A meta-analysis of flexible intramedullary nailing versus external fixation for pediatric femoral shaft fractures

Submuscular plating vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femur fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of submuscular plating (SMP) vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the treatment of pediatric femur shaft fracture.

Method

Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of SMP and ESIN in pediatric shaft fracture were retrieved from five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, and Web of Science) from inception to March 2023 using a systematic literature search strategy. A total of 13 outcome measures, such as perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results, were included in the meta-analysis.

Results

Eight eligible studies involving 491 patients were included in the narrative synthesis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Meta-analysis showed reduced radiation time (RT), soft tissue irritation and angular deformation in the SMP group than in the ESIN group. However, the SMP group had greater estimated blood loss (EBL) than the ESIN group. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS), implant removal, complications requiring surgery, Flynn score, incidence of infection, fracture healing time, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) were similar between the two groups. Only one study reported higher incidences of fracture nonunion or delayed healing in the ESIN group.

Conclusion

SMP is an effective and safe intervention superior to ESIN in reducing soft tissue irritation, angular deformation and radiation time. Given the presence of potential bias and heterogeneity, surgeons should select the treatment that would provide the best outcomes for EBL, LOS, operation time, and bone nonunion or delayed healing based on their experience.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023404118, Identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021228512).

Elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation versus submuscular plate fixation of pediatric femur shaft fractures in school age patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies of clinical outcomes that compare the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) with the submuscular plate (SMP) were controversial. The meta-analysis was performed to summarize existing evidence, aiming to determine whether ESIN was superior to SMP in pediatric femur shaft fractures.

METHODS

Search strategies followed the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. Electronic searches such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane were systematically searched for publications concerning ESIN and SMP from the inception date to March 2023. Two investigators independently searched, screened, and reviewed the full text of the article. Disagreements generated throughout the process were resolved by consensus, and if divergences remain, they were arbitrated by a third author.

RESULTS

This study included 8 articles, comprising a total of 561 patients with a similar baseline. Compared to the SMP, the ESIN had shorter operation time (mean difference = -16.16; 95% CI = -22.83 to -9.48, P < .00001), and less intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = -53.62; 95% CI = -58.89 to -48.36, P < .00001), but had a higher incidence of implant irritation (odds ratio [OR] = 6.49; 95% CI = 3.01 to 13.98, P < .0001), lower limb malalignment (OR = 2.60; 95% CI = 1.12 to 6.04, P = .96) and overall complications(OR = 4.14; 95% CI = 2.51 to 6.84, P < .0001). And there was no significant difference in radiation time, length of hospital stay, limb length discrepancy, infection rate, delayed union rate and unplanned revised surgery rate (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the SMP, the ESIN offers shorter operative time, and less blood loss. However, the SMP is superior to ESINs in complication rates, especially regarding implant irritation and malalignment. Both methods could achieve excellent satisfactory functional outcomes. Thus, the SMP is an alternative choice in the pediatric femur shaft fracture.

Pediatric fractures following implant removal: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the available literature for postoperative fracture rates following implant removal in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A systematic review of articles in the PubMed and Embase computerized literature databases from January 2000 to June 2022 was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, cohort studies (retrospective and prospective), and case series involving pediatric patients that included data on fracture rate following removal of orthopedic implants were eligible for review. Two authors independently extracted data from selected studies for predefined data fields for implant type, anatomic location of the implant, indication for implantation, fracture or refracture rate following implant removal, mean time to implant removal, and mean follow-up time.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Reported fracture rates following implant removal vary based on several factors, with an overall reported incidence of 0%-14.9%. The available literature did not offer sufficient data for conduction of a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review demonstrates that fracture following implant removal in pediatric patients is a relatively frequent complication. In children, the forearm and femur are the most commonly reported sites of fracture following removal of implants. Traumatic fractures treated definitively with external fixation have the highest reported aggregate rate of refracture. Knowledge of the incidence of this risk is important for orthopedic surgeons. There remains a need for well-designed studies and trials to further clarify the roles of the variables that contribute to this complication.

Çocuk femur ve tibia şaft kırıklarında kapalı redüksiyon ve titanyum elastik çivileme

Amaç: Bu çalışmada femur ve tibia diyafiz kırıklarında titanyum elastik çivileme (TEÇ) ile tedavi edilen çocuk hastaların klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: TEÇ uygulanan 49 (15 kız, 34 erkek) femur diyafiz kırığı (FK grubu) ve 35 (12 kız, 23 erkek) tibia diyafiz kırığı (TK grubu) geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Ameliyata kadar geçen süre (gün), hastanede kalış süresi (gün), kemik kaynama süresi (ay) ve implant çıkarma süresi (ay) kayıt altına alındı. Son kontrolde, bacak uzunluk farkı (mm), açılanma, kalça ve diz eklemi hareket açıklıkları ölçüldü. Klinik skorlama için Flynn skorlaması kullanıldı. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması FK grubunda 7,96, TK grubunda ise 9,34 yıl idi. Ortalama takip süresi FK grubunda 51,3 ay, TK grubunda ise 58,3 ay idi. Ortalama hastanede yatış süresi her iki grup için 1,4 gün olarak bulundu. Ortalama kırık kaynama süreleri FK ve TK grubunda sırasıyla 9,7 hafta ve 10,7 haftaydı. Ortalama implant çıkarma süreleri ise FK ve TK grubunda sırasıyla 7,1 ay ve 6,22 ay idi. Flynn skorları FK grubunda 3 hastada kötü, 6 hastada başarılı ve 40 hastada mükemmel; TK grubunda ise 1 hastada kötü, 2 hastada başarılı ve 32 hastada mükemmel olarak hesaplandı. Tüm hastalarda kemik kaynaması sağlandı. Sonuç: Titanyum elastik çivi ile kanal içi sabitleme yüksek tatmin edici klinik sonuçları ve düşük komplikasyon oranı ile birlikte çocuk femur ve tibia şaft kırıklarında başarılı bir tedavi yöntemidir.

Risk of complications following surgical fixation of femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is debate regarding the optimal surgical technique for fixing femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12 years. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have issued relevant guidelines, however, there is limited evidence to support these. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the complication rate following flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN), plate fixation and external fixation (EF) for traumatic femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases for interventional and observational studies. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed quality and extracted data from the identified studies. The primary outcome was the risk of any complication. Secondary outcomes assessed the risk of pre-specified individual complications.

RESULTS

Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 19 observational studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Within the RCTs, five analysed FIN (n = 161), two analysed plates (n = 51) and five analysed EF (n = 168). Within the observational studies, 13 analysed FIN (n = 610), seven analysed plates (n = 214) and six analysed EF (n = 153). The overall risk of complications was lower following plate fixation when compared to FIN fixation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73, p = 0.001) in the observational studies. The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to FIN fixation in both RCTs (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.01, p = 0.003) and observational studies (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.58, p<0.001). The overall risk of complications was higher following EF when compared to plate fixation in both RCTs (RR 7.42, 95% CI 1.84 to 29.98, p = 0.005) and observational studies (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.30, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although NICE and the AAOS recommend FIN for femoral diaphyseal fractures in children aged 4 to 12, this study reports a significantly decreased relative risk of complications when these injuries are managed with plates. The overall quality of evidence is low, highlighting the need for a rigorous prospective multicentre randomised trial at low risk of bias due to randomisation and outcome measurement to identify if any fixation technique is superior.

The Bisaccia and Meccariello technique in pediatric femoral shaft fractures with intramedullary titanium nail osteosynthesis linked external-fixator (IOLE): validity and reliability

Background:

Over the last 20 years, the incidence of pediatric femoral shaft fractures was increased, due to changes in the children’s daily activities. The healing times are different according to the chosen treatment and to other factors such as age, type of fracture, the involvement of the soft tissues, and concomitance with other injuries. The Bisaccia and Meccariello technique (Intramedullary titanium nail Osteosynthesis Linked External-fixator -IOLE) was born to prevent rotationally and lengthening malunion or nonunion in the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

Hypotheis:

The aim or the objective of this paper is to compare the IOLE with the two most used methods for the treatment of femoral fractures in children.

Methods:

From 2000 to 2016, 58 pediatric patients with femoral shaft fractures were surgically treated and enrolled in the study. The ranged age of the patients was between 3 and 15 years. Twenty-two patients were treated with endomedullary titanium nails (TEN), 22 with external axial or modular external fixators and 14 patients treated with IOLE technique. The IOLE technique, in brief, is the hybridization of titanium intramedullary nails with a modular external fixator. It is divided into three phases, the first revenue given the length of the femur with the external fixator; the second, the rotations are dominated by the elastic nails; and the third finally they are hybridized on the external fixator. Comparing the three groups, radiographic images were taken to assess fracture reduction and consolidation.

Results:

At the final follow-up, statistically significant differences in not weight-bearing times were found in favor of the IOLE group. There were no statistical differences between three groups in terms of significant rotation defects, angulation, growth, and/or nonunion.

Conclusions:

The Bisaccia- Meccariello technique (IOLE) showed to lead to healing the pediatric femoral shaft fracture of the femur but allows an early weight-bearing to these patients and normal life like that.

Treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures in children aged 2-10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review current literature on treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures in children of 2-10 years old, with subgroup analysis of children aged 2-6 years, comparing intramedullary nailing (IMN) to conservative treatment modalities.

METHODS

We included clinical trials and observational studies that compared traction and subsequent casting (TSC), spica casting and IMN for treatment of femur shaft fractures in children of 2-10 years of age. Subgroup analysis of children aged 2-6 years was performed.

RESULTS

Compared to treatment with immediate spica casting, IMN led to significantly less coronal angulation (mean difference (MD): 2.03 degrees, confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.90), less sagittal angulation (MD: 1.59 degrees, CI 0.82-2.35) and lower rates of LLD (Risk difference (RD): 0.07, CI 0.03-0.11). In terms of rehabilitation, IMN leaded to shorter time until walking with aids (MD: 31.53 days, CI 16.02-47.03), shorter time until independent ambulation (MD: 26.59 days, CI 22.07, 31.11) and shorter time until full weight bearing (MD: 27.05 days, CI 6.11, 47,99). Compared to TSC, IMN led to a lower rate of malunion (RD: 0.31, CI 0.05-0.56), shorter hospital stays (MD: 12.48 days, CI 11.57, 13.39), time until walking with aids (MD: 54.55, CI 40.05-69.04) and full weight bearing (MD: 27.05 days [6.11, 47,99]).

CONCLUSION

Although a lack of quality evidence, this systematic review showed a clear tendency to treatment with elastic intramedullary nails of femoral shaft fractures in children of 2-10 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Risk factors for refracture of the femoral shaft in children after removal of external fixation

Background

External fixation is the primary treatment option in children for femoral shaft fractures, such as open femoral or multiple fractures. One complication is refracture, which is the biggest limitation of fixation devices. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with refracture after the removal of external fixation devices and decrease the frequency of refracture.

Materials and methods

Retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 165 patients treated at our hospital for fresh femoral shaft fractures with external fixation between May 2009 and February 2018 were included in this study. Patients with pathological fractures, fractures of the femoral neck, fractures that were fixed using plates or elastic stable intramedullary nailing, and old fractures, as well as those who underwent postoperative femoral surgery were excluded. Potential risk factors included: patient age, gender, and weight, fracture sides, open or closed fracture, fracture sites, reduction methods, operation time, perioperative bleeding, number and diameter of the screws, and immobilization time. These factors were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses.

Results

Femoral shaft refracture developed in 24 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that refracture was not statistically significantly associated with any of the above factors, except AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF) classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio (L2, length of femur fixed by the two screws farthest from the fracture line; L3, the total length from the greater trochanter to the distal end of femur; P < 0.001 and P = 0.0141, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were also independent risk factors for femoral refracture.

Conclusions

Femoral shaft refracture is relatively common in children treated with external fixation. Because of the limited number of cases in this study, we cautiously concluded that the PCCF classification type 32-D/4.2 and L2/L3 ratio were independent risk factors for femoral shaft refracture in these patients.

Level of evidence

IV

Operative Choice for Length-Unstable Femoral Shaft Fracture in School-Aged Children: Locking Plate vs. Monolateral External Fixator

BACKGROUND

Locking plate (LP) is a good choice in the treatment of length-unstable femoral shaft fracture in children. Monolateral external fixator (EF) has been reported for this condition for decades. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of school-aged children with length-unstable femoral shaft fracture treated with LP vs. EF.

METHODS

Patients aged 5-11 years old with length-unstable femoral shaft fractures treated at our institute from January 2014 to January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into LP and EF groups. The preoperative data, including baseline information of the patients, radiographic parameters, and types of surgical procedure, were collected from the hospital database, and postoperative data, including complications, were collected during the follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 patients (average, 8.2 ± 2.1 years; male, 20; female, 16) in the LP group and 35 patients (average, 8.3 ± 2.3 years; male 20, female 15) in the EF group were included. There was significantly less operative time for EF (45.4 ± 7.8 min) compared with LP (67.8 ± 11.3 min) (P < 0.001). As for the frequency of fluoroscopy, there was a significant difference between the EF (13.9 ± 2.4) and LP (16.5 ± 3.2) groups (p < 0.001). The rate of major complications was not significantly different between these two groups. There was a significant difference between the EF group (11.2 ± 5.8 mm) and the LP group (7.5 ± 1.6 mm) group concerning limb length discrepancy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both LP and EF produce satisfactory outcomes in school-aged children with length unstable femoral shaft fractures. External fixation remains a viable choice without the necessity of secondary surgery for hardware removal.

Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey

Background

This survey aims to assess the satisfaction of patients who have had treatment using external fixation (EF).

Materials and methods

An original questionnaire and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) were distributed to 121 patients who underwent treatment using EF for deformity correction and lengthening between 2006 and 2016. A multivariate analysis was performed on the factors associated with satisfaction.

Results

Sixty patients returned a response. The average satisfaction score was 83.6 points. In the 5-point satisfaction survey, 43 of 60 patients (71.7%) responded “very satisfied” or “satisfied” and 27 patients (45.0%) responded “yes” to the question as to whether they would request EF treatment again if presenting with the original preoperative condition. In addition, the subjectively expressed tolerance for having an external fixator device on the limb was 92.1 days on average. A correlation was established with the ISOLS score.

Conclusion

The top three factors that determined subjective inconvenience with EF are pain, walking, and heaviness. Although EF treatment was stressful, the satisfaction scores were high. Furthermore, the satisfaction with EF treatment was improved by (1) pain control, (2) shortening the EF period, and (3) psychological support.

How to cite this article

Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Kato S, et al. Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):27–31.

TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC FEMORAL FRACTURES IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB

Femur fractures in children can be treated with a number of operative and conservative methods. Numerous factors determine which method is optimal for a specific fracture. The aim of this research was to analyze distribution of femur fractures in children living in the urban communities of Zagreb and Zagreb County by localization, type and frequency of treatment methods used according to age and fracture mechanism. The research included 103 children aged up to 18 years, treated for femur fractures at the Zagreb University Hospital Centre and Zagreb Children’s Hospital. Data were collected from these institutions and a retrospective study covered the 2010-2015 period. The cause of fracture and diagnosis were coded with the help of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Operative treatment was applied in 55% of cases, which is contrary to previous researches. The highest incidence of femur fractures was recorded in the 0- to 4-year age groups, accounting for 49.1% of all fractures. These fractures mostly occurred due to falls and were more often treated with non-operative methods. All other age groups were mostly treated with operative methods. Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods, whereas flexible intramedullary nailing was the most frequently used operative method. The treatment depended on age, complexity of the fracture, fracture type, fragment displacement, and associated injuries. The cause was also an important factor on choosing the treatment method. Non-operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by falls (64.71% of cases due to falls) and operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by traffic accidents (79.4% of cases due to traffic accidents). It is a wide-known opinion that the best treatment for femur fractures in children is non-operative treatment. However, recent studies have shown that the use of operative methods in femur fracture treatment is growing. Our cohort of children treated during a five-year period (2010-2015) also underwent operative treatment more often than non-operative one. Two non-operative and eight operative methods were used. With such a large number of methods, it is clear that there is no unique method for all fractures. However, it is clear that the trend of using operative treatment is connected to the perennial trend of considerable sociodemographic and socioeconomic changes in urban settings such as Zagreb. Lifestyle changes directly affect the prevalence of femur fractures among children, as well as approach to treatment choice. General opinion is that most of fractures that occur at an early age can be treated with non-operative methods. Our research on femur fractures in children confirmed this rule. The youngest age group that had the highest incidence of fractures (49.1% of all fractures) was treated with non-operative methods in 75% of cases. Operative methods prevailed in other age groups. Similar results have been published by other authors. In conclusion, nearly half of all femur fractures (49.1%) occurred at a young age (0-4 years). Diaphysis fractures were most common. Most of the fractures that occurred during the 2010-2015 period were treated with operative methods, mostly in children aged 5-9 years. Out of eight different operative methods, elastic stable intramedullary osteosynthesis was most frequently used (60%). Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods.

Treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures with elastic stable intramedullary nails versus external fixation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is currently a debate about whether elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN) or external fixation (EF) is the best surgical method for treating pediatric femoral shaft fractures. We performed a meta-analysis to determine which surgical method leads to higher treatment satisfaction, lower complication rates, and reduced treatment time, to investigate whether ESIN is the preferred surgical method for treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Relevant databases were searched for comparative studies of ESIN versus EF for the treating pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Literature reports and quality evaluations were extracted, followed by a systematic review using RevMan 5.3 software. Treatment satisfaction at the last follow-up, primary complications, secondary complications, and relevant time indicators (operation time, hospital stay, clinical healing time, bone healing time) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 reports were included in this meta-analysis. We found no statistical differences in the treatment satisfaction at the last follow-up between ESIN and EF for the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. A low rate of postoperative re-fracture (RR=3.58, 95% CI (1.85, 6.92), p=0.0001) and postoperative infection (RR=9.25, 95% CI (5.32, 16.11), p<0.00001), and a high risk of skin irritation (RR=0.15, 95% CI (0.06, 0.37), p<0.00001) were found in the ESIN group. No significant differences between the two approaches were found regarding malunion. A low rate of limb-length discrepancy (RR=2.41, 95% CI (1.40, 4.17), p=0.002), hospitalization (SMD=0.84, 95% CI (0.24, 1.43), p=0.006), clinical healing time (SMD=0.95, 95% CI (0.56, 1.33), p<0.00001) and bone healing time (SMD=0.89, 95% CI (0.39, 1.40), p=0.005) were found in the ESIN group, as compared to that in the EF group. No significant differences were found in fixation failure, activity limitation of the joint, and operation time between the two strategies.

DISCUSSION

ESIN should be the primary choice for the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures since it has a reliable curative effect and results in a shorter hospital stay, faster fracture healing, and fewer complications. EF is recommended for fractures with serious injury of the soft tissue to avoid intramedullary infection. Double-blind high-quality randomized studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm our conclusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Four interventions for pediatric femoral shaft fractures: Network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the pediatric femoral shaft are uncommon, although serious injuries could lead to long-term disability, pain and an impaired quality of life. There are 4 main interventions: cast (C), plate fixation (PF), titanium elastic nail (TEN) and external fixation (EF). However, for pediatric patients under the age of 16, which intervention is the best choice remains a controversial topic. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to summarize existing studies and to compare the safety and efficacy of the interventions for pediatric femoral shaft fractures.

METHODS

We searched through eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, Wangfang, and VIP) for randomized controlled trials of femoral shaft fracture in pediatric patients, which were published until the end of March 2020. We performed a Bayesian NMA to integrate the adverse events and fracture union time of all interventions.

RESULT

Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with a total number of 1627 patients were included in our NMA. Among these patients, 386 patients underwent C, 524 patients underwent PF, 574 patients underwent TEN, and 143 patients underwent EF. In terms of adverse events, C had the lowest infection rates and TEN the second lowest infection rates. TEN also had the lowest anchylosis and malunion rates. In addition, TEN had a lower fracture union time than C, PF and EF. Notably, C showed the weakest effects on reducing malunion rates in pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

This current study indicated that TEN has potential superior clinical outcomes in pediatric femoral shaft fractures compared to C, PF and PF. However, high-quality large sample RCTs are still needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.