Modern perspectives of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures

Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Review of Anatomy, Classification, Management Strategies, and Complications

Proximal humerus fractures are prevalent in older adults, particularly women, primarily due to osteoporosis and increased fall risk. These fractures often result from low-energy falls in elderly patients, while in younger individuals, they are more likely to occur with high-energy trauma, which may involve additional injuries to soft tissue and neurovascular structures. Proper anatomical understanding, including key structures and blood supply, is crucial for effective management and to prevent complications. Several classification systems assist in guiding treatment for proximal humerus fractures, including Codman's, Neer's, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) system, and the Codman-Hertel system, which helps predict ischemia risk. Evaluation of proximal humerus fractures begins with Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols, emphasizing a thorough shoulder assessment, particularly focusing on skin integrity in elderly patients. Neurological and vascular examinations are essential due to the common occurrence of nerve injuries, especially involving the axillary nerve. Imaging typically includes multiple standard views, with advanced imaging reserved for complex cases and for assessing associated soft tissue injuries. Treatment options range from conservative management for stable fractures to surgical intervention for more complex cases. Surgical choices include techniques like fixation, nailing, and various arthroplasty options, with some procedures potentially offering advantages for older adults with bone quality or soft tissue challenges. Rehabilitation is a vital component of recovery, with emphasis on early mobility and gradual strengthening to restore function, especially in older patients. Complications following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for proximal humerus fractures can include issues such as non-union, malunion, osteonecrosis, infection, joint stiffness, and fixation failure. In cases where non-union or fixation failure occurs, revision surgery or arthroplasty may be necessary. Joint stiffness may require further intervention if physical therapy is insufficient, while symptomatic osteonecrosis might also need surgical management. Malunion is generally better tolerated in older patients but may require correction in younger individuals. Other surgical options, such as hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), share similar risks, including infection, fractures, complications at the tuberosity, stiffness, and instability. RSA may be favored when there are tuberosity or rotator cuff issues. Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning carries a high risk of pin migration and malunion, which can result in deformities, pain, and dysfunction. Proper anatomical knowledge is essential to avoid neurovascular injury and to manage common issues such as pin-site infections effectively.

Conservative treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: Can poor outcomes be predicted?

PURPOSE

3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures are frequently treated conservatively. This study aims to combine radiographic, and patient reported outcome data to identify factors leading to poor outcomes following conservative treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective local database analysis identified 3- and 4-part fractures. Radiographic and functional outcomes including Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), QuickDash (QD), Subjective Shoulder Score (SSV) and VAS pain scores were collected.

RESULTS

104 patients were included at mean follow-up of 55 months. Analysis highlighted significant OSS differences in 3- versus 4-part (p = 0.027), dominant arm injury (p = 0.046), age > 65 (p = 0.006), varus coronal neck-shaft angle < 115 versus 115-155 degrees (p = 0.008), posterior head tilt > 155 degrees (p = 0.005), greater tuberosity (GT) displacement > 5 mm (p = 0.001), GT comminution (p = 0.01), medial calcar hinge displacement > 2 mm (p = 0.032). According to QD scores; age > 65 (p = 0.012), varus neck-shaft angle (p = 0.01), GT displacement > 5 mm (p = 0.001), GT comminution (p = 0.01), medial calcar hinge displacement > 2 mm (p = 0.006). SSV varied significantly with 3- versus 4-part fractures (p = 0.005), age > 65 (p = 0.04), varus neck-shaft angle (p = 0.001), posterior head tilt (p = 0.005), GT displacement > 5 mm (p = 0.001), GT comminution (p = 0.003), and medial calcar hinge displacement > 2 mm (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We highlight risk factors for unfavourable outcomes following conservative management, aiding surgeons in shared decision-making and patient expectation management.

Trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures from 2010 to 2020

BACKGROUND

The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is continuing to rise due to shifts towards a more aged population as well as advancements in surgical treatment options. The purpose of this study is to examine and compare trends in the treatment of PHFs (nonoperative vs. operative; different surgical treatments) across different age groups over the last decade (2010-2020).

METHODS

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was queried using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify all patients presenting with or undergoing surgery for PHF between 2010 and 2020. Treatment trends, demographics, and insurance information were analyzed during the study period. Comparisons were made between operative and nonoperative trends with respect to the number and type of surgeries performed among 3 age groups: ≤49 years, 50-64 years, and ≥65 years. The rate of postoperative complications and reoperations was evaluated and compared among different surgical treatments for patients with a minimum 1-year postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 92,308 patients with a mean age of 67.8 ± 16.8 years were included. Over the last decade, there was no significant increase in the percentage of PHFs treated with surgery. A total of 15,523 PHFs (16.82%) were treated operatively, and these patients, compared with the nonoperative cohort, were younger (64.9 years vs. 68.4 years, P < .001), more likely to be White (80.2% vs. 74.7%, P < .001), and more likely to have private insurance (41.4% vs. 32.0%, P < .001). For patients ≤49 years old, trends in operative treatment have remained stable with internal fixation (IF) as the most used surgical modality. For patients 50-64 years old, we observed a gradual decline in the use of hemiarthroplasty (HA), with a corresponding increase in the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but IF continued to be the most used operative modality. In patients over 65 years, a steep decline in the use of IF and HA was noted during the first half of the decade along with a significant exponential increase in the use of rTSA, which surpassed the use of IF in 2019. Despite the increase in the use of rTSA, no differences in rate of surgical complications were noted between rTSA and IF (χ2 = 0.245, P = .621) or reoperations (χ2 = 0.112, P = .730).

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgical treatment remains the mainstay treatment of PHFs. Although there is no increase in the prevalence of operative treatment in patients ≥50 years in the last decade, there is an exponential increase in the use of rTSA with a corresponding decrease in HA and IF, a trend more substantial in patients ≥65 years compared with patients between 50 and 64 years.

Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture, particularly in older adults, accounting for approximately 5-6% of all fractures. This article provides a comprehensive review of PHFs, focusing on epidemiology, injury mechanism, clinical and radiographic assessment, classification systems, and treatment options. The incidence of PHFs varies across regions, with rates ranging from 45.7 to 60.1 per 100,000 person-years. Females are more susceptible to PHFs than males, and the incidence is highest in women over the age of 85. The injury mechanism of PHFs is typically bimodal, with high-energy injuries predominant in younger individuals and low-energy injuries in the elderly. Clinical assessment of PHFs involves obtaining a thorough history, physical examination, and evaluation of associated injuries, particularly neurovascular injuries. Radiographic imaging helps assess fracture displacement and plan for treatment. The Neer classification system is the most commonly used classification for PHFs, although other systems, such as AO/OTA, Codman-Hertel, and Resch classifications, also exist. The choice of treatment depends on factors such as patient age, activity level, fracture pattern, and surgeon expertise. Nonoperative management is typically preferred for elderly patients with minimal displacement, while operative fixation is considered for more complex fractures. Nonoperative treatment involves sling immobilization followed by physiotherapy, with good outcomes reported for certain fracture patterns. Operative management options include closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or arthroplasty. CRPP is suitable for specific fracture patterns, but the quality of reduction is crucial for favorable outcomes. ORIF is used when CRPP is not feasible, and various surgical approaches are available, each with its advantages and potential complications. PHFs are a significant clinical challenge due to their prevalence and complexity. Treatment decisions should be patient centered based on patient factors and fracture severity.

Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults-A Scoping Review

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture type in adults, with their incidence increasing over time. There are varied approaches to both the classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Optimal treatments for this fracture type are still widely open to debate. This review summarizes the current and historical treatment modalities for proximal humerus fractures. In this paper, we provide updates on the advances and trends in the epidemiology, classification, and operative and nonoperative treatments of proximal humerus fractures.

[Current trends in reverse fracture arthroplasty]

The reliable results of reverse arthroplasty have made this the preferred treatment method for non-reconstructable proximal humeral fractures. The individual consideration of the patient and the morphological features of the fractures are essential. Computed tomography (CT) images provide crucial information on the perfusion of the humeral head relevant for the prognosis and treatment. In this context a differentiation must be made between hard and soft criteria against a reconstruction. Tuberosities should be reduced whenever possible, because reverse arthroplasty with healed tuberosities provides a better range of motion and more strength for external rotation and anteversion, less complications and longer survival rates. In recent years the trend has been towards anatomical designs of prostheses with a humeral inclination of 135°. Revision rates for primary fracture prostheses are overall low with instability as the main reason for revision surgery, followed by periprosthetic fractures and infections. Reverse fracture arthroplasty has comparable or better clinical results compared to conservative treatment, osteosynthesis for geriatric patients, hemiarthroplasty and prosthesis implantation by elective surgery. Reverse arthroplasties, which were implanted in conditions of fracture sequelae, did not achieve significantly poorer clinical outcome at mid-term follow-up and can significantly improve shoulder function.

Biomechanical comparisons of hook plate and screw fixations in split-type greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus

BACKGROUND

Screws and plate are commonly utilized for the fixation of split-type humeral greater tuberosity (GT) fractures. However, the mechanical properties of these 2 types of fixation methods have not been compared directly. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the classic 2 screws fixation with hook locking plate from a mechanical perspective.

METHODS

Sixteen synthetic humerii (Sawbones Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA) were divided into 2 groups. An osteotomy was performed to simulate a split-type GT fracture. Group A (n = 8) was fixed with 2 standard parallel screws. Group B (n = 8) was fixed with a hook plate. Each specimen was tested with traction force at 45° shoulder abduction. Following the 20-N preload, a 500-cycle loading test was applied with a force ranging from 20 to 200 N (valley/peak), and the interfragmental displacement was measured periodically at intervals of 100 cycles. Finally, all the specimens were pulled with destructive force at a rate of 5 mm/min until catastrophic failure.

RESULTS

The hook plate exhibited greater construct stiffness than the screw fixation (63.2 ± 6.1 N/mm vs. 40.9 ± 3.4 N/mm, P < .001). All of the specimens completed the entire cyclic loading test without catastrophic failure, and the fragment displacement after 500 cycles was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm for the hook plate and 2.1 ± 0.3 mm for screw fixation, which was statistically lower in the plate group (P < .001). In terms of failure load, the hook plate group exhibited a significantly greater value than the screw group (770.6 ± 94.6 vs. 427.5 ± 45.1 N/mm, P < .001). The failure modes of both fixation methods were distinct.

CONCLUSION

In humeral GT fracture fixation, hook plate fixation appears to offer greater construct stiffness and failure load while maintaining fragment stability to resist a physiological traction force. The current study provides support from a mechanical perspective for the clinical application of the hook plate.

Outcomes of plate osteosynthesis for displaced 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures with deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach

PURPOSE

Three part and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus offer challenges in reduction and plate fixation, with considerable debate about use of Deltoid splitting (DS) and Delto-pectoral (DP) approaches, especially when they involving the greater tuberosity. We prospectively compared the results using DS approach and DP approach in these cases, with special focus on functional outcomes, complications, and ease of tuberosity reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 patients with three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture were alternately allocated the DP approach or DS approach for proximal humerus locking plate fixation. The outcome analysis was done by evaluating relative Constant score and ease of surgical reduction of greater tuberosity; radiological malunion was evaluated using Beredjiklian classification and complications were noted.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of 23 months (19-48 months), the mean 'relative Constant score was 74.27 ± 8.19 in the DP group and 73.26 ± 8.02 in the DS group and the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.988). There was no significant difference with respect to shoulder ROM, abductor strength, radiological malunion or complications. However, the mean surgical time was significantly less (p value = 0.042) in DS group (65 ± 5 min) in comparison to DP group (92 ± 4.3 min); significantly less difficulties were documented by the surgeon in reducing the greater tuberosity in DS group(p value = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although surgical time was reduced and greater tuberosity reduction was easier in DS group, the other outcomes were similar; either surgical approach can be used based, and can be based on the experience and comfort level of the surgeon.

Arthroscopic Repair of a Displaced Tuberosity Fragment After Proximal Humerus Locking Plate Fixation: A Case Report

CASE

Locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures is known to have high complication rates. Even a technically well-performed surgery can be subject to loss of reduction, which can lead to an adverse functional outcome for the patient. In this case report, we describe a patient who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humerus fracture complicated by delayed loss of reduction of a greater tuberosity fragment that was revised using arthroscopic techniques.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic repair of displaced greater tuberosity fragments after failed locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures can lead to good functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Complications and Long-Term Outcomes of Open Reduction and Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in adults remains controversial. We evaluated the risk of complications and the long-term outcomes in patients with a severely displaced fracture or a fracture-dislocation of the proximal part of the humerus treated with open reduction and plate fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2012, 5,897 consecutive patients with a proximal humeral fracture were referred to a specialist shoulder clinic for surgical assessment. Indications for surgery included anterior or posterior fracture-dislocation, substantial tuberosity involvement with >1 cm of displacement in a Neer 3 or 4-part fracture configuration, disengagement of the head from the shaft, or severe varus or valgus deformity of the head. All patients who met the surgical criteria and had been followed for 2 years were included, and standardized clinical and radiographic assessments of outcomes were performed. At a median of 10.8 years (range, 5 to 22 years) after ORIF, all surviving cognitively intact patients completed a patient-reported questionnaire assessing functional outcomes and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-eight patients (6.2%) met the inclusion criteria and had the appropriate follow-up. The study population had a high rate of complex fracture configurations; 77.2% had tuberosity involvement, 54.1% had complete head-shaft disengagement, and 44.0% had a dislocated head. Eighty-seven patients (23.6%) had postoperative stiffness, 25 (6.8%) had fixation failure/nonunion, and 16 (4.3%) had late osteonecrosis/posttraumatic osteoarthritis; these complications were the reason for the majority of the reoperations in the cohort. The survivorship until any reoperation was 74% at 10 years, but when reoperations for stiffness were excluded, the survivorship was 90% during the same time period. The patients' mean levels of pain, function, and satisfaction with treatment were good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of primary ORIF in medically fit patients with a severely displaced fracture or a fracture-dislocation of the proximal part of the humerus in centers where the expertise to carry out such treatment exists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical trends in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures in South Korea: a population-based study

Background

It is known that there are large regional variations in treatment methods for the management of proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate the national surgical trends in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures in South Korea.

Methods

We analyzed the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database from 2008 to 2016. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes and procedure codes were used to identify patients aged ≥65 years with proximal humeral fractures.

Results

A total of 69,120 proximal humeral fractures were identified from 2008 to 2016. The overall operative rate for proximal humeral fractures increased steadily from 24.6% in 2008 to 36.8% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The rate of cases treated with open reduction and internal fixation tended to increase each year, from 71.5% of the overall surgeries in 2008 to 85.6% in 2016; conversely, the rate of cases treated with closed reduction and internal fixation tended to decrease from 19.9% in 2008 to 4.5% in 2016. In terms of type of arthroplasty procedure, the rate of cases treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty tended to increase significantly each year, from 8.2% of the overall arthroplasty procedures in 2008 to 52.0% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was shown to increase especially in patients aged 80 years or older.

Conclusion

Overall, our findings indicated that surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures, particularly by open reduction and internal fixation, continues to increase; in terms of type of arthroplasty procedure, the rate of cases treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty tended to increase.

Displaced humeral surgical neck fractures: classification and results of third-generation percutaneous intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

The high rates of complications and reoperations observed with the early designs of first-generation (unlocked) and second-generation (bent design) humeral intramedullary nail (IMNs) have discouraged their use by most surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a third-generation (straight, locking, low-profile, tuberosity-based fixation) IMN, inserted through a percutaneous approach, for the treatment of displaced 2-part surgical neck fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent placement of a third-generation IMN to treat a displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture (AO/OTA type 11A3). The mean age at surgery was 57 years (range, 17-84 years). After percutaneous insertion through the humeral head, the IMN was used as a reduction tool. Static locking fixation was achieved after axial fracture compression ("back-slap" hammering technique). Patients were reviewed and underwent radiography with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 12-53 months).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 3 types of surgical neck fractures were observed: with valgus head deformity (Type A = 8 cases), shaft translation without head deformity (Type B = 19 cases), or with varus head deformity (Type C = 14 cases). At final follow-up, all fractures went on to union, and the mean humeral neck-shaft angle was 132° ± 5°. We observed 2 malunions and 1 case of partial humeral head avascular necrosis. No cases underwent screw migration or intra-articular penetration. At last review, mean active forward elevation was 146° (range, 90°-180°) and mean external rotation was 50° (range, 20°-80°). The mean Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value were 71 (range, 43-95) and 80% (range, 50%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade insertion of a third-generation IMN through a percutaneous approach provides a high rate of fracture healing, excellent clinical outcome scores, and a low rate of complications. No morbidity related to the passage of the nail through the supraspinatus muscle and the cartilage was observed. The proposed A, B, and C classification allows choosing the optimal entry point for intramedullary nailing.

Proximal Humeral Locking Plates: A Cadaveric Study of 5 Versus 7 Metaphyseal Locking Screws

The most common operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures is internal fixation with fixed-angle locking plates. Although this surgical technique has been refined, a significant failure rate remains. This study aimed to determine whether the number of locking screws in the humeral head affects the biomechanical strength and stability of the construct in bone from elderly individuals. Ten pairs of embalmed cadaveric humeri were osteotomized in a gap model and fixed with periarticular locking plates placed in the standard position. Five or 7 proximal locking screws were inserted. Mechanical testing was performed, and cyclic displacements and maximum force to failure were recorded. No significant difference was found between 5 and 7 locking screws in mean cyclic displacement on the medial (1.09 mm vs 1.12 mm, P=.834) or posterior (0.45 mm vs 0.42 mm, P=.791) sides of the fracture model. On testing to failure, 7 and 5 screws showed similar stiffness (336 N/mm vs 292 N/mm, P=.176), force at ultimate load (745 N vs 662 N, P=.309), and displacement at ultimate load (5.90 mm vs 4.36 mm, P=.080). All samples failed at diaphyseal fixation, and no screw cutout or varus collapse was observed. Results from this study suggest that there is no significant difference between 5 and 7 metaphyseal locking screws for stiffness of fixation of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. With the inherent possibility of screw penetration of the humeral head, fewer screws may lead to fewer complications. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):306-311.].

Reverse total shoulder versus angular stable plate treatment for proximal humeral fractures in over 65 years old patients

Background

Treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures is still under debate. Poor rotator cuff status and non-union of the tubercles in elderly patients has caused reversed total shoulder prosthesis growing popularity and showed promising results, even in comparison to angular stable plates fixation.The purpose of this study is to report clinical and radiological results of proximal humerus fractures treated with rTSA or ORIF in elderly.

Materials and methods

The study has investigated retrospectively a consecutive series of 73 patients over 65 years old (range 65-91) with proximal humeral three- and four- parts fractures, operated from January 2009 to June 2014 with a reversed total shoulder prosthetic replacement or open reduction and internal fixation using an angular stable plate, with at least 1 year follow-up. Participants are admitted in our hospital with a displaced proximal humeral fracture according to AO-OTA type 11-B2 or 11-C2.The primary outcomes are active ROM and shoulder function (Constant score). Secondary outcomes have been patient self-assessment form (Simple shoulder test) and radiographical details. Follow-up takes place at the moment of clinical observation with rx control.

Results

We analyzed a group of 23 patients treated by plate and screws and 21 patients treated by rTSA with these average results. ORIF: Flexion 112.8°, Abduction 99.6°, External rotation at 90° 47.4°, modal Internal rotation hand at Sacroiliac joint, Constant Score 52.9 and Simple Shoulder Test 8.0. RSA: Flexion 133.3°, Abduction 101.4°, External rotation at 90° of abduction 35.5°, modal Internal rotation hand at waist (L3), Constant Score 65.9 and Simple Shoulder Test 9.2. No nerve injuries were reported. No cases of pseudoarthrosis or plate fractures. No arthroplasty implant loosening, infection or dislocation was documented and revision required.

Conclusion

Our study shows good clinical outcomes and fewer complications in both treatment options. Better clinical and daily living results are reported in RSA compared with ORIF, confirming that rTSA is one of the best treatment in proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients, which rotator cuff status frequently is poor and degenerating. The few radiological complications do not seem to have influence on active ROM and Constant Score, both the first and the second group of patients.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Case Series, Surgical.

Trends in Surgical Management and Costs for Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly

Proximal humerus fractures in the elderly are increasing in frequency as the population ages. The purpose of this study was to investigate surgical and cost trends in the Medicare population. The PearlDiver database was queried using diagnosis codes to identify Medicare recipients with proximal humerus fractures from 2005 to 2012. Surgical trends, demographics, and charge/reimbursement data were analyzed. There were 750,426 proximal humerus fractures in Medicare recipients during the 8-year period. Eighty-five percent of the fractures were treated nonoperatively; however, the percentage of operative vs nonoperative management increased significantly over time for all fractures, isolated fractures, and fracture dislocations. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was the most common surgical treatment and remained constant. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) increased by 406% and hemiarthroplasty (HEMI) decreased by 47%. Compared with younger patients, older patients were more likely to undergo HEMI or RTSA than to undergo ORIF for isolated fractures and fracture dislocations. Charges and reimbursements from Medicare increased over time. The charge to reimbursement gap increased from 87% in 2005 to 104% in 2012. Charges were higher for RTSA than for ORIF or HEMI. Nonoperative management was the treatment of choice for 85% of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly; however, there was a trend toward higher rates of surgery. The RTSA rate increased and the HEMI rate decreased, while ORIF remained constant. There was an increasing charge to reimbursement ratio for all procedure types. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e641-e647.].

Biomechanical Contribution of Tension-Reducing Rotator Cuff Sutures in 3-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Using a cadaveric 3-part fracture model and cyclic loading protocol, our study objectives were to quantify the stabilizing effect of tension-reducing rotator cuff sutures in terms of fracture displacement across the surgical neck and greater tuberosity compared with a control group in which no sutures were used.

METHODS

Six matched pairs of fresh frozen specimens underwent a standardized, 3-part, proximal humerus fracture and were split into 2 groups. The control group had the fracture fixed with a plate and screw construct only while the experimental group had additional suture fixation through the plate to each rotator cuff tendon. Active abduction through the rotator cuff was simulated for 100, 200, 300, and 400 cycles and to failure at 1000 N. A Mann-Whitney U test compared cyclic displacement of the greater tuberosity and surgical neck fracture gaps and load to failure between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in fracture gap between fixation methods at the surgical neck at 100 (P = 0.13), 200 (P = 0.07), 300 (P = 0.49), and 400 (P = 0.07) cycles. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between fixation methods in the fracture gap at the greater tuberosity at 100 (P = 0.39), 200 (P = 1.00), 300 (P = 0.31), and 400 (P = 0.59) cycles. There was no significant difference (P > 0.5) at 1000 N at the surgical neck (P = 0.70) or the greater tuberosity (P = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Tension-relieving rotator cuff sutures do not add stability to the repair of 3-part proximal humerus fractures. Varus collapse and greater tuberosity displacement are common complications associated with 3-part fractures. No mechanical data exist to demonstrate benefit of adding suture to a plate and screw construct for limiting fracture displacement.

Orthopaedic approaches to proximal humeral fractures following trauma

Proximal humeral fractures have been a topic of discussion in medical literature dating back as far as 3rd century BC. Today, these fractures are the most common type of humeral fractures and account for about 5-6% of all fractures in adults with the incidence rising rapidly with age. In broad terms the management of proximal humeral fractures can be divided into two categories: conservative versus surgical intervention. The aim of treatment is to stabilize the fracture, aid better union and reduce pain during the healing process. Failure to achieve this can result in impairment of function, and significantly weaken the muscles inserting onto the proximal humerus. With the rising incidence of proximal humeral fractures, especially among the elderly, the short and long term burden for patients as well as the wider society is increasing. Furthermore, there is a lack of consistency in the definitive treatment and management of displaced fractures. This systematic review of literature compares the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with their conservative management, by evaluating the available randomised controlled trials on this topic.

Clinical investigation for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: a randomized study of two surgical treatments: reverse total prosthetic replacement versus angular stable plate Philos (The DELPHI-trial)

BACKGROUND

Treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures is still under debate. Few studies exist at the highest level of evidence. Although reversed total shoulder prosthesis has gained popularity and showed promising results in the treatment for proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients, no randomized controlled trials exist to the authors' knowledge.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a randomized semi-blinded controlled multicenter trial designed according to the Consort statement and the recommendations given by the Cochrane reviewers for proximal humeral fractures. The study will investigate whether a reversed total shoulder prosthetic replacement gain better functional outcome compared to open reduction and internal fixation using an angular stable plate in displaced three- and four parts proximal humeral fractures after two and five years follow-up.Participants are aged 65-85 admitted in seven different hospitals with a displaced proximal humeral fracture according to AO-OTA type 11-B2 or 11-C2. The intervention group is surgical treatment using a reversed total shoulder prosthesis (Delta X-tend) compared to open reduction and internal fixation with an angular stable plate (Philos) and thread cerclage in the control group. 60 patients will be randomized to each group.The primary outcome is shoulder function (Constant score). Secondary outcomes will be patient self-assessment form (Oxford shoulder score), a quality of life questionnaire (15D score) and resource implications (cost-effectiveness). Follow-ups take place at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, and five years. The trial design is semi-blinded with blinded physiotherapists performing the functional testing of patients at all follow-ups.Randomization to treatment groups is electronic online, by independent supervisor (web-CRF). The recruitment of patients started at January 1.st 2013. Inclusion of 120 patients during three years is expected.

DISCUSSION

This semiblinded trial include a high number of patients compared to existing randomized trials in this field. To our knowledge and according to ClinicalTrials.gov, this is the first study that compare these two treatments for a displaced proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. This may provide important information to help the surgeon to decide the best treatment in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01737060.

No Contribution of Tension-Reducing Rotator Cuff Sutures on Locking Plate Fixation in a 2-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Model

OBJECTIVES

Varus failure is a well-known complication of open reduction internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures. The addition of tension-reducing sutures from the plate to the rotator cuff may attenuate the deforming forces of the rotator cuff resulting in decreased varus failure. In this study, we investigate the biomechanical contributions of tension-reducing sutures to a locked plate construct in a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model.

METHODS

Two fixation techniques were tested in 12 matched fresh frozen humeri in which standard 2-part fractures of the surgical neck were created with a gap simulating surgical neck medial comminution. In group 1, fractures were fixed with a standard proximal humerus locking plate. In group 2, the plate fixation was similar, and additionally, tension-reducing sutures were applied from the plate to the rotator cuff. Active abduction was simulated for 400 cycles with force applied through the rotator cuff tendons. Intercyclic fracture motion, change in displacement, and load to failure were recorded.

RESULTS

The addition of tension-reducing sutures did not lead to significant differences in intercyclic fracture motion. The mean change in displacement and load to failure were similar in both groups. Failure typically occurred in both groups at the rotator cuff testing clamp interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Tension-relieving rotator cuff sutures added to locking plate fixation did not lead to a change in fracture gap with cyclic loading or an increase in ultimate failure load in a 2-part surgical neck proximal humerus fracture model without medial support.

The outcome of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly

This study describes the epidemiology and outcome of 637 proximal humeral fractures in 629 elderly (≥ 65 years old) patients. Most were either minimally displaced (n = 278, 44%) or two-part fractures (n = 250, 39%) that predominantly occurred in women (n = 525, 82%) after a simple fall (n = 604, 95%), who lived independently in their own home (n = 560, 88%), and one in ten sustained a concomitant fracture (n = 76, 11.9%). The rate of mortality at one year was 10%, with the only independent predictor of survival being whether the patient lived in their own home (p = 0.025). Many factors associated with the patient’s social independence significantly influenced the age and gender adjusted Constant score one year after the fracture. More than a quarter of the patients had a poor functional outcome, with those patients not living in their own home (p = 0.04), participating in recreational activities (p = 0.01), able to perform their own shopping (p < 0.001), or able to dress themselves (p = 0.02) being at a significantly increased risk of a poor outcome, which was independent of the severity of the fracture (p = 0.001).

A poor functional outcome after a proximal humeral fracture is not independently influenced by age in the elderly, and factors associated with social independence are more predictive of outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:970–7.

Operative versus nonoperative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures

This updated meta-analysis investigated whether operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures. The authors searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE. Randomized controlled trials that evaluated operative vs nonoperative treatment for exclusively 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures were considered. Six studies with a total of 287 patients who had proximal humeral fractures were included. According to the meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences were found between operative and nonoperative treatment in Constant-Murley shoulder scores (Constant scores); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores; total complication events; mortality; infection; nonunion; avascular necrosis; osteoarthritis; redisplacement of fractures; or dislocation or resorption of tuberosity. For health-related quality of life, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) favored operative treatment, but 15D scores showed no significant difference. Compared with nonoperative treatment, open reduction and internal fixation required significantly more additional surgeries (risk ratio, 6.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-27.50; P=.01), and more penetrations into joint space occurred (risk ratio, 9.56; 95% confidence interval, 2.27-40.13; P=.002). The limited evidence suggests that no convincing findings support the use of either open reduction and internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. The findings of the current study should be interpreted cautiously because of the modest sample size and the short follow-up period.

Evolution of treatment of of the proximal humerus fractures (review)

The article in generalized form acquaints with the publications devoted to the bases of proximal humeral fractures treatment. A brief digression on anatomy and biomechanics of the humeral joint allows to consider the main morphological features of it. The most commonly used classification of proximal humeral fractures concisely classify many types of damage. According to the clinical and anatomical characteristics of fractures tracked the historical aspect, the development and the current state of the most common methods of treatment. In his review collected works authors share their experience in the application of methods. It allows to further the perspective directions.

Functional outcomes following locking plate fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of patients with complex proximal humeral fractures fixated by locking plate technology. Eighty-nine patients (27 men, 62 women) older than 50 years with 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures were treated using locking plate fixation and followed up for more than 1 year. Functional outcomes were assessed by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Constant scores, and the complications were evaluated through physical and radiographic examinations. Mean DASH and Constant scores for all 89 patients were 19.6 and 66.6 points, respectively. No significant differences existed in the 2 scores between patients with 3- and 4-part fractures. Of the 71 patients without complications, 68 had an excellent functional outcome according to the DASH score, whereas 2 patients had an excellent outcome on the Constant score. For the 18 patients with complications, the functional outcomes were significantly poorer compared with patients without complications. According to the Constant score, all patients with complications were classified into a moderate or poor functional outcome, but the rate was 12% with the DASH score. In patients with 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures fixed with locking plate fixation, complications were the major cause of compromised functional outcomes. Based on these results, different conclusions would be reached when the functional outcome was assessed by using the DASH and Constant scores separately. Because the clinician-based Constant score may bias the results, patient-based assessments, such as the DASH score, are required for the evaluation of functional outcome after shoulder surgery.

Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures

The treatment of proximal humerus fractures continues to evolve. While the many of these injuries can be managed nonoperatively, a certain percentage require operative treatment. Open reduction internal fixation can offer excellent outcomes when performed in the appropriate patient and utilizing proper techniques. This article reviews the most up-to-date literature regarding all phases of proximal humerus fracture osteosynthesis, including diagnosis, imaging, anatomic considerations, surgical indications, fixation, and surgical outcomes.

Internal fixation versus shoulder hemiarthroplasty for displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients

The purpose of this single-center, randomized, controlled trial was to report on the 2-year outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with either a locking plate or shoulder hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-two patients (87% women) with a mean age of 71.9 years (range, 67-86 years) were treated with ORIF with either a locking plate or shoulder hemiarthroplasty after shoulder injury. The main outcome measures were the Constant score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) according to the EQ-5D (EuroQol Group, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). At final 2-year follow-up, DASH and pain scores favored the shoulder hemiarthroplasty group. Mean flexion was 129° in the shoulder hemiarthroplasty group and 117° in the ORIF group (P=.27), and mean abduction was 123° in the shoulder hemiarthroplasty group and 111° in the ORIF group (P=.41). In the shoulder hemiarthroplasty group, the EQ-5D index score decreased from 0.85±0.21 before injury to 0.65±0.14 at 4 months postoperatively. The score was 0.79±0.24 at 12 months postoperatively and 0.81±0.17 at 24 months postoperatively. The results of this study indicate an advantage in functional outcomes and HRQoL favoring shoulder hemiarthroplasty compared with ORIF with a locking plate, although most outcomes were not significantly different.