Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures: A Conservative Approach to Stabilization

Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-dislocations and Their Variants: An Analysis of Outcomes and Complications Over a 10-year Period

OBJECTIVE

Monteggia fracture-dislocation variants have been well documented in adults, but most of the literature in the pediatric population is in the form of case reports. These injuries present differently in children due to the presence of immature radiocapitellar epiphyses and the flexibility of the joint that is more prone to subluxation, contributing to occult presentations and/or misdiagnoses. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes and complications of true Monteggia fracture-dislocations compared with their variants in the pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients 17 years of age and younger who sustained a true Monteggia fracture-dislocation or a Monteggia fracture-dislocation variant over a 10-year period. Patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, fracture pattern, Bado and Letts classification, treatment (operative or conservative), and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients identified, 17 (19.1%) had true Monteggia fracture dislocations, and 72 (80.9%) had a Monteggia fracture-dislocation variant. The most common Monteggia fracture-dislocation variant was an olecranon fracture and concomitant radial neck fracture (65.3%, n = 47). Of the Monteggia fracture-dislocation variants, 83.3% (n = 60) were treated nonoperatively with closed reduction and immobilization or immobilization alone, whereas only 23.5% (n = 4) of the true Monteggia fracture-dislocation injuries were treated nonoperatively with closed reduction and immobilization. Overall, 14 (15.7%) patients had complications during the course of treatment, including 12 (16.7%) Monteggia fracture-dislocation variants and 2 (11.8%) true Monteggia fracture-dislocations. The most common complications were loss of range of motion (n = 6, 42.9%, all of which were nondisplaced variants), loss of reduction (n = 4, 28.6%, including 2 nondisplaced variants, 1 displaced variant, and 1 true Monteggia fracture dislocation), and malunion or nonunion (n = 2, 14.3%, both nondisplaced variants).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocation variants are much more common than true pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations. Monteggia fracture-dislocation variants have similar complication rates to true Monteggia fracture-dislocations overall, however, nondisplaced variants exhibited a higher complication rate when treated operatively. Further studies are warranted to assess specific fracture patterns and their associated treatments that result in varying complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparison study.

Bado type III Monteggia fractures have a high injury- and treatment-related complication rate: a single center study of 73 fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Monteggia fractures can be problematic injuries. The aim of this population-based study is to evaluate the risk of complications according to the Bado types, clinical outcome, and incidence.

METHODS

 72 children (median age 6, range 2-11 years) with 73 Monteggia fractures treated during 2014-2022 were identified from the institutional fracture register. Timing of diagnosis, complications, and method of treatment were registered. Outcomes were assessed at mean 4 years (1-9) follow-up in 68 (94%) children. The census population (< 16 years old) in Helsinki metropolitan area during the study period was assessed.

RESULTS

Bado types I (n = 43) and III (n = 27) comprised all but 3 of the fractures. Diagnosis was made on admission in 57, and with a 1-8-day delay in 16 children. 8 children had sustained an associated nerve injury. 35 children were treated operatively, 7 after failed closed treatment. 4 reoperations were performed, including 3 ulnar osteotomies. The risk of complications (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-14) and closed treatment failures (OR 12.3, CI 1.3-118) was higher in Bado type III than in type I injuries. 60 children attended for clinical follow-up, all had congruent radio-humeral joints and full range of elbow and forearm motion. Mean PedsQL was 94 (72-100) and QuickDash 3 (0-13). 8 additional children reported normal elbow functions by phone. The calculated mean annual incidence of Monteggia injuries was 2.9/100,000 children.

CONCLUSION

 Monteggia fractures are rare (2.9/100,000 yearly). Bado type III injuries are associated with a high risk of complications.

[Monteggia lesions and equivalent lesions in children]

BACKGROUND

Missed Monteggia lesions results in chronic luxation and deficits in the range of motion. The overall therapeutic goal is a quick and stable anatomical repositioning of the lesion. The prognosis of Monteggia lesions in comparison to its equivalents is better, especially with early diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of the types of lesion, treatment modalities, hospitalization, immobilization, movement deficits, perioperative complications and outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 62 patients treated with acute Monteggia lesions and its equivalents during the period of 2009-2020.

RESULTS

2 patients were treated with cast immobilization only, 11 with repositioning under general anesthesia, 39 with intramedullary nailing and 10 with screw osteosynthesis. The average observation period was 4.1 months. Patients with cast immobilization needed only a short hospitalization (2 days), patients with repositioning or osteosynthesis had longer hospitalization (3.4 or 4.3 days, respectively). Deficits of the range of motion did not appear in simple cast immobilization or intramedullary nailing without reduction; however, patients with closed reduction or screw osteosynthesis showed some degree of deficits (9% and 40%, respectively). Monteggia lesions needed shorter hospitalization than their equivalents (3.7 vs. 4.5 days) and had less deficits in the range of motion (7% vs. 21%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients were treated with osteosynthesis (79%). Patients with Monteggia lesions had a better outcome than patients with equivalent lesions.

Exposed Intramedullary Fixation Produces Similar Outcomes to Buried Fixation for Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion.

RESULTS

Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients.

CONCLUSION

Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of the midterm result between locking plate and elastic intramedullary nail treating oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Acute Monteggia fracture (AMF) is defined as a fracture of the proximal ulna combined with a dislocation of the radial head, with less than 1 percent prevalence in pediatric patients with an elbow injury. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of two treatment methods for oblique ulnar fracture AMF Bado type I in children.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 28 children with oblique ulnar fracture acute Monteggia injury Bado I were included. Patients was divided into two groups: In the EIN group 16 patients were fixed with elastic intramedullary nail after reduction, and in the LCP group 12 patients were fixed with locking compression plate after reduction. Operation time and blood loss were recorded and the patients were assessed clinically by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of movement(ROM) and range of rotation(ROR).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were accessible for durable follow-up, with a mean age of 7.7 ± 1.3 years, follow up by 33.7 ± 5.1 months. The average operation time was 48.1 ± 9.2 min for the EIN group and 67.1 ± 7.2 min for the LCP group. The average blood loss was 8.2 ± 2.3 ml for the EIN group and 18.8 ± 3.8 ml for the LCP group. The average operation time and average blood loss in the EIN group are significant less than the LCP group. Mean MEPS, ROM, ROR in both group improved significantly before sugery to three months after surgery, and maintained very good results at last follow up. There is no significant difference between the EIN group and the LCP group in MEPS, ROM and ROR.

CONCLUSIONS

Oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients fixed by EIN and LCP can both get good mid-term results measured by MEPS, ROM and ROR, Fixed by EIN have shorter operation time and less blood loss than fixed by LCP.

A rare paediatric ‘floating elbow’; a supracondylar fracture with an ipsilateral Monteggia fracture: A case report

Introduction and importance

A paediatric floating elbow involves fractures of the supracondylar region of the humerus with ipsilateral fracture of the forearm bones. A floating elbow is very uncommon with an incidence of 3 to 13% of all supracondylar fractures. A concomitant supracondylar and Monteggia fracture is extremely rare with only six cases reported in the literature.

Case presentation

We present the unusual case of an eight-year-old girl with a concomitant ipsilateral supracondylar humerus fracture and open Monteggia fracture. Physical examination showed a neurovascularly intact limb. Surgical management was carried out in the form of closed and open reduction, percutaneous pinning using Kirschner (K) wires and Titanium Elastic Nails (TENs), and wound washout and debridement of the open lesion.

The patient developed pin site infection six weeks post operation and subsequently underwent surgery for removal of pins. She was later followed up with normal radiographic and physical examination findings.

Clinical discussion

The complexity of these fractures can lead to debilitating complications if proper management is not initiated. It is imperative that neurovascular and motor function be assessed in great detail and early surgical fixation be carried out in order to prevent these complications.

Conclusion

A paediatric floating elbow is a rare surgical emergency. Although no guidelines for the management of these fractures exist, we recommend surgical management in a step-by-step approach be used over conservative management. We also stress the importance of regular follow up to address any post operative complications that may arise such as the one in our case.

Closed reduction by trans-physealantegrade elastic stable intramedullary nailing in acute pediatric Monteggia fractures: a report of 22 cases

Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures is still debated. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of strategy based on closed reduction by trans-physeal antegrade elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of the ulnar fracture. Retrospective analysis of 22 patients (13 boys and nine girls) treated for acute Monteggia fractures between May 2008 and August 2018 was performed. Mean age at injury was 6.6 years. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years. On the basis of the Bado classification, 15 lesions were of type I, three types III and four types IV. All the patients were managed with closed reduction and ESIN of the ulna fracture within 2-19 h of arrival. Intraoperative stability of reduction of the radial head was checked under fluoroscopic control in pronation and supination. Outcomes were assessed with the Bruce et al. scoring system. Closed alignment of the ulnar fracture by ESIN had simultaneously reduced and stabilized the radial head dislocation in all patients. At the final follow-up, all the patients had excellent results. Complete healing of the fracture occurred in 6 weeks and the elastic nail removed at 3-6 months postoperatively. There was no case of instability or subluxation or re-dislocation of the radial head. No olecranon epiphysiodesis or growth disorders were noticed. Early diagnosis and management of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures by closed reduction and ESIN achieve excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Management of acute length-unstable Monteggia fractures in children: A case report

BACKGROUND

Monteggia fractures are uncommon injuries in paediatric age. Treatment algorithms assert that length-unstable fractures are treated with plate fixation. In this case report, intramedullary fixation of an acute length-unstable Monteggia fracture allowed a stable reduction to be achieved, along with an appropriate ulnar length and alignment as well as radio capitellar reduction despite the fact that the orthopaedic surgeon did not use a plate for the ulnar fracture. The scope of treatment is to avoid the use of a plate that causes periosteal stripping and blood circulation disruption around the fracture.

CASE SUMMARY

A four-year-old girl presented at the Emergency Department following an accidental fall off a chair onto the right forearm. The X-ray highlighted a length-unstable acute Bado type 1 Monteggia fracture of the right forearm. On the same day, the patient underwent surgical treatment of the Monteggia fracture. The surgeon preferred not to use a plate to avoid a delay in fracture healing and to allow the micromotion necessary for callus formation. The operation comprised percutaneous fixation with an elastic intramedullary K-wire of the ulnar fracture and, subsequently, humeroradial joint reduction through manual manipulation. The orthopaedic surgeon assessed the stability of the radial head reduction under fluoroscopic control through flexion, extension, pronation and supination of the forearm. Healing of the fracture occurred within six weeks after surgery, as indicated by the presence of calluses on at least three cortices on standard radiographs. Dislocation/subluxation or loss of ulnar reduction was not apparent at the final X-ray examination.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary fixation of unstable Monteggia fractures results in excellent outcomes, provides reliable reduction and causes fewer complications.

Surgical Treatment With Titanium Elastic Nail (TEN) for Failed Conservative Treatment of Acute Monteggia Lesions in Children

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the results of intramedullary osteosynthesis with titanium elastic nail (TEN) in the surgical treatment of Monteggia lesions in children aged 12 and under.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery with the TEN method between 2013 and 2019 were screened retrospectively. The inclusion criteria were patients who failed conservative treatment, a history of acute trauma (<14 d after injury), age 12 years and under, patients who underwent intramedullary osteosynthesis with TEN when surgical treatment is required, a follow-up period of over 12 months, absence of congenital upper extremity and bone anomalies, and no history of trauma to the ipsilateral elbow. For functional classification, the Grace and Eversmann Criteria were used to evaluate union, pronation, and supination, while the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to assess overall elbow function and limitations.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (26 male/12 female) were included in the study. The median age was 8.0 (6 to 10) years old and follow-up period was 26.0 (16 to 39) months. The mean value of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 97.1, 32 cases were excellent and 6 cases had good results. While the average age was 9.4 years in patients with mobility limitations, it was 7.1 years in patients without mobility limitations. Statistically, less movement restriction was observed in patients of younger age.

CONCLUSION

Length unstable ulnar fracture pattern for Monteggia lesions and those with secondary loss of reduction, intramedullary stabilization of the ulna fracture with TEN helps to achieve good functional and radiologic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Intramedullary Ulnar Fixation for the Treatment of Monteggia Fracture

Background

Although many pediatric Monteggia fractures can be treated nonoperatively, the presence of any residual radiocapitellar subluxation following ulnar reduction mandates a more aggressive approach to restore and maintain ulnar length. In younger children, restoration and maintenance of ulna length may be achieved through intramedullary fixation of the ulnar shaft.

Description

A Steinmann pin or flexible intramedullary nail is introduced percutaneously through the olecranon apophysis and advanced within the medullary canal to the ulnar fracture site. If necessary, the ulnar length and alignment are then restored by either a closed reduction or open reduction. The pin or nail is advanced across the fracture site into the distal fracture fragment and then advanced to a point just proximal to the distal ulnar physis. Once restoration of normal radiocapitellar alignment is verified fluoroscopically, the pin is bent and cut outside of the skin and a cast or splint is applied.

Alternatives

Closed reduction and cast immobilization is a well-accepted form of treatment for a Monteggia fracture. If ulnar length and alignment along with an anatomic reduction of the radiocapitellar joint can be achieved in this fashion, surgery can be avoided, but close radiographic follow-up is recommended to assess for loss of alignment with subsequent radial-head subluxation. Open reduction and internal fixation with use of a plate-and-screw construct can achieve similar results to intramedullary fixation and should be considered for length-unstable fractures and those in which an appropriately sized intramedullary implant fails to maintain adequate ulnar alignment. If plastic deformation of the ulna is present with residual radiocapitellar subluxation following reduction of the ulnar diaphysis, consideration should be given to elongating the ulna through the fracture site with use of plate fixation in order to allow reduction of the radial head.

Rationale

Intramedullary fixation provides several benefits over open reduction and plate fixation for these injuries. In general, treatment can be rendered with a shorter anesthetic time, less scarring, and without the concern for symptomatic retained hardware associated with plating along the subcutaneous boarder of the ulna shaft.

Expected Outcomes

Compared with nonoperative treatment, intramedullary fixation of length-stable Monteggia fractures has lower rates of recurrent radial-head subluxation and loss of ulnar alignment requiring subsequent operative treatment¹. If healing is achieved without residual radiocapitellar instability, good elbow function can be expected.

Important Tips

The entry point for the intramedullary implant should be slightly radial to the tip of the olecranon apophysis to compensate for the anatomic varus bow of the proximal aspect of the ulna.Intramedullary fixation is ideal for length-stable ulnar fractures. If a comminuted or long oblique fracture is present, an intramedullary device may not maintain ulnar length, leading to residual or recurrent radiocapitellar instability. For length-unstable fractures, therefore, a plate-and-screw construct should be considered.No more than 3 attempts should be made to pass the intramedullary implant into the distal ulnar segment by closed means in order to limit the risk of iatrogenic compartment syndrome.If anatomic alignment of the radiocapitellar joint is not achieved following an apparent anatomic reduction of the ulna, assess for plastic deformation of the ulna and consider open elongation of the ulna through the fracture site with use of plate fixation.Following fixation and radial-head reduction, immobilize the forearm in the position of maximal radiocapitellar stability (typically in supination).

Management of Monteggia Injuries in the Pediatric Patient

Monteggia fracture-dislocations in the pediatric population have unique patterns of injury that require distinct considerations in diagnosis and management. When appropriately diagnosed and treated early, acute pediatric Monteggia injuries have favorable outcomes. Missed or inadequately treated injuries result in chronic Monteggia lesions that require more complex surgical reconstructions and are associated with less predictable outcomes. This article reviews the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of acute and chronic pediatric Monteggia injuries as well as the controversies there in.

Biomechanical analysis of simultaneous distal and proximal radio-ulnar joint instability

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous dislocation of the proximal and distal radio-ulnar joints without bony injuries has been reported, but the mechanism remains unclear. We investigated concurrent proximal and distal radio-ulnar joint instability after sequential sectioning of the annular ligament, triangular fibrocartilage complex, and quadrate ligament.

METHODS

We performed this biomechanical study with six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. Proximal and distal radio-ulnar joint displacement was measured using an electromagnetic tracking device during passive mobility testing with anterior, lateral, and posterior loads on the radial head with pronation, supination, and neutral rotation. Measurements were statistically analyzed using the generalized linear mixed model.

FINDINGS

Proximal radio-ulnar joint instability was significantly greater after sectioning of the annular (lateral: 1.4%, P < .05; posterior: 0.7%, P < .05) and quadrate (lateral: 43.7%, P < .05; posterior: 29.5%, P < .05) ligament. Distal radio-ulnar joint instability was significantly greater in every sequential stage (final stage: anterior: 24.1%, P < .05; lateral 21.0%, P < .05; posterior: 31.3%, P < .05). Finally, significant simultaneous instability of the joints was observed after sectioning of the annular ligament, triangular fibrocartilage complex, and quadrate ligament, and neutral rotation potentially induced gross instability.

INTERPRETATION

Our ligament injury model induced simultaneous proximal and distal radio-ulnar joint instability without bony or interosseous membrane injury, probably induced by severe soft tissue injury. Proximal radio-ulnar joint instability may influence distal radio-ulnar joint instability from pivoting of the interosseous membrane. Our findings will help surgeons evaluate the magnitude of soft tissue injury and plan surgery for patients with simultaneous proximal and distal radio-ulnar joint instability.

Monteggia lesion and its equivalents in children

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to evaluate our group of paediatric patients with Monteggia lesion and its equivalents and to compare the characteristics of basic types of these lesions concerning therapeutic approach and results of the treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 111 children treated in the Department of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery of the Thomayer Hospital in Prague between 2001 and 2013 (13 years). When evaluating the outcome of the therapy, Bruce's criteria modified by Letts that assesses range of movement, pain and deformity of the elbow joint were applied. Regarding the therapeutic approach, four groups were compared: nonoperative treatment, reduction and casting, closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) and opened reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Results were compared between three groups of patients (Monteggia lesions, displaced equivalents and non-displaced equivalents) using Fisher´s exact test with α set to 0.05.

RESULTS

In all, 46 patients were treated for (true) Monteggia lesion, 27 for non-displaced Monteggia equivalent and 38 for displaced equivalent. There is a statistically significant difference in therapeutic approach between all three groups of patients. There is no significant difference in outcome between Monteggia lesions and both types of Monteggia equivalents, but there is a statistically significant difference between displaced and non-displaced equivalents.

CONCLUSION

There are only two lesions that meet the criteria of Monteggia - (true) Monteggia lesion and displaced Monteggia equivalent. The non-displaced equivalent does not meet the criteria of Monteggia and, therefore, should not be termed a Monteggia equivalent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III - Retrospective comparative study.

Effect of soft tissue injury and ulnar angulation on radial head instability in a Bado type I Monteggia fracture model

The effects of soft tissue damage and ulnar angulation deformity on radial head instability in Monteggia fractures are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that radial head instability correlates with the magnitude of ulnar angular deformity and the degree of proximal forearm soft tissue injury in Bado type I Monteggia fractures.We performed a biomechanical study in 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. Monteggia fractures were simulated by anterior ulnar angulation osteotomy and sequential sectioning of ligamentous structures. We measured radial head displacement during passive mobility testing in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation using an electromagnetic tracking device. Measurements at various ligament sectioning stages and ulnar angulation substages were statistically compared with those in the intact elbow.Radial head displacement increased with sequential ligament sectioning and increased proportionally with the degree of anterior ulnar angulation. Annular ligament sectioning resulted in a significant increase in displacement only in pronation (P < .05). When the anterior ulnar deformity was reproduced, the radial head displaced least in supination. The addition of proximal interosseous membrane sectioning significantly increased the radial head displacement in supination (P < .05), regardless of the degree of anterior ulnar angulation.Our Monteggia fracture model showed that radial head instability is influenced by the degree of soft tissue damage and ulnar angulation. Annular ligament injury combined with a minimal (5°) ulnar deformity may cause elbow instability, especially in pronation. The proximal interosseous membrane contributes to radial head stability in supination, regardless of ulnar angulation, and proximal interosseous membrane injury led to significant radial head instability in supination.

Comparison of treatment methods for pediatric Monteggia fracture: Met vs missed radial head dislocation

Various methods are applied in the treatment of fresh and neglected Monteggia fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment methods, and assess the complexity associated with missed radial head dislocation.All fracture patients were reviewed between Jan 2012 and Dec 2016. A detailed comparison was made of the treatment methods between fresh Monteggia fractures and neglected Monteggia fractures with missed diagnosis of dislocation.A preliminary analysis of clinical information from 1081 patients in our center was investigated, and 42 were included in the final analysis. The fresh group included 25 patients with an average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 96.3 ± 2.7 and resulted in the following scores after treatment: 21 excellent, 3 good, and 1 fair. In the fresh group, 76% of patients received closed reduction. Treatment with a cast, elastic stable intramedullary nail, and the Kirschner wire stabilization with tension band wiring make up 80% of the choices for fixation treatment. No patients experienced associated vascular injuries, recurrent dislocation, or elbow dysfunction. The neglected group involved 17 patients with Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 92.1 ± 9.3 and resulted in the following scores after treatment: 10 excellent, 4 good, and 3 fair. The locking compression plate (LCP) was the most common choice for postoperative immobilization in the neglected group (88.2%). Three patients in the neglected group experienced recurrent dislocation.This retrospective analysis indicates that the treatment of neglected Monteggia fractures is more complex than that of fresh Monteggia fractures, and usually results in a worse recovery rate with a higher rate of recurrent dislocation and elbow dysfunction.