Quantification of Postoperative Posterior Malleolar Fragment Reduction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography (Q3DCT) Determines Outcome in a Prospective Pilot Study of Patients With Rotational Type Ankle Fractures

Outcome measures after foot and ankle surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Research on outcomes measures after foot and ankle surgery is limited and methodological quality is not always assessed. We aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of patient-related outcome measures used in patients after foot- and ankle surgery.

METHODS

A Medline, Embase and Web of Sciences systematic review was performed including dates from 2000 up to April 2022. Inclusion criteria were foot and/or ankle surgery, described outcome(s) and it's assessed measurement properties. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the NOS-scale and the COSMIN-criteria.

RESULTS

143 studies (n = 18383) were included for final review, 82 about PROMs, 61 about clinical outcomes. A total of 23 different PROMs were evaluated, with a positive result in all measurement properties for the FAOS. There were positive results too for most measurement properties of the LEFS and the MOXFQ. Most clinical outcomes were radiological measures, with a high reliability for most measurements on plain radiographs and CT-scans.

CONCLUSIONS

To monitor foot and ankle outcome and evaluate treatment, we recommend the FAOS as the most suitable foot and ankle PROM.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

2.

Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Complex ankle fractures frequently involve the posterior malleolus. Many classifications describing posterior malleolar fractures (PMF) exist. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic literature review to outline existing PMF classifications and estimate their accuracy.

METHODS

The databases PubMed and Scopus were searched without time limits. Only specific PMF classifications were included; general ankle and/or pilon fracture classifications were excluded. Selection and data extraction was performed by three independent observers. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score.

RESULTS

A total of 110 studies with a total of 12.614 patients were included. Four main classifications were identified: Those describing the size of the posterior malleolar fracture (n = 66), Haraguchi (n = 44), Bartoníček/Rammelt (n = 21) and Mason (n = 12). The quality of the studies was moderate to good with a median Coleman-score of 43.5 (14-79) and a weighted median Coleman-score of 42.5 points. All classifications achieved a substantial to perfect score regarding the inter- and intraobserver reliability, with Mason scoring the lowest in comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the reviewed PMF classifications has been able to establish itself decisively in the literature. Most of the classifications are insufficient in terms of a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with regard to outcome. However, as the Bartoníček/Rammelt classification has the greatest potential due to its treatment algorithm, its reliability in combination with consistent predictive values, its usage in clinical practice and research appears advisable.

[Translated article] Posterior malleolar fractures: Indications and surgical approaches

Posterior malleolus fractures are frequent injuries, present in 7-44% of all ankle fractures. The objective of this study is to review the evidence to indicate the fixation of this fracture and to choose the appropriate surgical approach. The classic indications for fixation were fragment size greater than 25-30% of the articular surface and displacement greater than 2mm. However, current evidence suggests that, rather than size, factors such as syndesmotic instability, intra-articular step-off greater than 1-2mm, plafond impaction and the presence of intercalary fragments should be considered. When comparing the different surgical approaches, the literature supports the use of posterior approaches and reserves the recommendation of the traditional approach for exceptional cases. For the treatment of this injury it is essential to know the anatomy of the ankle and to consider all the factors described above, in addition to the presence of concomitant injuries.

Posterior malleolar fractures: Indications and surgical approaches

Posterior malleolus fractures are frequent injuries, present in 7-44% of all ankle fractures. The objective of this study is to review the evidence to indicate the fixation of this fracture and to choose the appropriate surgical approach. The classic indications for fixation were fragment size greater than 25-30% of the articular surface and displacement greater than 2 mm. However, current evidence suggests that, rather than size, factors such as syndesmotic instability, intra-articular step-off greater than 1-2 mm, plafond impaction and the presence of intercalary fragments should be considered. When comparing the different surgical approaches, the literature supports the use of posterior approaches and reserves the recommendation of the traditional approach for exceptional cases. For the treatment of this injury it is essential to know the anatomy of the ankle and to consider all the factors described above, in addition to the presence of concomitant injuries.

Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

In patients with ankle fractures, the presence of a posterior malleolar fracture has a negative impact on the prognosis. Computed tomography (CT) scanning is essential for fracture classification and treatment planning, as the indication for surgery depends on the 3-dimensional fragment outline and displacement, incisura involvement, and the presence of joint impaction. Anatomic reduction of a posterior malleolar fragment restores the incisura, facilitating reduction of the distal part of the fibula, and it also restores the integrity of the posterior portion of the syndesmosis, reducing the need for additional syndesmotic stabilization. Direct open reduction and fixation of posterior malleolar fragments from a posterior orientation is biomechanically more stable and provides a more accurate reduction than does indirect reduction and anterior-to-posterior screw fixation. Intra-articular step-off of >=2 mm is an independent risk factor for an inferior outcome and the development of posttraumatic arthritis, irrespective of the fragment size.

[Fracture of the posterior malleolus : A paradigm shift]

Ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior malleolus have a poor prognosis. The traditional concept of addressing the posterior fragment as the final step in the surgical reconstruction depending on the fragment size manifest in the lateral X‑ray, does not do justice to the anatomic and biomechanical relevance of the posterior malleolus. Intra-articular step-offs and fragment displacement ≥ 2 mm, impacted intercalary fragments, involvement of the fibular notch and instability of the syndesmosis, represent parameters relevant for the surgical reconstruction and the functional and radiomorphological outcome independent of fragment size. A valid assessment of these parameters can only be achieved via computed tomography (CT) including multiplanar 2D and 3D reconstruction. This is the foundation for the classification of posterior malleolar fractures according to Bartoníček et al., it forms the basis of the preoperative analysis of the fracture components and represents a decision-making tool for the indications for surgery. The individual fracture pattern guides the selection of the suitable approach or a combination of approaches and the surgical strategy. Making use of the posterior approaches enables the surgeon to have a direct view of the fracture components of the posterior malleolus as a precondition for an anatomic reduction. This central surgical step is frequently done as the first measure of the surgical reconstruction of the ankle joint. Furthermore, direct reduction and posterior stabilization is more accurate and stable than indirect reduction from an anterior approach with indirect fixation using lag screws. An additional temporary transfixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis is often dispensable.

Greater radial tuberosity size is associated with distal biceps tendon rupture: a quantitative 3-D CT case-control study

PURPOSE

During pronation, the distal biceps tendon and radial tuberosity internally rotate into the radioulnar space, reducing the linear distance between the radius and ulna by approximately 50%. This leaves a small space for the distal biceps tendon to move in and could possibly cause mechanical impingement or rubbing of the distal biceps tendon. Hypertrophy of the radial tuberosity potentially increases the risk of mechanical impingement of the distal biceps tendon. The purpose of our study was to determine if radial tuberosity size is associated with rupturing of the distal biceps tendon.

METHODS

Nine patients with a distal biceps tendon rupture who underwent CT were matched 1:2 to controls without distal biceps pathology. A quantitative 3-dimensional CT technique was used to calculate the following radial tuberosity characteristics: 1) volume in mm³, 2) surface area in mm², 3) maximum height in mm and 4) location (distance in mm from the articular surface of the radial head).

RESULTS

Analysis of the 3-dimensional radial tuberosity CT-models showed larger radial tuberosity volume and maximum height in the distal biceps tendon rupture group compared to the control group. Mean radial tuberosity volume in the rupture-group was 705 mm³ (SD: 222 mm³) compared to 541 mm³ (SD: 184 mm³) in the control group (p = 0.033). Mean radial tuberosity maximum height in the rupture-group was 4.6 mm (SD: 0.9 mm) compared to 3.7 mm (SD: 1.1 mm) in the control group, respectively (p = 0.011). There was no statistically significant difference in radial tuberosity surface area (ns) and radial tuberosity location (ns).

CONCLUSION

Radial tuberosity volume and maximum height were significantly greater in patients with distal biceps tendon ruptures compared to matched controls without distal biceps tendon pathology. This supports the theory that hypertrophy of the radial tuberosity plays a role in developing distal biceps tendon pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Posterior malleolar ankle fractures

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to address the hypothesis that fracture morphology might be more important than posterior malleolar fragment size in rotational type posterior malleolar ankle fractures (PMAFs). The secondary aim was to identify clinically important predictors of outcome for each respective PMAF-type, to challenge the current dogma that surgical decision-making should be based on fragment size.

METHODS

This observational prospective cohort study included 70 patients with operatively treated rotational type PMAFs, respectively: 23 Haraguchi Type I (large posterolateral-oblique), 22 Type II (two-part posterolateral and posteromedial), and 25 (avulsion-) Type III. There was no standardized protocol on how to address the PMAFs and CT-imaging was used to classify fracture morphology and quality of postoperative syndesmotic reduction. Quantitative 3D-CT (Q3DCT) was used to assess the quality of fracture reduction, respectively: the proportion of articular involvement; residual intra-articular: gap, step-off, and 3D-displacement; and residual gap and step-off at the fibular notch. These predictors were correlated with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at two-years follow-up.

RESULTS

Bivariate analyses revealed that fracture morphology (p = 0.039) as well as fragment size (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with the FAOS. However, in multivariate analyses, fracture morphology (p = 0.001) (but not fragment size (p = 0.432)) and the residual intra-articular gap(s) (p = 0.009) were significantly associated. Haraguchi Type-II PMAFs had poorer FAOS scores compared with Types I and III. Multivariate analyses identified the following independent predictors: step-off in Type I; none of the Q3DCT-measurements in Type II, and quality of syndesmotic reduction in small-avulsion Type III PMAFs.

CONCLUSION

PMAFs are three separate entities based on fracture morphology, with different predictors of outcome for each PMAF type. The current debate on whether or not to fix PMAFs needs to be refined to determine which morphological subtype benefits from fixation. In PMAFs, fracture morphology should guide treatment instead of fragment size. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1229-1241.