Treatment of late-presenting Monteggia variant with an isolated, simple flexion ulnar osteotomy

Surgical treatment of chronic anterior radial head dislocations in missed Monteggia lesions in children: A rationale for treatment and pearls and pitfalls of surgery

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of chronic radial head dislocations after Monteggia lesions in children can be challenging. This article provides a detailed description of the most frequently performed surgical technique: an ulna osteotomy followed by annular ligament reconstruction. Accordingly, we present the clinical and radiological results of 10 paediatric cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All paediatric patients that had a corrective osteotomy of the ulna for a missed Monteggia lesion between 2008 and 2014 were evaluated with standard radiographs and clinical examination. A literature search was performed to identify the relevant pearls and pitfalls of surgery. Primary outcome was range of motion.

RESULTS

We included 10 patients, with a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. Postoperative range of motion generally improved 30.7°. Even in a patient with obvious deformity of the radial head, range of motion improved after surgery, without residual dislocation of the radial head.

CONCLUSION

Corrective proximal ulna osteotomy with rigid plate fixation and annular ligament reconstruction yields good results in patients with chronic radial head dislocation following a Monteggia lesion. Surgery should be considered regardless of patient age or time since trauma. Given substantial arguments in literature, we discourage surgery if a CT scan shows dome-shaped radial head dysmorphic features in work-up to surgery.

The use of external fixation for the management of acute and chronic Monteggia fractures in children

PURPOSE

The main objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acute (AMF) and chronic Monteggia fractures (CMF) in children treated by closed or open reduction and external fixation (EF).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 26 patients with Monteggia fracture. Patients with AMF (time between trauma and surgery less than two weeks) were treated by closed reduction and EF of the ulna (Group A; 15 patients) while those with CMF (time between trauma and surgery more than three weeks) were managed by closed or open reduction and EF of the ulna (Group B; 11 patients). Clinical outcome was evaluated with radiography and the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome questionnaire (Quick DASH). Complications were recorded in both groups.

RESULTS

No secondary displacement, wire migration, consolidation delays, nonunion, malunion or re-fracture was noted. However, one patient in Group A (6.7%) developed heterotopic ossification of the ulna; the final functional outcome was good (Quick DASH score: 18.2). One case of postoperative redislocation of the radial head was detected in Group B (9.1%). Two patients (7.6%) developed transient pin tract infection. Despite the fact that 16 out of 26 patients (six in Group A and ten in Group B) complained of the clinical appearance and/or had intermittent residual pain on the injured side, the results were essentially the same between the two groups of patients (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EF is an alternative for the management of acute and chronic paediatric Monteggia fractures. It provides satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes with relatively low rates of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Monteggia injuries

The Monteggia injury is defined as radial head dislocation with a fracture of the ulnar shaft. This combination should be sought routinely in patients with ulnar fractures, even when the displacement is small. The emergent management is simple, as reducing the ulnar fracture is usually sufficient to stabilise the radial head. Internal fixation of the ulna deserves to be widely used to fully stabilise the radial head. Irreducibility of the radial head at the acute stage may indicate an interposition, which requires open surgery on the joint. Radial head dislocation may occur even with minimal displacement of the ulnar fragment. Chronic Monteggia fractures are more challenging to treat and their outcomes are more variable. The radial head becomes irreducible after 2 to 3 weeks. When a simple surgical approach fails to ensure stable reduction, the most widely used method at present is open reduction of the radial head and proximal osteotomy of the ulnar shaft. Stability must be obtained intra-operatively. Without treatment, radial head dislocation may be well tolerated for several months or even years. In the long term, however, osteoarticular remodelling results in loss of joint congruence, pain and, eventually, osteoarthritis. Radiographs must therefore be obtained on an emergency basis and analysed with great care to avoid missing a Monteggia fracture.

Open reduction combined with CORA-based osteotomy of the ulna in the treatment of missed Bado type I Monteggia injury: A retrospective study of 5 cases

Open reduction combined with ulnar osteotomy is the most common approach to treating missed Monteggia injuries. The osteotomy is usually performed at the proximal ulna to ensure better healing and fewer complications. The purpose of this study is to present a center of rotation angulation (CORA)-based osteotomy of the ulna for treating Bado type I Monteggia injuries.We retrospectively reviewed the cases of patients who were treated with open reduction combined with a CORA-based ulnar osteotomy between February 2014 and December 2016. Each patient provided his or her internal control, and paired data of the involved and uninvolved sides were analyzed to evaluate forearm rotation function.Five patients (3 male, 2 female) with median age 5.7 years (range, 3.4-6.8 years) were operated on by the senior author in our hospital. The median interval between the original injury and the corrective surgery was 3 months (range, 1-4 months). In a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 6-17 months), all patients obtained stable reduction of the radial head and uneventful healing of the ulnar osteotomy. All patients had pain-free elbows with no neurological or vascular complications and no implant breakage. Patients showed excellent outcomes evaluated using the Broberg and Morrey index.Open reduction with a CORA-based osteotomy of the ulna for the treatment of missed Bado type I Monteggia injury with an obvious ulnar bowing deformity resulted in stable reduction of the radial head and excellent forearm function.

Impact of Open Reduction on Surgical Strategies for Missed Monteggia Fracture in Children

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to review our cases of missed Monteggia fracture treated by open reduction of the radial head with or without ulnar osteotomy and to investigate the indications for open reduction alone in surgical treatment of missed Monteggia fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who presented with missed Monteggia fracture. The patients' mean age at the time of surgery was 7.6 years. The mean interval from injury to surgery was 16.1 months. The surgical procedure consisted of open reduction of the radiocapitellar joint followed by ulnar osteotomy without reconstruction of the annular ligament. The mean period of follow-up was 3.8 years. Radiographic assessment was performed for the maximum ulnar bow (MUB) and the location of the MUB. Clinical results were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index and Kim's scores.

RESULTS

Five patients underwent open reduction alone, and 17 patients underwent open reduction and ulnar osteotomy. When the MUB was less than 4 mm and the location of the MUB was in the distal 40% of the ulna, we could achieve reduction of the radial head without ulnar osteotomy. The radial head was maintained in a completely reduced position in 21 patients and was dislocated in one patient at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Open reduction alone can be an attractive surgical option in select patients with missed Monteggia fracture with minimal bowing of the distal ulna. However, ulnar osteotomy should be considered in patients with a definite ulnar deformity.