Radiologic, clinical, and functional evaluation of children with lateral humeral condyle fractures using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire

Comparison of biodegradable and metallic tension-band fixation for paediatric lateral condyle fracture of the elbow

INTRODUCTION

In our retrospective study we compared the outcomes of paediatric lateral condyle fractures of the elbow fixed by bioabsorbable pins and tension-band sutures or by metallic tension-band with K-wires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the data of children operated on for lateral condyle fractures between 2010 and 2020. Patients were classified as follows: 1. fractures treated with metallic (KW group), 2. fractures treated with resorbable implants (BR group). We compared the distribution of age, sex and fracture type in each group. Operative times of the two techniques were also recorded and compared. We analysed the X-rays taken one year after the injury and measured the following parameters: presence of possible non-union, varus or valgus deviation, lateral spur formation. Patients whose follow-up period was less than one year were excluded. For categorical data, group comparisons were performed with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the sample size. The evaluation of discrete variables was performed with Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

42 patients met the above criteria. We found 19 children in the Kirschner -wire + tansion band wire (KW) group and 23 in the Bioresorbable pin + tension band suture (BR) group. There were no significant differences between the study groups in terms of age, sex, left-right ratio, number of complications, operation time, number of Jacobs II and III cases or follow-up time. The operation time was on average 5 min longer in the bioresorbable group (K-wire mean = 62.1 min, Bioresorbable mean = 67 min), this difference, however, is not statistically significant (P = 0.177). In terms of minor and major complications, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. (P = 0.729).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not notice any difference between the complication rates of the two methods, so the real advantage of the absorbable implant technique is that no second intervention is necessary. The benefits of using biodegradable implants in various osteosynthesis techniques need further confirmation by randomised trials.

Arthroscopically assisted closed reduction for displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures over 4 mm in children

INTRODUCTION

Lateral humeral condyle fractures (LHCFs) are the most common intra-articular fracture occurring at the elbow in children. Conventional treatment for displaced pediatric LHCFs is open reduction and percutaneous pinning, and few studies have regarded the efficacy of arthroscopic-assisted techniques. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anatomic reduction via elbow arthroscopy for pediatric humeral lateral condyle fractures with displacements >4 mm.

METHODS

A total of 32 children with LHCFs featuring displacements >4 mm were enrolled in this retrospective study. Arthroscopically assisted reduction was performed as the primary treatment approach. For simple displaced fractures, arthroscopically assisted reduction was directly employed with intermittent intra-articular irrigation. For fractures with distal fragment rotation, the rotated fragments were firstly realigned into a simple displaced position under fluoroscopy before proceeding with arthroscopy. The success rate of arthroscopically assisted reduction and clinical outcomes at the latest follow-up were assessed, and complications related to the procedure were monitored.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 32 (90.62 %) enrolled cases were successfully treated with arthroscopically assisted reduction. Failure cases were attributed to soft tissue swelling, which hindered the manipulation of the fracture fragments for reduction or fixation. We subsequently adapted the surgical procedure, resulting in a significant increase in the success of arthroscopically assisted reduction, rising from 71.43 % to 96 %. Among the 29 successfully treated cases, excellent functional outcomes were observed in 18 cases, and 11 cases showed good outcomes. Regarding the carrying angle outcomes, 28 patients achieved excellent results, with one patient having a good outcome. The most frequent radiographic finding after surgery was lateral spur formation without further negative effects. Only one case of superficial infection occurred, promptly healing with topical management. No significant complications such as neurovascular injury or compartment syndrome were observed.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopically assisted anatomic reduction provides a promising alternative to open reduction for LHCFs with displacements exceeding 4 mm, offering direct visualization of the articular surface and minimizing soft tissue dissection.