Quantification of anterior cortical bone removal and intermeniscal ligament damage at the tibial nail entry zone using parapatellar and retropatellar approaches

A Suprapatellar Approach, When Compared With an Infrapatellar Approach, Yields Less Anterior Knee Pain and Better Patellofemoral Joint Function, for Intramedullary Nailing of Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess if a suprapatellar (SP) approach, when compared with an infrapatellar (IP) approach, yielded less patient-reported anterior knee pain and higher patellofemoral joint function at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively, when treating tibial fractures with intramedullary nailing.

METHODS

DESIGN

Prospective, parallel-group randomized control trial.

SETTING

Tertiary level 1 trauma care center, Brisbane, Australia.

PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA

Skeletally mature patients with an acute diaphyseal tibial fracture (AO/OTA 41A2/3, 42 A1-43A3) amenable to an intramedullary nailing were included. Exclusion criteria were periprosthetic fractures, nonunions, and presence of a contralateral injury that would restrict weight-bearing.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Anterior knee pain through the visual analog scale (VAS) and patellofemoral function using the Kujala scale at 6 weeks and 12 months were compared between those treated with a SP and IP approach.

RESULTS

Ninety-five tibia fractures were included in the randomized trial, with complete follow-up data for 44 and 46 tibia fractures in the SP and IP groups, respectively. The SP cohort exhibited better patellofemoral knee function at both 6 weeks (Kajula 53.0 for SP vs. 43.2 for IP, P < 0.01) and 12 months (Kujala 92.0 for SP vs. 81.3 for IP, P < 0.01) postoperatively and a reduction in anterior knee pain at 12 months postoperatively (VAS 0.7 SP vs. 2.9 IP, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized trial demonstrated clinically meaningful differences in patellofemoral function, for a SP versus IP approach, with a greater than 10 point discrepancy in Kujala score at both 6 weeks and 12 months. In addition, there was a clinically important difference in VAS knee pain scores for patients at 12 months, but not at 6 weeks, postoperatively. These results contribute to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the functional and clinical benefits of the SP approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing: Future or Fad?

Over the last hundred years, there have been significant advancements in the way the Orthopaedic community treats tibial fractures. More recently, the focus of Orthopaedic trauma surgeons has been comparing the different techniques of insertion for tibial nails, specifically suprapatellar (SPTN) versus infrapatellar. The existing literature is convincing that there does not appear to be any clinically significant differences between suprapatellar and infrapatellar tibial nailing, with some apparent benefits of SPTN. Based on the current body of literature and our personal experience with SPTN, we believe the suprapatellar tibial nail will become the future for most tibial nailing procedures, regardless of fracture pattern. We have seen evidence of improved alignment in both proximal and distal fracture patterns, decreased radiation exposure and operative time, relaxation of the deforming forces, ease of imaging, and static positioning of the leg, which would be helpful for the unassisted surgeon, as well as no difference in anterior knee pain or articular damage within the knee between the two techniques.

Investigating and defining outcomes of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Background

Anterior knee pain is often reported following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. The aetiology remains unclear, but the surgical approach may play an important role. To date, no biomechanically validated method exists to assess patient outcomes specific to anterior knee pain in this cohort. The central aims of this study are to (1) evaluate the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the influence of surgical approach on intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures (suprapatellar versus infrapatellar nailing), (2) explore differences in clinical outcomes between the approaches, and (3) explore the development of a biomechanically validated methodology for assessing post-operative anterior knee pain and knee function specific to intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

Methods

This pilot study will follow a prospective randomised controlled design at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital (South Australia). This study aims to recruit 60 patients between 18 and 60 years old who will be randomly assigned to either the suprapatellar or infrapatellar approach following a decision for intramedullary surgical fixation by the treating surgeon. All nails in this study will be Stryker T2 Alpha nails. Patients will undergo standard radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical assessments in-line with their standard operative care, and complete a number of patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures. Performance-based outcome measures will be assessed utilising three-dimensional motion capture techniques. Follow-up time points are 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Feasibility outcomes include ability to meet enrolment and retention metrics, compliance with all questionnaires and assessment procedures, and the occurrence of any adverse events. The primary clinical outcome is the incidence of anterior knee pain at 12 months after surgery.

Discussion

This study will establish the feasibility and inform the design of a large-scale RCT. Evaluation of all clinical data and patient outcomes will lead to the development of a new tool for assessing patient outcomes in this cohort. Limitations of the study include an unpredictable enrolment rate and loss to follow-up, small sample size, and the unknown ability of three-dimensional motion analysis to pick up the effects of anterior knee pain after tibial nailing.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered on the 7 February 2020 on ANZCTR, ACTRN12620000109909.

Comparison between functionality and quality of reduction between suprapatellar vs infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of diaphyseal and distal tibial fractures

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing is the most frequent procedure used for the treatment of tibial fractures that do not involve the articular surfaces. The goal of this study is to analyse the clinical outcomes, time of surgery and use of fluoroscopy in patients with midshaft and distal tibial fractures treated with suprapatellar and infrapatellar nailing and compare the results between these different groups.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted, and patients were selected between the period of March 2018 and October 2019. The following variables were studied: age, gender, AO classification, time of surgery (minutes), time of fluoroscopy (seconds), quality of reduction in postoperative controls and 1 year follow-up (using the angles MPTA, LDTA, PPTA, ADTA). Functional outcomes were studied at 1 month and 1 year follow-up. The visual analogue scale was used to study and compare the postoperative pain of the patients. The Lysholm Knee Score was used to evaluate the functional outcomes of the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this study. The suprapatellar approach was used in 44 patients and the infrapatellar in 36 patients. The time of surgery (p=0.008) and the mean time of use of fluoroscopy (p <0.001) difference were significant in favour of the suprapatellar approach. In the quality of reduction analysis, we have statistically significant results in the LDTA and ADTA angles. Also, in the evaluation of postoperative pain, significant difference was found in favour of the suprapatellar approach.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study compared the suprapatellar approach and the infrapatellar approach for the treatment of midshaft and distal tibia fractures with intramedullary nailing. The results showed lesser time of surgery and use of fluoroscopy, lower knee pain, and lower rate of malalignment with the suprapatellar approach than with the infrapatellar approach.

Retro-patellar approach in telescopic nailing of the tibia in children with osteogenesis imperfecta

PURPOSE

Telescopic intramedullary nailing (TN) has become the main choice of treatment in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). The classical parapatellar tibial nailing technique poses difficulties in maintaining reduction, insertion of the nail and fluoroscopic imaging. Also, deformities of the proximal tibia in relatively small children with OI can be problematic for tibial nailing. In this report, we present the retro-patellar approach in tibial TN of children with OI as an alternative to the classical approach and report the early radiographic and clinical results of our patients.

METHODS

The nail is inserted through a skin incision proximal to the patella, passing inside the patellofemoral joint while the knee is positioned to 15° to 20° of flexion. In total, 30 tibiae of 15 patients had been operated and were reviewed after at least one year of follow-up. Any complications, such as implant failure, joint damage or instability, malunion, nonunion or refracture, were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 8.5 years, and the mean follow-up period was 27 months. There were no complaints involving the knee. All patients showed complete union without any implant failure or refracture. We did not observe any nail protrusion, bending or loss of correction during the procedure.

CONCLUSION

The retro-patellar approach for tibial TN appears to be safe and effective in patients with OI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of suprapatellar (SP)-nailing versus infrapatellar (IP)-nailing of tibia fractures in anterior knee pain, complications (retropatellar chondropathy, infection, and malalignment) and physical functioning and quality of life. A clinical question-driven and thorough systematic review of current literature is provided.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and 2020 relating to SP and IP-nailing of tibia fractures. The study is performed in concordance with PRISMA-guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on outcomes of interest.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was performed independently by 2 assessors. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the McMaster Critical Appraisal.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Continuous variables are presented as means with SD and dichotomous variables as frequency and percentages. The weighted mean, standardized weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence interval were calculated. A pooled analysis could not be performed because of differences in outcome measures, time-points, and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 1447 patients were analyzed. The weighted incidence of anterior knee pain was 29% after SP-nailing and 39% after IP-nailing, without reported significance. There was a significant lower rate of malalignment after the SP-approach (4% vs. 26%) with small absolute differences in all planes. No substantial differences were observed in retropatellar chondropathy, infection, physical functioning, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review does not reveal superiority of either technique in any of the respective outcomes of interest. Definitive choice should depend on the surgeon's experience and available resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing

The suprapatellar nailing technique is an important adjunct in the armamentarium of an orthopedic surgeon. Although a variety of new instrumentations are required for insertion of the suprapatellar nail, most companies now carry these instruments. Easier positioning, maintenance of reduction, ease of intraoperative fluoroscopy, more anatomic starting trajectory, decreased malreduction rates, and possible decrease in anterior knee pain are all benefits of suprapatellar nailing, thus making mastery of this technique essential for an orthopedic surgeon.

Improved Outcomes With Semi-extended Nailing of Tibial Fractures? A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the existing literature to determine whether knee pain and function following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures differs significantly by surgical technique-specifically with semi-extended nailing versus traditional infrapatellar approaches.

DATA SOURCE

A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database was conducted on August 15, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

We included level I-level III studies that examined outcomes of tibial intramedullary nailing utilizing a semi-extended technique. All included studies reported Lysholm Knee Scores with minimum clinical follow-up of 1 year. Non-English language literature and studies older than 20 years were not included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from each study were independently recorded by 2 reviewers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Two prospective, randomized trials and 4 retrospective cohort studies were included in this review. A meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence comparing postoperative knee pain and functional outcomes between semi-extended and traditional infrapatellar nailing is limited. Available literature suggests satisfactory outcomes with semi-extended nailing. The highest level of evidence available does indicate improved pain and function with semi-extended nailing as compared to infrapatellar nailing. Additional research may be required to reach consensus conclusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Importance of Mechanoreceptors and Other Neural Structures Within the Anterior Intermeniscal Ligament in the Etiology of Anterior Knee Pain After Tibial Nailing

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain is the most common complication after intramedullary tibial nailing. The cause is often multifactorial and varies among individuals. Violation of the anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIL) during intramedullary tibial nailing might be a possible source of postsurgical anterior knee pain. Although there is a certain ambiguity regarding the importance and function of the AIL, neural structures in the AIL tissue might play a significant role with respect to functional purposes and pain perception.

METHODS

We subjected 6 AIL specimens to histologic examination to identify the neural structures that are a mandatory requirement as a source of anterior knee pain. Specifically, we performed three-dimensional immunohistochemical investigation of subtyping, orientation, and detailed characterization of neural structures within the AIL tissue.

RESULTS

Histologic and three-dimensional immunohistochemical examinations confirmed the presence of neural structures in all 6 AIL specimens. We identified myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers, as well as all types of mechanoreceptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Free nerve endings are a mandatory requirement for pain perception as a result of AIL violation during tibial nailing. Our verification of all different types of mechanoreceptors in the AIL tissue makes a role of the ligament in knee joint function and proprioception highly probable. Further investigations are necessary to clarify possible correlations between neural supply and function of the AIL. Violation of the ligament during operative procedures should be avoided, although the significance of the AIL is still debated.

Anterior intermeniscal ligament: frequency in MRI studies and spatial relationship to the entry point for intramedullary tibial nailing related to the risk of iatrogenic violation

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain is the most common complication after intramedullary tibial nailing. Often, the cause is multifactorial and individually different. Violation of the anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIL) during intramedullary tibial nailing might be a possible origin of postsurgical anterior knee pain. Both the importance and function of the AIL remain somewhat ambivalent, and even the figures quoted in the literature for its existence in the population vary drastically. Our aim was to verify the estimated frequency of the AIL in the literature by retrospectively analysing the data of MRI studies conducted at our hospital. In addition, we attempted to assess the potential risk of AIL violation during intramedullary tibial nailing, based on the spatial arrangement.

METHODS

Two independent examiners analysed the images generated in 351 MRI studies conducted at our hospital between June 2013 and May 2014. All cases who did not reveal any previous knee-joint injury or osteoarthritis of the knee were allocated to group I. All other cases were included in group II. To estimate the potential risk of AIL injury during the nailing procedure, the distance between the AIL and the theoretical entry point for intramedullary nailing was measured.

RESULTS

We identified the AIL on the images of nearly all patients (96.5%) in group I. In group II, the presence of the AIL was confirmed in only 51.4% of cases (p < 0.001). The average distance between the AIL and theoretical entry point for intramedullary tibial nailing was 10.1 mm (range 3.48-18.88 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Because we were able to confirm the presence of the AIL in nearly all patients without a history of knee joint injuries or osteoarthrosis, we presume that the AIL may play a role in knee joint function. Violation of the AIL during intramedullary nailing appears likely due to the close position of the AIL in relation to the entry point for the inserted nail. As a result and due to its rich sensory innervation, a connection between AIL violation during tibial nailing and postoperative onset of anterior knee pain seems likely. To eliminate one risk factor of anterior knee pain development and in view of the unresolved issues of AIL function, violation of the ligament during any operative procedure should be avoided.

Intramedullary Nailing of Periarticular Fractures

Plate fixation has historically been the preferred surgical treatment method for periarticular fractures of the lower extremity. This trend has stemmed from difficulties with fracture reduction and concerns of inadequate fixation with intramedullary implants. However, the body of literature on management of periarticular fractures of the lower extremities has expanded in recent years, indicating that intramedullary nailing of distal femur, proximal tibia, and distal tibia fractures may be the preferred method of treatment in some cases. Intramedullary nailing reliably leads to excellent outcomes when performed for appropriate indications and when potential difficulties are recognized and addressed.

No Incidence of Postoperative Knee Sepsis With Suprapatellar Nailing of Open Tibia Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of knee sepsis after suprapatellar (SP) nailing of open tibia fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective; Setting: ACS level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

We reviewed 139 open tibia fractures that underwent SP nailing as definitive treatment over a 5-year period (January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2016). Most patients (90%, n = 126) underwent intramedullary nailing at the time of their initial surgery. We defined knee sepsis as intra-articular infection requiring operative debridement, either open or arthroscopically, within 1 month's time.

INTERVENTION

Open tibia fractures treated with an SP tibial nail.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Demographic data, fracture characteristics, Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures, and occurrence of knee sepsis.

RESULTS

In 139 open tibia fractures, there were no cases of knee sepsis in the 30 days after treatment with an SP intramedullary nail. Eighty-seven percent of our cohort had Gustilo and Anderson type II (41%) or type III (46%) open fractures. Most open fractures (83%) underwent primary wound closure during the index procedures. Twenty-five limbs (18%) had evidence of infection at the open fracture site of their open fracture necessitating operative intervention and/or antibiotics: none, however, developed knee sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the SP approach carries intra-articular risks, we found a low risk of knee sepsis using this technique in the treatment of open tibia fractures. Our data suggest that there is no greater risk of intra-articular infection using an SP portal as compared with an infrapatellar one.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Character, Incidence, and Predictors of Knee Pain and Activity After Infrapatellar Intramedullary Nailing of an Isolated Tibia Fracture

OBJECTIVE

To study the activity and incidence of knee pain after sustaining an isolated tibia fracture treated with an infrapatellar intramedullary nail at 1 year.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospective cohort.

SETTING

Multicenter Academic and Community hospitals.

PATIENTS

Four hundred thirty-seven patients with an isolated tibia fracture completed a 12-month assessment on pain and self-reported activity.

INTERVENTION

Infrapatellar intramedullary nail.

OUTCOMES

Demographic information, comorbid conditions, injury characteristics, and surgical technique were recorded. Knee pain was defined on a 1-7 scale with 1 being "no pain" and 7 being a "very great deal of pain." Knee pain >4 was considered clinically significant. Patients reported if they were "able," "able with difficulty," or "unable" to perform the following activities: kneel, run, climb stairs, and walk prolonged. Variables were tested in multilevel multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

In knee pain, 11% of patients reported a "good deal" to a "very great deal" of pain (>4), and 52% of patients reported "no" or "very little" pain at 12 months. In activity at 12 months, 26% and 29% of patients were unable to kneel or run, respectively, and 31% and 35% of patients, respectively, stated they were able with difficulty or unable to use stairs or walk.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically significant knee pain (>4/7) was present in 11% of patients 1 year after a tibia fracture. Of note, 31%-71% of patients had difficulty performing or were unable to perform routine daily activities of kneeling, running, and stair climbing, or walking prolonged distances.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Controversies in the intramedullary nailing of proximal and distal tibia fractures

Management of tibia fractures by internal fixation, particularly intramedullary nails, has become the standard for diaphyseal fractures. However, for metaphyseal fractures or those at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction, choice of fixation device and technique is controversial. For distal tibia fractures, nailing and plating techniques may be used, the primary goal of each being to achieve acceptable alignment with minimal complications. Different techniques for reduction of these fractures are available and can be applied with either fixation device. Overall outcomes appear to be nearly equivalent, with minor differences in complications. Proximal tibia fractures can be fixed using nailing, which is associated with deformity of the proximal short segment. A newer technique-suprapatellar nailing-may minimize these problems, and use of this method has been increasing in trauma centers. However, most of the data are still largely based on case series.

Techniques for intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures

Despite poor early results with intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibia fractures, improvements in surgical technique and implant design modifications have resulted in more acceptable outcomes. However, prevention of the commonly encountered apex anterior and/or valgus deformities remains a challenge when treating these injuries. It is necessary for the surgeon to recognize this and know how to neutralize these forces. Surgeons should be comfortable using a variety of the reduction techniques presented to minimize fracture malalignment.