What is the best evidence for the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

The Epidemiology of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Incidence Across Populations

BACKGROUND

Childhood obesity is a growing global health crisis with significant health and orthopedic complications such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), a hip disorder characterized by the displacement of the metaphysis relative to the epiphysis. SCFE always requires surgical intervention to prevent severe outcomes such as avascular necrosis, gait abnormalities, and lifelong disability and deformity. Obesity is a well-established risk factor for SCFE; however, emerging evidence suggests that elevated leptin levels may independently contribute to the development of SCFE, regardless of obesity status. This systematic review synthesizes geographic, socioeconomic, age, and sex-related trends in SCFE incidence among children with obesity.

METHODS

Searches of Embase, OVID Medline, and Emcare databases were performed from inception through October 1, 2024. Observational studies reporting the incidence of SCFE in children and adolescents with obesity (aged ≤18 years) across various geographic populations were included. Studies involving children with other chronic health conditions or animal studies on the physis were excluded. Study quality was evaluated using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies scoring system. Descriptive statistics were presented as absolute frequencies with percentages or as weighted means with corresponding measures of variance where applicable.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (5,467 patients) from North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania met inclusion criteria. SCFE patient samples ranged from 55 to 1,630, with some larger cohorts monitoring multiple medical conditions. The mean age was 12.0 years (SD = 0.4), and male-to-female ratios ranged from 1.43:1 to 3.12:1. SCFE incidence varied by region, from 50.5 per 100,000 (Sweden) to 0.33 per 100,000 (South Korea), with a pooled incidence of 9.62 per 100,000. Overweight prevalence was highest in Sweden (66%) and South Korea (67.6%) and lowest in Japan (11.8%). Unilateral SCFE predominated (68.4% to 90.6%). In situ screw fixation was the most common treatment, with 1 study reporting intertrochanteric osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

Geographic variation in SCFE incidence suggests multifactorial influences beyond obesity, including socioeconomic factors, healthcare access, and genetic predisposition. Limited high-quality comparative studies and inconsistent BMI criteria highlight the need for further research to clarify SCFE risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Using Biplanar Fluoroscopy

Percutaneous screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a standard surgical procedure. This can be performed on a radiolucent "flattop" table or a fracture table, which holds the leg stable and can help with the serendipitous reduction of unstable SCFE's. Pivotal to success is accurate screw placement in the center of the epiphysis, adequate threads crossing the physis, and avoidance of screw penetration into the joint. Adequate fluoroscopic visualization in all planes is essential. We have used simultaneous biplanar fluoroscopy for accurate screw placement on a fracture table. The indications, techniques, pearls, and pitfalls of this procedure are presented in this study.

Key Concepts

(1)Percutaneous screw fixation of SCFE is a mainstay of treatment.(2)Simultaneous biplanar fluoroscopy facilitates accurate screw placement.(3)Positioning on a fracture table can promote incidental reduction in cases where this is desirable.(4)Meticulous attention to room setup, patient positioning, and operative technique are necessary for success.

Modified trochanteric triplane osteotomy for chronic moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis - a preliminary report

PURPOSE

Management of chronic moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains controversial. We propose that the modified trochanteric triplane osteotomy(MTTO) with a 1300 angled blade plate, without removal of bone wedge, is effective for addressing moderate and severe chronic SCFE.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent MTTO for moderate to severe chronic SCFE, with at least two years follow-up. Radiological outcomes assessed were osteotomy union, alpha angle, neck shaft angle, mechanical axis deviation and limb length discrepancy(LLD). Functional outcomes were assessed using modified Harris hip score, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients (13 hips) underwent MTTO for chronic SCFE, with a mean age of 12.9 ± 2.1 years. The pre-operative median modified Harris Hip Score was 73. 12 had severe slip and one had moderate slip. All the osteotomies went on to unite by two months. At an average of 37 months follow up, the mean neck shaft angle was 1290, mean alpha angle was 69.70, and mean LLD was 1.05 cm. There was significant improvement in the post-operative modified Harris hip score (p < 0.001), the median post-operative modified Harris hip score was 96, and the median LEFS was 78. One case had bone scan evidence of AVN, but did well with bisphosphonate therapy and one case had a superficial infection.

CONCLUSION

MTTO is a safe and effective option for addressing deformities in chronic moderate and severe SCFE. However, a residual proximal femoral Cam deformity persists after this procedure which may need to be treated with a simultaneous or a staged osteochondroplasty.

Bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis in a cerebral palsy patient: a Case Report

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is usually seen in patients with high body mass index (BMI) and endocrine diseases. SCFE is exceedingly rare among Cerebral palsy (CP) patients due to spasticity present in those patients. Percutaneous in situ fixation is the treatment option for SCFE patients. According to the literature, there's no single case report with SCFE in a spastic CP patient with no prior history of trauma, seizure episodes, or endocrine disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of an 11-year-old spastic cerebral palsy (CP) patient with a physical status of level 5 motor function on the gross motor function classification system. He was brought by his mother to the clinic complaining of bilateral hip pain. The mother denied any history of trauma or any seizure episodes. The pain had started spontaneously. Physical examination showed severe spasticity and bilateral hip abduction with external rotation. Drehmann's sign was positive. Bilateral hip radiographs revealed bilateral partial open femoral capital physis with evidence of SCFE bilaterally. Also, the Southwick angle was measured, and it was severe. The patient was taken to the operating room and treated with closed reduction and percutaneous in situ fixation. He was seen multiple times following surgical intervention, reporting pain relief, and showing complete wound healing.

CONCLUSION

This report concludes that paraplegic spastic CP patients may present with SCFE spontaneously without trauma, seizures, or an underlying endocrine disease. Also, severe spasticity might potentially be a risk factor for SCFE, although further investigations would be necessary to establish a conclusive link.

Favourable outcome of severe, unstable grade III slipped capital femoral epiphysis managed by closed reduction percutaneous pinning with mid-term follow up: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common hip pathology in adolescents. Outcome of SCFE management largely depends on the grading of the pathology. Severe, unstable SCFE poses high risk for avascular necrosis (AVN). The objective of this study is to report a good outcome without AVN in an acute, unstable, high grade SCFE managed by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning along with factors that need to be given consideration.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 13 years old boy was unable to bear weight due to severe pain on right hip after trauma since 2 weeks. Patient was diagnosed with acute, unstable high grade SCFE, patient underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) using cannulated screw and K wire augmented with spica cast. At 12 weeks patient was already fully active. At 18 month follow up there was no sign of AVN with full hip range of movement.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Treatment for unstable, severe SCFE is still challenging. Unreduced severe slippage will deliver serious impingement and end up with early degenerative arthritis. The magnitude of reduction in a severe, unstable SCFE poses high risk for AVN. While some studies claimed reduction is justified only when it is serendipitous, we successfully and purposely performed CRPP.

CONCLUSION

Even after 2 weeks from onset, an acute and severe slippage can still be reduced closely and fixed percutaneously. The hip regain full range of motion with no sign of AVN on x ray at 18 months follow up.

Subcapital realignment osteotomy for the treatment of moderate and severe slipped upper femoral epiphysis: A retrospective study of 123 hips in a tertiary center

Background

The surgical treatment of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial. Treatment ranges from pinning in situ to open dislocation and reduction of the slipped epiphysis. The modified Dunn procedure has been associated with variable avascular necrosis with rates, ranging between 0% and 67%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications of patients who have undergone a subcapital realignment osteotomy (SCRO) in our center.

Methods

A retrospective longitudinal study of the osteotomies performed between 2009 and 2019 in a tertiary referral center for Pediatric Orthopedics in Queensland, Australia. Patient demographics, stability, and severity of slip and surgical outcomes were collected.

Results

A total of 123 procedures were performed on 116 patients. The mean age was 12.4 years, 65 (56%) patients were male and the mean posterior sloping angle was 60.10 with 93 (75%) being severe slips. There were 51 (41.5%) Loder's stable and 72 (58%) unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Our overall avascular necrosis rate following SCRO was 17.8%. Time between surgery and diagnosis did not have an effect on avascular necrosis.

Conclusion

The subcapital realignment osteotomy remains a controversial and complex procedure for the management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis. We found that our cohort demonstrated an avascular necrosis rate in keeping with the existing literature. This indicates that when performed in a high-volume center with experienced surgical staff, it can be an effective treatment option for these patients.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Association of Relative Skeletal Immaturity of the Triradiate Cartilage with Increased Proximal Femoral Deformity in Prophylactic Fixation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Radiographic Study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to describe proximal femoral deformity after contralateral hip prophylactic fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in patients and the association of relative skeletal immaturity with this deformity.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients presenting with a SCFE was conducted from 2009 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were (1) radiographic evidence of a unilateral SCFE treated with in situ fixation, (2) contralateral prophylactic fixation of an unslipped hip, and (3) at least 3 years of follow-up. Measurements were made on radiographs and included greater trochanter height relative to the center of the femoral head, femoral head-neck offset, and femoral neck length. Skeletal maturity was evaluated by assessing the status of the proximal femoral physis and triradiate cartilage (TRC) of the hip, in addition to the length of time to closure of these physes. Values were compared from initial presentation to final follow-up. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were included. Bivariable linear regression demonstrated that an increased relative trochanteric overgrowth was associated with TRC width (β = 3.048, R = 0.585, P = 0.001) and an open TRC (β = -11.400, R = 0.227, P = 0.012). Time to proximal femoral physis closure (β = 1.963, R = 0.444, P = 0.020) and TRC closure (β = 1.983, R = 0.486, P = 0.010) were predictive of increased deformity. In addition, multivariable elimination linear regression demonstrated that TRC width (β = 3.048, R = 0.585, P = 0.001) was predictive of an increased relative trochanteric overgrowth.

DISCUSSION

Patients with an open TRC and increased TRC width are associated with increased relative trochanteric overgrowth when undergoing prophylactic fixation for a unilateral SCFE. Increased caution should be exercised when considering contralateral hip prophylactic fixation in skeletally immature patients presenting with a unilateral SCFE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Decade-long Trends in Incidence of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis in the United States: A Nationwide Database Analysis of Over 33 Million Patients

PURPOSE

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a prevalent pediatric hip disorder linked to severe complications, with childhood obesity as a crucial risk factor. Despite the rising obesity rates, contemporary data on SCFE's epidemiology remain scarce in the United States. This study examined SCFE incidence trends and demographic risk factors in the United States over a decade.

METHODS

A decade-long (2011 to 2020) retrospective cohort study was undertaken using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample. Patients aged younger than 18 years were identified and further analyzed if diagnosed with SCFE through ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes. Key metrics included demographics variables, with multivariate regression assessing demographic factors tied to SCFE, and yearly incidence calculated.

RESULTS

Of 33,180,028 pediatric patients, 11,738 (0.04%) were diagnosed with SCFE. The incidence escalated from 2.46 to 5.96 per 10,000 children, from 2011 to 2020, mirroring childhood obesity trends. Lower socioeconomic status children were predominantly affected. Multivariate analysis revealed reduced SCFE risk in female patients, while Black and Hispanic ethnicities, alongside the Western geographic location, had an increased risk.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores a twofold increase in SCFE incidence over the past decade, aligning with childhood obesity upsurge. Moreover, SCFE disproportionately affects lower SES children, with male sex, Black and Hispanic ethnicities amplifying the risk. This calls for targeted interventions to mitigate SCFE's effect, especially amidst the vulnerable populations.

Static Plantar Pressure under Different Conditions in Children with Surgically Treated Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disease during infancy and adolescence. Our study aimed to analyze static plantar pressure in children with surgically treated unilateral SCFE.

METHODS

Twenty-two children with right SCFE with in situ fixation with one percutaneous screw were assessed by PoData plantar pressure analysis under three different conditions (open eyes, eyes closed, and head retroflexed).

RESULTS

The total foot loading was significantly higher on the unaffected limb compared with the affected one for all the three testing conditions (p < 0.05). When assessing the differences between testing conditions, there were no significant differences for the right and left foot loadings, or for the three sites of weight distribution, except for the right fifth metatarsal head (lower loading in eyes-closed condition in comparison to eyes open, p = 0.0068), left fifth metatarsal head (increased loading in head-retroflexed condition in comparison to eyes open, p = 0.0209), and left heel (lower loading in head-retroflexed condition in comparison to eyes open, p = 0.0293).

CONCLUSION

Even after a successful surgical procedure, differences in foot loading can impact the postural static activities in different conditions (natural eyes-open, eyes-closed, or head-retroflexed posture).

[Evaluation of care for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

The treatment concept for slipped capital femoral epiphysis is still controversial. According to studies, there is currently no recommendation for a universal approach. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the care reality of children with ECF in Germany.

METHODS

The evaluation of the study is performed based on a questionnaire sent to physicians tending to ECF in 2021. Data is compared to the literature.

RESULTS

36 of 47 questionnaires sent out were included. Overall, no significant difference in ECF care was proven in terms of annual caseload or the size of hospital.

CONCLUSION

A high variance in operative SCFE treatment is reported. According to current literature, the modified Dunn procedure is considered the best therapeutic option to date, especially for patients with severe or chronic ECF. However, compared with alternative care options, this is not feasible in every hospital due to its complicating and challenging nature. Central registration, minimum volume regulation, and expansion of continuing education measures can contribute to optimization.

A Delphi consensus study on the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Considerable consensus in mild and moderate slips and limited consensus in severe slips

Purpose

The aim of this expert consensus study was to establish consensus on the treatment of different types of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and on the use of prophylactic screw fixation of the contralateral unaffected side.

Methods

In this study, a four-round Delphi method was used. Questionnaires including all possible theoretical slip scenarios were sent online to 14 participants, experienced in the field of children's orthopedics and in the treatment of hip disorders in children.

Results

In-situ fixation was considered to be the first treatment choice in all types of mild slip scenarios and in moderate, stable ones. Performing in-situ fixation was not favored in moderate, unstable, and in all severe slip scenarios. In moderate to severe, unstable slip scenarios, there was consensus on the use of gentle closed or open reduction and internal fixation. Any consensus was not established in the optimal treatment of severe, stable slips. There was also consensus on the use of prophylactic screw fixation of the contralateral side in case of co-existing endocrine disorder and younger age.

Conclusions

The establishment of consensus on the treatment of all types of slipped capital femoral epiphysis even among the experienced surgeons does not seem to be possible. The severity of the slip and stability of the slip are the primary and secondary determinants of the surgeons' treatment choices, respectively. In-situ fixation is still the preferred treatment option in several slip types. Gentle capital realignment by closed or open means is recommended in displaced, unstable slips. Prophylactic screw fixation of the contralateral side is indicated under certain circumstances.

Level of evidence

level V.

Comparing pinning in situ and capital realignment procedures for severe, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a systematic review

In severe, stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis, it is unclear whether pinning in situ (PIS) or capital realignment procedures (CRPs) are superior. Our primary aim was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following each strategy. Secondary aims were to compare rates of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) and complications. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched according to an agreed strategy. Narrative review articles, case reports, letters to the editor and articles not written in English were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of the 132 citations identified, 127 were excluded following de-duplication and application of the exclusion criteria. Three observational studies comparing PIS with CRP and two case series considering CRP alone were identified. One article was considered fair quality, and four articles were considered poor. In total, 198 hips from five studies were included (66 PIS, 132 CRP). PIS was associated with moderate-good functional outcomes, and CRP with good-high outcomes. Two comparative studies reported significantly better PROMs following CRP. AVN was reported in 1.5% following PIS and 10.6% following CRP. Regarding other complications, chondrolysis occurred in 3.0% following PIS and 2.4% following CRP. Femoroacetabular impingement rates were markedly higher following PIS (60.6% versus 2.3%). Reoperation rates were also greater following PIS (34.5% versus 13.3%). PIS tends to be associated with favourable AVN rates, but CRP with favourable PROMs and complication rates. However, comparisons were drawn from heterogeneous studies lacking long-term follow-up. Further high-quality research is required.

The Free-Gliding screw for slipped capital femoral epiphysis : is it safe, does it glide, and does age matter?

AIMS

Fixation techniques used in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that allow continued growth of the femoral neck, rather than inducing epiphyseal fusion in situ, have the advantage of allowing remodelling of the deformity. The aims of this study were threefold: to assess whether the Free-Gliding (FG) SCFE screw prevents further slip; to establish whether, in practice, it enables lengthening and gliding; and to determine whether the age of the patient influences the extent of glide.

METHODS

All patients with SCFE who underwent fixation using FG SCFE screws after its introduction at our institution, with minimum three years' follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively as part of ongoing governance. All pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated. The demographics of the patients, the grade of slip, the extent of lengthening of the barrel of the screw and the restoration of Klein's line were recorded. Subanalysis was performed according to sex and age.

RESULTS

A total of 19 hips in 13 patients were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 11.5 years (9 to 13) and the mean follow-up was 63 months (45 to 83). A total of 13 FG SCFE screws were used for the fixation of mild or moderate SCFE, with six contralateral prophylactic fixations. No hip with SCFE showed a further slip after fixation and there were no complications. Lengthening occurred in 15 hips (79%), with a mean lengthening of the barrel of 6.8 mm (2.5 to 13.6) at final follow-up. Remodelling occurred in all hips with lengthening of the barrel. There was statistically more lengthening in patients who were aged < 12 years, regardless of sex (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The FG SCFE screw is effective in preventing further slip in patients with SCFE. Lengthening of the barrel occurred in most hips, and thus allowed remodelling. This was most marked in younger children, regardless of sex. Based on this study, this device should be considered for use in patients with SCFE aged < 12 years instead of standard pinning in situ.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):215-219.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic options

One of the most prevalent hip pathologies that develops during adolescence is Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE), and over the past few decades, its incidence has been rising. To ensure an early diagnosis and prompt intervention, orthopedic surgeons should be aware of this entity. Review of recent developments in clinical examination and imaging diagnostic procedures. The presentation includes commonly used imaging methods, slippage measurement techniques, and classification schemes that are pertinent to treatment. An overview of SCFE surgery based on pertinent study findings and knowledge gained from ongoing clinical practice. The gold standard treatment for stable SCFE cases— those in which the continuity of the metaphysis and epiphysis is preserved—is pinning in situ using a single cannulated screw without reduction. However, there are disagreements over the best course of action for stable moderate/severe SCFE. On the best surgical strategy for unstable epiphysiolysis, no universal agreement has been reached. Finding the surgical procedure that will improve the long-term outcomes of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis is the question at hand.

The Effect of the Type of Screw Fixation Used in the Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Background

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains among the most common hip disorders in the adolescent population. The management of SCFE remains controversial; however, the aim of fixation is to stabilize the physis and prevent further slippage. In situ fixation remains the gold standard; however, in the young population, it can lead to reduced femoral neck growth and complications such as leg length discrepancies. The ideal form of in situ fixation for mild to moderate SCFE would stabilize the slip and allow continued proximal femoral growth. This study aimed to determine if partially threaded screws allowed more neck growth than fully threaded screws.

Methods

A retrospective review of the radiographs of all patients undergoing in situ fixation for SCFE using partially threaded and fully threaded screws. Measurements included neck length, neck-to-screw ratio, neck shaft angle, neck width, and articular-trochanteric distance. Parameters were compared over a two-year period to determine whether there was any difference in proximal femoral growth between the two types of screws.

Results

Fully threaded screw neck length increased by 5 mm versus 5 mm for proximally threaded screws (P ≤ 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to neck width, neck shaft angle, and articular-trochanteric distance.

Conclusions

No difference was observed in proximal femoral growth. Regardless of which type of fixation is used, neck length continues to increase by approximately 3 mm per year.

Prevalence of Avascular Necrosis Following Surgical Treatments in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The choice of treatment for unstable and severely displaced slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the prevalence of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) following various treatments for unstable SCFE. Various databases were searched to identify articles published until 4 February 2022. A random-effects model was used to examine prevalence as well as risk ratios with confidence intervals (CIs) of 95%. Thirty-three articles were analyzed in this study. The pooled prevalences of AVN in pinning in situ, pinning following intentional closed reduction, pinning following unintentional closed reduction, and open reduction via the Parsch method, subcapital osteotomy and the modified Dunn procedure were 18.5%, 23.0%, 27.6%, 9.9%, 18.6% and 19.9%, respectively. The risk of developing AVN in pinning following intentional closed reduction was found to be 1.62 times higher than pinning in situ; however, this result was not significant. The prevalence of AVN in open reduction was lowest when performed via the Parsch method; however, this finding should be interpreted with caution, since the majority of slips so-treated are of mild and moderate types as compared with the subcapital osteotomy and modified Dunn procedures, which are predominantly used to treat severely displaced slips. As the risk ratio between intentional closed reduction and the modified Dunn method showed no significant difference, we believe that the modified Dunn method has the advantage of meticulously preserving periosteal blood flow to the epiphysis, thus minimizing AVN risk. In comparison with intentional closed reduction, the modified Dunn method is used predominantly in cases of severe slips.

Hardware Impingement Is Associated With Shorter Screw Length in Patients Treated With In Situ Screw Fixation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: An In Vivo Arthroscopic Evaluation

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Screw Thread Configuration Has No Effect on Outcomes of In Situ Fixation for Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists regarding the optimal surgical management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Treatment goals include avoiding slip progression and sequelae such as avascular necrosis (AVN). Factors associated with surgical implants merit further research. This study investigates the effect of screw thread configuration and the number of screws on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients undergoing cannulated, stainless steel, in situ screw fixation of SCFE between January 2005 and April 2018 were included. Procedure laterality, screw number and thread configuration (partially threaded/fully threaded), bilateral diagnosis, Loder classification, final follow-up, patient demographics, and endocrinopathy history were analyzed. Primary outcomes were return to the operating room (ROR), AVN, hardware failure/removal, and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

RESULTS

Most patients received a single (86.2%), partially threaded (81.6%) screw; most were unilateral (67.8%) and stable (79.6%). Mean follow-up was 2.0±2.7 years, with a 15.8% rate of ROR, 5.3% exhibiting AVN, 6.6% exhibiting FAI, and 9.2% experiencing hardware failure/removal. Number of screws was the sole predictor of ROR [odds ratio (OR)=3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-9.49]. Unstable SCFE increased the odds of AVN (OR=38.44; 95% CI: 4.35-339.50) as did older age (OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.01-2.03). Female sex increased risk for FAI (OR=4.87, 95% CI: 1.20-19.70), and bilateral SCFE elevated risk for hardware failure/removal versus unilateral SCFE (OR=4.41, 95% CI: 1.39-14.00). Screw thread configuration had no significant effect on any outcome (for each, P ≥0.159).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of ROR, AVN, FAI, and hardware failure/removal did not differ between patients treated with partially threaded or fully threaded screws. The use of 2 screws was associated with an increased likelihood of ROR. These findings suggest that screw thread configuration has no impact on complication rates, whereas screw number may be an important consideration in SCFE fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Prophylactic fixation of the unaffected contralateral side in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis seems favorable: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) occurs in adolescents and has an incidence of around 10 per 100000 children. Children presenting with a unilateral SCFE are 2335 times more likely to develop a contralateral SCFE than the general population. Prognostic factors that have been suggested to increase the risk of contralateral slip include a younger patient, an underlying endocrine disorder, growth hormone use and a higher radiographic posterior sloping angle. However, there is still much debate on the advantages and disadvantages of prophylactic fixation of the unaffected side in an otherwise healthy patient.

AIM

To investigate the risk rate of contralateral SCFE and assess the (dis)advantages of prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane databases. Search terms included 'slipped capital femoral epiphysis,' 'fixation,' 'contralateral,' and derivatives. The eligibility of the acquired articles was independently assessed by the authors and additional relevant articles were included through cross-referencing. Publications were considered eligible for inclusion if they presented data about otherwise healthy children with primarily unilateral SCFE and the outcomes of prophylactically pinning their unaffected side, or about the rates of contralateral slips and complications thereof. The study quality of the included articles was assessed independently by the authors by means of the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria.

RESULTS

Of 293 identified unique publications, we included 26 studies with a total of 12897 patients. 1762 patients (14%) developed a subsequent symptomatic contralateral slip. In addition, 38% of patients developed a subsequent slip on the contralateral side without experiencing clinical symptoms. The most outspoken advantage of prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in the literature is prevention of an (asymptomatic) slip, thus reducing the increased risk of avascular necrosis (AVN), cam morphology and osteoarthritis. Disadvantages include an increased risk of infection, AVN, peri-implant fractures, loss of fixation as well as migration of hardware and morphologic changes as a consequence of growth guidance. These risks, however, appeared to only occur incidentally and were usually mild compared to the risks involved with an actual SCFE.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of prophylactic pinning of the unaffected side in otherwise healthy patients with unilateral SCFE seem to outweigh the disadvantages. The final decision for treatment remains to be patient-tailored.

Comparing complications of outpatient management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Blount’s disease: A database study

BACKGROUND

Currents trends in pediatric orthopaedics has seen an increase in surgeries being successfully completed in an outpatient setting. Two recent examples include slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and Blount’s disease. Surgical indications are well-studied for each pathology, but to our knowledge, there is an absence in literature analyzing safety and efficacy of inpatient vs outpatient management of either condition. We believed there would be no increase in adverse outcomes associated with outpatient treatment of either conditions.

AIM

To investigate whether outpatient surgery for SCFE and Blount’s disease is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

The 2015-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Registries were used to compare patient characteristics, rates of complications, and readmissions between outpatient and inpatient surgery for SCFE and Blount’s disease.

RESULTS

Total 1788 SCFE database entries were included, 30% were performed in an outpatient setting. In situ pinning was used in 98.5% of outpatient surgeries and 87.8% of inpatient surgeries (P < 0.0001). Inpatients had a greater percent of total complications than outpatients 2.57% and 1.65% respectively. Regarding Blount’s disease, outpatient surgeries constituted 41.2% of the 189 procedures included in our study. The majority of inpatients were treated with a tibial osteotomy, while the majority of outpatients had a physeal arrest (P < 0.0001). Complications were encountered in 7.4% of patients, with superficial surgical site infections and wound dehiscence being the most common. 1.6% of patients had a readmission. No differences in complication and readmission risks were found between inpatients and outpatients.

CONCLUSION

The current trend is shifting towards earlier discharges and performing procedures in an outpatient setting. This can be safely performed for a large portion of children with SCFE and Blount’s disease without increasing the risk of complications or readmissions. Osteotomies are more commonly performed in an inpatient setting where monitoring is available.

Risk factors for early symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement following in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

In situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) results in residual deformity that can cause femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). It is unknown what factors could help differentiate patients who are more likely to become symptomatic. We performed a retrospective review of 55 hips treated with in situ pinning for SCFE and subsequent secondary deformity correction procedure for symptomatic FAI and compared them to 39 asymptomatic hips with SCFE deformity using multivariable analysis. Case patients were slightly older than controls (12.6 vs 11.3 years, p = 0.0002) but had similar BMI. The mean epiphyseal-diaphyseal angle was 56° in cases versus 44° in controls (p = 0.0019). Cases were significantly more likely to have obligate external rotation with hip flexion, external foot progression, flexion <90°, antalgic limp, and Trendelenburg lurch. On radiographs, most cases had a head-neck offset ≤0 mm, a distinct metaphyseal corner prominence, acetabular retroversion, and an alpha angle ≥60°. Most controls also had head-neck offset ≤0 mm. Pre-pinning, older age (OR = 1.98 per year, p = 0.0016) and initial epiphyseal-diaphyseal angle (OR = 1.04 per degree, p = 0.018) significantly increased the odds of having symptomatic FAI. Post-pinning, external foot progression increased the odds of symptomatic FAI by 10.48 (p = 0.017), and an alpha angle ≥60° resulted in 11.4 times higher odds of symptomatic FAI (p = 0.011). The linear correlation between epiphyseal-diaphyseal and alpha angle was poor (r = 0.28). Older age and initial epiphyseal-diaphyseal pre-pinning mildly increased the odds of eventual symptomatic FAI. This information can help the surgeon to predict which patients may develop symptomatic FAI.

Controversies in the Management of Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) involves anterior-superior displacement of the proximal metaphysis relative to the epiphysis of the proximal femur. It is the most common hip disorder affecting the pediatric population. SCFE has a higher incidence in adolescent males in addition to racial and regional predilections. Despite being described over 500 years ago, there remains controversy surrounding the topic. This article examines current concepts in SCFE, with a spotlight on treatment. An evidence-based discussion of treatment controversies regarding reduction method, fixation construct, supplemental procedures and surgical timing is included.

Novel Application of Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Training: A Case Report

Case:

A percutaneous pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis is described after the use of immersive virtual reality (iVR) training. This case report documents the first reported example of an immediate translation of surgical skill from iVR to the operating room.

Conclusion:

There is increasing evidence for the use of iVR in orthopaedic education. Several randomized controlled trials demonstrate improved trainee performance relative to control when measured in analogous operating room assessments. This is the first case report demonstrating direct patient care after the use of iVR. The implications of cost-effectiveness through skill transfer and patient safety are highlighted.

Long-Term Results of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Treated with the Modified Dunn Procedure in a Colombian Cohort

Backgroud

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a severe and catastrophic disorder that affects the hips of adolescents. Many reports about surgical procedures to treat this condition have been published, but to our knowledge, there are no published results of treatment in Latin American patients. This study describes the clinical and radiological results of the modified Dunn procedure with the surgical approach described by Ganz to treat mild to severe SCFE in a cohort of Colombian pediatric patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients (22 hips) with SCFE treated with surgical dislocation of the hip from 2005 to 2017. The same pediatric orthopedic surgeon performed all operations. Clinical outcome was assessed using the range of movement and Merle d'Aubigné score, while radiological measurements and assessment included the slip angle and Tönnis score.

Results

The average duration of follow-up was 29 months (range, 12-72 months). Of all cases, 17 presented with acute-on-chronic symptoms. Preoperatively, all 22 hips were classified as poor according to the Merle d'Aubigné score. Preoperative radiological classification showed compromise grade II or III in 20 hips. Last follow-up Merle d'Aubigné score rated 17 cases as good or excellent (p < 0.05). The postoperative radiological classification was grade I or II in all 22 cases, and the Tönnis score was stage II in 3 cases and stage III in 4 cases.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the modified Dunn osteotomy performed through the Ganz technique could be safely and effectively used to treat patients with mild to severe SCFE.

Intraoperative assessment of femoral head perfusion during surgical hip dislocation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Avascular necrosis is the most devastating complication of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, leading to collapse of the femoral head, increased risk of osteoarthritis and the requirement of early total hip arthroplasty. It is believed that intraoperative femoral head perfusion assessment may be an accurate predictor of post-operative avascular necrosis (radiographic collapse). At our institution, femoral head perfusion is assessed intraoperatively during all sub-capital realignment procedures. We hypothesize that our method is accurate in predicting the risk of developing post-operative avascular necrosis. In this retrospective study, we collected data from all patients that had intraoperative blood flow measurements during sub-capital realignment procedures. We correlated this with long-term radiographs looking for radiographic collapse. The intraoperative femoral head perfusion assessments during sub-capital realignment procedures for slipped capital femoral epiphysis at our institution, between January 2015 and March 2020 inclusive were assessed for reliability. In total, 26 of 35 patients had intraoperative femoral head perfusion present. Only 2 (8%) of these patients developed radiographic collapse. In contrast, 7 (78%) of the 9 patients who did not have femoral head perfusion present intraoperatively developed radiographic collapse, indicating that our method may be reliable in predicting a patient’s post-operative risk of developing avascular necrosis.

Degenerative changes of the hip following in situ fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a minimum 18-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

In situ fixation (ISF) is currently still the 'gold standard' treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and has shown acceptable results at mid-term follow-up. This study aims to evaluate functional, clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes after this procedure.

METHODS

We reviewed 64 SCFE patients (76 SCFE hips) treated with ISF between 1983 and 1998. 82.9% were stable hips and 17.1% unstable according to Loder's definition. Initial radiographs demonstrated a mild slip in 50%, moderate in 41.3% and severe in 8.7% based on the Southwick angle. Long-term outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and Tegner activity scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, VAS function, flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR) test, extent of internal-rotation at 90° of hip flexion and Tönnis classification for hip osteoarthritis (OA).

RESULTS

10 (15.6%) SCFE hips were converted to a total hip replacement (THR) after a mean of 16 years. 38 (59.4%) patients underwent a clinical and radiographic examination after a mean follow-up of 23 (range 18-33) years. 12 (18.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. 74% of SCFE hips demonstrated degenerative change on radiography or were converted to THR (Tönnis 1: 33.3%, 2: 18.5%, 3 or THR: 22.2%). There were 3 cases of avascular necrosis (AVN) all in unstable hips. Mean mHHS was 86.8/100, UCLA activity score 7.5/10, Tegner activity score 3.8/10, VAS pain 1.7/10 and VAS function 1.5/10. 20% of SCFE hips were found to have a positive FADIR-test and a limited internal-rotation of 19.7° versus 36.1° (p < 0.001) in contralateral normal hips.

DISCUSSION

This long-term follow-up study of ISF for SCFE shows that although complication rates in terms of AVN are low, a high number of patients become symptomatic and have a limited function. Degenerative changes are common with 22.2% of hips developing end-stage hip OA (Tönnis 3 or THR). It is important that patients and parents are informed about these risks.

[Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: clinical presentation, diagnostic procedure and classification]

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a frequent chronic and often bilateral atraumatic slippage of the epiphysis relative to the femoral neck in adolescence. The success of the treatment depends on the extent of the slippage and possible complications.

OBJECTIVES

Review on current trends in clinical examination and diagnostic imaging protocols. Commonly used imaging techniques, methods of measuring the slippage and treatment-relevant classification schemes are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An overview on the clinical findings, the diagnostic procedures and the classification of SCFE based on relevant study results and experience gained in our daily clinical practice.

RESULTS

Early diagnosis of SCFE is essential, as a delay in diagnosis regularly leads to an increase in slippage with an increased risk of subsequent damage to the blood vessels, which can lead to irreversible damage of the joint. Symptoms and findings are frequently subtle and nonspecific, often leading to delay in diagnosis and treatment and, consequently, to the manifestation of massive deformities. X‑ray imaging is the primary imaging modality, whereas MRI, computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound are helpful in surgical planning and prognostic evaluation. Postoperatively, they provide information on short and long-term complications.

DISCUSSION

The delay in the diagnosis of SCFE is still present in the literature as well as in our own patient population, indicating that a repeated, consistent training on this topic is essential to prevent harm to patients. Whether patients benefit from advanced imaging techniques such as MRI or CT is questionable and should be screened case by case.

The outcome of in-situ fixation of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis

There is limited information regarding the outcome of in-situ fixation of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (U-SCFE). We aimed to report the outcome of a cohort of patients with U-SCFE that were treated with in-situ fixation, by comparing it to the outcome of patients with stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (S-SCFE). After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective analysis of patients with SCFE that were treated with in-situ fixation at a single institution between 2005 and 2016 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic data was collected. The rate of complications, including avascular necrosis (AVN), and the presence of impingement were recorded. The outcome of U-SCFEs was compared to that of S-SCFEs. A total of 184 SCFEs in 154 patients (64% male; mean age 11.9 years) with a mean follow-up of 27 months were included. The SCFE was classified as stable in 90.2% of cases, and unstable in 9.8% of. The mean duration of symptoms prior to presentation was 3.2 months. The mean Southwick slip angle at the time of presentation was 33°. A single screw was used to fix all S-SCFEs, while U-SCFEs were treated with either one (66.7%) or two (33.3%) screws. For U-SCFEs, the joint was decompressed at the time of surgery by either needle aspiration or small capsular incision. The final range of motion of the affected hip was comparable in both groups. The overall rate of impingement was 29%. The rate of impingement in S-SCFE and U-SCFE was 27.6 and 44.4%, respectively (P = 0.1). Eight patients required a subsequent surgery (4.4%), all of whom originally have had a S-SCFE. Radiographic signs of AVN of the femoral head were seen in 2.2% of cases. The incidence of AVN of the femoral head in S-SCFEs and U-SCFEs was 1.2 and 11.1%, respectively (P = 0.04). The results of this study support previous findings that the risk of AVN is significantly higher in U-SCFE as compared to S-SCFEs.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current management strategies

In orthopedic literature, there is little consensus regarding the best management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Controversies and disparate trends derive from differences in clinical presentation, various classifications, and a variety of surgical procedures that have been described. Currently, there are no evidence-based recommendations. Surgical procedures vary, and they can be divided into fixation in situ, compensatory osteotomies, and direct corrections of the deformity at the head–neck junction. The first and second group of procedures have so far not gained optimal control over the risk of avascular necrosis or cannot achieve an anatomically aligned epiphysis with normal blood supply. On the other hand, the third technique can achieve this target and prevent residual deformity and the development of early hip arthritis, but it is not widely accepted, because of its surgical complexity. The purpose of this work is to present an overview of current knowledge and provide an orientation on clinical and surgical management of the patient suffering from SCFE.

The results of osteotomy at the base of femoral neck with osteoplasty in restoration of abductor function and strength in slipped capital femoral epiphysis

AIMS

The aims of this study were to evaluate the abductor function in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), comparing the results of a corrective osteotomy at the base of the femoral neck and osteoplasty with 1) in situ epiphysiodesis for mild SCFE, 2) contralateral unaffected hips, and 3) hips from healthy individuals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 24 patients (mean age 14.9 years (sd 1.6); 17 male and seven female patients) with moderate or severe SCFE (28 hips) underwent base of neck osteotomy and osteoplasty between 2012 and 2015. In situ epiphysiodesis was performed in seven contralateral hips with mild slip. A control cohort was composed of 15 healthy individuals (mean age 16.5 years (sd 2.5); six male and nine female patients). The abductor function was assessed using isokinetic dynamometry and range of abduction, with a minimum one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

We found no differences in mean peak abductor torque between the hips that underwent osteotomy and those that received in situ epiphysiodesis (p = 0.63), but the torque was inferior in comparison with contralateral hips without a slip (p < 0.01) and hips from control individuals (p < 0.001). The abduction strength was positively correlated with the range of hip abduction (R = 0.36; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although the abductor strength was not restored to normal levels, moderate and severe SCFE treated with osteotomy at the base of the femoral neck and osteoplasty showed abductor function similar to in situ epiphysiodesis in hips with less severe displacement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1524-32.

The reliability of radiostereometric analysis in determining physeal motion in slipped capital femoral epiphysis in standard uniplanar and low-dose EOS biplanar radiography: a phantom model study

Physeal closure after slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation can be difficult to assess on two-dimensional conventional radiographs. Radiostereometric analysis offers improved motion detection over conventional radiography, whereas the EOS biplanar imager provides a means for low radiation weight-bearing images. This phantom study assessed the reliability of measuring motion using radiostereometric analysis in the EOS using a slipped capital femoral epiphysis model. The accuracy and precision were better than 0.09±0.05 mm and 0.20°±0.36° when centered in the imaging space, were within the limits of clinical significance, and were not different from a standard uniplanar radiostereometric system.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Review for Pediatricians

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one of the most common hip pathologies that occurs during adolescence, and its incidence has been increasing over the past decades. For this reason, pediatricians should be aware of this entity to ensure an early diagnosis and intervene in a timely manner. The typical patient with SCFE is an adolescent who is obese presenting with hip pain, but it can also occur in children who are not obese; therefore, SCFE should be part of the differential diagnosis in any skeletally immature patient presenting with hip or knee pain. This article provides an overview for the clinician of relevant aspects of this disease that can lead to serious long-term consequences if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. [Pediatr Ann. 2018;47(9):e377-e380.].

Similar femoral growth and deformity with one screw versus two smooth pins for slipped capital femoral epiphysis

PURPOSE

To compare longitudinal growth and cam deformity of the proximal femur after treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) with one screw versus two smooth pins.

METHODS

We studied 43 patients (29 males, 14 females; mean age, 12.1 years; range, 9.5-14 years) with idiopathic unilateral SCFE treated with in situ fixation with one cannulated screw (group A, n = 23) or two smooth pins (group B, n = 20). Anteroposterior and frog-leg radiographs of the pelvis were evaluated for each patient at initial presentation, post-operatively and at physeal closure. Longitudinal growth was evaluated using the femoral neck length (FNL), the caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, and the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD). Cam deformity was assessed using the anterior offset α-angle and the head-neck offset ratio (HNOR). The mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range, 4-7 years).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean CCD angle was 138.3°, the mean α-angle was 66.1° and the mean HNOR was - 0.030. At physeal closure, mean CCD angle significantly decreased to 133.6°, mean α-angle significantly reduced to 52.1°, and mean HNOR significantly improved to + 0.039. CCD, FNL, ATD, α-angle, and HNOR were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One screw or two smooth pins result in similar longitudinal growth and deformity of the proximal femur after SCFE. The femoral head-neck junction remarkably improves until physeal closure; however, residual cam deformity is not avoided after in situ pinning. The complication rate with smooth pins is higher.

Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The European Perspective

Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis remains a contentious and debated issue. The opinion for the correct method of treatment can differ not only between different continents and nations, but also between units and surgeons within individual units. We aim to review the European perspective on the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and consider the trends for treatment among the European orthopaedic surgical community.

Comparison between modified Dunn procedure and in situ fixation for severe stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Background and purpose - The best treatment option for severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is still controversial. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of modified Dunn procedure (D) and in situ fixation (S) in severe SCFE. Patients and methods - We retrospectively compared D and S, used for severe stable SCFE (posterior sloping angle (PSA) > 50°) in 29 patients (15 D; 14 S). Propensity analysis and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) to adjust for baseline differences were performed. Patients were followed for 2-7 years. Results - Avascular necrosis (AVN) occurred in 3 patients out of 15, after D, causing conversion to total hip replacement (THR) in 2 cases. In S, 1 hip developed chondrolysis, requiring THR 3 years after surgery. 3 symptomatic femoroacetabular impingements (FAI) occurred after S, requiring corrective osteotomy in 1 hip, and osteochondroplasty in another case. The risk of early re-operation was similar between the groups. The slippage was corrected more accurately and reliably by D. The Nonarthritic Hip Score was similar between groups, after adjusting for preoperative and postoperative variables. Interpretation - Although D was superior to S in restoring the proximal femoral anatomy, without increasing the risk of early re-operation, some concern remains regarding the potential risk of AVN in group D.

Restoration of Blood Flow to the Proximal Femoral Epiphysis in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis by Modified Dunn Procedure: A Preliminary Angiographic and Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Study

BACKGROUND

The major complication of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The purpose of this study was to document by angiography the preoperative and postoperative perfusion to the proximal femoral epiphysis following an unstable SCFE. A specific aim was to determine whether blood flow could be restored. A secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor to assess blood flow within the femoral head intraoperatively.

METHODS

Nine patients with an unstable SCFE underwent superselective angiogram of the medial circumflex femoral artery preoperatively, followed by operative fixation with an open reduction using a modified Dunn approach. Femoral head blood flow was evaluated with an ICP monitor. Angiography was repeated postoperatively. Patients were followed radiographically to assess for AVN.

RESULTS

Follow-up averaged 22 months. Six patients did not have arterial flow to the femoral head on the preoperative angiogram. Flow was restored postoperatively on angiogram in 4 of the 6 patients. Two patients developed AVN. One had no flow to the femoral head preoperatively or postoperatively on angiogram and complete tearing of the periosteum was noted. In 1 patient, there was no ICP waveform after the initial reduction. After removing more callous and repeating reduction, the waveform returned. Of the 2 patients with AVN, 1 had an ICP waveform after reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents that some patients with unstable SCFE present with reduced femoral head blood supply due to SCFE. It also demonstrates blood flow restoration in 4 patients by angiogram and 5 by ICP monitor after surgical treatment. No patient immediately lost blood flow due to surgery. ICP monitor is a safe intraoperative tool for real-time assessment of femoral head blood flow during open reduction of unstable SCFE. Presence of flow by ICP is not a guarantee that AVN will not develop, but absence of flow was predictive of AVN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level I-prognostic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Femoral pseudoaneurysm as a complication of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treatment

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a very frequently seen condition in orthopedics centers worldwide. Even in successfully treated cases, complications related either with the pathology per se or with the chosen synthesis method are not rare.

This report presents a case of bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with pinning, in which one of the limbs developed a very rare condition: the formation of a femoral pseudoaneurysm that ruptured.

Long-term Results of Combined Epiphysiodesis and Imhauser Intertrochanteric Osteotomy in SCFE: A Retrospective Study on 53 Hips

BACKGROUND

The management of moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis is still an issue. The main concern is represented by the choice of an intra-articular or an extra-articular osteotomy to correct the deformity. Theoretically, the intra-articular osteotomy allows the best correction, but it is technically demanding and involves a higher risk of avascular necrosis (AVN); conversely, an extra-articular intertrochanteric osteotomy (ITO) is easier and involves a lower risk of early complications, but may lead to femoroacetabular impingement, resulting in early osteoarthritis and the need for total hip replacement (THR).The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term survivorship free from THR after combined epiphysiodesis and Imhauser ITO.

METHODS

From 1975 to 2000, 45 patients (53 hips) underwent a combined epiphysiodesis and Imhauser ITO. There were 27 male and 18 female patients with an average age of 12.8±1.9 years. All cases showed a posterior sloping angle >40 degrees (mean, 69±16 degrees). The cumulative survivorship was determined according to Kaplan and Meier, with the end point defined as conversion to THR.

RESULTS

A total of 6 patients (6 hips; 11%) had a follow-up <2 years. Among them, no postoperative complications occurred. For the remaining 39 patients (47 hips, 89%), the mean follow-up was 21±11 years. Four early postoperative complications were reported (2 AVN, 2 chondrolysis). The cumulative 39 years' survivorship free from THR was 68.5% (95% confidence interval, 42.4%-84.7%). The age at surgery (hazard ratio=1.849 per year older, P=0.017) and the postoperative onset of AVN or chondrolysis (hazard ratio=10.146, P=0.010) affected the long-term prognosis significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined epiphysiodesis and Imhauser ITO is a valid surgical option in moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis, preserving the natural hip for at least 39 years in the majority of the patients. Care must be taken to avoid AVN or chondrolysis. The age at surgery affects the prognosis negatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-a retrospective study.

Opinion survey of members of British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery related to specific case scenarios in slipped capital femoral epiphysis

The aim of this study was to assess contemporary management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by surveying members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). A questionnaire with five case vignettes was used. Two questions examined the timing of surgery for an acute unstable SCFE in a child presenting at 6 and 48 h after start of symptoms. Two further questions explored the preferred method of fixation in mild and severe stable SCFE. The final question examined the management of the contralateral normal hip. Responses were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and the data was analysed using a χ-test. The response rate was 56% (110/196). Overall, 88% (97/110) responded that if a child presented with an acute unstable SCFE within 6 h, they would treat it within 24 h of presentation, compared with 41% (45/110) for one presenting 48 h after the onset of symptoms (P<0.0001). Overall, 53% (58/110) of surveyed BSCOS members would offer surgery for an unstable SCFE between 1 and 7 days after onset of symptoms. Single screw fixation in situ for mild stable SCFE was advocated by 96% (106/110) with 71% (78/110) using this method for the treatment of severe stable SCFE. Corrective osteotomy is used by 2% (2/110) and 25% (28/110) of respondents for mild and severe stable SCFE, respectively (P<0.0001). Surgeons preferring osteotomy are more likely to perform an intracapsular technique. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral normal hip was performed by 27% (30/110) of respondents. There are significant differences in opinions between BSCOS members as to the optimal management of SCFE. This reflects the variable recommendations and quality in the current scientific literature. Further research is therefore required to determine best practice and enable consensus to be reached.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of management in the hip impingement era

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains the most common adolescent hip disorder. Most cases present with stable slips, and in situ fixation is the most commonly adopted treatment worldwide. The introduction of the concept of femoroacetabular impingement and subsequent studies have revealed SCFE-related hip impingement to be a significant pre-arthritic condition, and the previously suggested remodeling of the proximal femur after in situ fixation has been called into question. Complex proximal femoral osteotomies and more recently intra-articular procedures via surgical hip dislocation have been employed. The literature is still lacking a strong evidence to undertake such aggressive procedures. Moreover, the application of a particular procedure regarding the nature of the slip, being stable or unstable, the degree of the slip, and the condition of the physis has not been extensively described in the literature. The purpose of this article is to outline the SCFE-related hip impingement, to review the best evidence for the current treatment options for both stable and unstable slips, and to develop an algorithm for decision making.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a spectrum of surgical care and changes over time

PURPOSE

To survey the spectrum of surgical care in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This information is valuable in counselling the patient about the future treatment course.

METHODS

Data for this study were obtained from the Pediatric Hospital Information System (PHIS) between 2004 and 2015. For all patients with an ICD9 diagnosis of 732.2, gender, ethnicity, hospital, medical record number, date of birth/admission/discharge, type of admission, length of stay, disposition and treatment(s) rendered were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 13 168 procedures were performed in 11 058 unique SCFE patients, or 1.2 procedures per patient. Primary procedures were those performed for the initial treatment of the SCFE and secondary procedures as reconstructive and salvage. The majority (11 693, 88.8%) were primary. There was significant variation in the ratio of primary and secondary procedures by institution. There was a decline in in situ fixation as the initial SCFE treatment with an increase in open reduction and internal fixation over the 12-year span. Similarly, there was a significant increase in the number of secondary procedures over time as well as complications and implant removal. There was no change over time in the diagnosis of avascular necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The average number of surgical procedures in patients was in the range of 1 to 6 and varied widely by hospital. Each physician should know his/her own hospital's data for the percentage of subsequent procedures so as to counsel the patient and family properly. The increasing number of complications over time may reflect the increasing number of more complex procedures.

Is the timing of surgery associated with avascular necrosis after unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

An unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is associated with a high rate of avascular necrosis (AVN). The etiology of AVN seems to be multifactorial, although it is not thoroughly known. The aims of our study were to determine the rate of AVN after an unstable SCFE and to investigate the risk factors for AVN, specifically evaluating the notion of an "unsafe window", during which medical interventions would increase the risk for AVN.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 60 patients with an unstable SCFE diagnosed between 1985 and 2014. Timing of surgery was evaluated for three time periods, from acute onset of symptoms to surgery: period I, <24 h; period II, between 24 h and 7 days; and period III, >7 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for AVN.

RESULTS

Closed reduction and pinning was performed in 43 patients and in situ pinning in 17. Among these cases, 16 patients (27%) developed AVN. The rate of AVN was significantly higher in patients treated by closed reduction and pinning (15/43, 35%) than in those treated by in situ pinning (1/17, 5.9%) (p = 0.022). In patients treated by closed reduction and pinning, the incidence of AVN was 2/11 (18%) in period I, 10/13 (77%) in period II and 3/15 (20%) in period III, showing the significantly higher rate in period II (p = 0.002). The surgery provided in period II was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of AVN.

CONCLUSIONS

Our rate of AVN was 27% using two classical treatment methods. Time-to-surgery, between 24 h and 7 days, was independently associated with AVN, supporting the possible existence of an "unsafe window" in patients with unstable SCFE treated by closed reduction and pinning.

Long-term outcomes of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with in situ pinning

PURPOSE

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the commonest hip disorder in adolescents. In situ pinning is commonly performed, yet lately there has been an increase in procedures with open reduction and internal fixation. These procedures, however, are technically demanding with relatively high complication rates and unknown long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, reports on long-term results of in situ fixation are not equivocal. This study evaluates the possible higher risk of worse outcome after in situ pinning of SCFE.

METHODS

All patients treated for SCFE with in situ fixation between 1980 and 2002 in four different hospitals were asked to participate. Patients were divided into three groups, based on severity of the slip. Patients were invited to the outpatient clinic for physical examination and X-rays, and to fill out the questionnaires HOOS, EQ5D, and SF36. ANOVA and chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences between groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with 78 slips filled out the questionnaires. Patients with severe slips had worse scores on HOOS, EQ5D, and SF36. 75 % of patients with severe slips had severe osteoarthritis, compared to 2 % of mild and 11 % of moderate slips.

CONCLUSION

Hips with mild and moderate SCFE generally had good functional and radiological outcome at a mean follow-up of 18 years, and for these hips there seems to be no indication for open procedures. However, severe slips have a significantly worse outcome, and open reduction and internal fixation could therefore be considered.

Controversies in management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

The traditional treatment of the hip with a slip of the capital femoral epiphysis has been an in situ fixation using a single screw. This has the sanctity of a long term result. Recent literature stresses the outcomes of failure to restore the upper femoral alignment and on the basis of the poor results makes a plea for capital realignment. This being a recent development, it lacks the support of long term follow up and it remains to be seen if this is a better alternative of managing displaced and unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. The authors look at some of the available literature on the subject to highlight these controversies and their implications for orthopedic surgeons. Other controversies pertain to contralateral fixation, duration of immobilization and amount of weight bearing after an in situ fixation.

Modified Dunn osteotomy using an anterior approach used to treat 26 cases of SCFE

INTRODUCTION

Osteotomy performed below the femoral neck plays a leading role in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). It results in anatomical reduction. Several modifications have been made to Dunn's original osteotomy technique. We have developed another modification to this technique that uses an anterior surgical approach on a traction table with fluoroscopy control.

HYPOTHESES

Will this technique help to reduce the number of complications? Will its results be superior to those achieved with the standard Dunn osteotomy procedure?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study of 26 cases in 24 patients (2 bilateral cases). Patients were positioned supine on a traction table with fluoroscopy control. An anterior surgical approach was used. A trapezoid-shaped osteotomy was performed below the femoral head. The head's reduction was checked on the fluoroscope and the fixation confirmed. The Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score was used for the clinical assessment. The radiographic assessment was based on Southwick's angle.

RESULTS

The mean slip angle of the femoral head was 57°. A mean correction of 47° was achieved. Based on the PMA score, good and excellent results were achieved in 20 cases (77%) and poor results occurred in 6 cases (23%). The surgical treatment had a significant effect on the PMA score (P=0.0008). In terms of complications, there were five cases of chondrolysis and one case of necrosis associated with chondrolysis.

DISCUSSION

The anterior approach provides direct access to the femoral neck, and thereby a cautious osteotomy at the site of the slip itself. Use of a traction table makes the external manipulations, reduction and fixation procedures easier to carry out. The results of this study were comparable to published results.

LEVEL OF PROOF

IV, retrospective treatment study.

Current concepts in management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common hip condition that can be disabling. In this review, we provide an orientation on current trends in the clinical management of SCFE including conventional procedures and specialised surgical developments. Different methods of fixation of the epiphysis, risks of complications, and the rationale of addressing deformity, primarily or secondarily, are presented. Although improved understanding of the anatomy, vascularity and implications of residual deformity have changed management strategies, the best modality of treatment that would restore complete vascularity to the femoral head and prevent any residual deformity, impingement and early osteoarthritis remains elusive.