Acute complications associated with removal of flexible intramedullary femoral rods placed for pediatric femoral shaft fractures

Cast or Nail? Using a Preference-Based Tool for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fracture Treatment

BACKGROUND

Femoral shaft fractures are common injuries in children 2 to 7 years of age, with treatments ranging from casting to flexible intramedullary nails (FIN). Each treatment has unique attributes and outcomes are overall similar. Given equivalent outcomes, we hypothesized that a shared decision-making process, using adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA), can be used to assess individual family situations to determine ultimate treatment choice.

METHODS

An interactive survey incorporating an ACA exercise to elicit the preferences of individuals was created. Amazon Mechanical Turk was used to recruit survey respondents simulating the at-risk population. Basic demographic information and family characteristics were collected. Sawtooth Software was utilized to generate relative importance values of five treatment attributes and determine subjects' ultimate treatment choice. Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare relative importance between groups.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 186 subjects with 147 (79%) choosing casting as their ultimate treatment choice, while 39 (21%) chose FIN. Need for second surgery had the highest overall average relative importance (42.0), followed by a chance of serious complications (24.6), time away from school (12.9), effort required by caregivers (11.0), and return to activities (9.6). Most respondents (85%) indicated the generated relative importance of attributes aligned "very well or well" with their preferences. For those who chose casting instead of FIN, the need for secondary surgery (43.9 vs. 34.8, P<0.001) and the chance of serious complications (25.9 vs. 19.6, P<0.001) were the most important factors. In addition, returning to activities, the burden to caregivers, and time away from school were all significantly more important to those choosing surgery versus casting (12.6 vs. 8.7 P<0.001, 12.6 vs. 9.8 P=0.014, 16.6 vs. 11.7 P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our decision-making tool accurately identified subjects' treatment preferences and appropriately aligned them with a treatment decision. Given the increased emphasis on shared decision-making in health care, this tool may have the potential to improve shared decision-making and family understanding, leading to improved satisfaction rates and overall outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-III.

Treatment of Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures

Diaphyseal femur fractures are common in pediatric orthopaedic settings. A patient-specific treatment plan incorporates several factors, including age, weight, fracture pattern, associated injuries, and social considerations. Nonaccidental trauma should be considered in children younger than 3 years. In general, young children are treated with noninvasive immobilization (Pavlik harness or early hip spica casting) while school-aged children are treated with internal fixation. Internal fixation options include flexible intramedullary nails, rigid locked intramedullary nails, and plate osteosynthesis. Flexible intramedullary nails have the best outcomes in children of appropriate weight, aged 5 to 11 years, with stable fracture patterns. Lateral-entry rigid intramedullary nails have been designed for use in older children. External fixation is usually reserved for complex scenarios. Regarding all treatment methods, surgeons should be aware of several technical factors necessary to optimize outcomes.

Current Status and Outlook of Temporary Implants (Magnesium/Zinc) in Cardiovascular Applications

Medical application materials must meet multiple requirements, and the designed material must mimic the structure, shape. and support the formation of the replacing tissue. Magnesium (Mg) and Zinc alloys (Zn), as a “smart” biodegradable material and as “the green engineering material in the 21st century”, have become an outstanding implant material due to their natural degradability, smart biocompatibility, and desirable mechanical properties. Magnesium and Zinc are recognized as the next generation of cardiovascular stents and bioresorbable scaffolds. At the same time, improving the properties and corrosion resistance of these alloys is an urgent challenge. particularly to promote the application of magnesium alloys. A relatively fast deterioration rate of magnesium-based materials generally results in premature mechanical integrity compromise and local hydrogen build-up, resulting in restricted applicability. This review article aims to give a comprehensive comparison between Zn-based alloys and Mg-based alloys, focusing primarily on degradation and biocompatibility for cardiovascular applications. The recent clinical trials using these biodegradable metals have also been addressed.

Indications for and Risks Associated With Implant Removal After Pediatric Trauma

A wide range of implants are used in the treatment of pediatric fractures, including wires, plates, screws, flexible rods, rigid rods, and external fixation devices. Pediatric bones differ from adult bones both mechanically and biologically, including the potential for remodeling. Implants used in pediatric trauma patients present a unique set of circumstances regarding indications, risks, timing of implant removal, weight-bearing restrictions, and long-term sequelae. Indications for implant removal include wire/pin fixation, when substantial growth remains, and infection. When considering implant removal, the risks and benefits must be assessed. The primary risk of implant removal is refracture. The timing of implant removal varies widely from several weeks to a year or more with the option of retention depending on the fracture, type of implant, and skeletal maturity of the patient.

Outcomes of Hardware Removal Surgery for Children

Hardware removal is among the most common orthopedic procedures performed in the United States. The goal of this study was to report the outcomes of deep hardware removal for children. This study received institutional review board approval. Patients younger than 18 years who underwent deep hardware removal between 2007 and 2017 were studied. We reviewed 227 procedures involving 132 boys and 95 girls. Mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 14-36 months). Mean age at the time of surgery was 12.8 years (range, 2-17 years). Mean time from initial surgery to hardware removal was 8.4 months (range, 1-72 months). Of the 227 cases, 75 used a tourniquet. Mean tourniquet time was 30.1 minutes (range, 1-118 minutes). Mean length of surgery was 44.0 minutes (range, 4-173 minutes). Mean resident level performing the surgery was postgraduate year 3 (range, postgraduate year 2 to fellow). There were 3 complications. Locations of the implanted hardware included: femur, 85; humerus, 49; tibia, 46; hip/pelvis, 17; ulna, 11; miscellaneous foot, 10; radius, 6; and fibula, 3. Indications for surgery included surgeon recommendations in 122 cases; symptomatic hardware in 68 cases, and parent wishes in 37 cases. Hardware removal for children was safe, and the outcomes were excellent. Complications of hardware removal at a teaching hospital can be minimized when a more senior resident is the primary surgeon. Despite the challenging and historically troublesome nature of deep hardware removal, the current study shows that hardware removal for children is safe and effective. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):e91-e95.].

Implant removal associated complications after ESIN osteosynthesis in pediatric fractures

PURPOSE

ESIN (elastic stable intramedullary nailing) is considered the gold standard for various pediatric fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and type of complications during or after TEN (titanium elastic nail) removal.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis was performed. Metal removal associated complications and preoperative extraosseous length/outlet angle of TENs as possible causes of complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The complication rate in 384 TEN removals was 3.1% (n = 12). One major complication (rupture of M. extensor pollicis brevis) was documented. One refracture at the forearm occurred, however, remodeling prior TEN removal was completed. Ten minor complications were temporary or without irreversible restrictions (3 infections, 5 scaring/granuloma, 2 temporary paraesthesia). In 38 cases (16 forearms, 10 femora, 9 humeri, 3 lower legs), intra-operative fluoroscopy had to be used to locate the implants. In patients with forearm fractures, extraosseous implant length was relatively shorter than in cases without fluoroscopy (p = 0.01), but outlet angle of TENs was not significantly different in these two groups (28.5° vs 25.6°). In patients with femur fractures, extraosseous implant length and outlet angle were tendentially shorter, respectively, lower, but this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Removal of TENs after ESIN is a safe procedure with a low complication rate. Technically inaccurate TEN implantation makes removal more difficult and complicated. To prevent an untimely removal and patient discomfort, nail ends must be exactly positioned and cut. Intraoperative complications may be minimized with removal of TENs before signs of overgrowth.

EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective.

Treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures in children aged 2-10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review current literature on treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures in children of 2-10 years old, with subgroup analysis of children aged 2-6 years, comparing intramedullary nailing (IMN) to conservative treatment modalities.

METHODS

We included clinical trials and observational studies that compared traction and subsequent casting (TSC), spica casting and IMN for treatment of femur shaft fractures in children of 2-10 years of age. Subgroup analysis of children aged 2-6 years was performed.

RESULTS

Compared to treatment with immediate spica casting, IMN led to significantly less coronal angulation (mean difference (MD): 2.03 degrees, confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.90), less sagittal angulation (MD: 1.59 degrees, CI 0.82-2.35) and lower rates of LLD (Risk difference (RD): 0.07, CI 0.03-0.11). In terms of rehabilitation, IMN leaded to shorter time until walking with aids (MD: 31.53 days, CI 16.02-47.03), shorter time until independent ambulation (MD: 26.59 days, CI 22.07, 31.11) and shorter time until full weight bearing (MD: 27.05 days, CI 6.11, 47,99). Compared to TSC, IMN led to a lower rate of malunion (RD: 0.31, CI 0.05-0.56), shorter hospital stays (MD: 12.48 days, CI 11.57, 13.39), time until walking with aids (MD: 54.55, CI 40.05-69.04) and full weight bearing (MD: 27.05 days [6.11, 47,99]).

CONCLUSION

Although a lack of quality evidence, this systematic review showed a clear tendency to treatment with elastic intramedullary nails of femoral shaft fractures in children of 2-10 years of age.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Spica Casting Results in More Unplanned Reoperations than Elastic Intramedullary Nailing: A National Analysis of Femur Fractures in the Preschool Population

Background:

Spica casting and elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) are treatment options for femur fractures in preschool-age children. Clinical practice guidelines are only of moderate or limited strength, which may lead to variation in practice. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision surgery rate in young children undergoing these procedures.

Methods:

The Pediatric Health Information System, a database of 49 children hospitals, was queried for patients aged 3 to 6 years undergoing spica casting or ESIN for a diaphyseal femur fracture. ESIN removal was not considered an unplanned revision surgery because the indication for removal could not be determined in the database. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate regression.

Results:

Analysis included 4,059 subjects with a mean age of 3.9 ± 1.1 years. Unplanned revision surgery was done in 227/2,878 children (8%) with a spica cast and 35/1,181 (3%) of those with ESIN (P < 0.01). Approximately 2% of children in each cohort underwent ESIN or open reduction and internal fixation as a revision procedure (P = 0.35). In multivariate analysis, spica casting resulted in 4.4 times higher odds of unplanned revision surgery than ESIN (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9–6.7; P < 0.01). In the spica cast cohort, each year of increasing age resulted in 1.3 times higher odds of revision surgery (95% CI, 1.1–1.6; P < 0.01). Children who were aged 5 or 6 years at the time of spica casting had 1.9 times higher odds of requiring a subsequent procedure compared with 3- and 4-year-olds (95% CI, 1.3–2.7; P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

In this large, nationally representative cohort, spica casting resulted in higher odds of requiring an unplanned revision surgery than ESIN, when nail removal was not included as an unplanned procedure. Spica casting in 5- and 6-year-olds yielded higher odds of revision surgery. Regardless of whether spica casting or ESIN is chosen as the initial treatment, 2% of patients will subsequently undergo ESIN or open reduction and internal fixation as a revision procedure.

Financial Analysis of Closed Femur Fractures in 3- to 6-Year-Olds Treated With Immediate Spica Casting Versus Intramedullary Fixation

BACKGROUND

Health care in America continues to place more importance on providing value-based medicine. Medicare reimbursements are increasingly being tied to this and future policy changes are expected to reinforce these trends. Recent literature has shown pediatric femur fractures in preschool-age children have equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes when treated with spica casting or flexible intramedullary nails (IMN). We compared hospital care statistics including charges for nonoperative versus operative treatment for closed femur fractures in 3- to 6-year-olds.

METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed of 73 consecutive 3- to 6-year-olds treated at a regional level 1 pediatric hospital from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013 with an isolated, closed femoral shaft fracture. Exclusion criteria included open fractures, bilateral injury, and polytrauma. Immediate spica casting was performed in the Emergency Department or Anesthesia Procedure Unit versus IMN in the operating room.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were treated with spica casting and 32 patients were treated operatively with flexible IMNs; 3 patients failed nonoperative care. After analysis of final treatment groups, significant differences included age at injury: 3.7 years for cast versus 5.3 years for IMN (P<0.001), time to discharge 21 versus 41 hours (P<0.001), 3.2 versus 4.4 clinic visits (P<0.001), follow-up 3.5 versus 9.4 months (P<0.001). Orthopedic surgeon charges were $1500 for casted patients versus $5500 for IMN (P<0.001). Total hospital charges were $19,200 for cast versus $59,700 for IMN (P<0.001). No difference was found between clinic charges or number of radiographs between groups. In total, 76% of cast group were discharged <24 hours from admission versus 8.6% in operative group. In the operative group, 83% had implant removal with no statistically significant charge difference between those who had implant removal versus retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of pediatric femur fractures in 3- to 6-year-olds with IMN is associated with longer hospital stays, significantly greater hospital charges, longer follow-up and more clinic visits compared with spica casting. These findings are at odds with previous literature showing shorter hospital stays and decreased cost with nailing compared to traction and casting. This shows a clear difference between 2 treatments that yield similar clinical and radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Pediatric Orthopedic Trauma: An Evidence-Based Approach

The management of pediatric fractures has evolved over the past several decades, and many injuries that were previously being managed nonoperatively are now being treated surgically. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed clinical guidelines to help guide decision making and streamline patient care for certain injuries, but many topics remain controversial. This article analyzes the evidence regarding management of 5 of the most common and controversial injuries in pediatric orthopedics today.

Intramedullary Nailing Compared with Spica Casts for Isolated Femoral Fractures in Four and Five-Year-Old Children

BACKGROUND

Flexible intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a valuable tool in the treatment of femoral fractures in school-age children, whereas spica cast immobilization has been the standard of care for younger children. We compared these treatment modalities in a group of preschool-age children (four to five years of age).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients, four to five years of age, with an isolated, complete femoral shaft or subtrochanteric fracture treated with intramedullary nailing or early spica cast immobilization and followed until fracture-healing were identified from two centers. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Statistical methods included chi-square and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two patients followed for a mean of thirty-two weeks were identified. One hundred and four patients underwent IMN and 158 patients were treated with immediate spica cast immobilization at the surgeon's discretion. The patients who underwent IMN were older than those who underwent spica cast immobilization (mean, 5.2 versus 4.7 years; p < 0.001), were heavier (mean, 21.5 versus 18.0 kg; p < 0.001), and were more likely to have a higher-energy mechanism of injury (p = 0.025). At the time of final follow-up, there was no difference between groups with regard to the percentages of patients who had acceptable coronal angulation (≤15°), sagittal angulation (≤20°), and early fracture shortening (≤20 mm) (96.2% in the spica group versus 99.0% in the IMN group; p = 0.09). While there was no significant difference in the percentages who had an unplanned return to the operating room (3.8% in the IMN group versus 4.4% in the spica group; p > 0.99), the patients in the IMN group had more clinic visits (mean, 5.8 versus 4.0; p < 0.001) and longer follow-up (mean, forty-four versus twenty-five weeks; p < 0.001) than the patients in the spica group and a higher percentage of them underwent repeat procedures (89.4% versus 5.1%; p < 0.001), primarily for elective implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Preschool-age children (four to five years old) with an isolated femoral fracture have similar clinical and radiographic outcomes regardless of whether they are treated with immediate spica cast immobilization or IMN.

[Femoral shaft fractures in children under 3 years old. Current treatment standard]

INTRODUCTION

Femoral shaft fractures in children are a common injury. Operative treatment is recommended for children above 3 years of age. The question of this investigation was the current clinical standard for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children under 3 years old.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An e-mail questionnaire was sent to all clinics and hospital departments of the members of the German Society for Trauma Surgery and the German Society of Pediatric Surgery.

RESULTS

Out of 775 clinics and departments, 121 participated in the survey (16 %). From 2011 to 2012 overall 756 femoral shaft fractures of children 3 years and younger were treated of which 375 (50 %) were stabilized with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), 183 (24 %) with an overhead extension, 178 (23 %) with a plaster cast and 9 (1 %) with external fixation. Finally, operative treatment was used in 51 % compared to 49 % with conservative treatment.

DISCUSSION

Obviously, operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children younger than 3 years is routinely used despite the fact that there is no evidential basis for this approach. There are good arguments for and against operative and conservative forms of treatment. Indications for operative treatment include multiple trauma, open fractures, body weight over 20 kg, child already free walking and lack of stable fixation with conservative treatment. To achieve more evidence for the existing recommendation of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Working Group of the Scientific Medical Specialist Societies), further investigations are needed.

Sclerosing osteomyelitis as a complication of pediatric femur fracture fixation

Complications of flexible nailing of pediatric femur fractures include angular and rotational malunions, leg-length discrepancy, and, in rare instances, infection. To our knowledge, the development of a sclerosing type of chronic osteomyelitis, which appears most similar to chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis of Garre', has not been reported as a complication of, or associated with, flexible nail fixation of a pediatric femur fracture.

Implant removal in children

PURPOSE

Implant removal in children is still a standard procedure. Implants may disturb function, and some theoretical long-term risks like growth disturbance, foreign body reaction, chronic infection and corrosion are used as arguments for removal. Implant migration or interference with any other orthopaedic treatment over the later course of life is also a matter of debate. On the other hand, the difficulty in removing single implants as well as possible perioperative complications has induced discussion about the retention of implants in childhood.

METHODS

The current procedures are exposed and the available literature on implant removal in children reviewed.

RESULTS

Actually, a clear recommendation does not exist. The current line of action still includes routine removal, as it is preferred by some authors, whereas others argue for a selective procedure. K-wires as well as intramedullary nails are usually removed because the ends may interfere with the surrounding tissue. Screws and plates can be retained if there are no local problems. The removal of external fixators is non-controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits have to outweigh the risks and complications in the individual case and the procedure should not require a more extensive procedure than insertion. It has to be an individual decision in view of the lack of evidence to support routine removal as well as to refute it.