Three-dimensional MRI Analysis of Femoral Head Remodeling After Reduction in Patients With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Assessment and quantitative analysis of hip surrounding muscles in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip via magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The muscles that encase the hip serve a crucial role in both joint stability and functional efficacy, and as developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) progresses, the surrounding musculature may undergo specific adaptations that reduce joint stability, thereby exacerbating dislocation. Yet, the exact nature of changes in muscle morphology and quality remains inadequately investigated. This study aimed to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations of the iliopsoas and other hip flexor and extensor muscles in children with unilateral DDH before and after treatment.

METHODS

Children with unilateral DDH were included in this study and compared to a matched control group. Using T2-weighted MRI sequences, muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat infiltration (FI) were measured for the iliopsoas, sartorius, rectus femoris, tensor fasciae latae, and gluteus maximus. The cross-sectional area ratio (CSAr) was calculated as the CSA of the affected side divided by the CSA of the healthy side, corresponding to the respective sides in normal controls. For long-term follow-up (≥ 5 years), data from DDH children were analyzed, categorized into groups based on treatment. Comparisons of muscle CSAr and FI at the final follow-up were made against preoperative levels.

RESULTS

Preoperative median CSAr values for the iliopsoas, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus in DDH children were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001). FI levels were also higher in the DDH group compared to controls. In the closed reduction group, iliopsoas CSAr increased and FI decreased at the final follow-up compared to preoperative measurements. Conversely, in the open reduction group, iliopsoas CSAr and FI decreased. In the Dega osteotomy group, both iliopsoas CSAr and FI decreased, while CSAr for the sartorius, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus increased, with also reduced FI.

CONCLUSION

Children with DDH exhibit varying degrees of muscle atrophy and increased fat infiltration compared to their age-matched healthy counterparts. Aside from the iliopsoas, muscle morphology and fat infiltration in DDH children improved post-treatment compared to pre-treatment levels.

Femoral Head Remodeling After Surgical Reduction of Developmental Hip Dislocations

OBJECTIVE

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is prevalent and is associated with dysplasia of both the femoral head and acetabulum. There is a paucity of literature describing femoral head remodeling after surgical reduction of developmentally dislocated hips. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify changes in femoral head sphericity after closed or open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with typical developmental hip dislocations who underwent closed or open reduction from 2009 to 2022 at a single institution and had immediate postoperative and average 3-week follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. A subset of patients also had 3-year follow-up MRI scans. Patients with insufficient imaging or bony procedures at the time of reduction were excluded. We developed a technique to quantify femoral head "sphericity" by comparing differences in measured radii of the femoral head on axial and coronal plane MRI slices. We then calculated the variance of the radii for each plane and averaged these to calculate a combined variance. The variance was used to represent "sphericity," with a larger variance indicating a wider distribution of radii and thus a less spherical shape.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients (69 females) with 96 hips were included in this series. The median age of the child at the time of reduction was 8.7 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2.2]. Over half (58.3%) of the hips had a closed reduction, whereas the remaining were open reduced (41.7%). Immediately postoperatively, at the 3-week time point, and at the 3-year time point the median combined variance was 1.1 (IQR: 3.93), 0.51 (IQR: 1.32), and 0.31 (IQR: 0.50), respectively, indicating improved sphericity over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Sphericity of the femoral head in developmental hip dislocations improves in both the immediate postoperative period, as well as the first few years after reduction. Further research is needed to evaluate the mechanism of remodeling, the ideal timing of reduction, and the relationship between femoral head and acetabular remodeling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series, therapeutic study.

Effect of hip dysplasia on the development of the femoral head growth plate

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to observe whether developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) affects the development of the femoral head growth plate and to analyze the risk factors.

Methods

We selected female patients aged between 11 and 20 years with unilateral DDH and unclosed femoral head growth plate (s). The selected patients underwent anteroposterior radiography of the hip joint to compare the degree of development of the femoral head growth plate on both sides and to identify risk factors that affect the development of the growth plate in the femoral head.

Results

We included 48 female patients with unilateral DDH, with an average age of 14 years (range: 11.1-18.5 years) and an average BMI of 20.4 kg/m² (range: 15.5 kg/m²-27.9 kg/m²). Among them, 23 patients had earlier development of the femoral head growth plate on the affected side than on the healthy side, while the degree of development of the femoral head growth plate in 25 patients was the same as that on the contralateral side. When the Tönnis angle was greater than 29.5°C and/or the Reimers migration index was greater than 48.5%, there was a statistically significant difference in the acceleration of femoral head growth plate development.

Conclusion

An abnormal relative position of the acetabulum-femoral head caused by DDH can accelerate closure of the femoral head growth plate in immature female patients. The risk factors are a Tönnis angle greater than 29.5°C and/or Reimers migration index greater than 48.5%.

Evaluation of Anterior Coverage in Children With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Using Transverse Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 2 Years Is Predictive of Future Radiographic Coverage

BACKGROUND

Although normal anterior acetabular coverage provides stability to the hip, acetabular retroversion leads to femoroacetabular impingement related to hip osteoarthritis. Previous studies have focused on acetabular version and anteroposterior coverage in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); however, the correlation between anteroposterior coverage and acetabular development is unclear. We measured anteroposterior acetabular coverage in DDH patients using transverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent bony acetabular growth, and evaluated the correlation of those findings.

METHODS

We evaluated 37 DDH (dislocations) in 36 patients who underwent MRI at 2 years of age. The mean age was 2.2±0.3 years at the time of MRI (1.6±0.4 y after reduction) and 6.0±0.1 years at the time of plain radiography for the Severin classification. On MRI scans, we measured the cartilaginous center-edge angle (CCEA) and cartilaginous acetabular-head index (CAHI) in the coronal plane and the anterior and posterior cartilaginous center-edge angles (AC-CEA and PC-CEA, respectively) in the transverse plane. Severin I or II was defined as a good outcome and III or IV as a poor outcome.

RESULTS

In the evaluations conducted at 2 years of age, the mean CCEA, CAHI, AC-CEA, and PC-CEA were 14±9 degrees, 66%±10%, 39±8 degrees, and 77±7 degrees, respectively; the CEA at 6 years of age was 13±7 degrees. Twelve and 25 hips were classified in the good and poor outcome groups, respectively. Although CCEA, CAHI, and AC-CEA were significantly associated with the outcome in a single regression analysis ( P <0.05), only AC-CEA was significant in the multiple regression analysis with a stepwise selection method ( P =0.018). The cutoff AC-CEA value for a good outcome was 38 degrees (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 68%) using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Among MRI findings for acetabular cartilaginous morphology, AC-CEA was strongly associated with the outcome. Anteroposterior coverage was correlated with bony acetabular growth in childhood, and anterior coverage was particularly important for subsequent acetabular growth.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

Three-dimensional curvature mismatch of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius is increased in borderline dysplastic hips

Whether borderline hip dysplasia is pathologic remains unclear. In order to evaluate the three-dimensional joint congruity, this study sought to answer the question: are borderline dysplastic hip curvature mismatch and eccentricity between the acetabulum and the femoral head different from dysplastic or control hips three-dimensionally? The 113 hips, categorized as: dysplastic (LCEA ≤ 20°), 47 hips; borderline (20° ≤ LCEA < 25°), 32 hips; and control (25° ≤ LCEA < 35°), 34 hips; were evaluated. Three-dimensional (3D) femoral and coxal bone models were reconstructed from CT images. Using a custom-written Visual C++ routine, the femoral head and acetabular radii of curvature, and the femoral head and the acetabular curvature center were calculated. Then the ratio of the acetabular radius to the femoral head radius (3D curvature mismatch ratio), and the distance between the acetabular curvature center and the femoral head center (3D center discrepancy distance) were calculated. These indices were compared statistically among the three groups using Tukey's post hoc test. The mean 3D curvature mismatch ratio in the borderline (1.13 ± 0.05) was smaller than in the dysplasia (1.23 ± 0.08, p < 0.001), and larger than in the control (1.07 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). The mean 3D center discrepancy distance in the borderline (3.2 ± 1.4 mm) was smaller than in the dysplasia (4.8 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) and larger than in the control (1.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). These results demonstrated that three-dimensional congruity of the borderline dysplastic hip is impaired, but its incongruity is not as severe as in dysplastic hips. The 3D curvature mismatch ratio and the 3D center discrepancy distance can be valuable signs of joint congruity in patients with borderline dysplasia. However, future studies are necessary to clarify any associations between curvature mismatch and pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in borderline dysplasia.