Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of 4857 screws

Pedicle Screw Placement in Pediatric and Adolescent Spinal Deformity Surgery: Does Tapping of the Pedicle Screw Tract Increase Safety?

INTRODUCTION

Since the development of pedicle screw fixation in the spine, safe placement has remained a crucial component in maximizing patient outcomes and mitigating pedicle screw-related complications. The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of pedicle tapping in identifying pedicle breaches.

METHODS

A pediatric spine surgery database was queried to identify a consecutive series of patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery utilizing pedicle screw fixation between May 2019 and October 2022. A "breached pedicle" was defined as a pedicle with intact walls after initial manual cannulation but found to have a breach upon probing after tapping 1 mm smaller than the planned screw diameter. The number of screws placed and breached was prospectively recorded, along with patient demographics and procedural data.

RESULTS

There were 288 patients (68% female) with a mean age of 14.3 years (range: 3.7 to 23.3). Diagnoses included idiopathic (129), neuromuscular (76), syndromic (38), congenital (23), kyphosis (9), spondylopathy (12), and trauma (1). The mean upper and lower instrumented vertebrae were T3 and L3, respectively, with an average of 1.4 posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) (range: 0 to 8). Posterior spinal fusion and segmental instrumentation (PSFSI) was the most common procedure (254 cases, 88%). Of 4796 attempted screw placements, 20 (0.4%) pedicles were breached: medial (17), lateral (1), inferior (1), and inferolateral (1). Fourteen screws were abandoned, 3 redirected, and 3 replaced by hooks. T1 (14.3%) and T6 (1.2%) had the highest breach rates. No associations were found between breached pedicles and age ( P =0.099), sex ( P =0.795), or PCOs ( P >0.05). Congenital scoliosis had the highest breach rate at 1.6%.

CONCLUSION

A total of 4796 pedicle screws were placed, with 1 of every 250 (0.4%) of pedicle screw insertions (n=20) having "breached pedicles" identified only after tapping. The technical step of pedicle screw tapping potentially mitigated the chance of a misplaced pedicle screw. Surgeons need to assess the value of this information in their surgical workflow and risk assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Screw Stimulation Thresholds for Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLLIF): A Correlational Study

INTRODUCTION

This study presents findings from an investigation into the correlation of neuromonitoring techniques in minimally invasive lumbar fusions and their open counterparts regarding acceptable thresholds for screw stimulation. The threshold for acceptable stimulation value for open surgery has been established. The study compared acceptable thresholds for open pedicle screws where there is more connection between the screw and the soft tissue.

METHODS

The neuromonitoring data of 17 patients who underwent oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) procedures between September 2023 to May 2024 were reviewed. Neuromonitoring was conducted throughout surgeries, recording stimulation thresholds for pedicle screws insulated and uninsulated, to simulate the environment of a screw during open and minimally invasive surgery respectively. Patients' BMI was also collected for potential correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Results indicate a discernible correlation between stimulation thresholds in open and minimally invasive surgeries, but no definitive correlation with BMI due to sample size limitations. Though a significant correlation between the two stimulating styles is apparent, there is a good correlation to suggest what threshold should determine a standard stimulation threshold for minimally invasive surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The study emphasizes the need for refined neuromonitoring strategies in minimally invasive spinal fusion (MISF) surgeries to ensure patient safety and surgical effectiveness. Further research with larger cohorts is recommended to establish optimized protocols that have a clearly defined amplitude for MISF thresholds.

Effectiveness of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in a Patient Undergoing a One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Report

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are common modes of operative treatment of lumbar radiculopathy and spondylolisthesis. An integral part of these procedures is the appropriate placement of pedicle screws to ensure proper fusion. Breach of the medial cortex during pedicle screw fixation can potentially cause permanent impairment for a patient; significant technology and resources have been universally devoted to preventing this complication. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is a frequently used tool by spine surgeons, which, along with fluoroscopy, is traditionally thought to reduce the incidence of neurologic injury. Unfortunately, IONM is not infallible and, in certain studies, has not been shown to decrease the risk of neurologic compromise. This case presentation details the clinical course of a 55-year-old who underwent an L4-5 TLIF. Despite benign electromyography recordings intraoperatively, the patient presented postoperatively with a new-onset left foot drop and a CT scan that confirmed bilateral L4 screw malposition with a breach of the medial cortex. We hope to further advance the discussion regarding the dangerous inconsistency of IONM in hopes of identifying a multimodal approach to avoid dreaded complications like this one in the future.

A Modified Method of Triggered Electromyography Monitoring in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Comparison to Conventional Techniques and Correlation with Body Mass Index

PURPOSE

Conventional triggered electromyography (EMG) in percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) systems may be unreliable due to the interaction between the insertion apparatus and patient's soft tissue. Our aim was 1) to describe a modified technique of triggered EMG monitoring using insulated Kirschner wire (K-wires), 2) to compare EMG potentials with conventional techniques, and 3) to demonstrate the relationship between patient body mass index (BMI) and triggered EMG potentials.

METHODS

This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 50 patients undergoing minimally invasive PPS placement. Triggered EMG measurements using K-wires before and after insulation were compared. The difference between EMG measurements before and after insulation was correlated with patient BMI.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients, 22 females and 28 males, underwent triggered EMG testing using K-wires prior to final PPS placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine for a total of 472 triggered EMG measurements. When compared to standard triggered EMG monitoring, insulated triggered EMG monitoring demonstrated an average 55.4% decrease in EMG values (P < 0.001). Increasing BMI correlated to increasing % decrease in EMG values (r-coefficient, 0.376; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a cost-effective, efficient, and reliable technique for triggered EMG during PPS placement which may help ensure accurate screw placement and minimize potentially devastating complications.

Robotic-assisted spine surgery allows for increased pedicle screw sizes while still improving safety as indicated by elevated triggered electromyographic thresholds

The present study used triggered electromyographic (EMG) testing as a tool to determine the safety of pedicle screw placement. In this Institutional Review Board exempt review, data from 151 consecutive patients (100 robotic; 51 non-robotic) who had undergone instrumented spinal fusion surgery of the thoracic, lumbar, or sacral regions were analyzed. The sizes of implanted pedicle screws and EMG threshold data were compared between screws that were placed immediately before and after adoption of the robotic technique. The robotic group had significantly larger screws inserted that were wider (7 ± 0.7 vs 6.5 ± 0.3 mm; p < 0.001) and longer (47.8 ± 6.4 vs 45.7 ± 4.3 mm; p < 0.001). The robotic group also had significantly higher stimulation thresholds (34.0 ± 11.9 vs 30.2 ± 9.8 mA; p = 0.002) of the inserted screws. The robotic group stayed in the hospital postoperatively for fewer days (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.9 ± 2 days; p = 0.04), but had longer surgery times (174 ± 37.8 vs 146 ± 41.5 min; p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that the use of navigated, robot-assisted surgery allowed for placement of larger pedicle screws without compromising safety, as determined by pedicle screw stimulation thresholds. Future studies should investigate whether these effects become even stronger in a later cohort after surgeons have more experience with the robotic technique. It should also be evaluated whether the larger screw sizes allowed by the robotic technology actually translate into improved long-term clinical outcomes.

A practical method for real-time detection of pedicle wall breaching during funneling

BACKGROUND

A reliable, real-time method for the detection of pedicle wall breaching during funnelling in spine deformity surgery could be accessible to any surgeon assisted with neuromonitoring.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients (1066 pedicles), who were submitted to spinal deformity surgery from December 2013 to July 2015 were included in the study group. A control group of 13 consecutive patients (226 pedicles) with spinal deformity surgery were operated on from January to December 2013 and were excluded from finder stimulation. In the study cohort, continuous stimulation during funnelling was delivered via a finder and subsequently a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) threshold was determined. Following funnelling, manual inspection of the pedicular internal walls was performed. The CMAP thresholds were compared with the results of palpation to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the technique for detecting pedicular breaching. To cover common ranges of damage, the medial and lateral breaches were compared and the concave-apical breaches compared to the non-apical or convex-apical breaches. In addition, a pedicle screw test was estimated for all patients.

RESULTS

ROC analysis showed 9 mA cut-off to have a sensitivity of 88.0% and a specificity of 89.5% for predicting pedicular breaching, with an area under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.90-0.94; P < 0.001). Using 9 mA threshold as an alert criterion, funnelling at the concave-apical pedicles showed significantly more true and false positive alerts and fewer true negative alerts when compared with the non-apical and convex-apical pedicles (P < 0.001). Medial breaches had significantly lower stimulation thresholds than lateral breaches (P < 0.001). Thresholds of screw-testing were significantly higher for study than for control-patients (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Finder stimulation has a considerably higher sensitivity and specificity for prediction of pedicular breaching, most prominent for medial breaches. Screw-testing displayed significantly better results in patients undergoing the finder stimulation technique, as compared with the control group. The main advantages of our method are its high safety level and low cost, which may be critical in less affluent countries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Threshold-based Monitoring of Compound Muscle Action Potentials for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbosacral Spine: Can We Rely on Stimulation of the Uninsulated Screw to Provide a Valid Safety Warning?

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To test if threshold-based monitoring of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) by stimulating the screw loaded to uninsulated extender sleeve provides a valid safety warning for percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placements in the lumbosacral spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Utility of the CMAP monitoring to PPS procedures remains controversial.

METHODS

A series of 202 patients underwent a total of 1664 lumbosacral PPS placements under CMAP monitoring without fluoroscopic guidance. The monitoring consisted of stimulating the PPS assembled to uninsulated extender sleeve and recording CMAPs from the vastus medialis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and medial gastrocnemius. Automated steps of a threshold hunting algorithm using 0.2-ms duration pulses of increasing intensities delivered at 2/s allowed quick determination of a minimum stimulation current to evoke >100-μV amplitude CMAPs.

RESULTS

At L2 through S1 spines, postoperative CT scans identified 51 medial or inferior pedicle wall breaches of 1536 screws (3.3%) without neurologic complications. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the critical cutoff threshold value of 27 mA (74% sensitivity and 95% specificity) for predicting 35 breaches of 627 screws (5.6%) at L2 and L3, and of 17 mA (100% sensitivity and 98% specificity) for 16 of 909 (1.8%) at L4 through S1. While advancing the screw, three breaches (5.9%) showed a particularly low threshold of ≤6-mA, allowing the surgeon to immediately redirect the screw and retest the new trajectory as safe.

CONCLUSION

Screw stimulation with threshold hunting algorithm has a distinct advantage over the time-consuming insulated pilot hole stimulation, allowing an uninterrupted flow of the surgery. The present findings have documented practical usefulness and reliability of CMAP monitoring using direct stimulation of the PPS assembled to uninsulated extender sleeve.

Transcranial Motor-evoked Potential Alert After Supine-to-Prone Position Change During Thoracic Ossification in Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) during supine-to-prone position change for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Supine-to-prone position change might be a risk of spinal cord injury in posterior decompression and fusion surgeries for T-OPLL.

METHODS

The subjects were 145 patients with T-OPLL surgically treated with posterior decompression and fusion using Tc-MEPs in 14 institutes. Tc-MEPs were monitored before surgery from supine-to-prone position and intraoperatively in seven institutes and only intraoperatively in the other seven institutes because of disapproval of the anesthesia department. In cases of Tc-MEP alert after position change, we adjusted the cervicothoracic posture. When the MEP did not recover, we reverted the position to supine and monitored the Tc-MEPs in supine position.

RESULTS

There were 83 and 62 patients with/without Tc-MEP before position change to prone (group A and B). The true-positive rate was lower in group A than group B, but without statistical significance (8.4% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.12). In group A, five patients who had Tc-MEP alert during supine-to-prone position change were all female and had larger body mass index values and upper thoracic lesions. Among the patients, three underwent surgeries after cervicothoracic alignment adjustment, and two had postponed operations to 1 week later with halo-vest fixation because of repeated Tc-MEP alerts during position change to prone. The Tc-MEP alert at exposure was statistically more frequent in group B than in group A ( P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Tc-MEP alert during position change is an important sign of spinal cord injury due to alignment change at the upper thoracic spine. Tc-MEP monitoring before supine-to-prone position change was necessary to prevent spinal cord injury in surgeries for T-OPLL.

Safe Electromyography Stimulation Thresholds Within Kambin's Triangle During Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND

Transforaminal endoscopic approaches through Kambin's triangle traditionally require surgery to be performed without general anesthesia to allow live patient feedback. No reliable intraoperative neuromonitoring method specific to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), the structure most at risk during this approach, currently exists.

OBJECTIVE

To correlate evoked electromyography (EMG) thresholds within Kambin's triangle with new postoperative pain or sensorimotor symptoms potentially resulting from DRG irritation.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under general anesthesia at a single institution. A stimulation probe was inserted into Kambin's triangle under fluoroscopic and robotic guidance, before passage of endoscopic instruments. EMG thresholds required to elicit corresponding myotomal responses were measured. Postoperatively, any potential manifestations of DRG irritation were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients underwent a total of 34 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion levels during the study period, with symptoms of potential DRG irritation occurring in 5. The incidence of new onset symptoms increased with lower stimulation thresholds. Sensitivities for EMG thresholds of ≤4, ≤8, and ≤11 mA were 0.6, 0.8, and 1, respectively. Corresponding specificities were 0.90, 0.69, and 0.55, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated for the first time the feasibility of direct intraoperative neuromonitoring within Kambin's triangle in transforaminal endoscopic surgery. Eight milliampere seems to be a reasonable compromise between sensitivity and specificity for this monitoring technique. In the future, larger-scale studies are required to refine safe stimulation thresholds.

Triggered Electromyography is a Useful Intraoperative Adjunct to Predict Postoperative Neurological Deficit Following Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Malposition of pedicle screws during instrumentation in the lumbar spine is associated with complications secondary to spinal cord or nerve root injury. Intraoperative triggered electromyographic monitoring (t-EMG) may be used during instrumentation for early detection of malposition. The association between lumbar pedicle screws stimulated at low EMG thresholds and postoperative neurological deficits, however, remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess whether a low threshold t-EMG response to lumbar pedicle screw stimulation can serve as a predictive tool for postoperative neurological deficit.

METHODS

The present study is a meta-analysis of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase identifying prospective/retrospective studies with outcomes of patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with t-EMG testing.

RESULTS

The total study cohort consisted of 2,236 patients and the total postoperative neurological deficit rate was 3.04%. 10.78% of the patients incurred at least 1 pedicle screw that was stimulated below the respective EMG alarm threshold intraoperatively. The incidence of postoperative neurological deficits in patients with a lumbar pedicle screw stimulated below EMG alarm threshold during placement was 13.28%, while only 1.80% in the patients without. The pooled DOR was 10.14. Sensitivity was 49% while specificity was 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrically activated lumbar pedicle screws resulting in low t-EMG alarm thresholds are highly specific but weakly sensitive for new postoperative neurological deficits. Patients with new postoperative neurological deficits after lumbar spine surgery were 10 times more likely to have had a lumbar pedicle screw stimulated at a low EMG threshold.

A systematic review with meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of pedicle screw electrical stimulation

PURPOSE

To provide a systematic review with meta-analysis providing evidence of the current diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of pedicle screw electrical stimulation.

METHODS

A systematic database search on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed according to the PRISMA-DTA guidelines, and eligibility criteria applied to reduce the results to: (1) only journal articles reporting electrical stimulation of the pedicle screw head, (2) screw position confirmation by imaging techniques, and (3) enough information allowing the calculation of a 2 × 2 contingency table. Sample characteristics, image confirmation method, electrical current threshold and stimulation results were retrieved and analyzed using according to appropriate DTA analysis methods, and allowing the calculation of specificity, sensitivity for pedicle screws insertion at the lumbar and thoracic levels.

RESULTS

Lumbar screw stimulation presents a higher sensitivity (0.586 [0.336, 0.798] and specificity (0.984 [0.958, 0.994]) than thoracic screws (sensitivity: 0.270 [0.096; 0.562]; specificity: 0.958 [0.931, 0.975]). The same is observed in terms of the diagnostic odds ratio for lumbar (88.32 [32.136, 242.962]) and thoracic (8.460 [2.139, 33.469]) levels. When performing a sub-group analysis, it is possible to divide the lumbar stimulation threshold as 8 and 10-12 mA, and the thoracic threshold as 6 and 9-12 mA. A threshold of 8 mA at the lumbar level provides higher sensitivity and specificity. Increasing the threshold results in higher specificity but not sensitivity. In fact, at the range of 10-12 mA, the diagnostic validity is too low to confer this technique any robust diagnostic validity. Similarly, at the thoracic level, lower threshold currents are associated with increased sensitivity, but their diagnostic validity is very low.

CONCLUSION

Electrical stimulation of the pedicle screw can be used as an adequate diagnostic capability at the lumbar level with a threshold of 8 mA. However, thoracic stimulation is currently not reliable, with very low sensitivity and diagnostic validity at 6 mA or higher.

The effect of hydroxyapatite on titanium pedicle screw resistance: an electrical model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intraoperative detection of a pedicle wall breach implicitly reduces surgical risk, but the reliability of intraoperative neuromonitoring has been contested. Hydroxyapatite (HA) has been promulgated to increase pedicle screw resistance and negatively influence the accuracy of electromyography.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this experiment is to evaluate the effect of HA on pedicle screw electrical resistance using a controlled laboratory model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Stimulation of pedicle screws was performed in normal saline (0.9% NaCl). The experimental group included 8 HA coated (HAC) pedicle screws and matched manufacturer control pedicle screws without HAC (Ti6Al4V). All screws were stimulated at 5, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-mm submersion depths. Circuit current return was recorded, and pedicle screw electrical resistance was calculated according to Ohm's Law. Data were assessed for normality and variance. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests compared groups with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Effect size is reported with 95% confidence intervals (95CI). p values <.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Current return was detected for all screws (N=24) following subclinical 8.5 µA stimulation at 5, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-mm submersion depths (N=144). The effect estimate of HA on pedicle screw electrical resistance is -0.07 (-0.17 to 0.01 95CI). The estimated effect of HA on pedicle screw electrical resistance did not differ across manufacturers. Electrical resistance values were inversely related to submersion depth. Electrical resistance values were lower in the experimental group at 10 mm (p=.04), 15 mm (p=.04), and 25 mm (p=.02) submersion depths. The HA effect ranged from -0.03 to -0.08 as submersion depth varied.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that HA increased pedicle screw electrical resistance in a matched manufacturer control laboratory model. Electrical stimulation of pedicle screws may be reliable for pedicle breach detection in the presence of HA. Future research should investigate if laboratory findings translate to clinical practice and confirm that electrical stimulation of pedicle screws is a reliable method to detect pedicle breach in the presence of HA.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring during surgery for lumbar stenosis

The indications for neuromonitoring during lumbar stenosis surgery are defined by the risks associated with patient positioning, the approach, decompression of neural elements, deformity correction, and instrument implantation. The routine use of EMG and SEP alone during lumbar stenosis surgery is no longer supported by the literature. Lateral approach neuromonitoring with EMG only is also suspect. Lumbar stenosis patients often present with multiple co-morbidities which put them at risk during routine pre-surgical positioning. Frequently encountered morbid obesity and/or diabetes mellitus may play a role in monitorable and preventable brachial plexopathy after "superman" positioning or femoral neuropathy from groin pressure after prone positioning, for example. Deformity correction in lumbar stenosis surgery often demands advanced implementation of multiple neuromonitoring modalities: EMG, SEP, and MEP. Because the bulbocavernosus reflex detects the function of the conus medullaris and sacral somato afferent/efferent fibers of the cauda equina, it may also be recorded. The recommendation to record pedicle screw thresholds has become more nuanced as surgeon dependence on 3D imaging, navigation, and robotics has increased. Neuromonitoring in lumbar stenosis surgery has been subject mainly to uncontrolled case series; prospective cohort trials are also needed.

Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws

Introduction: Pediatric spinal deformity involves a complex 3-dimensional (3D) deformity that increases the risk of pedicle screw placement due to the close proximity of neurovascular structures. To increase screw accuracy, improve patient safety, and minimize surgical complications, the placement of pedicle screws is evolving from freehand techniques to computer-assisted navigation and to the introduction of robotic-assisted placement. Purpose: The aim of this review was to review the current literature on the use of robotic navigation in pediatric spinal deformity surgery to provide both an error analysis of these techniques and to provide recommendations to ensure its safe application. Methods: A narrative review was conducted in April 2021 using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed retrospective or prospective studies, included pediatric patients, included a primary diagnosis of pediatric spine deformity, utilized robotic-assisted spinal surgery techniques, and reported thoracic or lumbar pedicle screw breach rates or pedicle screw malpositioning. Results: In the few studies published on the use of robotic techniques in pediatric spinal deformity surgery, several found associations between the technology and increased rates of screw placement accuracy, reduced rates of breach, and minimal complications. All were retrospective studies. Conclusions: Current literature is of a low level of evidence; nonetheless, the findings suggest the accuracy and safety of robotic-assisted spinal surgery in pediatric pedicle screw placement. The introduction of robotics may drive further advances in less invasive pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Further study is warranted.

Roadmap for Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Monitoring for Patients Undergoing Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Procedures

MEPs are recommended for patients undergoing lumbar and lumbosacral procedures in which intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is being utilized. While electromyography (EMG) provides critical nerve root proximity information, spontaneous EMG discharges are relatively poor at reliably diagnosing spinal nerve root dysfunction. In contrast, research indicates that MEPs are both sensitive and specific in diagnosing evolving spinal nerve root dysfunction. There is conflicting evidence, however, and it must be emphasized that the value of adding MEPs is only realized when practices and techniques are optimized. The ideal anesthetic plan is an optimized total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) regimen. Selection of appropriate anesthetics and dosing is important for optimizing baseline response amplitudes and promoting diagnostic confidence in analyzing signal changes. An adaptive set of alert criteria that account for baseline amplitude and morphology fluctuations should guide the determination of significant signal change. The therapeutic impact of accurate diagnostic information depends on the timeliness of diagnosis and intervention. Prior to the start of surgery, a plan to obtain MEPs at least once every 10 minutes during the active part of the procedure and after every significant surgical maneuver should be agreed upon, and the intervention plan should include but not be limited to possible removal of hardware and release of retraction or distractive forces. In summary, MEPs can improve monitoring of at-risk nerve root function, but the accuracy and therapeutic impact of such monitoring depend on perioperative planning and communication that optimize use of this modality.

The Use of the Raabe Aspirator in Intraoperative neurophysiological Monitoring during Decompression and Stabilization Interventions for Degenerative Diseases and Injuries of the Lumbar Spine

Background. Raabe probe is a suction device with monopolar motor fibers mapping capabilities. A number of technical characteristics make it possible to use it for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

The aim of this study was to analyze our experience of Raabe probe using for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

Methods. Ninety-eight patients (55 women and 43 men) with degenerative changes and injuries of the lumbar spine were included into the study, mean age – 56.3 ± 12.8 years. Patients underwent the following operations: 85 cases (86.7 %) – spinal roots decompression with fusion by dorsal and ventral implants, 12 cases (12.2 %) – decompression with only dorsal fusion, 1 case (1.0 %) – dorsal fusion without decompression. In all cases intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring control by B. Calancie method with Raabe probe using was performed.

Results. With a critical current threshold of 12 mA, the sensitivity of the method is 94 %, the specificity is 97 %. Comparing the thresholds of the M-response at the stage of screw stimulation, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups of true-positive and false-positive results, both for interested (p = 0.09) and intact (p = 0,

16) screws. At the stage of the impactor stimulation, the threshold of the M-response in the true-positive group made

11.39 ± 7.97 mA, and in the false-positive group – 24.16 ± 8.85 mA (p < 0.05).

Conclusion. Raabe probe application for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbar fusion surgery show the high sensitivity and specificity. The most reliable sign of pedicle wall breach is a threshold below than 12 mA at the stage of the impactor stimulation.

Utility of intraoperative electromyography in placing C7 pedicle screws

OBJECTIVE

The C7 vertebral body is morphometrically unique; it represents the transition from the subaxial cervical spine to the upper thoracic spine. It has larger pedicles but relatively small lateral masses compared to other levels of the subaxial cervical spine. Although the biomechanical properties of C7 pedicle screws are superior to those of lateral mass screws, they are rarely placed due to increased risk of neurological injury. Although pedicle screw stimulation has been shown to be safe and effective in determining satisfactory screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine, there are few studies determining its utility in the cervical spine. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, clinical reliability, and threshold characteristics of intraoperative evoked electromyographic (EMG) stimulation in determining satisfactory pedicle screw placement at C7.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected data set. All adult patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion with placement of C7 pedicle screws at the authors' institution between January 2015 and March 2019 were identified. Demographic, clinical, neurophysiological, operative, and radiographic data were gathered. All patients underwent postoperative CT scanning, and the position of C7 pedicle screws was compared to intraoperative neurophysiological data.

RESULTS

Fifty-one consecutive C7 pedicle screws were stimulated and recorded intraoperatively in 25 consecutive patients. Based on EMG findings, 1 patient underwent intraoperative repositioning of a C7 pedicle screw, and 1 underwent removal of a C7 pedicle screw. CT scans demonstrated ideal placement of the C7 pedicle screw in 40 of 43 instances in which EMG stimulation thresholds were > 15 mA. In the remaining 3 cases the trajectories were suboptimal but safe. When the screw stimulation thresholds were between 11 and 15 mA, 5 of 6 screws were suboptimal but safe, and in 1 instance was potentially dangerous. In instances in which the screw stimulated at thresholds ≤ 10 mA, all trajectories were potentially dangerous with neural compression.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideal C7 pedicle screw position strongly correlated with EMG stimulation thresholds > 15 mA. In instances, in which the screw stimulates at values between 11 and 15 mA, screw trajectory exploration is recommended. Screws with thresholds ≤ 10 mA should always be explored, and possibly repositioned or removed. In conjunction with other techniques, EMG threshold testing is a useful and safe modality in determining appropriate C7 pedicle screw placement.

Accuracy of t-EMG stimulation of the middle pedicle track to prevent radiculopathies as a result of misplaced lumbar screws

OBJECTIVE

To describe the accuracy of middle pedicle track stimulation for the detection of pedicle breaches causing misplaced lumbar screws and subsequent neurological symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a comparative observational study with two cohorts, 1440 lumbar pedicle screws were implanted using the freehand technique in 242 patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformities. In the first two-year period (2011-2012), the accuracy of screw placement (802 screws) was assessed by conventional intraoperative palpation of the pedicle track, t-EMG screw stimulation, and fluoroscopic monitoring. In the second period (2012-2013), the middle aspect of the lumbar pedicle tracks was systematically stimulated with a probe (638 screws). When thresholds in the middle track showed <9 mA, potential neurological risk was considered, and therefore, new pedicle tracks were performed.

RESULTS

Six patients (4.4 %) in the first period presented postoperative radicular pain and a normal intraoperative screw t-EMG threshold. CT scans showed seven screws (0.9 %) with >2-mm medial-caudal invasion of the foramen. Before screw removal, t-EMG thresholds of these screws were again normal (≥10 mA). After removal of the screws. t-EMG of the middle part of the pedicle track showed thresholds below 9 mA (mean 5.2 mA). In the second period, the pedicle tracks were systematically stimulated. Low t-EMG thresholds (<9 mA) were found in 11 tracks (1.7 %) and were therefore reworked before screw placement. CT scans in these 10 patients showed that all of the 11 screws were correctly repositioned.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that caudal or medial pedicle cortical breaches can be detected effectively by stimulating the middle part of the pedicle track. This technique is strongly recommended to prevent postoperative lumbar radiculopathies due to screw malposition.

Application of different thresholds for instrumentation device testing in minimally invasive lumbosacral spine fixation

The main aim of this study was evaluating the reliability of stimulus-evoked electromyography (using different thresholds for stimulation of the instrumentation devices) for minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine. A threshold of 5 mA was applied for the pedicle access needle. 7 mA was applied for the tapscrew and pedicle screw stimulation. The existence of threshold differences between vertebral levels was also assessed. All patients underwent postoperative computed tomography (CT) to determine the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A total of 172 percutaneous pedicle screws were placed in 52 patients. 94.1% of screws were placed at L4, L5 and S1 vertebral levels. No statistically significant differences existed in thresholds of the pedicle access needles, tapscrews and pedicle screws between vertebral levels. In four instances, the pedicle access needle stimulation had a threshold of 5 mA (no breaches were associated). In the rest of occasions, the pedicle access needles had stimulation thresholds above 5 mA. In all instances, tapscrew and pedicle screw thresholds were above 7 mA; the tapscrews and pedicle screws had significantly greater thresholds than the pedicle access needles. No statistically significant differences existed in thresholds between tapscrews and pedicle screws. Postoperative CT imaging revealed one lateral pedicle violation. Both breach rate and false negative rate were 0.5%. No false positive cases were observed. No patients experienced postoperative pedicle screw-related neurologic deficits. A threshold of 5 mA for the pedicle access needle stimulation seems to be safe. Greater than 7 mA should be used for the tapscrew and pedicle screw stimulation.

Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is widely used in spine surgery (sIONM). But guidelines are lacking and its use is mainly driven by individual surgeons' preferences and medicolegal advisements. To gain an overview over the current status of sIONM implementation, we conducted a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

METHODS

We developed a Web interface-based survey assessing prevalence, indication, technical implementation, and general satisfaction regarding sIONM in German, Austrian, and Swiss spine centers. The electronic survey was performed between November 2017 and April 2018, including both neurosurgical and orthopedic spine centers.

RESULTS

A total of 463 German, 60 Austrian, and 52 Swiss spine centers were contacted with participation rates of 64.1% (Germany), 68.3% (Austria), and 55.8% (Switzerland). Some 75.9% participating neurosurgical spine centers and only 14.7% of the orthopedic spine centers applied sIONM. Motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials (93.7% and 94.3%, respectively) were the most widely available modalities, followed by direct wave (D wave; 66.5%). Whereas sIONM utilization was low in spine surgeries for degenerative, traumatic, and extradural tumor diseases, it was high for scoliosis and intradural tumor surgeries. Overall, the general satisfaction within the institutional setting regarding technical skills, staff, performance, and reliability of sIONM was rated as "high" by more than three-quarters of the centers. However, shortage of skilled staff was claimed to be a negative factor by 41.1% of the centers and reimbursement was considered to be insufficient by 83.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

sIONM availability was high in neurosurgical but low in orthopedic spine centers. Main modalities were motor/somatosensory-evoked potentials and main indications were scoliosis and intradural spinal tumor surgeries. A more frequent sIONM use, however, was mainly limited by the shortage of skilled staff and restricted reimbursement.

Triggered EMG (T-EMG) Values of Pedicle Screws with a Powered Screwdriver vs A Standard Probe in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Do Not Agree: A Prospective Validation Study

Triggered electromyography (t-EMG) is a common technique used during spinal instrumentation in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This study tests the validity of t-EMG values obtained with a standard ball-tipped probe after completion of screw placement versus t-EMG values obtained during screw insertion with a powered screwdriver. t-EMG values were collected for screws spanning T7-L5 using both a standard probe and a powered screwdriver. A power analysis determined that a sample size of 300 screws would provide enough precision to estimate limits of agreement within ±2 mA. A monopolar constant current stimulation technique (0.2 ms duration and 3.11 Hz stimulation rate) was used at each level. EMG was acquired with placement of bipolar pairs of subdermal needle electrodes. A Bland-Altman plot was used to assess agreement between threshold readings from the two techniques. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study with 305 screws. t-EMG values measured using a powered screwdriver were on average 1 mA lower than values from a standard probe. When readings less than or equal to 20 mA were considered, the limits of agreement were approximately 4 and 7 mA overall. In total, 28/305 (9%) screws were removed and reinserted, 9/305 (3%) screws were redirected, and 3/305 (1%) screws were aborted based on t-EMG readings. Despite a small overall difference in t-EMG value between the standard probe and screwdriver, there was still large variability in agreement between the two techniques. t-EMG values obtained with a powered screwdriver during screw insertion are not interchangeable with values measured by a probe.

Alert Timing and Corresponding Intervention With Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring for High-Risk Spinal Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the incidence of intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts and neurological complications, as well as to determine which interventions are most effective at preventing postoperative neurological complications following IONM alerts in high risk spinal surgeries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

IONM may play a role in identifying and preventing neural damage; however, few studies have clarified the outcomes of intervention after IONM alerts.

METHODS

We analyzed 2867 patients who underwent surgery for high risk spinal pathology using transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials from 2010 to 2016. The high-risk spinal surgery cases consisted of 1009 spinal deformity cases, 622 cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) cases, 249 thoracic-OPLL cases, 771 extramedullary spinal cord tumor cases, and 216 intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) cases. We set a 70% amplitude reduction as the alarm threshold for transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials and analyzed the outcomes of the interventions following monitoring alerts and postoperative neurological deficits.

RESULTS

The true positive, false positive, true negative, false negative, and rescue cases of IONM comprised 126, 234, 2362, 9, and 136 cases, respectively. Most alerts and interventions occurred during correction and release in deformity cases, posterior decompression and dekyphosis in OPLL cases, and tumor resection and surgery suspension with steroid injection in spinal cord tumor cases; however, individual interventions varied. The rescue rates (number of patients rescued with intervention after IONM alert/number of true positive cases plus rescue cases) for deformity, cervical-OPLL, thoracic--OPLL, extramedullary spinal cord tumor, and IMSCT cases were 61.4% (35/57), 82.1% (32/39), 40% (20/50), 52.5% (31/59), and 31.6% (18/57), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective multicenter study identified potential neural damage in 9.5% of cases and 52% rescue cases using IONM. Although the rescue ratios for t-OPLL and IMSCT were relatively low, appropriate intervention immediately after an IONM alert may prevent neural damage even in high-risk spinal surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Practice guidelines for the supervising professional: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1989 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, Technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically-based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during procedures monitoring the nervous system. This goal is accomplished primarily through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines, among other endeavors. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for the performance of intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were initially published January 24th, 2013, and subsequently that document has undergone review and revision to accommodate broad inter- and intra-societal feedback. This current version of the ASNM Professional Practice Guideline was fully approved for publication according to ASNM bylaws on February 22nd, 2018, and thus overwrites and supersedes the initial guideline.

Electromyography stimulation compared with intraoperative O-arm imaging for evaluating pedicle screw breaches in lumbar spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1006 screws in 164 patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar pedicle screw placement can be technically challenging. Malpositioned screws occur in up to 15% of patients and could result in radiculopathy or instrumentation failure.

PURPOSE

To compare intraoperative electromyography (EMG) and image guidance using an O-arm for identifying pedicle breach during elective lumbar fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion operations for degenerative spine disorders (including adjacent segment degeneration, degenerative scoliosis, and symptomatic spondylosis and spondylolisthesis) at a single institution from July 1, 2014, to December 1, 2015, were prospectively tracked.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pedicle breach.

METHODS

Pedicle screws from L2-S1 were placed using C-arm assisted freehand technique. All screws were stimulated with EMG and evaluated using the O-arm intraoperative imaging system. Electromyography data were compared with intraoperative images to assess the accuracy of identifying pedicle breaches. No funding was received for this work.

RESULTS

One thousand six lumbar pedicles screws were placed from L2 to S1 in 164 consecutive cases. The mean patient age was 59.2 years. Thirty-five breaches (15 lateral and 20 medial) were visualized with O-arm imaging and confirmed by palpation (3.5% of screws placed). Of the breaches, 14 screws stimulated below the 12-mA threshold, nine screws stimulated between 12 and 20 mA, and 12 screws did not generate an EMG response. Forty screws stimulated below a 12-mA threshold but showed no breach on imaging. Using the 12-mA threshold, the sensitivity of EMG was 40%, specificity was 96%, positive predictive value was 26%, and negative predictive value was 98%. All 35 breached screws were corrected during surgery. There were no postoperative symptoms caused by breached screws and no patients required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that EMG may not be a highly reliable tool in determining an anatomical breach during placement of lumbar pedicle screws. O-arm may be better for detecting either medial or lateral breaches than EMG stimulation if there are concerns about screw placement or for confirmation of placement before leaving the operating room.

Focal hole versus screw stimulation to prevent false negative results in detecting pedicle breaches during spinal instrumentation

OBJECTIVE

We describe a stimulus-evoked EMG approach to minimize false negative results in detecting pedicle breaches during lumbosacral spinal instrumentation.

METHODS

In 36 patients receiving 176 lumbosacral pedicle screws, EMG threshold to nerve root activation was determined using a focal probe inserted into the pilot hole at a depth, customized to the individual patients, suitable to position the stimulating tip at the point closest to the tested nerve root. Threshold to screw stimulation was also determined.

RESULTS

Mean EMG thresholds in 161 correctly fashioned pedicle instrumentations were 7.5 mA ± 2.46 after focal hole stimulation and 21.8 mA ± 6.8 after screw stimulation. Direct comparison between both thresholds in individual pedicles showed that screw stimulation was always biased by an unpredictable leakage of the stimulating current ranging from 10 to 90%. False negative results were never observed with hole stimulation but this was not true with screw stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal hole stimulation, unlike screw stimulation, approaches absolute EMG threshold as shown by the lower normal limit (2.6 mA; p < 0.05) that borders the upper limit of threshold to direct activation of the exposed root.

SIGNIFICANCE

The technique provides an early warning of a possible pedicle breakthrough before insertion of the more harmful, larger and threaded screw.

A new criterion for the alarm point using a combination of waveform amplitude and onset latency in Br(E)-MsEP monitoring in spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

Monitoring of brain evoked muscle-action potentials (Br[E]-MsEPs) is a sensitive method that provides accurate periodic assessment of neurological status. However, occasionally this method gives a relatively high rate of false-positives, and thus hinders surgery. The alarm point is often defined based on a particular decrease in amplitude of a Br(E)-MsEP waveform, but waveform latency has not been widely examined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate onset latency in Br(E)-MsEP monitoring in spinal surgery and to examine the efficacy of an alarm point using a combination of amplitude and latency.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was performed in 83 patients who underwent spine surgery using intraoperative Br(E)-MsEP monitoring. A total of 1726 muscles in extremities were chosen for monitoring, and acceptable baseline Br(E)-MsEP responses were obtained from 1640 (95%). Onset latency was defined as the period from stimulation until the waveform was detected. Relationships of postoperative motor deficit with onset latency alone and in combination with a decrease in amplitude of ≥ 70% from baseline were examined.

RESULTS

Nine of the 83 patients had postoperative motor deficits. The delay of onset latency compared to the control waveform differed significantly between patients with and without these deficits (1.09% ± 0.06% vs 1.31% ± 0.14%, p < 0.01). In ROC analysis, an intraoperative 15% delay in latency from baseline had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 96% for prediction of postoperative motor deficit. In further ROC analysis, a combination of a decrease in amplitude of ≥ 70% and delay of onset latency of ≥ 10% from baseline had sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, a false positive rate of 7%, a false negative rate of 0%, a positive predictive value of 64%, and a negative predictive value of 100% for this prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

In spinal cord monitoring with intraoperative Br(E)-MsEP, an alarm point using a decrease in amplitude of ≥ 70% and delay in onset latency of ≥ 10% from baseline has high specificity that reduces false positive results.

Retrospective Analysis of EMG-evoked Potentials in Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of electromyographic (EMG) stimulation thresholds of 64 cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws.

OBJECTIVE

The authors seek to determine whether recordings below stimulation threshold correlate with CBT screw pedicle breach on computed tomographic imaging, and to explore which specific nerve roots are most at risk with this new trajectory.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative EMG monitoring has been utilized to verify accurate placement of pedicle screws. Although CBT screws are becoming increasingly popular, to the authors' knowledge there are no existing evaluations of the accuracy of intraoperative triggered EMG (tEMG) monitoring in this trajectory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of EMG stimulation thresholds of 64 CBT screws placed in patients at NYU Langone Medical Center from 2015-2017. EMG results including threshold values and muscle group stimulated were correlated with screw positioning determined on postoperative or intraoperative computed tomographic imaging.

RESULTS

In total, 4.7% of EMG threshold values indicated true breach, 1.6% were falsely positive for breach, 76.5% showed true absence of breach, 17.1% failed to reveal a present breach though 0% of medial breaches were undetected. L4 screws showed tEMG responses from adductor longus in 22%, L5 screws, from rectus femoris in 16.7%, and S1 screws from tibialis anterior in 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

tEMG testing is effective for medial breaches in CBT screws. In addition, there is evidence that bicortical placement of these screws causes lower stimulation values due to distal breach. Importantly, it seems that this is due in part to stimulation of the exiting nerve root at the level above.

Mechanomyography for Intraoperative Assessment of Cortical Breach During Instrumented Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the utility of mechanomyography (MMG) in detecting and preventing pedicle breach in instrumented lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

In a prospective nonrandomized trial without controls, we selected consecutive patients to undergo intraoperative MMG during instrumented lumbar spine surgery. MMG testing was performed at the original pilot hole, after tapping, and after screw placement, with the minimum current to elicit a recorded MMG response. All patients underwent a postoperative computed tomography scan, and a single radiologist interpreted each pedicle to identify breach. Chi-square test was used to compare patients with and without breaches. Two sample Student's t-tests were used to compare changes in functional outcomes. Sensitivity and specificity of MMG were computed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

There were 122 consecutive instrumented lumbar surgery patients enrolled, with a total of 890 lumbar pedicle screws tested with MMG. The medial or inferior breach rate was 2.25%, with no statistically significant difference in Oswestry Disability Index or visual analog scale between patients who breached and who did not. For the MMG measurement from the original pilot hole, the area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.835; the maximum combination of sensitivity (80.42%) and specificity (80.6%) was found using MMG current ≤12 mA. We found that an MMG cutoff of >12 mA resulted in a 99.5% likelihood of no medial or inferior breach.

CONCLUSIONS

MMG can be safely used during instrumented lumbar spine surgery. A cutoff value of >12 mA for MMG can accurately predict and prevent medial and inferior pedicle screw breach.

Accuracy and Safety of Percutaneous Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement Using Dual-Planar Intraoperative Fluoroscopy

Study Design

Retrospective case series with prospective arm.

Purpose

To assess the safety and accuracy of percutaneous lumbosacral pedicle screw placement (PLPSP) in the lumbosacral spine using intraoperative dual-planar fluoroscopy (DPF).

Overview of Literature

There are several techniques available for achieving consistent, safe, and accurate results with PLPSP. There is a paucity of literature describing the beneficial operative, economic, and clinical outcomes of DPF, the most readily accessible image guidance system.

Methods

From 2004 to 2014, 451 consecutive patients underwent PLPSP using DPF, for a total of 2,345 screw placement. The results of prospectively obtained postoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations of an additional 41 consecutive patients were compared with the results of 104 CT examinations obtained postoperatively due to clinical symptomatology; these results were interpreted by three reviewers. The rates of revision indicated by misplaced screws with consistent clinical symptomatology were compared between groups. Pedicle screw placement was graded according to 2-mm increments in medial pedicle wall breach and measurement of screw axis placement.

Results

Seven of the 2,345 pedicle screws placed percutaneously with the use of the dual-planar fluoroscopic technique required revision because of a symptomatic misplaced screw, for a screw revision rate of 0.3%. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between patients who had screws revised and those who did not. All screws registered greater than 10 mA on electromyographic stimulation. In the 41 prospectively obtained CT examinations, one out of 141 screws (0.7%) was revised due to pedicle wall breach; whereas among the 104 patients with 352 screws, three screws were revised (0.9%).

Conclusions

DPF is an extremely accurate, safe, and reproducible technique for placement of percutaneous pedicle screws and is a readily available and cost-effective alternative to CT-guided pedicle screw placement techniques. Postoperative CT evaluation is not necessary with PLPSP unless the patient is symptomatic. Acceptable electromyographic thresholds may need to be reevaluated.

Perils of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: analysis of "false-negative" results in spine surgeries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although some authors have published case reports describing false negatives in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), a systematic review of causes of false-negative IONM results is lacking.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze false-negative IONM findings in spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A cohort of 109 patients with new postoperative neurologic deficits was analyzed for possible false-negative IONM reporting.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The causes of false-negative IONM reporting were determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a cohort of 62,038 monitored spine surgeries, 109 consecutive patients with new postoperative neurologic deficits were reviewed for IONM alarms.

RESULTS

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alarms occurred in 87 of 109 surgeries. Nineteen patients with new postoperative neurologic deficits did not have an IONM alarm and surgeons were not warned. In addition, three patients had no interpretable IONM baseline data and no alarms were possible for the duration of the surgery. Therefore, 22 patients were included in the study. The absence of IONM alarms during these 22 surgeries had different origins: "true" false negatives where no waveform changes meeting the alarm criteria occurred despite the appropriate IONM (7); a postoperative development of a deficit (6); failure to monitor the pathway, which became injured (5); the absence of interpretable IONM baseline data which precluded any alarm (3); and technical IONM application issues (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the rate of IONM method failing to predict the patient's outcome was very low (0.04%, 22/62,038). Minimizing false negatives requires the application of a proper IONM technique with the limitations of each modality considered in their selection and interpretation. Multimodality IONM provides the most inclusive information, and although it might be impractical to monitor every neural structure that can be at risk, a thorough preoperative consideration of available IONM modalities is important. Delayed development of postoperative deficits cannot be predicted by IONM. Absent baseline IONM data should be treated as an alarm when inconsistent with the patient's preoperative neurologic status. Alarm criteria for IONM may need to be refined for specific procedures and deserves continued study.

Neuromonitoring in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multimodality Approach

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the available intraoperative monitoring techniques and the evidence around their efficacy in vertebral column resection.

METHODS

The history of neuromonitoring and evolution of the modalities are reviewed and discussed. The authors' specific surgical techniques and preferred methods are outlined in detail. In addition, the authors' experience and the literature regarding vertebral column resection and surgical mitigation of neurologic alarms are discussed at length.

RESULTS

Risk factors for signal changes have been identified, including preoperative neurologic deficit, severe kyphosis, increased curve magnitude, and significant cord shortening. Even though no evidence-based treatment algorithm exist for signal changes, strategies are discussed that can help prevent alarms and address them appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Through implementation of multimodal intraoperative monitoring techniques, potential neurologic injuries are localized and managed in real time. Intraoperative monitoring is a valuable tool for improving the safety and outcome of spinal deformity surgery.

Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring to optimize safe lumbar pedicle screw placement - a retrospective analysis

Background

The foremost concern of a surgeon during pedicle screw fixation is safety. Assistive modalities, especially intraoperative electromyographic monitoring (EMG) can function as an essential tool to recognize screw malposition that compromise neural integrity, so that the screws can be repositioned immediately rather than later. We intend to study the efficacy of intraoperative EMG monitoring to detect potential pedicle breach and evaluate whether reoperation rates were significantly reduced.

Methods

Retrospectively, patients who underwent posterior stabilization with pedicle screws for various pathologies were analysed and those with screws among L1-S1 levels were shortlisted. They were divided into two groups. Group 1 included patients in whom trigger EMG (t-EMG) was used to confirm appropriate screw placement and Group 2 included those in whom it was not used. Responses to t-EMG and corresponding stimulation thresholds were recorded for Group 1 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the test was calculated. Reoperation rates due to postoperative neurologic compromise caused by malpositioned screws were compared between both the groups.

Results

A total of 518 patients had 3112 pedicle screws between L1-S1 levels. Among Group 1 [n = 296; Screws = 1856], 145 screws (7.8%) showed a positive response for t-EMG at stimulation thresholds ranging between 2.6 to 19.8 mA. The sensitivity and specificity of t-EMG to diagnose potential pedicle breach was found to be 93.33% and 92.88% respectively. Only one patient among Group 1 required reoperation. However, among Group 2 [n = 222; screws = 1256], six patients required reoperation. This indicated a significant decrease in the number of malpositioned screws that caused neurological compromise [p = 0.02], leading to subsequent decrease in reoperation rates [p = 0.04] among Group 1 patients.

Conclusions

Trigger EMG is well efficient in detecting potential pedicle screw breaches that might endanger neural integrity. In combination with palpatory and radiographic assessment, it will certainly aid safe and secure pedicle screw placement. It can also efficiently reduce reoperation rates due to neurologic compromise provoked by a malpositioned screw.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Alarms: Relationship of the Surgeon's Decision to Intervene (or Not) and Clinical Outcomes in a Subset of Spinal Surgical Patients with a New Postoperative Neurological Deficit

BACKGROUND

The goal of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is to minimize neurologic injury during surgery, yet patients still emerge with postoperative deficits. Few studies focus on outcomes relative to IONM alarms and interventions in this population. The authors sought to analyze the influence of IONM alarms with and without surgical intervention on patient outcome in spinal surgical patients who suffered immediate postoperative neurologic deficits.

METHODS

Of 62,038 spinal surgeries with multimodality IONM, 90 patients with new or worsened postoperative neurologic deficits and whose outcomes were reported immediate to the surgery and at discharge were analyzed. Outcomes at discharge were compared for surgeries in which an IONM alarm versus no alarm occurred. Outcomes where surgical intervention was performed versus not performed were also compared.

RESULTS

By discharge, 48 (53.3%) of 90 patients had complete or partial recovery of their postoperative deficit. Patients with IONM alarms and surgical interventions had an 80% (39/49) recovery rate overall versus only 26% (7/27) recovery rate of patients with IONM alarms but no interventions, and only 14% (2/14) of patients without IONM alarms and without interventions (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data showed significantly more patients recovered by the time of discharge when a surgical intervention was precipitated by an IONM alarm versus when it was not. The authors conclude that surgical interventions based on IONM alarms do improve patient outcomes despite immediate postoperative deficit.

Lateral mass screw stimulation thresholds in posterior cervical instrumentation surgery: a predictor of medial deviation

OBJECTIVE Normative data exists for stimulus-evoked pedicle screw electromyography (EMG) current thresholds in the lumbar spine, and is routinely referenced during spine surgeries to detect a screw breach, prevent injury of neural elements, and ensure the most biomechanically sound instrumentation construct. To date, similar normative data for cervical lateral mass screws is limited, thus the utility of lateral mass screw testing remains unclear. To address this disparity, in this study the authors describe cumulative lateral mass screw stimulation threshold data in patients undergoing posterior cervical instrumentation with lateral mass screws. These data are correlated with screw placement on postoperative imaging, and a novel correlation is discovered with direct clinical implications. METHODS Using a ball-tip probe, 154 lateral mass screws in 21 patients were electrically tested intraoperatively. In each case, for each screw, the lowest (or threshold) current at which the first polyphasic stimulus-evoked EMG response was reproducibly observed by a neurophysiologist was recorded. All patients underwent postoperative CT. Screw position within the lateral mass was first measured in the axial and sagittal planes for each lateral mass screw using the CT images. Screw placement was also evaluated by 2 independent physicians, blinded to current threshold data, on a binary scale of acceptability. The predictive capacity of screw EMG threshold data was evaluated via multivariable regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Predictive capacity was examined with respect to screw position within the lateral mass, as well as screw acceptability. RESULTS Lateral mass screw EMG thresholds did not appear to differ significantly for screws considered "acceptable" versus "unacceptable" according to the radiographic criteria. Accordingly, ROC analysis confirmed that EMG current threshold data were of minimal utility in predicting screw radiographic acceptability. However, EMG threshold was significantly predictive of screw medial distance from the spinal canal. A screw stimulating below 7.5 mA correctly identified a screw as being within 2 mm of the spinal canal with 75% sensitivity and 92% specificity (positive predictive value 20%, negative predictive value 99.3%), independent of its distance relative to other lateral mass landmarks. EMG current threshold was not significantly predictive of screw deviation in the superior or inferior directions, and was inversely predictive of screw deviations in the lateral direction. CONCLUSIONS In the context of uncertainty regarding the utility of cervical lateral mass EMG current threshold data, this study found that EMG current thresholds correspond significantly, and exclusively, with screw distance from the spinal canal. This association appears independent of other criteria for screw misplacement. As such, the authors recommend that EMG current thresholds be referenced in the case of a suspected medial breach as an effective means to rule out screw placement too medial to the spinal canal.

CORRELATION: IMPEDANCE AND TOMOGRAPHY IN IMPLANTS INSERTION IN LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS

ABSTRACT Objective: To define whether the electroneurophysiological stimulation would be a safe method for reducing injuries in nerve roots during surgery of lumbar spine arthrodesis, as well as verify whether there is a direct correlation between the intraoperative impedance values and the distance from the medial cortical pedicle screw. Methods: Randomized retrospective multicenter study of 10 patients who underwent arthrodesis of lumbar spine after conservative treatment failure, with a total of 50 pedicle screws instrumented. Reliable and safe impedance values were measured in order to reduce the risk of injury to nerve roots in the perioperative period, and these values were compared with the distance between the screw and the medial cortical of the pedicle by CT scan, measured in the immediate post-operative period. Results: There is no direct correlation between the intraoperative impedance values and the distance from the screw to the medial cortical of the pedicle. Conclusion: The electroneurostimulation proved to be a reliable quantitative method to reduce the risk of injury to nerve roots during surgery of lumbar spine arthrodesis when the measured values are greater than 10mA.

Neurophysiological monitoring of lumbar spinal nerve roots: A case report of postoperative deficit and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has proven to help reduce the probability of postoperative neurological deficit for spinal deformity correctional surgeries. However, in rare cases new deficits may still happen. We report a surgical case in which the patient had postoperative paralysis. We would like to call for more case reports with postoperative neurological deficits as they present difficult clinical cases.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 61-year-old male patient with severe thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis underwent posterior spinal correction and fusion with segmental T10-L5 pedicle screws and rods instrumentation with IONM. The only intraoperative event was a pedicle breach at left L3 which was detected by triggered electromyography (EMG) testing, and the pedicle screw was repositioned. Left lower extremity paralysis was observed upon patient awakening. He received rehabilitation treatment and had limited recovery of muscle strength. Partial lumbar nerve root injury was likely the cause of the paralysis.

DISCUSSION

This is a case with new lumbar nerve root deficit, with positive EMG signal change, but negative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) findings. We discuss the different neurophysiological modalities for monitoring lumbar spinal nerve root function. We review journal articles from the past two decades which reported lumbar root deficits, and list neuromonitoring events during the surgeries.

CONCLUSION

Multimodality monitoring with spontaneous and electrically triggered EMG combined with SSEP and MEP may provide the best chance to detect lumbar nerve root injuries.

Stimulus-Evoked Electromyographic Monitoring During Minimally Invasive Transpedicular Implantation of Screws in Lumbosacral Spine: Threshold Value, Methodology and Clinical Effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Stimulus-evoked electromyography (EMG) has been developed to increase the safety of transpedicular placement of screws. There is more consensus about this monitoring method in open surgery. Alarm thresholds for minimally invasive surgery are based on referential value for open surgery. Nevertheless, there are no uniform alarm criteria on this modality for minimally invasive surgery. Using an analysis of alarm threshold, methodology and clinical effectiveness on stimulus-evoked EMG monitoring for minimally invasive transpedicular implantation of screws in the lumbosacral spine, this study aims to reflect and recommend for optimizing accuracy.

METHODS

Using a selection of studies, an analysis of the pedicle breach rates and breach-related clinical complication rates was made between studies on minimally invasive surgery by applying different thresholds. A second analysis of the pedicle breach rates and breach-related clinical complication rates was made between studies on open and minimally invasive surgery by applying the same threshold.

RESULTS

In minimally invasive surgery, stimulus-evoked EMG has an acceptable accuracy in the detection of clinical relevant pedicle breaches. Suction limitation may alter the stimulation threshold. No significant differences in clinical effectiveness were observed between studies by applying thresholds of 5 mA, 7 mA, and 12 mA. However, a low threshold of 5 mA seems inappropriate for the tap stimulation.

CONCLUSION

In minimally invasive surgery, continuous stimulation of instrumentation devices is recommended. A minimum 5-mA threshold should be used for stimulation of the pedicle access needle. Use of higher-stimulation thresholds during tapping and incorporation of an adapted continuous suction system may optimize the accuracy of stimulus-evoked EMG.

The use of intraoperative triggered electromyography to detect misplaced pedicle screws: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECT

Insertion of instruments or implants into the spine carries a risk for injury to neural tissue. Triggered electromyography (tEMG) is an intraoperative neuromonitoring technique that involves electrical stimulation of a tool or screw and subsequent measurement of muscle action potentials from myotomes innervated by nerve roots near the stimulated instrument. The authors of this study sought to determine the ability of tEMG to detect misplaced pedicle screws (PSs).

METHODS

The authors searched the US National Library of Medicine, the Web of Science Core Collection database, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for PS studies. A meta-analysis of these studies was performed on a per-screw basis to determine the ability of tEMG to detect misplaced PSs. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) were calculated overall and in subgroups.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in the systematic review. The authors analyzed 18 studies in which tEMG was used during PS placement in the meta-analysis, representing data from 2932 patients and 15,065 screws. The overall sensitivity of tEMG for detecting misplaced PSs was 0.78, and the specificity was 0.94. The overall ROC AUC was 0.96. A tEMG current threshold of 10–12 mA (ROC AUC 0.99) and a pulse duration of 300 µsec (ROC AUC 0.97) provided the most accurate testing parameters for detecting misplaced screws. Screws most accurately conducted EMG signals (ROC AUC 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Triggered electromyography has very high specificity but only fair sensitivity for detecting malpositioned PSs.

Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint

Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. To document the clinical utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion for patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction (as a direct result of sacroiliac joint disruptions or degenerative sacroiliitis) and determine stimulated electromyography thresholds reflective of favorable implant position. Summary of Background Data. Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a well-accepted adjunct to minimally invasive pedicle screw placement. The utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion using a series of triangular, titanium porous plasma coated implants has not been evaluated. Methods. A medical chart review of consecutive patients treated with minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion was undertaken at a single center. Baseline patient demographics and medical history, intraoperative electromyography thresholds, and perioperative adverse events were collected after obtaining IRB approval. Results. 111 implants were placed in 37 patients. Sensitivity of EMG was 80% and specificity was 97%. Intraoperative neuromonitoring potentially avoided neurologic sequelae as a result of improper positioning in 7% of implants. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that intraoperative neuromonitoring may be a useful adjunct to minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion in avoiding nerve injury during implant placement.

The surgical learning curve and accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using CT based computer-assisted navigation plus continuous electromyography monitoring - a retrospective review of 627 screws in 150 patients

Objective

This study retrospectively assessed the accuracy of placement of lumbar pedicle screws placed by a single surgeon using a minimally-invasive, intra-operative CT-based computer navigated technique in combination with continuous electromyography (EMG) monitoring. The rates of incorrectly positioned screws were reviewed in the context of the surgeon's experience and learning curve.

Methods

Data was retrospectively reviewed from all consecutive minimally invasive lumbar fusions performed by the primary author over a period of over 4 years from April 2008 until October 2012. All cases that had utilized computer-assisted intra-operative CT-based image guidance and continuous EMG monitoring to guide percutaneous pedicle screw placement were analysed for the rates of malposition of the pedicle screws. Pedicle screw malposition was defined as having occurred if the screw trajectory was adjusted intraoperatively due to positive EMG responses, or due to breach of the pedicle cortex by more than 2mm on intraoperative CT imaging performed at the end of the instrumentation procedure. Further analysis of the data was undertaken to determine if the rates of malposition changed with the surgeon's experience with the technique.

Results

Six hundred and twenty-seven pedicle screws were placed in one hundred and fifty patients. The overall rate of intraoperative malposition and subsequent adjustment of pedicle screw placement was 3.8% (24 of 627 screws). Screw malposition was detected by intraoperative CT imaging. Warning of potential screw misplacement was provided by use of the EMG monitoring. With increased experience with the technique, rates of intraoperative pedicle screw malposition were found to decrease from 5.1% of screws in the first fifty patients, to 2.0% in the last 50 patients. Only one screw was suboptimally placed at the end of surgery, which did not result in a neurological deficit.

Conclusion

The use of CT-based computer-assisted navigation in combination with continuous EMG monitoring during percutaneous transpedicular screw placement results in very low rates of malposition and neural injury that compare favourably with previously reported rates. Pedicle screw placement accuracy continues to improve as the surgeon becomes more experienced with the technique.

Overview of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Spine Surgery

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has had major advances in the past few decades. During spine surgery, the use of multimodality monitoring enables us to assess the integrity of the spinal cord, nerve roots, and peripheral nerves. The authors present a practical approach to the current modalities in use during spine surgery, including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, spinal D-waves, and free-run and triggered electromyography. Understanding the complementary nature of these modalities will help tailor monitoring to a particular procedure to minimize postoperative neurologic deficit during spine surgery.