Short, locked humeral nailing via Neviaser portal: an anatomic study

Reconstruction of the Superior Capsule Using Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft Combined With Transposition of Biceps Tendon for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Traditional superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with biceps tendon transposition (TB) alone for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs) has demonstrated a high retear rate, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. Therefore, SCR using a peroneus longus tendon graft (PLG) combined with TB (PLG-TB) should be clinically studied.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR using the PLG-TB technique versus the TB technique alone for IMRCT.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Between February 2017 and March 2022, 94 patients were diagnosed with IMRCT; 45 patients underwent SCR using the TB technique (group 1), and 49 patients underwent SCR using the PLG-TB technique (group 2). The choice of technique was based on tendon damage severity and patient preference. After a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, postoperative clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); Constant; and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores as well as the shoulder range of motion. The integrity of tendons, acromiohumeral distance, and retear was evaluated through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up times were 35.2 ± 4.2 months for group 1 and 34.1 ± 3.2 months for group 2. There was a significant improvement observed in all clinical outcomes in both groups from the baseline preoperative evaluations to the final follow-up assessments (P = .001 for ASES score, UCLA score, Constant score, VAS score, forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation). Shoulder abduction in group 2 showed statistically significant mean improvements at the postoperative 3-month, 6-month, and final follow-ups compared with group 1 (3 months: 105.17°± 7.13° vs 89.34°± 7.34° [P = .001]; 6 months: 138.14°± 9.12° vs 107.35°± 8.54° [P = .001]; final follow-up: 157.35°± 8.11° vs 135.31°± 7.01° [P = .001]). The tendon integrity at the final follow-up (Sugaya MRI grades 1/2/3/4/5) was significantly better in group 2 (30/6/6/4/3) compared with group 1 (11/13/5/6/10) (P = .014). Additionally, the tendon retear rate was lower in group 2 (7/49; 14.29%) than in group 1 (16/45, 35.56%) (P = .015).

CONCLUSION

Both surgical techniques led to acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with IMRCT. However, using the PLG-TB technique for SCR was associated with lower retear rates and enhanced abduction function outcomes compared with the TB technique for SCR.

Intramedullary versus locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: indications and technical considerations

Background

The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) continues to increase with an aging population, and intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locking plate fixation are two commonly employed techniques for the surgical management of PHF. However, the optimal fixation method can be a source of ongoing controversy. Some influencing factors include the extent of humeral head involvement, fracture complexity, patient age, and surgeon preference. There are many studies that provide a mix of data either when comparing the two techniques or analyzing them in isolation. The aim of this review is to further elucidate the indications and technical considerations involved specifically in IMN vs. locking plate fixation for PHF to further aid orthopedic surgeons when choosing surgical management.

Methods

A narrative approach was chosen for this review allowing for a comprehensive review of literature, including recent findings pertaining to the comparison of management options for PHF. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria involved studies that discussed "proximal humerus fracture" and either "intramedullary nail" or "locking plate fixation."

Results

Complications such as avascular necrosis, hardware failure, additional surgical interventions, infection, fracture redisplacement, rotator cuff rupture, and nonunion did not show significant differences between the two groups. Newer generation humeral nails have minimized early complications. As both techniques undergo further refinement and utilization when specifically indicated, functional outcomes, potential complications, and postoperative pain continue to be improved.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests that both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, with unclear superiority of either method. The choice of technique should be tailored to patient factors such as fracture type, age, bone quality, and functional expectations. Surgeon experience also plays a role. While certain presentations may exhibit trends that favor one fixation, no specific technique can be universally recommended. Both IMN and LP have shown comparable and satisfactory outcomes, and the final fixation method chosen should take into account the unique characteristics of each patient.

Intramedullary nailing vs. open reduction-internal fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare outcomes following intramedullary nailing (IMN) vs. open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) for humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. RCTs comparing IMN and ORIF for humeral shaft fractures were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using RevMan. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with 512 patients were included. Overall, 8.4% of patients treated with IMN and 6.4% of patients treated with ORIF had nonunion (P = .57, I2 = 0%), with a significantly faster time to union with IMN (10 weeks vs. 11.9 weeks, P < .05). There was no significant difference in the rate of reoperation (11.6% in IMN group vs. 7.6% in ORIF group, P = .26) or radial nerve palsy (2.8% in IMN group vs. 4.2% in ORIF group, P = .58). A lower rate of infection was noted with IMN (1.2% vs. 5.3%, P < .05). Additionally, there was a lower operative time with IMN (61 minutes vs. 88 minutes, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Level I evidence in the literature does not show a significant difference in rates of union, reoperation, or radial nerve palsy between IMN and ORIF for humeral shaft fractures. Overall, treatment with IMN results in a lower infection rate, less operative time, and a modestly quicker time to union. The optimal treatment strategy for humeral shaft fractures may be best informed by fracture pattern and surgeon preference.

Humeral intramedullary nail placement through the rotator interval: an anatomic and radiographic analysis

BACKGROUND

Antegrade humeral intramedullary nails are an effective fixation method for certain proximal humeral fractures and humeral shaft fractures. However, owing to potential rotator cuff damage during nail insertion, shoulder pain remains a common postoperative complaint. The purpose of this study was to provide quantitative data characterizing the anatomic and radiographic location of the rotator interval (RI) for an antegrade humeral intramedullary nail using a mini-deltopectoral approach.

METHODS

Six consecutive fresh-frozen intact cadaveric specimens (mean age, 69 ± 12.8 years) were obtained for our study. Demographic data were collected on each specimen. A mini-deltopectoral approach was used, followed by placement of a guidewire in the RI. Quantitative anatomic relationships were calculated using a fractional carbon fiber digital caliper. Radiographic measurements were performed by 2 orthopedic residents and 1 practicing fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon. In addition to re-measurement of similar anatomic relationships on radiographs, the ratio of the distance from the lateral humeral edge to the starting point relative to the width of the humeral head on the anteroposterior (AP) view was calculated. Similarly, on the lateral view, the ratio of the distance from the anterior humeral edge to the starting point relative to the humeral head width was calculated.

RESULTS

In all cases, the described approach allowed for preservation of the biceps tendon and access to the RI for guidewire insertion, with no subsequent rotator cuff or humeral articular cartilage damage identified following nail insertion. The ratio of the distance from the lateral humeral edge to the starting point relative to the humeral head width on the AP view was 0.4 ± 0.0. The ratio of the distance from the anterior humeral edge to the starting point relative to the humeral head width on the lateral view was 0.3 ± 0.0.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of a mini-deltopectoral approach and shows that the ideal starting point through the RI radiographically lies along the medial aspect of the lateral third of the humeral head on the AP view and along the posterior aspect of the anterior third of the humeral head on the lateral view.

Arthroscopic intramedullary nailing of humeral fractures through the rotator interval

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade nailing of humeral fractures is a proven technique with well-documented results. The standard surgical approach requires incision of the supraspinatus tendon to insert a nail, which comes with the risk of damaging the rotator cuff. The aims of this study were to describe a new surgical technique for arthroscopic humeral nailing that does not require opening the rotator cuff and to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of patients who had a humeral shaft or surgical neck fracture at our hospital in 2017 and underwent antegrade intramedullary nailing by arthroscopy. The nail was introduced through the rotator interval without opening the rotator cuff. All were reviewed at 1-year postoperative: clinical examination (joint range of motion and Constant score) plus AP and lateral radiographs of the shoulder.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (12 women, 6 men) with a mean age of 65.4 years (37-84) were included retrospectively. One patient died during the follow-up period thus 17 patients were available for analysis. At the 1-year follow-up, the mean forward flexion was 152.1° (90-180), the mean external rotation was 56.1° (30-80), the mean absolute Constant score was 73.9 (54-88) points and the mean adjusted Constant score was 93.5 (67-100) points. Bone union was achieved in 16/17 patients (94%) with 1 patient experiencing a nonunion. There were no complications.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic antegrade nailing of humeral shaft and surgical neck fractures through the rotator interval yields good clinical and radiological results in our hands. This new, rotator cuff-sparing technique is a viable option for treating humeral fractures by arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study without control group.

The portal of Neviaser: a valid option for antegrade nailing of humerus fractures

Introduction

The objective of this retrospective non-randomized study was to evaluate the portal of Neviaser (PN) as an alternative approach in antegrade humeral nailing.

Methods

The surgical approach for the straight antegrade intramedullary nail (SAIN) was either the anterolateral delta-split (group 2, n = 79) or the portal of Neviaser (group 3, n = 27). Length of surgery and time of radiation were extracted from charts. Patients stabilized using the PN were followed for a clinical and radiological exam. At follow-up we evaluated the DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and CMS (Constant-Murley Score).

Results

Between 10.2015 and 12.2018 191 proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures were operated using either an angular stable extramedullary device (group 1, PHILOS®, n = 85) or a straight humeral nail (MultiLoc®, n = 106). Time of radiation and intervention followed a normal distribution. The mean length of surgery was 172.9 min (SD 91.5) in group 1, 121.5 min (SD 54.1) in group 2 and 96.4 min (SD 33.7) in group 3 (p < 0.01). Time of radiation was significantly different with 1.1 min (SD 0.6: group 1), 3.1 min (SD 1.6: group 2) and 2.9 min (SD 1.7: group 3) (p < 0.01). After a mean interval of 21.5 months (range 6–43 months) 14 / 27 patients of group 3 were available for a clinical and radiological follow-up. The mean DASH in group 3 was 25, the CMS reached 70. The age and sex weighted CMS mean value was 96%. Forward flexion was 131°, abduction 125°. The ratio of strength affected versus non-affected side was 4.4: 6.2 kg.

Conclusions

The portal of Neviaser is a feasible and safe approach and is an alternative to the anterolateral delta-split. Length of surgery and time of radiation were significantly shorter.

Level of evidence

IV

Rotator cuff integrity and shoulder function after intra-medullary humerus nailing

INTRODUCTION

Antegrade percutaneous intra-medullary nailing (IMN) has a poor reputation in the treatment of humerus fractures. The aim of the present study was to assess rotator cuff integrity and shoulder function after IMN in humerus fracture.

HYPOTHESIS

Third-generation humeral nails (straight, small diameter, with locked screws) conserve rotator cuff tendon integrity and avoid the shoulder stiffness and pain incurred by 1st generation (large diameter, without self-blocking screw) and 2nd generation nails (curved, penetrating the supraspinatus insertion on the greater tuberosity).

METHODS

Forty patients (26 female, 14 male; mean age, 60 years (range, 20-89 years)) with displaced humeral fracture (23 proximal humerus, 17 humeral shaft) underwent IMN using a 3rd generation nail (34 Aequalis™ (Tornier-Wright), 6 MultiLoc™ (Depuy-Synthes)). Mean clinical, radiologic and ultrasound follow-up was 8 months (range, 6-18 months); 22 patients agreed to postoperative CT scan.

RESULTS

There were no revision surgeries for rotator cuff repair or secondary bone displacement. Mean Adjusted Constant Score (ACS) was 93±22% and the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) 77±18%. Elevation was 140±36°, external rotation 48±22° and internal rotation was to L3. Ultrasound found: 5 supraspinatus tendon lesions (12.5%) (2 full and 3 deep partial tears) without functional impact (ACS) 91% without vs. 107% with tear; (p=0.12); 2 of the deep partial tears involved excessively lateral and high nail positioning. Eight patients (20%) had painful tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon associated with significantly impaired functional scores (ACS 65% vs. 100%; p<0.001); and 4 cases of technical error: 3 of anterior LHB screwing in the groove, and 1 of LHB irritation due to an excessively long posterior screw.

CONCLUSION

Supraspinatus tendon lesions following IMN with a 3^rd-generation humeral nail were rare (12.5%) and asymptomatic; prevalence was not higher than in the general population in the literature (16%). LHB tendinopathy was frequent (20%) and symptomatic, and due to technical error in half of the cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Displaced humeral surgical neck fractures: classification and results of third-generation percutaneous intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

The high rates of complications and reoperations observed with the early designs of first-generation (unlocked) and second-generation (bent design) humeral intramedullary nail (IMNs) have discouraged their use by most surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a third-generation (straight, locking, low-profile, tuberosity-based fixation) IMN, inserted through a percutaneous approach, for the treatment of displaced 2-part surgical neck fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent placement of a third-generation IMN to treat a displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture (AO/OTA type 11A3). The mean age at surgery was 57 years (range, 17-84 years). After percutaneous insertion through the humeral head, the IMN was used as a reduction tool. Static locking fixation was achieved after axial fracture compression ("back-slap" hammering technique). Patients were reviewed and underwent radiography with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 12-53 months).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 3 types of surgical neck fractures were observed: with valgus head deformity (Type A = 8 cases), shaft translation without head deformity (Type B = 19 cases), or with varus head deformity (Type C = 14 cases). At final follow-up, all fractures went on to union, and the mean humeral neck-shaft angle was 132° ± 5°. We observed 2 malunions and 1 case of partial humeral head avascular necrosis. No cases underwent screw migration or intra-articular penetration. At last review, mean active forward elevation was 146° (range, 90°-180°) and mean external rotation was 50° (range, 20°-80°). The mean Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value were 71 (range, 43-95) and 80% (range, 50%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade insertion of a third-generation IMN through a percutaneous approach provides a high rate of fracture healing, excellent clinical outcome scores, and a low rate of complications. No morbidity related to the passage of the nail through the supraspinatus muscle and the cartilage was observed. The proposed A, B, and C classification allows choosing the optimal entry point for intramedullary nailing.

Evaluation of intramedullary nail fixation via the Neviaser portal for proximal humerus fracture

OBJECTIVES

To our knowledge, no cases have been reported so far regarding the treatment of proximal humerus fracture with intramedullary nail fixation via the Neviaser portal. This study aimed at evaluating the results of intramedullary nail fixation via the Neviaser portal for proximal humerus fracture.

METHODS

Four patients with 2-part proximal humerus fracture, who underwent the intramedullary nail fixation via the Neviaser portal, were included in this study. All the patients were females, and the mean age was 78.8 years. We evaluated their clinical and radiographic findings retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 12 months. All the patients achieved a bone-union without severe complications, such as deep wound infections or any neurological deficits. At the final follow-up, mean shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation were 123.5°, 118°, and 36°, respectively. Mean visual analog pain scale (VAS) score at the final follow-up was 21/100. Complications related to the implants were observed in two patients. In one patient, protrusion of the proximal tip of the nail occurred from the entry point, and this caused secondary subacromial impingement. In the other patient, insertion of the end-cap from the Neviaser portal was not possible, and this resulted in the failure of fixation postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The Neviaser portal may be suitable for the insertion of an intramedullary nail, because it facilitates to make an entry-point at the top of the humeral head. However, the problems related to the use of the present instruments still remain and need to be improved.

Initial Experience With Percutaneous IM Rodding of the Humeri in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta

BACKGROUND

To report a single-center surgical experience treating humeral deformity and fractures in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) using the Fassier-Duval (FD) intramedullary elongating rods.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted between December 2005 and July 2013 of all OI patients who underwent FD rodding with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. All patients were also being concurrently treated with bisphosphonates.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent internal fixation on a total of 35 humeri: 7 males and 11 females with an average age of 49 months. Thirty-five procedures were performed using FD rodding, with 5 utilizing only the male portion. Thirty procedures were primary FD implantation and 5 were revisions. Twelve patients had type III OI and 6 patients type IV OI. Indications for surgery included recurrent fracture, severe bowing deformity, and pain. Osteotomy methods included closed osteoclasis, percutaneous, or open osteotomies. Two patients required transfusions during their hospital stay. At our determined endpoint, 23 humeri (65.7%) had acceptable results with a mean follow-up time of 43 months (SD=27) with no revision. The remaining 12 humeri (34.3%) necessitated revision with a mean time to revision of 35 months (SD=29). Reasons for revision included: migration resulting in pain and functional difficulty (8.6%), migration with bowing (8.6%), and hardware failure secondary to trauma (8.6%). In addition, 2 revisions were required for nonunion (5.7%) and 1 for malunion (2.9%). To our knowledge, all other osteotomies performed during surgery resulted in bony union.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the FD system for correction of humeral deformity demonstrates a reasonable option to improve comfort and function in children with recurrent fractures and deformity secondary to OI. The FD system allows for decreased revision rates and less morbid instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective case series.

Insertion-related pain with intramedullary nailing

The use of intramedullary nails for the treatment of long bone fractures has become increasingly frequent over the last decade with gradually expanding indications and technological advances. Improved biomechanics relative to plates and less direct fracture exposure are some of the potential benefits of intramedullary nails. However, persistent insertion-related pain is common and may limit satisfactory long term outcomes. The etiologies of this phenomenon remain unclear. Proposed theories for which there is a growing body of supporting evidence include hardware prominence, suboptimal nail entry points leading to soft tissue irritation and structural compromise, local heterotrophic ossification, implant instability with persistent fracture micromotion, and poorly defined insertional strain. Many factors that lead to insertion-related pain are iatrogenic, and careful attention to detail and refined surgical techniques will optimize outcomes.

Rotator Cuff-Sparing Approach for Antegrade Humeral Nailing With Biceps Tenodesis: A Technical Trick With Clinical Implications

Antegrade intramedullary nails are an established, effective method of fixation for humeral shaft fractures. One significant limitation of this technique is chronic postoperative shoulder pain, which is likely related to the standard approach that involves splitting the rotator cuff to gain access to the nail starting point. Furthermore, mounting evidence suggests that both the intra-articular portion of the biceps tendon and the extra-articular portion in the bicipital groove can scar down after trauma, causing pain and limiting shoulder range of motion. We describe an approach through the rotator interval with tenodesis of the biceps tendon and resection of the intra-articular portion. Using a rotator cuff interval instead of a rotator cuff insertion approach allows access to the optimal humeral nail starting point while avoiding damage to intra-articular structures of the shoulder, potentially decreasing sources of postoperative shoulder pain.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors depending on implant design in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

We aimed to examine the clinical outcomes of proximal humeral fractures treated with different intramedullary nail shapes.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients were divided into two groups depending on the implant shape. We also defined F group as a subgroup of fracture classification.

RESULTS

In the F group, the flexion of the shoulder joint was significantly greater in S (mean, 134.6°) than in C groups (mean, 109°) (p = 0.04). The complication rate was significantly larger in the C group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with one kind of fracture and who were treated with straight nails had better outcomes.

Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: evolution, technique, and results

Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture in the elderly. Although most fractures can be treated conservatively with acceptable outcomes, certain fracture patterns are at high risk for progression to humeral malunions, nonunions, stiffness, and post-traumatic arthrosis. The goal of antegrade humeral nailing of proximal humerus fractures is to provide stability to a reduced fracture that allows early motion to optimize patient outcomes. Certain technical pearls are pivotal in managing these difficult fractures with nails; these include rotator cuff management, respect of the soft tissues, anatomic tuberosity position, blood supply maintenance, knowledge of the deforming forces on the proximal humerus, fracture reduction, and rehabilitation strategies. Modern proximal humeral nail designs and techniques assist the surgeon in adhering to these principles and have demonstrated promising outcomes. Humeral nail designs have undergone significant innovation during the past 40 years and now can provide stable fixation in the humeral shaft distally as well as improved stability in the head and tuberosity fragments, which were the common site of fixation failure with earlier generation implants. Compared with other fixation strategies, such as locking plate fixation, no compelling evidence exists to suggest one technique over another. The purpose of this review is to describe the history, results, new designs, and techniques that make modern intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures a viable treatment option.

Proximal humerus nailing: a randomized clinical trial between curvilinear and straight nails

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing of displaced proximal humerus fractures is an attractive option in the elderly patient. However, in recent reports, some existing intramedullary nails have shown high rate of complications, so new designs are being developed. The objective of the present study is to report on outcomes and complications when comparing a straight to a curvilinear nail design.

METHODS

We prospectively include 54 patients with Neer's 2- or 3-part proximal humerus fractures. Two were lost to follow-up, 26 were surgically treated with a new straight humeral nail (MultiLoc, Synthes) mean age 69 (range, 47-87 years), and 26 with a curvilinear nail (Polarus, Acumed) mean age 71 (range, 38-89 years). At final follow-up (average 14 months), patients underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Clinical outcome was assessed with the adjusted Constant score.

RESULTS

All but 1 fracture went on to radiographic union. Mean Constant score in the Polarus nail was 72.7 ± 16.0 and 83.3 ± 16.7 in the MultiLoc (P = .246). Symptoms related with rotator cuff disease were present in 19/26 patients (73%) and in 9/26 (34.6%), respectively (P = .001). The mean neck-shaft angle at final follow-up was 135° in the MultiLoc group and 130° in the Polarus group (P > .05). Reoperation rate was 42% for Polarus and 11.5% for MultiLoc.

CONCLUSION

Straight intramedullary nails had a comparable union rate to an accepted curvilinear design, with a much lower incidence of complications. Rotator cuff pain and dysfunction can be minimized with the use of newer generation straight nails.