Importance of lowest instrumented vertebra on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with Lenke type 3C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 4-year follow-up

2D and 3D Classification Systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Clinical Implications and Technological Advances

Classification systems for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) play an important role in guiding both surgical planning and conservative treatments. Traditional 2D classification systems, such as the Lenke, King and Lehnert-Schroth classifications, have been widely used for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of scoliosis. However, with the growing understanding of the three-dimensional nature of scoliosis and advancements in 3D reconstruction technologies, 3D classification systems are gaining increasing attention. This paper reviews the current applications, advantages, and limitations of different 2D and 3D classification systems, focusing on their clinical significance in treatment planning. While 3D classification systems offer clear advantages in capturing the complexity of spinal deformities, their clinical implementation faces challenges such as high costs and technical complexity. Additionally, studies show that computer-assisted technologies, artificial intelligence can significantly improve the accuracy and consistency of classification systems, reducing human errors. The paper also explores the future directions of classification system development, emphasizing the potential of combining 2D and 3D technologies and the impact of these advancements on personalized scoliosis treatment.

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Long-Term Postoperative Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: MRI Evaluation 34-51 Years after Surgery and its Changes during Middle and Older Age for an Average of 6.9 Years

Introduction

This study aimed to identify factors associated with intervertebral disc degeneration (DD) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who reached middle and older age after surgery.

Methods

A total of 252 AIS patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery between 1968 and 1988 were included in this survey-based study. Patients with a mean follow-up period of 40.9 years were evaluated through lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiographic assessments, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). DD was evaluated using the Pfirrmann grading system. Various factors, such as surgical levels, sagittal alignment, and PROMs, were analyzed for their association with DD.

Results

Among the 21 participants who underwent both previous (conducted from 2014 to 2016) and latest surveys (conducted in 2022), the prevalence of DD increased from 66.7% in the previous survey to 76.9% in the latest survey. The overall Pfirrmann disc score significantly increased from 3.2 to 3.5. Sagittal alignment parameters, such as sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and pelvic tilt (PT), worsened over time. Scores in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire pain, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly worse in the latest survey than in the previous one. Comparison between patients with the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L4 or lower and L3 or higher revealed significantly higher disc scores and 100% prevalence of DD in the L4 or lower group. Factors associated with DD included LIV at L4 or lower, smaller LL, larger thoracolumbar kyphosis, and increased SVA, PI-LL, and PT.

Conclusions

This study suggests that maintaining the LIV at L3 or higher, achieving good sagittal alignment, and maintaining LL may help prevent long-term DD in AIS patients.

Lowest instrumented vertebrae in early onset scoliosis: is there a role for a more selective approach?

PURPOSE

This purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient and implant characteristics on LIV selection in ambulatory children with EOS and to assess the relationship between the touched vertebrae (TV), the last substantially touched vertebrae (LSTV), the stable vertebrae (SV), the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), and the LIV.

METHODS

A multicenter pediatric spine database was queried for patients ages 2-10 years treated by growth friendly instrumentation with at least 2-year follow up. The relationship between the LIV and preoperative spinal height, curve magnitude, and implant type were assessed. The relationships between the TV, LSTV, SV, SSV, and the LIV were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 281 patients met inclusion criteria. The LIV was at L3 or below in most patients with a lumbar LIV: L1 (9.2%), L2 (20.2%), L3 (40.9%), L4 (29.5%). Smaller T1 - T12 length was associated with more caudal LIV selection (p = 0.001). Larger curve magnitudes were similarly associated with more caudal LIV selection (p = < 0.0001). Implant type was not associated with LIV selection (p = 0.32) including MCGR actuator length (p = 0.829). The LIV was caudal to the TV in 78% of patients with a TV at L2 or above compared to only 17% of patients with a TV at L3 or below (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most EOS patients have an LIV of L3 or below and display TV-LIV and LSTV-LIV incongruence. These findings suggest that at the end of treatment, EOS patients rarely have the potential for selective thoracic fusion. Further work is necessary to assess the potential for a more selective approach to LIV selection in EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Incidence and risk factors of distal adjacent disc degeneration in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of disc degeneration in patients with surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and identify the associated risk factors.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases were searched. The outcomes of interest were the incidence of disc degeneration, SRS-22, and radiological risk factors. The lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was also evaluated. Fixed effects were used if there was no evidence of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis was conducted including nine studies with a total of 565 patients. The analysis revealed that the global incidence of intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with surgically treated AIS patients was 24.78% (95% CI 16.59-32.98%) 10 years after surgery, which significantly increased to 32.32% (95% CI 21.16-43.47% at an average of 13.8 years after surgery. Among patients with significant degenerative disc changes, the SRS-22 functional, self-image, and satisfaction domains showed significantly worse results (MD - 0.25, 95% CI - 0.44 to - 0.05; MD - 0.50, 95% CI - 0.75 to - 0.25; and MD - 0.34, 95% CI - 0.66 to - 0.03, respectively). Furthermore, instrumentation at or above the L3 level was associated with a lower incidence of intervertebral disc degeneration compared to instrumentation below the L3 level (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10-0.64). It was also found that the preoperative and final follow-up lumbar curve magnitudes (MD 8.11, 95% CI 3.82-12.41) as well as preoperative and final follow-up lumbar lordosis (MD 0.42, 95% CI - 3.81 to 4.65) were associated with adjacent disc degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the incidence of intervertebral disc degeneration significantly increased with long-term follow-up using fusion techniques, reaching up to 32% when patients were 28 years of age. Incomplete correction of deformity and fusion of levels below L3, were identified as negative prognostic factors. Furthermore, patients with disc degeneration showed worse functional outcomes.

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Outcomes of Selective/Nonselective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke 1C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients with a Minimum 4-year Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Both the selective thoracic fusion (STF) and nonselective thoracic fusion (NSTF) are treatments for Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). To date, the impacts of the two surgical strategies on patients' long-term quality of life remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the long-term effects of STF/NSTF on the quality of life in Lenke 1C AIS patients through a 4-10-year follow-up.

METHODS

From January 2011 to April 2018, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a retrospective single-center study of 75 surgical patients with Lenke 1C curves was performed (n = 75). They all underwent posterior fusion, and patients were divided into the selective thoracic fusion (STF) group (n = 42) and the nonselective thoracic fusion (NSTF) group (n = 33) based on their surgical approach. All participants received the survey of the visual analogue scale (VAS), SRS30, SF12, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scales. Patients' gender, age, body mass index (BMI), surgical approach (STF/NSTF), surgical segments (UIV and LIV), follow-up time, complications, preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up Cobb angles, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were collected, and analyzed through the Shapiro-Wilks test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, t-test, and χ2 test.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of the entire cohort was 73 ± 5.6 months. The lumbar Cobb angle in the STF group improved from 31.8 ± 6.5° to 11.5 ± 5.1° after the operation and 10.3 ± 6.9° at the last follow-up. The postoperative correction rate of the lumbar curve was 63.8%, which increased to 67.7% at the last follow-up. In the NSTF group, the lumbar Cobb angle improved from 34.3 ± 11.3° to 4.3 ± 3.7° after the operation, and was 5.1 ± 3.1° at the last follow-up. The postoperative correction rate of the lumbar curve was 87.4%, and 85.1% at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, the STF group had higher overall HRQOL scores than the NSTF group, and there were statistically differences between the different groups (STF/NSTF) in SRS-30-Mental health (p = 0.03), SRS-30-Satisfaction with management (p = 0.02), SRS-30-Pain (p = 0.03), ODI (p = 0.01), SF-12 PCS (p = 0.03), VAS back pain (p = 0.005) and VAS leg pain (p = 0.001). No statistically differences were found in SF12 MCS, SRS-30-Self-image/Appearance and SRS-30 Function/activity.

CONCLUSION

After 4-10 years of follow-up, we found that the STF group achieved satisfactory correction results, and compared with the NSTF group, their overall HRQOL scores were higher, especially in terms of pain and satisfaction, where the STF group shows a significant advantage.

Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis that affects children aged 10-18 years old, manifesting in a three-dimensional spinal deformity. This study aimed to explore outcome measures used in defining AIS treatment success. Particularly, analyzing the extent of qualitative and quantitative (radiographic and quality of life domains) measures to evaluate AIS and whether AIS treatment approaches (surgical, bracing and physiotherapy) influences outcomes used as proxies of treatment success.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were used to conduct a systematic scoping review with 654 search queries. 158 papers met the inclusion criteria and were screened for data extraction. Extractable variables included: study characteristics, study participant characteristics, type of study, type of intervention approach and outcome measures.

RESULTS

All 158 studies measured quantitative outcomes. 61.38% of papers used radiographic outcomes whilst 38.62% of papers used quantitative quality of life outcomes to evaluate treatment success. Irrespective of treatment intervention utilized, the type of quantitative outcome measure recorded were similar in proportion. Moreover, of the radiographic outcome measures, the subcategory Cobb angle was predominantly used across all intervention approaches. For quantitative quality of life measures, questionnaires investigating multiple domains such as SRS were primarily used as proxies of AIS treatment success across all intervention approaches.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that no articles employed qualitative measures of describing the psychosocial implications of AIS in defining treatment success. Although quantitative measures have merit in clinical diagnoses and management, there is increasing value in using qualitative methods such as thematic analysis in guiding clinicians to develop a biopsychosocial approach for patient care.

Surgical Level Selection in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Evidence-Based Approach

The selection of fusion levels in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis remains complex. The goals of surgery are to minimize the risk of future progression and optimize spinal balance while fusing the least number of levels necessary. Several classifications, rules, and algorithms exist to guide decision making, although these have previously not been easily referenced in a study. This review aims to provide an evidence-based approach of selecting fusion levels that balances the expert opinion of the authors with the current literature.

Comparison of Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterolateral Fusion Techniques in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLF + TLIF) and PLF only in terms of revision surgery rates and complications, as well as functional and radiological outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients (37 patients in the PLF + TLIF group and 34 patients in the PLF only group) who underwent surgery due to LSS between January 2013 and December 2016 were retrospectively investigated. Functional evaluation was performed by using the McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scales pre-and postoperatively. Radiological evaluation was made by examining adjacent vertebrae, posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) morphology, and sagittal balance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Postoperative MPQ, RMDQ, and ODI scores were significantly better in the PLF + TLIF group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively). The complication rate was significantly higher in the PLF only group (p = 0.026). In the PLF + TLIF group, postoperative functional scores showed significant improvement in terms of the instrumented segment and level of interbody fusion. Postoperative functional scores showed significant improvement in PLF + TLIF patients with no complications, no revision surgery, no postoperative MRI findings, and neutral sagittal balance compared to the preoperative functional scores (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PLF + TLIF is significantly superior in terms of functional scores and complications, despite the statistical similarity in terms of postoperative MRI findings and sagittal balance between the groups. Surgeons should prefer PLF + TLIF for the surgical treatment of LSS for better results.