"Next Day" Examination Reduces Radiation Exposure in Cervical Spine Clearance at a Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center: Preliminary Findings

Cervical spine clearance in the pediatric trauma population: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of the pediatric cervical spine after blunt trauma is an important topic that requires special consideration. In this article, we will review background information and differences between the pediatric and adult cervical spine. We will then give up-to-date guidance on best practice for screening and clearance of the cervical spine in children, including the advantages and disadvantages of different imaging techniques. Finally, we will introduce current topics of study and surmise what changes or innovations may be coming in the future.

Pediatric Cervical Spine Trauma: Injury Patterns, Diagnosis, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injuries to the cervical spine or spinal cord are uncommon pathologies in the pediatric population. As injury severity is disproportionately higher among children due to significant risk for debilitating long-term disability, traumatic spinal fractures in children raise greater clinical concern than comparable injuries in adults.

SUMMARY

Unlike adults, children possess unique features such as incomplete ossification of vertebrae, synchondroses, pseudo-subluxation, horizontal alignment of ligaments, and absence of lordosis, which results in greater mobility and flexibility in the pediatric spine. These features are prominent in the cervical spine, which accounts for the most common area of traumatic spinal injuries in children.

KEY MESSAGES

In this review, we summarize injury patterns, diagnosis, and treatment of traumatic cervical spine injuries in the pediatric population.

Trends and variation in cervical spine imaging utilization across children's hospitals for pediatric trauma

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation is a critical component in trauma evaluation, and although several pediatric c-spine evaluation algorithms have been developed, none have been widely implemented. Here, we assess rates of c-spine imaging use across children's hospitals, specifically temporal trends in imaging use, variation across hospitals in imaging used, and timing of magnetic resonance imaging in admitted patients.

METHODS

Data from the Children's Hospital Associations Pediatric Health Information System were abstracted from 2015 to 2020. Patients younger than 18 years seen in the emergency department with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision , code indicative of trauma and c-spine plain radiograph or computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department were included. Data visualization and descriptive statistics were used to assess rates of imaging use by age, year, hospital, injury severity, and day of service. Changes in rates of imaging use over time were evaluated via simple linear regression.

RESULTS

Across 25,238 patient encounters at 35 children's hospitals, there was an increase in use of c-spine CT from 2015 to 2020 (28.5-36.5%). There was substantial interinstitutional variation in rates of use of plain radiographs versus CT for initial evaluation of the c-spine across all age groups. Magnetic resonance imaging was obtained more than 3 days after admission in 31.5% of intensive care patients who received this imaging.

CONCLUSION

Increasing use of CT, substantial interinstitutional variation in rates of use of plain radiographs versus CT, and heterogenous timing of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of the pediatric c-spine demonstrate the growing need for development and implementation of an age-specific c-spine evaluation algorithm to guide judicious use of diagnostic resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Paediatric cervical spine injury (CSI) after blunt trauma is rare but can have severe consequences. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) have been developed to guide clinical decision-making, minimise unnecessary tests and associated risks, whilst detecting all significant CSIs. Several validated CDRs are used to guide imaging decision-making in adults following blunt trauma and clinical criteria have been proposed as possible paediatric-specific CDRs. Little information is known about their accuracy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of CDRs or sets of clinical criteria, alone or in comparison with each other, for the evaluation of CSI following blunt trauma in children.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and six other databases from 1 January 2015 to 13 December 2022. As we expanded the index test eligibility for this review update, we searched the excluded studies from the previous version of the review for eligibility. We contacted field experts to identify ongoing studies and studies potentially missed by the search. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional or cohort designs (retrospective and prospective) and randomised controlled trials that compared the diagnostic accuracy of any CDR or clinical criteria compared with a reference standard for the evaluation of paediatric CSI following blunt trauma. We included studies evaluating one CDR or comparing two or more CDRs (directly and indirectly). We considered X-ray, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine, and clinical clearance/follow-up as adequate reference standards.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, and carried out eligibility, data extraction and quality assessment. A third review author arbitrated. We extracted data on study design, participant characteristics, inclusion/exclusion criteria, index test, target condition, reference standard and data (diagnostic two-by-two tables) and calculated and plotted sensitivity and specificity on forest plots for visual examination of variation in test accuracy. We assessed methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Version 2 tool. We graded the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies with 21,379 enrolled participants, published between 2001 and 2021. Prevalence of CSI ranged from 0.5% to 1.85%. Seven CDRs were evaluated. Three studies reported on direct comparisons of CDRs. One study (973 participants) directly compared the accuracy of three index tests with the sensitivities of NEXUS, Canadian C-Spine Rule and the PECARN retrospective criteria being 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 1.00), 1.00 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.00) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.00), respectively. The specificities were 0.56 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.59), 0.52 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.55) and 0.32 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.35), respectively (moderate-certainty evidence). One study (4091 participants) compared the accuracy of the PECARN retrospective criteria with the Leonard de novo model; the sensitivities were 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.96) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.97), respectively. The specificities were 0.46 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.47) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.52) (moderate- and low-certainty evidence, respectively). One study (270 participants) compared the accuracy of two NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) head injury guidelines; the sensitivity of the CG56 guideline was 1.00 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.00) compared to 1.00 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.00) with the CG176 guideline. The specificities were 0.46 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.52) and 0.07 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.11), respectively (very low-certainty evidence). Two additional studies were indirect comparison studies. One study (3065 participants) tested the accuracy of the NEXUS criteria; the sensitivity was 1.00 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.00) and specificity was 0.20 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.21) (low-certainty evidence). One retrospective study (12,537 participants) evaluated the PEDSPINE criteria and found a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.99) and specificity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.72) (very low-certainty evidence). We did not pool data within the broader CDR categories or investigate heterogeneity due to the small quantity of data and the clinical heterogeneity of studies. Two studies were at high risk of bias. We identified two studies that are awaiting classification pending further information and two ongoing studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of CDRs to detect CSIs in children following blunt trauma, particularly for children under eight years of age. Although most studies had a high sensitivity, this was often achieved at the expense of low specificity and should be interpreted with caution due to a small number of CSIs and wide CIs. Well-designed, large studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of CDRs for the cervical spine clearance in children following blunt trauma, ideally in direct comparison with each other.

The Fate of the Cervical Collar: An Observational Pilot Study Investigating Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Discharge in Children With Mild Traumatic Neck Injuries

OBJECTIVES

After evaluation and treatment of minor traumatic cervical spine injury (CSI), many children are discharged home in a rigid cervical orthosis (RCO). This study investigated their adherence to RCO treatment recommendations. The feasibility of telehealth cervical spine clearance was also explored.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of children 3 to 18 years old with mild CSI evaluated at a level I pediatric trauma center from December 1, 2019, through July 31, 2021. Before emergency department discharge, patients received RCO use instructions and recommendation for follow-up with in-person neurosurgery clinic visit, neurosurgery telehealth visit, or in-person primary care provider visit. The family was responsible for arranging follow-up. Primary outcomes included compliance with follow-up and collar use.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight children (mean age, 11.3 ± 4.1 years) were included. Overall, follow-up contact was available for 51 patients (52%). At 1-week follow-up with 36 children, 64% were collar compliant, 13 had no pain (38% remained in RCO), 14 had mild pain without limitations, 8 had pain with some limitations, and 1 had significant pain. At 2-week follow-up with 31 children, 9 (29%) were collar compliant, 23 had no pain, 7 had mild pain without limitations, and 1 with significant persistent pain was found to have an odontoid fracture requiring C1-2 fusion. Patients/families often discontinued the use of the collar without follow-up (47%). Approximately half utilized a recommended clinical follow-up option for clearance, most often in neurosurgery clinic or using a neurosurgery telehealth visit. The mean time to follow-up was 11.34 ± 4.9 days (range, 3-25 days), and mean collar compliance lasted 9.8 ± 5.7 days (range, 1-25 days). No child experienced any short-term complications related to RCO use.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, a substantial portion of children with mild CSIs discharged from the emergency department with an RCO did not adhere to compliance or follow-up recommendations. Persistent pain requires further evaluation.

Detection of Ischemic Colitis on Routine Lower Endoscopy and Its Implications After Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Ischemic colitis (IC) is a known significant complication after repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Lower endoscopy (colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy) is a helpful adjunct to aid decision making for surgical exploration. We believe routine use of lower endoscopy after rAAA repair provides better patient care through expeditious diagnosis and surgical care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of rAAA repairs from 2008 to 2019. All patients undergo screening lower endoscopy after rAAA repair at our institution. The incidence of IC, mortality, and diagnostic characteristics of routine lower endoscopy was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of these, 182 patients underwent rAAA repair, among which 139 (76%) underwent routine lower endoscopy. Ischemic colitis of any grade was diagnosed in 25% of patients. The 30-day mortality was 11% compared to 19% in those without lower endoscopy. The presence of IC portended a 4-fold increase in mortality rate compared to those without (26% vs 6%, P = .005). Surgical exploration rate was 8% after routine lower endoscopy. Grade III ischemia on lower endoscopy had a sensitivity of 50% (95% CI 12-88) and specificity of 99% (95% CI 94-100) for transmural necrosis.

DISCUSSION

We found increased incidence of IC and reliable diagnostic characteristics of routine lower endoscopy in predicting the presence of transmural colonic ischemia. There was decreased mortality with use of routine lower endoscopy but this was not statistically significant.