Association Between Social Determinants of Health and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Single-Level Lumbar Fusions: A Matched Analysis

Predictive Value of Social Determinants of Health on 90-Day Readmission and Health Utilization Following ACDF: A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost, Random Forest, Elastic-Net, SVR, and Deep Learning

Study DesignRetrospective cohort.ObjectiveDespite numerous studies highlighting patient comorbidities and surgical factors in postoperative success, the role of social determinants of health (SDH) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) outcomes remains unexplored. This study evaluates the predictive impact of SDH on 90-day readmission and health utilization (HU) in ACDF patients using machine learning (ML).MethodsWe analyzed 3127 ACDF patients (2003-2023) from a multisite academic center, incorporating over 35 clinical and demographic variables. SDH characteristics were assessed using the Social Vulnerability Index. Primary outcomes included 90-day readmission and postoperative HU. ML models were developed and validated by the area under the curve (AUC) for readmission and mean absolute error (MAE) for HU. Feature importance analysis identified key predictors.ResultsBalanced Random Forest (AUC = 0.75) best predicted 90-day readmission, with length of stay, Elixhauser score, and Medicare status as top predictors. Among SDH factors, minority status & language, household composition & disability, socioeconomic status, and housing type & transportation were influential. Support Vector Regression (MAE = 1.96) best predicted HU, with perioperative duration, socioeconomic status, and minority status & language as key predictors.ConclusionsFindings highlight SDH's role in ACDF outcomes, suggesting the value of stratifying for interventions such as targeted resource allocation, language-concordant care, and tailored follow-up. While reliance on a single healthcare system and proxy SDH measures are limitations, this is the first study to apply ML to assess SDH in ACDF patients. Further validation with direct patient-reported SDH data is needed to refine predictive models.

A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the correlation between social health and mindsets, comfort, and capability could aid the design of individualized care models. However, currently available social health checklists are relatively lengthy, burdensome, and designed for descriptive screening purposes rather than quantitative assessment for clinical research, patient monitoring, or quality improvement. Alternatives such as area deprivation index are prone to overgeneralization, lack depth in regard to personal circumstances, and evolve rapidly with gentrification. To fill this void, we aimed to identify the underlying themes of social health and develop a new, personalized and quantitative social health measure.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What underlying themes of social health (factors) among a subset of items derived from available legacy checklists and questionnaires can be identified and quantified using a brief social health measure? (2) How much of the variation in levels of discomfort, capability, general health, feelings of distress, and unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms is accounted for by quantified social health?

METHODS

In this two-stage, cross-sectional study among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care in an urban area in the United States, all English and Spanish literate adults (ages 18 to 89 years) were invited to participate in two separate cohorts to help develop a provisional new measure of quantified social health. In a first stage (December 2021 to August 2022) , 291 patients rated a subset of items derived from commonly used social health checklists and questionnaires (Tool for Health and Resilience in Vulnerable Environments [THRIVE]; Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks and Experiences [PRAPARE]; and Accountable Health Communities Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool [HRSN]), of whom 95% (275 of 291; 57% women; mean ± SD age 49 ± 16 years; 51% White, 33% Hispanic; 21% Spanish speaking; 38% completed high school or less) completed all items required to perform factor analysis and were included. Given that so few patients decline participation (estimated at < 5%), we did not track them. We then randomly parsed participants into (1) a learning cohort (69% [189 of 275]) used to identify underlying themes of social health and develop a new measure of quantified social health using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and (2) a validation cohort (31% [86 of 275]) used to test and internally validate the findings on data not used in its development. During the validation process, we found inconsistencies in the correlations of quantified social health with levels of discomfort and capability between the learning and validation cohort that could not be resolved or explained despite various sensitivity analyses. We therefore identified an additional cohort of 356 eligible patients (February 2023 to June 2023) to complete a new extended subset of items directed at financial security and social support (5 items from the initial stage and 11 new items derived from the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, Financial Well-Being Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, and 6-item Social Support Questionnaire, and "I have to work multiple jobs in order to finance my life" was self-created), of whom 95% (338 of 356; 53% women; mean ± SD age 48 ± 16 years; 38% White, 48% Hispanic; 31% Spanish speaking; 47% completed high school or less) completed all items required to perform factor analysis and were included. We repeated factor analysis to identify the underlying themes of social health and then applied item response theory-based graded response modeling to identify the items that were best able to measure differences in social health (high item discrimination) with the lowest possible floor and ceiling effects (proportion of participants with lowest or highest possible score, respectively; a range of different item difficulties). We also assessed the CFA factor loadings (correlation of an individual item with the identified factor) and modification indices (parameters that suggest whether specific changes to the model would improve model fit appreciably). We then iteratively removed items based on low factor loadings (< 0.4, generally regarded as threshold for items to be considered stable) and high modification indices until model fit in CFA was acceptable (root mean square of error approximation [RMSEA] < 0.05). We then assessed local dependencies among the remaining items (strong relationships between items unrelated to the underlying factor) using Yen Q3 and aimed to combine only items with local dependencies of < 0.25. Because we exhausted our set of items, we were not able to address all local dependencies. Among the remaining items, we then repeated CFA to assess model fit (RMSEA) and used Cronbach alpha to assess internal consistency (the extent to which different subsets of the included items would provide the same measurement outcomes). We performed a differential item functioning analysis to assess whether certain items are rated discordantly based on differences in self-reported age, gender, race, or level of education, which can introduce bias. Last, we assessed the correlations of the new quantified social health measure with various self-reported sociodemographic characteristics (external validity) as well as level of discomfort, capability, general health, and mental health (clinical relevance) using bivariate and multivariable linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

We identified two factors representing financial security (11 items) and social support (5 items). After removing problematic items based on our prespecified protocol, we selected 5 items to address financial security (including "I am concerned that the money I have or will save won't last") and 4 items to address social support (including "There is a special person who is around when I am in need"). The selected items of the new quantified social health measure (Social Health Scale [SHS]) displayed good model fit in CFA (RMSEA 0.046, confirming adequate factor structure) and good internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.80 to 0.84), although there were some remaining local dependencies that could not be resolved by removing items because we exhausted our set of items. We found that more disadvantaged quantitative social health was moderately associated with various sociodemographic characteristics (self-reported Black race [regression coefficient (RC) 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29 to 4.9)], divorced [RC 2.5 (95% CI 0.23 to 4.8)], unemployed [RC 1.7 (95% CI 0.023 to 3.4)], uninsured [RC 3.5 (95% CI 0.33 to 6.7)], and earning less than USD 75,000 per year [RC 2.7 (95% CI 0.020 to 5.4) to 6.8 (95% CI 4.3 to 9.3)]), slightly with higher levels of discomfort (RC 0.055 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.093]), slightly with lower levels of capability (RC -0.19 [95% CI -0.34 to -0.035]), slightly with worse general health (RC 0.13 [95% CI 0.069 to 0.18]), moderately with higher levels of unhelpful thoughts (RC 0.17 [95% CI 0.13 to 0.22]), and moderately with greater feelings of distress (RC 0.23 [95% CI 0.19 to 0.28]).

CONCLUSION

A quantitative measure of social health with domains of financial security and social support had acceptable psychometric properties and seems clinically relevant given the associations with levels of discomfort, capability, and general health. It is important to mention that people with disadvantaged social health should not be further disadvantaged by using a quantitative measure of social health to screen or cherry pick in contexts of incentivized or mandated reporting, which could worsen inequities in access and care. Rather, one should consider disadvantaged social health and its associated stressors as one of several previously less considered and potentially modifiable aspects of comprehensive musculoskeletal health.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A personalized, quantitative measure of social health would be useful to better capture and understand the role of social health in comprehensive musculoskeletal specialty care. The SHS can be used to measure the distinct contribution of social health to various aspects of musculoskeletal health to inform development of personalized, whole-person care pathways. Clinicians may also use the SHS to identify and monitor patients with disadvantaged social circumstances. This line of inquiry may benefit from additional research including a larger number of items focused on a broader range of social health to further develop the SHS.

Development of a patient decision aid for people with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease considering lumbar fusion: A mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVES

To develop and user-test a patient decision aid providing evidence-based information for people with chronic low back pain (LBP) and degenerative disc disease considering lumbar fusion.

DESIGN

Convergent parallel mixed methods study.

SETTING

A prototype patient decision aid was developed, guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria, a multidisciplinary steering committee, and insights from previous studies. Participants were recruited via social media and the authors' collaborative networks to refine and evaluate the decision aid.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals who underwent lumbar fusion for chronic LBP and health professionals who manage these patients were purposively sampled.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback and assess the decision aid's acceptability, usability, and preparedness for decision-making. Framework analysis was used for interview data and descriptive analysis for questionnaires.

RESULTS

Sixteen clinicians (5 physiotherapists, 2 rheumatologists, 2 surgeons, 7 general practitioners) and seven patients participated, most rating the prototype's acceptability as 'excellent' or 'good'. Usability (mean [SD], health professionals: 78 [16], patients: 72 [8]) and preparedness for decision-making (health professionals: 73 [14], patients: 72 [10]) also scored highly. However, some viewed the prototype as biased against lumbar fusion, and suggestions to include more personalised information were made.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that our prototype patient decision aid is acceptable, useful, and prepares patients to make informed decisions about spinal fusion for chronic LBP and degenerative disc disease. Future studies will assess the clinical impact of our decision aid and its optimal distribution timing.

Impact of Race and Social Determinants on Operative Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Medicare Patients

Background

Operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in high-demand patients may provide functional benefit, particularly in the setting of significant displacement. Whether social determinants of health (SDOH) and race impact treatment remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adverse SDOH modifiers and race are independent predictors of surgical intervention for DRF.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Medicare Standard Analytical Files of the PearlDiver database of patients with a DRF from 2007 to 2016. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to observe whether race and adverse SDOH variables were independent predictors of undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) within 3 weeks of a new diagnosis of DRF after controlling for age and fracture type.

Results

The average patient age was 76.3 years. A total of 10,697 (13.1%) patients underwent ORIF. Patients who underwent ORIF were less likely to have negative economic and social modifiers of SDOH and had lower odds of being non-White. Patients who underwent surgery also had higher odds of being younger, White, female, and having a type III open fracture.

Conclusions

In the Medicare population, non-White race and adverse economic and social modifiers of SDOH were independent predictors of undergoing nonoperative treatment of DRF after controlling for age and fracture type. Future studies are needed to further elucidate the nuanced effects of race and SDOH on the management of DRFs.

The Association Between Social Determinants of Health and Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if adverse social determinants of health (SDOH) are associated with differential complication rates following surgical fixation of distal radius fractures and assess which SDOH domain (economic, educational, social, health care, or environmental) is most associated with postoperative complications.

METHODS

Using a national administrative claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing open treatment for an isolated distal radius fracture between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified based on the presence/absence of at least one SDOH code and propensity score matched to create two cohorts balanced by age, sex (male or female), insurance type, and comorbidities. Social determinants of health examined included economic, educational, social, health care, and environmental factors. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the isolated effect of SDOH on 90-day and 1-year complication rates.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, 57,025 patients in the adverse SDOH cohort and 57,025 patients in the control cohort were included. Patients facing an adverse SDOH were significantly more likely to experience 90-day complications, including emergency department visits (Odds ratio (OR): 3.18 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.07-3.29]), infection (OR: 2.37 [95% CI: 2.12-2.66]), wound dehiscence (OR: 2.06 [95% CI: 1.72-2.49]), and 1-year complications, including complex regional pain syndrome (OR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.15-1.58]), malunion/nonunion (OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.08-1.29]), and hardware removal (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 1.07-1.20]). Additionally, patients facing an adverse SDOH had a significantly increased risk of 90-day complications, regardless of fracture severity, and patients with economic and social challenges had the highest odds of both 90-day and 1-year postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Social determinants of health are associated with increased complications following distal radius fracture fixation, even when controlling for demographic and clinical factors. We recommend routine screening for adverse SDOH and inclusion of SDOH data into health records to not only inform quality improvement initiatives and risk adjustment for outcome-based quality measurements but also to allow providers to begin to discuss and address such barriers during the perioperative period.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis II.

Association of socioeconomic vulnerability with clinical and financial outcomes following emergent hernia repair

BACKGROUND

While race and insurance have been linked with greater likelihood of hernia incarceration and emergent presentation, the association of broader social determinants of health (SDOH) with outcomes following urgent repair remains to be elucidated.

STUDY DESIGN

All adult hospitalizations entailing emergent repair for strangulated inguinal, femoral, and ventral hernias were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Socioeconomic vulnerability was ascertained using relevant diagnosis codes. Multivariable models were developed to consider the independent associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and study outcomes.

RESULTS

Of ∼236,215 patients, 20,306 (8.6 ​%) were Vulnerable. Following risk-adjustment, socioeconomic vulnerability remained associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality, any perioperative complication, increased hospitalization expenditures and higher risk of non-elective readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing emergent hernia repair, socioeconomic vulnerability was linked with greater morbidity, expenditures, and readmission. As part of patient-centered care, novel screening, postoperative management, and SDOH-informed discharge planning programs are needed to mitigate disparities in outcomes.

Social Determinants of Health Disparities Increase 5-Year Revision Rates but Not Postoperative Complications After Primary Hip Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) disparities on 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, 90-day postoperative complications, and 5-year secondary surgery rates after primary hip arthroscopy using a large national database.

METHODS

A national administrative claims database was used to identify patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with femoroplasty, acetabuloplasty, and/or labral repair between 2015 and 2022. Queries were performed to identify patients who experienced any SDOH disparities, including economic, educational, environmental, or social disparities; those experiencing SDOH disparities within 1 year prior to primary hip arthroscopy were matched 1:1 by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, diabetes, obesity, and tobacco use to patients not experiencing any lifetime SDOH disparities. The odds of 90-day complications and 30-day ED visits were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Rates of 5-year revision hip arthroscopy and of any secondary surgery (revision hip arthroscopy or total hip arthroplasty) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3,383 primary hip arthroscopy patients who experienced SDOH disparities were matched 1:1 to a control cohort of 3,383 patients who did not experience SDOH disparities (age of 41.0 years and 79.6% female sex in both cohorts). The odds of adverse events after arthroscopy were low and did not differ between the SDOH cohort (1.51%) and no-SDOH cohort (1.57%, P = .09). Additionally, there was no difference in the odds of 30-day ED visits between the SDOH cohort (5.65%) and no-SDOH cohort (4.79%, P = .10). The rate of 5-year revision hip arthroscopy was significantly greater among patients experiencing SDOH disparities (5.4% vs 4.1%, P = .02); however, there was no difference in the rate of any secondary surgery between cohorts (11.8% vs 10.4%, P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experiencing SDOH disparities had similar odds of postoperative complications and ED visits after primary hip arthroscopy but greater rates of 5-year revision hip arthroscopy compared with a matched-control cohort of patients not experiencing SDOH disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Association of socioeconomic vulnerability with outcomes after emergency general surgery

PURPOSE

Social determinants of health are increasingly recognized to shape health outcomes. Yet, the effect of socioeconomic vulnerability on outcomes after emergency general surgery remains under-studied.

METHODS

All adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for emergency general surgery operations (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, laparotomy, large bowel resection, perforated ulcer repair, or small bowel resection), within 2 days of non-elective admission were tabulated in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Socioeconomic vulnerability was defined using relevant diagnosis codes and comprised economic, educational, healthcare, environmental, and social needs. Patients demonstrating socioeconomic vulnerability were considered Vulnerable (others: Non-Vulnerable). Multivariable models were constructed to evaluate the independent associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and key outcomes.

RESULTS

Of ∼1,788,942 patients, 177,764 (9.9%) were considered Vulnerable. Compared to Non-Vulnerable, Vulnerable patients were older (67 [55-77] vs 58 years [41-70), P < .001), more often insured by Medicaid (16.4 vs 12.7%, P < .001), and had a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (4 [3-5] vs 2 [1-3], P < .001). After risk adjustment and with Non-Vulnerable as a reference, Vulnerable remained linked with a greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.64, confidence interval 1.58-1.70) and any perioperative complication (adjusted odds ratio 2.02, confidence interval 1.98-2.06). Vulnerable also experienced a greater duration of stay (β+4.64 days, confidence interval +4.54-4.74) and hospitalization costs (β+$1,360, confidence interval +980-1,740). Further, the Vulnerable cohort demonstrated increased odds of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 2.44, confidence interval 2.38-2.50) and non-elective readmission within 30 days of discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, confidence interval 1.26-1.32).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic vulnerability is independently associated with greater morbidity, resource use, and readmission after emergency general surgery. Novel interventions are needed to build hospital screening and care pathways to improve disparities in outcomes.

Living with a C2-Sacrum Spinal Fusion: Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients Fused from C2 to the Sacrum

STUDY DESIGN

Single center, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the surgical outcomes and quality of life in patients with C2-sacrum posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Though it is thought to be a "final" construct, it remains unknown how patients fare postoperatively. We sought to evaluate the surgical outcomes and quality of life of patients after C2-sacrum PSF.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing C2-Sacrum PSF from 2015-2020 by 4 surgeons at a single institution were included. The study time period for each patient began after their index operation that led to the C2-sacrum fusion. Dates of surgery, complications, reoperations, patient reported outcomes (PROs) including EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaires, and activities of daily living (ADL) questions were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, student t-tests, and linear regression were used.

RESULTS

Of the 23 patients who underwent C2-sacrum PSF, 6 patients (26%) required a total of 10 reoperations after a mean of 1.5 years (range 0-4 years) after C2-sacrum PSF. Five reoperations were for mechanical failure; 3 for wound complications/infection; and 2 for instrumentation and spinous process prominence. PROs were collected on 18 patients with mean follow-up of 2.4 years (range .5-4.5) after their C2-sacrum PSF. At 6-months, both SRS-22 and ODI scores improved significantly after C2-sacrum PSF (SRS: 57.5 to 76.3, P = .0014; ODI: 47.0 to 31.7, P = .013). Similarly, at a mean 2.4 years postoperatively, mean ODI improved significantly (47.0 to 30.4, P = .0032). Six patients (33%) had minimal symptoms (ODI <20). The median postoperative EQ-5D score was .74 (range .19 to 1.0), which compares favorably to patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis (EQ-5D .63) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (EQ-5D .69) and hypertension (HTN). In terms of activities of daily living (ADL), 10 patients (56%) exercised regularly-a mean 4.5 days/week. 11 (61%) could do light aerobic activity (e.g. stationary bike). 10 (55%) were able to play with children/grandchildren as desired. Eight patients (44%) hiked, and 2 (11%) drove independently. 11 (61%) could tolerate short air-travel comfortably. Of the 17 patients who could toilet and perform basic hygiene preoperatively, 16 (94%) were able to do so postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Though C2-sacrum PSF is thought to be a "final" construct, approximately 1 in 4 patients require subsequent operations. However, C2-sacrum PSF patients had a significant improvement in SRS and ODI scores by 6 months postop. Over 60% of patients were regularly performing light aerobic activity 2 years after their C2-sacrum PSF. EQ-5D suggests that this population fares better than those with degenerative hip/knee arthritis and similarly to those with common chronic conditions like DM and HTN.

The impact of social determinants of health on early outcomes after adult Chiari surgery

We sought to identify social determinants of health (SDoH) for adult patients undergoing Chiari decompression surgery and to analyze their association with postoperative outcomes, including length of stay (LOS), return to the system within 30 days, and the Chicago Chiari Outcomes Score (CCOS). This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent Chiari decompression surgery between June 2021 and January 2023. Data was gathered through electronic medical record review and telephone surveys. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate demographics of all patients meeting inclusion criteria. Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression were used for data analysis. A total of 37 patients underwent Chiari decompression (23 CCOS/SDoH survey respondents): 48% bony decompression only, 30% bony decompression plus intradural exploration, and 22% occipitocervical fusion. Seven patients (30%) had a LOS > 2 days, 1 patient (4%) required inpatient rehabilitation postoperatively, 4 patients (17%) returned to the system within 30 days, 10 patients (43%) had an extremely favorable CCOS (15-16), and 11 patients (48%) reported interaction with a Chiari support group. Mean follow-up was 9.5 months. Patients with occipitocervical fusion were more likely to have a LOS > 2 days (p = 0.03), patients who exercised ≥ 3 days per week were more likely to have a favorable CCOS (p = 0.04), and patients who participated in a Chiari support group were less likely to have a favorable CCOS (p = 0.03). Chiari decompression plus occipitocervical fusion may be associated with increased LOS. While more frequent exercise may be associated with better post-surgical outcomes, participation in a Chiari support group may be correlated with worse outcomes.

Social determinants of health disparities impact postoperative complications in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Understanding the role of social determinants of health disparities (SDHDs) in surgical outcomes can better prepare providers to improve postoperative care. In this study, we use International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify SDHDs and investigate the risk of postoperative complication rates among patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national insurance claims database. Using ICD and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, patients who underwent primary TSA with at least 2 years of follow-up in the database were identified. Patients with a history of SDHDs were identified using appropriate ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Patients were grouped in one of 2 cohorts: (1) patients with no history of SDHDs (control) and (2) patients with a history of SDHDs (SDHD group) prior to TSA. The SDHD and control groups were matched 1:1 for comorbidities and demographics prior to conducting multivariable analysis for 90-day medical complications and 2-year surgical complications.

RESULTS

After matching, there were 8023 patients in the SDHD group and 8023 patients in the control group. The SDHD group had significantly higher odds for 90-day medical complications including heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infection. Additionally, the SDHD group had significantly higher odds for revision surgery within 2 years following TSA. Patients in the SDHD group also had a significantly longer length of hospital stay following TSA.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the association between SDHDs and postoperative complications following TSA. Quantifying the risk of complications and differences in length of stay for TSA patients with a history of SDHDs is important in determining value-based payment models and risk stratifying to optimize patient care.

Socioeconomic Influence on Cervical Fusion Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes following cervical fusion based on socioeconomic status (SES) variables including race, education, net worth, and homeownership status.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have demonstrated the effects of patient race and income on outcomes following cervical fusion procedures. However, no study to date has comprehensively examined the impact of multiple SES variables. We hypothesized that race, education, net worth, and homeownership influence important outcomes following cervical fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database was queried for patients undergoing first-time inpatient cervical fusion from 2003 to 2021. Patient demographics, SES variables, and the Charlson comorbidity index were obtained. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay and 30-day rates of reoperation, readmission, and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included postoperative emergency room visits, discharge status, and total hospital charges.

RESULTS

A total of 111,914 patients underwent cervical spinal fusion from 2003 to 2021. Multivariate analysis revealed that after controlling for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index, Black race was associated with a higher rate of 30-day readmissions [odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20]. Lower net worth (vs. >$500K) and renting (vs. owning a home) were significantly associated with both higher rates of 30-day readmissions (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.17-1.41; OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.49), and emergency room visits (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18-1.42; OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23). Lower net worth (vs. >$500K) was also associated with increased complications (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31).

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic variables, including patient race, education, and net worth, influence postoperative metrics in cervical spinal fusion surgery. Future studies should focus on developing and implementing targeted interventions based on patient SES to reduce disparity.

Social Determinants of Health and Preoperative Care

Preoperative care exists as part of perioperative continuum during which anesthesiologists and surgeons optimize patients for surgery. These multispecialty efforts are important, particularly for patients with complex medical histories and those requiring major surgery. Preoperative care improves planning and determines the clinical pathway and discharge disposition. The role of nonmedical social factors in the preoperative planning is not well described in anesthesiology. Research to improve outcomes based on social factors is not well described for anesthesiologists but could be instrumental in decreasing disparities and advancing health equity in surgical patients.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture

BACKGROUND

Disparities in social determinants of health (SDH) have been shown to play an increasingly important role in the equitable delivery of health care. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common upper-extremity injuries encountered. This study aims to examine the influence of economic, educational, social, environmental, and healthcare disparities on management of these injuries.

METHODS

PearlDiver Mariner insurance claims database was analyzed for treatment patterns of DRF in patients aged 18 to 65 years based on the presence or absence of social determinants of health disparities (SDHDs). Outcome variables included the primary mode of management of DRF, including operative versus non-operative, as well as concomitant procedures. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare fracture management modality in patients with and without SDHDs.

RESULTS

Of 161 704 patients identified with DRF, 38.3% had at least 1 reported SDHD. The majority of SDHDs were economic. Patients identified with 1 or more SDHDs had a higher medical comorbidity index. Patients with environmental SDHD were more likely to receive non-operative management. Within any SDHD and economic subgroups, odds of operative management were higher. No relationship was identified between SDHD and concomitant procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of environmental disparities in SDH may predispose patients disproportionately to non-operative management. The presence of SDHDs may influence medical decision-making in favor of open reduction and internal fixation in patients with DRF treated operatively. In treating at-risk populations, providers should be aware of the potential for implicit bias associated with SDHDs and prioritize shared decision-making between patients and physicians.

Association Between Race and Short-Term Outcomes Across 3988 Consecutive Single-Level Spinal Fusions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Race has implications for access to medical care. However, the impact of race, after access to care has been attained, remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to isolate the relationship between race and short-term outcomes across patients undergoing a single, common neurosurgical procedure.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 3988 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only open lumbar fusion at a single, multihospital, academic medical center were enrolled over a 6-year period. Among them, 3406 patients self-identified as White, and 582 patients self-identified as Black. Outcome disparities between all White patients vs all Black patients were estimated using logistic regression. Subsequently, coarsened exact matching controlled for outcome-mitigating factors; White and Black patients were exact-matched 1:1 on key demographic and health characteristics (matched n = 1018). Primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, mortality, discharge disposition, and intraoperative complication.

RESULTS

Before matching, Black patients experienced increased rate of nonhome discharge, readmissions, ED visits, and reoperations (all P < .001). After exact matching, Black patients were less likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio [OR] 2.68, P < .001) and had higher risk of 30-day and 90-day readmissions (OR 2.24, P < .001; OR 1.91, P < .001; respectively) and ED visits (OR 1.79, P = .017; OR 2.09, P < .001). Black patients did not experience greater risk of intraoperative complication (unintentional durotomy).

CONCLUSION

Between otherwise homogenous spinal fusion cohorts, Black patients experienced unfavorable short-term outcomes. These disparities were not explained by differences in intraoperative complications. Further investigation must characterize and mitigate institutional and societal factors that contribute to outcome disparities.

Association of area deprivation index (ADI) with demographics and postoperative outcomes in pediatric brain tumor patients

PURPOSE

Although social determinants of health (SDOH) have been associated with adverse surgical outcomes, cumulative effects of multiple SDOH have never been studied. The area deprivation index (ADI) assesses cumulative impact of SDOH factors on outcomes. We analyzed the relationship between ADI percentile and postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients diagnosed with brain tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted on our consecutive series of pediatric brain tumor patients presenting between January 1, 1999, and May 31, 2022. Demographics and outcomes were collected, identifying SDOH factors influencing outcomes found in the literature. ADI percentiles were identified based on patient addresses, and patients were stratified into more (ADI 0-72%) and less (ADI 73-100%) disadvantaged cohorts. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were completed for demographics and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients were included. Demographics occurring frequently in the more disadvantaged group were Black race (13.1% vs. 2.8%; P = .003), public insurance (51.5% vs. 27.5%; P < .001), lower median household income ($64,689 ± $19,254 vs. $46,976 ± $13,751; P < .001), and higher WHO grade lesions (15[11.5%] grade III and 8[6.2%] grade IV vs. 8[5.6%] grade III and 5[3.5%] grade IV; P = .11). The more disadvantaged group required adjunctive chemotherapy (25.4% vs. 12.05%; P = .007) or radiation therapy (23.9% vs. 12.7%; P = .03) more frequently and had significantly greater odds of needing adjunctive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.22; P = .03) in a multivariate model, which also identified higher WHO tumor grades at presentation (OR, 1.20; CI, 1.14-1.27; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

These findings are promising for use of ADI to represent potential SDOH disadvantages that pediatric patients may face throughout treatment. Future studies should pursue large multicenter collaborations to validate these findings.

Social Determinants of Health Disparities Increase the Rate of Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated whether social determinants of health disparities (SDHD), which include economic, social, education, health care, and environmental factors, identified through International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are associated with increased odds for poor health outcomes. We aimed to investigate the association between SDHD, identified through this novel methodology, as well as postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Using a national insurance claims database, a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. Patients were selected using Current Procedural Terminology and ICD codes for primary TKA between 2010 and 2019. Patients were stratified into 2 groups using ICD codes, those who had SDHD and those who did not, and propensity matched 1:1 for age, sex, a comorbidity score, and other comorbidities. After matching, 207,844 patients were included, with 103,922 patients in each cohort. Odds ratios (ORs) for 90-day medical and 2-year surgical complications were obtained using multivariable logistical regressions.

RESULTS

In patients who have SDHD, multivariable analysis demonstrated higher odds of readmission (OR): 1.12; P = .013) and major and minor medical complications (OR: 2.09; P < .001) within 90-days as well as higher odds of revision surgery (OR: 1.77; P < .001) and periprosthetic joint infection (OR: 1.30; P < .001) within 2-years.

CONCLUSION

The SDHD are an independent risk factor for revision surgery and periprosthetic joint infection after TKA. In addition, SDHD is also an independent risk factor for all-cause hospital readmissions and both minor and major complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Social determinants of health and race are independent predictors of reduced rotator cuff surgery rates in the Medicare population

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities have been shown to influence rates of surgery for patients with rotator cuff disease. Some individuals have attributed adverse social determinants of health (SDOHs) as potential confounders of this relationship between race and surgery rate. However, there is a paucity of literature observing whether adverse SDOHs and race independently influence rotator cuff surgery rates. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether adverse SDOHs and race are independent predictors of rotator cuff surgery rates for Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducting using the Medicare Standard Analytic Files (SAF) data set of the PearlDiver database, observing 211,340 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to observe whether race and adverse SDOHs were independent variables associated with rotator cuff surgery rates. To determine whether adverse SDOHs significantly influenced racial disparities, stratified analyses of patients with ≥1 adverse SDOH and those without adverse SDOHs were conducted to compare the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of racial disparities.

RESULTS

Among patients with rotator cuff disease, 21,679 (10.26%) were of nonwhite race and 21,835 (10.33%) had ≥1 adverse SDOH. The variables of nonwhite race (OR, 0.622; 95% CI, 0.599-0.668; P < .001) and having ≥1 adverse SDOH (OR, 0.715; 95% CI, 0.501-0.814; P < .001) were independent predictors of not undergoing surgery. On stratified analysis, there was no significant difference in racial disparities in patients with ≥1 adverse SDOH (OR, 0.620; 95% CI, 0.440-0.875) and those without adverse SDOHs (0.635; 95% CI, 0.601-0.671) based on overlapping 95% CIs.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that among Medicare beneficiaries, adverse SDOHs and race are independent predictors of lower rotator cuff surgery rates, emphasizing the need to address disparities based on race alone.

Racial/ethnic and income-based differences in the use of surgery for cervical and lumbar disorders in New York State: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The extent to which use of spine surgeries for patients with cervical and lumbar disorders varies by their race/ethnicity and income is currently unknown.

PURPOSE

To assess racial/ethnic and income-based differences in use of spine surgery in New York State (NYS) from 2016 to 2019.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational analysis using 2016 to 2019 New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) data, direct standardization, and multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models.

METHODS

A dataset of patients who underwent surgery for cervical and spinal disorders in NYS in the period 2016 to 2019 was used to determine county-level age- and sex-standardized annual cervical and lumbar surgery rates expressed as number of surgeries per 10,000 individuals. Further sub-analysis was performed with the key independent variables being the combination of individual-level race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic individuals) and income (low-/high-income residing in zip codes below/above state median income); and year. We estimated multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models which controlled county-level variables to determine the adjusted rates of spine surgeries for patients belonging to various race/ethnicity and income group combinations.

RESULTS

The study included 29,650 and 42,498 patients in the cervical and lumbar cohorts, respectively. In 2019, the county-level mean cervical and lumbar surgery rates were 3.88 and 5.19 surgeries per 10,000 individuals, respectively. There was a five-fold rate variation across NYS. In 2019, the adjusted cervical rates were 4.59 (White low-income), 4.96 (White high-income), 7.20 (Black low-income), 3.01 (Black high-income), 4.37 (Hispanic low-income), and 1.17 (Hispanic high-income). The adjusted lumbar rates were 5.49 (White low-income), 6.31 (White high-income), 9.43 (Black low-income), 2.47 (Black high-income), 4.22 (Hispanic low-income), and 2.02 (Hispanic high-income). The rates for low-income Black or Hispanic patients were significantly higher than their high-income counterparts. Low-income Black patients had the highest rates. Over the study period, the gap/difference increased significantly between high-income Hispanic and White individuals by 2.19 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.27, -0.10, p=.04) for cervical surgery; and between low-income Black and White individuals by 2.82 (2.82, 95% CI: 0.59, 5.06, p=.01) for lumbar surgery.

CONCLUSION

There are differences in the rates of spine surgery in New York State, among identifiable groups. Black individuals from poorer zip codes experience relatively higher spine surgery rates. Understanding the drivers of surgical rate variation is key to improving the equitable delivery of spine care. A better understanding of such rate variations could inform health policy.

Postoperative Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naive Cannabis Users Following Single-Level Lumbar Fusions

BACKGROUND

As the literature grows on opioid use, the impact of simultaneous cannabis use has hitherto been mostly unexplored. In this study, we assessed the effects of cannabis use on postoperative opioid utilization in opioid-naive patients undergoing single level fusions of the lumbar spine.

METHODS

Using an all-payer claims database, the medical records of 91 million patients were analyzed to identify patients who had undergone single level lumbar fusions between January 2010 and October 2020. Rates of opioid utilization at 6 months following index procedure (morphine milligram equivalents/day), the development of opioid use disorder (OUD), and the rates of opioid overuse were assessed.

RESULTS

Following examination of 87,958 patient records, 454 patients were matched and distributed equally into cannabis user and noncannabis user cohorts. At 6 months following index procedure, cannabis users were equal to nonusers in their rates of prescribed opioid utilization (49.78%, P > 0.99). Cannabis users used smaller daily dosages compared to nonusers (51.1 ± 35.05 vs. 59.72 ± 41, P = 0.003). On the other hand, the proportion of patients diagnosed with OUD was found to be significantly higher among patients using cannabis (18.94% vs. 3.96%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to noncannabis users, opioid-naive patients who are cannabis users undergoing lumbar spinal fusions are at a higher risk of developing opioid dependence following surgery, despite having decreased daily dosages of opioids overall. Further studies should explore the factors associated with the development of OUD and the details of concurrent marijuana use to effectively treat pain while limiting the potential for abuse.

Impact of social determinants of health on perioperative opioid utilization in patients with lumbar degeneration

Background

Social determinants of health (SDOH), have been demonstrated to significantly impact health outcomes in spine patients. There may be interaction between opioid use and these factors in spine surgical patients. We aimed to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOH) which are associated with perioperative opioid use among lumbar spine patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar degeneration in 2019. Opioid use was determined based on prescription records from the electronic medical records. Preoperative opioid users (OU) were compared with opioid-naïve patients regarding SDOH including demographics like age and race, and clinical data such as activity and tobacco use. Demographics and surgical data, including age, comorbidities, surgical invasiveness, and other variables were also collected from the records. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis of these factors.

Results

Ninety-eight patients were opioid-naïve and 90 used opioids preoperatively. All OU had ≥3 months of use, had more prior spine surgeries (1.07 vs. 0.44, p<.001) and more comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and depression (p=.021, 0.043, 0.017). Patients from lower community median income areas, unemployed, or with lower physical capacity (METS<5) were more likely to use opioids preoperatively. Postoperative opioid use was strongly associated with preoperative opioid use, as well as alcohol use, and lower community median income. At one year postoperatively, OU had higher rates of opioid use [72.2% vs. 15.3%, p<.001].

Conclusions

Unemployment, low physical activity level, and lower community median income were associated with preoperative opioid use and longer-term opioid use postoperatively.

Economic and educational disparities are associated with an increased risk of revision surgery following shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is limited literature exploring how nonmedical factors such as social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review of the Pearl Diver Database was used to capture patients undergoing either primary anatomic total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the third quarter of 2019 with at least 1 year of active longitudinal follow-up. Patients with proximal humeral fractures, stress fractures, or septic arthritis were excluded. The included patients were then divided into 2 cohorts based on the presence of current SDOHs or a history of SDOHs. The SDOH cohort comprised 4 non-mutually exclusive categories: economic, educational, social, and environmental disparities. Subsequently, a control cohort was matched at a 1:1 ratio to the SDOH cohort. Primary outcome measures were assessed using a logistic regression and consisted of the following 90-day postoperative complications: minor and major medical complications and infection. Emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions for any cause were also assessed. Additionally, the following 1-year outcomes were assessed: aseptic loosening, instability, and revision arthroplasty. Surgical costs and 90-day postoperative costs were collected using averaged insurance reimbursements for both the control and SDOH cohorts.

RESULTS

There were 5190 patients in each cohort. Economic disparities made up the largest portion of the SDOH cohort (n = 4631, 89.2%), followed by social (n = 741, 14.3%), environmental (n = 417, 8.0%), and educational (n = 99, 1.9%) disparities. Compared with the control cohort, SDOHs were associated with an increased risk of major complications (2.3% vs. 1.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.87; P < .001), minor complications (5.7% vs. 3.8%; OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.21-1.95; P = .001), readmissions (4.3% vs. 2.8%; OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.84; P < .001), and ED visits (15.2% vs. 11.0%; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.63; P < .001) within 90 days following surgery. Additionally, SDOHs were associated with an increased risk of aseptic loosening (1.1% vs. 0.6%; OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20-2.65; P = .006), instability (4.0% vs. 2.2%; OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43-2.28; P < .001), and ipsilateral revision (9.2% vs. 7.6%; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43; P < .001) at 1 year postoperatively compared with the control cohort.

CONCLUSION

SDOHs are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty including revision surgery, ED visits, length of stay, and overall cost compared with matched controls without SDOHs. Specifically, economic and educational disparities are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes following surgery including revision surgery, ED visits, length of stay, and overall cost.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Shunted Hydrocephalus

BACKGROUND

Social risk factors have been shown to negatively affect health outcomes in children. However, this has not been characterized regarding pediatric shunted hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of social risk factors on outcomes in pediatric shunted hydrocephalus with the goal of identifying specific areas of intervention that might improve the outcomes of children undergoing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion.

METHODS

In an all-payer administrative database, records between January 2010 and October 2020 were analyzed to identify children undergoing CSF shunting procedures. Children with social risk factors were compared with those without regarding rates of infection, shunt-related interventions, and mortality within 5 years of their shunting procedure.

RESULTS

Among the 5420 children who underwent first-time shunting procedures, 263 (4.9%) were identified to have social risk factors. Children with identified social risk factors had increased odds of central nervous system infection (odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% CI 1.45-2.91), revision (OR 2.43, 95% I 1.89-3.12), and mortality (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.23-5.72). The mean numbers of computed tomography studies (14.60 ± 17.78 vs 6.34 ± 6.10), MRI studies (18.76 ± 24.37 vs 7.88 ± 24.37), and shunt series X-rays (17.22 ± 19.04 vs 7.66 ± 8.54) were increased among children with social risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Children with social risk factors had increased rates of central nervous system infection, shunt-related interventions, and mortality within 5 years of CSF shunting. We underscore the importance of characterizing the impact of social risk factors in specific conditions, such as pediatric shunted hydrocephalus, and look to future directions aimed to mitigate these risk factors with coordination and direction of individualized resources, encouragement of advocacy, and community partnership.

The Effect of Social Deprivation on Fracture-Healing and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

Social deprivation is a state marked by limited access to resources due to poverty, discrimination, or other marginalizing factors. We investigated the links between social deprivation and orthopaedic trauma, including patient-reported outcomes, radiographic healing, and complication rates following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 229 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures at our Level-I trauma center. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated proxy for social deprivation, was used to group patients into the most deprived tercile (MDT), the intermediate deprived tercile (IDT), and the least deprived tercile (LDT) for outcome comparison. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was used to measure the domains of Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Anxiety, and Depression, and radiographic healing was assessed with the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) system.

RESULTS

On univariate analyses, patients from the MDT reported worse PF, PI, Anxiety, and Depression scores than those from the LDT within the first year of postoperative follow-up. On multivariable regression analysis, PROMIS score outcomes were influenced by age, race, and smoking status, but not by social deprivation tercile. Furthermore, residing in the MDT was associated with a 31% increase in time to radiographic union compared with the LDT (β = 0.27; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures, social deprivation is associated with slower fracture-healing and potentially influences short-term PROMIS scores. These results warrant further investigation in additional patient populations with orthopaedic trauma and highlight the importance of developing interventions to reduce inequities faced by patients from low-resource settings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Social determinants of health and the prediction of 90-day mortality among brain tumor patients

OBJECTIVE

Within the neurosurgical oncology literature, the effect of structural and socioeconomic factors on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. In this study, the authors quantified the effects of social determinant of health (SDOH) disparities on hospital complications, length of stay (LOS), nonroutine discharge, 90-day readmission, and 90-day mortality following brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of brain tumor patients who had undergone resection at a single institution in 2017-2019. The prevalence of SDOH disparities among patients was tracked using International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Revisions (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. Bivariate (Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test) and multivariate (logistic and linear) regressions revealed whether there was an independent relationship between SDOH status and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The patient cohort included 2519 patients (mean age 55.27 ± 15.14 years), 187 (7.4%) of whom experienced at least one SDOH disparity. Patients who experienced an SDOH disparity were significantly more likely to be female (OR 1.36, p = 0.048), Black (OR 1.91, p < 0.001), and unmarried (OR 1.55, p = 0.0049). Patients who experienced SDOH disparities also had significantly higher 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) scores (p < 0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes (p = 0.0012). Experiencing an SDOH disparity was associated with a significantly longer hospital LOS (p = 0.0036), greater odds of a nonroutine discharge (OR 1.64, p = 0.0092), and greater odds of 90-day mortality (OR 2.82, p = 0.0016) in the bivariate analysis. When controlling for patient demographics, tumor diagnosis, mFI-5 score, ASA class, surgery number, and SDOH status, SDOHs independently predicted hospital LOS (coefficient = 1.22, p = 0.016) and increased odds of 90-day mortality (OR 2.12, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

SDOH disparities independently predicted a prolonged hospital LOS and 90-day mortality in brain tumor patients. Working to address these disparities offers a new avenue through which to reduce patient morbidity and mortality following brain tumor surgery.

Social Determinants of Health Disparities are Associated with Increased Costs, Revisions, and Infection in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to use a national claims database to assess the impact of pre-existing social determinants of health disparities (SDHD) on postoperative outcomes following rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the Mariner Claims Database was used to capture patients undergoing primary RCR with at least 1 year of follow-up. These patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of a current or previous history of SDHD, encompassing educational, environmental, social, or economic disparities. Records were queried for 90-day postoperative complications, consisting of minor and major medical complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, stiffness, and 1-year ipsilateral revision surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the impact of SDHD on the assessed postoperative outcomes following RCR.

RESULTS

58,748 patients undergoing primary RCR with a SDHD diagnosis and 58,748 patients in the matched control group were included. A previous diagnosis of SDHD was associated with an increased risk of ED visits (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.18-1.27; P < .001), postoperative stiffness (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.42-2.64; P < .001), and revision surgery (OR 2.35, 95% CI 2.13-2.59; P < .001) compared to the matched control group. Subgroup analysis revealed educational disparities had the greatest risk for 1-year revision (OR 3.13, 95% CI 2.53-4.05; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a SDHD was associated with an increased risk of revision surgery, postoperative stiffness, emergency room visits, medical complications, and surgical costs following arthroscopic RCR. Overall, economic and educational SDHD were associated with the greatest risk of 1-year revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

National Evaluation of Social Determinants of Health in Orthopedic Fracture Care: Decreased Social Determinants of Health Is Associated With Increased Adverse Complications After Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To assess the individual impact of social determinants of health disparities (SDHD) on surgical outcomes following orthopaedic trauma surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

SETTING

Mariner Claims Database.

PATIENTS

Inclusion criteria were patients 18-85 years of age, undergoing surgery for hip fractures or ankle fractures from 2010 to 2018.

INTERVENTION

Patients were divided based on SDHD using International Classification of Diseases 9 and International Classification of Diseases 10 codes. Those with SDHD were propensity-score matched with those who did not have any disparities with respect to age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, tobacco use, and obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2).

OUTCOMES

Ninety-day major medical complications, infection, readmission, and revisions within 1 year.

RESULTS

Patients with educational deficiencies had increased rates of readmission and major complications compared with those without disparities following hip and ankle fracture management. Moreover, economic disparities were associated with an increased risk of readmission and revision following hip fracture surgery and infection and readmission following ankle fracture surgery.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the large impact of SDHD on patients' outcomes following surgery and the importance of proper follow-up interventions to optimize patient care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The influence of social determinants of health on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Methods of reducing complications in individuals electing to undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) rely upon understanding at-risk patient populations, among other factors. This study aims to investigate the interplay between social determinants of health (SDOH) and postoperative complication rates, length of stay, revision surgery, and rates of postoperative readmission at 30 and 90 days in individuals electing to have single-level ACDF.

METHODS

Using MARINER30, a database that contains claims information from all payers, patients were identified who underwent single-level ACDF between 2010 and 2019. Identification of patients experiencing disparities in 1 of 6 categories of SDOH was completed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 (International Classifications of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions) codes. The population was propensity matched into 2 cohorts based on comorbidity status: those with SDOH versus those without.

RESULTS

A total of 10,030 patients were analyzed; there were 5015 (50.0%) in each cohort. The rates of any postoperative complication (12.0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.001); pseudarthrosis (3.4% vs 2.6%, p = 0.017); instrumentation removal (1.8% vs 1.2%, p = 0.033); length of stay (2.54 ± 5.9 days vs 2.08 ± 5.07 days, p < 0.001 [mean ± SD]); and revision surgery (9.7% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001) were higher in the SDOH group compared to patients without SDOH, respectively. Patients with any SDOH had higher odds of perioperative complications (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.43-3.33), pseudarthrosis (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.06-1.68), revision surgery (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.04-2.85), and instrumentation removal (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.04-2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent single-level ACDF, there is an association between SDOH and higher complication rates, longer stay, increased need for instrumentation removal, and likelihood of revision surgery.

Social determinants of health and their impact on rates of postoperative complications among patients undergoing vertical sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Vertical sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most common bariatric procedures worldwide, but the impact of social determinants of health on postoperative outcomes for this procedure has not been well characterized. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact that social determinants of health have on postoperative outcomes after vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

METHOD

This was a population-based study using the MARINER-15 database, an all-payer claims database. The primary endpoint of this study was the development of any complication, including cardiac complication, acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis, wound complication, hematoma, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, transfusion, or urinary tract infection within 60 days, 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality, or readmission within 30 or 90 days in patients undergoing vertical sleeve gastrectomy procedures.

RESULTS

Individuals in the social determinants of health cohort had a significantly longer length of stay when compared with those without social determinants of health (3.07 days vs 1.582 days, P < .001). These patients were more likely to develop any complication within 60 days after surgery (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.40) but were less likely to return for readmission within 30 and 90 days (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.96; hazard ratio 0.85 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Vertical sleeve gastrectomy is an effective treatment for morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities. Although patients with social determinants of health are more likely to develop any of the analyzed postoperative complications within 60 days, they are less likely to return for readmission, highlighting the importance of focused follow-up and other measures to avoid lapses in care and eliminate further barriers to care in this population.