramedullary bone lengthening nails (FITBONE and PRECICE) in 983 segments

Background and purpose - In recent years motorized intramedullary lengthening nails have become increasingly popular. Complications are heterogeneously reported in small case series and therefore we made a systematic review of complications occurring in lower limb lengthening with externally controlled motorized intramedullary bone lengthening nails.Methods - We performed a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library with medical subject headings: Bone Nails, Bone Lengthening, and PRECICE and FITBONE nails. Complications were graded on severity and origin.Results - The search identified 952 articles; 116 were full text screened, and 41 were included in the final analysis. 983 segments were lengthened in 782 patients (age 8-74 years). The distribution of nails was: 214 FITBONE, 747 PRECICE, 22 either FITBONE or PRECICE. Indications for lengthening were: 208 congenital shortening, 305 acquired limb shortening, 111 short stature, 158 with unidentified etiology. We identified 332 complications (34% of segments): Type I (minimal intervention) in 11% of segments; Type II (substantial change in treatment plan) in 15% of segments; Type IIIA (failure to achieve goal) in 5% of segments; and Type IIIB (new pathology or permanent sequelae) in 3% of segments. Device and bone complications were the most frequent.Interpretation - The overall risk of complications was 1 complication for every 3 segments lengthened. In 1 of every 4 segments, complications had a major impact leading to substantial change in treatment, failure to achieve lengthening goal, introduction of a new pathology, or permanent sequelae. However, as no standardized reporting method for complications exists, the true complication rates might be different.

Bone transport with magnetic intramedullary nails in long bone defects

Background

This study describes the outcomes of internal bone transport with magnetic nails in five cases of traumatic segmental femoral bone defects.

Methods

Five patients with open fracture of the femur and diaphyseal bone loss were included between May 2018 and August 2020. The mean femoral defect was 8.7 cm (range 5.6–16.0).

Intervention

We used plate-assisted bone segment transport (PABST) with PRECICE magnetic nails.

Results

All five patients have fully consolidated. The mean consolidation time and index were 7.5 months and 0.8 mo/cm, respectively. The mean follow-up was 21.3 months. The main complications were reduced knee ROM, mild varus deformity and plate bending. Post-operative SF-36, Oxford Knee scores and ED-5Q-5L scores were also compiled for four of five patients. SF-36 and Oxford Knee scores were reported without pre-injury data for comparison. ED-5Q-5L index and VAS were compared UK population norm and were both found to be statistically insignificant (p = 0.071 and p = 0.068, respectively).

Conclusion

Bone transport with magnetic nails has the capacity to obtain good functional recovery in long bone defects despite variable outcome pictures. In response to variable outcome reporting in the literature, we propose a standard reporting template for future studies to facilitate more rigorous analyses.

How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone

PURPOSE

Various external fixation systems for lower extremity long bone deformities have been used to various degrees of success, while newer mechanical lengthening nail (MLN) systems offer the potential for improved patient outcomes. Proponents of MLNs argue that they reduce the number of operations, infectious complications, and improve quality of life; however, the evidence to support these claims is scant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal lengthening system for treating post-traumatic long bone deformity.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for comparative studies of lengthening techniques among adult patients with axial deformities. Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate. Treatment groups were pooled into external fixation (EF) alone, combined internal and external fixation (CIF), and mechanical lengthening nail (MLN). Outcomes were mean lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and reported complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 725 patients (mean age: 29.6 years, 74% male) were included. Nearly all of the studies were either prospective or retrospective cohort studies (n = 12), with one randomized controlled trial of moderate study quality. The mean limb lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and rate of reoperation were similar among the MLN, EF, and CIF groups.

CONCLUSION

The purported decreased the duration of lengthening and the risk of reoperation associated with MLNs was not demonstrated in this review. Patients with post-traumatic leg length deformities remain a challenging patient population to treat, with intervention being associated with high rates of infectious complications and need for revision operations.

How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone

PURPOSE

Various external fixation systems for lower extremity long bone deformities have been used to various degrees of success, while newer mechanical lengthening nail (MLN) systems offer the potential for improved patient outcomes. Proponents of MLNs argue that they reduce the number of operations, infectious complications, and improve quality of life; however, the evidence to support these claims is scant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal lengthening system for treating post-traumatic long bone deformity.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for comparative studies of lengthening techniques among adult patients with axial deformities. Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate. Treatment groups were pooled into external fixation (EF) alone, combined internal and external fixation (CIF), and mechanical lengthening nail (MLN). Outcomes were mean lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and reported complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 725 patients (mean age: 29.6 years, 74% male) were included. Nearly all of the studies were either prospective or retrospective cohort studies (n = 12), with one randomized controlled trial of moderate study quality. The mean limb lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and rate of reoperation were similar among the MLN, EF, and CIF groups.

CONCLUSION

The purported decreased the duration of lengthening and the risk of reoperation associated with MLNs was not demonstrated in this review. Patients with post-traumatic leg length deformities remain a challenging patient population to treat, with intervention being associated with high rates of infectious complications and need for revision operations.

How should we lengthen post-traumatic limb defects? a systematic review and comparison of motorized lengthening systems, combined internal and external fixation and external fixation alone

PURPOSE

Various external fixation systems for lower extremity long bone deformities have been used to various degrees of success, while newer mechanical lengthening nail (MLN) systems offer the potential for improved patient outcomes. Proponents of MLNs argue that they reduce the number of operations, infectious complications, and improve quality of life; however, the evidence to support these claims is scant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the optimal lengthening system for treating post-traumatic long bone deformity.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for comparative studies of lengthening techniques among adult patients with axial deformities. Studies were screened and data extracted in duplicate. Treatment groups were pooled into external fixation (EF) alone, combined internal and external fixation (CIF), and mechanical lengthening nail (MLN). Outcomes were mean lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and reported complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 725 patients (mean age: 29.6 years, 74% male) were included. Nearly all of the studies were either prospective or retrospective cohort studies (n = 12), with one randomized controlled trial of moderate study quality. The mean limb lengthening achieved, lengthening index, and rate of reoperation were similar among the MLN, EF, and CIF groups.

CONCLUSION

The purported decreased the duration of lengthening and the risk of reoperation associated with MLNs was not demonstrated in this review. Patients with post-traumatic leg length deformities remain a challenging patient population to treat, with intervention being associated with high rates of infectious complications and need for revision operations.

Medium-term evaluation of leg lengthening by ISKD® intramedullary nail in 28 patients: Should we still use this lengthening system?

INTRODUCTION

Lower-limb lengthening presently uses intramedullary nailing. There are motorized systems and mechanical systems, each with their specific complications. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of ISKD® mechanical nails (Orthofix Inc., Texas, USA) on 3D EOS® imaging, and also complications and functional impact.

HYPOTHESIS

The study hypothesis was that nail lengthening is effective but should no longer use the ISKD® system, due to the high rate of specific complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study included 28 patients (14 female, 14 male) undergoing limb-lengthening by ISKD® nail between 2005 and 2018. Mean age was 29 years. Twenty-four procedures were femoral and 4 tibial. Lengthening and consolidation parameters and residual discrepancy were measured on 3D EOS® imaging. Complications and functional scores were collated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight ISKD® nails were implanted in 28 patients. Mean follow-up was 75 months. Planned lengthening was achieved in 78.5% of cases, for a mean lengthening of 34.5mm. Mean lengthening and consolidation indices were respectively 0.94mm/day and 105 days/cm. Length discrepancy showed significant correction, with improvement in functional scores (p<0.01). The overall complications rate was 67.9%, 76% of which were specific to the ISKD® nail.

DISCUSSION

The present study confirmed that nail lengthening is an indication of choice in lower-limb length discrepancy, but that the ISKD® system should no longer be used, due to an excessive rate of specific complications. Complications are due to deficient control of lengthening rate, not found with new-generation motorized nails, which show much fewer complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study without control group.

[All internal segmental transport in tibial bone defects: first experiences with the PRECICE bone transport system]

Bone loss of the distal tibia represents a major challenge for the treating surgeons and the reconstruction technique. This is particularly true for septic bone loss. Several techniques are available, ranging from callus distraction of Ilizarov frames and monorail techniques as well as transport with plates and nails; however, implants for internal segmental transport for bone defects have so far not been available. This case report describes worldwide the first reconstruction of a distal tibial defect by reconstruction of the major arterial flow path with flap coverage and all inside segmental transport using a motorized segmental transport nail without additional osteosynthesis or add-on module.

Early outcomes of magnetic intramedullary compression nailing for humeral fractures

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment protocol for humeral shaft fractures at risk for nonunions is controversial. Here, we aim to describe magnetic intramedullary compression nailing as an option for these challenging scenarios and to evaluate its clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective case series was performed at an urban university-based level-1 trauma center. Patients aged 18-65 who underwent fixation of their at-risk humerus shaft fracture using the PRECICE nail were included in this investigation. These fractures are characterized by a persistent distraction gap, minimal callous formation, or malalignment greater than 20 degrees. The study data were collected through a retrospective chart review and review of the radiographic studies. Primary outcome measure was radiographic union. Secondary outcome measures included mechanical failure, nonunion, malunion, medical, and surgical complications. Functional outcome was determined by range of motion and restoration of rotator cuff strength.

RESULTS

A total of six patients were included who underwent treatment of their humeral shaft fracture with a NuVasive PRECICE nail after failure of conservative management. After nail placement along with our compression protocol, all patients achieved bony union and experienced favorable outcomes with return to their previous working status. Two complications included a superficial incisional infection treated with antibiotics and a backing out of proximal screw which did not cause discomfort. No other mechanical failures, surgical complications, or medical complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results of controlled compression nailing for humeral shaft fracture demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes. This technique may be utilized for these challenging situations.

Post-retrieval functionality testing of PRECICE lengthening nails: The "Sleeper" nail concept

INTRODUCTION

PRECICE intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails, introduced in 2011, have changed the landscape of long bone limb lengthening. The implants have a stroke ranging from 5 to 8 cm, but it may be desirable to perform part of the lengthening at one treatment, allow bone healing, leave the implant in place, dormant, and then return one or more years later to re-lengthen with the same implant. We call this the "sleeper" nail concept. This strategy may be gentler for the joints and soft tissues. Would the nail mechanism still be functional one or more years later?

METHODS

We tested 102 intact, consecutively explanted nails. Using a "fast magnet," the male part was lengthened to 5 mm short of its maximum stroke capacity and retracted back to 35 mm (all nails start with the male part exposed 30 mm). The nails passed the test if the male part succeeded in lengthening to 5 mm short of the maximum stroke capacity and back to 35 mm (or only retract in case fully deployed at testing). During our testing, the nails were prevented from reaching their full capacity of lengthening/retraction to avoid jamming the gears. Failure was defined as the inability or partial ability to complete the process.

RESULTS

Eighty-six nails (84.3%) performed successfully according to our testing standard. When comparing successful and failed nails in terms of nail type, generation, diameter, length and in vivo interval, there was no statistical significance. Comparing both groups in terms of status at testing (fully deployed or not) showed statistical significance with 9 of the 16 failed nails fully deployed at testing (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dormant PRECICE nails can be reactivated for further lengthening. The results imply that full deployment may damage the mechanism, making future re-use by retracting and then re-lengthening unsuccessful. The candidate nails for this purpose should not have any signs of clear damage (bending or breakage) and should not have been fully deployed. However, surgeons and patients should be aware of the need for possible nail exchange if the "sleeper" nail fails to wake up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV case series analysis of retrieved surgical implants.

Role of the Ilizarov non-free bone plasty in the management of long bone defects and nonunion: Problems solved and unsolved

BACKGROUND

Ilizarov non-free bone plasty is a method of distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov apparatus for external fixation which originated in Russia and was disseminated across the world. It has been used in long bone defect and nonunion management along with free vascularized grafting and induced membrane technique. However, the shortcomings and problems of these methods still remain the issues which restrict their overall use.

AIM

To study the recent available literature on the role of Ilizarov non-free bone plasty in long bone defect and nonunion management, its problems and the solutions to these problems in order to achieve better treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for literature sources on distraction osteogenesis, free vascularized grafting and induced membrane technique used in long bone defect and nonunion treatment within a five-year period (2015-2019). Full-text clinical articles in the English language were selected for analysis only if they contained treatment results, complications and described large patient samples (not less than ten cases for congenital, post-tumor resection cases or rare conditions, and more than 20 cases for the rest). Case reports were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty full-text articles and reviews on distraction osteogenesis were chosen. Thirty-five clinical studies containing large series of patients treated with this method and problems with its outcome were analyzed. It was found that distraction osteogenesis techniques provide treatment for segmental bone defects and nonunion of the lower extremity in many clinical situations, especially in complex problems. The Ilizarov techniques treat the triad of problems simultaneously (bone loss, soft-tissue loss and infection). Management of tibial defects mostly utilizes the Ilizarov circular fixator. Monolateral fixators are preferable in the femur. The use of a ring fixator is recommended in patients with an infected tibial bone gap of more than 6 cm. High rates of successful treatment were reported by the authors that ranged from 77% to 100% and depended on the pathology and the type of Ilizarov technique used. Hybrid fixation and autogenous grafting are the most applicable solutions to avoid after-frame regenerate fracture or deformity and docking site nonunion.

CONCLUSION

The role of Ilizarov non-free bone plasty has not lost its significance in the treatment of segmental bone defects despite the shortcomings and treatment problems encountered.

PRECICE intramedullary nail in the treatment of adult leg length discrepancy

BACKGROUND

Limb length discrepancy in adults is not an uncommon occurrence following trauma and limited literature exists on limb lengthening in skeletally mature populations using modern techniques. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of limb lengthening surgery using the PRECICE magnetic limb lengthening intramedullary nail in an adult population.

METHOD

From 2013 to 2018, 21 adult patients were operated by a single surgeon, using the PRECICE nail, for lower limb length discrepancies. Low energy femoral osteotomies were performed via a limited approach. Tibial osteotomies were performed using a percutaneous technique and Gigli saw. A distraction rate of 0.75 mm/day was used as a standard protocol with change in rate of 0.25 mm/day implemented as required. Patients were followed up until radiological evidence of consolidation.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 36.4 years (range 21-65), with 19 patients being male. Seventeen femoral and four tibial lengthenings were performed. Mean follow up was 15.1 months (range 6-30). Eleven patients underwent deformity correction at time of nail insertion (10 femoral, 1 tibial). All patients achieved correct lengthening (mean gain 36.5 mm, range 18-80 mm). All patients consolidated their regenerate bone (mean 268 days, range 99-825). Mean femoral consolidation index was 6.5, mean tibial consolidation index was 16.1 (p = 0.002). Six patients had delayed consolidation of regenerate bone. Increasing age (p = 0.04), number of prior operations (p = 0.03), and smoking (p = 0.01) were associated with delayed consolidation. Four of 21 (19%) patients suffered a complication, with one implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRECICE intramedullary nail is a reliable limb lengthening device in skeletally mature patients, providing predictable lengthening and bone regeneration.

Lengthening Nails for Distraction Osteogenesis: A Review of Current Practice and Presentation of Extended Indications

PURPOSE

Circular frames have been the gold standard of treatment for complex deformity corrections and bone loss. However, despite the success of frames, patient satisfaction has been low, and complications are frequent. Most recently, lengthening nails have been used to correct leg length discrepancies. In this article, we review the current trends in deformity correction with emphasis on bone lengthening and present our case examples on the use of lengthening nails for management of complex malunions, non-unions, and a novel use in bone transport.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nonsystematic literature review on the topic was performed. Four case examples from our institute, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, East Sussex, England, UK, were included.

RESULTS

New techniques based on intramedullary bone lengthening and deformity correction are replacing the conventional external frames. Introduction of lengthening and then nailing and lengthening over a nail techniques paved the way for popularization of the more recent lengthening nails. Lengthening nails have gone through evolution from the first mechanical nails to motorized nails and more recently the magnetic lengthening nails. Two case examples demonstrate successful use of lengthening nails for management of malunion, and two case examples describe novel use in management of non-unions, including the first report in the literature of plate-assisted bone segment transport for the longest defect successfully treated using this novel technique.

CONCLUSION

With the significant advancement of intramedullary lengthening devices with lower complications rates and higher patient satisfaction, the era of the circular frame may be over.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Barakat AH, Sayani J, O'Dowd-Booth C, et al. Lengthening Nails for Distraction Osteogenesis: A Review of Current Practice and Presentation of Extended Indications. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(1):54-61.

Repeated intramedullary stabilization following failed telescopic nail lengthening - An appropriate treatment strategy

Externally magnetic-controlled intramedullary telescopic nails for bone lengthening have recently gained popularity due to many advantages when compared to more traditional lengthening methods. Patients requiring lengthening often present with a clinical history of previous multiple surgeries increasing the risk for complications of further procedures. However, studies regarding the treatment of complications following implantation of these devices remain scarce in literature. Therefore, we report our experience with revision surgery after lengthening with a telescopic intramedullary lengthening nail. In 6 out of 20 cases (30%) of lower limb lengthening for leg length discrepancy revision surgery was necessary. Two revisions were necessary due to nail breakage while the other 4 cases required a secondary procedure for non-union. In all cases, revision surgery included standard intramedullary locking nailing with additional autologous bone grafting. The median interval between index and revision surgery was 11.5 months (range 2-15 months). Satisfying clinical results, the intended extend of lengthening and bony consolidation was observed in all 6 patients. We conclude that revision surgery using an intramedullary locking nail with autologous bone grafting after failed telescopic nail-based lengthening represents an useful salvage procedure in these cases.

Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system

Aims

The Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system has demonstrated significant benefits over external fixation lengthening methods, leading to a paradigm shift in limb lengthening. This study compares outcomes following antegrade and retrograde femoral lengthening in both adolescent and adult patients.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was undertaken of a consecutive series of 107 femoral lengthening operations in 92 patients. In total, 73 antegrade nails and 34 retrograde nails were inserted. Outcome was assessed by the regenerate healing index (HI), hip and knee range of movement (ROM), and the presence of any complications.

Results

The mean lengthening was 4.65 cm (1.5 to 8) in the antegrade group and 4.64 cm (1.6 to 8) in the retrograde group. Of the 107 lengthenings, 100 had sufficient datapoints to calculate the mean HI. This was 31.6 days/cm (15 to 108). There was a trend toward a lower (better) HI with an antegrade nail and better outcomes in adolescent patients, but these were not statistically significant. Hip and knee ROM was maintained and/or improved following commencement of femoral lengthening in 44 patients (60%) of antegrade nails and 13 patients (38%) of retrograde nails. In female patients, loss of movement occurred both earlier and following less total length achieved. Minor implant complications included locking bolt migration and in one patient deformity of the nail, but no implant failed to lengthen and there were no deep infections. Three patients had delayed union, five patients required surgical intervention for joint contracture.

Conclusion

This study confirms excellent results in femoral lengthening with antegrade and retrograde Precice nails. There is a trend for better healing and less restriction in hip and knee movement following antegrade nails. There are clinical scenarios, that mandate the use of a retrograde nail. However, when these are not present, we recommend the use of antegrade nailing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1168–1176

[Osteotomies for deformity correction on the pediatric knee]

BACKGROUND

Fractures in childhood can result in malalignment and/or leg shortening due to insufficient reduction, malunion or injury to the growth plate.

OBJECTIVE

Different types of posttraumatic deformities around the knee as well as the diagnostic approach and correction are discussed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

While deformities without shortening can often be corrected during surgery with internal fixation, limb shortening with or without malalignment has to be treated with external fixation or internal lengthening nails.

RESULTS

Modern six-axis external fixators enable simultaneous lengthening and axial correction in all planes in patients from childhood onwards. A correction using lengthening nails is possible at the end of growth or if the physis has already been closed by trauma.

CONCLUSION

Precise analysis of the deformity and leg length discrepancy is necessary to select the best point in time and the right surgical procedure and hardware for correction.

A Comparison of Femoral Lengthening Methods Favors the Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail When Compared with Lengthening Over a Nail

BACKGROUND

Bone lengthening with an internal lengthening nail (ILN) avoids the need for external fixation and requires one less surgical procedure than lengthening over a nail (LON). However, LON has been shown to be superior to femoral internal lengthening using a mechanical nail. The magnetic ILN, a remote-controlled and magnet-driven device, may have overcome the weaknesses of earlier internal lengthening technology and may be superior to LON.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the magnetic ILN more accurate than LON for femoral lengthening? (2) Does the magnetic ILN demonstrate more precise distraction rate control than LON? (3) Does the magnetic ILN result in faster regenerate site healing, with more robust callus, than LON? (4) Does the magnetic ILN result in fewer complications, including impediments to knee motion, than LON?

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective comparison of the records and radiographs of 21 consecutive patients with 22 femoral lengthenings using LONs and 35 consecutive patients with 40 femoral lengthenings using remote-controlled magnetic ILNs. Primary outcomes measured included accuracy, distraction rate precision, time to bony union, final knee range of motion, regenerate quality, and complications. The minimum follow-up times for the LON and ILN cohorts were 13 and 21 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ILN had a lower post-treatment residual limb-length discrepancy (0.3 mm) than those treated with LON (3.6 mm). The rate of distraction was closer to the goal of 1 mm/day and more tightly controlled for the ILN cohort (1 mm/day) than that for the LON group (0.8 mm/day; SD, 0.2). Regenerate quality was not significantly different between the cohorts. Bone healing index for ILN was not statistically significant. Time to union was shorter in the ILN group (3.3 months) than that in the LON group (4.5 months). A lower percentage of patients experienced a complication in the ILN group (18%) than in the LON group (45%). Knee flexion at the end of distraction was greater for ILN patients (105°) than that for LON patients (88.8°), but this difference was no longer observed after 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral lengthening with magnetic ILN was more accurate than with LON. The magnetic ILN comports the additional advantage of greater precision with distraction rate control and fewer complications. Both techniques afford reliable healing and do not significantly affect knee motion at the final follow-up. The magnetic ILN method showed no superiority in regenerate quality and healing rate.

Retrograde magnetic internal lengthening nail for acute femoral deformity correction and limb lengthening

INTRODUCTION

The Precice magnetic internal lengthening intramedullary nail is being used with great success in femur lengthening and deformity correction with a retrograde approach. Areas Covered: Our personal history of limb lengthening and the Precice nail will be reviewed. Several technical aspects are discussed including design updates, pre operative planning, selection of nail length, the use of blocking screws and intra operative temporary external fixation, osteotomy practice, post operative management, and cost analysis. Expert Commentary: The phenomenal bone healing ability for the retrograde Precice nail after femoral osteotomy for lengthening, even after acute deformity correction, is recognized throughout the growing body of scientific publications on this topic. The few failures that have occurred appear to be attributable to excessive loading of the femur and implant during a vulnerable time of bone healing. Further studies with more uniform outcome criteria need to be conducted to better standardize user's experiences. The higher one time cost of the implant is offset by the reduced number of surgeries needed when compared with the gold standard of lengthening-over-nail-technique, and we suspect that patients return to work sooner due to the ability to wear normal clothing and the reduction in pain throughout the entire lengthening process.

Use of internal lengthening nails in post-traumatic sequelae

External fixators are a well-established modality for treating fractures with bone defects, leg-length discrepancy, malunion, nonunion and other post-traumatic consequences. However, use of internal lengthening rods has remarkably increased recently for post-traumatic conditions. The main advantage of internal lengthening rods is eliminating pin-site complications. Internal lengthening rods are also associated with less pain. Motorised internal lengthening rods show promising performance in post-traumatic cases. Rigorous pre-operative planning is paramount to reducing lengthening-related complications. Certain types of internal lengthening rods offer bidirectional movement capability. Nail mechanism malfunction is a possibility with all kinds of nails. Direct doctor supervision is required, especially in the initial stages while the nail is lengthening. Internal lengthening nails are not as stiff as regular nails, with intricate internal mechanisms that can be broken under inattentive weightbearing activities. Preliminary positive outcomes indicate the role of internal lengthening rods in treating post-traumatic problems of leg-length discrepancy, malunion and nonunion.