Patient Reported Pain After Successful Nonunion Surgery: Can We Completely Eliminate It?

Inpatient pain alleviation after orthopaedic trauma surgery-are we doing a good job?

PURPOSE

Poor pain alleviation (PPA) after orthopaedic surgery is known to increase recovery time, readmissions, patient dissatisfaction, and lead to chronic postsurgical pain. This study's goal was to identify the magnitude of PPA and its risk factors in the orthopaedic trauma patient population.

METHODS

A single-institution's electronic medical records from 2015 to 2018 were available for retrospective analysis. Inclusion criteria included orthopaedic fracture surgery patients admitted to the hospital for 24 h or more. Collected variables included surgery type, basic demographics, comorbidities, inpatient medications, pain scores, and length of stay. PPA was defined as a pain score of ≥ 8 on at least three occasions 4-12 h apart. Associations between collected variables and PPA were derived using a multivariable logistic regression model and expressed in adjusted odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 1663 patients underwent fracture surgeries from 2015 to 2018, and 25% of them reported PPA. Female sex, previous use of narcotics, increased ASA, increased baseline pain score, and younger age without comorbidities were identified as significant risk factors for PPA. Spine procedures were associated with increased risk of PPA, while procedures in the hip, shoulder, and knee had reduced risk. Patients experiencing PPA were less likely to receive NSAIDs compared to other pain medications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found an unacceptably high rate of PPA after fracture surgery. While the identified risk factors for PPA were all non-modifiable, our results highlight the necessity to improve application of current multimodal approaches to pain alleviation including a more personalized approach to pain alleviation.

No decay in outcomes at a mean 8 years following surgical treatment for aseptic fracture nonunion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare medium to long term patient reported outcomes to one-year data for patients treated surgically for an aseptic fracture nonunion.

METHODS

305 patients surgically treated for a fracture-nonunion were prospectively followed. Data collected included pain scores measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), clinical outcomes assessed by the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), and range of motion. 75% of patients in this study had lower extremity fracture nonunions and 25% had upper extremity fracture nonunions. Femur fracture nonunions were the most common. Data at latest follow-up was compared to one-year follow-up using the independent t-test.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were available for follow-up data at an average of eight years. There were no differences in patient reported outcomes between one and eight years according to the standardized total SMFA (p = 0.982), functional index SMFA (p = 0.186), bothersome index SMFA (p = 0.396), activity index SMFA (p = 0.788), emotional index SMFA (p = 0.923), or mobility index SMFA (p = 0.649). There was also no difference in reported pain (p = 0.534). Range of motion data was collected for patients who followed up in clinic for an average of eight years after their surgical treatment. 58% of these patients reported a slight increase in range of motion at an average of eight years.

CONCLUSION

Patient functional outcomes, range of motion, and reported pain all normalize after one year following surgical treatment for fracture nonunion and do not change significantly at an average of eight years. Surgeons can feel confident in counseling patients that their results will last and they do not need to follow up beyond one year, barring pain or other complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Injury perceptions and their association with recovery outcomes in adults with traumatic orthopaedic injuries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

How people perceive their injury may be associated with recovery. This scoping review used the Common Sense Model of Illness Perceptions (CSM) as a framework to: (1) characterise injury perceptions; (2) describe biopsychosocial factors related to injury perceptions, and (3) determine how injury perceptions are associated with recovery outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A broad search strategy was used across eight databases to identify studies exploring injury perceptions and related concepts in adults with traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Quality appraisal was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

The search yielded 9736 records, of which 22 publications were included; 12 quantitative and 10 qualitative studies. Overall, the quality of the evidence was low to moderate. Consistent with the CSM, injury perceptions comprised beliefs relating to the injury diagnosis, consequences, causes, recovery duration, and treatments. Perceptions of injury were multidimensional and influenced by personal, inter-personal, and socio-cultural factors. Negative injury perceptions were associated with worse functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this review provided some insight into the characteristics of injury perceptions, relationships between injury perceptions and recovery, and characteristics of perceptions across different socio-cultural or clinical settings are still poorly understood.Implications for rehabilitationA person's perception of their injury is complex; it emerges from dynamic interactions between personal, interpersonal and socio-cultural elements.People who perceive that their injury represents a threat to them typically report higher pain, negative affect, and worse general health than people with more positive perceptions of injury.Rehabilitation providers should consider how they might positively influence perceptions of traumatic orthopaedic injury.Perceptions of injury might be influenced at the individual level (e.g., during healthcare encounters), or at a system level, such as through endorsement of codes of practice for rehabilitation clinicians or funding of psychologically informed treatments to help people better understand their injuries.

Consensus statement on smoking cessation in patients with pain

Smoking is closely associated with the development of various cancers and tobacco-related illnesses such as cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. However, data are scarce on the relationship between smoking and both acute and chronic pain. In addition to nicotine, tobacco smoke contains more than 4000 different compounds. Although nicotine is not the sole cause of smoking-induced diseases, it plays a critical role in pain-related pathophysiology. Despite the acute analgesic effects of nicotine, long-term exposure leads to tolerance and increased pain sensitivity due to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization and neuronal plastic changes. The purpose of smoking cessation interventions in smoking patients with pain is primarily not only to reduce their pain and associated limitations in activities of daily living, but also to improve the outcomes of underlying pain-causing conditions and reduce the risks of tobacco-related disorders. This statement aims to summarize the available evidence on the impact of smoking on pain and to inform medical professionals of the significance of smoking cessation in patients with pain.

Innovations in orthopaedic trauma: Top advancements of the past two decades and predictions for the next two

The first Trauma and Orthopaedic unit dates back to 1780, originally dedicated to the treatment of children's deformities. The specialty has subsequently become multifaceted, with a plethora of subspecialty areas of which orthopaedic trauma is the most commonly practiced. Recently there has been a significant demand for an evidence base with more than 130,000 of the 162,000 publications in the last century occurring within the past 20 years. This narrative review will summarise some of the more landmark changes within orthopaedic trauma that have been made within the past 20 years, whilst also attempting to predict where the specialty will continue to develop as we move forward.

Hip-preserving surgery for nonunion about the hip

INTRODUCTION

Nonunions about the hip occur as a result of femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and certain subtrochanteric fractures. Treatment of a hip fracture nonunion allows for the choice between hip preservation or arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to examine outcomes of hip-preservation nonunion surgery METHODS: Patients who underwent hip preservation for a fracture nonunion of the femoral neck, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric region to 1 cm below the lesser trochanter over a 10-year period were identified in our nonunion registry. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Functional outcomes were recorded at follow-up visits. For comparison regarding surgical and hospital outcomes, a group of 23 patients who underwent conversion total hip arthroplasties (cTHA) at the same academic medical center was reviewed. Quality measures such as length of stay, reoperation, and complications were collected. All statistics analysis utilized IBM SPSS 25 (Armonk, NY) RESULTS: Thirty patients who underwent 30 hip-preserving nonunion surgeries were analyzed and compared with 23 cTHA patients. Twenty-nine nonunions went on to heal (average time to union 6.3 months). There was improvement in functional outcome scores for the hip preservation group between baseline and latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Reoperation was required in five patients (17%), including four failed to heal and required a second repair to gain union and one failure that was converted to THA rather than attempt a second nonunion repair. Hip preservation failures were older than those that healed with the index treatment (p = 0.11). There was no significant difference in hospital length of stay, complication rate, or need for reoperation when compared to cTHA group.

CONCLUSION

Hip-preserving surgery is an option that should be considered for patients with nonunion of fractures about the hip. The rates of complications (20.3 vs 17.3%) and reoperation (16.7 vs 17.3%) were equivalent to conversion THA. Excellent outcomes can be achieved in terms of radiographic union and function with hip preservation.

Can We Predict the Need for Unplanned Reoperation After Nonunion Repair?

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with the need for reoperations in patients treated surgically for fracture nonunion.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

One urban Level 1 trauma center and an orthopaedic specialty hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

This study included 365 patients who did not and 95 patients who did undergo a reoperation after nonunion repair.

INTERVENTION

All patients who underwent fracture nonunion repair were identified. Baseline demographic, injury, and surgical information were collected. These factors were compared between patients who did and did not require an unplanned reoperation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

An unplanned reoperation after index fracture nonunion surgery.

RESULTS

When compared with patients who did not undergo a reoperation after their index fracture nonunion surgery, patients who underwent at least 1 reoperation had a greater proportion of those who sustained an open fracture, a high-energy injury, initial neurologic or vascular injuries, the need for a flap or soft tissue graft at initial treatment, and lower extremity injuries with univariate analysis. Unplanned reoperation was also associated with diagnosis of "infected" nonunion at initial nonunion surgery. Multivariate analysis confirmed initial nerve or vascular injuries and positive infection status were statistically significant predictors of a reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial injury characteristics such as nerve or vascular injury at initial injury and positive infection status at the index nonunion surgery were associated with the need for a secondary surgery after nonunion repair. Appropriate care of these patients should be aimed at adjusting expectations of unplanned reoperation in the future and potentially enhanced treatment strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of Patients With Nonunion After Open Tibial Shaft Fractures With or Without Soft Tissue Coverage Procedures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent soft tissue flap coverage during treatment of a tibia fracture nonunion.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred fifty-seven patients were treated for a fracture nonunion after a tibia fracture over a 15-year period. Sixty-six patients had sustained an open tibial fracture initially and 25 of these patients underwent soft tissue flaps for their open tibia fracture nonunion.

INTERVENTION

Manipulation of soft tissue flaps, either placement or elevation for graft placement in ununited previously open tibial fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Bony healing, time to union, ultimate soft tissue status, postoperative complications, and functional outcome scores using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). This group was compared with a group of open tibial fracture nonunions that did not undergo soft tissue transfer.

RESULTS

Bony healing was achieved in 24 of 25 patients (96.0%) who received flaps at a mean time to union of 8.7 ± 3.3 months compared with 39 of 41 patients (95.1%) at a mean 7.5 ± 3.2 months (P > 0.05) in the noncoverage group. Healing rate and time to union did not differ between groups. At latest follow-up, the flap coverage group reported a mean SMFA index of 17.1 compared with an SMFA index of 27.7 for the noncoverage group (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of soft tissue flaps in the setting of open tibia shaft nonunion repair surgery are associated with a high union rate (>90%). Coverage with or manipulation of soft tissue flaps did not result in improved bony healing rate or time to union compared with those who did not require flaps. However, soft tissue flap coverage was associated with higher functional scores at long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of dexmedetomidine on peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion

PURPOSE

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative agent with minimal respiratory and hemodynamic effects. The present study aimed to evaluate its effectiveness in peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent PD catheter insertion under spinal anesthesia in our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were divided into the DEX and non-DEX groups according the use of DEX. After 1:1 propensity score matching to adjust for age, sex, body mass index, mean blood pressure (BP), and Charlson comorbidity index, we compared operation-related outcomes, including peak numerical rating scale (NRS), occurrence of nausea, vital signs, or operative time between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of a total of 44 patients, 9 patients received DEX, and 35 did not. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 8 patients. Peak NRS was significantly lower (P = 0.003) in the DEX group compared with the non-DEX group. Maximum mean BP during the operation was also significantly lower in the DEX group compared with the non-DEX group (P = 0.020), with no significant differences in minimum mean BP between the two groups (P = 0.831). The DEX group showed a trend of shortened operative time (P = 0.068). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of nausea (P = 1.000). Moreover, there was no clinically important adverse event associated with use of DEX.

CONCLUSION

The use of DEX in PD catheter insertion under spinal anesthesia could safely improve operative analgesia.

Predicting Functional Outcomes Following Fracture Nonunion Repair-Development and Validation of a Risk Profiling Tool

OBJECTIVES

To develop a tool that can be used preoperatively to identify patients at risk of poor functional outcome following operative repair of fracture nonunion.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred twenty-eight patients who underwent operative repair of a fracture nonunion were prospectively followed for a minimum of 12 months post-operatively.

INTERVENTION

After randomization, 223 (68%) patients comprised an experimental cohort and 105 (32%) patients comprised a separate validation cohort. Within the experimental cohort, forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression was applied to 17 independent variables to generate a predictive model identifying patients at risk of having a poor functional outcome [Predicting Risk of Function in Trauma-Nonunion (PRoFiT-NU) Score].

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Functional outcomes were assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Poor outcome was defined as an SMFA function index greater than 10 points above the mean at 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Significant predictors of poor outcome were lower extremity nonunion [odds ratio (OR) = 3.082; P = 0.021], tobacco use (OR = 2.994; P = 0.009), worker's compensation insurance (OR = 3.986; P = 0.005), radiographic bone loss (OR = 2.397; P = 0.040), and preoperative SMFA function index (OR = 1.027; P = 0.001). The PRoFiT-NU model was significant and a good predictor of poor functional outcome (χ(5) = 51.98, P < 0.0005; area under the receiver operating curve = 0.79). Within the separate validation cohort, 16% of patients had a poor outcome at a PRoFiT-NU score below 25% (low risk), 39% of patients had a poor outcome at a PRoFiT-NU score between 25% and 50% (intermediate risk), and 63% of patients had a poor outcome at a PRoFiT-NU score above 50% (high risk).

CONCLUSIONS

The PRoFiT-NU score is an accurate predictor of poor functional outcome following fracture nonunion repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence description of levels of evidence.

Scoring of radiographic cortical healing with the radiographic humerus union measurement predicts union in humeral shaft fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine if the radiographic humerus union measurement (RHUM) is predictive of union in humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

All patients with long bone fracture nonunion presenting to a single surgeon were enrolled in a prospective registry. This registry was queried to identify patients with humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively and developed nonunion. The nonunion cohort was matched to a three to one gender- and age-matched control group that were treated nonoperatively for a humeral shaft fracture and achieved union. Two fellowship-trained orthopedic traumatologists blinded to eventual union scored radiographs obtained 12 weeks after injury using the RHUM. A binomial logistic regression determined the effect of the RHUM on the likelihood of developing union.

RESULTS

Nine patients with humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively with radiographs 12 weeks after injury that developed nonunion were identified. These patients were matched to 27 controls. Logistic regression demonstrated the RHUM was a significant predictor of healing 12 weeks after humeral shaft fracture treated nonoperatively (p = 0.014, odds ratio 9.434, 95% CI for OR 1.586-56.098). All patients with RHUM below 7 went on to nonunion. All patients with RHUM above 8 healed. Three of seven patients (43%) with RHUM of 7 or 8 healed.

CONCLUSION

The RHUM demonstrated an increased likelihood of achieving union 12 weeks after injury. Orthopedic surgeons can counsel patients that fractures with RHUM scores of 6 or below are in danger of developing nonunion and can target interventions appropriately.