Outcomes of nails versus plates for humeral shaft fractures: a Medicare cohort study

Return to play and outcomes of surgically treated upper limb nerve entrapment in athletes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Athletes face a higher risk of upper limb nerve entrapment due to repetitive stress, trauma, and biomechanics. Diagnosis is challenging, and delayed treatment can impair performance. When conservative care fails, surgery may be needed to restore function and enable return to play (RTP).

METHODS

This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and evaluated surgical outcomes, RTP rates, and complications in athletes with upper limb nerve entrapment. A comprehensive search was conducted using MeSH terms and keywords for surgical interventions, nerve entrapment syndromes, and sports. Eligible studies included case series, cohort studies, and comparative studies that reported postoperative outcomes in athletes. Data extraction included nerve involvement, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and RTP rates.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies, comprising 1,297 athletes across 23 sports, were included. The most common nerve entrapments involved the ulnar nerve (50.1%), brachial plexus (39.2%), and suprascapular nerve (9.5%). Surgical interventions included ulnar nerve decompression/transposition, first rib resection with scalenectomy for thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), and suprascapular nerve decompression. RTP rates ranged from 62 to 100%, with an average of 87%. Suprascapular nerve decompression had the highest RTP success (100%), while TOS demonstrated greater variability (62.5-97%). Functional improvements included pain reduction, increased grip strength, and enhanced patient-reported outcomes. The overall complication rate was low, but TOS procedures had the highest reoperation rates (3.8-27%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of upper limb nerve entrapment in athletes yields high RTP rates and functional recovery. Ulnar and suprascapular nerve decompressions show consistent success, while TOS surgery outcomes vary.

Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation in the Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of intramedullary nailing (IMN) and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) in treating traumatic humeral shaft fractures in adults (18 years and above). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The primary outcome was time to union, while secondary outcomes included non-union rates, incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy, surgical site infections, and intra-operative comminution. Twenty-six studies, encompassing 1,674 patients (867 IMN, 807 ORIF), were included. IMN demonstrated a shorter time to union compared to ORIF (mean difference -1.06 (95% CI, -1.88 to -0.23)), with significant statistical heterogeneity (I² = 70%), and a mean difference of -2.14 (95% CI, -3.16 to -1.12) in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) subgroup analysis, which had no significant statistical heterogeneity. Both techniques had comparable non-union rates (risk ratio 0.34 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.93)). IMN was associated with lower incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy (risk ratio 0.48 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.87)) and surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.44 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.76)), but had a higher risk of intra-operative comminution (risk ratio 3.04 (95% CI, 1.24 to 7.44)). The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity and varying outcome measures, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation. IMN offers rapid fracture stabilization and minimal additional physiological insult, while ORIF remains preferable for achieving precise anatomical reduction. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient-specific factors and surgical expertise in selecting the appropriate fixation technique.

Dynamic Compression Plating Versus Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing for the Treatment of OTA/AO 12-A Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the humerus diaphysis are common and often result from motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Treatment methods range from nonoperative approaches to various operative techniques, including antegrade intramedullary nailing (AIMN) and dynamic compression plate (DCP) fixation. This study aimed to compare the cost effectiveness and outcomes of plating and nailing for humerus diaphyseal fractures.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study involving 59 cases of humerus diaphyseal OTA/AO 12-A fractures was conducted at King Saud Medical City (KSMC), a level I trauma center located in the center region in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients treated with AIMN, anterolateral plating, or posterior plating were included. Data on demographics, clinical parameters, radiographic healing, and costs were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The average surgical duration was shorter in the AIMN group compared to the anterolateral and posterior plating groups but with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The average length of stay (LOS) was shorter, and the change in hemoglobin levels was lower in the AIMN group when compared to other groups but without a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The average cost of AIMN was significantly higher than that of anterolateral and posterior plating groups (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

 While both nailing and plating procedures are options for treating OTA/AO 12-A fractures, AIMN carries a higher overall procedural cost. The practice of drain placement in our study population is likely the cause of the increased LOS in the plating groups. Relative additional analgesic requirements were associated with AIMN. Surgeons should consider meticulous hemostasis to avoid drain placement, which can decrease LOS, thus possibly decreasing unnecessary treatment costs of humerus shaft fractures.

Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with different treatment methods: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Humeral shaft fractures (HSFs) can be treated non-operatively (Non-OP), with open reduction and plate osteosynthesis (ORPO), minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), or with intramedullary nails (IMN). However, the best treatment for HSFs still remains controversial.We performed a network meta-analysis to explore which should be the best method for HSFs.

METHODS

The computerized search had been conducted on electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Medline from the establishment of the database to the end of December 2022. The quality evaluation of the included literature had been completed by Review Manager (version 5.4.1). Stata 17.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA)was used for network meta-analysis.We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different treatments to treating HSFs.

RESULTS

The pairwise comparison results demonstrated that there was no statistical difference between IMN, MIPO, Non-OP, and ORPO in terms of radial nerve injury and infection, and Non-OP presented significantly more nonunion than ORPO, IMN, and MIPO. However, no statistically significant difference between ORPO, IMN, and MIPO was discovered. The results of the network meta-analysis displayed that surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities of IMN, MIPO, Non-OP, and ORPO in radial nerve injury were 46.5%, 66.9%, 77.3%, and 9.3%, respectively, in contrast, that in infection were 68.6%, 53.3%, 62.4%, and 15.4%, respectively, and that in nonunion were 51.7%, 93.1%, 0.7%, and 54.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We came to the conclusion that MIPO is currently the most effective way to treat HSFs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of the registry: Prospero, 2. Unique Identifying number or registration ID: CRD42023411293.

Percutaneous Intramedullary Nailing of Complex Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Humeral diaphyseal fractures have been traditionally stabilized with plates and screws. However, surgical morbidity can be quite extensive, particularly in more complex segmental and comminuted fracture patterns. An intramedullary nail (IMN) has the biomechanical advantage of being a load-sharing device and can be placed with a more minimally invasive technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of complex humeral shaft fractures treated with an IMN utilizing a percutaneous surgical technique.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent treatment of a complex humeral shaft fracture with an IMN placed with a percutaneous technique. Clinical outcome scores and radiographic analysis were performed at a minimum one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 14 patients included, 12 had clinical and radiographic follow-ups at one year. The majority (64%) were obese and involved polytrauma (50%), and 79% were AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type C fractures. Union after the index procedure was 93%, with one nonunion requiring a secondary operation. The average operative time was 103 minutes. There were no other complications or additional procedures. The mean clinical outcome scores included American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES): 78.2, Constant Score: 72.1, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE): 81.9, and Penn Shoulder Score: 82.7.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates complex comminuted and segmental humeral shaft fractures in a higher-risk patient population can be effectively managed with IMN. Percutaneous placement of an IMN should be considered as a treatment option in complex humeral shaft fractures, particularly in patients with secondary comorbidities such as obesity and polytrauma.

Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population

Limb lengthening has not been widely employed in the elderly population due to concerns that outcomes will be inferior. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective case-control series was to report the bone healing outcomes and complications of lower limb lengthening in older patients (≥60 years) using magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail (MILN). Our hypothesis was that healing parameters including consolidation days, the consolidation index, maturation days, and the maturation index, as well as the number of adverse events reported in the older population, would be no different to those of the general adult population. We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs from patients ≥60 years of age with limb-length discrepancies who underwent femoral or tibial lengthening using a MILN. Parameters were compared among the age categories “≤19 years,” “20–39 years,” “40–59 years,” or “≥60 years” and propensity-matched cohorts for the age groups 20–59 years and ≥60 years. Complications were reported as percentages for each age category. In the study period, 354 MILN were placed in 257 patients. Sixteen nails were placed in patients 60 years of age or older (mean 65 ± 5 years; range 60–72 years). Comparisons of healing parameters showed no difference between those aged 60+ and the younger cohort. Complication percentages were not statistically significant (p = 0.816). Limb lengthening with MILN may therefore be considered a safe and feasible option for a generally healthy elderly population.

Dual Magnetically Expandable Intramedullary Nails for Treatment of a Large Bony Defect in a Patient with Sarcoma: A Case Report

Aim

To describe the surgical technique of performing an all-internal lengthening to address a large diaphyseal femur defect in the sarcoma patient.

Background

Various strategies exist to address large intercalary bone defects with various biomechanical and biological implications.

Case description

A 23-year-old female with high-grade osteosarcoma of her left femur underwent wide resection and an internal reconstruction of a 12.5-cm femoral defect using dual magnetic lengthening intramedullary nails resulting in restoration of leg lengths, and pre-resection function with minimal residual disability.

Conclusion

Preoperative chemotherapy, wide resection and post-operative chemotherapy for osteosarcoma are the current standard of care. Resection often leads to large bone defects requiring complex reconstruction. Following intercalary bone resection, biological reconstruction is a consideration. An all-inside technique was developed in an effort to minimise complications of long-term external fixation for distraction osteogenesis, or extensile secondary grafting procedures for induced membrane strategy.

Clinical significance

This previously unreported surgical technique allows for an all-internal lengthening of large diaphyseal bone defects. While specifically used in an oncologic post-resection setting, this technique is applicable to the broader limb reconstruction and lengthening practice and overcomes some inherent limitations to previously described techniques.

How to cite this article

Copp J, Magister S, Napora J, et al. Dual Magnetically Expandable Intramedullary Nails for Treatment of a Large Bony Defect in a Patient with Sarcoma: A Case Report. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):189-194.

Ultrasound-guided preoperative localization of radial nerve in the treatment of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures

Background

The aim of this study was to discuss the treatment of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures using ultrasound-guided preoperative localization of radial nerve.

Methods

Between May 2010 and December 2019, 56 patients with extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty eight patients were received examination by using preoperative localization of radial nerve guided by ultrasound-guided preoperative localization (group A) and 28 control patients without ultrasound-guided (group B). All patients were treated surgically for distal humeral shaft fractures by posterior approach techniques. Operative time, radial nerve exposure time, intraoperative bleeding volume, union time and iatrogenic radial nerve palsy rate were compared between the two groups. Elbow function was also evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results

A significant difference was observed between the two groups, Operative time (113.25 min vs 135.86 min) (P < 0.001), radial nerve exposure time (20.82 min vs 32.53 min) (P < 0.001), intraoperative bleeding volume (246.80 ml vs 335.52 ml) (P < 0.001). However, iatrogenic radial nerve palsy rate (3.6% vs 7.1%) (P = 0.129), the fracture union time (13.52 months vs 12.96 months) (P = 0.796) and the MEPS score (87.56 vs 86.38) (P = 0.594) were no significantly different in both groups.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided preoperative localization is an effective approach in the treatment of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fracture by revealing radial nerve, which may help reduce the operative time, radial nerve exposure time and the intraoperative bleeding volume.

Early Experience in Pathologic Humerus Fracture Treated With the Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System Shows Limitations Related to Patient Selection

Impending and complete pathologic fractures often necessitate surgical fixation. Traditional orthopedic implants are commonly used, achieving clinically acceptable outcomes, but their metallic composition can impair radiographic evaluation and affect radiation treatments. Recognition of these concerns led to the development of radiolucent implants such as the minimally invasive Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System (PBSS; IlluminOss Medical Inc), featuring a light cured polymer contained within an inflatable balloon catheter. Two participating hospitals in one health care system reviewed cases using the PBSS implant. Twenty-five patients with 29 impending or pathologic fractures in the proximal radius or humerus from metastatic carcinoma, myeloma, lymphoma, and melanoma were identified. Clinical charts and imaging were reviewed to determine the status of the implant at final follow-up as well as complications. For analysis, a chi-square test was used for nominal variables and a t test was used for continuous variables. Eleven of the 25 patients were alive with disease at the time of analysis. Eight of 29 (27.5%) implants failed. Five of 25 (20%) patients required repeat surgery due to complications, including 3 revision open reduction and internal fixations, 1 open reduction and internal fixation for a periprosthetic fracture, and 1 screw removal. Five of the 9 cases (56%) (P=.03) with lesions in the distal humeral shaft had breakage of the implant by final follow-up, compared with 3 of 20 cases (15%) (P=.03) elsewhere in the humerus; no failures were seen in the radius. One of 4 patients (25%) also had failure in the surgical neck, although this did not reach significance. Five patients were noted to have progression of disease on follow-up radiographs, with 4 failures in patients with progression. The PBSS implants potentially allow improved surveillance of fracture healing and tumor recurrence along with decreased scattering of radiation during treatment. Unfortunately, there may be a higher rate of mechanical failures, particularly for lesions involving the distal humerus. This may be due to decreased cross-sectional area of the implant in this region as compared with the metaphyseal and proximal regions. Caution should be exercised when treating distal humeral pathologic fractures with large lytic lesions where the underlying disease process is not well controlled. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):154-159.].

Open plate fixation versus nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised clinical trials and observational studies

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis compares open reduction and internal fixation with a plate (ORIF) versus nailing for humeral shaft fractures with regard to union, complications, general quality of life and shoulder/elbow function.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL/CINAHL was searched for observational studies and randomised clinical trials (RCT). Effect estimates were pooled across studies using random effects models. Results were presented as weighted odds ratio (OR) or risk difference (RD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Subgroup analysis was performed stratified for study design (RCTs and observational studies).

RESULTS

Eighteen observational studies (4906 patients) and ten RCT's (525 patients) were included. The pooled effect estimates of observational studies were similar to those obtained from RCT's. More patients treated with nailing required re-intervention (RD 2%; OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.0-3.8) with shoulder impingement being the most predominant indication (17%). Temporary radial nerve palsy secondary to operation occurred less frequently in the nailing group (RD 2%; OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.6). Notably, all but one of the radial nerve palsies resolved spontaneously in each groups. Nailing leads to a faster time to union (mean difference - 1.9 weeks, 95% CI - 2.9 to - 0.9), lower infection rate (RD 2%; OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.7) and shorter operation duration (mean difference - 26 min, 95% CI - 37 to - 14). No differences were found regarding non-union, general quality of life, functional shoulder scores, and total upper extremity scores.

CONCLUSION

Nailing carries a lower risk of infection, postoperative radial nerve palsy, has a shorter operation duration and possibly a shorter time to union. Shoulder impingement requiring re-intervention, however, is an inherent disadvantage of nail fixation. Notably, absolute differences are small and almost all patients with radial nerve palsy recovered spontaneously. Satisfactory results can be achieved with both treatment modalities.

Variation in management of humeral and clavicular shaft fractures amongst fellowship trained orthopedic traumatologists

Background

There exists a wide variety of opinions on the appropriate management of diaphyseal humeral and clavicular fractures amongst orthopedic surgeons.

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a preference amongst orthopedic traumatologists on treatment of diaphyseal humerus and clavicle fractures with respect to various patient populations.

Methods

A 6-question survey was created using Surveymonkey.com and distributed via the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) website to fellowship trained orthopedic surgery traumatologists to survey the preferred management of a simple oblique middle 1/3rd diaphyseal humerus fracture and a middle 1/3rd displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture in the following 3 clinical settings: a healthy laborer, an older patient with co-morbidities, and if the surgeon themselves sustained the injury. The ratio of operative to non-operative management was calculated for all 6 questions. A chi-square value was performed to determine if the results are clinically significant based on the clinical scenario.

Results

There was 56 responses to the survey that were included in the analysis. Overall, there was a statistically significant trend towards surgical management of the surgeon’s own diaphyseal humerus fractures (55%) compared to that of healthy patients (41%) and those with medical comorbidities (21%) (p = 0.02) A similar trend was noted for operative management for diaphyseal clavicle fractures by the surgeon on their own fractures (43%) compared to that of healthy patients (38%) and those with medical comorbidities (18%) (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

While there are an increasing number of relative indications for treatment of diaphyseal humerus shaft and clavicle fractures, the results of this survey indicate that fellow-ship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons prefer surgical management of simple humerus and clavicular fractures in young, healthy patients as well as in themselves.

Risk factors for nonunion after traumatic humeral shaft fractures in adults

Introduction

Humeral shaft fractures account for 3% of adult fractures. Optimal management remains a topic of debate given variable union rates reported in the literature after surgery or functional bracing. The primary aim was to compare these 2 cohorts of patients and their primary fracture union rates. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of nonunion.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 164 adult patients with traumatic humeral shaft fractures was performed. Fractures were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification. Primary outcomes included rate nonunion, including symptomatic fractures requiring conversion to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Secondary outcomes included rates of complications and secondary procedures.

Results

Ninety-four (57%) patients were treated initially with ORIF. Nonoperative patients were older (47.1 vs. 41.5 years, P = .028) and had more medical comorbidity (62% vs. 43%, P = .017), low-energy trauma (62% vs. 34%, P < .0001), and isolated injuries (74% vs. 32%, P < .0001). All patients with open fractures (23%) were treated with débridement and ORIF, and surgical patients had more nerve injuries on presentation (36% vs. 9%, P < .0001). The overall rate of primary fracture union was 88%, similar after ORIF and nonoperative management (92% vs. 83%, P = .095). Multivariate analysis found alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR]: 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-11.0, P = .046) and deep infection (OR: 19.9, 95% CI: 2.6-150.5, P = .004) to be significant predictors of nonunion. Chronic liver disease demonstrated a trend toward increased risk of nonunion (OR: 4.1, 95% CI: 0.8-20.9, P = .088). Seventeen operative patients (18%) developed 17 postoperative complications: iatrogenic nerve palsy (5%), deep infection (5%), and implant failure (3%), the most common. Reoperation rate was 10%, primarily for revision ORIF (4%).

Conclusion

Patients managed nonoperatively were more often older patients with isolated fractures and more medical comorbidity. Surgical candidates were younger, more often with higher energy injuries, and were frequently with concomitant injury. Primary union occurred in 88%, with a trend toward a higher rate after ORIF. Patients with chronic liver disease and/or alcohol abuse are at greater risk for nonunion, irrespective of treatment.

Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures: an ACS NSQIP-based comparative analysis over 8 years

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this study was to compare the utilization of plate versus intramedullary nail (IMN) in the treatment of humerus fractures. Secondarily, we sought to examine whether any differences in demographics and clinical course of patients who receive a nail versus plate affect the procedure selection process.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was queried for patients surgically treated for a humeral shaft fracture from the years 2007-2015, using current procedural terminology (CPT) code. Patients with overlapping procedures, nonunion, polytrauma, and malignancy were excluded. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated to compare preoperative comorbidities. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test was used to compare numerical values, whereas the Fisher exact and Chi-squared analyses were performed to compare categorical variables. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Preoperative variables with a p value < 0.05 and a clinical prevalence > 1%, indicating statistical and clinical significance, were included in a logistic regression for multivariate analysis to identify any independent predictors for procedure selection (IMN versus PF) based on preoperative patient characteristics.

RESULTS

During the study period plate fixation increased from 7 cases per year to 272 cases per year, while IMN increased from 8 cases per year to 80 cases per year. IMNs were mostly in older patients (63.85 vs 56.19 years, p < 0.001), and patients with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (4.64 vs 2.79, p < 0.001). IMN was associated with shorter operation times (104 min vs 128 min, p < 0.001) and longer lengths of hospital stay (3.43d vs 2.78d, p < 0.001). No significant differences in overall complication rates were seen between patients who received IMN versus PF. However, the postoperative mortality rate was higher in patients who received IMN compared to PF (2.19% vs 0.40%, p < 0.01). Based on the regression analysis, patient age was the only independent patient factor demonstrated to predict the utilization of IMN over PF in older patients with humeral shaft fractures p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

According to this NSQIP-based analysis, the rate of PF and IMN utilization increased in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures over a period of 8 years, but PF was performed at an overall a higher rate than IMN. Intramedullary nailing was preferred over PF in older patients with more comorbidities. The last possibly contributed to the higher 30-day mortality rate observed in patients who received IMN compared to PF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Retrospective comparative study.

Early outcomes of magnetic intramedullary compression nailing for humeral fractures

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment protocol for humeral shaft fractures at risk for nonunions is controversial. Here, we aim to describe magnetic intramedullary compression nailing as an option for these challenging scenarios and to evaluate its clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective case series was performed at an urban university-based level-1 trauma center. Patients aged 18-65 who underwent fixation of their at-risk humerus shaft fracture using the PRECICE nail were included in this investigation. These fractures are characterized by a persistent distraction gap, minimal callous formation, or malalignment greater than 20 degrees. The study data were collected through a retrospective chart review and review of the radiographic studies. Primary outcome measure was radiographic union. Secondary outcome measures included mechanical failure, nonunion, malunion, medical, and surgical complications. Functional outcome was determined by range of motion and restoration of rotator cuff strength.

RESULTS

A total of six patients were included who underwent treatment of their humeral shaft fracture with a NuVasive PRECICE nail after failure of conservative management. After nail placement along with our compression protocol, all patients achieved bony union and experienced favorable outcomes with return to their previous working status. Two complications included a superficial incisional infection treated with antibiotics and a backing out of proximal screw which did not cause discomfort. No other mechanical failures, surgical complications, or medical complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Early results of controlled compression nailing for humeral shaft fracture demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes. This technique may be utilized for these challenging situations.

TREATMENT OF HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES: ANTEGRADE INTERLOCKING INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING WITH ADDITIONAL INTERLOCKING NEUTRALIZATION SCREWS THROUGH FRACTURE SITE

The aim of this study was to compare union time between two different nail designs for the treatment of humeral shaft fracture, i.e. antegrade interlocking intramedullary nail with and without additional interlocking neutralization screws. The retrospective study included 51 patients treated with antegrade humeral intramedullary nailing between January 2015 and December 2017. The inclusion criteria of the study were proximal and middle third humeral shaft fractures. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria; 23 patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary nail with additional interlocking neutralization screws through fracture site (group A) and 28 patients were treated with antegrade intramedullary nail without additional interlocking neutralization screws (group B). Medical documentation and radiographic images taken preoperatively and postoperatively were reviewed. Radiological union was defined as cortical bridging of at least three of four cortices in two-plane radiographs, with disappearance of the fracture gap. There were no significant differences in union time between the groups (p>0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first report of antegrade interlocking humeral nailing with additional interlocking neutralization screws through fracture site. Hypothetical advantages of fracture gap reduction by additional interlocking neutralization screws to promote union were not confirmed by this first clinical trial.

Lengthening With Monolateral External Fixation Versus Magnetically Motorized Intramedullary Nail in Congenital Femoral Deficiency

BACKGROUND

Limb lengthening for congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) with or without fibular hemimelia can be performed with both external and internal devices. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of femoral lengthening utilizing monolateral external fixation versus a magnetically motorized intramedullary nail in patients with CFD with or without fibular hemimelia.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 62 patients with femoral lengthening, 32 patients had monolateral external fixation (group A), 30 patients had internal lengthening nail (group B). Mean age in years was 9.4±3.8 and 15.4±4.9 for groups A and B, respectively. Mean follow-up in years was 4.47±2.7 and 1.86±0.7 years for groups A and B, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean lengthening achieved was 5.6±1.7 and 4.8±1.4 cm for group A and group B, respectively (P=0.052). Mean distraction index was 0.7±0.2 mm/d for group A and 0.7±0.2 mm/d for the group B (P=0.99). Mean consolidation index for group A was 29.3±12.7 and 34.8±11.2 d/cm for group B (P=0.08). Mean arc of motion before surgery and at final follow-up were similar between groups (P=0.35). Group A had significantly less range of motion at the end of distraction (P=0.0007) and at consolidation (P<0.0001). Both groups had similar rates of obstacles and complications. A significant difference between groups was found in the total problems (P<0.001) specifically with pin site/superficial infection (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The intramedullary nail had superior range of motion during the lengthening phase and at consolidation and an overall lower problem complication rate, while maintaining similar distraction and healing indices to monolateral external fixation. Internal lengthening nails represent a significant advance in technology for CFD lengthening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-therapeutic.

Early post-operative outcomes of plate versus nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to measure early postoperative outcomes of plate vs. nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients ≥18 years who underwent plate or nail fixation for low-energy humeral shaft fractures between 2005-2016 were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Multivariable regression was used to compare postoperative outcomes using propensity score adjustment to account for differences between fixation groups. Variables included in the propensity score were age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, hypertension, steroid use, cancer, functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and sex.

RESULTS

Plate fixation was used in 1418 patients (70.6%), while nail fixation was used in 591 (29.4%). Patients undergoing nail fixation were more likely to be older, have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and have comorbidities. Mean operative time was statistically longer in the plate fixation group (130 +/-62 min vs. 102 +/-54 min). After propensity score adjustment, type of fixation was not a significant predictor of major or minor complications, length of stay, or readmission. However, nail fixation was a significant predictor of mortality following propensity score adjustment (OR 3.15, 95% Confidence interval 1.26-7.85).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing intramedullary nail fixation tended to be older patients with more comorbidities, suggesting that surgeons are selecting nail fixation in patients who may not be ideal surgical candidates. Although LOS, complications, and readmission rates were higher in the nail group, this difference was not statistically significant following propensity score adjustment. However, nail fixation remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality following adjustment. This suggests that nail fixation may not be a safer surgical option in patients with multiple medical co-morbidities and low-energy humeral shaft fractures.

Treatment of humerus fractures in the elderly: A systematic review covering effectiveness, safety, economic aspects and evolution of practice

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this Health Technology Assessment was to evaluate effectiveness, complications and cost-effectiveness of surgical or non-surgical treatment for proximal, diaphyseal or distal fractures of the humerus in elderly patients. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the intervention costs per treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) and to investigate treatment traditions of PHF in Sweden.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The assessment contains a systematic review of clinical and health economic studies comparing treatment options for humerus fractures in elderly patients. The results regarding the effectiveness of treatments are summarized in meta-analyses. The assessment also includes a cost analysis for treatment options and an analysis of registry data of PHF. For hemiarthroplasty (HA) and non-operative treatment, there was no clinically important difference for moderately displaced PHF at one-year follow-up regarding patient rated outcomes, (standardized mean difference [SMD]) -0.17 (95% CI: -0.56; 0.23). The intervention cost for HA was at least USD 5500 higher than non-surgical treatment. The trend in Sweden is that surgical treatment of PHF is increasing. When functional outcome of percutaneous fixation/plate fixation/prosthesis surgery and non-surgical treatment was compared for PHF there were no clinically relevant differences, SMD -0.05 (95% CI: -0.26; 0.15). There was not enough data for interpretation of quality of life or complications. Evidence was scarce regarding comparisons of different surgical options for humerus fracture treatment. The cost of plate fixation of a PHF was at least USD 3900 higher than non-surgical treatment, costs for complications excluded. In Sweden the incidence of plate fixation of PHF increased between 2005 and 2011.

CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate/low certainty of evidence that surgical treatment of moderately displaced PHF in elderly patients has not been proven to be superior to less costly non-surgical treatment options. Further research of humerus fractures is likely to have an important impact.

The Resolution Axis Method (RAM) for lengthening of the femur with or without associated frontal plane deformity (a new method)

INTRODUCTION

Femoral lengthening with or along intramedullary (IM) nails will occur along the axis of the nail coincident with the anatomical axis of the bone. In the femur particularly, such lengthening often creates lateral mechanical axis deviation as the knee is driven medially. In cases where shortening is associated with frontal plane deformity the surgeon needs to correct the deformity intra-operatively, however, subsequent lengthening along the anatomical axis will create deformity. Thus, planning for lengthening of the femur with or along IM nails, whether shortening is associated with frontal plane deformity or not, requires a completely different planning strategy. The author questioned if a resolution anatomical axis can be identified and used for planning when lengthening the femur along or with IM nails while still applying the same classic CORA deformity analysis method.

METHODS

In a prospective study, the author included eight patients who needed femoral lengthening, five with associated frontal plane deformity and three without. The author identified a method to determine the trajectory of the nail in the lower femoral segment. It was done by calculating the angle enclosed between this resolution anatomical axis and the mechanical axis, also known as the anatomical-mechanical angle.

RESULTS

This new method has proven to be effective in achieving normal alignment after lengthening is completed.

CONCLUSION

The Resolution Axis Method is a new and alternative method providing a solution for planning when lengthening the femur along the anatomical axis using an IM nail, whether a deformity is present or not.

Evaluation of the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures and comparison between surgical fixation methods

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to analyze the surgical results of humeral shaft fracture treatment and describe its epidemiology.

METHODS

Retrospective study that identified all patients treated with surgical fixation of humeral shaft fractures between December of 2014 and June of 2016 in a trauma reference center. All medical records were reviewed in search of epidemiological data referent to the trauma and post-operative results, including radiographic healing of the fracture and related complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included, mostly male (78.4%), with an average age of 35.02 years. The most common trauma mechanism was a traffic accident (56.9%) followed by same-level falls (17.6%). No statistically significant difference was found between healing time comparing surgical fixation techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, minimally invasive technique, intramedullary nailing, and external fixation.

CONCLUSION

Although each technique has inherent advantages and disadvantages, all fixation methods proved to be adequate options for the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with high rates of healing and low rates of post-operative complications.

Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures versus conservative treatment with a functional brace: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial embedded in a cohort

INTRODUCTION

Humeral shaft fractures represent 1%-3% of all fractures and 20% of humeral fractures in adults. The treatment of these fractures is mainly conservative and operative treatment is usually reserved for specific circumstances. To date, no randomised controlled trial (RCT) has compared operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with conservative treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct an RCT to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. After providing informed consent, 80 patients from 18 years of age with humeral shaft fracture will be randomly assigned to open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate or conservative treatment with functional bracing. We will follow the patients for 10 years and compare the results at different time points. The primary outcome will be Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) at 12 months. The secondary outcomes will include Numerical Rating Scale for pain at rest and in activities, Constant Score and quality of life instrument 15D. Patients not willing to participate in the RCT will be asked to participate in a prospective cohort follow-up study, 'the declined cohort'. This cohort will be followed up at the same time points as the randomised patients to assess the potential effect of participation bias on RCT results and to enhance the external validity of the RCT. In one of the recruiting centres, all cooperative patients with humeral shaft fractures not eligible for randomisation will be asked to participate in a 'non-eligible cohort' study. We will use blinded data interpretation of the randomised cohort to avoid biased interpretation of outcomes. Our null hypothesis is that there is no clinically relevant difference in the primary outcome measure between the two treatment groups. We will consider a difference of a minimum of 10 points in DASH clinically relevant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District has approved the protocol. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01719887; pre-results.

Do Cerclage Cables Delay the Time to Bone Union in Patients with an Unstable Humeral Shaft Fracture Treated with Intramedullary Nails?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the time to bone union after open reduction and internal fixation with cerclage cables followed by intramedullary nailing (IMN) for unstable humeral shaft fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a humeral shaft fracture treated by IMN were enrolled. One group of patients was treated via open reduction and internal fixation with cables followed by IMN (cable group; n=32), while the other group was treated with a conventional closed IMN (non-cable group; n=64). The length of time to bone union and functional scores [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores] were measured for all patients.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in terms of age, gender, injury type, or smoking history between the two groups, except for the type of fracture. The cable group had significantly more complex types of fracture than the non-cable group (p<0.001). The mean time to bone union was 3.9 months in the cable group, while in the non-cable group, it was 4.4 months (p=0.041). The incidence of postoperative complications, such as non-union, delayed union, and radial nerve palsy, was similar between the two groups (p>0.05). No differences were identified in terms of DASH and UCLA scores (28.8 and 32.1 in the cable group and 26.4 and 32.6 in the non-cable group, respectively; p=0.335 and 0.264).

CONCLUSION

In unstable humeral shaft fractures treated by IMN, open reduction and internal fixation with additional cerclage cables do not delay the length of time to bone union or increase the rate of other complications.

Surgical interventions to treat humerus shaft fractures: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There are three main surgical techniques to treat humeral shaft fractures: open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF), intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, and minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). We performed a network meta-analysis to compare three surgical procedures, including ORPF, IMN fixation, and MIPO, to provide the optimum treatment for humerus shaft fractures.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, and Cochrane library were researched for reports published up to May 2016. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more of the three surgical procedures, including the ORPF, IMN, and MIPO techniques, for humeral shaft fractures in adults. The methodological quality was evaluated based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used WinBUGS1.4 to conduct this Bayesian network meta-analysis. We used the odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to calculate the dichotomous outcomes and analyzed the percentages of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible publications reporting 16 RCTs were included in this study. Eight hundred and thirty-two participants were randomized to receive one of three surgical procedures. The results showed that shoulder impingement occurred more commonly in the IMN group than with either ORPF (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.37) or MIPO fixation (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-0.69). Iatrogenic radial nerve injury occurred more commonly in the ORPF group than in the MIPO group (OR, 11.09; 95% CI, 1.80-124.20). There were no significant differences among the three procedures in nonunion, delayed union, and infection.

CONCLUSION

Compared with IMN and ORPF, MIPO technique is the preferred treatment method for humeral shaft fractures.

Tibial Lengthening Using a Fixator-Assisted Lengthening Plate: A New Technique

Background

There are many techniques that are used for limb lengthening. Lengthening a limb over a plate is an alternative choice used in children or when using an intramedullary nail is difficult.

Objectives

In this study, we presented a new technique for tibial lengthening using a monolateral external fixator over a lengthening plate.

Materials and Methods

For tibial lengthening, a monolateral external fixator was attached to the composite bone model medially. After a corticotomy was performed, the lengthening plate was placed laterally. Three locking screws were inserted proximally, and two cortical screws were inserted into a lengthening hole that was 1 cm below the osteotomy site. We avoided contact between the screws of the lengthening plate and the pins of the external fixator. During bone lengthening with the monolateral external fixator, the screws at the lengthening hole were able to slide distally with the distal segment of the tibia to allow for tibial elongation. Two locking screws were fixed at the distal locking holes of the plate when the bone elongation was complete. The external fixator was then removed.

Results

The fixator-assisted lengthening plate allowed bone lengthening without malalignment. There were no mechanical problems associated with the external fixator during the lengthening process. Plate osteosynthesis was stable after the fixator was removed. There was no contact between the screws of plate and the Schanz pins of the external fixator under C-arm fluoroscopy.

Conclusions

The fixator-assisted lengthening plate technique helps to maintain the stability and alignment at both sides of an osteotomy during tibial elongation. It allows the early removal of the external fixator immediately after lengthening is completed. This technique can be applied in children with open physes and in patients with a narrow medullary canal who are unsuitable for limb lengthening over an intramedullary nail.

Rotator Cuff-Sparing Approach for Antegrade Humeral Nailing With Biceps Tenodesis: A Technical Trick With Clinical Implications

Antegrade intramedullary nails are an established, effective method of fixation for humeral shaft fractures. One significant limitation of this technique is chronic postoperative shoulder pain, which is likely related to the standard approach that involves splitting the rotator cuff to gain access to the nail starting point. Furthermore, mounting evidence suggests that both the intra-articular portion of the biceps tendon and the extra-articular portion in the bicipital groove can scar down after trauma, causing pain and limiting shoulder range of motion. We describe an approach through the rotator interval with tenodesis of the biceps tendon and resection of the intra-articular portion. Using a rotator cuff interval instead of a rotator cuff insertion approach allows access to the optimal humeral nail starting point while avoiding damage to intra-articular structures of the shoulder, potentially decreasing sources of postoperative shoulder pain.

Use of a magnetic bone nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia

PURPOSE

To report our experience with the PRECICE nail for limb lengthening in 23 patients.

METHODS

Records of 15 female and 8 male patients aged 14 to 38 (mean, 23.6) years who underwent lengthening of the tibia (n=6) or femur (n=21) using the PRECICE nail were reviewed. The reasons for lengthening included trauma (n=7), hemihypertrophy (n=2), focal femoral deficiency (n=2), Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (n=1), hip septic arthritis sequelae (n=1), hereditary multiple exostosis (n=1), club foot sequela (n=1), congenital tibial pseudoarthrosis (n=1), fibrous dysplasia (n=1), idiopathic limb length discrepancy (n=7), and cosmetic (n=1).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 20.72 months. The mean lengthening was 48.20 mm, and the mean acute angular correction was 15.5º. The mean time to full weight-bearing was 5.15 months, and the mean consolidation index was 1.12 months/cm. The mean maturation index was 0.78 months/cm. One patient had nail breakage during the consolidation phase. The nail was replaced by an intramedullary nail until consolidation, after which another PRECICE nail was used to treat the residual shortening. Eight patients had over-lengthening and the nails were driven back to the desired length. No patient had infection.

CONCLUSION

The PRECICE nail is a viable option for lengthening of the femur and tibia.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of three different surgical procedures for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical procedure for humeral shaft fractures remains a matter of debate. We aimed to establish the optimum procedure by performing a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched for both randomized controlled trials and prospective studies of surgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures. The quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's "Risk of bias".

RESULTS

Seventeen RCTs or prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that the occurrence rate of radial nerve injury was lowest for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO; SUCRA probability, 95.1%), followed by open reduction and plate osteosynthesis (ORPO; SUCRA probability, 29.5%), and was highest for intramedullary nailing (IMN; SUCRA probability, 25.4%). The aggregated results of pairwise meta-analysis showed no significant difference in radial nerve injury rate when comparing ORPO versus IMN (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.96 to 3.86), ORPO versus MIPO (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 0.80 to 14.31), or IMN versus MIPO (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 0.48 to 21.28). Regarding the nonunion, SUCRA probabilities were 90.5%, 40.2%, and 19.3% for MIPO, ORPO, and IMN, respectively. The aggregated results of a pairwise meta-analysis also showed no significant difference for ORPO versus IMN (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.69), ORPO versus MIPO (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 0.45 to 12.95), or IMN versus MIPO (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.35 to 17.64).

CONCLUSION

The current evidence indicates that MIPO is the optimum choice in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures and that ORPO is superior to IMN.

Case-Match Controlled Comparison of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Intramedullary Nailing for the Stabilization of Humeral Shaft Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risk of major complications after either minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) or intramedullary nailing (IMN) of humeral shaft fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case-match controlled study.

SETTING

A major metropolitan tertiary referral trauma center in Australia.

PATIENTS

Thirty patients with fractures of the humeral shaft.

INTERVENTION

Either MIPO or IMN were performed on 15 patients each with traumatic humeral shaft fractures.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

The cumulative risk of 3 major complications associated with these procedures: nonunion, infection, and iatrogenic radial nerve injury.

RESULTS

An overall major complication rate of 53% was observed in the patients treated with IMN; one complication (7%) was identified in those managed with humeral MIPO, a nonunion. Complications after IMN included 4 patients (27%) with nonunion, 3 patients (20%) with iatrogenic radial nerve injuries, and 1 patient (7%) with a wound infection. Statistical analysis revealed a significant between-group difference (P = 0.01) in the cumulative rate of major complications. When each of these complications was considered independently, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that humeral MIPO results in a significantly lower pooled major complication rate than that of IMN, and it should therefore be considered an attractive alternative to IMN in those patients requiring surgical stabilization of a traumatic humeral shaft fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fixator-assisted tibial lengthening over a plate in a patient with sequelae of poliomyelitis

There are many techniques for limb lengthening. Lengthening over a plate is an alternative choice of fixation in children or when nailing is difficult. We present a new technique for tibial lengthening with using a monolateral external fixator over a lengthening plate.Lengthening over an intramedullary nail is a commonly used method in patients with short stature or limb-length discrepancy. However, in patients with a narrow and excessively sclerotic intramedullary cavity in the pediatric age group where the skeletal system has not yet fully developed, difficulties have been observed in lengthening methods with nailing.Therefore, in these cases, the use of lengthening techniques over a plate is an alternative treatment option. Nevertheless, in lengthening techniques over a plate, if one side of the osteotomy area cannot be fixed, associated mechanical axis problems have been reported.We applied tibia lengthening with external fixator assistance over a custom-made lengthening plate in a patient with sequelae of poliomyelitis. This new lengthening technique applied over a plate could be the solution to the problems observed in other lengthening techniques over a plate.

Lengthening Over an Existing Intramedullary Nail In Cases of Post-traumatic Femoral Shortening. Technical Note. Case Series Study

Background:

Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the method of choice for the treatment of most femoral shaft fractures. However, despite successful solid union, great initial fracture comminution can lead to significant leg length discrepancy affecting normal gait mechanics. Femoral osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis over the pre-existing IM nail could restore this limb inequality.

Methods:

Five patients with an average post-traumatic femoral shortening of 3.83 cm were presented in our department with the nail in situ. Limb lengthening was achieved with the application of a distal hybrid external rail frame over the pre-existing nail. We assumed that the choice of a distal external fixator ring with wires could facilitate the procedure and minimize the possibility of friction–contact problems with the large diameter nail.

Results:

The amount of length discrepancy, calculated preoperatively, was restored in all patients. The mean time in frame was 57.6 days and the external fixator index 16.978 d/cm. The mean time of total healing was 152.6 days and the average bone-healing index 44.9d/cm. No deep infection or hardware loosening was observed. One superficial pin track infection was treated successfully with oral antibiotics.

Conclusion:

This technique utilizes the principles and advantages of lengthening over an IM nail, avoids the necessity of nail removal and minimizes the complication rates and the overall time for complete recovery.

Femoral lengthening and deformity correction using the Fitbone motorized lengthening nail

BACKGROUND

This study reports our results with retrograde Fitbone insertion in patients with femoral shortening and deformity. We also present our experience regarding the benefits, complications, and factors associated with complications of the Fitbone technique.

METHODS

Twelve males and ten females had femoral shortening and deformities treated using the retrograde Fitbone technique between 2009 and 2012. The etiologies were post-traumatic in 12 patients, poliomyelitis in four, cosmetic in two, congenital hypoplasia in two, achondroplasia in one, and Perthes sequela in one.

RESULTS

The follow-up time was 30.8 months. The mean lengthening was 5.8 (range 2-14) cm. The degree of acute angular correction was 9° (5-22°) in nine cases. The time to full weight-bearing was 5.9 months. The consolidation index was 1.07 (0.75-1.62) months/cm. Complete consolidation was obtained in all cases except two. Running back was observed in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The Fitbone technique allows accurate deformity correction. The rigid reamers allow the surgeon to use the Fitbone even in patients with a narrow medullary canal. As this might result in poor bone regeneration, thinner lengthening nails should be considered.

Comparison of lateral and posterior surgical approach in management of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare treatment results and complication rates between lateral and posterior approaches in surgical treatment of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between June 2008 and May 2012, a total of 68 patients with extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures were treated by lateral and posterior approaches. Of the patients, 30 were operated by a lateral approach (group I) and 26 patients were operated by a posterior approach (group II). There was no statistical significance between the two groups in sex distribution, age, the mechanism of the injury, injured arms, AO/ASIF (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation) classification, and the time from injury to surgery (P>0.05). Operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, hospitalisation, clinical outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. The elbow functional results were evaluated by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

RESULTS

All patients were followed up. The average of follow-up in group I was 15.53±2.636 months (range, 12-22 months), and was 16.12±2.889 months (range, 12-22 months) in group II. There was no significant difference in the operation time, intraoperative bleeding time, and hospitalisation between the two groups (P>0.05). In group I, the mean time of bone union was 12.87±1.852 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks), the mean degrees of elbow flexion was 139.20°±3.274° (range, 134-146°), the mean degrees of elbow extension was 4.77°±1.906° (range, 0-8°), and the mean points of MEPS was 87.00±7.724 (range, 70-100 points). In group II, the mean time of bone union was 12.96±2.218 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks), the mean degrees of elbow flexion was 137.85°±4.076° (range, 130-145°), the mean degrees of elbow extension was 5.15°±2.327° (range, 0-9°), and the mean points of MEPS was 86.15±7.656 (range, 70-100 points). There was no significant difference in the bone union, range of elbow flexion, range of elbow extension and MEPS between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall complication rate in group I was lower than that in group II (P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Both lateral and posterior surgical approaches acquired satisfied treatment results in the management of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures, and there was a lower complication rate using the lateral approach.