Telehealth: a novel approach for the treatment of nondisplaced pediatric elbow fractures

Do live-stream telemedicine follow-up appointments for a Ponseti-treated clubfoot caseload compare favourably with a face-to-face review? Observed clinical outcomes and treatment provision during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Restrictions on face-to-face (F2F) healthcare services during the recent COVID-19 pandemic necessitated novel provision of care for Ponseti-treated clubfoot patients. This retrospective review compares the effectiveness of telemedicine (TM) using live-stream videoconferencing compared to conventional F2F review, in two cohorts of 78 patients attending routine follow-up, during Ponseti-treated clubfoot bracing in their first 5 years.

METHODS

Rates of compliance, recurrence of deformity, and type of intervention provided were compared between cohorts. The TM cohort was re-evaluated F2F as part of routine follow-up care. Attendance rates were compared between cohorts and with an equivalent time period the previous year.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rate of compliance between cohorts (77% in the TM group, 74% in the F2F group), or in the rate of recurrence. Subsequent F2F review of the TM cohort showed that compliance had improved in some patients, indicating successful TM intervention. There were no missed cases of recurrence. TM follow-up appointments offered similar rates of management of skin problems, brace adjustment, and provision of exercises. At least one element of intervention was provided in 64% of the TM group, and 72% of the F2F group. TM connection was successful in 74% of booked appointments. The number of patients attending was similar to F2F bookings one year prior.

DISCUSSION

The use of TM for routine follow-up of Ponseti-treated clubfoot patients can be as clinically effective as F2F assessment, and has potential for integration into routine follow-up care.

Validation of Examination Maneuvers for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in the Telehealth Setting

BACKGROUND

Telehealth visits (THVs) have made it essential to adopt innovative ways to evaluate patients virtually. This study validates a novel THV approach that uses educational videos and an instructional datasheet, enabling parents to use smartphones to measure their child's scoliosis at home or in telehealth settings.

METHODS

We identified a prospective cohort of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) scheduled for follow-up care from March to July 2021. The angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was first measured at home by patients' guardians using instructional video guidance and a smartphone application with internal accelerometer software. The second measurement was made during a THV examination performed by caregivers with supervision by trained associates via a telehealth appointment. Lastly, the clinician measured the child's ATR during an in-person clinic visit. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and interrater reliability were compared between in-person clinic measurements and (1) at-home and (2) THV measurements. Shoulder, lower back, and pelvic asymmetry were observed and quantified at home and virtually, and then were compared with in-person clinic evaluations using kappa values. Surveys were used to evaluate the experience of the patient/caregiver with the at-home and telehealth assessment tools.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included (mean age, 14.1 years; 25% male). There was excellent agreement in the ATR measurements between THVs and in-person visits (ICC = 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 0.92). ATR agreement between at-home and in-person visits was also excellent, but slightly diminished (ICC = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.83). Agreement between THV and in-person measurements was significantly higher compared with that between at-home and in-person measurements (p = 0.04). There was poor agreement in lower back asymmetry between THV and in-person assessments (kappa = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.60); however, there was no significant agreement between at-home and in-person assessments (kappa = 0.06; 95% CI = -0.17 to 0.29). Patient/caregiver satisfaction surveys (n = 70) reported a median score of 4 ("good") for comfort with use of the technology, and a score of 3 ("neutral") for equivalence of THV and in-person evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high level of agreement between telehealth and in-person spine measurements, suggesting that THVs may be reliably used to evaluate AIS, thus improving access to specialized care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Telehealth follow-up in the postoperative care of surgically treated pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

Supracondylar humerus fractures are a common pediatric orthopedic injury requiring surgery. These patients are typically seen 4 weeks post-op for cast and pin removal followed by an 8-12-week post-op motion check. Our study aimed to limit the number of in-office visits by conducting this last motion check by telehealth. This was a single-surgeon series of consecutive surgically treated supracondylar humerus fractures. The primary outcome was the number of patients who completed their range of motion check remotely. Loss to follow-up at the telehealth visit was compared to a prior cohort for whom the range of motion visit was performed in person. Secondary outcomes included number of patients missing work/school for the in-person vs. telehealth visits and satisfaction with the in-person and telehealth visits. Twenty-two patients were enrolled during the study period. Sixteen (73%) successfully completed their telehealth follow-up, which was similar to the prior in-person cohort. Significantly more parents/children had to take a day off from work/school to attend the in-person visit. No patient required a subsequent in-person visit or referral to physical therapy. A total of 100% of patients reported excellent satisfaction with their telehealth visit. Overall satisfaction was similar comparing the in-person vs. telehealth visits (84% vs. 100% reporting excellent satisfaction, P  = 0.12). Telehealth is a viable option for the postoperative care of surgically treated supracondylar humerus fractures. This approach limits in-office visits and decreases the need for parents/children to miss work/school while maintaining excellent satisfaction scores.

Launching telemedicine in a tertiary ambulatory pediatric orthopedic clinic during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic: a retrospective study

Telemedicine services increased dramaticallyduring the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, with limited studies on its implementation within pediatric orthopedics. The goal of this study was to examine patient satisfaction and the efficacy of pediatric orthopedic telemedicine visits. Two hundred and sixty-nine qualifying telehealth visits took place at a metropolitan area pediatric institute between 1 March and 30 May 2020. Patients were invited to complete an anonymous satisfaction survey on their telemedicine experience. Sixty-seven patients responded to the survey. A chart review was completed for all 269 telemedicine visits. Ninety-two percent (249/269) of telemedicine visits were with established patients, and 95% (256/269) of visits were satisfactorily completed without further evaluation, with one visit requiring urgent in-person evaluation. Overall, patients were satisfied with initiating the telemedicine visit (mean score of 4.56/5), as they felt comfortable discussing needs with the provider (4.68/5), and the visit saved time (4.61/5). However, patients were less enthused when deciding if telemedicine was of comparable quality to an in-person visit (3.68/5). Our analysis showed that telemedicine is a viable alternative to in-person visits for various pediatric orthopedic visits, with minimal urgent complications. Patients benefited primarily from the time savings when using a telemedicine visit. However, our study also demonstrates certain limitations of telemedicine, likely due to patients' perceived value of an in-person evaluation. Our study's findings should encourage the continued implementation of pediatric orthopedic telemedicine as an adjunct to in-person clinical practice.

Comparison of Telehealth and In-Person Behavioral Health Services and Payment in a Large Rural Multisite Usual Care Study

Background: Telehealth and in-person behavioral health services have previously shown equal effectiveness, but cost studies have largely been limited to travel savings for telehealth cohorts. The purpose of this analysis was to compare telehealth and in-person cohorts, who received behavioral health services in a large multisite study of usual care treatment approaches to examine relative value units (RVUs) and payment. Methods: We used current procedural terminology codes for each encounter to identify RVUs and Medicare payment rates. Mixed linear regression models compared telehealth and in-person cohorts on RVUs, per-encounter payment rates, and total-episode payment rates. Results: We found the behavioral health services provided by telehealth to have modest, but statistically significantly lower RVUs (i.e., less provider work in time spent and case complexity), per-encounter payments, and total episode payments than the in-person cohort. Despite Medicare rates discounting payments for nonphysician providers and the in-person cohort using clinical social workers more frequently, the services provided by the telehealth cohort still had lower payments. Thus, the differences observed are due to the in-person cohort receiving higher payment RVU services than the telehealth cohort, which was more likely to receive briefer therapy sessions and other less expensive services. Conclusions: Behavioral health services provided by telehealth used services with lower RVUs than behavioral health services provided in-person, on average, even after adjusting for patient demographics and diagnosis. Observed differences in Medicare payments resulted from the provider type and services used by the two cohorts; thus, costs and insurance reimbursements may vary for others.

Telehealth in Orthopedic Sports Medicine: A Survey Study on Patient Satisfaction and Experience

Background: Telehealth has seen breakthroughs in many fields of medicine, but utilization remains limited in orthopedic sports medicine. The purpose of this investigation was to compare patient satisfaction, duration of care, and overall patient experiences with telehealth and in-person clinical visits for sports-related injuries. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted at an orthopedic sports medicine clinic during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic between March and November 2020. Anonymous electronic surveys were used to record patient responses and statistical comparisons were drawn through two-sample t-tests. Results: A total of 175 patients (82 telehealth vs. 93 in-person) consented to participate in this investigation, and all were included in the final analysis. The overall composite satisfaction score, when compared between the two groups, did not differ (p = 0.63). Duration of care was significantly longer in the 93 patients who had in-person clinical visits as compared with the 82 patients who had telehealth visits (61/93: >31 min vs. 75/82: <30 min; p < 0.001). Finally, of the 82 patients who had telehealth, 3 respondents said they were "very unlikely" and "unlikely" to request another virtual clinical visit and/or recommend this mode of health care delivery to friends or family. Of the 93 patients had in-person clinical visits, only 15 respondents stated they were uninterested in telehealth under any circumstance. Conclusion: Most patients presenting to an orthopedic sports medicine clinic are open to telehealth, recognize its utility, and believe it to be just as comparable with in-person clinical visits. Level of Evidence: IV.

New Injury Patterns in Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures During COVID-19: Beds Are the New Monkey Bars

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic drastically altered children's activity patterns. Our goal was to investigate how COVID-19 affected demographics, injury characteristics, treatment patterns, follow-up, and outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for a SCH fracture from May to November 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from May to November 2020 (during COVID-19) at 2 tertiary children's hospitals. Demographic information, injury characteristics, hospital course, and follow-up data were collected and compared.

RESULTS

SCH fractures decreased by >50% from 2019 (149) to 2020 (72). Children in the 2020 cohort were younger (mean 5.2 y old) compared with 2019 (6.0 y old) ( P =0.019). Mechanism of injury was significantly different in 2020 ( P <0.001), as the proportion of trampoline and furniture fractures increased from 8% and 17% to 15% and 33%, respectively. The proportion of playground and monkey bar fractures decreased from 20% and 17% to 3% and 4%, respectively. Distribution of Gartland type and neurovascular injury rates were similar in 2019 and 2020 ( P =0.411 and 0.538). Time from emergency department admission to the operating room and duration of hospital admission were both unchanged from 2019 to 2020 ( P =0.864 and 0.363). The duration of postoperative follow-up in 2019 was 94.5 days compared with 72.8 days in 2020 ( P =0.122), as more pandemic patients were lost to follow up (22.5% vs. 35.2%, P =0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The demographics, mechanism of injury, and follow-up practices of pediatric SCH fractures changed significantly during the pandemic, likely because of school closures and lock-downs changing activity patterns. Different mechanisms of injury affected younger patients and reflected the new ways children played. Trampoline-related and furniture-related injuries overtook the classic playground falls as primary mechanism of injury. Despite the need for COVID-19 testing, there was no delay in time to the operating room. Hospitalization duration did not change, yet postoperative follow-up was shorter, and more patients were lost to follow up. Despite these stressors, outcomes remained excellent in most children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

Patient Preferences Regarding Telemedicine to In-person Consultation: A Questionnaire-Based Survey

Introduction

Telemedicine has been evolving over the last two decades; however, with the advent of the COVID 19 pandemic, its utility and acceptance have drastically increased. Most studies report increasing acceptability and satisfaction rates. This study aimed to assess patient preferences regarding telemedicine to in-person consultations and to attempt to assess the factors driving these preferences.

Material and Methods

A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted for patients who had both teleconsultation and in-person consultation in the orthopedic outpatient. After obtaining consent to participate in the study, the patients were divided into broad clinical categories and responses were recorded regarding the treatment of illness by the doctor and opinions regarding telemedicine. Most questions were in yes/no or a Likert-based questionnaire. Mean, median, percentage and proportions were used for statistical analysis of the data.

Results

The study group included 264 patients, with the majority with fractures and dislocations. Most patients (55.7%) were comfortable using the software for teleconsultation, and half the respondents found telemedicine convenient. A large percentage of the study group preferred in-person consultation to teleconsultation (58.7%), and the primary reasons for discontinuing teleconsultation were dissatisfaction during the interaction with the doctor and poor connectivity to telecommunication networks.

Conclusion

Telecommunication has high acceptance and satisfaction, but many factors limit its acceptance in developing countries.

Teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient and physician experiences

INTRODUCTION

The primary purpose of this review was to evaluate patient and physician preference and satisfaction for teleconsultation in orthopaedic surgery compared to traditional face-to-face consultation. In addition, we evaluated the effects of teleconsultation on patient length of visit, healthcare costs, range of motion (ROM), pain, quality of life (QOL), and ongoing management plans.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Randomised control trials and case control studies comparing teleconsultation with traditional, face-to-face consultation in the management of orthopaedic conditions were included. The primary outcome measures were patient and physician preference and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient length of visit, healthcare costs, ROM, pain, QOL, and ongoing management plans.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were included for systematic review and 8 for meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, length of visit, or time spent with the physician between the telemedicine and in-office control group. The mean difference of patient preference for telemedicine was significantly higher in the telemedicine group compared to the in-office visit group (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12-1.87, p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

Telemedicine was not inferior to face-to-face office visits in regard to patient and physician preference and satisfaction. Therefore, it would be an effective adjunct to face-to-face office visits, serving as a mechanism of triage and long-term continuity of care.

Orthopedic Telemedicine Outpatient Practice Diagnoses Set during the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown-Individual Observation

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a substantial intensification of the telemedicine transformation process in orthopedics since 2020. In the light of the legal regulations introduced in Poland, from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, physicians, including orthopedic surgeons, have had the opportunity to conduct specialist teleconsultations. Teleconsultations increase epidemiological safety and significantly reduce the exposure of patients and medical staff to direct transmission of the viral vector and the spread of infections. The study aimed to describe diagnoses and clinical aspects of consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations (TC) during the pandemic lockdown. The diagnoses were set according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Hybrid teleconsultations used smartphones and obligatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) with supplemental voice, SMS, MMS, Medical images, documents, and video conferencing if necessary. One hundred ninety-eight consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations were served for 615 women and 683 men (mean age 41.82 years ± 11.47 years). The most frequently diagnosed diseases were non-acute orthopedic disorders "M" (65.3%) and injuries "S" (26.3%). Back pain (M54) was the most frequent diagnosis (25.5%). Although virtual orthopedic consultation cannot replace an entire personal visit to a specialist orthopedic surgeon, in many cases, teleconsultation enables medical staff to continue to participate in providing medical services at a sufficiently high medical level to ensure patient and physician. The unified approach to TC diagnoses using ICD-10 or ICD-11 may improve further research on telemedicine-related orthopedics repeatability. Future research directions should address orthopedic teleconsultations' practical aspects and highlight legal, organizational, and technological issues with their implementations.

Abbreviated Outpatient Upper Extremity Fracture Care to Avoid Clinic and Hospital Environmental Encounters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A New Approach to Fracture Care?

BACKGROUND

To minimize in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, a new fracture care protocol for children with complete and stable, nondisplaced or minimally displaced upper extremity (UE) fractures has been implemented. This protocol involves immobilization with a bivalved cast, which allows for home cast removal during a telemedicine visit, and no follow-up radiographs, thus eliminating the requirement for a return to clinic. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and parent satisfaction of this new abbreviated fracture care protocol.

METHODS

Between May 2020 and April 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic, children with complete and stable, nondisplaced or minimally displaced UE fractures were treated with a bivalved cast and 1 follow-up telemedicine visit for home cast removal. A prospective longitudinal study of these patients was performed. The PROMIS Upper Extremity questionnaire was administered at enrollment and 3 months follow-up. Parents completed a satisfaction survey after home cast removal. Demographic data and information regarding complications were collected. A historical cohort of controls treated with standard cast in 2019 was used for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients with a mean age of 8±3 years (range 2 to 15) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Parent-reported PROMIS Upper Extremity scores showed a significant increase from 24.9 (95% confidence interval=20.8-29.1) at enrollment to 51.6 (95% confidence interval=50.8-52.5) at 3 months follow-up (P<0.001). Results of the satisfaction survey (n=39) showed all parents were either very satisfied (85%) or satisfied (15%). In addition, 10% of parents would have initially preferred to come into clinic for cast removal and 90% of parents would prefer this new treatment plan in the future. Patients in the abbreviated care cohort returned to clinic for a median 1 in-person visits, compared with 2 for historical controls (n=183, P<0.001). Abbreviated care patients received fewer (1.0) radiographs than controls (2.0, P<0.001). Complication rate did not differ between the groups (P=0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete and stable, nonminimally or minimally displaced UE fractures can be cared for safely and effectively in a single in-person visit, with a telemedicine cast removal visit. Parents are satisfied with this abbreviated protocol and prefer it to additional in-person visits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Video Teleconferencing for Disease Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment : A Rapid Review

BACKGROUND

Video teleconferencing (VTC) as a substitute for in-person health care or as an adjunct to usual care has increased in recent years.

PURPOSE

To assess the benefits and harms of VTC visits for disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment and to develop an evidence map describing gaps in the evidence.

DATA SOURCES

Systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2013 to 3 March 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Two investigators independently screened the literature and identified 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data abstraction by a single investigator was confirmed by a second investigator; 2 investigators independently rated risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Results from 20 RCTs rated low risk of bias or some concerns of bias show that the use of VTC for the treatment and management of specific diseases produces largely similar outcomes when used to replace or augment usual care. Nine of 12 studies where VTC was intended to replace usual care and 5 of 8 studies where VTC was intended to augment usual care found similar effects between the intervention and control groups. The remaining 6 included studies (3 intended to replace usual care and 3 intended to augment usual care) found 1 or more primary outcomes that favored the VTC group over the usual care group. Studies comparing VTC with usual care that did not involve in-person care were more likely to favor the VTC group. No studies evaluated the use of VTC for diagnosis or prevention of disease. Studies that reported harms found no differences between the intervention and control groups; however, many studies did not report harms. No studies evaluated the effect of VTC on health equity or disparities.

LIMITATIONS

Studies that focused on mental health, substance use disorders, maternal care, and weight management were excluded. Included studies were limited to RCTs with sample sizes of 50 patients or greater. Component analyses were not conducted in the studies.

CONCLUSION

Replacing or augmenting aspects of usual care with VTC generally results in similar clinical effectiveness, health care use, patient satisfaction, and quality of life as usual care for areas studied. However, included trials were limited to a handful of disease categories, with patients seeking care for a limited set of purposes.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Patient Satisfaction with Face-to-Face Follow-Up versus Telephone Follow-Up after Elective Day Case Hand Surgery

Background: There has been increasing amounts of work on the use of telephone follow-up (TFU) in trauma and orthopaedics, but little direct work on its use in the follow-up of elective day case hand surgery. The aim of this study is to compare patient satisfaction with face-to-face follow-up (FFU) and TFU after elective day case hand surgery. Methods: Sixty-four patients from an FFU and 61 patients from a TFU cohort were contacted by telephone at least 6 months after their last follow-up. A customized questionnaire with answers recorded on a Likert scale (0-10) was used to evaluate their satisfaction with the follow-up they received. Results: Data from 48 patients from the FFU and 52 patients from the TFU cohorts were available for the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics between the two cohorts. Patient satisfaction was significantly greater in all domains of the questionnaire in the TFU cohort. Most patients from both cohorts (71% face-to-face, 86% telephone) said they would prefer TFU if they were to have the same procedure again. Conclusions: Patients were more satisfied with TFU compared to FFU following elective day case hand surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Management of Gartland Type 1 Supracondylar Fractures: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Gartland Type 1 supracondylar humerus fractures are stable, non-displaced injuries treated with non-operative management. This systematic review was performed to gather evidence on the optimal form of immobilization to treat these fractures.

METHODS

The review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in November 2020. Articles were eligible if they included children less than 18 years old, with non-displaced supracondylar fractures, treated non-operatively. Randomized trials, quasi-experimental trials, and prospective cohort studies were included. Outcomes of interest included fracture displacement, pain control, time to return to normal activities, return of range of motion (ROM), child/parent satisfaction, adverse events, and cost. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, Rob-2, and the ROBINS tools.

RESULTS

After duplicate records were removed, 525 records were evaluated with 9 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and 5 reporting clinical outcomes. The studies were heterogenous, in intervention and outcomes, and all at moderate risk of bias. Within the available evidence there were no cases of fracture displacement. Two small studies suggested that cuff and collar treatment provided inadequate pain control and delay in return to normal activities, compared to posterior splints. Two randomized control trials (RCTs) suggested that soft fiberglass casts reduced appointment time and increased parent satisfaction, compared to traditional casts. No studies directly compared posterior splints to circumferential casts.

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient high-quality evidence to determine the optimal conservative treatment for patients with Gartland type 1 supracondylar fractures. Level of Evidence Level II systematic review of Level II studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020144616].

Telemedicine for pediatric orthopedic visits: evaluating usability and satisfaction

The purpose of this study is to evaluate usability and patient satisfaction with telemedicine in pediatric orthopedics using validated questionnaires and to identify demographic and clinical factors that may impact these ratings. All caregivers of patients who had telemedicine visits with a single fellowship-trained pediatric orthopedic surgeon between 23 March 2020 and 3 June 2020 were eligible to participate. Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good and 4 = excellent) were used. Additional information regarding the level of education, mode of transportation, technology usage, demographics, visit diagnosis and length of visit were collected. Quantitative analysis was performed. A total of 68.6% (83/121) of the visits were done via telemedicine. Around 46 surveys were completed with a response rate of 55.4% (46/83). The PSQ mean score was 3.63 ± 0.39 with non-English-speaking caregivers scoring lower compared to their English-speaking counterparts (3.4 ± 0.47 vs. 3.72 ± 0.33; P = 0.017). PSQ mean score increased with increasing length of visit (r = 0.352; P = 0.018). A total of 86.8% (839/966) of all TUQ's responses were good to excellent with 89.1% (41/46) of responders were satisfied with telemedicine and 91.3% (42/46) would use it again. Although the topic is an evolving one, and a lot of changes should be expected in the future, certain characteristics such as primary language and length of visit may affect the levels of satisfaction with the use of telemedicine in pediatric orthopedics. Knowledge regarding satisfaction ratings may allow orthopedic surgeons to improve patient care delivered through this technology. Level of Evidence: IV.

Assessing Orthopedic Patient Preferences for Mandated Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Elective Virtual Care in Non-Pandemic Circumstances

The purpose of this study was to compare orthopedic patient preferences for mandated virtual care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and elective virtual care during non-pandemic circumstances. An orthopedic virtual care questionnaire was administered to adult orthopedic patients undergoing their first orthopedic virtual visit between March 15, 2020, and May 18, 2020. The questionnaire had 13 items rated on a 1-to-5 Likert scale ("strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"). Responses were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Patients showed higher preferences for mandated virtual care during the pandemic when compared with elective virtual care during non-pandemic circumstances (2.25±1.31 vs 4.10±1.25, P<.0001) and also preferred virtual visits in other specialties compared with orthopedics (2.17±1.35 vs 2.79±1.42, P<.0001). Patients older than 50 years were more likely to view virtual care as the best option during the pandemic (2.06±1.25 vs 2.48±1.35, P<.0165) and equally as effective as in-person visits in non-pandemic circumstances (2.45±1.36 vs 2.83±1.18, P<.0150). Female patients were more likely to pursue future orthopedic virtual visits (2.61±1.37 vs 3.07±1.45, P<.0203) and view their virtual visit as equally effective as an in-person visit (2.47±1.33 vs 2.87±1.18, P<.0181). Orthopedic patient preference for mandated virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be higher than for elective virtual care during non-pandemic circumstances, and older and female patients appear to favor virtual care. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e471-e476.].

The Use of Telehealth for Orthopedic Consultations and Assessments: A Systematic Review

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, tele-health for orthopedic care is expanding rapidly. The authors sought to identify the evidence describing the effectiveness, barriers, and clinical applications of telehealth for orthopedic assessments and consultations. MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2020. Forty-seven studies were included, with the most common conditions evaluated being trauma related and the primary modality being videoconferencing. Available literature supports the use of telehealth for orthopedic consultations and assessments because it yields moderate-to-high patient and provider satisfaction, accurate examinations, cost-effectiveness, and reduced wait times. Most commonly reported concerns were professional liability, network security, and technical issues. Given the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid implementation and uptake of virtual assessment for patient care has occurred. The current evidence suggests that telehealth is capable of providing prompt access to quality, cost-efficient orthopedic consultations and assessments. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):198--206.].

Evaluating Patient Interest in Orthopedic Telehealth Services Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

Patient interest and demand may have an impact on dictating the scope of orthopedic telehealth utilization beyond the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess whether current interest in orthopedic telehealth services is higher than pre-pandemic levels. Specific trends in interest, subspecialty differences, and regional differences were secondarily assessed.

Methodology

A Google Trends search was performed to assess orthopedic telehealth search interest over the last five years using the terms “Orthopedic surgeon/doctor/injury/pain + Telehealth” as well as subspecialty-specific terms. The results were formulated into combined search interest values (CSIVs), with a maximum possible value of 400, and compared between the pre-pandemic period, pre-vaccine period during the pandemic, and post-vaccine period.

Results

The pre-pandemic period mean CSIV was 40.3 (SD = 6.3), compared to 134.7 (SD = 72.1) during the pre-vaccine period, and 96.3 (SD = 4.4) during the post-vaccine period (p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between CSIV and time (increasing weeks) during the pre-pandemic period (r_s = .77, p < 0.001) and no significant correlation between CSIV and time during the post-vaccine period (r_s = -.12, p = 0.610). Using the slope of the interest line during the post-vaccine period (y = 97.06 - 0.08x) it would take an additional 13.3 years beyond the study period to reach the mean pre-pandemic CSIV level of 40.3. Hand surgery was the subspecialty with the highest mean CSIV over the study period and general search interest was highest in Northeastern and Southeastern states during the post-vaccine period.

Conclusions

Orthopedic telehealth interest was growing before the COVID-19 pandemic and remains significantly elevated beyond pre-pandemic levels despite the reopening of clinical offices and vaccine availability across the country. It appears that a subset of patients will continue to seek telehealth services beyond the pandemic.

Telemedicine in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered transformative changes in how clinicians interact with patients. There has been a shift toward virtual consultations. The evidence to support this change in practice is unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence base for virtual consultations for orthopedics. Materials and Methods: Two independent reviewers performed a literature search based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. Only studies reporting outcomes following the use of telemedicine for diagnosis, consultation, rehabilitation, and follow-up were included. Outcomes analyzed were: (1) patient and clinician satisfaction, (2) clinical outcome measures, and (3) cost analysis of traditional versus teleconsultation. Results: A total of 41 studies were included. Fifteen studies compared clinical outcomes of telemedicine against a matched traditional cohort. Of these 15 studies, 2 demonstrated noninferiority, 9 showed no statistically significant difference, and 4 found telemedicine to be superior. Eleven studies recorded patient reported outcomes, which demonstrated high patient satisfaction. Nine studies reported decreased costs when telemedicine was compared to traditional care. The remaining six studies had varied aims and methodologies that didn't fit well with any of these subheadings. Discussion: While the available evidence is limited, the studies assessed here show that telemedicine can deliver high quality health care with good clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction in a cost-effective manner. Our team thinks what this has highlighted is that communication technology is advancing rapidly and that we as a community of surgeons need to be able to adapt rapidly and adopt innovative technology to continue to improve patient experience and outcomes.

Are Postcast Removal X-rays and a Second Follow-up Necessary in the Treatment of Nondisplaced Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND

The utility of routine follow-up radiographs for the treatment of nondisplaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures has not been established. The purpose of this study is to (1) determine the frequency that postcast removal x-rays change patient management and (2) determine the role of routine follow-up for range of motion evaluation after cast removal in the treatment of nondisplaced supracondylar humerus fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of patients under the age of 18 years old that sustained nondisplaced supracondylar humerus fractures between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, time to follow-up and each appointment outcome were recorded. A change in patient management after postcast removal x-ray was defined as a need for an additional period of immobilization, a delay in initiation of range of motion exercises, or need for operative intervention. In addition, the appointment for range of motion evaluation was considered to alter management if further activity restriction was required, a formal physical therapy program was recommended or an additional office visit required. Unscheduled appointments were also noted.

RESULTS

A total of 489 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 4.90±2.68 years and 51.8% were female. A total of 487 patients had routine follow-up x-rays after cast removal. No patient had a change of management based on postcast removal radiographs. In all, 290 patients returned for range of motion follow-up with 94.8% of patients being discharged from care. There were 14 patients whose management changed based on this evaluation (4.8%). The most common reason was an additional appointment for range of motion evaluation (12/14 patients, 86%). There were 13 patients with unscheduled evaluation after discharge from care, 77% were secondary to repeat injury.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that postcast removal x-rays and routine follow-up after cast removal rarely change patient management and may not be necessary in the treatment of nondisplaced pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Telehealth in an Orthopedic Sports Medicine Clinic: The First 100 Patients

Background: Orthopedic specialties have begun to embrace telehealth as an alternative to in-person visits. We have not found studies assessing telehealth in sports medicine. Our goal is to evaluate patient perception of telehealth in an orthopedic sports medicine practice. Methods: Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained. The first 100 patients 18 years and older who had their initial videoconference telehealth appointment with our sports medicine providers from March to April 2020 were contacted at the conclusion of their visit. Surveys assessed satisfaction with telehealth, the provider, and whether attire played a role in their perception of the quality of the telehealth visit. Results: Patients on average stated excellent satisfaction with their visit (4.76 out of 5) and their provider (4.98 out of 5). Patients slightly disagreed with the notion that telehealth is equivalent to in-person provider visits (2.95 out of 5). This did not affect their perception to telehealth itself. It did not discourage patients from recommending telehealth or their provider to future patients. Patients overall felt that attire of the provider does not influence their opinion as to the standard of care they received. Returning patients versus new patient visits were more likely to recommend telehealth to others (4.83 vs. 4.56, p = 0.04). The responses from both groups were overwhelmingly positive. Conclusion: Telehealth is a viable clinic option in an orthopedic sports medicine clinic. Patients who have seen providers in-person previously are more likely to recommend telehealth versus new patients. New patients were satisfied with their telehealth experience. Level of Evidence: IV.

How Satisfied Are Patients and Surgeons with Telemedicine in Orthopaedic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in a rapid pivot toward telemedicine owing to closure of in-person elective clinics and sustained efforts at physical distancing worldwide. Throughout this period, there has been revived enthusiasm for delivering and receiving orthopaedic care remotely. Unfortunately, rapidly published editorials and commentaries during the pandemic have not adequately conveyed findings of published randomized trials on this topic.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, we asked: (1) What are the levels of patient and surgeon satisfaction with the use of telemedicine as a tool for orthopaedic care delivery? (2) Are there differences in patient-reported outcomes between telemedicine visits and in-person visits? (3) What is the difference in time commitment between telemedicine and in-person visits?

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review with the primary objective to determine patient and surgeon satisfaction with telemedicine, and secondary objectives to determine differences in patient-reported outcomes and time commitment. We used combinations of search keywords and medical subject headings around the terms "telemedicine", "telehealth", and "virtual care" combined with "orthopaedic", "orthopaedic surgery" and "randomized." We searched three medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) in duplicate and performed manual searches to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the outcomes of telemedicine and in-person orthopaedic assessments. Trials that studied an intervention that was considered to be telemedicine (that is, any form of remote or virtual care including, but not limited to, video, telephone, or internet-based care), had a control group that comprised in-person assessments performed by orthopaedic surgeons, and were reports of Level I original evidence were included in this study. Studies evaluating physiotherapy or rehabilitation interventions were excluded. Data was extracted by two reviewers and quantitative and qualitive summaries of results were generated. Methodological quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, which uniformly rated the trials at high risk of bias within the blinding categories (blinding of providers, patients, and outcome assessors). We screened 133 published articles; 12 articles (representing eight randomized controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. There were 1008 patients randomized (511 to telemedicine groups and 497 to control groups). Subspecialties represented were hip and knee arthroplasty (two trials), upper extremity (two trials), pediatric trauma (one trial), adult trauma (one trial), and general orthopaedics (two trials).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the odds of satisfaction between patients receiving telemedicine care and those receiving in-person care (pooled odds ratio 0.89 [95% CI 0.40 to 1.99]; p = 0.79). There were also no differences in surgeon satisfaction (pooled OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.07 to 2.19]; p = 0.28) or among multiple patient-reported outcome measures that evaluated pain and function. Patients reported time savings, both when travel time was excluded (17 minutes shorter [95% CI 2 to 32]; p = 0.03) and when it was included (180 minutes shorter [95% CI 78 to 281]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from heterogeneous randomized studies demonstrates that the use of telemedicine for orthopaedic assessments does not result in identifiable differences in patient or surgeon satisfaction compared with in-person assessments. Importantly, the source studies in this review did not adequately capture or report safety endpoints, such as complications or missed diagnoses. Future studies must be adequately powered to detect these differences to ensure patient safety is not compromised with the use of telemedicine. Although telemedicine may lead to a similar patient experience, surgeons should maintain a low threshold for follow-up with in-person assessments whenever possible in the absence of further safety data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Feasibility of telemedicine in maintaining follow-up of orthopaedic patients and their satisfaction: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

The current COVID-19 pandemic has implications on the morbidities of orthopedic patients due to lack of routine follow-ups, and inpatient and outpatient-based interventions. Telemedicine has recently emerged as an alternative for healthcare delivery to the patients and providing them with important information about orthopedic self-care and medications that can be followed without a hospital visit. However, due to lack of physical assessment, telemedicine is bound to have some limitations as well. The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of proactive telemedicine in maintaining follow-up of orthopedic patients, and their satisfaction with telemedicine as an alternative mode of treatment delivery.

METHODS

This one-month cross-sectional study enrolled the follow-up patients that visited the orthopedic outpatient-department in February 2020. The patients were sequentially called according to the order of their registration, on a daily basis. Consenting patients were provided with telemedicine-based consultations, and those requiring physical evaluation were called for outpatient visits after documenting the valid reasons. The response-rates and the volume of patients requiring physical visits were measured for different diagnosis-based groups. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire that included overall patient satisfaction with telemedicine, its effectiveness, and ease in following the telemedicine-based treatment.

RESULTS

The response rate to telemedicine was 88.67%. Among the patients availing telemedicine, 71.43% were managed without needing physical visits to the outpatient-department. The need for physical examination and failed patient-doctor communication were the most common reasons for advising physical outpatient visits. The overall satisfaction-rate to telemedicine was 92%, and only 7.2% of patients had difficulty in understanding or following telemedicine-based advice.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine can effectively reduce the need for physical visits to outpatient-departments for follow up of orthopedic patients. The response-rate and overall patient-satisfaction rates to telemedicine are high. Further efforts in expanding the use of telemedicine and addressing its limitations, especially those related to the failed communications, are needed to develop it as an alternative to physical orthopedic consultations in the current situation.

Telemedicine in orthopaedics and its potential applications during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review

Introduction

Telemedicine is the delivery of healthcare across a distance using some form of communication technology. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased adoption of telemedicine with national orthopaedic governing bodies advocating its use, as evidence suggests that social distancing maybe necessary until 2022. This systematic review aims to explore evidence for telemedicine in orthopaedics to determine its advantages, validity, effectiveness and utilisation.

Methods

Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL were systematically searched and articles were included if they involved any form of telephone or video consultation in an orthopaedic population. Findings were synthesised into four themes: patient/clinician satisfaction, accuracy and validity of examination, safety and patient outcomes and cost effectiveness. Quality assessment was undertaken using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools.

Results

Twenty-one studies were included consisting of nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Studies revealed high patient satisfaction with telemedicine for convenience, less waiting and travelling time. Telemedicine was cost effective particularly if patients had to travel long distances, required hospital transport or time off work. No clinically significant differences were found in patient examination nor measurement of patient-reported outcome measures. Telemedicine was reported to be a safe method of consultation.

Discussion

Evidence suggests that telemedicine in orthopaedics can be safe, cost effective, valid in clinical assessment and with high patient/clinician satisfaction. However, more high-quality RCTs are required to elucidate long-term outcomes. This systematic review presents up-to-date evidence on the use of telemedicine and provides data for organisations considering its use during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Tele-orthopaedics: A systematic mapping study

INTRODUCTION

The use of telemedicine in orthopaedics can provide high-quality orthopaedic services to patients in remote areas. Tele-orthopaedics is widely acknowledged for decreasing travel, time and cost, increasing accessibility and quality of care. In the absence of a comprehensive review on tele-orthopaedics applications and services, here, we systematically identify and classify the tele-orthopaedic applications and services and provide an overview of the trends in the field.

METHODS

In this study, a systematic mapping was conducted to answer six research questions, we searched the databases Scopus, PubMed, IEEE Digital Library and Web of Science up to 2019. Consequently, 77 papers were screened and selected on the basis of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We found that mobile-based teleconsultation was mostly asynchronous, while non-mobile teleconsultation was synchronous. The results showed that the physician-patient relationship was more common than other interactions, such as physician-physician and physician-robot interactions. In addition, more than half of the services provided by tele-orthopaedics have been used for orthopaedic diseases/traumas in which joint replacement and fracture reduction have been the most important orthopaedic procedures. It has been noted that more attention has been paid to tele-orthopaedics in developed countries such as the USA, Australia, Canada and Finland.

DISCUSSION

Telemonitoring (teleconsultation and telemetry) and telesurgery (telerobotics and telementoring) were found to be the two major forms of tele-orthopaedics. Mobile phones were used asynchronously in most of the teleconsultations. The development of different applications may result in the use of multiple smartphones applications in real-time teleconsultation. The use of smartphones is expected to increase in the near future.