Comparison of K-wire versus screw fixation after open reduction of transitional (Tillaux and triplane) distal tibia fractures

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Potential Complications of Triplane Ankle Fractures in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Triplane ankle fractures represent a complex fracture type in pediatric patients. These fractures can prove challenging due to the involvement of multiple fracture planes and variations in segment fragmentation. With increasing literature pertaining to the treatment of triplane fractures and the limitations of previous systematic reviews, the aim of this review is to summarize recent data on the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of pediatric triplane ankle fractures. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and searched five major databases up to July 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on observational studies and randomized controlled trials in pediatric triplane fractures. Case reports, cadaveric studies, and systematic reviews were excluded. Articles were screened and graded using the MINORS tool for quality assessment. Data were extracted on demographics, fracture types, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Results: A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria. The use of CT scans in combination with radiographs was common, and two-part fractures were the most frequently observed type. Surgical treatment, particularly open reduction with internal fixation, was preferred, while conservative surgical treatment remains under-reported. Complications were minimal, with limb length discrepancy being the most common. Conclusions: This review highlights the increased use of CT for diagnosing triplane fractures and the preference of certain surgical interventions. Conservative treatment approaches, though less studied, may offer alternatives in moderate cases. This review emphasizes the need for further research on conservative treatment outcomes, longer follow-ups, and randomized controlled trials to refine treatment strategies for this complex fracture pattern.

External fixator as a safe method in the treatment of distal tibial fractures in children

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional and radiological results of external fixator application in the treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures in children and to analyze differences between stable and unstable fractures.

METHODS

Medical records of children with distal tibial MDJ fracture confirmed by imaging from January 2015 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into stable and unstable groups and parameters, including clinical and imaging data and Tornetta ankle score were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-five children, comprising 13 with stable and 12 with unstable fractures, were included in our study. The mean age was 7 years (range, 2-13.1 years), and there were 17 males and 8 females. All children had closed reduction, and the basic clinical data of the two groups were comparable. Stable fractures showed shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy, operation, and fracture healing times than unstable fractures. No significant difference in Tornetta ankle score was observed. Twenty-two patients had excellent ankle score, and three had a good ankle score, for a combined incidence of 100%. Two patients in the stable fracture group and one in the unstable fracture group developed a pin site infection, and one patient with unstable fracture showed a length discrepancy (discrepancy<1 cm).

CONCLUSION

External fixator is safe and effective for the treatment of distal tibial MDJ fractures, whether the fracture is stable or not. It has the advantages of minimally invasive, excellent ankle function score, few major complications, needless auxiliary cast fixation, and early functional exercise and weight bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Are Prospective Criteria or Objective Clinical Measures Utilized in Return to Play (RTP) Decision Making After Ankle Surgery? A Scoping Review

Background

Manuscripts discussing return to play (RTP) following ankle surgery are common. However, the definition for RTP and the method by which it is determined remains unclear. The purpose of this scoping review was to clarify how RTP is defined following ankle surgery in physically active patients, to identify key factors informing RTP decision making (such as objective clinical measures), and make recommendations for future research.

Methods

A scoping literature review was performed in April 2021 using PubMed, EMBASE, and Nursing and Allied Health databases. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria: original research following ankle surgery reporting at least 1 objective clinical test and documentation of RTP. Data were extracted for study methods and outcomes (RTP definition, RTP outcomes, and objective clinical tests).

Results

The scoping review found studies on 5 ankle pathologies: Achilles tendon rupture, chronic lateral ankle instability, anterior ankle impingement, peroneal tendon dislocation, and ankle fracture. RTP criteria were not provided in the majority of studies (18/30 studies). In the studies that provided them, the RTP criteria were primarily based on time postsurgery (8/12) rather than validated criteria. Objective clinical outcome measures and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were documented for each surgery when available. Both clinical outcomes and PROMs were typically measured >1 year postsurgery.

Conclusion

In physically active patients who have had ankle surgery, RTP remains largely undefined and is not consistently based on prospective objective criteria nor PROMS. We recommend standardization of RTP terminology, adoption of prospective criteria for both clinical measures and PROMs to guide RTP decision making, and enhanced reporting of patient data at the time of RTP to develop normative values and determine when the decision to RTP is not safe.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, scoping review.